You can not call that provocation like on a school yard between a bully and the bullied we are talking about a country and its people, please stop doing ridiculous comparisons!

I couldn’t have said this better! She definitely made me proud to hear the truth

💯 we need more logical, rational, respectable news commentary from Kim and others… rather than the fear mongering propaganda of legacy and mainstream media.

Absolutely!!!!

with support too

She states opinions as facts, which I dont like. The isolationist perspective is refreshing, though, considering every media is warmongering right now. It's good to have balance.

Comrade Iversen is an embarrassment.

We must DECENTRALIZE FEDERAL POWER!!! Vote your values not your feelings or fears! Decentralize power!

@Pickin Dim if there are multiple truths that contradict eachother, then they arent truths, they are opinions. An example is her very passionate prediction that Putin stops in the Ukraine. It strikes a very uncomfortable chord with me, and clearly Robbie abd Ryan, because it sounds like she is justifying Putins move and guaranteeing that this is nothing more than saber rattling. As Robbie points out, there is a lot of reason to be skeptical.

On this topic the media narratives are right and Kim is wrong.

Yeah, may God bless Kim. You do need God's blessing to restore the democracy and free speech in the USA. This government will do anything filthy to protect it's hegemony. If the majority of the populace support falsehood, it doesn't matter which party is dominant, nothing will change.

Bravo! The truth is bitter.

NO she is NOT.. she is spewing Russian Propoganda.. Good Lord. Het of her wagon.. she is a nutcase

Her and Tucker

Facts

Yes, Kim is excellent. I gave her a little more to consider - hopefully they read these comments! But yes, she is about as good as they get and she is VERY good.

EXCEPT ON PRESIDENT TRUMP

I love Kim Eversen.

USAF myself (end of Cold War), Khrushchev (the Premier at the time), moved the missiles into Cuba post Bay of Pigs, in order to "defend" Cuba. JFK "supposedly" had ordered the Jupiter missiles out of Turkey (the delay may have been NATO). JFK and Khrushchev finally agreed to move the missiles, but we only moved ours 6 month later, and would not admit that it was a quid pro quo. From the Cuban Missile crisis, I hope that there are cooler heads prevailing, and that they are using back channels

Well that makes perfect sense. That was too easy. Doubt we hear it on cnn. Thanks

I had never heard this before. History has always made it seem like this was a Soviet provocation. Thanks for the knowledge.

@@dsgriffin3736 We are coming up on the 60th Anniversary of the Cuban Missile Crisis, I hope there is something on it.

YOU CLEARLY ARE NOT A VETERAN, NUKES WERE ALREADY IN TURKEY, AND THIS IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT, NO NUKES/SOLDIERS ARE DEPLOYED IN NATO COUNTRIES EXCEPT GERMANY (WW2 TREATY) OR UNLESS A NATO ALLY IS THREATENED

Kim is brilliant I agree, she has fast become one of my favourites as well…but pls do check out Richard Medhurst as well…his my number 1 guy for truth 👍🏻 and possibly Gonzalo Lira (that’s if you don’t mind his occasional swearing) 🙈

CNN should be ashamed of themselves ! They don't know what Journalism is ! They are just Zelensky's PR Firm !

@Lilman Yellow And nincompoops.

And are shallow even by Beltway consensus standards.

Ryan is a shill for the establishment. The Hill is worthless. Kim is their only good journalist. She should leave the Hill and let it die as it should have when Saagar and Krystal left

@@JJEarls147 have you watched those 2 lately? As bad as Ryan and Robbie anymore. Kim feels like all that’s left.

@@trevorkuhlman8179 Yes, you're right. I just unsubscribed from Saagar and Krystal.

The other two guys know nothing.. Mainly the skinny one have almost zero knowledge about the situation.

The show needs to be renamed "Kim and the Two Clowns Show"

If not for Kim, i have no interest of watching the two lame uninformed talking heads hosts,

@@norseman9367 this is the most accurate summary of the show - just get rid of the other two already 🤬

Russia has no interest of expansion.

It all money and power.

whole truth loving people in the world knows the truth bro. Chill. They cant hide the truth evenif they forcefeed western propoganda 24x7 to us.

Are you mentally ill Anastasia? How did you have no other reason? There was zero threat for russia

She's the best

Kim is an idiot, as I pointed out in another comment, the reason why nato is expanding is not because the western powers wanted to expand many European countries were extremely against it, its eastern Europe that wants to join. Russia has militarely harassed every single one of its neighbours, and the reason why they don't want people in NATO is because they want to be able to continue their military action, occupation, land theft, destruction of other countries and absorption as vasal states, ala belarus, chechen, crimea etc etc. Russian neighbours like Finland have been repeatedly threatened. Russia should be restrained, they can't just invade whatever country they want claiming to annul their sovereignty. And that includes USA imperalism btw, the wars are making the world less stable and worse off.

Actually she one of few Critical thinkers in media.. I’m always very impressed with her work

@@rightwingersexposed8800 how would you propose we restrain Russia? Through economic sanctions? Military force? Another method I'm not seeing? IMO, I only see American military conflict with Russia ending in one way, with nukes flying. I don't doubt for a second that Putin would do this.

@@normanduceswild22n34 i said on Rising...it's right there in front of you friend.. i know there are other critical thinkers out there... And there are some what used to be critical thinkers and are now just poop brains.. like Kyle Kulinski... 😂

EXACTLY! 💯

Sorry Kim- nations have the right to make autonomous decisions. It's not an excuse for war. You were wrong. Live with it

totally agree...its embarrassing.

