JESSE WILSON yup, I’m right/conservative but believe in climate change, it’s scientifically proven

JESSE WILSON Too bad Big Oil Business corrupted one side of politics to be ‘skeptics’ of the science of anthropogenic climate change (in reality they are usually just denying).

Its weird how it became that way.

The far right and far left cannot budge in their beliefs. So annoying. I’m right, but if something is proven or makes sense, I tend to believe it.

Its so fucking weird that its a right and left issue

She formed a very strong opinion after one night of 'deep diving' into a couple of articles. I'm not from the US and a touch confused...is she actually considered as bright over there?

@@madhatter4173 I'm not from the us either, but I think a lot of Americans would not consider her bright. But a lot probably would, which is a tad frightening

🤣🙌🏼😂😂

Tis fucking hilarious comment man 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Science never proved anything. If you believe science leads to objective truths you're a sheep

Another good question, a you sure your opinion is made on correct information?

She did fucking say she didn’t know enough nd Joe kept pushing

That's because she continues to express strong opinions on this topic about which she is ignorant. @@Yodontdoit

Yes, it is correct to say that one cannot discuss a topic without relevant data. I don't believe you can find an example of someone expressing a meaningful opinion on a topic about which they possess no information. @@deusmuerte6832

@@OneTheBlue well Joe has since changed his stance on climate change to something similar to hers sooo

no, you didn’t!

Emphasis on the speed. They're legal meth heads. Probably hopped up on adderall or something. They sound like every meth head or coke head who's ever thought that what they have to say means something.

@John Burton I kno that you kno that I kno that IF that wasnt sarcasm that was about as racist as you can get while simultaneously being as ignant as you can get...n you kno I kno you kno you ain't no racist...so ima chalk that up as sarcasm.

@John Burton "credit to her race" sounds pretttty fuckin' racist bro, lol.

@John Burton there's only one race, you twat...human. And saying "credit to their race", is like saying "they speak well for a _______". It's at best a backhanded compliment, but in reality, just racism.

@@KnockManJo speaking super fast and saying absolutely nothing of substance isn't verbal dexterity.

Joe's a moron

Every time her mouth opens

Jessica W lol

She believes science is not real, I believe she is shit!!!

@Very Fake News CNN Are you stupid. Scientists around the globe are saying so and warn us. Look up the greenhouse effect and look up a graph There you go

Too true

She is the absolute expert in ignoring arguments and facts. Nobody does it better

Well joe asked the same question for 20 minutes and she had the same answer for 20 minutes. If anyones intelligence should be questioned that day it’s Joe for not accepting the answer to his question 🤦🏾‍♂️ Joe turned it into an interrogation 😂

@@daret7368well when you are incapable of articulating a sound argument and your only response is basically “it’s not real bcuz I say so” then you’d have to expect Joe to continue prying. It would make Joe seem disingenuous to allow her to spew a bunch of bullshit and not challenge her on it. It’s simple, Candace. Answer the fucking question like a grown up and then maybe he wouldn’t have to keep asking it 🤷‍♂️

Yeah filler words are a big deal. I like to stay quiet around these people and listen. “Like, uh, literally, ummm..” my kid knows ummm is the sound in dumb. For a reason. Memorizing talking points and regurgitating them as fast as possible doesn’t make you smart, it makes you a parrot. That’s Candace.

It's called "backpedaling", as in when you pedal a vehicle backwards instead of forwards.

@@hoon_sol thanks, you can rest easily now that I fixed that typo on a 2 month old comment.

@@PPSainity: There's a big difference between a typo and a misspelling; in the former case you know how to spell it but made some error while writing it (like missing a character or hitting a different character, or maybe an extra space, and so on), whereas in the latter case you think a word is spelled in a different way than it really is. So me correcting you on it should ideally be welcomed by you, since you have now learnt how to spell it correctly. But thanks, I'll sleep quite peacefully tonight indeed.

@@hoon_sol whatever gotta tell yourself my dude.

@@PPSainity: I'm just stating the facts. Saying "backpeddling" is an extremely common misspelling of "backpedaling", and not something you accidentally type when trying to spell "backpedaling" instead. That's the big difference between the two. Now show some gratitude for the correction, so that you don't embarrass yourself to others in the future by making that misspelling.

😂😂😂

Under rated comment.

LMFAO

Nah. This is logic arguing with ideological bullshit.

😂

Cuz it hurts so good.

I don't know, I feel a little better about myself.

Because its a woman

Because attempting to understand others means more to you than holding your opinions higher than others.

All of these comment replies are massive copes. Dont let them tell you this video isn't pure pain that hasn't brought out anything good to think or feel about yourself or anyone or anything

She never had a even a finest second.

who cares?

@@user-cg5lo4zy6f apparently you do since you took the time to not only read my comment but also to reply to it 🤡

​@@user-cg5lo4zy6fMe. I care.

A lot of people

It's not about disagreeing at this point. Is someone who's flat out completely wrong

No just Candace

People

She's wrong about Global Warming... but her point is she has an opinion and she doesn't know much about it but if someone sits down with her she can change her mind. Nothing wrong with that.

