1:50 bullshit "cossacks" means all population with free of will, lived on border empire, exactly Khabarov and Yermak borned in border of contemporary Arkhangelsk oblast , lands with russian ethnic majority. cossacks in this contecst was social strata called "Ushkuyniks" free people of 14-15 cen. organaised in "bands"moving by lightweight boats and atacks lokals for loot like vikings in 12 cen.

The author, the Russians came from the territory of modern Sweden and have the right to claim these historical lands, but here is a propagandist freak who deliberately distorts one information, and decided to keep silent about the other completely.

test@@jacksparrow2351

​@@jacksparrow2351до прихода царской России, половина сегодняшний территории казахстан был часть территории Узбеков Кокандское Ханства. После падения Кокандское Ханства, власти царской России и Большевики несколько раз нарисовали карту по разному и северо-восточной территории Узбеков (Кокандское Ханства) казахам. До прихода царской России, у казахов не было централизованный государства и не было у них города. казахи жили в голом степи как индейцы. То что сейчас имеют это большевики из части территории Узбеков нарисовали казахам. У нас Узбеков было три свои государства. Кокандское Ханства Бухарский Ханства Хивинское Ханства. Большевики чтобы ослабить Узбеков,из части территории Узбеков нарисовали Таджикистан Киргизстан Туркменистан Казахстан и Узбекам специально оставили маленький территория.

I’m not sure we can trust random videos from KZfaq. Here they stopped telling the truth a long time ago and everyone says what they want

Not a single inch of Siberia is in Europe.

​@@desm3225 as an asian no fuck no Russians are Europeans

​@@desm3225 how so? Are Finland and hungary also eurasian?

@@desm3225 Greece is fully European

@@IronWarrior86 This is debatable to the extreme. If you go deep enough into the rabbit hole, you'll see that Europe is considered a continent for historical and cultural reasons. Geographically and geologically, it's just a giant peninsula of Asia. That's cause they're both sometimes called Eurasia.

Alaska and California.

@@MrVeryfrost Research hidden history of Tartaria and you undersand why Russia started from California to Asia. So much rewritten history and even here they don't say how it is.

Ahh alaska you know many russians regret selling it not only because of the recources but also because it was once russian land. The tsarist administration knew about them but didnt had the funds to extract transport then or protect the territory at the time.

@@evgeniam685 Ты троллишь?😁

Russia being based though

Wow! You wrote so much! Where are you from. Thanks for giving us more insight about Siberia.

"the Siberian Khanate.... made regular raids on russian territory near Urals..." This is myth. On the contrary, russians made raids into Siberian territory.

@@navneetshyam1335 You are welcome) I am from Russia, and studied the question

@@toktarsamykenov1697 No, that is not a myth. Raids can be done only by people, who do not work on the land - because agriculture takes too much time and efforts from you, and raiders must be very mobile (that is also why raiders always require big amount of horses or ships - so vehicles that allows them to quickly appear, pillage, and go away after). Russia was majorly peasant, while Tyumen Khanate and Siberian Khanate had much less peasants and much more hunters and cattlemen, who are exactly ready mobile units - that is because the climate in Siberian Khanate was much more harsh and thus much less suitable for agriculture (consequently, significantly less peasants). The only units in Russian Tsarsdom, who could have been doing regular raids, were either ukshuyniki (river pirares - but there are no rivers that flow through Ural mountains from European Russia to Western Siberia) or cossacks, who mostly lived closer to the steppes and thus in many aspects of everyday life lived same way as steppe nomads - but, once again, amount of cossacks near Ural mountains was significantly less than respective amount of raiders in Siberian Khanate. To sum up: yes, there indeed were regular raiders from Siberian Khanate, that attacked land of Russian Tsarsdom, and no, Russian Tsarsdom didn't regular raids on Siberian Khanate.

​@@thedreamscripter4002👍

hello from Chuvash Republic)

I heard this is false: The Tatars DID have firearms. However, their equipment and fortifications were in extremely poor state, and the Siberians were not combat trained, hence, they melted away at the Cossack assault.

