She was being satirical and ironic. Her statement was not meant to be taken seriously.

@@tuzziosamson3601 trust me, no one is taking her seriously.

There was a roman emperor. He had a brilliant idea of universal clothes for all of the slaves. His advisors told him:" Bad idea. They will understand they are majority".

@@tuzziosamson3601 that's why a lot of people do not take feminism serious. Because it is not serious. You have just proven my point. No chance at argument now.

Feminists claim that the color pink is sexist

true, I got the same feeling from this.

What makes me laugh is feminists claim this is cis behavior to interrupt so much.

Lmao big facts

@@stardewdaisy4577 Well if you want to compare it's like an adult talking to pair of 5-year-olds. Sometimes they need to be taught.

@@stardewdaisy4577 That's just him being himself, you're misunderstanding. Also if you can't decipher what I'm getting at then it's not worth my time to argue.

Thats the definition of an interviewer who had no intention of having an interview but rather trap the other person taking things out of context and framing questions as a gotcha

@@imo098765 It reminds me of a congressional hearing the other day. Some congressman asks an IRS whistle-blower for an explanation of the situation. The whistle-blower eagerly starts to explain what happened and he is immediately cut off. The man that asked the question says they don't have time for this explanation. LOL

she talks down to him. Like she's the mother & he's the out of line teenager. This is the delusion of modern feminism. That women are superior to men. Each gender is good in their own way. But they aren't superior to each other.

​@@imo098765Poor Jordy got destroyed.

love how u out it with emphasis on 'gotcha'@@imo098765

The BeardedFetus 👌👌😂😂😂

perfect analogy

LOL hilarios. Best comment, best name.

Lol....

Smashed it out of the park with that analogy. LOL! You made my day.

I second that. He sat through that ridiculous attempt at intellectualism and it ended up as a hens talk with Peterson just rubbernecking back and forth...

Kyle Mouttet absolutely

He is amazing at allowing people to speak and allowing people to speak over him and try and put words in his mouth....then shuts them down in one sentence! Very smart man.

I love his views.

You are so right. I admire him for many reasons, but I think you nailed the number one. Listening to feminist drivel for over 50 years, I could never sit there and listen to those insufferable idiots pontificate while Peterson sat there. Does anyone actually interview anymore?

And now he is benzo addict ranting and raving on twitter

Your brilliant supposition? Probably by a jealous liberal !

@@michael3885He’s not addicted anymore lol. Anybody can get addicted to something, that doesn’t take away the credibility of their claims.

​@@michael3885so what you're saying is that if someone messes up once, they're not redeemable?

@@HouseOfHockey14 unless it turned their brain to Swiss cheese, and judging from the 50 rambling tweets a day he now posts, he is past his prime

Facts, you can see it in his eyes like "why I'm I talking to these unsmart apes"

Non-academic? Those women went to universities too but they are blinded by their ideologies... that's different

​@@whocares2465no one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.

Now days academics are WORSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I've watched him dismantle many of those as well...

@@AquaStevae No one can find an intellectual idea by JP

Sincerely*

@@x_zerzex7556 I thank you :)

A single name as an exclamation. What unearthly self-confidence is this?

@@GodsMistake Don't try to dim my shine.

And for me too🙂❤

The best part is he has done more to help professional women in the high end workforce than any government. Ask him about it he'll tell you all about it.

The world is much like it always was: people are running away from responsibility and moral behavior. I think we are just much more aware of it because of the internet and social media. Because people can hide behind anonymity, they express what they really believe more frequently and as such we can see how immoral people really are. I really appreciate that there is at least on person out there campaigning for moral responsibility. I like that Jordan Peterson explains very clearly his REASONS why people should seek to be moral and even "noble" as he puts it, because too much of the dialogue I see online revolves around money, sex, and immediate gratification. He doesn't sound like he's sermonizing, but rather he's arguing for good, common sense so people are armed against life's calamities.

MAD IS BEING TOO KIND.

Absolutely.

Yes, finally someone educated enough to represent COMMON SENSE AND SANITY!