Lovin McLovin but Joes point is that if you don’t know.. don’t have an opinion... she “claims ignorance” at same time as “it’s a hoax”, those 2 can’t be mutually exclusive ... it’s a problem in political commentary and people in general

Tobias..no Candace just makes everyone that's in a debate with her she makes the look dumb lol 😂..

Don’t argue with a stupid person. They’ll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Absolutely 💯 💯 💯

Why do the media give this unqualified dumbass a platform to spout bollocks.

@Michael Larkin Joe's level of informed is "It seems like we pollute a lot and that's probably bad". Meanwhile, Candace is trying to point out the FACT that every single climate prediction has been wrong, and in some cases the opposite happens.

“Arguing with a genius”

exactly!!! global warming was a fraud to tax people, regular citizens, while private company owners, industrial giants wipe their butts with those same bills.

It's on Spotify (episode #1125)

I’ll give Joe credit every time when he’s critical 👍

Joe Rogan needs to get himself educated around this subject. He and others in the comment section need to know how deep the rabbit hole runs. For starters, begin your adventure with Al Gore's professor. I promise you, it is damn good ride and it will change you completely whenever they start whining about climate change.

She’s is very nice to look at but not that bright. He has more patience than I.

@@stacychew4175 Oh bc you've seen one video of her talking about a topic that she barely knew about and Rogan stuck to because he wanted to make her look bad. Okay Stacy.

all of us as human beings needa strive to be like this honestly

Jeffrey Gandara takes humility, she doesn’t have that

@@deem10 Agreed. Everyone is an expert about their uneducated views on all things.

not when its global warming, the answer should always be yes there is

Climate change should be discussed between two scientists

How thick are you dweebs?...there is not one iota of credible peer reviewed scientific data which show a connection between global warming & global climate change...NOTHING.....local and regional weather/climate variations ..yes...and that's been known since the mid 19th century......but that has nothing to do with global warming trends......the IPCC are frauds....pathetic, amateur frauds who have stolen billions of research funds from legitimate scientists.....thus the US, China, Russia, Australia et etc will continue to build coal fired power plants cos they have nothing to do with global warming PS: it's the Sun, silly......ha ha ha ha

Alex Ignacio Jovel 😂😂😂😂

Second.

Alex Ignacio Jovel yea cause rogan is like an jr. high principal

Facts rogan act like you gotta straddle the fence all the time

Alex Ignacio Jovel I was gonna watch this while high, saw your comments, now I’m not gonna watc it.

Exactly only a fool needs evidence. Why is research so goddamn important can't you just feel how horrible the climate has, I mean it's no brainier

I wish I had Joe's patience...

He keeps it cool though

rahul mahbubani Climate Change isn't about how you feel climate has been changing, it's more about global changes across larger scales of time. So saying you feel it's gotten hotter isn't a good argument for climate change. Instead, point to all the scientific evidence of climate change.

Joe was HIGH KEY irritated ahahaha

Have you seen her medical report?? Stop insulting others.

Based on the fact that we are going through a cooling period for the last 15 years lol

Lmao.

A B You probably shouldn't use articles written by Christopher Booker. He believes in intelligent design and denies evolution and he also claims that asbestos and second hand smoke don't increase your risk of developing cancer. He is what you would call, a complete fucking moron.

Read above and I have lots more!

Who's more corrupt in Congress between the Republicans and the Democrats? " When comparing criminal indictments of those serving in the executive branch of presidential administrations it's so lopsided as to be ridiculous. Yet all I ever hear is how corrupt the Democrats are. So why don't we break it down by president and the numbers. Obama (D) - 8yrs in office. zero criminal indictments, zero convictions and zero prison sentences. so the next time somebody describes the Obama administration as "scandal free" they aren't speaking wishfully, they're simply telling the truth. Bush, George W. (R) - 8yrs in office. 16 criminal indictments. 16 convictions. 9 prison sentences. Clinton (D) - 8yrs in office. 2 criminal indictments. one conviction. one prison sentence. that's right nearly 8yrs of investigations. tens of millions spent and 30yrs of claiming them the most corrupt ever and there was exactly one person convicted of a crime. Bush, George H. W. (R) - 4yrs in office. one indictment. one conviction. one prison sentence. Reagan (R) - 8yrs in office. 26 criminal indictments. 16 convictions. 8 prison sentences. Carter (D) - 4yrs in office. one indictment. zero convictions and zero prison sentences. Ford (R) - 2 1/2 yrs in office. one indictment and one conviction. one prison sentence. Pardoned Richard Nixon. Nixon (R) - 6yrs in office. 76 criminal indictments. 55 convictions. 15 prison sentences. Johnson (D) - 5yrs in office. zero indictments. zero convictions. zero prison sentences. So, let’s see where that leaves us. in the last 53 years Democrats have been in office for 25 of those years while Republicans held it for 28. in their 25yrs in office Democrats had a total of three executive branch officials indicted with one conviction and one prison sentence. That's one whole executive branch official convicted of a crime in two and a half decades of Democrat leadership. In the 28yrs that Republicans have held office over the last 53yrs they have had a total of (a drum roll would be more than appropriate), 120 criminal indictments of executive branch officials. 89 criminal convictions and 34 prison sentences handed down. That's more prison sentences than years in office since 1968 for Republicans. If you want to count articles of impeachment as indictments (they aren't really but we can count them as an action), both sides get one more. However, Clinton wasn't found guilty while Nixon resigned and was pardoned by Ford. So, those only serve to make Republicans look even worse. With everything going on with Trump and his people right now, it's a safe bet Republicans are gonna be padding their numbers a bit real soon. So let's just go over the numbers one more time shall we. 120 indictments for Republicans. 89 convictions and 34 prison sentences. Those aren't "feelings" or "alternate facts" those are simply the stats by the numbers. Republicans are, and have been for my entire lifetime, the most criminally corrupt party to hold the office of the presidency.