@@Wasserkaktus Tatars and other Turks were too heavily reliant on Horse archery and were proud of their Successful military traditions that they didnt want to change/adapt to newer tactics and equipment. Though they had access to firearms via trade but not used in a large military capacity or tactical strategy. Plus they couldnt manufacture them on their own and hence had limited expertise on how to effectively use them.

@@muhammadadeel8639 Yeah but this battle saw the Cossacks get mostly ambushed by Tartar hunters with firearms. You're right in that it was largely ineffective, and once the Siberians' leader in this battle was killed, the resistance to the Cossacks melted away.

U write truth about 50%, other 50% was betreyed by muslim mankurts from Amir Temir whose attack Golden Horde and killed a lot of citizens. After this heavily deadly war Golden Horde collapse into several little Hordes: Kazan, Astrakhan, Kyrym (crimea), Nogai, Sibiria horde. Then European gave a technology and zero percent loans for Moscow.

No one has ever mistaken Siberia for Europe ever. I don't know what this guy is smoking but he should market it!

Russia is trans 🏳️‍🌈

@@orlandixstudios6032 😀😉

@@orlandixstudios6032 strictly anti trans

@@annehersey9895 It geographically falls in Asia, but is culturally and politically considered European, since it is a part of Russia. The Rus come from Europe.

That last statement is incorrect. While it did take quite a bit of time for Russia to incorporate the territory into Russia proper, it was formally incorporated into the Russian Empire in 1863; With Russian influence in the region beginning in the late 17th century and steadily growing and cementing itself until its incorporation.

@@gabrielrodriguezcintron2081 Yes, exactly. Formally.

Since you are making corrections - it's "mercEnary" (E not your I) 🤪

@@b213videoz Thanks 👍

The Demidovs weren’t oligarchs, they were entrepreneurs and manufacturers. The House of Demidov (Russian: Демидовы) also Demidoff, was a prominent Russian noble family during the 18th and 19th centuries. Originating in the city of Tula in the 17th century, the Demidovs found success through metal products, and were entered into the European nobility by Peter the Great. Their descendants became among the most influential merchants and earliest industrialists in the Russian Empire, and at their peak were predicted to be the second-richest family in Russia, behind only the Russian Imperial Family. The Demidov family lost its fortune after the February Revolution of 1917, but continues to exist under the rendering Demidoff.

Ok Caucasian lived there until Mongolians invaded, it was original European phenotype people

The process of mass settlement was in the 20th century. Before that, there was assimilation of the local population. The ROC taught people writing. The Cossacks collected tribute from the lands in the form of animal skins. Peasants fleeing serfdom, repressed nobles and adventurers moved to Siberia. The process is very difficult to describe. That's why it's called joining. I am writing as a resident of Western Siberia. My ancestors are too diverse. The village of my ancestors, who have my surname, is located on the road where the Decembrists were introduced earlier. In fact, there are two wars: the Siberian Khanate and the Chukchi. A bunch of nations that were just annexed and taxed. The benefits of joining were huge, paying with animal skins and receiving protection from neighboring tribes.

@@joemama4473 Caucasians are located in the Caucasus, not in Siberia

@@joemama4473 I wonder if the Tatars know that Caucasians lived on their territories? And you haven’t named which state these territories belonged to.

Cossacks certainly met Machurians on the Amur river banks, they even had clashes and later Nerchin agreements. And in that times Manchurians were ruling China. Don't lie or misinform people.

​@@woefulfisheris like 1700 or 18th Century

In 17 century there was no russia. Moscovia stoled the greek name of Rus (rossia) only in 1721. Even the moscovians continued to call themselves "moscovians", because they didn't understand why they are russians now. And other nations didn't call Moscovia "russia" for a long time. Especially neighbours, because they knew that Rus is a territory of Ukraine. After Golden Horde invasion in 1241 on western ukrainian lands quickly emerged the Kingdom of Rus, and when Lithuanians and Rusyny defeated the Golden Horde in another ukrainian lands emerged another country - the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, Rus and Samogitia. When Kingdom of Rus become a part of the Kingdom of Poland it was called Rus Voivodeship. Modern Ukrainians untill the 19 century was called Rus/Rusyny/Rusychi/Ruthenians. From 16 century ukrainians had another names like "Ukrainians" and "Cossacks", but they were used with names Rus and Rusyny. And moscovian people never was Rus. In 10-12 centuries lands of future Moscovia was inhabited by completely different tribes, even not Slavic - Volga Fins, which was under the rule of Rus and paid tribute to the Prince of Kyiv, and sons or relatives of Prince of Kyiv ruled those lands. That's it. And the names of their lands was Vladimiro-Suzdal principality, then Moscovian principality, then Moscovia. They never was Rus, they just used to steal everything: lands, someone's history, household appliances from the occupied territories.

