Lawrence Krauss - The Future of Life in the Universe - Singularity Summit Australia 2011

  Рет қаралды 92,379

Science, Technology & the Future

Science, Technology & the Future

12 жыл бұрын

Videoed at the Singularity Summit Australia 2011: 2011.singularitysummit.com.au
Prof. Lawrence M. Krauss is an internationally known theoretical physicist with wide research interests, including the interface between elementary particle physics and cosmology, where his studies include the early universe, the nature of dark matter, general relativity and neutrino astrophysics. He has investigated questions ranging from the nature of exploding stars to issues of the origin of all mass in the universe. He was born in New York City and moved shortly thereafter to Toronto, Canada, where he grew up. He received undergraduate degrees in both Mathematics and Physics at Carleton University. He received his Ph.D. in Physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1982), then joined the Harvard Society of Fellows (1982-85). He joined the faculty of the departments of Physics and Astronomy at Yale University as assistant professor in 1985, and associate professor in 1988. In 1993 he was named the Ambrose Swasey Professor of Physics, Professor of Astronomy, and Chairman of the department of Physics at Case Western Reserve University. He served in the latter position for 12 years, until 2005. During this period he built up the department, which was ranked among the top 20 Physics Graduate Research Programs in the country in a 2005 national ranking. Among the major new initiatives he spearheaded are included the creation of one of the top particle astrophysics experimental and theoretical programs in the US, and the creation of a groundbreaking Masters Program in Physics Entrepreneurship. In 2002, he was named Director of the Center for Education and Research in Cosmology and Astrophysics at Case.

Пікірлер: 280
@Kristen70364
@Kristen70364 11 жыл бұрын
I'm only half way through the video, but I have to say: I love how he says things in scientific terms and then repeats them in layman terms. I'm sure that class understands all he's saying, but he still thinks of those of us who aren't scientifically inclined but still interested.
@Mrbfgray
@Mrbfgray 9 жыл бұрын
This is not only fascinating but Kraus at his most entertaining.
@dreamkid2
@dreamkid2 11 жыл бұрын
What a brilliant lecture. Thanks for filming it and if you are really listening to it, the quality doesn't matter in the slightest.
@jasonmaurella2
@jasonmaurella2 11 жыл бұрын
thanks for the recording bro
@IanAtkinson555
@IanAtkinson555 10 жыл бұрын
A slice of cosmology with Lawrence Krauss.
@designslave38
@designslave38 11 жыл бұрын
Thanks a BUNCH for posting this. Made my day.
@aamericuslakota
@aamericuslakota 11 жыл бұрын
Thanks for uploading. Nice to see Lawrence here in Melbourne, discussing a few concepts that aren't in usually in his lectures.
@MarceloDiCocco
@MarceloDiCocco 11 жыл бұрын
Simply amazing. I hardly noticed the camera ;D. Thank you.
@psb1964
@psb1964 11 жыл бұрын
Thank you for posting this.
@fatcat2939
@fatcat2939 11 жыл бұрын
What a great communicator Krauss is.
@betterdeadthanred4196
@betterdeadthanred4196 10 жыл бұрын
LAWRENCE you are genius, and thank you for being you!
@donluchitti
@donluchitti 11 жыл бұрын
thanks for the upload,I'm sure after you filmed this, you realized how much disservice you did to his speech by focusing in so hysterically and denying us his visual references. Khan Academny needs to team up with Krauss
@DannyJamesGuitar
@DannyJamesGuitar 11 жыл бұрын
Anyone know the name of the piano piece in the beginning?
@Ra3D
@Ra3D 11 жыл бұрын
Anyone know the name of the music playing at the beginning and end of this video? So relaxing
@lunarelf
@lunarelf 12 жыл бұрын
awesome talk, it would be great to have this guy as a teacher.
@DatAnonymousGuy
@DatAnonymousGuy 11 жыл бұрын
I really like this guy. He makes some very interesting points.
@gary031183
@gary031183 12 жыл бұрын
Yeah brother! I think many of them were there to hear jokes and not learn. This was an amazing lecture! I hope to go to one in the future!
@Muldoonite
@Muldoonite 11 жыл бұрын
What is the music that begins and ends this video? Thanks for uploading.
