Su-30SM MAKS 2007 2009

Рет қаралды 51,027

13 жыл бұрын

Su-30MK demonstration flight. This two seats fighter looks really big. Slow and graceful flying. Too bad in 2007 & 2009 he doesn't perform Colbit maneuvers.

Пікірлер: 84

@aryanpers4173 4 жыл бұрын

Master of the sky dancing on his stage, beautiful!

@gtamodman122 12 жыл бұрын

@popmerde The Raptor is another story, the US did a hell of a job with its stablity and performance, but it's the TVC that makes it agile.If it wasn't for the TVS,I'd be surprized if it would actually be able to turn. Ontopic:the Su-30MK is one of the most maneuverable aircraft on the planet, no need to compare it with anything.

@TheKaMeLRo 2 жыл бұрын

I love this camouflage, best one.

@ortodoxchristian7781 8 жыл бұрын

Enough only one word for all Russian planes and pilots. PERFECTION. Everything else is superfluous.

@joeybohher696 13 жыл бұрын

2:53 great turn!!! amazing

@Leon-Hardt 6 жыл бұрын

05:15 Holy..............!

@user-xt1vz2ff1q 2 жыл бұрын

Супер 👍

@MrSuhoj 13 жыл бұрын

wow!!!! :)

@akula_9784 2 жыл бұрын

I love the camouflage 🇷🇺👌👍💪

@user-ek8mz7qh7h 6 жыл бұрын

Крутая тьехника пилатьирования , спасибо за видос . 😎

@dbcobbster 2 жыл бұрын

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

@user-yy1rs3df3q 13 жыл бұрын

Excellent!

@Rouhollah74 11 жыл бұрын

IRST functions independently of radar.This is what makes for example a MiG-29 capable of a passive stealth attack.Although IRST has a limited range.But once you've got enough heat signature from the target,you don't need a target lock.

@gtamodman122 12 жыл бұрын

@mauricioalfredo83 The Su-27's chassis is truly an amazing piece of art.It is aerodynamically neutral, and that's what gives it its agility.Many countries have developed fighters with a great level of maneuverability, but no nation has ever achieved what the Russians did with the Su-27. P.S. Just for the record, the F-22's TVC is 2D ;)

@ziopanayotou6927 Жыл бұрын

Mon frére. ❤❤

@iamnosheep4u 11 жыл бұрын

Good plane! we,the Netherlands should buy this plane,far better then the F35!

@gtamodman122 11 жыл бұрын

IRST has to be guided to a target somehow.It needs to be shown where the target is, it is a TV camera not an IR seeker (although it can sort of function as one).MiG-29s are capable of stealth attacks only with the use of heat-seeking versions of missiles like the R-24 or R-27, and that's at very limited ranges (about 15km max).

@shashair 12 жыл бұрын

Observe @ 2:50 ,3:40, 5:20 You can see thrust vectoring clearly. By the way, great video! May I know which camera you use?

@JishyFishy4106 Жыл бұрын

It is a Su-30MKI, in a different paint. Su-30SM came in 2011-12.

@Zeighent 11 жыл бұрын

The su-30 is still in development, actually Russia and India are in talks to manufactur a new Su-30 with new improvements, guess they will take many things from Su-35BM and improve it

@Mach1Airspace 10 жыл бұрын

Extraordinary plane - for an air show but here's some hard facts: the Dogfight Era is gone, long since replaced with today's Stealth Era. If you don't have it, then hey, you ain't got it. This jet's maneuverability is phenomenal but its modern era fighter capability is no match for cutting edge stealth aircraft and no one even comes close to the level of US stealth technology. Sorry, Ruskies - that's just the way it is.

@cumulusnimbus8717 10 жыл бұрын

Oh yes. While you are totally invisible to the enemy, a red dot will appear on your screen. You will launch a missile and some seconds later the red dot will disappear. Just like those F-22 games you play. Sorry yankees, but reality is a little more complicated than that. Even today, when you fight those great wars against incompetent air forces in the middle east you don't fire until you get visual confirmation, because you just can't identify the dot you see on the screen, when there is a dot.