All the rubbish you people come up with because of the current war. None of you used to call Kiev as Kyiv. but now you all do because you are told to call it as such. And Kievan Rus started in Novgorod, not in Kiev. They conquered Kiev and made it the capital. The people who started the Rus have nothing to do with ukros

@@one.girl...1 yes rus people. Russia , Ukrainians and Belarusians all are rus people.

where the hungarians came from

This whole video is a fraud. There are so many "mistakes" in it. It is on purpose too I suppose,

@@gogaonzhezhora8640 What is wrong with it and why?

@@gogaonzhezhora8640 Ah yes… Plenty of flaws you can’t even point out.

@@erikthomsen4768 I don't have whole day for that. And you should study.

No. The video is unbelievably inaccurate.

@@Rai2M OK

Lol they didn’t want that shit happening again

It was not paranoia, but an ever present reality for the Russian people in those times. Unlike Anglos, Germans or French, we were never blessed with a nice defensible geographic position, but were simply put next to the great steppe and the vile barbarians inhabiting it. Without any mountains or seas to protect us from them. Long before Mongols, Turkic nomads were raiding and pillaging our cities and towns, taking our people as slaves and selling them to Arabs and beyond, so much so, that even our own Slavic name became synonymous with the institute of SLAVery. And those vile savages kept doing it long after the fall of The Mongol state. The Mongols were just one of those nomadic lords who lived by pillaging, plundering and extorting tribute from the sedentary populations around them. Only by the 18th century did the Russian state manage to put an end to the ever present threat of endless Tatar raids into our very core territories and our conquest of Siberia was just a part of this process. The steppe had to be tamed, the barbarians had to be brought to heal so that our people could live in peace. The real world is not about guilt and other bs, it's about either we prevail or we will be slaves to someone stronger.

The fear of an invasion drives The Russian Mindset until current days

@@michael_crow while I entirely agree with your comment and have extreme compassion for Russians and Slavs (borderlands and steppes), remember that Anglos ruled the peninsula of all peninsulas because we’re the gods of war.

Russia was never invaded by the mongols, it was all the way around. Russia invaded the mongols

western bs factory

What are you talking about?

And this hints that the rest of what has been said can be treated with a certain amount of distrust.

3 stars general

The Cossack leader Yermak was Ukranian

@@user-zv4jf8ag8p and Jesus Christ was Ukrainian:)

​​@@user-zv4jf8ag8pnd franches is Ukrainian too, because their ancestors - Gauls - was from the galicia. I like Ukrainian "history", I think everybody should name it "tale" not the history

It's not a coincidence you didn't learn this in school.

@@esoterra8050 we did, but our schools did their best to make it as boring as possible

Better not learn it from the Russian falsified history .

That's very common. I've met a number of Russian that just say they are from Russia because they know the average American wouldn't know other cities in Russia besides Moscow and St Petersburg

@@esoterra8050 He is just an idiot. And you a propaganda victim. If he'd actually learn a thing at school he'd know real history.

the facts are poorly presented and everything else, the assumed reasons, the motives etc won't stand up to scrutiny.

it's mostly bs unfortunately, but real history of russia is even more interesting, i encourage you to learn it, despite it's gonna be hard cuz anything on russia in the west is stuffed with propaganda like this one.

Аляска не была взята кем то,она была открыта русскими мореплавателями

At least some of it was Siberia. West Indies, Indians in America? Totaly wrong continent.

Literally the same story with Africa. Africa initially referred to the region of a north African tribe called the Ifri (Afri) and the Romans called their land Africa. Then the further south you went the whole continent was given that name.