Sounds very "naggy" Lol

Trust me we have millions of dumb people over here, these women literally represent the norm

Brilliant.

Lol, this comment made my day :)

sounds like sheeet

That's the biggest problem with most of the people that try to push these agendas. They're incapable of having an actual intelligent debate. Instead, they just memorize phrases that they don't completely understand and try to shoe-horn them into discussions.

Absolutely

@@Jason-po7on Yup. A lot of university-fed androids.

Just ask them to clarify.

Never forget these fools see this as a power struggle, a war on "oppression", and as the saying goes "all is fair in love and war" they seem to live by this with zero sense of honour or integrity. A pretty good way to see how the interviewer/show will be is how they refer to Dr Peterson, if they simply call him an academic or his name they are usually against him, If they refer to him as Doctor or professor they are either relatively neutral or in favour of him.

Ignorance is rampant

She looks like an old geezer in a dress 👗 to me

Dayuum,nice one!!!

That’s shapist!!! I’m offended!!!

Isn't this straw-manning his opposition? The same thing that others wrongly do to him at times? I'm a fan of Peterson (and also a progressive), but it's important to realize when any side of a debate is illogical, not just the side you agree with.

@@NikeMike80 I'm not a shapist! Just a shape realist...

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Timothy Lalthanmawia not wrong

That’s a very good point, but calling it a weapon is far too much of a compliment. The thing is it’s not even a weapon nor a defense tactic. This feminist constantly interrupting him is the equivalent of a child covering their ears and screaming because they didn’t get their way. She just knows her bullshit argument is not valid or feasible, and that’s very applicable to many of these situations.

Oh I bet feminists love being dominated lol

They're using all the female manipulative tactics in the book. Interrupting, potshotting, teaming up, twisting narratives, and repeat over and over, and got the nerve to act like they're educated.

They want dominance, not equality.

i always responded with yes

Try to watch him debating with Sam Harris or Matt Dillahunty

@@averroes238 Pssh those guys are hacks lol

Yea, haha pretty much. Goodness!

When i'm drunk i turn into a feminist, i love women when drunk and agree with everything they say!!

That is the comment that should be on top!

mannix flint I’d take a Rancid Cow to bed compared to...... that ... ‘ thing’ any day.....

-''One of our guest of the day is a man you may recognize or maybe you don't'' Wow, wha a kind human being she is. /s

Yeah us Brits are really good at being passive aggressive. She's actually quite bad at it.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

I've not even watched the debate, and it's already obvious...

💯💯💯💯

That's Mr. Represented to you.

I dont even call it an interviewer.

Jonathan Vachon so true man, that is a title she doesn’t deserve

Proceeds to misrepresent his opinion almost immediately, kinda ironic. Hate this superficial “gotcha” style of questioning that seems to pervade modern interviews.

💯💯💯

Of course that's a problem too. I SAW A video where woman was saying they are changing words Like why HUMAN has man in it. WHY woman has man in it. Female etccc. WAS SO stupid

@@cambelasben Jesus f*cking Christ 🤦‍♀️ They're really going out of their way to find a problem. They always say "making progress" and yet they will NEVER be satisfied, its like they're skating up a hill.

@@ParallelElle Its true. Check * Purdue writing guide say avoid use of word man* she is crazy.

Benie please send a link. I want to cringe me to sleep. Thank you

@@conrie0110 I dont know how to send link here. But just search on KZfaq. Purdue writing guide says valid use of word man. It's on fox news youtube

Its sad when you only focus on what you are saying, and trying to only get your point across. Rather than trying to understand any counter or reasoning in opposition to your own opinion.

Well thats what feminist do they just throw stuff at you and refuse to learn bc their "beliefs" are "solid"

They're feminists...

Jake Avraham exactly my point. These talk shows are one sided. And the heading of this video is meaningless.

Basically a lot of his interviews

Off to a good start, that's certainly one of the traits your man would cherish you for.

@@Xlife018 Thanks. Few men seem to notice those of us who are not like this...or maybe they assume we all are? (the sad mgtow and all....)