He cant see beyond the usual left right BS

He said "don't invade your neighbors" She asked him "what's a solution you would accept" He repeated his previous statement as if an answer Thanks for the Non answer Robbie! You're clueless.

Robbie got insulted when she brought up neocons. He is one. The other guy... not even worth talking about.

@@DIRTYdeeds613 110%

you're never gonna hear this on CNN, MSNBC, or Fox News. The Hill is the only mainstream media that allows some truth to slip in, but we all know what they did to Krystal and Saagar... Kim is the only thing keeping the hill together

Hi, I'm really not at all surprised, it's more or less exactly the same here in Britain. Even our own BBC is now biased and corrupted by the far left and spews out, unashamedly, totally biased misinformation from around the world. And not giving it's viewers a true picture of what is happening... especially with regards of the sad plight of the people of Ukraine. Good luck/ and news to you.

No there is no hope. Kim has a miniscule about of people watching her and her viewpoint.

@@dipp1511 Fox News on tucker had basically the same message. The left called him a kremlin sympathizer. 😒

Yes, it’s American media, but unfortunately a very minor player. When we hear this on CNN or NBC, then we can celebrate. Don’t get me wrong, I love Hilltv and I’m in total support of them. Kim is the best!

Try redacted, they are good.

Typical day at the Hill

I don't think Kim Iversen is very smart.

Smart for a puppet.

@@havable "Puppet". She's just speaking facts man, how does that equal being a puppet.. smh

@@maxxpup41 To each their own, many of us do.

@@Danneman92 " "Puppet". She's just speaking facts man, how does that equal being a puppet" She's so one-sided on this she can only be a puppet of Emperor Putin. Putin annexed Crimea which is why Ukraine wanted to join NATO. NATO didn't ask Ukraine to join. They resisted the idea. But acc'd to Kim, NATO is at fault for Putin bombing grade schools, nuclear plants, hospitals, and holocaust memorials.

nice to know the blame America first party is still alive and well....

You're right Kim.

She's telling a very uncomfortable truth about American meddling.

@@juanmmm979 America can be a great country to lead the world but it has to lead in a lawful and just manner. Its action can have devastating consequences to lives of people around the world. We need to see ourselves as caring human being first before any other interest. We can't stay silence just because we are American.

It’s very disheartening when you finally discover that that white Knight armor you’re wearing is a storm trooper uniform, the “rebels” you are fighting are freedom fighters, and your beloved homeland is the Evil Empire.

Crying for Putin and telling Ukraine to surrender and get over it?! You love that? I think it’s gross.

@@lesaamoore Then go fight in Ukraine - They need the help

Comrade Iversen is an embarrassment.

So true!

Absolutely agree

Me toooo, she is the best of the three, she must go Solo

Kim is quite on point lately but back then on her channel, first 1/2 of her show is ok then 2nd 1/2 she gone completely off the rail.....

I only watch it when she's on.

Why pay ta.xes?.... stop funding those who seek to control you....Terr.or.ists....... Look at your govern..m.ent... Power to the people. Only when we realise and become awakened to the fact that we are all suffering at the hands of the same people will we be able to begin to resolve our issues. Doctors are supposed to evaluate each patient as an individual. There is no mass solution to any problem, well some guy in the 1930's thought there was, but we all know how that went. Fools just gonna keep trusting the government until their pronouns are was/were..... 🤪🤒😵☠ Peace, power and freedom to all.

Comrade Iversen is an embarrassment.

@@joeterzio7175 Really, you can't see the security concerns Russia has that Kim explains? What do you think the US would do if Russia backed an anti-US coup in Mexico and then put missiles near the US border? Not to mention NATO expansion for the past 30 years.

@@joeterzio7175 Smooth brain take

We must DECENTRALIZE FEDERAL POWER!!! Vote your values not your feelings or fears! Decentralize power!

You're proud of your sycophancy? After admitting her abject incompetence - 0:05 "Many of us did not believe Russia was going to invade Ukraine" - Iversen goes on to offer her analysis nevertheless: the whole invasion is NATO's and the Americans' fault. In fact the opposite is obviously true: had NATO extended membership to Ukraine - which it refused to do! - it is highly unlikely that Russia would have invaded. Moreover, every serious analyst knows that Russia's annexation of Crimea and de facto occupation via proxies of Donbass had absolutely nothing to do with fear of NATO, except again in the negative sense that Putin was able to act with impunity precisely because there was no NATO protection. Zelensky also stated before the invasion he was willing to agree not to seek NATO membership. The whole NATO issue was merely a pretext of Putin. Like other Putin stooges on YT, Iversen completely ignores Putin's speech, where he candidly states Ukraine has no right to exist, was always part of Russia historically, that Ukrainians and Russians are one people, and that its present independence is a historical wrong. Serious analysts, as opposed to ignorant "influencers" telling their wokey audiences what they want to hear, have observed that aside from pure covetousness, what Putin really finds intolerable is Ukraine enjoying a flourishing democracy moving closer to the EU, right in the heart of the old Soviet/Russian empire. It is hard to maintain despotic rule when a young generation of Russians can see their cousins enjoying the benefits of a modern European democracy. But it's an interesting phenomenon that one can attract many followers in the west not by knowing anything but by being a lackey of a foreign despot crushing a sovereign nation.

