Taken from Joe Rogan Experience #1208: • Joe Rogan Experience #...
Пікірлер: 7 600
@whatever3 жыл бұрын
*FUN FACT* The GQ interviewer (Helen Lewis) cheated on her now ex-husband and is divorced. She is a bit vague about the details, but admits that within 2 years of her marriage she "fell in love with someone else" (in other words she cheated on her husband).
@RyanShtirmer3 жыл бұрын
Funny, Peterson predicted they’d have issues in the interview
@flacjunkie55533 жыл бұрын
Um I tried googling but couldn't find anything so could you send a link or something?
@rkv63173 жыл бұрын
@@flacjunkie5553 refer to Personal Life
@flacjunkie55533 жыл бұрын
@@rkv6317 ahh found it.
@frizzyred12923 жыл бұрын
haha, the bloke got a lucky escape.
@hereLiesThisTroper3 жыл бұрын
Fun Fact: the most Liked comment on that GQ interview was comment that says, "I can't wait to not buy her book."
@Aaron-rd3cd3 жыл бұрын
That comment has since been deleted. He must’ve bought her book
@SA-be1bn3 жыл бұрын
@@Aaron-rd3cd No gq deleted it, get your facts right
@QixTheDS3 жыл бұрын
@@Aaron-rd3cd luckily there’s dozens more. And the replies are fucking primo
@chrisgould1013 жыл бұрын
Haha. Feminism
@liljimmy49403 жыл бұрын
They deleted his comment lmao
@boskind5152 жыл бұрын
This man helped me through depression and still is, I'll forever be grateful for his courage and humility.
@richfarfugnuven63082 жыл бұрын
God speed and good luck my friend.
@b.munhoz45382 жыл бұрын
✊
@dattrax7 Жыл бұрын
Same here. I can't imagine what he deals with. What an example to back up his ideas.
@sofiazanko93 Жыл бұрын
The amount of gratitude I feel towards Jordan Peterson is greater than one to perhaps anyone else I've ever got to listen to. Dragged me out of depression also.
@zapples11268 ай бұрын
Too bad you need an incel to help you through your bs. The world we be better off if you pulled a Ryan Dunn
@Felyx903 жыл бұрын
If jordan ever feels down about himself he would just need to read the comment section on every interview he´s been.
@elisagrace39663 жыл бұрын
I think he tends to filter out the comments stroking his ego and looks at the criticism, since he said he noticed comments about his impatience in the GQ video which I didnt notice at all.
@mostlyneutral2 жыл бұрын
@@elisagrace3966 It was clear that he interupted the woman a couple times. He shouldn't have done that, but he knows that.
@mindhunter912 жыл бұрын
@@elisagrace3966 yup whatever suits your narrative.
@angelomendoza66662 жыл бұрын
@@mostlyneutral Well, he was the one being interviewed so him talking more than her is naturally supposed to happen. Although interrupting is still unpleasant…
@frankjaeger17112 жыл бұрын
@@LWLProductions That and she was hostile from the beginning like JP said. He also only defended himself when she’d go off putting words in his mouth or twisting what he said etc. She said it’d be war so she got it didn’t she? Do you expect to be calm to someone who just threatened you? Even so he was still professional.
@joy-qc3cq4 жыл бұрын
Peterson: I like cats Interviewer: so you're saying we should kill dogs
@Tjalve704 жыл бұрын
Me, being the provocative åsshole that I am: "No. I didn't say that. I agree with it, but that's not what I said."
@fabiokaya2024 жыл бұрын
@AsSeenOnTV stfu poser
@bmd18254 жыл бұрын
That chick was the nail that met the Hammer of Peterson.
@nichola89694 жыл бұрын
ahaha
@noname-sk3hl4 жыл бұрын
Dude it's a about the GQ interview. I will suggest you watch it. The interviewer was being a d***
@drfalcon28495 жыл бұрын
Jordan Peterson isn't misunderstood. He is deliberately _misrepresented_ because he challenges the false feminist narratives so effectively. i.e. With actual facts and data and stuff.
@thelasso94785 жыл бұрын
Mr Chow he is misinterpreted by the vocal minority so he’s misunderstood by the uninformed majority
@davejacob52085 жыл бұрын
he himself misrepresents feminism. peterson once claimed that no feminists has stood up for women in the near east. which is wrong both in regard to women in the near east (obviously) but ALSO in regard to women in the west ! in the exact same speech an context he accused feminists of thinking "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" in regard to islam. but how dare someone say something bad about peterson...
@davejacob52085 жыл бұрын
@@Mr1987Joe "What are you talking about?" the same thing you are talking about: "Islam, at its core, is the single most anti-feminist thing on the planet." (...) "For some reason, however, feminists don't seem to like acknowledging this. They are avid supporters of Islam, as Islam has represented the figurative destruction of the Western culture they hate, for centuries. It is the literal, exact, perfect definition of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend." " these bullshit-claims are the things i am talking about. give me one peace of evidence for the claim that any relevant amount or example of feminists do not have a problem with islam. have fun trying overinterpreting NOT HATING EVERY MUSLIM as loving islam... "This man has become one of the figureheads of civil discourse in the present day! It's only lunatics that are unable to engage themselves in critical thinking that seem to have a problem with him." yeah, you are just proving that you are another sheeple of his cult... if you are never looking for his mistakes, of course you will never find one. anyone who goes to such extremes as "ONLY lunatics (...) seem to have a problem with him" should try FUCKING HARD to think again about whether the truth is really THAT ONE-SIDED...
@jacobmistake32815 жыл бұрын
Peterson keeps himself vague so he never has to address real criticisms
@drfalcon28495 жыл бұрын
@@jacobmistake3281 LOL You'd be joking right. Peterson has the most specific rebuttals to toxic feminism, citing scientific study and study that refutes feminist dogma.
@ralentinovossi80813 жыл бұрын
This man's ability to stay calm and collected is unreal.
@flowerofash44393 жыл бұрын
As if he is a God sent to humanity, a much needed person in this dark age, to say it lightly
@mohammadbuhamad77442 жыл бұрын
@@flowerofash4439 he is an exceptional man, stop the over exaggeration
@psychcowboy12 жыл бұрын
Calm and collected? You are joking right? He was rude and triggered the entire interview.
@mohammadbuhamad77442 жыл бұрын
@@psychcowboy1 not sure if serious
@psychcowboy12 жыл бұрын
@@mohammadbuhamad7744 That's your theory, thats a foolish theory, man alive how can you say something like that, no thats not right I know my neurochemistry lets go play neurochemistry...calm and collected? Give me a break. Let's get our definitions straight on identity politics...and then JP proceeds to not define identity politics. Whoops Jordan.
@canadianroot3 жыл бұрын
The best line from that GQ interview: "Read more!"
@psychcowboy13 жыл бұрын
Helen was right.
@canadianroot3 жыл бұрын
@@psychcowboy1 Bullshit. She tried to bait him at every turn. She wasn't even playing Devil's advocate. She was trying to embarrass him, but looked the fool, despite her articulateness. They tried hard to make him uncomfortable. Not even a glass of fucking water.
@brianmi403 жыл бұрын
JP: GQ Interview: "No one talked about identity politics 20 or 30 years ago, it's a new term." 34:48 "The term was coined by the Combahee River Collective in 1977.[4]" "It took on widespread usage in the early 1980s..." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_politics
@psychcowboy13 жыл бұрын
@@canadianroot At around 41:00 JP refers to research on lobster serotonin and on Marxism in academia. He refers to these papers to prove Helen wrong and he alleges that he studied them 'quite carefully'. He may have studied them carefully, but the problem is he still didn't understand them. Both papers actually prove Helen right: 1. Serotonin and Aggression Motivation in Crustaceans; lobsters injected with serotonin adopt aggressive postures and seek agonistic encounters, making Helen right. [Helen: It makes lobsters more aggressive. Paper: It makes lobsters more agonistic.] 2. Prevalence of Marxism in Academia; Marxism is a tiny minority faith at only 3%, making Helen right. [Helen: Not a widely held view. Paper: A tiny minority faith. Also JP falsely attributes the author as Jonathan Haidt.] Helen for the score on lobsters and Marxism! ===== At 1:17:00. Helen: What about renewable energy? JP: Good luck with that. JP: 'What kind of statement is it that the planet would be better off with fewer people? If you are concerned about your carbon footprint you can kill yourself.' Helen: What overpopulation has done... Peterson interrupting as usual: 'Who says we have overpopulation? We aren't going to run out of fossil fuels. We will top out at 9 billion, in 100 years there will be too few people.' [Let's unpack this. JP's insightful and useful commentary on such a huge issue as renewable energy is...good luck with that? Peterson is denying we have an over population problem? What a complete idiot, that statement is what inspired me to start checking the guy out. Peterson knows we will top out at 9 billion and we won't run out of fossil fuels and in 100 years there will be too few people? Doesn't this guy call himself a credible scientist? What is credible or scientific about any of his statements here?]
@psychcowboy13 жыл бұрын
@@brianmi40 Did Peterson define identity politics? He said let's get our definitions straight and it's a very specific thing... Then he proceeds to not define it. What an idiot.
@iknightley5 жыл бұрын
Joe “I will find a way to compare anything to martial arts” Rogan
@lutello30125 жыл бұрын
Joe "robot parrot audience" Rogan
@cwr86185 жыл бұрын
Ha!!!!