​@@LittleMissHoop Most of them do, yes. And no surprise, because the average person just buys whatever is being sold by the mainstream media. High quality individuals, who think for themselves instead are not many.

Do you have an Ig or something? I would love to meet a girl like that. :)

Oh, approach in the comment section. *Grabs popcorn*

Absolutely!! 👍

Fooled me in the first half, I have to say.

Copied this from Bali... unoriginal and you added cringe lol

@@leocarvalho8051 name me one thing that isn't considered sexists for the extremists feminist

@@nekogarou7474 extremist feminists

@@leocarvalho8051 you got me there xD

I LOVE this comment

I would give you 500 likes if I could

Exactly what I thought 😂

here we go again

She says she wears a pink dress because she's a feminist, but isn't feminism about fighting _against_ stereotypes?

They think they're smarter you can tell by how they speak and play off his response! Unfortunately they're idiots 😂

@@sarapatch616 you just gave a very good definition of an Idiot.

Here!!here!!

That presenter is one vile odious creature. Makes my skin crawl !

@@JA-ou7nt Aaah! But by simply criticising her, as an individual, you have shown you are a misogynistic, sexist, bigoted pig. You will be dragged before the Ministry of Truth and re-programmed so you will think exactly as you are told!

F3minist logic

‘That answer doesn’t paint you in the light I want so we’re gonna move on’

She had no response to that 🤣🤣

Because they see only what they want to see. They protest, shout and scream about everything in the west but then turn a blind eye and don't utter a word when it comes to how eastern countries treat women. This woke, left wing, PC culture is killing the west. The people of western countries are increasingly losing the right to see and think as they see fit and it's terrifying that it's happening

@@grandadmiralthrawn9231 Actually, most intersectional feminists will tell you that women being abused in Eastern countries does not in any way negate or "cancel out" women being abused differently in western countries. It's not an either/or. Women are abused quite differently depending on the culture, that should be obvious- but you are all missing it, as usual. Ms. Jordan-a Peterson is saying "since lung cancer is more deadly than breast cancer, breast cancer is not bad at all and people with breast cancer shouldn't whine and bother doctors about it- it's not like they have lung cancer". Anybody with 2 brain cells to rub together can see that this is a strawman's fallacy. Unfortunately very few of Ms. Jordan-a Petersons's followers HAVE 2 brain cells and so they miss that entirely. Just because somebody is abused in a different way elsewhere, does not make abuse here okay. duh.

Louie ikr like wtf.

So true 😂😂

yeah the presenter is so rude and set in her beliefs she wont even let Jordan speak

in a fucking nutshell

This but tomorrow's headline will be "Jordan Peterson doesn't deny he's racist and sexist"

the woman on the left is a supporter of him. She is listening and liking what he says. When it preaches each others arguments they over ride the others statement to make it facts. The woman on the right ended up shutting down the woman on the left and Jordan because she had no control in the debate and the other 2 saw eye to eye on how society sits

Feminists are dumb by default. Think of a man, and take away reason and accountability.

@@jackknopf5974 i can PARTIALLY agree. I believe women deserve freedom of opportunity and speech. So does that woman on the left, so does Jordan. There are intelligent women who deserve a lot, not many unfortunately but when u see them you shouldn't generalize them

@@CRAZYN1NJA the problem with that statement is that if your siding with those women who claim to be feminists, they are far too ignorant to see that what they are trying to get rid of is that they are just passing it onto men hence them constantly ignoring Jordan. They are an example why feminists are treated the way they are nowadays however there are a small collective of feminists who aren't hypocritical of what they try to debate for

They’re afraid

Daniel Roth Potent paradox.

man that was said by Charles Manson lol

It is dunning-kurger effect~

It’s a common affliction.

Dunning Kruger effect ! She thinks her cognitive ability is greater than it is.

Reverse mansplaining??? Nobody thought it was possible until that day

I've always thought that to be the most common feminist attitude... Male or female, shouting and shutting down conversations they don't like is their thing.