@Mach1Airspace 10 жыл бұрын

That's what the AWACS and drones are for. Recognizing an enemy 200 miles out. What era data book are you learning from? 1960 dog fighting 101?

@cumulusnimbus8717 10 жыл бұрын

So, you are telling me that if I fire an anti-radiation missile, like the russians have now, to destroy or at least to force the AWACS to turn the radar off, the precious, expensive and "stealthy" f-22 will be blind? I have another question. What do you think is cheaper and more logical? To build a whole fighter around the concept of stealth or to develop a radar able to counter that stealth? For how long do you think the stealth technology will be usefull against advanced, competent air forces? My point is that one technology anulates the other. In the end you can't throw away dogfights.

@Mach1Airspace 10 жыл бұрын

Cumulus Nimbus Russian radiation missiles can't travel ground to air 300 miles distant where AWACS operate at. Every air force on earth is at least 5 years (conservative estimate) behind US GEN 5 stealth. When they catch up, US will be operating at GEN 7. Everyone other than US is just another wannabe in effective St Technology. Last dog fight was during Iraq war 25 years ago when US showed up with GEN 1 and everyone fled to Iran or died. Dogfights? Gone. Face it.

@cumulusnimbus8717 10 жыл бұрын

That missile is air to air. Please, cut that "generation" talk. It's just a mindless Cliché. Propaganda from your DoD and the military industrial complex to take away your tax money. They say they can deliver a product that has no way to be proved. And you still believe it.

@flofunflydive 13 жыл бұрын

wooowww!!! This is what I call "SUPERIORITY". Great fighter aircraft, great pilot, thank you Sukhoi, Thank you Russia!!! ;-)

@Rouhollah74 11 жыл бұрын

I mean what do you think Sukhoi designers should have done with this aircraft so that it could become better? Is RCS really important? Even very Low observable flying objects can be detected by electro-optical radars.

@F22raptor46 11 жыл бұрын

I know, and so the F-22 is an awesome plane!!!

@swordsmanink 10 жыл бұрын

Amazing :)

@oleksiiivanov3703 10 жыл бұрын

)))) Даааа... эй F-там какой-то))) есть чем ответить......)))) особенно на взлете, переворот с разворотом )))))

@dexter9275 Жыл бұрын

❣

@omega4chimp 11 жыл бұрын

Actually Russians are pretty clean precise people I think they can build a lot.

@olivieraero Жыл бұрын

Gooood 😃😃😃🤘🤘🤘🤘👍👍👍👍👍💪💪💪💪

@mauricioalfredo83 12 жыл бұрын

I love Su30MKI "04" Camuflage !!! ...This is Su27 T10M-11 aka Su37 legacy for sure :) canards...tvc...event to T50

@chillistep 11 жыл бұрын

where the heck is the fuel tank on this thing ? it looks so that this thigh doesnt have a fueltank is is running magic :P

@gtamodman122 11 жыл бұрын

No problem, we all have other things to do :) IRST sensors are not really capable of searching for IR emissions because the sky is a vast space and they have no clue where to look.Perhaps in close ranges they can find something, but for longer (read as "combat-efficient) ranges they need something to tell them where to look at. The RQ-170 was most likely hacked, but not detected via IRST.Even visual contact is possible.

@Rouhollah74 11 жыл бұрын

Sorry for replying very late. I'm confused.IRST detects objects that give off infrared radiation.I know it will function much more efficiently if the pilot knows where to look for the target.(for example from the source of a hostile airborne radar emitter.) But it doesn't necessarily require target coordination. Yes, the range is limited for IRST and passive stealth attack ,but I don't think that the Low observable RQ-170 has been intercepted by an IRST system!

@predator1702 4 жыл бұрын

Gravity: you SU30sm? SU30sm: who the fuck are you?

@Rouhollah74 11 жыл бұрын

Any recommendation?

