Wow... thank you for re-affirming my commitment against Evangelicalism

@@redeemedzoomer6053 No problem! The way I look at it is we’re all human, I can’t fault them too much, they’re great folks otherwise.

@@amarok229 yup evangelicals are my brother, they just need to learn a wider perspective

I thought i was an Evangelical, but after hearing all this radical bs im not sure that I am

Sorry if a comment section isn't the place to do it but i am quite curious as to why you chose anglicanism? My very limited knowledge of it is that some king wanted to make his own rules so he could get divorced and that's where it started. Obviously there's gotta be more to it than that but I would like to hear your thoughts if possible

Repent and trust in Jesus. He's the only way. We deserve Hell because we've sinned. Lied, lusted stolen, etc. But God sent his son to die on the cross and rise out of the grave. We can receive forgiveness from Jesus. Repent and put your trust in him. John 3:16 Romans 3:23❤❤❤

Kinda hard to be set apart when you aren’t set apart

Believing the Bible is not cringe

Not what he said@@georgiamapping

@@redlethe8679 He said "Believing the Bible and being distrustful of academics may be cringe." That implies both of the listed items, believing the Bible, and being distrustful of academics may be cringe. So yes, that is virtually what he said

​@georgiamapping I think he meant in the way that being a Christian and also not trusting science makes us look bad. It definetly could've been worded better though.

Liberal ideology is literally anti Christian ideology though. That would be like early Christians in the Roman time saying "our anti idol worship stance is a big reason for why the church isn't growing so maybe we should accept it"

I agree every time I try to go more traditional I find myself just looking at it as so corrupt. Like I tried to stay Catholic my parents were but purgatory, Mary, just focused on sacraments, it was completely missing on the relationship. The pope, the church overall. Calvinism can’t get behind it. I watch this Chanel though and love it. I’ll take my bashing 😂 3 years of recovery with Jesus! Christ alone! Que the fog machine!

@@CouncilofPerseus, you know you can have both, sacraments and personal relationship, right? In fact, they are supposed to be correlated to each other. Maybe some pious writings would help. I’m thinking about things like Story of a Soul by Thérèse of Lisieux.

evangelicals are usually just very scared of catholicism and see it as idolatry while the reformed church is just reformed catholics basically

Repent and trust in Jesus. He's the only way. We deserve Hell because we've sinned. Lied, lusted stolen, etc. But God sent his son to die on the cross and rise out of the grave. We can receive forgiveness from Jesus. Repent and put your trust in him. John 3:16 Romans 3:23❤😊❤❤

As a general rule, people from small towns understand people from cities, but people from cities have no idea whatsoever what people in small towns think or why. Rural vs urban is the greatest divide in humanity, for good reason.

I think you are very, very, very, very colored by your experience in one of the largest cities in the world, and don’t see the major flaws in your thinking on that issue. You are generally great, but sometimes you dig your heels in on something you just don’t fully grasp. You are usually pretty giving with opinion vs fact on theology, but on non-theological issues I think you could stand to open yourself up to other viewpoints. Actually let me rephrase that, you ought to listen to people with differing opinions than yours on art, music, and culture, because you are often arrogant about them.

Rural evangelicals have influenced North America in the last 100 significantly more mainline churches have, and for people living anywhere but the urban northeast, nothing in the entire world is most influential than evangelicalism. Your view on this is so myopic and just flat out wrong.

@@calebneff5777 I think the issue is that we as evangelicals couldn't fight back against the subversion because there is no effective countermeasures against subversion that doesn't require straight up force. The subversion is far from just religious too, its political and cultural. How can we possibly fight back when the enemy hides among us and people end up supporting them or not seeing them as an enemy? Its all Marxist, which is Jewish by nature. Our "greatest allies" hate Christ and hate us as well and yet we treat them as friends and followers of the same God. Take a look at any anti-christian part of our culture and you will find Jews funding it or leading it.

Look up the “rat utopia” experiment sometime if you want to think about why cities are the way they are.

I know, I fixed it in my newer videos. It was a setting in my video editing software that make it like that

@@redeemedzoomer6053 yea no probs i just wanted to put the joke in

@@acethemain7776 he should have responded "no, it's heterodox"

This made me laugh so hard, you wouldn't believe it.