Lol

She travels the same world where NFL teams are World Champs.

I mean...that isn’t an incorrect sentence. You can travel around the world AND see different parts of the U.S. I don’t agree with her, I’m just saying it’s not a bad sentence technically speaking.

Honestly Candice is an idiot

Perhaps the key word here is.... And

He still feels the same way because he’s not full blown MAGA, he still at least believes in science, something you probably don’t understand

@@hurricane0064 Aww! Did your leftist feelings get hurt? The science shows that You are A Dick!

@@hurricane0064 Ok Hurricane! The science guy! Haha!

@@chocolateforever63 earth is very much round you illiterate trash

@@chocolateforever63 bet you think Isaac Newton is a brand of cookies you uneducated 🐈

Horribly.

In bed as far as what? If it's selling arms to Saudi, then it's been done by previous administrations multiple times over the years

LoweRider Her claim is that Hillary Clinton was in bed with the Saudis *and* that Donald Trump changed that. Even supposing that he is doing exactly what past presidents had done*, you need to meet the other half of the claim: how did "Trump came in and said NO" with regard to the Saudis? Saying that he continued with business as usual with the Saudis does not meet that burden. *Ignoring, for example, that past presidents weren't making those sales over the objections of Congress in the wake of one of the most significant international human rights scandal of the past decade. The action is hardly the same when the context changes that much: it's one thing to buy some jewelry from a pawn shop, it's another thing to buy from that same pawn shop 10 minutes after the cops tell you that the pawn broker is a fence for local burglars.

LoweRider Ok. Trump said he would not be in bed with saudi arabia. Then sells $10 billion in weapons to them. Yea previous administrations did. But wasnt trump supposed to be different and end those corrupt practices? Yea fuckin right gimme a break. He did the opposite. Its ok you will concoct some excuse for him.

She obviously ignored the picture of trump holding that light sphere with the king of Saudi Arabia and all the gifts they gave him🙄but she’s a talking head being paid by the Koch Brothers to deny everything true and blame liberals for the world’s woes. www.nytimes.com/2017/05/22/world/middleeast/trump-glowing-orb-saudi.html

Bruh 😂😂

So you even know what that means???

Jeremiah Hessian yeah I think he knows what it means

Well, Joe kept pushing her back up the hill.

Candace doesn't make a good argument, but Joe arrogantly saying anthropogenic climate change is scientifically proven is not true.

It is a word though.

​@@bear3663 Only because it has been used so heavily. Its "definition" is regardless. The prefix ir is intended to change the meaning of the root word to the opposite of the root word. So irregardless should be the opposite of regardless which is essentially equivalent to saying nothing but instead its definition is stated as the very word it is meant to negate. It doesn't make any sense.

@@SolipsisStudios I'm glad that we can agree that it is a word. Language evolves, or we wouldn't have most of the words we have today.

It is a word now. It’s still entirely de-necessary though

@@Sam-rf6ev I realized that once I commented on it. But it is definitely de necessary lol

chris wells young Jamie checked her quick

Steve Hardy literally how I feel Rn 😂

We call it "second hand embarrassment"

@@kakashisensei8419 we call it cringe

It’s called cringe in america

There is a word in Spanish come mierda Google translate for this. Thats whats going on here. GW is real

99% of scientists also believe

Neither does Owens

@@sashaalex5476 yeah, beLIEve in it because that's what science is, a belief system. The Science = The Bible. Expert = Priest. The new secular religion is "safe and effective", just stay away from that horse dewormer. smfh at the science believers arrogance. Don't mistake intelligence with integrity. Look up the Asch and Milgram experiments and you'll see how easy it is to CONvince even intelligent people to be obedient puppets... who can then be used to misinform you.

Exactly. Joe says Candace shouldn’t have an opinion bc she doesn’t know. Proceeds to make an appeal to authority and say and insinuate the scientists are correct and then has the audacity to say he doesn’t know. Kettle meet black.

@@ScottTew Wait. If we dont believe scientists /in this case 97% of them/ Who do we believe? A bright girl that says " Cuz i dont believe in it"?

Einstein was a shill to market on. He even admitted Tesla was smarter.