Right they also didn’t listen to anything he said!

It's sad that this IS feminism now. These people are ruining what feminism is meant to be. It's all about equality but these morons only want to put men down and make the world soft.

@@kube410 reverse mansplaining is called "bitching".

He’s destroying sjws and feminists

Destruction is usually a good teacher

@@anantaks.s4655 I'd say deconstruction is more on the mark, followed by reconstructing.

Yes, I agree

Well said

I think it was tongue in cheek m8

Well Femenism is like a dress, it's something pink to show, a banner

Exactly I noticed it too and badly wanted Jordan to refute her on that.

@@salaahkhayr2398 why are you pretending she wasn't joking? She blatently was yet you want to act like she wasn't? Pathetic

j ap lol I didn’t know feminists makes jokes against there own agendas now.

That was a rule put in place because men just pushed women out the way. That is not a testament for the good of man, quite the opposite, actually.

Uh oh,thats sexist and morally outrageous of u!im ringing the Equality Police,better lawyer up 👍👍😂

Idiots =/= trolls.

The most interesting thing here, Tyrone McDonald, is the genuine intelligence gap between Jordan and Tyrone McDonald. Labeling anyone who disagrees with dr. Peterson as a troll clearly identifies you as an unthinking individual and therefore you have nothing of value to share.

Indeed

Lorraine Connor that’s so sweet Lorraine I’m Guessing you disagree with Jordan who presents a common logic standpoint and anyone who shares common logic is somehow dumb to you ! Must be why I have over 500 likes on this thread and you are alone.

🤣

Jordan: Im thirsty..i need a glass of water. Interviewer: Hitler drank water...

@@simonlloyd7557 not only that, hitler was 70 percent water!

@@commondirtbagz7130 MEIN GOT!

Hahahahah

Oh shit. Here we go again

Ten years later there Is no water left

@Liberty AboveAllElse was it '#yesidohaveacock'?

@Liberty AboveAllElse lol, that's the one, Baz & Mike

i expected *"wHY arE YOu gae?"* xD

Fuck, if I had women like that in my chair, I'd quit 😂

Genius

Lol👌

Made my day

Nisarg Sojitra aw cmon now you guys are making me blush ☺️

I love the word "mansplaining" it cracks me up ,it just makes the feminists seem dumber.

It's just projecting, they are almost always the ones womansplaining

They dont like double standards unless they are the beneficiary

yup... that's totaly true...

Well that becomes more of a hot topic . Very very hot one

Its a trigger for me when u are trying to articulate ur point and get hit with another idiotic ideology from these feminist. They don't listen they just yell their points

If that discussion triggers you so much, you are a pretty weak minded individual. Quite pathetic

@@TheWaross He sounds like a perfectly normal person to me. You however come painfully across as a standard issue liberal eccentric with the usual pseudo-moralistic hyperbole. Hope things get better for you, friend.

For real, imagine being a guest in a TV show, then you always become interrupted by the interviewers. Its okay to interrupt someone as long as you know your place and when you should interrupt. The way I see this is the interviewers being so fckn rude most of the time (not always)

uhh women just talk, they don't listen, even if they let you talk they don't listen to you, they actually only think about what they will say after the man finishes and they can't wait until he finishes.. bruh.

Exactly lmao, if anything her saying that goes against feminist ideology

I’m not a feminist but I think that the world does associate blue with boys and pink with girls, of course girls wear blue and guys wear pink but it’s just a concept that dates back in history.

@@Laurel.m_ak its funny because it was the opposite in history. Blue-Girls Pink-Boys. funny how that works huh

In her defence. That’s actually a specific reference to her former boss Harriet Harman who got flack from feminists for being patronising when she used pink busses and billboards to promote equality for women.

@@Dilkingt0nne And yet that identifies another hypocrisy of the new feminist movement. They speak as though all of them are strongly united, yet are willing to outcast any person who go against the radical left's rhetoric.

He could have messed with their heads by pointing out that everything that exists is "real".