@NoActuallyGo-KCUF-Yourself
@NoActuallyGo-KCUF-Yourself 12 жыл бұрын
He's not making fun of either, he is remarking on how serendipitous scientific discoveries sometimes are. A large number of amazing discoveries happened by accident.
@maxmom6467
@maxmom6467 10 жыл бұрын
Great talk as always.
@gpop444
@gpop444 12 жыл бұрын
They say we know beauty so we can know the universe, if that's true this is one of the most beautiful lecture i have ever hurt in my life.
@akweo
@akweo 12 жыл бұрын
awesome ...this guy represents the human mind at it's best
@Sploige
@Sploige 11 жыл бұрын
Anyone know what the music at the start is? I think it may have been buried if people have asked before.
@salasvalor01
@salasvalor01 11 жыл бұрын
What Krauss emphasized at the end, pushing the fact consciousness is insignificant, makes me think of him as one of the most worthy living things of this world, because there is no arrogance in his existence. I hope Krauss and the others (three horsemen) have some plan in order to topple the politics we are so used to and trip the system into one run by Science. That would be the greatest thing life could have done for it.
@JVLdesign
@JVLdesign 11 жыл бұрын
The questions at the end were a pain in the ass, especially the design one
@chessician
@chessician 11 жыл бұрын
Agreed. Just because something is logical doesn't mean that it maps to reality. As far as quantum mechanics though, I think it's just fascinating how we're now discovering all these things. We may not be able to test some theories and hypotheses now, but I have no doubt that we will eventually develop better tools.
@DannieJensen
@DannieJensen 9 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video, but was this really the best spot you could possibly find for filming this? He keeps referring to images that I can't see :(
@Gilgaladt
@Gilgaladt 9 жыл бұрын
the part about Moores law is astounding. The Math doesn't seem complicated but the implication is huge.
@TheGildedStar
@TheGildedStar 11 жыл бұрын
Lol, every time I try to watch a new Lawrence Krauss video, it's always the same slides & info. I'm sure there's different information in each but it's hard to tell when I take time between watching em.
@scfu
@scfu 11 жыл бұрын
I have had trouble getting footage from someone who operated another camera that filmed the lecture. The original plan was that he would give me the footage, so hopefully I will at some stage have it.
@awsgames
@awsgames 11 жыл бұрын
hit the nail on the head, bud
@ConQuiX1
@ConQuiX1 11 жыл бұрын
According to Krauss (best I can figure) it boils down to an exceedingly rare quantum fluctuation where a separation of "positive" energy (matter-energy) from negative energy (dark energy and inflationary energy) occured. This caused the early universe to blow up like a balloon from what we'd otherwise call nothing. The vacuum of space has virtual particles popping in and out of existence all the time for no apparent reason. I think this is a type of symmetry breaking, like matter vs. antimatter.
@scfu
@scfu 11 жыл бұрын
Well, sorry - no one else complained. But yes, having Lawrence Krauss at the conf was kinda exciting. Some photos don't' turn out if not flash is used.
@ConQuiX1
@ConQuiX1 11 жыл бұрын
"... are among the strongest deductions ever made by man" The principle of causality (along with many other axiomatic principles of science) are often not deductions but "inductions" or based on inductive reasoning at the core. Entropy (the 2nd law) might be one of the few that could be said to be deductively true (though it paradoxically seems the most inductive at first inspection). There's a massive difference between deductive reason and inductive (or abductive also) reasoning methods.
@wassollderscheiss33
@wassollderscheiss33 10 жыл бұрын
Did you let the camera man live or did you kill him on the spot?
@scfu
@scfu 11 жыл бұрын
It was a camerawoman who it seems did not care as much as I thought before I agreed to have her do the filming. However, I do have other camera angles, one of which is still on tape somewhere. I just have to collect it- then perhaps I can edit a better version :)
@fiddleleaf
@fiddleleaf 11 жыл бұрын
The important part of this video is what Prof. Krauss is saying. If the video was audio only it would still be worth uploading so I'm not sure why you care so much about the camera.
@danchisholm1
@danchisholm1 10 жыл бұрын
Off topic, but the photos being snapped are driving me nuts.