On this issue she has FAR outshined Saagar and Krystal. Krystal in particular is a very dim bulb.

@@ls6097add Robbie to that list as well. I have always appreciated the perspective he bought to the show for our shared libertarian values, however, for advocating "No nations should invade their neighbors if they share a border", please just shut up Robbie and let the smart lady make the obvious case. Why do I say that? As an Indian--whose country borders a nuclear armed fundamentalist nation, which has not signed up to the "No First Use Policy", who incidentally also happens to be an ally of the USA and yet safely harbored their public enemy number-1 Osama Bin Laden for the whole part of a decade since 9/11--I would say to Robbie, shut up and just keep scowling, before you open you mouth and advocate "No nations should invade their neighbors if they share a border", let me see him say the same thing when Mexico turns agnostic and amasses nuclear weapons on the Southern border. He has no idea what kind of an existential threat that is to live under, and to suggest anything otherwise for Russia's reaction, is just plain hypocrisy. Sometimes it is better to remain silent and appear intelligent than open your mouth and remove any doubts of it.

@@ashok.vardhan.g Must be the first time I am listening to a full segment from the Hill since Krystal and Saagar left, and my word, after Robbie opened his mouth, the first thing I thought was, "How dumb is he?" As for your fellow nuclear neighbors, think it does not help having the Bhutto clan taken out ushering in more hard-line characters. The political environment over there reads like a Shakespearean tragedy.

@@sheilamacdougal4874 You are so lost...

She’s 💯 on Point! She showed and eloquently stated facts.

After admitting her abject incompetence - 0:05 "Many of us did not believe Russia was going to invade Ukraine" - Iversen goes on to offer her analysis nevertheless: the whole invasion is NATO's and the Americans' fault. In fact the opposite is obviously true: had NATO extended membership to Ukraine - which it refused to do! - it is highly unlikely that Russia would have invaded. Moreover, every serious analyst knows that Russia's annexation of Crimea and de facto occupation via proxies of Donbass had absolutely nothing to do with fear of NATO, except again in the negative sense that Putin was able to act with impunity precisely because there was no NATO protection. Zelensky also stated before the invasion he was willing to agree not to seek NATO membership. The whole NATO issue was merely a pretext of Putin. Like other Putin stooges on YT, Iversen completely ignores Putin's speech, where he candidly states Ukraine has no right to exist, was always part of Russia historically, that Ukrainians and Russians are one people, and that its present independence is a historical wrong. Serious analysts, as opposed to ignorant "influencers" telling their wokey audiences what they want to hear, have observed that aside from pure covetousness, what Putin really finds intolerable is Ukraine enjoying a flourishing democracy moving closer to the EU, right in the heart of the old Soviet/Russian empire. It is hard to maintain despotic rule when a young generation of Russians can see their cousins enjoying the benefits of a modern European democracy. But it's an interesting phenomenon that one can attract many followers in the west not by knowing anything but by being a lackey of a foreign despot crushing a sovereign nation.

@@sheilamacdougal4874 nato would violate its own rules if they accepted Ukraine. Remember; no country can join nato if they have territorial disputes. Ukraine have territorial disputes, one with Moldova in the west and one with Russia in the east. Georgia also has territorial disputes therefore cannot join Nato. Unless Nato don't care about its own rules.

@@bellbells872 USSR wasn't destroyed economically by USA, contrary to the popular belief. To list all the factors contributing to that would be a long essay in this thread that probably no one will read. Even now its not USA that is destroying Russia's economy (that remains to be seen. Not everything is what it seems) but a combination of many countries, West leading the charge. If these other countries didn't follow US lead in these sanctions, nothing would have happened to Russia. As I said, that remain to be seen. Russia has probably planed this long ago. Perhaps together with China,Indian,Iran and other Asian countries, they'd probably ditch us dollar for good and have their own swift system. Certainly this economic war that the west declared on Russia will push this narrative faster in Asia and Africa for that matter. Just because Russia is the aggressor in here, it doesn't mean that other countries in these two continents see thing the way we see it. To them, a bully is fighting another bully on unfair level playing field. Russia invaded Ukraine and broke the international treaties. USA invaded Iraq and broke the international treaties. How come one is being punished economically and the other getting away with it, they'd think!! Don't think that USA plan is going to work this time around.

@@vinlondon8904 Russia literaly invaded Urkaine in 2014 and annexed its territory illegally

I second that 👋🏼

Not everything that Kim says is correct do your own research

Listening to her rationalize Putin's invasion is disgusting. She was terrible here and I lost what what little respect I had for her.

@@viennabird9492 which one isn't correct?

@@adilzade3022 nonsense. Anyone can go back and listen to Putin's speeches on the matter. Nato was just one of many points he made and not even the main one. Kim is phishing for a narrative to fit her agenda and too many of you fall for it

This lady is the most one sided political fraud I think I’ve ever seen 😂

@@BobRoss-wm3lc .... because she is the complete opposite from your political POV? Then, what are you? A greater political fraud because you are accusing someone without reason.

@@BobRoss-wm3lc That's a harsh judgment. Why do you say this? Could you please provide your reasons.

@@adamiskandar5107 nailed it

KIM is correct 100%.

Yes. Ryan grim is a puppet and a boring one at that. Kim knows her stuff and isn’t afraid to speak her mind.