They never did. American geographers call all beyond Urals Siberia. Idiotic.

​@@fartz3808 and with Asia as well.

Considering how sparsely populated it was and the absence of writing of the locals, no wonder they had to come up with something to call all of that inhospitable land.

Like Part 1, 2, 3...etc.?

You won't learn anything by looking at stupid posts from history on KZfaq, you'll have to make an effort yourself.

@@user-lf2jh2ru9f Thanks for the useless comment.

@@davej652 To Intelligent enough.

@@davej652 If you haven't, learn a little about the biggest historical fraud ever...... kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aqx7h7V_vr7Klas.html

seeing -3 in the corner made it way funnier than it should've been

in a normal winter, children may not go to school but play hockey

Why would anyone should study the history by russian books? 🤔 the russian official history is one big lie and mystificaton. And russian grandpa just proved it in his last interview.

From lying katsaps?

this is a patronymic, but in author understanding it is a surname

To be fair some of these Russian minorities still have a population of over 1 million and in the 90s they almost got independence .meanwhile the biggest native American tribe only has 100k people most have way less .

Oklahoma?

There are lots of reservations in America that give self rule to the native populations there, especially in the West.

Θάνος Κυριακόπουλος...your country Greece still has a flag of British colonial origin as its national flag today....btw in 1923 the greek government and the turkish government did the so called population exchange but that was done by force and not on ethnic or linguistic grounds but on religious grounds....in short, those who were Muslims became Turks those who were Orthodox became Greeks we're talking about a million and a half people on both sides...so take a look at your garden before criticizing others

The closest would be reservations where the indigenous are given some sort of autonomy. There's an interesting case of a casino being found between two localities that prohibited its presence because the casino just barely within a reservation. The casino was approved by the indigenous leader of that reservation and the two states couldn't do nothing about it.

@lazarus921 you are right about Hungarians, but about Kyrgysians it's unclear. They are presented on the Mongolian maps of Chingis Khan period in Siberia

Hey jerks, remember already. Russia owns 45 percent of the European continent. Russians own 45 percent of Europe. Don't you study geography in your schools? The Russians (Swedish tribe Rus or Ruotsi) came from the territory of modern Sweden ("The Way from the Varangians to the Greeks"). In the 9th century, the Russian Varangians adopted Christianity and adopted the Slavic language. Russian Russians have created the largest Varangian state (the real Russians are fair-haired people with light eyes, so our main neighbors Finns still call Russians Ruots, which means light-haired brown hair). Therefore, Russians have the right to claim the territory of modern Sweden. In the future, the Russians will share Europe with the Arabs.

​@@user-xm6zs6ez6iНам писали историю немцы, забыв спросить нас, кто мы и откуда😅 И нет, русские это не шведы, да мы родственны, но это они пошли частично от нас, а не мы от них😊

О, сам придумал, сам поверил...

@@andromeda8013 эту байку далеко не мне одному хохлы втирают. Ты кстати можешь загуглить это

Ukrainians always tell an alternate history. They always do it man. It is what it is

No, Ukrainians know that moscovians love to shed blood and always want to steal something: lands, someone's history, household appliances from the occupied territories. And of course they love to spread nonsense and russian propaganda like this comment.

Ukrainians have been brainwashed with alternative world history for over 30 years. As usual, it all ends tragically. Until they accept the realities of history, they will continue to suffer. It's not even about the Russians

Before turkic people it was inhabited by Iranian and other indo European tribes so turkic conquered indo Europeans

@@Kolsedy I doubt it. Turkic people have epicanthic eyes like all asians which is an evolutionary trait that this ethnicity gained due to the cold climate of the Siberian cold and windy climate. persian facial features are consistent with southern regions on the continent.

Much of northern Russia was originally inhabited by Uralic peoples

@@jasemalhammadi4228 Turks tends to claim a lot of history though

@@hentehoo27 yep uralics too

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/lbiYrdNkusmvgKc.html

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hJyjnrmBr9zecqs.html

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nuCHhbOQr9y5iXk.html

unfortunately you've learned pretty much nothing cuz its mostly bs. but i encourage you to learn actual russian history. its really entertaining. hard to find in the west tho - mostly filled with propaganda.