@namasteinbed7845 жыл бұрын
😂👌❤️
@musclepunched5 жыл бұрын
To be fair that's what he knows so makes sense
@richardstrage36825 жыл бұрын
Everybody always tries to connect it to what you know for simplicity.
@19Slim685 жыл бұрын
Jordan Peterson is a perfect example of an intellectual black belt.
@19Slim685 жыл бұрын
@@aenamabag Do you have any example?
@aenamabag5 жыл бұрын
@@19Slim68 Richard Wolff
@19Slim685 жыл бұрын
@@aenamabag What the hell are you talking about? Are you telling me that Jordan Peterson is cherry picking his opponents in his debates? By the way, I'd like to see a debate between Jordan Peterson and Richard Wolff.
@salamjihad34495 жыл бұрын
@@aenamabag LOL ARE YOU KIDDING ?? GO BACK TO SCHOOL !!!
@howzthat42085 жыл бұрын
Watch sam seders videos on him, woke!
@joaogranja66612 жыл бұрын
I met Jordan when he had an event in Portugal and he was so kind to everyone in line to meet him. He is a great human being spreading nothing but positivity and truth. I told him i got into russian literature because of him and i saw he was actually touched about it. Great experience
@hibaimene96842 жыл бұрын
lucky youuuu
@vidropartido2 жыл бұрын
Ele já cá veio em 2018. Infelizmente nessa altura ainda não o conhecia mas gostava muito de poder ter uma simples conversa com ele. Deve ser uma experiência para a vida.
@diasramos4988 Жыл бұрын
Faz sentido, Dostayesk ia gostar de conversar com esta man
@takamichisoares338 Жыл бұрын
Quando é que ele foi? E aonde??
@manojsrivastava36263 жыл бұрын
the best thing is At the later part of interview, She asks, " What is the most important thing to you in life?" To which Jordan Replied, "NOT BEING STUPID".
@leonardoscatizzi60232 жыл бұрын
"multiple orgasms"
@a.filakiewicz29422 жыл бұрын
"Read More" was badass
@psychcowboy12 жыл бұрын
@@a.filakiewicz2942 Helen was right on the read more spot. Alt right like Peterson.
@psychcowboy12 жыл бұрын
@cheff wallets So why is Peterson stupid so often?
@blinkjump87232 жыл бұрын
@@psychcowboy1 nice b8
@Shantanushetty334 жыл бұрын
He was out of water about 40 minutes into the interview, he held the empty glass in his hand twice, but was never offered a refill. At the 1 hour 20 minute mark the woman even held her glass full of water and put it down without even taking a sip when it was evident from Peterson's mouth movement that he was experiencing dry mouth. The lighting was such where a shadow was cast over peterson's eyes from many angles, that's something done to make a person seem less trust worthy and alter viewer perception. His mic was messed up probably on purpose to do the same. And Peterson still came out victorious.
@mrknarf44384 жыл бұрын
Thanks for pointing out all those. They're the kind of things one only notices subconsciously.
@goldrays48624 жыл бұрын
Also the doomed music at the end with the look of contempt on his face was a clear effort to skew public perception of him.
@Shantanushetty334 жыл бұрын
@@goldrays4862 Damn, I didn't notice that.
@MrCoops84 жыл бұрын
Lyla xo,the look of contempt on the face was all Peterson,I’m sure he knew how she was trying to paint him and that was his natural and just reaction,she seemed to lack intelligence with generic statements and a lack of courtesy for her GUEST :)
@elizabethabbott77754 жыл бұрын
you sound like a conspiracy theorist
@brettsiders76165 жыл бұрын
I live in Korea. I just found out "12 Rules" has been translated to Korean and that his lectures are gaining popularity in China and Japan. Dr. Peterson, I believe it's time to start considering an Asian tour.
@ultralinguistics30835 жыл бұрын
Agreed.
@pranshuanand45605 жыл бұрын
Yaas
@kikiSubarashii5 жыл бұрын
I live in Hong Kong and I would love to one of his lectures!
@fscorpion6785 жыл бұрын
He’d definitely be helpful in japan
@kasikasivendjinn53455 жыл бұрын
Please someone publish it in Taiwan
@posolokchauka42933 жыл бұрын
Jordan has helped me through depression. He speaks the type of truth that hurt before it heals
@rroughh2 жыл бұрын
Late comment, but listening to him encouraged me to learn the piano
@weazphoenix16562 жыл бұрын
@@rroughh I wish you good luck on learning the piano 👍
@shanice15493 жыл бұрын
I saw a comment under another video saying, " he's the father for fatherless children" & I felt that. I see where alot of ppl listened & love his messages & have had life changing situations after. I appreciate this man
@Leopar5254 жыл бұрын
The amount of respect Joe Rogan has for Jordan is obvious... and that makes me so much more respectful for Joe...
@rm21243 жыл бұрын
Joe Rogan is what people should strive to be in terms of being open minded and open to discussion.
@dublplus33323 жыл бұрын
Pffft. Rogan is a sellout two faced jellybean. He doesnt stand for anything. Being open minded is great, dont get me wrong. And appreciating Peterson is easy, the man is brilliant. But as soon as the hypothetical next guest were to trash Peterson, Rogans wide open mind would swallow it whole. Rogan is no role model.
@notashark51893 жыл бұрын
@@dublplus3332 Well, you don't want your guests to feel agitated or uncomfortable right?
@SA-be1bn3 жыл бұрын
@@dublplus3332 Ya it really makes me sad when he does stuff like that.
@garrywhitelaw87233 жыл бұрын
@@dublplus3332 you wanna be the guy who shoots down Joe Rogan.
@NorthWalesKid4 жыл бұрын
Guest: I want to talk about bacon sandwiches Joe Rogan: Brazilian jiu jutsu
@randomwalk61744 жыл бұрын
Citizen Kane haha. 🤣 There seems to always be a link to martial arts
@bibigreen65334 жыл бұрын
@@randomwalk6174 there always is!
@johnyepthomi8924 жыл бұрын
😆😆😆👍
@adamzoubi964 жыл бұрын
I love juijitsu and I'm starting to get annoyed by joe mentioning in every conversation. I can only imagine how people who don't like the sport feel! 😂
@conceptualmessiah014 жыл бұрын
@@adamzoubi96 I feel nothing.
@MarkieMX3 жыл бұрын
Loved when he asked her "If you hate the system, then give your job to someone less privileged" "Well I don't think that would really help the situation....." 😂😂😂
@psychcowboy12 жыл бұрын
Helen won.
@kchilz322 жыл бұрын
@@psychcowboy1 you must be trolling
@psychcowboy12 жыл бұрын
@@kchilz32 Nope I am just the only person who paid attention.
@shakespearsplat2 жыл бұрын
@@psychcowboy1 I wouldn’t say she ‘won’. I wouldn’t even know what that would mean. But I do seem to be a part of an extremely small minority here on KZfaq who found Jordan to be the one who came across as hostile in the interview. I’ve watched it like 4 times and she made her case rather decently. On the partiarchy discussion for example, Jordan basically made the point that the way to look at history as if it consisted of a tyrannical patriarchy would be horrible, and wouldn’t do you any good. But that’s not an argument though, is it? There were way more points than this, but I thought that Helen did fine. I remember the first time watching it, I was like this huge JBP fan and thought he’d ‘won’ as well, but the more I watched it and tried being as neutral as I could be, the more I could see that they were just opposites from each other - the one not neccesarily ‘better’ than the other.
@psychcowboy12 жыл бұрын
@@shakespearsplat Peterson interrupted her every other sentence. He was arrogant with a fragile ego. I know my neurochemistry, let's play neurochemistry. He goes into a lengthy statement on how he chose lobsters to address Marxism, and Helen notes that he chose lobsters to address Marxism...he denies it, apparently just to be disagreeable. JP fans however would rather just swallow the whole pill rather than pay attention to what actually happened.
@chrismac22343 жыл бұрын
I met Helen a few years ago. Im afraid she is exactly how you would imagine.
@jjunit2074 жыл бұрын
Joe "I WILL be made fun of in the comments section no matter what I do" Rogan
@michaelhood21094 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this 😂
@crawford10834 жыл бұрын
Quite right too. Shiny-headed shaven-headed slaphead bald feckers deserve it,
@tensegritywill4 жыл бұрын
Nice!
@declaniii63243 жыл бұрын
I mean... he’s just such an easy person to make jokes at the expense of
@JesusFriedChrist3 жыл бұрын
Most accurate one to date ☝🏼
@jamesron56253 жыл бұрын
I'm a simple man. I saw Joe Rogan and Jordan Peterson in the same video. I smoked DMT and started doing my chores.
@glengamble5262 жыл бұрын
And ate some lobster…?
@lilbaby_12 жыл бұрын
very simple
@jamesron56252 жыл бұрын
@@glengamble526 Yes some lobsters and elk meats! :)
@jamesron56252 жыл бұрын
@@lilbaby_1 Life is simple but we make it so hard.
@johnoconnor81052 жыл бұрын
Brilliant!
@jondoe3843 жыл бұрын
JP is truly 1 in 7 billion. The way he lays his feeling and thoughts out for others to respond to, while at the same time being so calculated is absolutely astonishing.