@@SolidestAutumn 😂

Oh man, I've dealt with both. The types that hard preach about hell, and then the others hard preach about Jesus. Or when folks evangelize but ONLY mention Jesus (the cure) without ever teaching about WHY one would need the cure (sin/hell)

Part of the glory of god is to see how truly vast and weird creation is in time and space

Scary how many I’ve seen in my life turn out true well after the fact. I saw the viet nam wall in person. A couple years ago msm even broke that the CIA faked radar to say we were attacked when we were not. Causing all that war did. And no one rioted. No one cared. And thousands died for our govts lies. When the truth eventually comes out about Covid and the 2020 election, woooo boy but I’m sure that won’t be for 50 years or so. That way anyone responsible is well out of the reach of any justice, the population cooming and consuming none the wiser.

You’ve summed up my thoughts so well and I never knew how to explain it. I believe the scientific method is so important when it comes to making decisions and bettering humanity but that doesn’t absolve the scientific community or all scientists or the powers at be, there are many examples of this being abused but we are all forced to believe that the scientific method is being properly used when it’s not

as an evangelical i can say that a majority of them do behave that way, but yeah not all

Totally agree

⁠@@masbucket3083another thing to realize with evangelicalism is that because of the lack of a well-established historical church tradition, the belief system depends heavily on the pastors of the church. I have had both very good and very bad pastors, and the church thrived and suffered accordingly.

⁠@@jacksonhall2334that’s just not true, unless the pastor is completely heretical, they just teach what the bible says.

Fundamentalists churches are heretical more times than not

Huge difference believing that nature was designed to die and evolve vs humanity being a special case that was designed to be different, but experienced death due to the fall. The Bible does not really stand for the no death pre fall position except to people. Indeed, there is countless processes ingeniously designed by God to recycle dead material and perpetuate creation, like fungi. Whole species are entirely designed to clean up or kill populations to keep them under control. I don't see any issue giving God credit for creating such an interconnected and self perpetuating system. And, with everything else in a cycle of death, it makes God's special creation falling from immortality so much worse

Repent and believe the gospel

It goes far beyond evolution though. Flat earthers, political conspiracy theories, etc etc

@@ebercondrell6603 perhaps I guess

One analogy I personally find helpful is to draw from another (frankly more developed) area of science to understand how models can be fundamentally wrong but useful. So let’s talk some physics. If you know anything about Newton’s laws, you’ve probably heard of the second, usually summarized as F=MA. It’s a fundamental law of nature, and forms the basis for describing all of how we understand mechanics. Except it’s wrong. It’s fundamentally incorrect. Einstein’s theories of relativity show that F=MA is a very very good approximation, but it is, technically speaking, wrong. Evolutionary theory is as much a pillar of modern biology as Newton is/was of physics. It’s not hard to imagine in 100 years a shift in theory that explains how it is a useful model yet not entirely accurate. Herein lies the soul of true science: continual discovery and questioning, not a dogmatic sticking to one theory to explain everything.

Sorry you cannot. Evolution happened and is happening and that’s an objective and obvious fact. You still have some YEC poison clouding your vision I think.

@@timothysullivan1669well I think you fail to see the difference in the two theories. In 100 years evolution will still look like the same model. Genetics isn’t going anywhere and natural selection is logically true as well as observed. It’s worked this way since life began and there isn’t any data that could change that past.

Evangelicals are a Protestant movement. lol

@@redlethe8679 they are not really considered protestant where i live and they have a completely different theology and structure.

I agree. I dont know how widespread this is, but in my church an media i consume, there is always warning to stay away from prosperity gospel.😊

