Heeeeeeeelp!

"Give her enough rope ..."

😂 😂

Haha you could tell she was like “ i done gone fucked up now..” 😂

She had 3 whole pages guys it could take weeks to go through them all.

this hack wine metaphor continues to age like a used diaper in the hot sun.

No? This aged so poorly. You do not want a random sample size for the opinion of a population on these issues. The whole point of listing the opinions of the various institutions was for a biased sample. You want expert opinion on the issue just like you would value expertise on how to construct a publicly funded bridge project. Those who are not contending with the data should not have had a significant sway on the legislation of c16.

@@wasnt_it Where does it say _wine?_

@James Montgomery Freedom without limit exposes itself to the very forces that can facilitate its destruction. Perhaps an amendment that attributes any discussion of the inhibition of free speech as a direct call to violence; that wouldn’t go a miss.

@@puffballavada6967 compelled speech is different from a bridge project.

0mnis14sh I actually enjoyed it haha

She clearly didn't know Peterson's position.

I was caught off guard by how quickly she exposed herself as unprepared, uninformed and frankly, foolish, despite presenting the calm demeanor of a well-researched inquisitor that has a compendious grasp of the issue at hand. I sensed Peterson was agitated by the level of mental capacity he was obliged to address. That being said, as much of an idiot as Omidvar may be, NONE of her colleagues assisted and watched the bus roll over her and back up...awful.

I didn't feel bad her her.Sucked in bitch.That's what i thought.

The chair could see she was trying to get out of a hole she dug for herself and he wasn't about to hand her a ladder, lol.

honestly its a very good example of authoritarian appeal fallacy which alot of people on the internet seem to conflate with citing sources or providing reference material. I think that "Authoritarian appeal" becomes a fallacy the instant there is no merit or mechanism behind it. Which she hilariously got caught in the middle of it when she couldnt bring forth any valid points against peterson.

She got owned like I have never seen anyone get owned before!

@@Rockabillyrulzok Not only that, but the points he made to discredit her were shockingly simple to understand!

@@brumafriend It doesn't matter. Simply having the law on the books sets a dangerous precedent.

@@brumafriend I don't know the answer, but like I said, it doesn't matter. Just the fact that someone COULD be arrested is unacceptable.

How do arrive at that? She “tries to weasel”? Furthermore from the beginning of this video to the end… I’m still waiting to see what Peterson has with regards to evidence that supports what he is saying.

😂 She missed the whole point.

It's truly incredible. I strive for that level of eloquence.

*hello fellow lobsters, how do you do*

@@inachang5394 *clank clank*

*snip snip*

August Hi feeling *crabby*

He’s very verbose but that does not really go to prove any statements that he makes. It just means that he knows how to use complex academic jargon in such a way to make it seem that what he is talking about is relevant. This is also indicative of a man that argues in bad faith. He speaks confidently but presents no evidence for his statements. He is nebulous and evasive when he makes his statements as well, this is a rhetorical trick that he employs in order to avoid actually presenting an evidence-based argument. So no it’s not “jaw droppings amazing.” He’s simply a political crank.

Well put!

She is a cultists, thus she thought she is prepared.

I thought she performed very well, at filling up the required 3 minutes specifying what the word "many" means, for all of us together--as well as any of us in the singular--who might not be totally sure about just that, whilst the chair figured out who they were going to call on to stall for them, next.

She is mature enough to know it. She is not intelligent enough to put together cogent questions. 90% of her question was self congratulating on her adherence to a group ideology and superiority to a perceived enemy, not spending a moments thought onto what that perceived enemy was trying to accomplish. She is an embarrassment to humanity. An embarrassment to Canadians and an embarrassment to adults. Does she even still have a job? She's barely qualified to be a stamp licker.

but the bill passed.

@@benjamink.1970 indicating a larger scope of the spread of wanton stupidity. Sadly, this cancer that has infected Canada will only be removed through revolution. That revolution will only be able to effectively happen peacefully if the government of Canada totally collapses. As a Canadian, I believe Canada will enact its own self-destruction within the next 20-30 years, maybe sooner, but I don't know. I'd rather not be there when it happens. If it happens later, I'd really, *REALLY* prefer not to be there when it happens because when socialism gets to that stage, that's when millions of people starve. Canada has been ruined by the far leftists. It must be from their own hand that its collapse also happens. Fortunately, history doesn't always repeat itself, but it does tend to rhyme, so we probably don't have to wait too long. Perhaps within this generation, perhaps within the next. Slipping into socialism/communism can not continue indefinitely. Trudeau is now under investigation for yet another corruption scandal of dropping 900 million of government funds into his wife's pockets (well, sort of indirectly), so we'll see if that wakes up the Canadian populace. I doubt it. Unfortunately, the type of leader Canada needs right now is not represented by any other politicians in the field. Canada has no political leaders who have clarity of mind. If there were, they wouldn't be anywhere near popular enough to get any headway. Canada is openly hostile to the types of ideas that they need in order to survive the next 50-100 years. That's a bad mix there Canada.

But I’m sorry… Where does Peterson actually present evidence for what he says? He attacks her but presents no evidence of his own. Isn’t the onus on him to actually prove that his statement has evidence to support it? He came out attacking Bill C16 and presented no evidence that supported his alarmist rhetoric. I would go one further to say that he lied or he didn’t read it. Either way? He never presents anything that supports what he says about this bill. Ever.

💯💯 Thanks for mentioning.

So Gandhi then was no postmodernist.

Wrestle-mania style super-slam to canvas !

Lmao whoever posted this should add the sound effect of a body bag getting zippered up right after Peterson ends with "so..."

Bill passed and she keeps her popularity vote. I guess she won at the end

@Jigov i dont get it, JP is so smart, yet his internet comment section followers have an average iq of 85 and remember only 5 years of history, how come?