@quagmire444
@quagmire444 11 жыл бұрын
You can't make confident conclusions about the future or past of the universe when the deduction alone resides on only that which you can observe in the present time. New observations always come to place, there are obviously many laws that govern the Universe we haven't discovered yet, which is why its very likely this prediction about the future of the Universe will change in a decade or so.
@plasmacoil1
@plasmacoil1 11 жыл бұрын
So I just want some clarification: 1. Have we concluded that our universe is a flat one? or is it open? 2. Trillions of years from now, when future civilizations will only be able to see their own galaxy, how will the universe end? Krauss hints at the end that it will eventually collapse on itself in a blackhole during the Q&A. Am i interpreting him correctly?
@danielrominov4037
@danielrominov4037 5 жыл бұрын
watching this in 2019
@Scanini
@Scanini 11 жыл бұрын
If space weighs something and it is expanding then the more space you get the more energy you get, it seems to be literally out of control, or maybe the expansion of space is being driven by a force we do not understand or comprehend, much like something falling faster and faster and an observer not understanding gravity then questioning why the object is falling faster and faster.
@TheWillIamLee87
@TheWillIamLee87 11 жыл бұрын
most of his talks found on youtube are just his talk designed to summarize his book "A Universe from Nothing". You can get more details by reading that and many of his other books.
@MewCat100
@MewCat100 11 жыл бұрын
Do you have evidence for the third theory?
@guwest2
@guwest2 12 жыл бұрын
thanks for this but you need a new cameraman who is able to include the entire presentation slide in the shot, not just the bottom half with the wall below it.
@johncockinhand8770
@johncockinhand8770 9 жыл бұрын
If he explains that some space can move quicker than the speed of light, therefore we cannot see an object in that particular area because space being accelerated or expanding too quick for the light. Then couldn't we assume dark matter is just particles moving quicker than we can see? as in that area of space is just accelerating quicker than light??? i am just a simpleton but doesn't that seem plausible?? Why can't dark matter be simply super accelerated particles that have weight?
@Adaerus
@Adaerus 11 жыл бұрын
If depression is the feeling left after seeing this speech it is evidence that your own view on life needs to be adjusted. 1: Just because we are insignificant at the cosmological scale, it is gives more value to on how important we are to each other. 2: The end of the universe as we know it is just a story based on evidence we have right now but I say anything about the things we don't know we don't which if discovered in the future could change this picture. 3: that end is too far away.
@AndrewBrownK
@AndrewBrownK 11 жыл бұрын
very neat presentation! i never knew we knew this much about dark energy! i verily want his book now... and the limit on moores law is so depressing! and the news we cant spawn baby universes! arg! but indeed this is a very exciting and special era, i am quite thankful for it
@omgtkseth
@omgtkseth 11 жыл бұрын
I cant blame the cameraman because obviously she was in the wrong spot. As an amateur photographer and filmographer, you cant be that close, with the both subjects being on opposite directions (Krauss and the screen), while using that focal length. If the screen had been in his background it would have made things easier, as well as being farther away. Its a shame because I really LOVE this conference, and have seen all the different versions of it, and this could have been the best.
@ConQuiX1
@ConQuiX1 11 жыл бұрын
Sure - but it's certainly possible that our traditional concept of cause and effect was over simplified due to our limitations of our senses and tools. Quantum mechanics clearly shows that our traditional notion of causality breaks down at those size and timescales (i.e. in the LHC). There's no agent popping up virtual particles, it's just how reality happens to work. There's still "causality" afterward, but at that small scale there are also lots of "uncaused" events happening all the time.
@skyblazer7
@skyblazer7 11 жыл бұрын
It's important to keep in mind that the unobservable expanding universe is still out there, even though we cannot see it. It's also possible that other bubble universes are out there in the unobservable void. If that is the case, I wonder if it's possible to use quantum entanglement to reach them. The unobservable universe WAS once entangled with where we are, so I think it should be possible if we ever devise a way to use quantum-entanglement for travel. This may forestall life's ultimate end.
@csdr0
@csdr0 11 жыл бұрын
Another scientist has that idea - Roger Penrose. The expansion of the Universe will either result, given enough time, to the eventual separation of all individual particles reducing the "visible universe of matter" to "nothing" (essentially empty space) or it might result to a "Bg Rip." Now "nothing" is not nothing ("what rocks dream about"). It is full of acitivity (vacuum fluctuations) that could cause another Big Bang.