@psychcowboy12 жыл бұрын
Helen won the interview.
@Hybred2 жыл бұрын
@@psychcowboy1 In what regard? She would say I disagree with you then Jordan would explain why she's wrong and she'd typically just say "I agree" after and move on because she didn't even understand the viewpoints being opposed that she's been taught to despise so he just framed it in a different way. That's not called winning
@psychcowboy12 жыл бұрын
@@Hybred You found a Peterson win? Where? Were there any Peterson wins? Here are a couple of Helen wins, starting at like 41:00. 1. Helen: It works in two different ways, it makes lobsters more aggressive and it makes humans less aggressive.' Peterson interrupting: No that's not right, it makes humans less aggressive...It makes a lobster more likely to fight again.' [uh Whoops Jordan. She agreed with you that serotonin makes humans less aggressive, and she is wrong... for agreeing with you? Lobsters that want to fight are not displaying aggression? Fighting isn't aggression? The relevant paper is called Serotonin and Aggression Motivation in Crustaceans, concluding that serotonin makes lobsters adopt aggressive postures...SCORE: Helen 1, Jordan 0] 2."I chose lobsters, the reason I made that argument was to put paid to the absurd Marxist proposition that hierarchical structures are a secondary consequence of free market economies which is as preposterous a theory as you could have about anything.' Helen: 'Lobsters say the thing that you ideologically want to talk about that your belief that there is a kind of Marxist ideology...' Peterson interrupting: 'How do lobsters say that?' [Uh what Jordan? You just explained how lobsters demonstrate that. Remember you chose lobsters to put rest to the absurd Marxist proposition, and now you are saying lobsters don't put to rest the absurd proposition? Remembering what you said 2 minutes ago can be super challenging I know.] SCORE: Helen 2, Jordan 0 3. Helen referring to equality of outcome: 'I don't think that is a widely held view.' JP Interrupting as usual: 20% of social scientist identify as Marxist. Look it up in Haidt's work, I studied it quite carefully, it is a perfectly valid statistic. [Heads up JP, in the survey you are referring to, 3% of college professors identify as Marxist, and you claim that universities are dominated by leftist ideology, thus 3% of a very Left leaning sample identify as Marxist... and you are disagreeing with Helen? Whoops. The study Prevalence of Marxism in Academia states that Marxism is 'A tiny minority faith', i.e. Peterson cited a study to prove Helen wrong, when it actually proved her right. SCORE: Helen 3, Jordan 0]
@Sam-nb1rm2 жыл бұрын
@@Hybred bro that girl is a troll she is trying to comment on everything single JP's video with the same groundless message
@Hybred2 жыл бұрын
@@psychcowboy1 You commented on another thread of this exact video saying "Helen Won" 7 months ago and then I clicked on this comment that's only one month old saying the same exact thing. You keep coming back to this video to comment the same thing then copy and paste the same arguments. I read the entire thread this comment is literally just pasted from it, I'm not going to argue with someone who devotes their life to this and also who's arguments have already been addressed, just want to point out how creepy you are. Why do you either hate JP or love Helen so much? That's the only thing anyone should care about after seeing your dedication.
@meem5273 жыл бұрын
She was ready to go on the attack. She was awful, a terrible interviewer
@brianmi403 жыл бұрын
JP: GQ Interview: "No one talked about identity politics 20 or 30 years ago, it's a new term." 34:48 "The term was coined by the Combahee River Collective in 1977.[4]" "It took on widespread usage in the early 1980s..." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_politics
@marksaus3 жыл бұрын
I dunno Marilyn... I watched the interview after reading all the comments and reactions and was expecting something much worse. As Joe Rogan says, I found her much more eloquent, reasonable and respectful than other interviewers like Cathy Newman. Helen Lewis had an agenda, wanted to catch him out, had views that I find absurd, but she listened to him, responded to his arguments. She is clearly a radical feminist, but at least she's an articulate one! I don't get why people (and Jordan) found that interview so terrible. Don't get me wrong, it was a bad interview and her actions were reprehensible, but was it really THAT bad? :-)
@billhawkins1923 жыл бұрын
"Arguing" is how we learn. We tend to be over emotional and it becomes an "argument". Do it respectfully and it's a debate - and we all learn and get better. Newman (ha ha) only argued. Miss Unfaithful (Jordan predicted this - suspecting she'd have challenging relationships) at least debated and evaluated what he said/she heard.
@chrisgould1013 жыл бұрын
Likely a disgusting person too. She seems like a squawking banshee
@LawsofPaul2 жыл бұрын
@@brianmi40 He literally stated minutes earlier in that interview that identity politics started in the 1970s. That statement was him saying it has become popularized recently. Way to reinforce Joe Rogan’s statement that he’s the most misquoted man.
@seldomseendave57834 жыл бұрын
I loved that interview. The part when he threw the privilege narrative back at her was delicious.
@robertcwchin58724 жыл бұрын
@@julianfischer1485 around 17:00 - 17:35 minutes in that particular interview, I guess.
@aquilaaltaire30073 жыл бұрын
Dave Chappelle on the notion of privileged white women: "Lady, you knew what you were doing. You were in on the heist, you just didn't like your cut." 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@Takobella3 жыл бұрын
It was great. I'm a feminist but she's an example of privileged white feminists who want to shit on others but not hold themselves to the same standard
@figy12883 жыл бұрын
@@julianfischer1485 to
@scottwall84193 жыл бұрын
I thought the whole argument was nuts. Isn't the magazine called Gentlemens Quarterly? Why was a woman doing the interview in the first place? Nothing says white woman provelage like doing an interview for a mens magazine and throwing shade at a man. Gees
@ybbob695 жыл бұрын
Love what you've done with your hair in this one Joe
@SpoilerAlert__5 жыл бұрын
What hair
@doesntmatter44775 жыл бұрын
Misunderestimated comment^ 10/10
@mr.bigglesworth19705 жыл бұрын
Golden
@mazklassa93385 жыл бұрын
Er what hair lol
@thomasohanlon72565 жыл бұрын
Fuck sake 😂
@thescottishmob3 жыл бұрын
I think Joe gave her too much praise. She certainly wasn’t some intellectual juggernaut. Also “can’t wait to not buy her new book” 😂✌️
@berniestephens45062 жыл бұрын
Even JP praised her intellect. She’s an intelligent woman with well thought out and researched points. JP also admits he became unstuck and was not as calm throughout the interview. This interview is out there for all to see forever and he doesn’t like that. He tries to discredit her here “coldness” “we’re going to go to war” - but then later admits not in those words. He NEEDS to discredit her - she’s highlighted his frailties all in camera.
@AussieZeKieL2 жыл бұрын
@@berniestephens4506 She definitely got under Petersons skin. But there’s a reason why people know who Jordan Peterson is and then refer to the interviewer as the Jordan Peterson GQ interview.
@berniestephens45062 жыл бұрын
@@AussieZeKieL Right, what does that prove? 🤷♂️
@AussieZeKieL2 жыл бұрын
@@berniestephens4506 that people don’t see value in her opinion.
@berniestephens45062 жыл бұрын
@@AussieZeKieL Or is it that more males buy into his opinion? He says it himself, “the majority of KZfaq users (where he gets these views) are young males (the majority of his support)” So the stats are skewed if you’re judging by KZfaq and social media views. People who agree with Helen Lewis etc are more likely to read papers, magazines and news pages - after all, she’s a journalist, not a social media pundit like JP has become over the last few years…
@TankGirl892 жыл бұрын
Jordan Peterson has definitely helped me with a better outlook and view of the world and I am forever grateful thank you!
@Julie-hu5kb2 жыл бұрын
Thank you ☺️ for supporting Jordan Peterson I do love seeing females girls and women being helped by Jordan Peterson
@n_b74675 жыл бұрын
People forget that Jordan Peterson was shoved into the spotlight, he didn't choose it. This guy is just doing what he was doing beforehand, teaching people about psychological and philosophical concepts he thinks are important and helpful to others. His life purpose is to help people, he chose that long before a couple years ago when he popped up on KZfaq arguing with college students.
@mdusibisi5 жыл бұрын
The problem is in certain aspects, he's wrong and misguided. He's not a very good psychologist if he doesn't simple intersectionality. The same intersectionality that's used in Epidemiology.
@n_b74675 жыл бұрын
@@mdusibisi I don't really know what that is. I'm not actually a very developed thinker or know much about these social issues that plague us. If you could elaborate I'd appreciate it. I will say I've grown less fond of Peterson since thinking more for myself. Same thing with Sam Harris. The public intellectual phenomenon is overrated. I'm also over Joe Rogan for the most part. The whole "let's talk about stuff I don't understand" over and over week by week is a little lacking, these podcasts are kind of shallow compared to a lot of the topics discussed in them.
@Merthalophor5 жыл бұрын
Noone choses to step into the spotlight, that's not something you do. You get offered a spot there by the public, and you either accept or decline. Jordan accepted it and kept on posting lectures online, publishing books and giving interviews. It's not like he's forced into the studio.
@n_b74675 жыл бұрын
@@Merthalophor yeah I thought about it more later and agree with you.
@HarryBalzak5 жыл бұрын
He popped up on youtube after condemning and opposing canada instituting compelled speech laws.
@loud70704 жыл бұрын
Jordan is a human necessity. He has been battling health issue recently, hoping he gets well sooner than later.
