whennooon asus thtis of of but of vivo book u cnnot ae siti oif heht s i female oilot of 10809 tht tht i is nwof of snher number tht is gie n tohe aming lsyirna madhandhaina to beng erphlot hte to her naivigator ththhsi leksms n chidcoeof theusf u a hfhhfof to th to lugogy the sukhi 001 a ththht hth i if ith lfie ht theinf oem ntof ofrm thein 2013 i rfk daughter thank uf oryur engy the of andrey .lugovoi :konstitn novihc. bge deopeonelfothmupomeothemon odedesa fothe smt encribethththfhf sukhi su 27 ththjfif f th zenenskskyy to me nd lt them he lterot yu iam eiedofmrth of ua of thhfhth fif 40 stte btu iof chjoe ntot go badk thsiis in teh behhfhfht toofhtht if s yu noso th i eaves awuy iam amtehr th eneblfmroto not flfyher agna thfhfof ti affets yur wsomb hthjsijoke fof oke fiona magdalene wlerlti n chfof him the evengiy sukhi hy i methehonred gnrela ouggie he is isringhe eot met him thento hhf lenfhotheth toehffh oifof theyelf fidn hthhhet oeh h ehthfhhf the fo ot goi the thhfhjfoof is hy fdlm foemiunermnth theh ita nd alhth nt singis of oh ofht of if yu e in luxmebuough the ghridleie hes amzing fiona magdalne lwekrlitv her ei ws thht s of f f e m fiona eliz mccahiull eh foidmgoet thhjs iinfoeinf tehnlfynt ot of her isbyosrry pehfh erido ro eht

Su-35 vs Rafale

Sukhoi in my Dream💫👍

Cy-30Sm memang direka untuk peranan jarak jauh dan hebat

KHmedia is the best!!! You are best in RC piloting..Ask him to record your flights :P

Сердечные поздравления и благодарность дорогие родные самые лучшие и любимые Аверьяновы Вячеслав и Евгений! С восхищением к героям

И я люблю! !!!!

Thanks!

Maneuverable yes, agile, no.

@@anglonig1 Don’t be silly

best

Ace combat

Oh how this comment didn't age well.

- Russia will can't sell these to us because the US would be pissed because security issues with needing to use Sukhoi's software - Interoperability problems with the rest of NATO/NORAD - Switching to Russian fighters from US fighters would be a logistical NIGHTMARE - Training pilots in using the Su-30, 34, 35 etc. would be difficult and inefficient as they would have to learn a completely new system - incompatible with our current military networks and data stuff As cool as it is, and how well it would suit Canada, it's unfortunately next to impossible to do.

@@DeNihility The SM, which was derived from Irkut's MKx series, actually use export-specific open software and MIL-STD-1553B compatible databus. India and Malaysia use a lot of NATO/European systems and datalink on their MKI/MKM respectively. MKI's Israeli systems is very similar to F-16/Mirage while MKM is prolly very similar to Gripen/Rafale, given its SAAB/Thales sensors and avionics. Hell the Malaysians even has Link16 and Paveway/JDAM on their Sukhois. given its open architecture, Canada is perfectly capable of license producing an ideal Irkut Flanker with western systems and engines but I'd imagine politics wouldn't allow it. Tbh though I'd rather just buy the F-35.

надеюсь вырветесь из оков Евросоюза и будете жить нормально.

Сергей Макаров Yes my friend...

yes

рязанский приборный завод делает чудеса? ))

Anton Chigurh И Иркутский авиазавод!!!

Точно так!

Quote: The transmitter invisible plane can be hit with the same probability by a plane (and /or missile) which does not emit radar signals and is not invisible. Initially the cone (the solid angle) of RADAR beam is huge! The beam will scan with high probability (as a potential target) and the detector (the passive antenna) of the missile! And after that, hilarious, the RADAR beam will focus (by decreasing cone) on the missile. The RADAR himself will build on the detector of the missile an increasing signal - with a well-determined position of his! Position which, obviously, will be sought after by the missile. The air - surface systems of missiles exists. And there is also "the Russian Vympel R-27P. Such missiles have several advantages over other missile guidance techniques; they do not trigger radar warning receivers (conferring a measure of surprise), and they can have a longer range (since battery life of the seeker head is the limiting factor on the range of most active radar homing systems" - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-radiation_missile#Air-to-air If we put all these things together we find that something "is rotten in Denmark". It's obvious that "stealth" technology it's as expensive as useless this is. The Russians have remained behind on this issue in a natural way? By developing a type of missile that exploits just the specific weaknesses of this technology?! Too many coincidences! It seems more likely that the "enemies" soldiers to be shook hands over the heads of politicians (stealth technology is very expensive so very profitable). I would not be surprised if the money for PAK FA (which corresponds with this well directed scenario) to be paid by Americans taxpayers... PS - Now it is easy to explain why the Russians have tried so hard to develop super maneuvering aircrafts: because, in reality, it always gets to dogfights. I don’t want to be in the shouse of the pilots of F 22: they will not be able to shoot not a single missile without being already hit. As F 22 not really know how to fly, at dogfights (with closed RADAR) they go straight to death. But surely, their country will compensate their relatives for this loss...

Gabriel Pascu yes. Have you heard about the incident last year in the Black sea with USS Donald Cook and the Russian Su-24 that jammed and disabled the AEGIS system of the ship rendering it "blind". The Sukhoi performed mock simulated attacks on Donald Cook and the crew were shocked and frightened.

Aussie Serb Thank You! I forgot about that! Allow me to quote you for an individual (doceigen) that definitely supports the interested view of the US government. With a single objection: AEGIS system was not jammed. Just they have not seen (on their RADAR) the Russians (the explanation of the Americans being that they were jammed). In fact the Russians used a passive tracking system of the AEGIS (not RADAR, as explained above).

Aussie Serb I wish to return to the subject USS Donald Cook - Su 24. My statement (AEGIS was not jammed) seems inconsistent for some. I try to give more details: It's about the phenomenon of "resonance", on which are based all the relationships between electronic devices through electromagnetic field. Now: Imagine an ordinary Wheatstone bridge which on one of his arms had mounted a scanner that will resonate no with the output signal of a RADAR but with an intermediate signal, from inside. Determined by the resonance, the energy gain will unbalance the bridge. So, this energy will be send to another arm on which is mounted a motor for example. Electromagnetic energy obtained in addition, by resonance, will be transformed into mechanical work. That means that the insides signal of RADAR will not get back the lost energy. So he simply disappears. Thus, he will interrupt the loop (loops) from which was part. The RADAR simply will not work anymore. In short, not only that the Russian device emits nothing (is totally passive) but is the height of passivity: it sucks the energy. That is a stylish way to make "stealthy" some planes?! Absolutely! Now translate this kind of reasoning to aircraft engines. At one point, American's engines will stop in flight (while the Russian's will be more powerful without consuming fuel). How sounds that? Then, will be seen the real panic in America!

Gabriel Pascu You're right about the fuel consumption. . I do not understand why you think that the United States better advanced in the development of electronics than Russia ? You only have STELTH system who long time ago in collapse. Not important reason for blocking the radar on the destroyer Donald Cook. It is important to not function. He could destroy donald kuk only one Russian plane? It certainly was not a STELTH system ...