That made me howl 😂

Its not just game to game consistency, its also how well he played at international level and across multiple leagues (which he didnt)

@@DailyDoseOfFootballYT i'd take the midfield triad of Lampard, Ballack and Essien over Xavi, iniesta and Busquets why watch Chelsea vs Barcelona in the 2000s that triad does not get the respect they deserve

Lampard in euro 2004 5 games 3 goals 1 assist. Team of the tournament. So he did do well for england at some point.

@@DailyDoseOfFootballYT record goal scorer from midfield for England. Consistent enough for you? Plus it wasn’t his fault his goal against Germany was ruled out.

@@DailyDoseOfFootballYT so messi isnt consistent right? only one league and shit for argentina

When i saw that goal i cried cum and had to go to the hospital only to learn i suffered multiple eye orgasms.

Andrew Smith I know right. The next mark was 7/10 for flair 😂😂 Lampard consistently scored more goals than any other midfielder in top flight world football for the best part of a decade. 7/10 for flair is maybe right as he has it in his locker but never really used tricks as he was that good at the basics. He needs a 9 or 10 for consistency though

" 7/10 for flair is maybe right as he has it in his locker but never really used tricks as he was that good at the basics" you got it right honestly, it's really about how much of a showboat you were

It's not game to game consistency only, it also takes into account how well he performed across multiple leagues and well he barely left Chelsea, so you know, its hard to access

Daily Dose Of Football tbh I think the system of ranking consistency based on playing in other leagues is unfair. The EPL is the most competitive league in world football. It's like you are punishing him for playing in the best league for so many years. Why would he want to lower his game by playing in Spain or Italy for example? If he did that then his consistency for England would have dropped.

Daily Dose Of Football you are basically saying the Ryan Giggs and Paul Scholes will be ranked low for consistency based on the fact that they only played for one club in one league. They did consistently win the league though so I think the category and marks handed out are all wrong imo

I was with you until you said better than Xavi and Iniesta…. You missed with that one

@@olatundeoladipo3025 if he wasn't english you'd definitely say he was better then xaxi and iniesta

Thanks man, means a lot.

Any feedback on what maybe I could do better? Also, subscribe for more content every week

Thanks man, perhaps one day, I surely hope so

@@DailyDoseOfFootballYT the videos are good but not your rating

Describing him as a 'workhorse' doesn't do him justice. His passing range and vision were incredible, not a pass he couldn't play. His reading of the game trumps most players to have played his position and his goal/ assist numbers are among the greatest in the history of the sport for a midfielder. Also, his consistency was unbelievable.

He’s only been manager for 2-3 years. Damn right less said about manager career, he has only gotten started.

@@leeallen3109 His passing range and vision were very good at times, but there is a reason why its not mentioned up there with the Xavi, Alonso, De Bruyne, Pirlo, Scholes, Kroos, Silva, Riquelme, Sneijder and Messi's of the world. I wasn't trying to undermine his passing abilities, I'm just highlighting the fact that he wasn't elite in that area by any means.

@@langletprolet8378 He's been a manager for more than four years and has been given jobs, that are far beyond his current scope. That's not to say he can't improve and get better (he did it as a footballer, despite not being the most naturally gifted). So there's every possibility, that he could become a good manager. Right now on the balance of probability, it looks like he will end up being a bottom half of the table manager i.e Dyche, Allardyce, Bruce etc. Don't forget, Bruce was an excellent defender who played at the highest level. If you didn't know his past, you would never think that about him now. So just because Lampard played at the highest level, it doesn't mean that become a world class manager is his birthright. It doesn't work like that, you have to earn your stripes and Lampard isn't doing that right now. So my comment is still valid and relevant over a year later.

Because of daily dose of Internet?

Yeah, Try come up with something you’d click on!