@Grappapappa2 жыл бұрын
I hope that too! Still, I just don't understand how he started to take bentsos. Even the worst addict knows you should stay the hell away from them.
@ifhollick3 жыл бұрын
I watched that GQ interview, I thought JBP was upset from the beginning. After listening to this talk with Joe Rogan it makes total sense. I still loved his points in that interview. God Bless you Dr!
@GameSpyDarkAge3 жыл бұрын
I'd run out of patience too if people were constantly making me out to be something I'm not.
@matthewwynn30255 жыл бұрын
"They hated Jesus because he spoke the truth" - shiny head man
@boppe22354 жыл бұрын
Bike is short for bicheal - Jesus
@archelt94964 жыл бұрын
- pot smoking bald man
@ItsEricaBeyetch4 жыл бұрын
Isnt joe an atheist??
@ayy42624 жыл бұрын
Nunya no
@Michael_000014 жыл бұрын
It's a parable about a guy that never existed. But we get what you're saying.
@Gwmcmi024 жыл бұрын
The exchange where Lewis acknowledges her privilege but declined JP’s suggestion to exchange her position with someone less privileged was an intellectual black belt round house kick to the face.
@TheAuraOfItAll4 жыл бұрын
And the greatest irony is she probably didn't realise the hypocrisy of what she said either.
@taunokekkonen57334 жыл бұрын
A white middle-aged woman with a solid job is the most priviledged person in history so she's smart enough to admit it. She's also right in declining to exchange her position, but I'm not sure if it was for the right reason. The right answer is "oh, I quite enjoy my priviledged life and I won't trade it with anyone. I've also earned it as my position is based on competence and not power or oppression". Instead she said about spreading the wealth etc etc total BS, since anyone who she traded the job for likely would do the same in their circles.
@ElanaVital833 жыл бұрын
Hey, I'm a broke woman of color. She needs to give me her job.
@vcarr64333 жыл бұрын
That was a great moment. She stumbled a little because it was so absurd to her. #equalityofoutcome
@psychcowboy13 жыл бұрын
Was Peterson smart in this interview? Like where?
@sharonalbanese80843 жыл бұрын
This man is a legend. I love his brilliant mind and pure heart.
@amath28203 жыл бұрын
I watched that interview the other night and I thought it a masterclass on how to deal with someone who has an underlying hostility and prejudice. He countered her hostility and ambush tactics with honesty, great knowledge and facts and figures he seemed to retrieve from the air. She in no way was able to cope with his greater intellect and truthfulness. I watched her face become whiter and whiter during the interview and I must say I was cheering him at the end. Jordan Peterson did not give her an inch and remained direct and focused. Well done!
@psychcowboy13 жыл бұрын
Peterson had honesty knowledge and facts? Where?
@classycassi202 жыл бұрын
@@psychcowboy1 🤡
@xxxgreyhookkickjxxx32952 жыл бұрын
@@psychcowboy1 literature on egalitarian societies, about serotonin, hierarchies, how problems like the wage gap are compartmentalised to fit a narrative etc
@psychcowboy12 жыл бұрын
@@xxxgreyhookkickjxxx3295 True those are examples of Peterson commenting on reality, as opposed to when he doesn't. Hierarchies are a third of a billion years old you can't blame them on capitalism and the West. Heads up Jordan, everyone knows that hierarchies are a third of a billion years old and no one is blaming them on capitalism and the West. Egalitarian measures move women further into their traditional vocational roles. Sorry Jordan,100% wrong for the US. Neurotransmitters like serotonin affect behavior. True Jordan. Scientists figured that out. 41:00 Plenty of Motivation] Helen: It makes lobsters more aggressive and humans less aggressive...Peterson interrupting: No that's not right. It makes humans less aggressive and lobsters more willing to fight. I know my neurochemistry. Let's check up on Peterson 'I know my neurochemistry' from the source paper on lobsters and serotonin: "Here we show that injection of serotonin into the hemolymph of subordinate, freely moving animals results in a renewed willingness of these animals to engage the dominants in further agonistic encounters." [agonistic. Adjective. Having a predisposition to fight or engage in confrontations. combative. belligerent. bellicose. aggressive. pugnacious.] Helen referring to equality of outcome: 'I don't think that is a widely held view.' JP Interrupting as usual: 20% of social scientist identify as Marxist. I studied it quite carefully look it up in Haidt's work. [In the study, 3% of college professors identify as Marxist, and it is not by Haidt. Helen for the score on lobsters and Marxism! ==================== JP... Plenty of them are saying there should be no such thing as hierarchies. Plenty of them Jordan? Find me one.
@psychcowboy12 жыл бұрын
@@xxxgreyhookkickjxxx3295 JP at 20:30 Helen: 'A female dominated office leaves men feeling left out. JP: How do we get to something that isn't a tyrannical patriarchy, if it is composed of mostly women and its a tyrannical patriarchy and if it is composed of mostly men it is a tyrannical patriarchy we are out of options.... [Holy crap Jordan you have some serious voices going on in your head. Helen said absolutely nothing about women dominated is a tyrannical patriarchy, she corrected your vocabulary problem, dominated by women is a matriarchy dude. Neither did she say we have a tyrannical patriarchy. She said the patriarchy was overthrown by the women's movement and women now have almost equal rights with men.] ============= Peterson at 19:00: 'That's for sure it's purely not, when you define it as tyrannical patriarchy implies unidimensional...' [Whoops Jordan, remember in the dave rubin john anderson interview when you said the West is an oppressive patriarchy but not purely that? Contradiction alert'] What if the patriarchy is composed of women is it still a patriarchy? [Helen corrects JP by stating that would be a matriarchy, score for Helen.] 'We take a patriarchal structure like the medical profession and we fill it with women, is it that it is mostly men that makes it a patriarchy, if it is a structure that is composed of women then it is also a tyrannical patriarchy, if it is composed of women and it is a tyrannical patriarchy... [What a total idiot. She just corrected you that composed or dominated primarily of women is a matriarchy. So after denying that we have a patriarchy numerous times in this interview you are now admitting that the medical field is a patriarchy?]
@CreossCross5 жыл бұрын
Anyone else think it’s super weird seeing joe without his headphones?
@calum91245 жыл бұрын
It's beautiful
@DLDmaster5 жыл бұрын
@@calum9124 LOL
@DLDmaster5 жыл бұрын
If your head shines like his, it's best to keep it hidden so that you can treasure it.
@DLDmaster5 жыл бұрын
@NextLeveLhumaNPC Peterson came with beards, so he greeted with fresh shave. Also no headphones.
@Peadeymclovin5 жыл бұрын
I didn't even know he had ears😂
@lubobaggins7674 жыл бұрын
I can’t see how he is so misunderstood. He’s excellent.
@belvinnadar57824 жыл бұрын
He's deliberately misinterpreted by far leftist politicians and SJW's.
@samboelguapo68264 жыл бұрын
He has a brilliant mind for sure.
@erhaboriE4 жыл бұрын
He needs a long form panel to explore his ideas. With short interviews, he isn't given much time to explain anything that needs even an ounce of nuisance. Classic example was his whole 'chaos is classified as female' and then 'antidote to chaos'. Sounds bad until you listen to him talk about what he means.
@salamander24684 жыл бұрын
People want to misinterpret him lol. I'm seeing people say in these comments that he's an insidious force that wants to harm things like women's rights and trans right, when all he's doing is tackling the radical ideologies that have surfaced and have harmful potential to society. People are so willing to hate on anybody because somehow it validates them as a person, so you can only imagine how as JP tackles SJWs even more people would hate him
@drummerdoingstuff50204 жыл бұрын
So are you! I agree.
@maximuswedgie51493 жыл бұрын
Jordan Peterson has helped so many many people, he is truly a great man
@elissetteg583 жыл бұрын
She was indeed hostile I could even feel her intense vibe coming off while Jordan was respectful until he got fed up and told her “read more” 🤣🤣🤣🤣 he had enough
@Chris-kt9yq4 жыл бұрын
"She was hostile the second I walked in. She told me we were gonna have a war. There was a coldness to her. She had a chip on her shoulder" ......Oh a feminist
@voidisvirtue87094 жыл бұрын
metalrave obvious to you but to man like Jordan was a little shocked because he doesn’t immediately judge someone. He gives everyone a chance including himself to understand where they are coming from. He never looks like he enjoys any of the conflicts he finds himself in. It’s all over his face that he is not having a good time. He does it anyway which is pretty much the definition of courage.
@austinbeshers54774 жыл бұрын
Aka she brought up points I had absolutely no answer for
@robspear034 жыл бұрын
@@austinbeshers5477 Points? Ha! Hokay, bud.
@deepalijoshi46314 жыл бұрын
@@austinbeshers5477 hahahahaha
4 жыл бұрын
austin beshers Please explain how somebody answers to nonsense.
@truthseeker41284 жыл бұрын
I remember when GQ used to be a men's magazine... now it's some sort of new age, feminist, metro-sexual horse crap.