Albert thought the Milky Way was the universe. Human stupidity can be read every day about climate change. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qJ-ZmtKgsb3ScmQ.html

Debra Hoffman ayyyy 🤣🤣🤣 your idiocy is beyond measure innit ? Roger Penrose was just awarded the nobel prize for his mathematical models that prove the existence of black holes as a prediction of Einstein's theory of general relativity. Meanwhile you’re an oxygen thief 🤷

Ooooooh. Einstein.... The guy who was ridiculed by the "scientific consensus" and his "collogues" for his theories and who famously said “Why 100? If I were wrong, one would have been enough." in response to them trying to discredit him even though he was later proven correct?... That guy? So much for consensus and Majority.

@@darianjohnston1658 what the fuck are you talking about? Have you ever read a single physics paper in your life?

This felt like an hour, not 20 minutes... my god

m3lon San, What Does Candace Owens_Farmer mean by her statement to Joe Rogan: " I'm Not So Sure, I Would Die on the Hill for It" ? I am so very Sorry, I do not Understand.

@@saitohshihomi5649 the fuck is wrong with you?

Yyyeessss that's fucking hilarious!!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Not true. Joe is arguing that we must all be scientifically agnostic... She is creating a hypothesis based on data too... This is America and the coversation is more about her belief of disbelief... Joe was so busy trying to convince her to stand on the fence that he didn't bother to take a beat to consider whether or not there may be truth in her Candace's suspicions that climate change has been hijacked by politics and people who can capitalize off of it... Just pause and think about how big the green industry is and how much money and trash is made from it. In NYC there are home owners and landlords who are removing perfectly good fixtures to update to green fixtures... Do you know how much money and garbage (that isn't biodegradable or recyclable) that generates? Candace's reservations are valid. But, instead of examining her point further Joe decides to try dragging her for saying she doesn't believe. Stay on the topic and destroy her argument instead or deflecting and attempting to assassinate her belief, or lack of belief system...

I’m Irish but what do u mean by that

@@MarkStoddard😂

I wish it would hurry up, not that it’s real of course

There is a limit to stupidity. Its called death.

That’s not the limit to stupidity, that’s the limit of everything

@@sheikmutanabi3003i feel as tho stupidity would be included in "everything"...

Derrick Henry why are you trying to sound smart when you know what he’s getting at. Who are u tryna impress lmao

This is a fake quote, he never said this.

I don’t many conservatives that like her a few people prop her because she’s an “empowered woman” but her ignorance is incredible

@@michaela1843 I really don’t get it. And she’s been on Twitter since the election telling lie after lie and supporting the accusations that the election was rigged.

that line there was when I walked away...........she needs to slow it down, and think before speaking

“I read a lot about it”

@@michaela1843 She also gets propped up because she's a person of colour promoting conservative viewpoints. She's a grifter who has to stay on character at all times. Who knows what she believes behind closed doors, tbh

lol 😂

It’s difficult to argue with geniuses. But impossible to argue with morons.

Which one is the stupid one? I hoping your talking Candace

@Your Older Brother you're right it was you

@@insanegenius5321 Candice is the moron who can’t listen to any perspectives besides trumpsters

@@steveharveyhd5289 exactly so just let Candice Owens speak because stupidity from her won’t stop 🛑

I almost lost it bawhahahahaha

Welcome to Trumpworld. What happened to intelligent conservatives? These are not conservatives, they are Trumpers.

@Real Progressives Allowed exactly

😭😭😂😂😂

@Real Progressives Allowed even if weather and climate mean the same thing, it’s still really stupid to compare the weather which varies everyday to the climate which is an average of the weather of a region or of a period of time

Very well said. We all have bias and skepticism but you can't just begin every topic assuming it's a conspiracy and a lie.

Nobody knows. It's not even a consensus in the scientific community. She's totally correct in just giving her opinion and saying what she believes or not. Believing is different than knowing. Joe, on the other side, has been pushing her all time to agreeing with his stance.

Otavio Limirio Farias it is literally 97% of active scientists. That is about as much of a consensus as you can get from the scientific community. It is a real thing. The only argument to be had on it is whether or not climate change is the result of human interaction.

@@otaviolimirio1 Believing is not different than knowing. Belief just means you think you know. If you dont know how to perform open heart surgery you dont say "i dont believe it's possible". You say "i dont know wtf im talking about so I'm going to stand back and let the experts handle this". She's somehow trying to have it both ways, by saying she neither understands the subject but also has enough information to flat out reject it, which makes no sense.

No, that's not the problem and disbelief should be the default. The problem is that she doesn't understand and confines to maintain her default position.

So Joe is stupid!

exactly. like joe's doing here.

@@drtimoshea4087sit down Candace

@@drtimoshea4087 the delusion is strong with you, young one 😅

@@TNTobin Ignorance is a lack of knowledge or understanding. Deliberate ignorance is a culturally-induced phenomenon, the study of which is called agnotology. "knowing better but doing the wrong thing anyway." Immoral describes people who can differentiate between right and wrong but intentionally do wrong anyway. Irrational would also describe such a behavior.