@@Absolut-ds5sm yeah guess that makes sense

Thank you 🙌, there's a few new ones already, sorry it took so long to reply

no he didn't, the most he got was 12 and it's Lampard in the MLS

@@DailyDoseOfFootballYT Just checked. 2015-2016 season. 29 appearances for NYC, 15 goals. Your source is wrong. Also if you wanna talk about consistency, man scored 20 goals for four straight seasons from Midfield. He is still the highest scoring midfielder in Premier Legue History. Man also broke the record for most consecutive games played.

You also say his trophy cabinet is unimpressive. Bruh, seriously? Man has won all major tournaments. I mean what standards are you basing this comparison on? That Chelsea isn't Barcelona not doing 3-4 cups a year? If you just look at his base contributions, man has more assists and goals than Iniesta, Xavi, Giggs etc.

Yes The video was very good .... But I as well as his stats dont agree with the rating you gave him at last.

You're so nice, maybe one day it will have a lot, until then I'll keep working hard

Came back to say I'm at 1000 now ahah

So happy for you bro,keep producing the awesome content

Wait when did I say David Beckham won the Ballon D'Or? Edit: Yeah when I said david beckham I was refering to what I had just said which was finishing second not winning, which he did after united's treble season behind Rivaldo I think

It's consistency and adaptability across the different competitions and leagues, he never left Chelsea for another club in his prime and had an underwhelming international career, can't give him higher than 6. Ofc if it was a game to game consistency he'd get like an 8-9

Every player doesn't roam around the whole world to get a tag of consistency ,he has every single trophy he could with Chelsea and by your logic messi's consistency should also be 6 because he hasn't won anything with Argentina and now don't say Messi scores a hell lot of goals and so do lampard as a midfielder is goal machine

@@DailyDoseOfFootballYT Haha stupid answer... I liked your video but you dont need to rate or analyze player because your analogy is poor.... You can just talk about the player and his career.... If you cant do it right, dont do the ratings ! But keep making videos .....

@@DailyDoseOfFootballYT Wish you luck !