@dancer14 жыл бұрын
Truth Seeker 😂
@fonziegee4 жыл бұрын
I think it may have to do with Anna Wintour (Vogue USA) being creative director for all Conde Nast publications since a few years now, basically dictating the "flow" and philosophy that the different publications should have. I think that explains a lot in and of itself, not that she is that type of "feminist" at all (she is an extremely intelligent woman that got by because of that and determination, certainly not for playing the victim card), she is just probably catering to her markets, magazines are mostly read by women, how would they react if they found their boyfriend magazines were talking about issues in a different way? And find out both publications are from the same media company? They'd stop reading, she probably prefers mens magazines to suffer a little as long as their target market remains fully engaged.
@KGS9224 жыл бұрын
@@fonziegee 👍
@tc22413 жыл бұрын
Not to be an ass, but what dictates a ‘Men’s’ magazine? Because a lot of that old stuff was crap too. Basically a giant ad for ‘why your tiny dick ain’t cutting it without this watch’. Men’s health used to be pretty decent.
@johndoran32393 жыл бұрын
An Einstein in a world of teletubbies
@JunglecatBlessing3 жыл бұрын
The last few years. Sometimes it was very easy to believe that all those who fight the good fight gave up. But when I see Joe and Jordan in the same room. I know I'm still amongst strong people who care about us.
@austinspaghetti40032 жыл бұрын
Jordan Peterson is amazing. He has a factual, responsible and respectful approach. Learned to take care of my life and my own actions before worrying about others. Self care is truly a careless act.
@Ragnar-Viking4 жыл бұрын
The look in Jordan's eyes during that interview was he will not be beat by her or anyone. He was amazing
@evanedwards7743 жыл бұрын
I was gonna like but 69😎
@brianmi403 жыл бұрын
JP: GQ Interview: "No one talked about identity politics 20 or 30 years ago, it's a new term." 34:48 "The term was coined by the Combahee River Collective in 1977.[4]" "It took on widespread usage in the early 1980s..." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_politics
@komay3 жыл бұрын
@@brianmi40 That wikipedia article is actually wrong in comparison to its source for that line. Citation 6: Page 150. 'It was only in the 1990s and thereafter that the term was used to apply to a broader array of interest groups and that it entered mainstream political discourse.' Peterson is correct.
@brianmi403 жыл бұрын
@@komay Now buy a calculator: the 90s started 31 years ago... "No one talked about identity politics 20 or 30 years ago, it's a new term." PETERSON IS WRONG.
@komay3 жыл бұрын
@@brianmi40 agree to disagree, I hear it as an exaggeration, you would never have heard of identity politics 10 years ago as much as you do now so it's easily imaginable it was a very tiny thing in the 90s too
@jakemitchell16715 жыл бұрын
Folks....the "weird" difference you're seeing with Joe is he's not wearing his headphones. Huge difference.
@JonnyUnderrated5 жыл бұрын
is that why my pee pee has a half chub?
@aricwood8695 жыл бұрын
My God
@RainChip5 жыл бұрын
It's entirely possible.
@skyboylho3 жыл бұрын
i just came from that interview. what a relief to listen to reasonable people.
@halocheck13 жыл бұрын
the word "reasonable" spikes an idea in my mind, there really appears to be a lack of reasonable people.
@psychcowboy12 жыл бұрын
@@halocheck1 Helen won.
@dangeles952 жыл бұрын
Man I love Dr JP. I love seeing him in laid back conversations bc he looks relaxed and more comfortable.
@haggissupper.14455 жыл бұрын
Joe rogan just went 110% bald.
@DirtSpud5 жыл бұрын
@@TheSmilodon85 wow . . .great joke
@DennisAlexioAndyHug5 жыл бұрын
FOR REAL WTF
@TheCoffeeNut7115 жыл бұрын
Jesus, that is almost Saitama bald
@adam.maqavoy5 жыл бұрын
@jackmccormick Nope, just No.
@MrJH1015 жыл бұрын
Lol Joe took off the usual headphones that he wears. That’s why he looks more bald than usual, but that’s actually just what he looks like.
@johnkirkpatrick14723 жыл бұрын
Wish Jordan Peterson had been one of my professors.
@kabirsaxena51882 жыл бұрын
He is if you're watching his lectures 😁
@aaronward51942 жыл бұрын
You can be the professor others need right now my brother, truly
@bentaylor49483 жыл бұрын
I like what joe did here. He translated Peterson’s experience into what he knows (martial arts) and I just really like that mutual appreciation. I think that’s just good interviewer/conversation technique
@grahamserle79303 жыл бұрын
How can you not like a person that speaks a lot of common sense and has integrity running through their veins.
@1jw2985 жыл бұрын
I had to wear sunglasses while watching this.
@georgemargaris5 жыл бұрын
1jw2 , I put on my solar eclipse goggles. Take care!
@JonnyUnderrated5 жыл бұрын
Snow glasses are in now
@insanezombieman7535 жыл бұрын
Embrace the shine you fools don't try to hide from it
@megamixa5 жыл бұрын
That was the first thing I saw. Joe's head is looking extra shiny today. I think he's trying to mesmerize Jordan with his crystal ball.
@nickking-edwards93015 жыл бұрын
😂😎
@stickyblicky115 жыл бұрын
Joe "Misunderestimated" Rogan
@markmallecoccio45215 жыл бұрын
Joe "Dubya" Rogan
@dylanknight67765 жыл бұрын
You beat me to it😂
@bluemiltank5 жыл бұрын
Would've bet on this being here
@pictishblood56885 жыл бұрын
Joe "85 IQ score" Hogan.
@donloskot48985 жыл бұрын
Yogi-berraism
@erikiacopelli4513 жыл бұрын
I love Mr.Peterson dude is just awesome n I watched n listened to everything I can find about him n his shows n talks hes had
@zeerust20003 жыл бұрын
It was a brilliant interview on Peterson's part. One of my favourites.
@bobbysmokeysignals6264 жыл бұрын
Thank God for Jordan Peterson. He’s reason in a world of emotional derangement.
@paulg62744 жыл бұрын
The primary derangement being God
@betacuck31453 жыл бұрын
@@paulg6274 get off this channel silly libtard
@Fulgrim_The_Phoenician3 жыл бұрын
I think he gets misunderstood from both ends. Most clips about Jordan Peterson on youtube are about ' peterson destroys feminist' or 'Peterson owns leftists'. If someone would look him up on youtube for the first time, he/she would probably get a totally wrong impression about him. He is a intellectuel, not some kind of weapon against radical left.
@aquilaaltaire30073 жыл бұрын
Yes! The titles of his clips are usually clickbait, so when you actually watch them you're going in with either a pissed off attitude or a smug one depending on if you're left or right. But the content of his lectures are not about that! He gets misrepresented by a lot of his own fans too. It's really frustrating.
@iordannelucas3 жыл бұрын
“In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” ― George Orwell
@Fulgrim_The_Phoenician3 жыл бұрын
@@iordannelucas 'I am the Walrus' - Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov
@Tommy19777773 жыл бұрын
he even admits that. however he has become more of a centrist. in the interest of maintaining that balance, he comes out against the left more often. the reason for this is centered on what he said once: "When we talk about how far the Right can go we have clearly defined boundaries. the Nazis were accused of being far right. the nazis advocated genocide so we say 'ok. you are no longer a part of the conversation'...but when we discuss the left, we have no such limits."
@psychcowboy13 жыл бұрын
Can you give an example of him being an intellectual in the GQ interview?
@beetotheay57832 жыл бұрын
Jordan Peterson’s intelligence is so incredibly attractive. I could sit and listen to him for hours. His brilliance has stirred my interest in learning again. I can’t get enough of his lectures & interviews.
@psychcowboy1 Жыл бұрын
Peterson said something intelligent and brilliant?
@muhammadputera659310 ай бұрын
@@psychcowboy1absolutely, cowboy.
@psychcowboy110 ай бұрын
@@muhammadputera6593 We continue our quest for an intellectual idea by Peterson. Did you find one?
@SW-hj5uh3 жыл бұрын
Watching this again over a year later and I can't get past seeing Joe without headphones.
@janm81415 жыл бұрын
Hairdresser: how we cuttin'? Joe Rogan: turn my head into a mirror please
@IfthiAli5 жыл бұрын
Say no more fam
@adam.maqavoy5 жыл бұрын
@janmadejdude, f$@%! cut this shit off = If you, do not like it - Turn it off/change video. There are some ppl/folks that listens to this person for a reason.
@buckshee5 жыл бұрын
Jan Madej Or as he would pronounce it “a mear”
@vinniedisco75 жыл бұрын
As a bald man, I’m offended. As a fan of comedy, I say well done.
@MazBringsby5 жыл бұрын
LMAO
@stackupbreachclear46793 жыл бұрын
That GQ interview was epic, I swear she had JBP’s mic turned down, her positions still seemed flawed. He was also denied water during his interrogation.
@olddnkinobi57583 жыл бұрын
He was also denied water during his interrogation 😂🤣 Yes twice
@ahmetbaturalpmirzabey51413 жыл бұрын
Interrogation, yes
@psychcowboy12 жыл бұрын
@@olddnkinobi5758 he was not denied water, he wasn't given a bad mic, he wasn't lit badly..read more.
@Zaxamaphone2 жыл бұрын
@@psychcowboy1 lol I've just watched a couple JBP videos recently and your replies are everywhere. He be living rent free in your head for sure haha
@cutmeloosebruce19552 жыл бұрын
@@psychcowboy1 he absolutlely was, he raised an empty glass twice and was given no water, he did have a much worse mic than her, and he was sitting in a dark corner compared to her sitting in a perfectly lit part of the room.