The emptiness inside a cup exist,is it real?.i just wanna know the answer

@@a.bagasm.7253 The cup isn't empty if it has Air inside it. If it has no air , it has light, if it has no light it has gravity acting on on it.

That's *deep* .thanks

@@a.bagasm.7253 You might like this. It blew my mind when I first watched it kzfaq.info/get/bejne/maqdhKx_0dTYemg.html

աėšłęÿ his answer: NO 😂😂😂😂😂😂 Fuck me - 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Good point

աėšłęÿ there we go mate

Yeah that was the absolute dumbest baited response I've ever seen. Even before he said it I knew he'd disagree with the term "real," and I knew she'd put words in his mouth. Most conservatives actually care MORE about transexuals than most liberals, because they care more about ALL people than such liberals. Liberals just use these people for their collectivized political power it comes to identity politics

Good point

They are just ideas unless he can show evidence . Can one person have all the answers to society's problems?....No!

Isn't it sad that he even has to remind people. This world of ours is upside down. Wrong is now right and right is now wrong. How did this happen?

Same with the feminist movement

@@St_AngusYoung tolerance being manipulated by the intolerant.

@@Sandrocker exactly!!

Right, it's merely acknowledging, "I caught myself in the act of doing you wrong, but I'm going to go ahead and do it anyway!"

It's like cutting in front of someone in a line and saying sorry. Then not going to the back of the line

Sometimes a person talks a bit much and journalists must interrupt for the sake of time.

@@LisaMaryification ...and sometimes not, as is the case here. Peterson never spoke for more than 15 seconds at a time.

All do is interrupt , at every level of the narrative, they “reword” almost everything he says.🤣

The question itself is so pervert

It's questions like that, that make identity politics such a nightmare because everyone immediately assumes that they have the same beliefs on what a "Real" this, that or the other is.

The way he takes a second to decide to take the hard stance is great

@@arquier they are going against their own agenda. What in the world could be a 'real woman' without offending someone by defining that

cut cut cut

Me too. I dont have the will power to do so sadly :(

Nah his tone is calm but you can clearly see he's regretting having to kill his brain cells talking to these two asshats.

@@crablord7934 'LOL' exactly!

Soo true

me too , id say YOU're FUCKED and walk away , LMAO

Is that a Ben Shapiro reference

That statement is a paradox, in that the people who use it are the ones who are easily triggered 😁

I think this is precisely one of the things feminists are asking ni terms of mentality changes. To stop rationalise everything by facts and numbers all the time and start to accept that feelings intuition and sensibility are things that matter and take a big place in our society and must be taken in consideration on the public and private sphere. Sorry for my english :)

@@juliusb5404 facts don’t care about your feelings

@@juliusb5404 Without rationalization, we'd still be in the dark ages, calling for our count to feed us more...

WomanListening. FeminazisHearing.

Boo Radley that’s facts

Boo Radley typical liberal 😂

She is trying to attack him

Do they ever listen?

I'm sure if me and you was in the same room i wouldn't piss you off ... 💋🎀👸👸💁💁💁

@@zeni2432 dude wtffff😂😂😂

Jr Diax nah he right

@@crunchyoreos3006 ey no judge k? Cmon man. I like it weird.

@@crunchyoreos3006 yeah obviously 😂

He's at least two standard deviations above them, and is basically trying to explain calculus to a toddler.

A classic case of incompetence. To know you are incompetent at level 5 in something you have to gain essentially level 5 to see it

I think they are very much aware of what they are doing and are trying to dumb the conversation down to paint him in a negative light. I think he's significantly more intelligent than they are, but I don't think they are oblivious to it. I do find them to be idiots, but they are doing it on purpose for "hot sound bites".

I could literally see his points flying over their heads

My thoughts precisely. However I doubt that he often does TV interviews with people who approach his level of intelligence or eloquence. The demographic in TV personalities seems slightly narrow and cuts off around 20-30 IQ points short of his territory.

Yes that is what is call get it right hunny

@@sexydiva5460 What right sweetheart?