Same thing with Einstein, Socrates, and other great minds. It just happens

Sadly, the people in the room who were dumb enough to listen to her probably found that to be a pretty convincing argument. This bill passed. So the people responsible likely have barely enough IQ between the lot of them to carry on competitively in a debate against cauliflower. Not against eating cauliflower... against an actual head of cauliflower. An absolute disgrace.

@@CrzyLion can you please be more specific? His internet comment section followers have an IQ of 85 and only remember 5 years of history. Where did you find this group of people? How did you assess their IQ as 85? How did you arrive at the conclusion that they can only remember 5 years of history? Ironically, this is your response against someone who feels that communists are steeped in demagogy. Are you perchance a communist? Are you trying to prove him right?

@@eschelar do u think calling people stupid is demagogy? same way jp fans seem to think theres communists hiding in trashcans despite communism being dead and buried in the west. its dumb as fuck and these comments are the reason people look down on jp "oh look at his fans, frustrated young little male virgins, jp must be alt right"

SHE HAS FILES AND FILES OF BUMPER STICKERS.....HOW DARE YOU

@@buildinit6523 i cant stop laughing lolol

She doesn’t understand the human mind enough for even those Lmao. Probably has to have her party deal with it for her.

I'm sure she understands that. She just doesn't give a damn, her mission was to push that agenda knowing all too well that its not a good thing. Which makes it worse. I'd rather be an idiot who doesn't know any better than a horrible human being.

Probably why she became a politician

And his move is then: (angry voice) I am so good and you don't understand me, ramble ramble ramble. 👌

Like Global Warming.

@@naomiharbour7841 Omidvar's move is an argument from authority. Peterson's move is 1. This is how statistical sampling really works. 2. I agree with the statement you read. 3. Your law compelling speech doesn't address the problem. Your move, Naomi, is ad hominem, and inaccurate ad hominem at that.

But the irony is that it's not his "opinion", he's just stating the facts.

Yeah, but the salient purpose-duty demands actual work. When you are a diversity hire, work is hard. So you start talking about social justice, quotas, gender discrimination blah blah blah...and at the end of the day you destroyed instead of building something.

Defending human rights isn't protecting it's citizens? What universe is that in?

@@E.J.Crunkleton Well, in your universe "human rights" likely mean anything some bureaucrat stipulates them to mean.

@@johnchambers2996 you're wrong, but I doubt I can convince you otherwise.

9999

LOL people still play DnD?

Yeah, but only the cool kids. Like our IT department.

Andrew Haack *DM says "your attack hits the AC Unfortunately the SJW Tarrasque is immune to logic attacks!*

only recently got into d&d but so far i'm amazed by it. it's an interactive unifying fiction for the human race, i'm almost certain.

The Canadian Senate is not elected. My regrets to anyone who gets confused about this. It's a house of individuals appointed for life at the recommendation of the prime minister. So senators appointed under previous prime ministers (including, obviously, prime ministers belonging to other parties than the current governing party) stay in the Senate.

Ilya Ibrahimovic what a terrible idea.

@@mjtechnoviking44 Have a suggestion for how to get it changed? The system has been in place...since before Confederation, if my history is correct. I don't even know what the mechanism would be to change this aspect of the system, or if there even is a formal process for that.

Ilya Ibrahimovic well an election with term limits wouldn’t be a bad thing. Seems to me like having one guy appoint all these people would mean he wouldn’t appoint anyone who would oppose him.

@@mjtechnoviking44 That's not what I meant. People have talked about alternative setups for a long time. There's a reason none of them materialized, and it has to do with the structure of a democracy being difficult to change - by design. Regardless of what system we might want to change to, the issue is getting it implemented.

You agree with him years later even after he was shown to be 100% wrong about "compelled speech" and fabricated problems with the bill that didn't exist. Amazin.

@@E.J.Crunkleton Firstly, there are two genders - male and female. There are two pronouns used to describe these genders - he and she. Anything else is made-up nonsense. So C-16 was attempting to penalize people for not buying into the Marxist narrative the LGB community is pushing.

@@jamesgray7064 those are sexes.not genders. You're welcome.

@@jamesgray7064 it actually doesn't penalize anyone, it's a civil protection for trans individuals against bigotry from people like you who think you can define them out of existence by claiming they don't exist. Unfortunately for you, we can see that they do.

@@E.J.Crunkleton JP and his lawyer demonstrated a time line of likely events that would mean imprisonment for not using a 'preferred' pronoun.. That means its not 'preferred' but rather compelled. You are wrong and are one of the reasons the world is drowning in chaos. Be better

Blue Angel exactly,

PETERSONNIHILATION!!!

@@eschelar ....we'll put that on the shortlist 😊

"he/she/it/xyz pronoun was sent over the Jordan!"

@Friday’s are cool I don't think they would need to. Both Jordan and Chris were able to handle their shit and get along with people with whom they had some disagreements. It's only the mentally weak who cannot. I believe they would find a great deal of mutual respect.

Sex

Cause decently thinking people don't want to deal with clueless corrupt people with nothing but agenda that currently occupy higher position, would go mad.

We smart people go into business, leaving the power of politics to the bottom tier business people and most corrupt people

I have finally come to the conclusion that clueless are put into office by even more clueless people and all of them far outnumber the rest of us!!!

people vote them in.

He was on his daughter's podcast last week.

lol

Ideally, don't you WANT the people in the position of authority to BE asking the experts on the subject?

Nyet Zdyec you would if those people acted on what they were told by the experts, but that’s not what is happening, and that’s not what happened with the bill in this video.

@@andrewsperry6450 Yeah, I know. They passed the bill anyway, without listening to the warning of the precedent that they'd be setting. Way too many emotions, and way too little logic.