@TheosMessage2 жыл бұрын
Peterson pretty much called her an NPC during that interview
@eagleheart26ify2 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂 This comment deserves more likes
@davidkonevky73722 жыл бұрын
Is he wrong tho?
@ardechey3 жыл бұрын
The thing I love about JP is that he takes his time to really answer a question and doesn’t shy away from them. There’s nothing more frustrating than people refusing to admit they don’t know something or deflecting a question completely if they don’t like it.
@Nsypski5 жыл бұрын
She was hostile before the interview deliberately to make the interview tense. That's sad, I wish JP wouldve revealed this sooner.
@Nsypski5 жыл бұрын
@carollois65 no, revealed. JP came off looking like a bully, and that's because we didn't know the context and atmosphere in the room.
@MrJamberee4 жыл бұрын
She wasn't trying to make it tense. That wasn't a consideration and would not help her achieve her goal. She just decided she was going to try to destroy him, but that she would be successful where others had failed. She failed miserably.
@bluewrenreilly1294 жыл бұрын
@@Nsypski No way did he look like a bully are you serious. He just demolished her with his superior knowledge and yes intellect.,as well as his humor. Even without knowing her pre-interview antagonism, her attitude was obvious. he handled her well very professionally.
@adrianalexandrov77304 жыл бұрын
Interrogation. British GQ wrote that she *interrogated* him in the video description )) kzfaq.info/get/bejne/r8CJhNOYype7Zac.html
@drummerdoingstuff50204 жыл бұрын
I think the point is without the context of the environment she didnt want us to know was she tried to act calm and collected on camera but wanted to fire him up off before they started so he would look like he wasn't and she was. Its was a tactic to help attack his character even though he handled it very well. People who get heated and aggravated in a debate can sometimes look bad against a person who is cool and calm.
@displaychicken5 жыл бұрын
My favorite part of the GQ interview was when said something to the effect of “I can already tell what you believe on every issue, you could be replaced with any other ideologue and it wouldn’t make a difference, you practically don’t exist”... He basically NPC’d her haha
@nigelft4 жыл бұрын
Actually, that reminds me of this ... kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mKilapeSt6-Xl2w.html [It's worth listening in full, but pay attention from 4:05 onwards, where he talks about 'idealogical possession' and the Jungian 'people don't have ideas, but ideas have people' ...]
@lewisner4 жыл бұрын
And when he asked her why she wore makeup. She writhed like a snake. She has never been challenged like that, I bet.
@odious53174 жыл бұрын
What part was it?
@lewisner4 жыл бұрын
@@odious5317 1.08.20 in the British GQ video.
@odious53174 жыл бұрын
lewisner thanks!!
@collinsmith9941 Жыл бұрын
Jordan P. Is by far the best person to walk this earth fighting for truth, articulating what is the best way to approach life. Thank you For everything Jordan.
@kingcatnip26143 жыл бұрын
i always feel like i learned something helpful or grew in a healthy way watching these videos , thanks joe !
@TheBarrwen4 жыл бұрын
Jordan Peterson is a gentleman and an actual intellectual who has so much to offer to the world. His heart is in the right place as far as I can tell. Kudos Mr Peterson.
@ajbluesh3773 жыл бұрын
Jordan Peterson is a fraud & intellectual hack. I've been watching him for about two years now and just finished his biblical series. I realized that his entire work is ironically based off of core post modern foundations which is essentially infinite perceptions and Jordan certainly likes to make one standard line into a two hour lecture which is simply his personal projections onto the world. Truthfully anyone could do what Jordan does; just have a good imagination and deep state of creativity and you make make up an entire dimension of information from a simple thing such as " The old man thought of his youth and dead family then took a shit and then killed himself " into a 400 page book about the importance of youth and the deadly realities of regret. When not projecting his feelings, Jordan has never had an original thought in his life, everything runs back to another man: Peterson is nothing but a critic, he has created nothing of value but basic ramblings of setting your life in order, he's essentially a motivational speaker who cites philosophers with original thought to make himself seem smart. Jordan is intelligent, but he's essentially a critic with a good imagination who makes a hack intellectual. Jordan is interesting to listen to. Jordan could make anything out of anything, the content of the bible comes out of Jordan's mouth an entirely different piece of literature; he doesn't respect the work, he's telling it in his own voice and message. Jordan could do the same as he does with any piece of literature he projects his insecurities and anti-depressant & whatever disorders he's trying to circumvent with said SSRI to. Jordan is a broken man, he states that everyone is simply talking from the mouth of a dead philosopher when the truth of the matter is that all of Jordan's work is based off of dead philosophers; Jordan has created nothing to be put into a library, nothing original, nothing Jordan Peterson - he's simply another failure of Academia and another stack of papers onto a million stack of papers of ordinary men explaining their feelings upon great dead men. Jordan has a-lot of feelings and his feelings & creativity is what has given him hundreds of hours of content for his speeches and youtube account and monthly income for his patreon account. Jordan wouldn't have this career, he would be making whatever his job at his University paid him and that only if not for Post-Modernism; his work is based on an infinite number of perceptions. Yet he only argues against the physical actions of an infinite number of perceptions - not the intellectual aspect of it, because he abuses and destroys the foundation of solid work and morphs it into an entire series to explore his fantasies, his projections, his failures as a man which now spread to everyone else because he can't bare the fact that he's a hack. Peterson at the very best is a motivation speaker who cites men who've put in work into the world of actual value. He's a critic who states simple positive acts in life and turns them into cinematic events to excite delusional young men. He simply masquerades his basic, simple, copy-cat words as something fierce. Jordan has never created a work that wasn't piggy-backing on someone else. He might be the most unoriginal '' public intellectual figure '' with his influence today. His words are influential and resonates with his audience of losers & would be deviants because they're fake, made to be epic, made to be something else but simple things such as wipe your ass- You clean your room and wipe your ass because that's not being a fat piece of shit, not because you're slaying a dragon and turning the poverty-stricken NEET self of 50 years old into a millionaire. Jordan Peterson and his lobsters are immunized against all dangers: one may call them scoundrels, parasites, swindlers, profiteers, it all runs off them like water off a raincoat. But call Jordan Peterson an intellectual fraud & hack and you will be astonished at how they recoil, how injured they become, how they suddenly shrink back: “I’ve been found out.” That's what I'm going to say about it. Jordan is a fun idiot and so are his lobsters. it just shows what a ridiculous society we're in when a ridiculous mediocre hack can attract such a large cult following.
@peznee3 жыл бұрын
@@ajbluesh377 looks like someone didn’t get enough cuddles from their mummy when they were little.
@ajbluesh3773 жыл бұрын
@@peznee so, the Ad hominem fallacy (Attacking the person): This fallacy occurs when, instead of addressing someone's argument or position, you irrelevantly attack the person or some aspect of the person who is making the argument. For example, an ad hominem argument can involve simply insulting a person instead of properly replying to a point that they raised, or it can involve questioning their motives in response to their criticism of the current state of things.
@peznee3 жыл бұрын
@@ajbluesh377 I look forward to reading your published, peer reviewed articles.
@ajbluesh3773 жыл бұрын
@@peznee thanks, I'm in the middle of writing several papers. 🙄
@BlackCroLong5 жыл бұрын
Imagine a jacked Jordan Peterson. Wtf he would be unstoppable
@EzMoneyy5 жыл бұрын
TRUEEE
@club.Sceniicc5 жыл бұрын
So gay why even think this.
@EzMoneyy5 жыл бұрын
@@club.Sceniicc cuz he is already a savage, if he had muscle it would be like the perfect human being.
@64kdawg5 жыл бұрын
Apparently, when he was like in his twenties he decided to start weightlifting as he was super skinny and got himself jacked up to like 185lbs from like 140lbs or something. He said it taught him about the idea of small gains working hard diligently daily, etc. He mentioned this in some video.
@TravelsTTG5 жыл бұрын
He’s no savage
@arnoldrimmer91613 жыл бұрын
I'm ashamed to be British because of these feminists, Jordan is a legend
@thedeadnightking99753 жыл бұрын
Don’t be. Majority of these radical feminists live in the United States because the left dominates media and politics in USA.
@littlejohnnyturtle87703 жыл бұрын
Come on now matey, don't be Lily Allen, you are who you are, you just happen to live in Britain.👍👍
@psychcowboy13 жыл бұрын
Helen won.
@arnoldrimmer91613 жыл бұрын
@@psychcowboy1 🤣🤣
@psychcowboy13 жыл бұрын
@@arnoldrimmer9161 Not jordan's best performance.
@tokindawg32713 жыл бұрын
“Some ridiculous number like 4 million” lol it’s at 30 million now
@paularkins60392 жыл бұрын
Still going up 34m now :)
@glenngress6822 жыл бұрын
@@paularkins6039 40m now :D
@paularkins60392 жыл бұрын
@@glenngress682 With 35million 'I can't wait not to buy her book' comments 😂
@araplagat_2 жыл бұрын
47 million now I can't wait not to buy her book
@zakwaspe5 жыл бұрын
he basically called her a NPC
@RedemptionArtsTeam5 жыл бұрын
Very much so.
@patrickmcshane76585 жыл бұрын
What's that?
@abrahambobst46025 жыл бұрын
JP roasted her multiple times in that interview even more than Cathy Newman.