2:45 and I left. Rogan sounds like he's refusing to listen because she's a girl, and she quickly goes from making sense to seeming extremely incompetent

Agreed. He is finally trusting the science instead of the politicians. She came off pretty dumb here, but Joe eventually came around anyway.

Brian, you gotta get off the internet mate

Exactly. Finally he opened his eyes.

I tell my fuance this all the time... They cut down millions of trees that will help us to replace it with machines. This shit is idiotic. I believe this is a contributing factor why our earth is caving in. Tree roots are strong and hold so much together. We are parasites to this earth.

Apparently not enough people know about the function of trees, sad

its literally like the movie idiocracy, everyones like " it got electrolytes thats what trees crave"

@@Greenthumbn1576 and sea

Human beings cut down CO2 eating trees to make way for C02 producing humans! 3 billion people on earth till middle of last century. Over population is the reason for climate change

So can you explain to me why it went from global cooling, to global warming, then too climate change? Why does the name always change?

@@danielbaker7213 Because that's how science works. Once you are confronted with data that changes the reality of what your talking about, the name shifts to more accurately reflect that data. edit: also, if your goal is to convince laymen, people without no scientific background, that this highly complicated issue IS an issue, your going to try to use a name that will translate the best to the common population. Global warming was too inaccurate and reductive and confused the morons who went "OH BUT SOME PLACES ARE COLDER" so they changed it.

@@danielbaker7213 THAT'S what your argument is?

@@danielbaker7213 did you skip science class in school 😂

I remember learning in middle school science class weather is the day to day state of the atmosphere and climate is the long term state. She lost all credibility on the issue when she failed to understand that

Russian Bot8269 but we are making it worse

Joe Rogan : Excuse me sir, but I do believe you've dropped your wallet. This chick : Doesn't look familiar to me. Joe Rogan : What? I just saw you drop it. Here. This chick : Nope, it's not mine. Joe Rogan: It is yours. I am trying to be a good person and return it to you. This chick : Return what to who? Joe Rogan : [facepalms, then shows Patrick his ID] Aren't you Patrick Star? This chick : Yup. Joe Rogan : And this is your ID. This chick : Yup. Joe Rogan : I found this ID in this wallet. And if that's the case, this must be your wallet. This chick : That makes sense to me. Joe Rogan : Then take it. This chick : It's not my wallet.

O X that is debatable and not proven fact you are aware of that right? The common belief is more co2 equals higher temps which is true but do you know how many factors go into the temperature of the earth ? It’s not just co2 lvls lmao

E B I do know my handful share of information about he topic i took a university course on it it’s real man we make it worse

Russian Bot8269 because everyone has a car and everyone wants cow meat plus pollution in the ocean ruin coral reefs all of which contribute to the decrease of co2 reduction

I THINK I NEED THERAPY AFTER WATCHING SOME OF THIS......

@@quantumofhate I wish someone in my life would speak to me so patiently about my worst thoughts and ideas

Please tell me you're being sarcastic?

@@troyrichardson6575 I hope he is. She was pretty patient putting up with him interrupting her the whole time. What's funny is they both agree for the most part but Joe felt the need to act like there was some conflict to boost ratings, lol

@@aloha_ohana Oh Dave you silly little dolt.

Not control, just stop causing harm that will come back to bite us in the ass in the future. Same thing as using Acutane when you have really bad acne. It’s not going to get rid of the scars and previous damage, but you won’t have to deal with bad breakouts in the future.

Lmao that was funny

He was being rude to her and condescending. Newsflash, anthropogenic climate change is not a proven scientific fact, its barely a theory.

@@hepwo91222 Newsflash, it was 65 farenheit a few days ago in Antarctica. Newsflash, the UN report *made up of scientists* confirmed that we know that we are accelerating climate change at a dangerous rate. Newsflash, the only people who gain from denying climate change is oil companies who trash the environment.

@@hepwo91222 I'm on the side of Joe where I don't know enough about it to have an opinion on it. I don't care how many scientists say things or how much evidence they claim to have. I don't know therefore I won't claim to know and I don't care to know. Humans will be killed off but the earth will be just fine. I couldn't literally not care any less.

@@jakjam300 you have been brainwashed by the MSM and globalist politicians. Anthropogenic climate change is unproven, it fails the scientific method every... single... time. Also the climate models are based on incomplete data due to our inability to predict the movement of water vapor more than a few hours/days. So maybe one day when we can solve Navier-Stokes equations we can predict future climate but as of now, we cannot.

😂

@Anstapa Solivagus right

@Anstapa Solivagus absolutely right

wrong. theyre from Twitter

Usually when people say that and say that they don't remember the statistics, it means they didn't read about it at all

Jordan Peterson= GOAT

But not being open to learn is the problem

@@kaashviagarwal565 In general, yes. Not being open to learning is a problem. But it depends on what is being learned, as well as where and when.

You’re doing great. Keep being you, and don’t fall under the tribe mentality curse.