Or maybe somewhere in Scandinavia?

@@BlueTyphoon2017 could be possible

It was actually real, but was erased from history and called as legend. Tartaria also. It wasn't that long time ago. Research

⁠​⁠@@evgeniam685take your meds schizo. Tartaria never existed as a political entity.

​@@evgeniam685tataria didn't exist stfu

wish kings and generals would do video on this one day.

​@@Remonloreanti Russian bias, I'm really into the history of the rus, but I notice more and more people hating on Russians just for existing

Lev Gumilyev

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/lbiYrdNkusmvgKc.html 1920s

Research about Tartaria. It's way more interesting. Hidden civilization erased from history during that time. And history was rewritten

Till this day Russia is trying to clean out Nato just like the soviets did with hitler. Crazy for America to think it can destroy it, they’ve been doing this shit since 1800s lol

In Russia's case was a struggle against natural enemies

they never crossed any oceans, so it was theirs rightfully

Not really... The American empires were engaged in civil wars, revolts and what not by the time the Spaniards showed up.

@@Monsieurlemon2 by that logic, Siberia is rightfully China’s.

europe is a butt of asia 😮

Phrasing.

it's their thing, Anything the Turks or Mongols do = good. Anything White or Christian = Expansionist or bad. even though it they who attack the Christians first

The ending of Russian patronims is never -ish, it's always -ich. So, it's Timofeevich, not Timofeevish.

@@gintasvilkelis2544 That was a spelling mistake at the end

No, under the rule of Golden Horde for 300 years were moscovians. But Rusyny (Rus, Rusychi, who have nothing to do with modern "russians") from Rus - around 120 years. Moscovia is not Rus. Moscovia stoled the greek name of Rus (rossia) only in 1721. Even moscovians continued to call themselves "moscovians", because they didn't understand why they are russians now. And other nations didn't call Moscovia "russia" for a long time. Especially neighbours, because they knew that Rus is a territory of Ukraine. After Golden Horde invasion in 1241 on western ukrainian lands quickly emerged the Kingdom of Rus, and when Lithuanians and Rusyny defeated the Golden Horde another ukrainian lands became a part of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, Rus and Samogitia. When Kingdom of Rus became a part of the Kingdom of Poland it was called Rus Voivodeship. Modern Ukrainians untill the 19 century was called Rus/Rusyny/Rusychi/Ruthenians. From 16 century ukrainians had another names like "Ukrainians" and "Cossacks", but they were used with names Rus and Rusyny. And moscovian people never was Rus. In 10-12 centuries lands of future Moscovia was inhabited by completely different tribes, even not Slavic - Volga Finns, which was under the rule of Rus (like Gaul (France) was under the rule of Roman Empire (Italy)) and paid tribute to the Prince of Kyiv, and sons or relatives of Prince of Kyiv ruled those lands. That's it. When they went to Principality of Kyiv or Principality of Chernihiv or Principality of Pereyaslav (Ukrainian lands, which actually was called Rus) they said they "go to Rus". It is in the chronicles. And the names of their lands was Vladimiro-Suzdal principality, then Moscovian principality, then Moscovia. They never was Rus, they just used to steal everything: someone's lands, someone's history, household appliances from the occupied territories.

@@one.girl...1 Complete and utter BS. Read the Primary Chronicles. It clearly states that Rus started when 5 tribes (2 slavic and 3 Finnic - all from what is now Russia and Belarus) united and invited Rurik of Rus tribe to be their leader. Ladoga. Pskov and Novgorod were the main centres of early Rus. Later they Rus+those 5 tribes conquered Kiev. So Rus were always invaders on what is now Ukraine

How do you know what he says is true?

Who’s to say, Siberia is super remote. Similar to how Europeans couldn’t enter Africa for the longest time due to diseases against which they had no immunity .

@@AnoopSathyan0197 trade between nomads and tribes to north and nomads to civilization to south.

Had distance

@@MbisonBalrog While they were not completely isolated, the were isolated enough. Evidence shows their immune systems were not adopted to the same diseases.