I appreciate having the other voices, I don't want only one side of a discussion, there is a time and place for that but we should also be seeking to understand. Ryan is naive to the point of handicap. "Don't invade" well duh but after 25 years of not invading and getting outplayed by NATO in a country that is on the border you have to eventually either a) play the hand you have been given or b) roll over to the country outpositioning you. What would the US do if Canada and Mexico suddenly allied with Russia? Roll over and just say "hey Russia, we trust you, its all good". No, they wouldn't and they would be right not to trust them. So they would have to respond in some way, and they should. I don't want anyone to die in Ukraine. Not Urainians and not Russians. I don't want Russia to invade Ukraine. So why not hold peace treaties so that they can sign a peace deal to make Ukraine independent and a buffer between NATO and Russia?

After admitting her abject incompetence - 0:05 "Many of us did not believe Russia was going to invade Ukraine" - Iversen goes on to offer her analysis nevertheless: the whole invasion is NATO's and the Americans' fault. In fact the opposite is obviously true: had NATO extended membership to Ukraine - which it refused to do! - it is highly unlikely that Russia would have invaded. Moreover, every serious analyst knows that Russia's annexation of Crimea and de facto occupation via proxies of Donbass had absolutely nothing to do with fear of NATO, except again in the negative sense that Putin was able to act with impunity precisely because there was no NATO protection. Zelensky also stated before the invasion he was willing to agree not to seek NATO membership. The whole NATO issue was merely a pretext of Putin. Like other Putin stooges on YT, Iversen completely ignores Putin's speech, where he candidly states Ukraine has no right to exist, was always part of Russia historically, that Ukrainians and Russians are one people, and that its present independence is a historical wrong. Serious analysts, as opposed to ignorant "influencers" telling their wokey audiences what they want to hear, have observed that aside from pure covetousness, what Putin really finds intolerable is Ukraine enjoying a flourishing democracy moving closer to the EU, right in the heart of the old Soviet/Russian empire. It is hard to maintain despotic rule when a young generation of Russians can see their cousins enjoying the benefits of a modern European democracy. But it's an interesting phenomenon that one can attract many followers in the west not by knowing anything but by being a lackey of a foreign despot crushing a sovereign nation.

Its not

@@itakarerio2821 And you are a ridiculous infant.

I wish they'd use her more or change the time to later so she can participate more, she's the best one by far!!

Send her to North Korea. She'd love it there.

Kim for US senate! Seriously, Kim, you are the voice of so many! Please clone yourself 1000 times! :)

@@bidhrohi12 🤣🤣🤣 but no she really balances the show.

@@bidhrohi12 😂 😂😂 thanks for the laugh

United Nations of Hypocrisy, “…amongst (us) ordinary, worldwide, citizens.” If you think about it, Why don’t we ever see All Media Platforms getting passionately worked-up during the civil wars brewing for years in foreign countries, (or currently in America), until it’s “time for War!” Then suddenly it’s myopic-persuasion in the name of the “moral high ground”. And another observation in regards to the sudden leaping to the “moral high ground” - Was there, or was there not - Recently - A large group of the world’s population which were passionately willing to die for something noble - Something which should never have been tolerated…? W.H.O. could those innocent victims have been!? 🤔🤫 Then today, America’s Lindsay Graham spoke. His words: “…The rule of law. I want to live in a world where the rule of law trumps the rule of guns…. This is a defining moment, I think, for the rule of law… For the last twenty years, plus… has maintained power by imprisoning… opponents… The state has collapsed… puppet(s)… The courts have been neutered…” My fellow human beings, What other countries do these word’s reflect.? What other countries resemble this State-of-Being? The enemy? The Hero? These are the euphemistic myths of our time. Peace above all, No excuses, Fellow Humans. Let's help Kim , help us all with her voice and platform.

Except she does not know what she is talking about when it comes to Russia and Putin.

@@fredrikschei1419 enlighten us...

I DONT know why they’re dismissing that point. We know that what Putin is doing is wrong, but their stubbornness has led to him reacting the way he’s reacting - poking and poking for 30 yearssssssss🤦🏿‍♀️

@@fredrikschei1419 Putin ELDERS APPROVE of his actions - it’s beyond Putin

Absolutely 💯

No "provocation" can justify the violence and death the Ukrainians are experiencing.

Ukraine is an independent nation that wants to join NATO, how is that the fault of the west? How is that provocation. And since they are not yet part of NATO, NATO would not be bound to engage militarily. I usually agree with Kim, but not in this one.

That is not provocation when most of the country of Ukraine wants to be more with EU and NATO than Russia. Can Ukraine choose their own path? Kim misses that point. Putin actually wants a puppet there in Ukraine, like they have in Belarus and Moldova. Kim is gets some things right here, but is actually pretty embarrassing just trying to be contranian.

@@kham1163 Kim is delusional on this one. Makes absolutely ZERO sense what she is saying.

Kim Iveren is Russian

@@elviss6783 , why ??...🤣just because she speaks with reason and logic instead of fake emotions?... hmmm🤔 -- and by the way, her name is Iversen, (which doesn't sound Russian at all), not "iveren" 😛

Unlike these two other guys!

God help us if continue on this path. The interview is at point and factful. Europeans know this and at the end, they will not follow.

Except the guy on the right screen, very annoying. He seems more interested in putting blamed on Putin than holding US/NATO accountable for leading to this war.

all of these people seem to forget that Ukraine's history with russia is horrible. millions were starved by russia.