I prefer the old fashioned word “rude” which ironically is the same word I use to describe it when a man does it. Oh look at that...equality.

It should be called cuntsplaining

paleyoCS no

jamd Pact Sounds an awful lot like conservatives to me....

@@gene8172 ¡Peeero él tiene un buen punto! Sólo con este video puede mantener su argumento por ocho décadas; y yo que pensaba que el Feminismo argentino tomaba riendas muy extremistas.

@@gene8172 On what planet do you live? These are the traits of liberals, snowflakes, and feminists.

jamd Pact Maybr you’re confused with fascists, misogynists and white supremacists? But, hey, you do you.

@@gene8172 why do you keep bringing up the demoKKKrats? denial? never opened a history book? or your eyes?

Simple truth is I think logic has been curtailed and in its place is this emotionally charged out of control hysteria, I have just finished watching several of his videos so if I am sounding like Jordan I didn't intend to, where logic is more or less a luxury that gets thrown aside whenever the logic isn't working for you but against you. Militant atheism is a classic example of this. If the atheist isn't winning the argument logically then he resorts to troll tactics. I see anti- Christian groups doing the exact same thing in the exact same way. Look at how keyboard jihadis are going after guys like David Wood. It's sad because the whole purpose of logic is to create a method to get at the truth in many ways debaters should be looking forward to being wrong because yeah you had a set back in your conclusions but you got one step closer to the truth even if it's not a truth you would prefer it is still a truth.

@@asgaiyawaya3973 Agree. I call them the emotional mob. They are so emotionally invested in their beliefs, facts and logic are unnecessary. People are guilty until proven guilty, if they do not conform to the neo-marxist views.

It's all frontier justice here on the internet.

Conservative women tend to be more logical. Liberal women , not so much. Having said that , Women will always go the emotional hook if they cannot get their way using common sense. Time for you men to use their emotion against them. .@@asgaiyawaya3973

JP is right, people always use "their" logic, but they are wrong. It's like making a bad plan.

Exactly

Study true history... feminism, communism, fascism... all come from the same tribe of Babylonians claiming to be the Chosen People of God, and our Masters!

Same thing !

r/unexpectedcommunism

Accidently?

Its like when people punch you when you’re already knocked out, she has to win in any sense possible jeez.

Exactly

@Leroy B my guy

She's doing her job tbh, she seems to stand by his perception but if it was an agreeable interview there wouldn't be any debate cos the feminist is simply a representative figure as she's barely got anything relevant to say

@@Carteirapesada why do you feel it is her job to be disagreeable? If she has the result already loaded, it is not helpful in any way, both sides should be open minded to explore new ways of thinking. This is the biggest problem with left leaning politics these days, no critical thinking. Watch the talks he has with other guests on the Rubin Report and you will see how ideas can develop without pointless drama.

Cause that's what they do, they don't listen and criticize you because you don't bow down at their absurdity

I mean you have a very pleasent podcast with Joe Rogan, but yes I don't think thats an interview, more like a simple talk at a bar drinking some beers

That's what feminist do! Feminist ask questions they don't really want the answers to, they interrupt to shorten your answer, they talk over you thinking that's a win because you can't get your point across. That might work on their husbands but in the real world they just look childish.

So what you're saying is....

They did

@@skysolitude Exactly. He's combining belief with praxis, contemplation with action, inner and outer life harmony

Especially in the face of emotionally charged females; of both sexes. Men like JP are better, I think than those of us who would have the overwhelming urge to slap a b|+€H.

What arguments? Lol

This woman speaks as if Hillary has never done anything wrong, compaired to Trump's affair. Hillary says things just as rude as he does but these women give her a pass just because she is a woman. Both male and female do things wrong but feminist only see the males wrong but women get a pass just because they are NOT male. Feminist have become the things they started out blaming males for and they are just as wrong as the males were.

He has withheld many a bitchslap and I for one salute his patience.

A few days ago, I do not recognize this man. I do now, and I will give him a 👍🏻

Facts

The way he flinches when she says that

In every way too

Me too