​@@MbisonBalrog vikings set foot on america before all other european powers, it didn't result in a mass extinction event then You need far larger numbers than a few dozen nomads once in a blue moon to spread desieses fast enough to kill an entire civilisation

Good

Valid point, also. This just shows the real human nature all over the world.

No one cares, why you felt attacked by this video?

As a resident of the territory where the center of the Siberian Khanate was, I will say that states could not have appeared to the east. There is a temperature difference of about sixty degrees per year with good temperature. in 2023, the drop was 75 degrees.

i got here after i've read about "annexation of Siberia" in preview... Thanks for this comment which is not fucked up at all, with love from Russia

As a resident of Siberia, I will tell you that Russia has not particularly modernized Siberia and the Far East. In reality, there is basically one devastation, the people are getting poorer, drunk and shrinking. If you do not believe me, try to visit these places and you will be convinced of my words.

@@zhalsanavrain2296 that is true for some groups of Asian ethnicity living in Siberia, for example Kazaks (Kazakhs) in Altai villages or Yakutians in the Far East. These ethnicities do have genetic susceptibility to alcohol just like American Indians. I can tell by your nickname that you might have seen Siberian Kazakhs.

@@Intourist. The indigenous peoples of Siberia, on the contrary, have an intolerance to alcohol. From this follows the so-called predisposition To alcohol. Before the arrival of Russians, indigenous peoples did not drink alcohol in such quantities as they do now. The soldering of indigenous peoples is one of the tools of the Russian state to suppress the consciousness of indigenous peoples. As for the Kazakhs , they are not indigenous to the territory of Siberia, but only live in the south of the Altai Republic in connection with historical events. I am a representative of the indigenous Siberian people of the Buryats.

@@zhalsanavrain2296 Buryats are respected by Russian state and are treated equally. Datsan Gunzechoinei, the largest Buddhist temple in of the Russian North-West had been erected close to downtown St Petersburg in 1909 and is presently the centre of attraction as a Buryat culture spot in the city. Dorzhiev, a Buryatian activist had spearheaded the works, the building having been designed by a Russian architect Gavriil Baranovski. Russians have tended not to suppress the almost 200 ethnicities inhabiting the country, but have gradually incorporated them into Russian life on an equal basis. Alcohol is available in Buryatia just as has been in St Petersburg or Moscow, I don't believe in conspiracies related to it. I have seen the contrary, in some regions alcohol is subject to greater tax than in Slavic regions, for example in the republic of Tatarstan. On the other hand, I recognise that the West while seeking to partition Russia through Siberia is likely to spread such conspiracy theories through its NGOs across Siberia.

real

Cossacks weren't an ethnicity, they were akin to an estate, 'cause they were formed from serfs escaped from their overlords

@@user-yb3fh6vr3t It depends. Children of these people got land privilegies and became subethnicity in the next generation

Good point. But we have to hate everything connected to Russia(ns) nowadays, so stick to this TRUE STORY.

@@babrakoberma673 Wrong. Europeans did not build imunity. Far East tribes were vulnerable to the same level as American natives to smallpox. P.S. Russia is country of neo nazism, country of warmongers, murderers, rapists, looters and liars. Most of Russians are amoral people who support elimination of Ukraine as country, language and people. I hear it all day long in Russian TV propaganda, Telegramm, KZfaq etc. When Russia annexed Crimea in 2014 and other regions of Ukraine in 2022 it lost its own rights of teritorial integrity. I hope Ukraine will incorporate Russia lands to Ural mountains. Referendums will be held and 90% people will vote for joining Ukraine.

People of Southern Siberia probably did, but not those living in Permafrost.

Two headed Eagle is claim of Russian zars that Russia is the third Rome. Byzantine Roman symbol is two headed eagle. Russia is no more European. It Asian state of autoritarianism and new kind of Nazism - Rushism.

Europe under America’s boot has made Russia go EurASIAN. Russia’s two most important partners now are China & India

russia is not european

​@@pjdu5yifutd cry about it

@@pjdu5yifutd Russia is Russian

Yes.

@@ridor9th Thanks, I thoought asmuch, but wasn't sure..

Yeahhh...but the same time reservations for the local population is larger than some big states in Europe and is a zone of self-government where Russians are required to learn the local language ..