@X D more like russians that moved into ukraine 90 years ago are at war with ukraine. ukraine has very good reasons for never trusting russians.

@X D not civil war, russian invasion

My all-time favorite quote ... Former govt employee Phil Schneider supposedly had first-hand knowledge of the military's use of alien technology and also claimed to have direct interactions with aliens ... When asked what aliens thought of human beings, he said: " ... they view us as being less than morons" ...

After admitting her abject incompetence - 0:05 "Many of us did not believe Russia was going to invade Ukraine" - Iversen goes on to offer her analysis nevertheless: the whole invasion is NATO's and the Americans' fault. In fact the opposite is obviously true: had NATO extended membership to Ukraine - which it refused to do! - it is highly unlikely that Russia would have invaded. Moreover, every serious analyst knows that Russia's annexation of Crimea and de facto occupation via proxies of Donbass had absolutely nothing to do with fear of NATO, except again in the negative sense that Putin was able to act with impunity precisely because there was no NATO protection. Zelensky also stated before the invasion he was willing to agree not to seek NATO membership. The whole NATO issue was merely a pretext of Putin. Like other Putin stooges on YT, Iversen completely ignores Putin's speech, where he candidly states Ukraine has no right to exist, was always part of Russia historically, that Ukrainians and Russians are one people, and that its present independence is a historical wrong. Serious analysts, as opposed to ignorant "influencers" telling their wokey audiences what they want to hear, have observed that aside from pure covetousness, what Putin really finds intolerable is Ukraine enjoying a flourishing democracy moving closer to the EU, right in the heart of the old Soviet/Russian empire. It is hard to maintain despotic rule when a young generation of Russians can see their cousins enjoying the benefits of a modern European democracy. But it's an interesting phenomenon that one can attract many followers in the west not by knowing anything but by being a lackey of a foreign despot crushing a sovereign nation.

Facts redststeannie

Absolutely true. As a first-time listener, I would have clicked away, but Kim saved the day. I'll be back.

@@lesliethomas7234 I subbed because of her

Hear Hear 👏👏

More like Kim is the ONLY one worth watching on this channel.

My all-time favorite quote ... Former govt employee Phil Schneider supposedly had first-hand knowledge of the military's use of alien technology and also claimed to have direct interactions with aliens ... When asked what aliens thought of human beings, he said: " ... they view us as being less than morons" ...

We constantly are meddling in other countries business moving bases at every countries borders with missles aimed at them if they don't do as we say we threaten them

Robby is not a libertarian Please get a real libertarian on this show

After admitting her abject incompetence - 0:05 "Many of us did not believe Russia was going to invade Ukraine" - Iversen goes on to offer her analysis nevertheless: the whole invasion is NATO's and the Americans' fault. In fact the opposite is obviously true: had NATO extended membership to Ukraine - which it refused to do! - it is highly unlikely that Russia would have invaded. Moreover, every serious analyst knows that Russia's annexation of Crimea and de facto occupation via proxies of Donbass had absolutely nothing to do with fear of NATO, except again in the negative sense that Putin was able to act with impunity precisely because there was no NATO protection. Zelensky also stated before the invasion he was willing to agree not to seek NATO membership. The whole NATO issue was merely a pretext of Putin. Like other Putin stooges on YT, Iversen completely ignores Putin's speech, where he candidly states Ukraine has no right to exist, was always part of Russia historically, that Ukrainians and Russians are one people, and that its present independence is a historical wrong. Serious analysts, as opposed to ignorant "influencers" telling their wokey audiences what they want to hear, have observed that aside from pure covetousness, what Putin really finds intolerable is Ukraine enjoying a flourishing democracy moving closer to the EU, right in the heart of the old Soviet/Russian empire. It is hard to maintain despotic rule when a young generation of Russians can see their cousins enjoying the benefits of a modern European democracy. But it's an interesting phenomenon that one can attract many followers in the west not by knowing anything but by being a lackey of a foreign despot crushing a sovereign nation.

@@sheilamacdougal4874 believing something has nothing to do with reality / the fact unfortunately! President Vladimir Putin been giving a lot of warning 🗣️🎤🗣️and nobody pay attention especially, people in high positions!

@@sheilamacdougal4874 Good post. Putin owns this disaster and any narrative, as proposed by Kim Iversen, draws attention away from this fundamental fact.

In that, you are correct!

After admitting her abject incompetence - 0:05 "Many of us did not believe Russia was going to invade Ukraine" - Iversen goes on to offer her analysis nevertheless: the whole invasion is NATO's and the Americans' fault. In fact the opposite is obviously true: had NATO extended membership to Ukraine - which it refused to do! - it is highly unlikely that Russia would have invaded. Moreover, every serious analyst knows that Russia's annexation of Crimea and de facto occupation via proxies of Donbass had absolutely nothing to do with fear of NATO, except again in the negative sense that Putin was able to act with impunity precisely because there was no NATO protection. Zelensky also stated before the invasion he was willing to agree not to seek NATO membership. The whole NATO issue was merely a pretext of Putin. Like other Putin stooges on YT, Iversen completely ignores Putin's speech, where he candidly states Ukraine has no right to exist, was always part of Russia historically, that Ukrainians and Russians are one people, and that its present independence is a historical wrong. Serious analysts, as opposed to ignorant "influencers" telling their wokey audiences what they want to hear, have observed that aside from pure covetousness, what Putin really finds intolerable is Ukraine enjoying a flourishing democracy moving closer to the EU, right in the heart of the old Soviet/Russian empire. It is hard to maintain despotic rule when a young generation of Russians can see their cousins enjoying the benefits of a modern European democracy. But it's an interesting phenomenon that one can attract many followers in the west not by knowing anything but by being a lackey of a foreign despot crushing a sovereign nation.