@fictitiousarts
@fictitiousarts 11 жыл бұрын
Exactly. Now you're on to something.
@RedLionGenetics
@RedLionGenetics 11 жыл бұрын
Yes sleestacks are from Land of the Lost, i think your right. I didnt spend much time watching it, or Star Trek though :( But sleestack and sour alien are my favourite strains :D Thats the reasoning behind the pic sadly lol
@salasvalor01
@salasvalor01 11 жыл бұрын
I immediately favorited this before viewing- that's how highly I think about the Four Horsemen. By the way, I say Lawrence Krauss should be the fifth horseman.
@TheFifthGreatApe
@TheFifthGreatApe 12 жыл бұрын
The camera guy is listening to a lecture on singularities and quantum mechanics, but some how can't anticipate Krauss's pacing to pan the camera in time before he walks out of frame! Camera Tip: If one is more concerned with the lecture then the camera, go WS (wide shot)!
@Scanini
@Scanini 11 жыл бұрын
Why would you "hate" that? Thats like going to see a show repeatedly and saying "Why are they repeating what they said in the last show?!"
@darkesttendency
@darkesttendency 11 жыл бұрын
These limits may derive from limited advance in today's science as he stated as an answer to "baby universe" question at the end. He refuses to think about possibilities without any observational evidence. But one should think the integrity, capability of observation if the observer observes itself. We shouldn't lose that skepticism.
@chessician
@chessician 11 жыл бұрын
Yes, and even if physicists still can't fully explain this because it is so counter-intuitive, the calculations can't lie.
@andenandenia
@andenandenia 12 жыл бұрын
In the future, eatch person will live a universe life time. Visiting other stars eg.
@ConQuiX1
@ConQuiX1 11 жыл бұрын
To be fair - we don't know what happened in the first unit of planck time. There are a lot of aspects even after that point which are still hotly debated. What does appear to be the case (and Dr. Krauss has made a point of explaining this) is that the gravitationally repulsive negative dark energy and positive gravitative energy from particles and energy in the universe sums to zero. And this leaves open the possibility that our universe resulted from a rare quantum fluctuation...
@bobbyadage
@bobbyadage 11 жыл бұрын
hey look its spike from buffy at 2:13!
@RyanBurgett1
@RyanBurgett1 11 жыл бұрын
From what i have heard from him the universe is the saddle shape and it prolly will just expand into nothingness. His Inr2 lecture goes into both those questions in pretty great detail.
@frandeep
@frandeep 11 жыл бұрын
The camera shutter clicks are really annoying! You have enough photos of Lawrence Krauss talking! Ruined it for me. Did you really need that many photos of Lawrence Krauss talking?
@nylehaywood2471
@nylehaywood2471 4 жыл бұрын
YA
@JeffBedrick
@JeffBedrick 11 жыл бұрын
"We live in a very special time in which we can observe phenomena that will not be observable in 100K years." Nice, but this raises the question: What other phenomena and conditions are there in the universe that are NOT observable now? This is where we can only speculate.
@ConQuiX1
@ConQuiX1 11 жыл бұрын
Well... tbh, the calculations can't help but be logically consistent (what's why we all need and love math :D) but something being logically consistent doesn't mean it maps to reality. It's worth asking whether reality is logically consistent at its core though. I mean quantum is certainly counter intuitive, but it appears to follow certain rules and it's consistent (if weird). This is the problem with string theory that's usually brought up - it's logically consistent but we can't test it.
@DoggoWillink
@DoggoWillink 12 жыл бұрын
Yeah, the math is tough. Although, a lot of physics math isn't extremely hard math in itself, it's hard because of how physics works (with vectors, etc). You can do a lot of physics with basic integral and derivative knowledge. The problem is that physics isn't just regular math, its physics. You better be really good with vectors.
@petercraig3745
@petercraig3745 11 жыл бұрын
This comment has the most win I've ever seen on KZfaq.
@RedLionGenetics
@RedLionGenetics 11 жыл бұрын
Yes my bad. I didnt watch either but have since been corrected.
@thwasam
@thwasam 12 жыл бұрын
wow, I can't believe this video got only 5800 views.