Whoever compared Russian conquest of Siberia to American colonialism of the native population needs their brains checked. The native Siberians have their own republic and autonomy and they were not subject to genocide. The native Americans were subject to genocide with 90% of natives gone, they were forcibly removed from their native lands to reservations where poverty and substance abuse is prevalent. There is no comparison.

@Cypher Somewhat related, if not a continuation of the Russian push east.

@Cypher Indians and Eskimos are literally descended from Siberians

@@Peorhum Yeah, but the video title tells you the limit of what's covered.

Geographically it is part of Siberia. But after the Beringia land bridge sunk under the waves people count it separately.

"..... При этом, истребления населения, как это часто бывало в европейской практике (особенно вспоминая деятельность испанцев, англичан, французов на обеих Америках) не происходило...." Ещё как происходило, похлеще чем в Америке.

волны, поляки, пленные шведы, казаки с Яика - зачем? Какая мотивация? Не важно из кого состояли волны, важна мотивация, - Зачем? В видео прекрасно все объяснено с точки зрения мотивации: Торговля Мехом. Вооруженные люди идут устанавливать свою власть и флаг только туда, где есть Выгодная Торговля. Разумеется, нельзя обобщать, что шли убивать и грабить. Нет, самый выгодный и распространенный способ захвата территории империей - Подкуп Местных Элит, предоставление им "крыши" более высокого, авторитетного уровня.

ты хоть про коряков молчал бы, дятел. Анкудинов грабил и убивал их как хотел. Нынешние коряки это остатки коренного населения Камчатки.

"...Въ Камчаткѣ напримѣръ, можно ѣздить на собакахъ, запряженныхъ въ небольшія санки (нарты), такъ какъ тропинки, слывущія тамъ подъ именемъ дорогъ, чрезвычайно узки. Между тѣмъ начальникъ Камчатки Козловъ-Угреинъ разъѣзжалъ постоянно въ возкѣ со стеклами. Подъ возокъ запрягали не менѣе 50 собакъ, а камчадалы по всей дорогѣ вырубали лѣсъ, чтобы возокъ не завязъ. Эти разъѣзды были до того пагубны для собакъ, что все управленіе Козлова-Угреина народъ окрестилъ именемъ собачей оспы. Всѣ мало-мальски значительные люди въ Сибири любили путешествовать. Это было чрезвычайно выгодно -- инородцы даромъ давали подводы, инородцы даромъ кормили проѣзжающихъ; инородцы непремѣнно дарили каждаго рангованнаго человѣка, инородцевъ можно было спаивать виномъ и отнимать у нихъ соболей; съ инородцами можно было сердцеватъ, т. е. притворившись сердечнымъ ихъ доброжелателемъ, выманивать у нихъ цѣнныя вещи!.. Да, тогда русскіе сибиряки любили путешествовать! Когда напр., въ Камчаткѣ учредили областное управленіе и ввели туда батальонъ, то тамъ поселилось множество чиновниковъ и офицеровъ. Батальонъ размѣстили но разнымъ частямъ полуострова. И вотъ тутъ-то разные чины начали разъѣзжать но Камчаткѣ подъ предлогомъ разныхъ смотровъ, свидѣтельствъ и проч., а въ самомъ дѣлѣ для того чтобы вымѣнивать у камчадаловъ на водку соболей и лисицъ. "Мода путешествовать, пишетъ Головнинъ, отъ чиновниковъ распространилась даже на простыхъ подъячихъ и солдатъ, которые просились въ отпускъ, съ тѣмъ чтобы промыслить для себя и для собакъ корму, но купивъ вина, ѣздили по острожкамъ и обманывали камчадаловъ. А зналъ одного офицера, который отпускалъ изъ своей команды солдатъ въ отпускъ и давалъ имъ денегъ на покупку вина, за которыя бралъ проценты по два соболя съ 25 р.; очень вѣроятно, что и многіе такъ дѣлали". Да, многіе такъ дѣлали и не въ одной Камчаткѣ, а по всей Сибири, Вино лилось огненнымъ потокомъ по инородческимъ поселеніямъ, сожигая и инородческое богатство и ихъ здоровую и патріархальную нравственность. Инородецъ все отдаетъ за водку, онъ отдаетъ за нее даже свою свободу. И безсовѣстные торгаши пользовались этимъ; инородцы пропивались до нага и за кратковременное удовольствіе платили продолжительными голодовками, питаясь падалью и толченою древесною корой. До этого ихъ доводила, впрочемъ, не одна виноторговли, но и всякая торговля...." Серафим Шашков "Сибирские инородцы в 19 столетии"