Never a truer word. Even thoughtful, clearly intelligent members of each group fall into the same trap. Candace said one truism in this clip but the significance was lost on her...at 4:48 she said "instead of looking for what you're searching for why don't you look up what you're not searching for". She's right. You could easily justify the opposite viewpoint of that was your goal and this betrays a real truth. In todays age a layperson can find evidence to corroborate any viewpoint they wish to hold. Confirmation bias and a limitless database of knowledge, opinion, spin, etc make it a simple matter. Did you ever watch a flat Earth video? They pull 'facts' from everywhere. It's almost convincing. Almost!

FACTS

that's not true. That's called identity politics and you shouldn't play that game. They play it a lot in the west but just because someone sides with a party that doesn't mean you believe everything one party does.

I don’t have a political party either but I’d never vote Democrat. I’d rather not vote at all

actually she admits it several times..right there this here video

@@Skate2rev but her responses were always I don’t know therefore I don’t believe it to be true when it could’ve just been I don’t know

well, she wouldn't have a career if she admitted to not knowing about anything now would she

@@Liza.Wharton yea

Yup. Another person too proud to say "I Don't Know" She's like "I don't know anything about it but I have a stance on it"

It’s not the same as a public majority opinion. These are people who devote their lives to studying this and are incredibly accomplished in their field. It’s not the same as asking John from Kansas what he thinks about climate change. Bad example

Is that what she said? Pretty sure her wording would've been "I don't believe you own a dog." Literally speaking there's a difference between "I don't believe you own a dog" and "I believe you don't own a dog", even though we interpret them the same. "I don't believe" means you have no belief either way (you don't know), "I believe you don't" means you believe the contrary. For some reason all of us interpret them the same way. I never considered the difference until she pointed out they may have a difference in linguistics. Either way she definitely should've said "I don't know" to be clear.

More like "I don't know whether you have a dog or not, BUT, there's a dog house in your front yard, there's some dog toys and chewed up rags lying around, there's some dog shit in your backyard, the cats stay the fuck away from your house, oh and I hear some barking coming from your house. Hmmm, nope I don't buy it. You don't have a doggo."

she only exists so that the right can point to her and say “seeeee? our policies aren’t racist. a black person supports them!!” a sad existence, indeed

@@serclintalot4497 dude the entire video she’s like “I don’t know anything about this, but here’s my detailed opinion. very obviously trying to push the right’s climate science denial propaganda while also giving herself an out if she’s ever called out about this video

@@sub-zero5433 The video only exists because he interpreted "I don't believe" to mean "I vehemently oppose" and decided to grill her on it. Yes, she should have just said "I don't know" but she tried to end it several times, he got more aggressive, and she got defensive. Regardless, what does it matter at this point? It's not like the left has any viable solutions other than griping about it and pointing fingers at the other side.

Or in one night! While it takes scientist their whole life to understand it. This lying fake poser says its not true because she read it one night! Unbelievable

@@ruubs9615 She thinks that she is the second coming of Einstein 🤣. Joe was very generous in calling her Intelligent.

Never use absolutes.

@@edaboodie6346 that's in itself an absolute haha

Haha

She didnt say that. She said it always changed.

@@sitrep2418 But how much does she really know about it? She'd be utterly lost two minutes into a climate science examination. You know it and I know it.

Show me the evidence that humans affect the total temperature of the planet. Oh, and do it without NOAA adjusting data. And go.

@@tln25 www.ucsusa.org/resources/are-humans-major-cause-global-warming www.eea.europa.eu/themes/climate/faq/how-do-human-activities-contribute-to-climate-change-and-how-do-they-compare-with-natural-influences rses.anu.edu.au/research/research-stories/humans-have-caused-climate-change-180-years www.edf.org/climate/9-ways-we-know-humans-triggered-climate-change And I'm sure, even with all this statistical information and scientific explanations, you will still come up with some bullshit to say it's fake. And if you do, why don't you provide evidence as to why it's not caused by humans.

@@sitrep2418 correct she didn't say the climate changes everyday - she said the climate always changes. It's not unusual to see mis-quotes. "So what you're saying is.."

Lol

She is just like TRUMP. Or imitating Trump.

Because he is forcing the question.

@@hunali7343 he is trying to understand why she thinks that way

@@antoinecharlesdegaulle580 she said i haven’t formed opinion and I don’t believe it in. He is like it’s science and stuff she told him she does not have an opinion.

I don't believe the narrative either, but Candace is shyte in trying to argue the point.

Hilariously, her website is a .com site (I bet she has something to say about .pizza sites too)

@Fl Beats And CNN ? Predictions? Facts: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qJ-ZmtKgsb3ScmQ.html

I don't know how anyone can ever believe *anything* if you are that cynical...

Shes so close minded

@@johndeoliveira8476 She used to be ... a democrat. Sorry.

robby cox she is beyond irritating

Of the 10,000 or so scientists who are saying this, how many of them get their funding from companies or businesses that would profit from it

“Scientists? Must be democrats.”

@Desert Ratt and what makes you think Candace isn’t being paid by people who benefit from fossil fuels?

Creed Thoughts don’t expect a response

Ahoy and Aloha, I am so very Sorry I Do Not Understand What is The Hill, Where is The Hill that WE Are Not Going to Die On? Please Clarify my ignorance!?

