Taking the corners out of the run game? Comical to act like you understand football then say something that dumb, the idea is that their splits and formations force a defense to play with a formation that has 5 or 6 dbs, instead of 3 or 4 linebackers, and then when they run the ball successfully it makes it hard to stop.

Thanks Shane. Make sure to share it if you can.

They cheated with cheat codes! Explain why Cooper Mays never had a match up????? Btw how is Hendon Hookers injury????

100% correct I would say. Georgia did a really good job of confusing him pre snap in the 3rd qtr. The one knock I do have of the offense or maybe it was just Hooker himself, was the absence of a drop. As a Georgia fan myself, he made himself a much easier target with that one step drop. And I just wondered why he didn't really drop back 3 to 5 steps after the 1st half pressure from the d‐line of the Dawgs. I would say that even helped South Carolina get closer to him in that 2nd half. If a team isn't afraid to bring 5 or 6 after the Tennessee quarterback they'll have that qb spinning before the end of the game.

@@TheJasonJackson84 I think a lot of that is scheme. They play action on most plays and incorporate the QB run so they don't like giving ground. No drop also simplifies things for the OTs. UGA just out-talented UT. The scheme couldn't overcome it. That should become more competitive as UT closes the talent gap. It is important to remember that UT was still playing with a short roster made up mostly of Pruitt's holdovers last fall. Heupel's recruiting looks better so far and is recruited more to his scheme. He hasn't gotten what the analysts thought were "elite" portal guys... but they've all produced. UT's D couldn't stop USCe. UT had run out of players. I don't believe there was a healthy CB available that night. J Banks was out. Still, the O produced 38 points and over 500 yds of O. If you produce those numbers... your D has to hold up its end.

@@scotttuttle3513 in some agreement. I'm not getting onto the Vols defense. Just in regards to their offense, the weak point is the short or totally absent dropback. To be successful at times you have to ditch certain aspects of the game plan or scheme, especially something as simple as a dropback. We saw CJ Stroud use his legs against Northwestern and Georgia, which was not what Ohio State plans to do with their quarterbacks but it saved the day for them in Evanston and nearly won the game in Atlanta. Georgia really picked up on something because late in the 3rd and through the early 4th it was the defensive scheme that ate Tennessee up the most, more than just being a talent gap. Hooker wasn't picking up on blitzes coming or where they were coming from. And the coverage that Georgia used that Alabama didn't, made a big difference too. Because I don't think Tennessee's win was due to Alabama being equally or less talented. As you stated they outschemed Alabama. Georgia defensively schemed better than Tennessee to help that talent. That's just playing with fire to me if it's part of a hardline scheme. Saban will likely pick up on it and be blitz heavy in this year's game. But yeah they should be able to maintain their level of success from last year.

@@TheJasonJackson84 Others tried. It wasn't a secret. Like the guy in the video said, UGA just had the talent to whip UT's OL which made Hooker's reads "wrong" when they should have been right. He rightly read "run" but UGA's 5 or 6 were enough to limit them. That left him with no choice but to throw into a secondary that was covering over the top. As for ditching elements, Hooker's legs breaking the pocket often made a huge difference. In just one year, they improved the ability to control tempo rather than just always running fast. But if you take the "crap" Heupel inherited and score over 30 in 9 of 13 games in year one then 12 of 13 in year two... and are building up the talent level... you should probably be careful about how much you change. UGA was a uniquely talented team. Elite talent across the board on D. That's not true of UT on either side of the ball yet. The future is going to be fun if Heupel keeps getting the kinds of players he's getting and Smart sustains what he's getting on D.

How do I stop it