Jordan Peterson - The hard problem of consciousness is not hard enough
Рет қаралды 4,298
6 жыл бұрынHe talks about the famous philosophical quandary introduced by the philosopher David Chalmers.
Original source: • 2015 Maps of Meaning 0...
FAIR USE NOTICE: This Video may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes.
I curate content (edit little snippets of wisdom from the original material) and by giving it an original take and a coherent narrative, it adds value to the original content, plus makes it know to new people.
@Sich97 3 жыл бұрын
What a great start of a video
@krisc6216 5 жыл бұрын
“All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter.” ― Max Planck
@sk8nbarrow591 5 жыл бұрын
Where is the rest of this talk to be found?
@sk8nbarrow591 5 жыл бұрын
Pragmatic, this isn't the same talk as this excerpt^.
@jhunt5578 5 жыл бұрын
We are deterministic, we do not have free will. We can choose to do whatever we want... but we cannot choose what it is we want.
@deoliveiradamien7192 4 жыл бұрын
I must disagree. We simply need good reasons to go against what it is we want, and to influence it so it can go away. And to get good reasons, you need reasoning, and the will to understand what surrounds you. Thank God, this "will" is natural, and the only desire we do not get to choose at all.
@lifewasgiventous1614 4 жыл бұрын
De Oliveira Damien That actually makes a lot of sense.
@quantumofspace1367 3 жыл бұрын
At the heart of the informational formation and development of matter: perhaps controlled by a program - from fractals with samples of standing waves from quantum membranes and coding. (+ --) =1, (+ - - + или - + + -)=0 и (-- +)=1 We get a module from the quantum "rosebud" (director with a script for generating specific quantum fields). Where the free volume of quantum membranes becomes the carrier and repository of information for living organisms in the brain and seeds, consisting of many - quantum "rosebuds". This gives us an idea that some information about the structure of the Universe is initially introduced into all brains and seeds, and the other part of information, through feelings and exchanges with virtual (cosmos, universe) particles entering the brain, is processed and stored by information.
@ZennyReacts 5 жыл бұрын
Westworld. Would love to hear Jordan's take on it
@TheProdigalMeowMeowMeowReturns 5 жыл бұрын
The "robots" are *clearly* conscious from the start of the show, protestations to the contrary notwithstanding. They think in the sense of internal reflections to figure out what's going on, they plan, they have intentions, they have desires, and they experience/ feel fear and joy. They. Are. Conscious. The show is great, but the constant rambling about how the robots "are not really conscious" is ridiculous.
@danielcappell 4 жыл бұрын
"we could be totally deterministic zombies" -- petersons locution here betrays that he doesn't grasp the issue. Chalmers is not at all talking about determinism or free will. perhaps peterson is thinking of *voodoo* zombies?
@UnratedAwesomeness 5 жыл бұрын
“Why is there anything at all and what is there that is” This man needs to speak to a Thomist
@wolflarsen1900 5 жыл бұрын
what he needs is to talk with a language philosopher. Nearly everything he says is nonesense, it is not even wrong because for a sentence to be wrong it has to be known what it means if it would be right. (ok the second one after the konjunctor is a tautology and only useless not senseless^^) Statements and questions like that are senseless. Its the same as to ask what was before the big bang. The entire hard question of consciousness is a conceptual confusion. Every scientific and philosophical question starts with the question what does it mean what i am asking. oh god, there isn´t anything without consciousness? aha what does consciousness than mean, being?
@manubishe 5 жыл бұрын
First?
@XtheEntX 5 жыл бұрын
Say it with more confidence
@robopoet 5 жыл бұрын
Nope. It was me.
@TheProdigalMeowMeowMeowReturns 5 жыл бұрын
STOP THAT. Why should anyone care about being "first"? Especially when the first thing they say is, "first"? That's a *terrible* way to make your debut.
@TheProdigalMeowMeowMeowReturns 5 жыл бұрын
You can be the first one on deeszNUTS
@axlkochubey2701 5 жыл бұрын
awful voice
Vedanta Society of New York
Рет қаралды 40 М.
Simon Mundie
Рет қаралды 5 М.
The Institute of Art and Ideas
Рет қаралды 151 М.