Not exactly. France owned much of the land west of the Mississippi before they sold it to the US to fund their Napoleon wars. Even after that Mexico owned a huge portion of the western land before the Mexican American war. Russia didn’t have anything like that happen with their conquests.

The USA was much more genocidal. Hitler said in Mein Kampf he wanted to do to the Slavs what the USA had done to native Americans

Except God is on the US' side.

Siberians are practically the same people as Indians and Eskimos

Forgot about all the Indians the army had to kill

I heard a similar argument recently regarding the Chinese conquest of Mongolia. But of course that didn’t happen. Mongolia was the one was falling behind and the narrow minded focus on North Asia left the Chinese blindsided to the rising naval powers on the East Coast. A bit like Russia I suppose in the West.

Russians went to east, because was mutch easier go to East then to west. Answer. Nothing to do with Mongolians

​@@erikthomsen4768It wasn't just the Mongolians, they were just one of a long, long history of nomads raiding the geographically indefensible eastern Europe. They kidnapped and sold so many slavs into slavery that the institution itself came to be named after them. It was only with the gun and a large enough state that bureaucratic warfare was able to turn the tide and it was instead the sedentary people conquering the nomads.

the Mongols came from the south, crossing the territory of modern Kazakhstan.

It was no wild east. Ther lived people and there was a country.

*Dude, don’t write what you don’t know ... the Don Cossacks were never serfs, and the outflow of the population from central Russia to Siberia began under Peter 1, his church reform of Patriarch Nikon, so according to various estimates of historians, the outflow of the population of Russia ranged from 20 to 40% of all subjects of Emperor Peter, and only Catherine 2 managed to return part of the population under the rule of the imperial crown!*

​@@UltraTotenkopfтак этот хлебушек не знает и про немцев что пошли в Сибирь при Екатерине 2. Сравнивание рабство и крепостничество глупо. Плюс если смотреть истории сегрегации в сша она до сих пор в той или иной мере распространена. В России после 17 года такие приколы прямой путь в ГУЛАГ .

​@@ingus5552what was the name of this country?

Hey jerks, remember already. Russia owns 45 percent of the European continent. Russians own 45 percent of Europe. Don't you study geography in your schools? The Russians (Swedish tribe Rus or Ruotsi) came from the territory of modern Sweden ("The Way from the Varangians to the Greeks"). In the 9th century, the Russian Varangians adopted Christianity and adopted the Slavic language. Russian Russians have created the largest Varangian state (the real Russians are fair-haired people with light eyes, so our main neighbors Finns still call Russians Ruots, which means light-haired brown hair). Therefore, Russians have the right to claim the territory of modern Sweden. In the future, the Russians will share Europe with the Arabs. Alaska - Russia.

You mean it's amazing how many groups they conquered and eradicated the cultures of, and forced to Russify. Fixed it for you.

No, they are not. The vast majority of the Russian Far East are of European origin. We do not look like Chinese or Japanese people. Surely, here are some asian ethnicities but they make roughly 10% of the total population of the region.

So you were never in Dagestag or Yakutia. You ought to travel there, or some other territory of Russia's East. I assure you, the indigenous people were not white, nor were they speaking Russian before it was forced onto them

@@alta5688 I'm literally from Buryatia, dude

@@dmitrijpetrov1905 Your name is most definitely NOT Buryatian, It's classic Russian. So thank you for proving my point, that Russia colonised their neighbours, including Buryatia.

well they can't pronounce Iraq properly so what do you expect. they keep calling it eye rack . it's pronounced more like eeee rack

🤝🏼

And similar to pretty much The United States and Brazil. Russia is not the only person who did this it seems lol.