@shishkabobby
@shishkabobby 11 жыл бұрын
But the Sleestak where from Land of the Lost!
@andrewcoursaris6801
@andrewcoursaris6801 11 жыл бұрын
very eccentric fellow
@jsb0321
@jsb0321 12 жыл бұрын
Well Maybe a bit. When they discovered the radiation, which really was a complete accident, a team at Princeton university was actually working on looking for it. Their telescopes were not good enough so Penzias and Wilson discovered it at Bell Labs instead when they were testing a new antenna.
@DoggoWillink
@DoggoWillink 12 жыл бұрын
@NASAChiefScientist Not to be a douche, but gravity is the result of the curvature of space-time itself, so technically gravity doesn't bend space-time, but rather bent space-time "creates" what we call gravity; and mass bends space-time. Just semantics though, doesn't affect the point you were making about gravitational lensing. I very much agree, it's very interesting.
@indoguju
@indoguju 12 жыл бұрын
What a genuis...
@bartsimpson2068
@bartsimpson2068 10 жыл бұрын
he means the guy with the flash photography
@grindupBaker
@grindupBaker 11 жыл бұрын
He only has the one video. You keep watching it in alternate universes.
@kunschner
@kunschner 11 жыл бұрын
Yes, really.
@evhantheinfidel
@evhantheinfidel 11 жыл бұрын
First of all, in the current picture, it looks like the universe wouldn't "go back to nothing". Secondly, if the universe does somehow end, life would too. Even if life arose once more, it would have ended. His logic is not terrible.
@BradWatsonMiami
@BradWatsonMiami 11 жыл бұрын
This universe's Big Bang (supermassive white hole) was the result of a supermassive black hole in another universe: this universe and that SBH share the same event horizon. This duality combines these two singularities in a birth-life-death-rebirth relationship within The Conglomerate of nonparallel-universes. This 'simple' cause-and-effect explains both infinite space and infinite time (eternity). Self-replication is the simplest design for everything from a cell to a universe to a mind.
@indoguju
@indoguju 12 жыл бұрын
Yeh some tips on the camera work.. don't zoom in to much..
@JungleJargon
@JungleJargon 11 жыл бұрын
"Singularity" is = - Obey us instead of your Maker. -
@ansalem12
@ansalem12 11 жыл бұрын
Finite means, in the simplest terms, countable. It doesn't matter how large the number is, if you can give a number then it is finite. The number 243,673,211,676,897,974,934,246,276,892 is finite. How exactly is it pompous to use the correct term? It certainly isn't an infinite number, and there are only two choices, so you're suggesting that he not call it anything at all which would be dishonest. Even if it's pompous somehow, I prefer pompous to lying.
@Mujtabahassan1
@Mujtabahassan1 11 жыл бұрын
i am sure the cameraman is drifted away by the lecture
@JeffBedrick
@JeffBedrick 11 жыл бұрын
Not to nitpick or anything, but Sleestacks are from Land of the Lost, not Star Trek. Otherwise, agree about atheism.
@kousoulides
@kousoulides 11 жыл бұрын
he is the Woody Allen of physics!
@bernardbuela420
@bernardbuela420 11 жыл бұрын
The fact that man can understand is proof enough of intelligence. It seems here that the overload of scientific concepts, theories and principles has blurred clear thinking, ending up in some skeptic/cynic view of life and existence. What appears clear to me is that human understanding transcends the physical sciences, i.e., it's not space and time although within them - the consciousness. Causality is causality and is not a plausibility. That there's an Uncaused cause still stands out.
@PifflePrattle
@PifflePrattle 12 жыл бұрын
49:10 ha!
@spaveevo
@spaveevo 11 жыл бұрын
we are what we study....or is it we are what we eat?
@silkgandalf
@silkgandalf 12 жыл бұрын
I just don't think (or wish?) that in Europe you would have that kind of question...