well put

I disagree with the view that cities are not self-reliant. On the contrary, when I came of age I left my small town and moved to the city because I couldn’t stand the mindset of dependence and fatalism that existed in a rural town in the Rust Belt. Except for essential services, there was only one employer (a local factory) so the idea was that you would work for this factory for basically your entire working career. You would join the local union, the local “old boys club” institutions. And if you got fired from the factory or the union didn’t like you, or if the local evangelical church rejected you, well… let’s just say your options for employment or a social life elsewhere are limited. Contrast that with the city. You’ll be surrounded 24/7 by people who are smarter than you, who will work harder than you, and who will throw you under the bus at the earliest opportunity and not lose a wink of sleep over it. But on the plus side, if your employer mistreats you, you can walk out the door and across the street and probably have another job within the hour. Heck, I have recruiters reaching out to *me* encouraging me to apply because they need people. Not to mention that there is every demographic and every social outlet for every sort of person you could ever need here. I have never felt more self-reliant and in control of my own life and career since moving to the city. Granted, my city is not a place where everyone knows everyone. This is not a place where you see your daddy’s buddy’s sister’s girlfriend’s former roommate on a leisurely stroll down the street and stop to have a conversation for 3 hours, because what else do we have to do on a Sunday, amirite? This is a place where thousands of people traverse every single day, working 70 hours a week to pay the high rent, walking past the homeless on every corner to remind us what could happen if we fail. But we also pass by skyscrapers and limousines to remind of of what’s possible if we succeed. It’s capitalism and self-reliance at its most pure.

Look up the rat utopia experiment

Roman Catholicism is a lie. You yourself acknowledge the liberal nutter who is your current pope. Papal infallibility is demonstrably untrue.

No such thing as "Judeo-Christian", just Christian

@@user-gd2rg8xg2y I'm not sure how you can argue that effectively. "Not one iota of the law is to be changed" after all.

This is true. In college I went to a SBC church even though i grew up Pentacostal. I went there because they were theologically sound, even if i disagreed with some of their beliefs. And they knew I was Pentecostal too. They simply asked that I am willing to learn under their beliefs, but that I dont have to change mine

The worst part about it is that I equated Christianity with evangelicalism. I imagine many Americans do the same thing. In rural areas especially, evangelicalism is the only Christianity many people know.

@@moisheplatinumberg6016Not in the Midwest and Northeast! I remember growing up in Iowa, even most of the super religiously conservative people were Lutheran, Methodist or Reformed. People associated Evangelicals not with theological conservatism but rather new age worship styles with electric guitars and drums on stage, people dressed like it’s a kids soccer tournament, the pastor in a suit rather than a robe and generally more of a “fringe” attitude.

Part of me feels this is his youthful naïveté. Seems the keys to power were firmly held which prompted the leave in the first place.

Have as many children as God blesses you with.

Completely agree. I’ve noticed this in a lot of his critique of other subjects in other videos too. Love the content overall but this is not what I have experienced with evangelicals either.

Even Darwin himself said it was wrong!

In what sense has it been discredited? Is there any scientific source you can cite to for that other than answers in genesis?

@@jonathanw1106 Yes indeed. The 1953 Stanley Miller Experiment proved that even in a lab with all the perfect ratios of chemicals and raw materials present at The Big Bang you can not even create amino acids, much less living cells with all their vast complexity. The conclusion of that experiment is that science (or rather scientists) don’t have the slightest clue how life began, and therefore necessitates a Creator. Secondly, the fossil record of the Cambrian Explosion does not support an evolution of differing species over millions or years. Rather, you see common ancestry at the specie level, but the evidence does not support common ancestry at the higher levels. In other words, Darwin’s tree of life is nothing more than a pretty picture. It is not grounded in reality. Third, the pictures of Haekel’s embryos have been proven to be faked, fudged, and misleading. Fourth, the idea that since humans and apes share 98% of the same genes means we share a common ancestor is flawed because it actually supports the Creationist case. In much the same way that Microsoft uses a lot of the same code in all their various applications, so too did God use much the same DNA in the creation of the various species. Fifth, the Archaeopteryx (the supposed missing link between bird and reptiles) has been shown to be fraudulent. So too the Java Man (the supposed missing link between between apes and humans) was a fraudulent fossil where they combined human remains with ape fossils and called it science. You must understand that Darwinism is a philosophy still in search of convincing empirical data. It is masquerading itself as science.

“It’s not science it’s a theory.” Bro what? Theories are part of science. A scientific “theory” isn’t a “guess,” it’s an explanation that unifies a broad range of facts and hypotheses (testable claims) and can be used to make predictions.

@@user-ch7zi7zn8tNo he didn’t. And also, the science of evolution has moved on from simple Darwinism. There are other theories of evolution that improve upon Darwinism.

Thank you for your comment, but you should know that despite not being evangelical, I am profoundly conservative. I hold the same views Evangelicals and Catholics generally do about LGBT, only unlike Evangelicals, I stay in the mainline to try and make it more conservative. I do agree with you completely about science, vaccines, and medicine and such.