Of course, Kim is absolutely right. This incursion is fully justified. Would the USA tolerate Russian missiles in Tijuana? "The uniqueness of what is happening now in Ukraine in an interview with political scientist Sergey Karnaukhov was explained the day before by military-political expert Yakov Kedmi, noting that the effect of surprise is still working. What and how Russia did in Ukraine surprised and discouraged the whole world. Especially Kiev's Western partners. They used to shout: "Russia will enter Ukraine tomorrow." Okay, we're in, and now what? What has changed? They don't know what has changed. They don't understand what Russia will do next. This is the main uniqueness of the entire special operation. Unprecedented mobility, jewelry precision and increased attention to the safety of civilians - no one has seen this before." Anyone who urges Ukraine to keep fighting has blood on their hands. Biden wants to prolong this "war" as long as possible.

Putil is destroying D.S neo-Nazis in Ukraine, globalists are panicking.

*_If it were of my concern I'd rather prefer_** Kim is not to be associated 'news-politically' with a younger hosting i.d.i.o.t. that inteferes at 11-16th minute. Hearing His unHinged & deranged declarations just KILLS the joy of listening to a brilliant 30-years-long-about dissertation.*

After admitting her abject incompetence - 0:05 "Many of us did not believe Russia was going to invade Ukraine" - Iversen goes on to offer her analysis nevertheless: the whole invasion is NATO's and the Americans' fault. In fact the opposite is obviously true: had NATO extended membership to Ukraine - which it refused to do! - it is highly unlikely that Russia would have invaded. Moreover, every serious analyst knows that Russia's annexation of Crimea and de facto occupation via proxies of Donbass had absolutely nothing to do with fear of NATO, except again in the negative sense that Putin was able to act with impunity precisely because there was no NATO protection. Zelensky also stated before the invasion he was willing to agree not to seek NATO membership. The whole NATO issue was merely a pretext of Putin. Like other Putin stooges on YT, Iversen completely ignores Putin's speech, where he candidly states Ukraine has no right to exist, was always part of Russia historically, that Ukrainians and Russians are one people, and that its present independence is a historical wrong. Serious analysts, as opposed to ignorant "influencers" telling their wokey audiences what they want to hear, have observed that aside from pure covetousness, what Putin really finds intolerable is Ukraine enjoying a flourishing democracy moving closer to the EU, right in the heart of the old Soviet/Russian empire. It is hard to maintain despotic rule when a young generation of Russians can see their cousins enjoying the benefits of a modern European democracy. But it's an interesting phenomenon that one can attract many followers in the west not by knowing anything but by being a lackey of a foreign despot crushing a sovereign nation.

No talk of Oil and Gas which is a major part of this war

​@@sheilamacdougal4874 - Once Texas had been too *_a sovereign nation_* before it got *_crushed by a foreign despot_* You double-faced cowardly Pentagon & Transnational Free Invading Corps ...pusher & dealer. Ukraine is a made of 5 different pieces Soviet State bungled by bolshevik leaders - was always run by the Dzhevvs-only Party's High Ranking Nomenklatur, it still is. Those like Mr. Turchinov & others whose names are not to be mentioned on the news. The interim President Turchinov launched the invasion of Donbass in early April of 2014. _- Do you know other acronym then N@T0 ? ... Boring, it should have been disbanded on February the 7th, 1992 in Maastricht._ *Well, now they will have the chance to be burned alive & never be buried* as the rest of humanity.* ... It concerns you too, birdie Sheila

YES! I feel the same

Lol I said this yesterday. There’s like a 1% difference between Ryan and msm and that’s me giving him credit.

That's not what "Amurica" exceptionalism means....swing and a miss.

Hi Putin

Simply beautiful... Well said...lol

That would be awesome, but would she end up like JFK? Sad that speaking truth endangers those that speak it.

@@lachicarivers51demilo52 it would end up like Trump. Youd never hear her thoughtful explanations bc some executive assistant would claim she was secretly a spy for Putin. 4 years would be spent debating if she's a spy. The country would be effectively managed and nobody would notice.

Both parties are too corrupt and evil to accept a truth-teller. Look how the Dems slandered Tulsi.

Or let's stop nominating pundits to run things.

@@ninja0406 How can you compare Kim to Trump. Trump is the Capitalist's idea of control in government while Kim is an Idealist showing real concern for the common people. Unless she backs down and gives in to the 'deep state', she's more likely to follow JFK's path. Or are you saying that whoever the American president does not matter, as things will never change?

So we're doing a global CRT thing then?

She was positively emotional and I have to confess I was really liking what she was saying.

lol you and kim think Ukraine would be better if they were under Russia? she has some points but the issue is this premise that magically if the west had not helped them then Russia would have just left them alone? ... like kim in general but her takes on Ukraine are simplistic, she acts like there's some scenario where Ukraine would just be a neutral entity left alone by Russia. I have no interest in defending all of the western policies but the idea that if the west played the right cards then Ukraine could be a neutral country with no Russian interference is just not realistic

@@kheldaryt And why not? If there's no provocation there's no reaction. Russia wouldn't have escalated as they are doing now, they would've taken a different route.