@scfu
@scfu 11 жыл бұрын
Better yet, here is the Nick Bostrom playlist where he talks about the Simulation Argument: .youtube dot com/playlist?list=PL-7qI6NZpO3u6wv29SklMC03V5jTdzWs9
@Gilgaladt
@Gilgaladt 9 жыл бұрын
I find it ridiculous that there is almost no discussion about the topics Krauss adressed (I found the part about Moore's law fascinating). Krass talked about the future of life in the universe and information processing etc etv but all i see in the comments is the same silly discussions about God and infinite regression of causality bla bla bla, THAT WAS NOT THE TOPIC
@amcmr2003
@amcmr2003 10 жыл бұрын
heh, then I guess I'm even less of a lesser man, Mr. Krauss.(if you ever read this) Since I've not only got a solution to decreasing complexity but I've found it right on your own later arguments. =)
@scfu
@scfu 11 жыл бұрын
Have a look at the Simulation Argument by Nick Bostrom. This video, and others like it on my channel: youtube dot com/watch?v=SIR8zc2uWNg
@anthroparion
@anthroparion 11 жыл бұрын
Religion doesn't rely on evidence or experiment, only belief and faith. So they may not be mutually exclusive, but they are two ends of a very vey long pole
@fusorman
@fusorman 11 жыл бұрын
It's far more intriguing that the earth is flat, the sun orbits the earth, and the earth is the center of the universe. And obvious.
@doodelay
@doodelay 11 жыл бұрын
I'm an atheist too but doesn't the absence of god = material/natural universe? I mean...how can u not believe in god but still fear spirits?
@d8d810
@d8d810 10 жыл бұрын
1. If we can harness Dark Matter and Dark Energy then we can stop this effect. 2. If we can create 2 universe from nothing one anti-matter and the other Matter then we could live forever 3. If technology got infinitely smaller then it would not use up the universe. 4. You said you can go faster then light because the other galaxies are going to be moving faster then light away from us. there for we will be able to get to these other galaxies even thou we can't see them anymore. 5. What make us so sure that this isn't the case with the 13.2 billion light years of seeable galaxies. Maybe it goes on infantry but they are just moving faster then light away form us.
@superhamzah85
@superhamzah85 12 жыл бұрын
Damn it I can only live for a few trillion years? I was expecting eternity, we need to find a way to tunnel into a twin universe in an early state. This is depressing :-(
Neil Turok Public Lecture: The Astonishing Simplicity of Everything
1:39:14
Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
Рет қаралды 4,6 МЛН
Why Neil Turok Believes Physics Is In Crisis (262)
2:13:57
Dr Brian Keating
Рет қаралды 375 М.
That's how money comes into our family
00:14
Mamasoboliha
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
Clown takes blame for missing candy 🍬🤣 #shorts
00:49
Yoeslan
Рет қаралды 29 МЛН
Double Stacked Pizza @Lionfield @ChefRush
00:33
albert_cancook
Рет қаралды 55 МЛН
When galaxies were born - with Richard Ellis
55:56
The Royal Institution
Рет қаралды 82 М.
Why is Time a One-Way Street?
1:13:39
Santa Fe Institute
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
COSMOLOGY At The Frontier, Dr. Brian Greene, Columbia University
1:43:57
Linus Pauling Memorial Lecture Series
Рет қаралды 81 М.
Secrets of the Universe: Neil Turok Public Lecture
1:24:59
Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
Рет қаралды 307 М.
2013 Isaac Asimov Memorial Debate: The Existence of Nothing
1:54:00
American Museum of Natural History
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
Lawrence M. Krauss || A Universe from Nothing || Radcliffe Institute
1:16:37
Harvard University
Рет қаралды 360 М.
Hidden Realities: Parallel Universes and the Deep Laws of the Cosmos, Dr. Brian Greene, Columbia
1:32:01
Linus Pauling Memorial Lecture Series
Рет қаралды 275 М.
Dr. Neil Turok - "From zero to infinity, and beyond!"
1:12:59
McMaster Alumni
Рет қаралды 156 М.
Красиво, но телефон жаль
0:32
Бесполезные Новости
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
Klavye İle Trafik Işığını Yönetmek #shorts
0:18
Osman Kabadayı
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
Сколько реально стоит ПК Величайшего?
0:37
😱Хакер взломал зашифрованный ноутбук.
0:54
Последний Оплот Безопасности
Рет қаралды 925 М.
Как удвоить напряжение? #электроника #умножитель
1:00
Hi Dev! – Электроника
Рет қаралды 889 М.