@@DailyDoseOfFootballYT Lol, better follow darts or something...since you don't understand football. Dumbest logic ever, players should force themselves to change environment constantly just to prove some nimrod like you they can adapt? Lampard is one of the best midfielders of all time, and it's not because of his wild talent, but because of his mentality and work rate. As far as international careers go, if you knew anything about football, you'd know that random factor is high in football. In other words, you need a big sample of games to make any kind of decent analysis. Tournaments of max 6 or 7 games are not a good measure of how good some team really is, let alone a player lol. England did not win any major trophies, but Lampard's performances were still good and better than most there (like Gerrard for example). This is especially true for the last 25-30 years or so because prior to that most national teams rosters consisted mostly of players who played in 2-3 teams and they played together all the time. Nowadays they're scattered all over Europe and not only that, but the seasons are so long and the number of games a year constantly increases so UEFA can make more money, so national team competitions are often lackluster and players are in general drained after a long season, that especially goes for Premier league players. Also, why the fuck would Lampard want to go to some other league, when Premier league was and still is the most competitive league? Not only do you have most teams actually competing for the title every year, but even the lower tier teams are motivated and will go against you tooth and nail. Barcelona, Real and Bayern for the most part have easy seasons and can focus more easily on CL campaign. Ok, in the last years Atletico emerged as a contender too, but otherwise it was mostly between Barcelona and Real lol, even if they lost a bunch of games no other team could capitalize on that in Primera. As for Bundesliga, that's a fucking joke. If you knew anything about football, you'd know that there is an unwritten agreement there that Bayern has first pick on any transfer within the league. Not only that, but the whole league serves as a glorified training camp for Bayern, the teams are just strong enough to give them a good and serious training session, but not nearly strong enough to actually win the league. Here and there Dortmund is able to do something, but that's about it. Usually the only time when Bayern loses the league when a bunch of their players are retiring or they're rebuilding the team and at the same time another team has a really good generation (and Bayern takes half of their best players or more next season lol). Longevity 8/10 hahahaha. Do you even understand what kind of conditioning and discipline is needed to play on that level for so long in the strongest league in the world, with the most games out of all leagues (when you combine cups etc.)? Not only that, but Lampard hardly ever choked, he was consistent throughout his career. How the fuck can you question the longevity of a guy that plays that many games in physically most demanding league in the world, never really has a bad season (even if his team had some)? He was fucking phenomenal deep into his 30s and for majority of his career, he played 90 min games or close to, at some point playing like 160 consecutive games without missing one. Last but not least, the trophy cabinet lol. This is what happens when a person with low IQ, no understanding of the sport and no knowledge in proper INTERPRETATION of statistics starts making videos about anything. Lampard's trophy cabinet is extremely impressive. Trophies like Ballon d'Or are nice, but they are 90% politics and there is no clear criteria when awarding them. One year it's the player who left the best impression, next year the guy who scored most goals, the next is the guy who will sell most shirts or make money for various companies and investors etc. If you analyze it year by year, there are many inconsistencies, double standards and sometimes pure lunacy and stupidity. Playing in Premier league at that level, being so consistent for so many years and winning all those trophies is absolutely phenomenal. The competition was insane for most of those years and Lampard's contribution to Chelsea winning them was absolutely vital. Again, national team trophies are nice to have but since football has such high random factor, it's too small a sample of games to actually determine who's best. Not just that, but those performances are often romanticized just because some team won or reached the finals, but they often fall apart under minimal analysis. What matters when it comes to Frank's national career is that he performed well for England and was mostly consistent, the fact that he never claimed a major trophy is beside the point. People heavily romanticize Zidane's 1998. and 2006. performances at WC, even though they were nothing special for a player of such skill. In 1998. he left his team hanging cause he stomped the Arabian guy on the ground and just because he scored 2 goals in the finals against Brazil who were dazed with Ronaldo having convulsions prior to the final. France won that WC with their diamond hard defence, not because of Zidane. In 2006. he played great against a weird Brazilian team full of stars that played like shit and people made a fucking movie out of it lol, and he left his team hanging again in the finals. His best performance for the national team was Euro 2000., there he really shined but hardly anyone mentions that because morons romanticize his 2 goals against Brazil in 1998. and his good performance against them in 2006. In general, Zidane's whole career is vastly overrated because his style of play was so beautiful to watch and some of his moves were replayed so many times that people got into their heads that he did this every game. Truth is, he was wildly inconsistent throughout his career and wasn't even able to lead Juventus to 2x CL titles and 2x Scudetti when Del Piero was struggling with injuries and regaining top form after them. Almighty Zizou wasn't able to lead ultra powerful Juve to win those competitions against Mickey Mouse opponents (when compared to Juve at that time). Lampard is the best midfielder of his generation. Not the most talented and he certainly didn't have the best high peak, but his work rate, consistency, minimal number of bad or lackluster performances, insane amount of goals and assists, professionalism, the ability to stay on such high level for so many years etc. is certainly nothing short of amazing. Some players were better than him in terms of skillset, but he was so well rounded and last so long that when you draw the line after the entire career, most of them pale by comparison. One of the reasons why he's underrated (especially by people like you) is because he was such a team player, and those players usually never get the credit they deserve.

Luís Figo was way better in my opinion, I would have rated him even higher but I try to be unbiased here

@@DailyDoseOfFootballYT dude you have lampard below gorge weah in your ranking that just show I can't take you serously .

Lanpard

Yeah i agree lol. There will be a video eventually to fix some of the issues with the ranking. What comment tho?

lol figo was an overated winger lampard scored 2 times the goals plus figo got 50 goals in 300 madrid games avergae of 6 a season

@@itsnotme6316 he was not a goalscoring winger you haven't watched figo

Eventually I wanna do a 1 hour long video for him

Did you do that for any other player?

@@juanobiangmbaona1750 Did I do 'what' for any other player?

@@nicksim1602 not you, I am referring to daily dose of football, did he do a 1h long time on any other player?

U joking

@@amppa4781 No

@@yesthisisme2284 good laugh buddy