@tht1drnkrussian 12 жыл бұрын

@gtamodman122 no, the su-35 is an improved SU-27, but i see ur point as an improved su-30

@Hudelcu 11 жыл бұрын

Impressive. If I would be the president of my country, I would like to buy some of these. Does Russia sell these only to India?

@F22raptor46 11 жыл бұрын

Actually without TVC the F-22's maneuverability would be like an F-18, but with it it comes close to an Su-35 I know its not as maneuverable but is good enough

@mauricioalfredo83 12 жыл бұрын

@gtamodman122 ...Iam agree whit a lot what U said BUT Su27 T10 its the best layout or fighter chasis Ive ever seen...it can performe cobra whitout TVC nozzles and older engines and avionics...americans are at least 20 years behind whit hinges 1D thrus vectoring

@gtamodman122 11 жыл бұрын

that's why it has tvc.For super agility

@yksniset 11 жыл бұрын

OMG, I was watching the video amazed as hell from the incredibly insane agility of the plane, saying myself "Never seen something like that before. Only thing that is missing is the ability to fly backwards." and then 1:56 came. Russians you rule! :-))

@emadjoseph2803 2 жыл бұрын

It can fly backward

@emadjoseph2803 2 жыл бұрын

And inverted backwards

@gtamodman122 12 жыл бұрын

I wish Sukhoi had made it even better...but now this poor plane (that could have been a supermaneuverable strike eagle) suffers from lack of modern electronics and a HUGE RCS.

@j.rudolf 4 жыл бұрын

👍👍👍👍👍👍👍🇷🇺

@gtamodman122 11 жыл бұрын

I think that they should have invested in electronics, weapons and low observability.RCS is still an extremely important factor, because EO sensors cannot scan for infrared sources on their own.They are slaved to the radar.In order to lock onto a target with an EO sensor (e.g. an IRST) you need to find that target first with your radar, or another plane should tell your radar where the target is.

@gtamodman122 12 жыл бұрын

@popmerde feel free to say it, as long as you're not going to spam your rage on me.It probably will matter,because I'm not American, I live on the other side of the planet, hehe.What I'm saying is that it's a good plane, but it has its disadvantages.Firstly, look at its size.We're talking about an enormous RCS (I've read articles getting it as high as 12m2 (squared).Secondly, despite the fact that it has been heavily modernized, some importance should have been given to the strike role too.

@mauricioalfredo83 12 жыл бұрын

anyone know 5:17 manouver name???

@typhoonzsmk 11 жыл бұрын

drift!

@gtamodman122 11 жыл бұрын

What do you mean?

@changmingjen 13 жыл бұрын

Great video!

@enfantdeDieu 11 жыл бұрын

GREAT ! God bless Russia ! PAX +

@user-yy1rs3df3q 12 жыл бұрын

Does Sukhoi take PayPal???????

@gocristi7270 6 жыл бұрын

they take bottles of vodka

@LaVadoRos1 12 жыл бұрын

This is a free- flying cyborg! Pilot can't make this.))))

@gtamodman122 12 жыл бұрын

@tht1drnkrussian I consider it an improved single-seat Su-30.For me, it's not the plane of the year.I'm waiting for the PAK-FA to see if the Russians make their breakthrough in the aircraft market.

@George_1Cross 2 жыл бұрын

SUKHOI RULES ALWAYS.

@williamhughes7091 10 жыл бұрын

Their economy is booming, making these?

@trommelbiel 11 жыл бұрын

Russian is underrated but they are the best.

@tht1drnkrussian 12 жыл бұрын

@gtamodman122 sukhoi DID make something better: SU-35BM

@1968drale 13 жыл бұрын

RUSSIA No.1 :-)

@7Neanderthal7 11 жыл бұрын

so should Australia

@popmerde 12 жыл бұрын

@gtamodman122 I wasnt going to insult you or anything, im not like that. Im just telling you this is the future. Yes it is big but you saw it with your own eyes, no american aircraft can do this, not even the raptor.