Yes, yes and YES! There are a few that have the same views as Kim such as: Glen Greenwald, Aaron Mate, and Jimmy Dore while everyone else seems to want to have WWIII with Russia which will include China, Iran, India and Saudi Arabia on their side if we let this happen. Now we have a chance to ramp down our emotions and let cooler heads prevail, but if we continue it will be hard to put the genie back in the bottle.

Don't forget about Afghanistan and destroying Libya once the most prosperous nation on the African continent.

The list is very very long sadly.

Sport? It had nothing to do with Saddam?

What a great observation!

wheres your "moral clarity"??!!

I wouldn't watch it without her

Kim is a Putin apologist. She should be working for RT: Russia Today if you ask me.

@@aerialhorizonrc7827 She did not apologize for Putin. She explained the plain fact of the role of a buffer state, a notion sadly overlooked these days in American education, apparently. Emphasizing human rights at the expense of human realities results in death in Ukraine.

Comrade Iversen is an embarrassment.

Same.

@@joeterzio7175 Are you 5 yrs old?

Kim is much better than Krystal & Saagar She’s the true independent voice in all of this.

We need to decentralize federal power Vote your values not your fears of the red or the blue Vote anything and anyone that helps decentralize power AWAY from federal bureaucrats and monopolists

Exactly

We would have shown much less restraint than Russia for sure. We were about to get into a hot war for the Cuban missiles crisis and Cuba is not even on our border like Ukraine is to Russia.

Ukraine already had Soviet Nukes. They gave them up in 1994 in exchange for American aid and a Russian guarantee of sovereignty which Putin violated on 2014 and is violating again today, "USA Citizen" or Russian Bot.

@@thomashogan9196 violated in 2014? The Minsk act was signed in 2014... Hmmm. The US has done nothing but ravage any territory it can over the years when there is a reward to that action which more times than not is financially motivated. I took an oath to my nation in the 90s. Had I known then what I know now there is no way in Hades I would have walked into a recruiters office period. It is okay for NATO to overtake nations yet when someone else does it it is a no fly zone. Okay. Weapons of mass destruction that never existed, etc. That was a power play to destabilize the middle east. That results in incresed DOD funding which goes to the private sector via defense contracts and ultimately kickbacks. I have a close buddy who retired from the Pentagon. He flat out said it wasn't a matter of the intel being wrong. There was no intel. They just sold that excuse to the people. Eventually people will wake up or be reduced to ash in the long run. Oh well. I have my popcorn waiting for the bonfire. Ukraine is one of the most corrupt places on planet earth as far as the government is concerned. ...almost rivalling the backed up toilet known as Cap Hill.

@@rivercitymetaldetecting9854 "After the annexation of Crimea by Russia in 2014, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK,and US] stated that Russian involvement was a breach of its Budapest Memorandum obligations to Ukraine which had been transmitted to the United Nations under the signature of Sergey Lavrov and others, and in violation of Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity." The Budapest Accords under which Ukraine surrendered 1200 nuclear weapons in exchange for the US and Russia guarantees of peace and security were signed by President Wm. Clinton and President Boris Yeltsin on January 14, 1994 . People so ignorant should not be voting.

After admitting her abject incompetence - 0:05 "Many of us did not believe Russia was going to invade Ukraine" - Iversen goes on to offer her analysis nevertheless: the whole invasion is NATO's and the Americans' fault. In fact the opposite is obviously true: had NATO extended membership to Ukraine - which it refused to do! - it is highly unlikely that Russia would have invaded. Moreover, every serious analyst knows that Russia's annexation of Crimea and de facto occupation via proxies of Donbass had absolutely nothing to do with fear of NATO, except again in the negative sense that Putin was able to act with impunity precisely because there was no NATO protection. Zelensky also stated before the invasion he was willing to agree not to seek NATO membership. The whole NATO issue was merely a pretext of Putin. Like other Putin stooges on YT, Iversen completely ignores Putin's speech, where he candidly states Ukraine has no right to exist, was always part of Russia historically, that Ukrainians and Russians are one people, and that its present independence is a historical wrong. Serious analysts, as opposed to ignorant "influencers" telling their wokey audiences what they want to hear, have observed that aside from pure covetousness, what Putin really finds intolerable is Ukraine enjoying a flourishing democracy moving closer to the EU, right in the heart of the old Soviet/Russian empire. It is hard to maintain despotic rule when a young generation of Russians can see their cousins enjoying the benefits of a modern European democracy. But it's an interesting phenomenon that one can attract many followers in the west not by knowing anything but by being a lackey of a foreign despot crushing a sovereign nation.