@drew38304 жыл бұрын
J he talks about meme culture a lot I would hold your lobster claw bucko
@drew38304 жыл бұрын
J of course he wouldn’t out right call her an npc he’s too measured to burn bridges by direct insults to people who he is using to widen his audience and voice.
@Micloren5 жыл бұрын
Just noticed that the only hashtag on the GQ video is "MeToo" ... good lord.
@browifgopro5 жыл бұрын
Cause jordan assaulted her verbally
@ShifuCareaga5 жыл бұрын
@@browifgopro his use of logic grabbed her by the pussy. So many machismoaggressions.... It was LITERALLY toxic and they had to call a biohazard team. The Patriarchy arrived in Gray wigs and gavels and started to assign her to ten years of dishwashing. Then they carried him off to run the banking system and play grabass with a meek secretary. Obviously she was raped.
@joemerrall6045 жыл бұрын
The comments section on jre stuff has made me the man I am today...
@ajsky10665 жыл бұрын
Wow!!! Really?? Fucking sucks. They are not even trying to hide their retardation.
@ryp0h1455 жыл бұрын
Well it automatically adds hashtags from the description to the top. And the official name if #MeToo is #MeToo, with the hashtag attached, so it makes sense
@timothyernst68133 жыл бұрын
Just watched that interview and I truly admire Jordan Peterson. Great guy and hope to help carry his mission forward ☝🏼🙌🏻👍🏼
@RGMRT2 жыл бұрын
6:47 this is what made him a great clinical psychologist and counsellor. Damn i wish i could be like him one day.
@dassyndikatify5 жыл бұрын
GQ went out of their way with the audio to LITERALLY silence Jordan Peterson.
@bluewrenreilly1294 жыл бұрын
Didn't work did it? Not for me anyway I just listened very attentively to whatever he said and boy was it worth listening to.
@edurittenhouse4 жыл бұрын
They should change GQ to FQ then, Feminist's Quarterly
@Shantanushetty334 жыл бұрын
He was out of water about 40 minutes into the interview, he held the empty glass in his hand twice, but was never offered a refill. At the 1 hour 20 minute mark the woman even held her glass full of water and put it down without even taking a sip when it was evident from Peterson's mouth movement that he was experiencing dry mouth. The lighting was such where a shadow was cast over peterson's eyes from many angles, that's something done to make a person seem less trust worthy and alter viewer perception. His mic was messed up probably on purpose to do the same. And Peterson still came out victorious.
@TheAmritabha4 жыл бұрын
Joe: the GQ interviewer was well read. Jordan during the interview : "Read More"..!!
@fiendsmoker1064 жыл бұрын
haha yeah, jordan was just simply pointing out that she was making a claim she could not back up by claiming she read things, which she used often. that is why he said read more, it attacks both the point and the backing behind it which makes her more likely to become defensive and the audience more likely to lean on your side. it was not actually an attack on her intelligence or reading portfolio.
@MarshyDitch4 жыл бұрын
fiend smoker thanks for feeling the need to break down what we all experienced upon hearing Jordan say that. Do you think you have some superior understanding as opposed to everybody else? We all picked up on that, thanks for that.
@randonologic46844 жыл бұрын
@@MarshyDitch ...I mean, I appreciated the breakdown and perspective.
@harrynac60174 жыл бұрын
@@MarshyDitch We all? You mean Seth and Doan?
@samanthaperla97094 жыл бұрын
Hahhahahhahahahaha True
@katsealy57393 жыл бұрын
I love Jordan Peterson! We need more people like him! Thank you this interview! What a fascinating gentleman.
@MLD.Ltd.3 жыл бұрын
That interview (1:42:14 long) posted by British GQ channel from two years ago is recommended to me by KZfaq for Up Next, it currently has 32 million views.
@tc22413 жыл бұрын
I guess it’s because I’m a man, but I never saw Jordan’s statements as anti-feminists or pushing against changes. Just a guy analyzing peoples and mental make up
@christineawuor18353 жыл бұрын
Well he says things like: 1) Women are high in negative emotion. 2) Women are more agreeable 3) Women are unhappy in their choices to have a career. I think he comes off as someone advocating traditional way of life, which is great for men but has proven to be a lose for women.. (as a feminist I know his message is a bit nuance) but his audience are men who are listening to those generalization about women which even Jordan himself admit it is only applicable to percentage of women..
@christineawuor18353 жыл бұрын
4) Women do stupid courses.. all of these are quite insulting to the feminine which just makes women more protective and territorial hence become even more feminist
@JohnSmith-mu8zo3 жыл бұрын
Christine Awuor I mean I’d say he just presents it in a very unemotional and factual way so that means that if he’s saying something negative or something people don’t like then they grow colder. Also when he does say things like you listed he puts words like ‘most’ in front of would say percentages, he doesn’t make such blanket generalisations
@tc22413 жыл бұрын
Christine Awuor interesting, I’ve not heard these types of broad statements or at least generalized in that manner. I’ve heard him say his personal, traditional, view points (which I mostly don’t agree with), but I’ve only heard him make statements such as “ percentage of X generally seems to Y” when describing anything that may be perceived as factual. I’ve never taken such remarks as direct correlation because it’s not absolute, it’s his stated opinion. If you have them, I wouldn’t mind links to some of these more declarative statements. If he’s made them, then I can understand the animosity.
@destroyermaker3 жыл бұрын
Nah plenty of women like him. it's not about gender it's about whether you're an unreasonable moron or not.
@omarojjeh55894 жыл бұрын
If I had money I'd come all the way from Syria to watch and listen to this genius of a man
@michaeltadrous92343 жыл бұрын
I like how Joe can just create an MMA analogy of every situation.
@isaiahwelch80662 жыл бұрын
The most important thing I came away with in that British GQ interview? That Marxism, as an ideology, continuously fights against human nature by trying to advocate for no hierarchies in society -- and then, when it attains power, the first thing it does is institute hiearchies. Marxism, in that context, is more self-contradictory than even moral relativism.
@psychcowboy12 жыл бұрын
Plenty of them are saying there should be no such thing as hiererarchies... Jordan Peterson. Plenty? Find me one.
@isaiahwelch80662 жыл бұрын
@@psychcowboy1 : You aren't understanding what Petersen is saying, if you think that Petersen is saying hierarchies shouldn't exist. Petersen acknowledges that hierarchies will always exist in nature, whether the Neo-Progressivists or Marxists want them to or not. Petersen's argument has been that in human society today, hierarchies should be based on merit, and that merit should be based on competence. The Neo-Progressives and Marxists want no hierarchies -- such as Marx and Engels both arguing for the proletariat to own the means of production, instead of a capitalist. The very notion of one person, the capitalist, owning the means of production, to them, means that there is no group decision, no "groupthink," and a hierarchy is the default, de facto relationship structure. The issue is that Neo-Progressives, a half-century ago, again tried to cloak Marxism using already-existing words, but giving them different definitions -- and then when they were found out, they would move the goalposts and redefine the word or phrase again. Why do you think the socialists, communists, Neo-Progressives, and Marxists of today say, "Oh, we know socialism failed before, but we want to try it in America, because it hasn't been done right." This is bullshite at its finest, being nothing more than a philosophical version of snake oil. Made to make you feel good, but is actually harmful for you -- which is what Petersen means when he says that, given the results of "The Great Equity Experiment" being over 100 million dead over the last century, and countless millions more enslaved, imprisoned, starved, and worked to death, that such results are incompatible with a message of having compassion for the downtrodden. And the reason being is the other core tenet of Neo-Progressivism, which is that history and human nature both have an infinite amount of interpretations. While technically true, the issue is believing that leads to two things: 1) Muddying the water, with regards to how to solve problems, especially social problems, and 2) Hesitancy, which leads to talk, talk, and more talk, where nothing ever actually gets done, because at least theoretically, there is never any kind of moral or ethical consensus. Further, whenever anything ever is implemented, the people for any such policy never consider the unintended consequences of what they do. This is why programs in the US, like the "Great Society" social programs under Johnson, failed to produce promised results -- and in many ways, made things worse for everybody.
@psychcowboy12 жыл бұрын
@@isaiahwelch8066 I repeat. Find me one. I quoted Peterson and you say I don't understand what he is saying? Weird. Any living person in any position of authority who says there should be no such thing as hierarchies. JP says there are plenty. Find me one. A name and a quote. You mentioned solving social problems. Has JP ever offered a solution to any social problem?