@@saitohshihomi5649 she says she doesn’t believe despite knowing absolutely nothing about it. That’s the hill and joe Rogan was the one to finish her.

@@Liam-uh3pr How exactly did he "defeat" her? By claiming that 97% of scientists believe in human-caused climate change?

@@Jianju69 by confronting her on the topic and instead of just letting it go she continues to defend her position fully aware that she knows without the knowledge. She is a drifter she spins the points To confuse the viewer fully aware of the fact that she is just trying to score political points.

@@Liam-uh3pr that's half true. analyze the video and what was said. she claimed to be of the opinion that global warming wasn't a concern to her in the context of being in an international agreement where trillions were involved. joe Rogan then said, why have a belief on something you know nothing about. the difference in the understanding is the word opinion and belief, they are not the same but are used similarly to literally and figuratively.

LMFAO

Joe has had a paradigm shift since to say the least. Jesus christ is coming back for the rapture. Get ready. Unprecedented times coming ahead.

But Joe still supports the science on climate change. So…..

Yes it has.

politics + science = politics

She is knowing the difference. The facts just dont fit her agenda

Rogan is clearly wrong here about The climate change issue and is forcefully argueing with faulty facts. You could say hes bringing forth the globalists agenda. See the respons and links to real scientists about this climate change debate: Hello Andreas! Thank you for your inquiry. This is a curious petition which seems to have been hastily put together and not well vetted. "Mickey Mouse" was one of the signatories. (attached) It has some similarities to a similar petition of some years ago with 15,000 signatories - of which Adolf Hitler had signed. blog.friendsofscience.org/2017/11/20/the-petition-of-more-than-15000-scientists-more-fakenews/ As many commentators have noted, most of the signatories do not work in climate science assessments but rather in fields like biology. While there is a component of climate change impacts on biology inherent in that field of study, climate change is measured on very long time scales of 30, 50, 100 and millennial time scales. We do not have sufficient data to make pronouncements about climate change like those made by this group. William Briggs, statistician, has written a biting critique wmbriggs.com/post/28490/ There is much debate in the climate community - the Spilman Law firm hosted this debate: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ot9-ds9os-DOkYE.html We have hosted annual events since our inception, hoping to encourage open, public debate and to inform people of the complexities of climate science. friendsofscience.org/index.php?id=308 Dr. Judith Curry states that climate change is not a clear or present danger. wattsupwiththat.com/2019/07/16/climatologist-dr-judith-curry-climate-change-is-not-a-clear-and-present-danger/ Unfortunately, the media love frightening headlines and many environmental groups drive donations with ever more catastrophic claims. We are in favour of open, civil debate on climate and energy policies and full cost-benefit analysis. A group of international scientists have stated there is no climate emergency. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fdaGdaterb-Zf6s.html I hope this is helpful information. Best wishes, Michelle Stirling Communications Manager -- Friends of Science Society P.O. Box 23167, Mission P.O. Calgary, Alberta Canada T2S 3B1 Toll-free Telephone: 1-888-789-9597 Web: friendsofscience.org

@@andreaserik6069 nice propaganda

I'm not here to argue climate change. I'm just pointing out how much it says about someone when they would rather have an opinion about something they clearly know very little about, as opposed to having the courage to say they don't know enough about it to form an opinion in the first place. That is our current political landscape in a nutshell.

@Andreas erik Im german and human made climate change is the consens here. But nice try strange youtube guy

She’s never heard the term “well educated opinion” but then again she probably doesn’t know what educated means

@@callumrock11lol76 education doesn’t mean you’re right. Just like college these days teaches bs 20% of the time.

Research.... every right wingers Kryptonite

Do research never means do and actual scientific research on your own. Now it's time for aliens.👽

It's proven bro. I am right wing, conservative, anti-communist, anti-sjw, anti-big state and I believe in climate change. It's proven by science. Not flat-earth bs. Serious stuff man. m.kzfaq.info/get/bejne/oJyZeJljz9XafaM.html 👽

@Julie She's not even a bulb. She's like trying to screw a shoe into a light socket...

Her point being is that she is respectfully engaging in the topic at hand because its just the 2 of them talking. As in, she means that she isn't trying to persuade anyone whatsoever during this exchange.. Its obvious only Joe Rogan is trying to do the persuading. @JULIE & JAMES! Are you this ignorant? Bc Joe clearly proves he is the one with the agenda by getting upset that she "as an influencer" is stating she doesn't share the same beliefs as him!!

@@teejay3193 It may have been just the 2 of them talking, but it wasn't just the 2 of them listening to the conversation, unless she just drew a blank and forgot that their conversation was being recorded on one of the most listened to podcasts...

@@teejay3193 Joe's point is that as an influencer she can't just state her feelings as if they're more important than facts because she has a responsibility as a public figure not to misinform people.

@@teejay3193 lol, so you disagree with his point that you shouldn't be opinionated on something you know nothing about? yeah he's the bad guy here.

Science is the new religion ... when it is on your side.

Co-founder of green peace. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gL-BaciLqb68gnk.html&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR1pl1JZVJpv_oP0lENw1J5S1sA8_BROA8g4QS4RJUgcDCHEf9Npzm_U0SA

Science shouldn’t be based on beliefs.