@@sheilamacdougal4874 - Jeez! Again you lazy troll! Same copy/paste! LOL 😂 Giving yourself "like" is cute! ;-)

Yes, many around the world love any "analysis" that blames the U.S. for someone else's crimes. After admitting her abject incompetence - 0:05 "Many of us did not believe Russia was going to invade Ukraine" - Iversen goes on to offer her analysis nevertheless: the whole invasion is NATO's and the Americans' fault. In fact the opposite is obviously true: had NATO extended membership to Ukraine - which it refused to do! - it is highly unlikely that Russia would have invaded. Moreover, every serious analyst knows that Russia's annexation of Crimea and de facto occupation via proxies of Donbass had absolutely nothing to do with fear of NATO, except again in the negative sense that Putin was able to act with impunity precisely because there was no NATO protection. Zelensky also stated before the invasion he was willing to agree not to seek NATO membership. The whole NATO issue was merely a pretext of Putin. Like other Putin stooges on YT, Iversen completely ignores Putin's speech, where he candidly states Ukraine has no right to exist, was always part of Russia historically, that Ukrainians and Russians are one people, and that its present independence is a historical wrong. Serious analysts, as opposed to ignorant "influencers" telling their wokey audiences what they want to hear, have observed that aside from pure covetousness, what Putin really finds intolerable is Ukraine enjoying a flourishing democracy moving closer to the EU, right in the heart of the old Soviet/Russian empire. It is hard to maintain despotic rule when a young generation of Russians can see their cousins enjoying the benefits of a modern European democracy. But it's an interesting phenomenon that one can attract many followers in the west not by knowing anything but by being a lackey of a foreign despot crushing a sovereign nation.

Kim needs to find a network with more intelligent colleagues bc those other two obviously would rather stump for the establishment war machine. Don’t invade your neighbors? Russia is America’s neighbor and we keep putting weapons around their entire country from Alaska to Estonia.

@@busterrhodes400 exactly!!! It's like they didn't even hear the important facts she pointed out!!

And she admits if she got it wrong.

Any woman that puts makeup on her face to look different or better, is a liar.

@@johnmoates7188 Its a studio setting, its standard to be wearing make up ... even Ryan wil be wearing it, along with a toupee and haircoloring.

After admitting her abject incompetence - 0:05 "Many of us did not believe Russia was going to invade Ukraine" - Iversen goes on to offer her analysis nevertheless: the whole invasion is NATO's and the Americans' fault. In fact the opposite is obviously true: had NATO extended membership to Ukraine - which it refused to do! - it is highly unlikely that Russia would have invaded. Moreover, every serious analyst knows that Russia's annexation of Crimea and de facto occupation via proxies of Donbass had absolutely nothing to do with fear of NATO, except again in the negative sense that Putin was able to act with impunity precisely because there was no NATO protection. Zelensky also stated before the invasion he was willing to agree not to seek NATO membership. The whole NATO issue was merely a pretext of Putin. Like other Putin stooges on YT, Iversen completely ignores Putin's speech, where he candidly states Ukraine has no right to exist, was always part of Russia historically, that Ukrainians and Russians are one people, and that its present independence is a historical wrong. Serious analysts, as opposed to ignorant "influencers" telling their wokey audiences what they want to hear, have observed that aside from pure covetousness, what Putin really finds intolerable is Ukraine enjoying a flourishing democracy moving closer to the EU, right in the heart of the old Soviet/Russian empire. It is hard to maintain despotic rule when a young generation of Russians can see their cousins enjoying the benefits of a modern European democracy. But it's an interesting phenomenon that one can attract many followers in the west not by knowing anything but by being a lackey of a foreign despot crushing a sovereign nation.

@@sheilamacdougal4874 Absolutely true. Her ignorance is also shown when she says NATO should not be on Russia's borders. News flash, dumb dumb, a NATO member country has always been on Soviet Union/Russia's border. They were in 1949 when NATO was formed and they are presently even without Ukraine. So does Putin have the right to invade ANY NATO country that borders Russia? She is either a paid Russian hack or ignorant

her research she gets from a little screen she reads?

She can move to Russia , where she can praise Putin all she wants ... only thing she can do is praise Putin , if she would say a word against she would be in jail .

@@pete_lind INDEED she is a kim jung

Quite apart from your incohetent babbling, your sycophancy is not something you should be proud of. After admitting her abject incompetence - 0:05 "Many of us did not believe Russia was going to invade Ukraine" - Iversen goes on to offer her analysis nevertheless: the whole invasion is NATO's and the Americans' fault. In fact the opposite is obviously true: had NATO extended membership to Ukraine - which it refused to do! - it is highly unlikely that Russia would have invaded. Moreover, every serious analyst knows that Russia's annexation of Crimea and de facto occupation via proxies of Donbass had absolutely nothing to do with fear of NATO, except again in the negative sense that Putin was able to act with impunity precisely because there was no NATO protection. Zelensky also stated before the invasion he was willing to agree not to seek NATO membership. The whole NATO issue was merely a pretext of Putin. Like other Putin stooges on YT, Iversen completely ignores Putin's speech, where he candidly states Ukraine has no right to exist, was always part of Russia historically, that Ukrainians and Russians are one people, and that its present independence is a historical wrong. Serious analysts, as opposed to ignorant "influencers" telling their wokey audiences what they want to hear, have observed that aside from pure covetousness, what Putin really finds intolerable is Ukraine enjoying a flourishing democracy moving closer to the EU, right in the heart of the old Soviet/Russian empire. It is hard to maintain despotic rule when a young generation of Russians can see their cousins enjoying the benefits of a modern European democracy. But it's an interesting phenomenon that one can attract many followers in the west not by knowing anything but by being a lackey of a foreign despot crushing a sovereign nation.

Yeah Emperor Putin has a real nice ring to it doesn’t it??

Putin told America to "stay the f*ck out of our affairs" and America wisely did so. Russia and China and NK have surpassed US. US has many immigrants but most of them do not volunteer for military service...

@@keyfield8967 You are misinformed and not clear about what you mean to say.

@@jamesmedina2062 Medina...I speak, write, and understand English very clearly...

@@keyfield8967 ... And America "wisely" didn't do so....