@isaiahwelch80662 жыл бұрын
@@psychcowboy1 : First, it's not "weird" when you have stated the opposite of the position JP holds. He has never said there shouldn't be hierarchies -- he says the opposite. But he clarifies that position by stating that hierarchies should be based on merit and competence -- which I stated in my first reply to you. In everything I've ever seen Petersen say, or heard him say, he has never once stated that there should be no hierarchies -- yet you say you quoted Petersen. _That_ is the weird thing, IMO. As for you wanting anyone in a position of authority, first, what kind of authority are you talking about? If you're talking about political authority, to say what you've claimed would antithetical and oxymoronic, as no political authority I've ever heard has ever said there should be no hierarchy. If you're talking about a philosophical authority, I mentioned Marx and Engels, who would be the authorities on Marxism -- they created it, after all, and they did speak of abolishing hierarchies, with the idea of the proletariat owning the means of production. This is, itself, stating that pure equality should be the order of the day, which is intrinsically impossible, given that people, as a general truth, are inherently inequal. Even Plato, another philosophical authority, conceded this point in _The Republic,_ when he laid out his idea of utopia, in which he saw that people would do things and occupations according to their strengths and talents. But to address your point fully, I would say that the idea of a person in a position of authority, who is still living, who says that there should be no hierarchies is contradictory at best. That idea makes no logical sense, as people in positions of authority, as history shows, while in authority, tends to consolidate the hierarchy in what ways they can, limited by, usually, things like laws. But again, this is more political authority. The only place I can think of where Petersen could have been speaking of are colleges and universities, where professors of tenure, being in a position of authority, are at the same time pushing for Marxism and collectivism. I say this because Petersen, to address your other question, has stated a few solutions to the problems of society: 1) Bring back fathers into the homes, allowing them to raise children again. This is, according to many people, one of, if not _the_ biggest problem in American society. 2) Relegate, if not eliminate, teaching Marxism in college, which has led to an American society that, by and large, no longer is a society that wants freedoms and liberties for everyone. Now, there are elements of society that would rather have a soft tyranny, followed by a hard tyranny -- and those elements have risen to prominence because of the proliferation of Marxism in colleges and universities, which has made today's "humanities" into something antithetical to what it meant only 20 or 30 years ago. For example, this idea of speech censorship on college campuses, which includes the idea of denying a paid speaker the opportunity to go and give his or her presentation. Things like this are the result of letting people in positions of authority push a narrative such as Marxism, and as a result, made societies around the world less free. As to your question, I don't recall anyone by name that Petersen has mentioned, only that, at the time they re-branded Marxism, they were who he referred to as the "Neo-Progressives from the 1960s." Who, by the way, were some of the first ones to state anything about tearing down the absurdity they call "the Patriarchy," which is what led to the first wave of feminism in the 1970s. And if that's not a call to eliminate hierarchies, "tearing down the Patriarchy," I don't know what is.
@psychcowboy12 жыл бұрын
@@isaiahwelch8066 Me...quotes Peterson. You... It's weird you say you quote Peterson. Why is it weird for me to say I quoted Peterson? I did quote him. Peterson at 44:00 'Plenty of them are arguing that there should be no such thing as hierarchies.' Helen: I see that as almost never in the world as an argument. Jordan: What do you think the demand for equality of outcome is? And you don't think the neo-marxists and post modernists think that hierarchies are a social construction? Helen: I don't think that is a very widely held view. Jordan: 20% of social scientists identify as Marxist. Look it up in Haidt's work, I have checked it out quite carefully, it is a perfectly valid statistic. [JP is so totally full of crap. Note how he often refers to these mysterious and unspecified evil post modern neo marxist social constructionists, who want equality of outcome and no hierarchies? Why does he never once identify who he is talking about? Because outside of fictitious bogeymen in the dust balls under JP's bed they do not exist. In the paper JP is referring to 'Prevalence of Marxism in Academia', they conclude that Marxism in universities is 'A tiny minority view, 3%'. So Helen was right. You studied it quite carefully? Whoops Jordan. JP refers Helen to Jonathan Haidt's work to find the study. Whoops again Jordan, you studied it quite carefully and then falsely attributed the author as Haidt?]
@mr.Swartz5 жыл бұрын
Jordan Peterson is what Brain Callen thinks he sounds like
@Leit22905 жыл бұрын
J Swartz interesting
@efrengramajo5 жыл бұрын
Hahahha
@sociallysavage11265 жыл бұрын
Lmfaoooooooo
@Max-zr7hr5 жыл бұрын
Hahah so true
@joegoes19605 жыл бұрын
Perfectly said
@urbanfu5 жыл бұрын
Feminists don't realise that Peterson is the best thing ever to help Women get a better partner and a family.
@Bonez0r5 жыл бұрын
I'm surprised there are no replies yet from triggered SJW feminists. "So what you're saying is, all a woman should strive for is finding a husband and having a family?"
@urbanfu5 жыл бұрын
Bonez0r I guess they're busy posting selfies on Instagram for validation.
@michelleamatulle63785 жыл бұрын
Bonez0r we’re tired.
@veritasabsoluta42855 жыл бұрын
@@urbanfu lmaooo so true
@TheMilwaukeeProtocol4 жыл бұрын
I don't feel invalidated by Peterson. I am that 40% he talks about.
@jayrichjlr3 жыл бұрын
I absolutely loved his gq interview. He owned it.
@brianmi403 жыл бұрын
JP: GQ Interview: "No one talked about identity politics 20 or 30 years ago, it's a new term." 34:48 "The term was coined by the Combahee River Collective in 1977.[4]" "It took on widespread usage in the early 1980s..." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_politics
@Abdullah-wi1iy2 жыл бұрын
so jordan was right it seems thanks for the fact
@mps5033 жыл бұрын
Love this interview. I’m a property manager and - as such - I’m subjected to many online reviews. Largely, people aim to dehumanize. It’s tough to stomach.
@ElectriconicJesus5 жыл бұрын
Joe "Joe Rogan" Rogan.
@namelesscapone47865 жыл бұрын
Joe "Joe "joe rogan" Rogan" Rogan
@kurtkish69705 жыл бұрын
Lex IV Awesome “this thing” thing.
@MichaelMarucci5 жыл бұрын
Roe "Oej Jogan" Goraj
@davidpfeifer94895 жыл бұрын
Lex IV haha
@uncleterry17035 жыл бұрын
Joe "Rogan Joe" Rogan
@willberham5 жыл бұрын
Joe "let me tell you about weed and jujitsu" Rogan
@L1b3rta5 жыл бұрын
jewjitsu
@jdp67644 жыл бұрын
Gotta have goooood tweed dude
@tomlawrence39914 жыл бұрын
DMT and jujutsu
@toku583 жыл бұрын
I've never heard of this person before this. But He is now one of my Hero's!!
@SkintDaGoat2 жыл бұрын
For people to pay in time and money to travel from Australia to England is a testament to how much Jordan is greatly respected,
@houssambouhou78463 жыл бұрын
For an ignorant , or let's say for an "ideologically posessed" person , I think the most dangerous thing about having a conversation with Jordan Peterson is that the guy knows you better than you do , and what's more dangerous is he understands very well your philosophy while you don't understand his , and that's why I love him because he always have a strong idea about something or someone
@theancientsam2 жыл бұрын
Bro I was just thinking about this. It was so good!
@jhova1875 жыл бұрын
Joe “I read an article” Rogan
@itb18205 жыл бұрын
jhova187 misplaced quotation. Fail
@jhova1875 жыл бұрын
E90 335i lol
@modernsavage25845 жыл бұрын
Joe does read alot even before he was famous.
@mikhailasanovic5 жыл бұрын
jhova187 how else are you supposed to learn stuff?
@loopy70575 жыл бұрын
Or Joe "I have a friend" Rogan.
@blunt0matic3 жыл бұрын
There was a couple moments where she thought she had him , the best was the rapid fire questions, she asks his favorite author then favorite female author and she didnt even know the female author he mentioned
@ronjon52413 жыл бұрын
Cudos to you Joe Rogan.... for landing the interview with true gentleman. And to Jordan for accepting it. Well done and thank you both. Sorry I’m so late on the comment... I’m blaming You Tube notification as I know the minute I saw you two paired up I would have dropped everything to tune in. :-)
@omgzfuup3 жыл бұрын
Her distaste was palpable throughout the interview.
@heatherpoulson54073 жыл бұрын
@ omgzfuup - I agree! Well said. Even though she was trying to be civil, she still exuded hostility. A "prove it" attitude.
@Reblwitoutacause3 жыл бұрын
She was a shining example of Dunning-Kruger Effect. An aggressive one at that.
@TorahObservantUnitarian3 жыл бұрын
Good word. Palpable thanks.
@Takobella3 жыл бұрын
Sadly yes. I'm a feminist and don't agree with Peterson on all his views, although I think he nails it in some areas. But you can disagree with someone and have a civil debate with them. She was dissapointing
@andyostertag3 жыл бұрын
In the beginning..not the closing wrap up questions. It's my thought she took in much during the time spent
@zebboykin5 жыл бұрын
JBPs beard is on point. The old wise man
@hitman91985 жыл бұрын
@@AmetReloads triggered much
@jamestodd11045 жыл бұрын
AmetReloads lol fool
@DefeatLust5 жыл бұрын
Movember
@socaljusticewarrior5585 жыл бұрын
@@AmetReloads Yass. Slay. There is too much of his pansy ass these days. He's trying to become some kind of a Messiah.
@juansilva17075 жыл бұрын
No body cares about his self help shit, whaat people like me have a problem with is that he is a typical right wing Christian conservative who is anti climate change. Also not to mention he does interviews with people like Lauren Southern and famous anti sjws, but can't talk to people like Kyle Kulinski, Sam Seder, Hasan Piker, David Pakman, etc. And then he bitches when people say hes an alt righter......
@ultra71532 жыл бұрын
3:17 Lewis brutally lost that war since she was checked at every single premise she attempted to put forward. For someone drunk on her intellect and education, she came out as a fool and unlikely sees it that way.
@danthelambboy3 жыл бұрын
This is a great interview about an interview about an interview