Yeah it's ridiculous to the point where it's almost kinda funny how people still don't get that science is based on actual data haha 😂 she even outright compares it to religion! 😂 This is why I'm quite sure we'll never be able to PRACTICALLY implement what we already know is necessary to solve the problem, hell, WE ARE the problem! We deserve to die, plain and simple. Even if there have been/are/will be amazing fantastic human beings that very much don't deserve to die they'll ALWAYS be VASTLY outnumbered by idiots, sadly... Unless we by some miracle can remove the stupid gene from our DNA, but even then it's probably too late... I'm impressed by Rogan's patience here, it must be so frustrating. Nah just don't read up on something that might mean our ultimate demise, just be chillin' and read some random news articles and decide you won't BELIEVE there's a problem, see how that works out genius 👍 the sad thing is that SHE'S not the one that'll suffer the consequences, but OH how I wish these stupid kinds of people would be the ones to do so, would warm my heart, no pun intended...

@@carlandersson6241 so I'm guessing you are also one of those people who just believe everything in these political discussions... check the link I posted above. An interview with the founder of green peace. He states that the climate crisis is bull shit. Despite your long winded rant on how much humans suck, it is a political.matter and not a 100% science based one. There is research on both sides, so yes, you can believe what u want.

hour?! more like a few minutes

@@keithwrx8 I stand corrected

Her and Tomi Lahren both.

Not if she has clothes on.

@@kpllc4209 yooooo. maybe too far

Don't worry, she believes it. But she won't admit it. That's the difference. All politicians say they believe or don't believe something, because that's how they got where they are, by playing their voters. It's only after their voters' opinion is shifting, they start to shift. Shifting too early, or too late is political suicide.

Haha I could easily go register a .com and a .org website on GoDaddy ffs. How does a .com site mean its making money lol

and she believes in capitalism, .org is socialist haha

Because its not an opinion its a scientific fact

@@wolowizard4364nope, even Joe Rogan changed his mind about it. lol

No, he didn’t. That’s a moronic assumption.

@@mpwest929 yes, yes he has.

Typical Ben Shapiro tactic..

@@ahmedhashmi3584 All famous rightwingers are embarrassing. Literally all of them.

@Toori Baba Jordan Peterson isn't a rightwinger. I only meant it in the politician + political commentator sense. Donald Trump, Mike Pence, mini Trumps, Mitch Mcconnell, Paul Ryan, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Sarah Palin, Rand Paul, Bill Barr, Stephen Miller, Lindsay Graham, Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones, Rush Limbaugh, Candace Owens, Chris Christie, Sean Hannity, Anne Coulter, Laura Ingraham, Tomi Lahren, etc.

@Toori Baba False. "Trump registered as a Republican in Manhattan in 1987, switched to the Reform Party in 1999, the Democratic Party in 2001, and back to the Republican Party in 2009." So he's been a Democrat 8 years, a Republican for 23 years, and in the Reform Party for 2 years. And aside from being a registered Republican for 75% of the past 30 years, he's an extreme rightwing Republican right now. I get why you're trying to distance yourself from him, because he's as embarrassing as they come, but he's firmly in your camp.

@Toori Baba I've never read so much bullshit in one KZfaq comment before. Trump follows the teachings of Jesus Christ? Hahahaha. Hahahaha. I'm not even going to waste my time commenting on all the other false stuff you just spewed.

We’re children

@@Robertedwinhouse38 Deep truth

I caught that. Crazy lady

@Cools DOODS yeah I really can’t wait to how they will react when they see the world start to go to ruins because conservatives are this fucking stupid. I really hope we can save the world from conservatives and get rid of them to hopefully save wha little of the world we have left. Honestly sad man

@CashMoney Presedent yeah conservatism is an ideology that goes against itself and forces everyone to comply to the harsh and sickening demands of what it has to Offer

She's paid not to accept the facts. She's a right wing grifter.

Lots of people do the same shit lol

The so-called facts from the global warming doomsday cult is data that was fraudulently “adjusted” to prove their case. The 1930’s was always the warmest decade in recorded history until the temperatures were adjusted downward by the cult.

She's a brainwashed shill who profits from spreading this nonsense.

Tol, R. S. J. (2014). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the literature: A re-analysis. Energy Policy, 73, 701-705. doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.045

powerful

You think she's serious? I always had the idea that she's just exploiting a base for financial gain. Even in this video, there's a couple times when she seems like she doesn't even believe the bullshit coming out of her mouth. I think it's all an act. She's no better than that Tom MacDonald rapper, who does the same exact thing.

@@bryanf1091 she’s 100% exploiting but when you say stuff numerous times no matter how big the lie is you eventually start to believe it.

@@bryanf1091 I guess it comes down to what serious means. Whether or not she really believes it ends up being kind of irrelevant if she's willing to act as though it's true for extended periods of time. As we saw with Trump, if people are willing to exploit falsehoods for personal gain, it sets the world back precisely the amount to which it's exploited, whether it's true or not.

Or sell your soul for the $