Audit the Audit hello, is there a possibility u can upload two vids a week? quarantine hittin hard n ur vids are addictive n educational. We would love to help you find more content if needed, but it feels like weeks go by too slow I barely see content from you. But its your channel and i thank you for ur contribution and advice

I would respectfully disagree with your assertion that the law states one must immediately stop. I understand that the case law leans in this direction (at least in fla), but finding a better location has been used (not sure what states) as a successful defense from fleeing charges. The subject also did a pretty good job at communicating that decision. I have never spoken in your comments section b4 because i primarily come to learn legal interpretation, and i rarely disagree with your assertions. I love this channel, thanks for all your hard work and research.

Hey ATA!!! Unconstitutional mask mandates....GO!!!

“ *Those who are capable of tyranny are capable of perjury to sustain it* .” “... *only those who have the will and the power to shoot down their fellow men, are the real rulers in this, as in all other (so-called) civilized countries; for by no others will civilized men be robbed, or enslaved* .” ― Lysander Spooner, No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority *"So these villains, who call themselves governments, well understand that their power rests primarily upon stolen money* . *With money they can hire soldiers, and with soldiers extort money* . *And, when their authority is denied, the first use they always make of money, is to hire soldiers to kill or subdue all who refuse them more money* ." *-The payment of taxes, being compulsory, of course furnishes no evidence that any one voluntarily supports the Constitution* . *It is true that the theory of our Constitution is, that all taxes are paid voluntarily; that our government is a mutual insurance company, voluntarily entered into by the people with each other; that each man makes a free and purely voluntary contract with all others who are parties to the Constitution, to pay so much money for so much protection, the same as he does with any other insurance company; and that he is just as free not to be protected, and not to pay any tax, as he is to pay a tax, and be protected* . *But this theory of our government is wholly different from the practical fact* . *The fact is that the government, like a highwayman, says to a man: Your money, or your life* . *And many, if not most, taxes are paid under the compulsion of that threat* ;. *The government does not, indeed, waylay a man in a lonely place, spring upon him from the road side, and, holding a pistol to his head, proceed to rifle his pockets* . *But the robbery is none the less a robbery on that account; and it is far more dastardly and shameful* . *The highwayman takes solely upon himself the responsibility, danger, and crime of his own act* . *He does not pretend that he has any rightful claim to your money, or that he intends to use it for your own benefit* . *He does not pretend to be anything but a robber* . *He has not acquired impudence enough to profess to be merely a “protector,” and that he takes men’s money against their will, merely to enable him to “protect” those infatuated travellers, who feel perfectly able to protect themselves, or do not appreciate his peculiar system of protection* . *He is too sensible a man to make such professions as these* . *Furthermore, having taken your money, he leaves you, as you wish him to do* . *He does not persist in following you on the road, against your will; assuming to be your rightful “sovereign,” on account of the “protection” he affords you* . *He does not keep “protecting” you, by commanding you to bow down and serve him; by requiring you to do this, and forbidding you to do that; by robbing you of more money as often as he finds it for his interest or pleasure to do so; and by branding you as a rebel, a traitor, and an enemy to your country, and shooting you down without mercy, if you dispute his authority, or resist his demands* . *He is too much of a gentleman to be guilty of such impostures, and insults, and villanies as these* . *In short, he does not, in addition to robbing you, attempt to make you either his dupe or his slave* . *The proceedings of those robbers and murderers, who call themselves “the government,” are directly the opposite of these of the single highwayman* . *In the first place, they do not, like him, make themselves individually known; or, consequently, take upon themselves personally the responsibility of their acts* . *On the contrary, they secretly (by secret ballot) designate some one of their number to commit the robbery in their behalf, while they keep themselves practically concealed* . *They say to the person thus designated:* *Go to A- B-, and say to him that “the government” has need of money to meet the expenses of protecting him and his property* . *If he presumes to say that he has never contracted with us to protect him, and that he wants none of our protection, say to him that that is our business, and not his; that we choose to protect him, whether he desires us to do so or not; and that we demand pay, too, for protecting him* . *If he dares to inquire who the individuals are, who have thus taken upon themselves the title of “the government,” and who assume to protect him, and demand payment of him, without his having ever made any contract with them, say to him that that, too, is our business, and not his; that we do not choose to make ourselves individually known to him; that we have secretly (by secret ballot) appointed you our agent to give him notice of our demands, and, if he complies with them, to give him, in our name, a receipt that will protect him against any similar demand for the present year* . *If he refuses to comply, seize and sell enough of his property to pay not only our demands, but all your own expenses and trouble beside* . *If he resists the seizure of his property, call upon the bystanders to help you (doubtless some of them will prove to be members of our band)* . *If, in defending his property, he should kill any of our band who are assisting you, capture him at all hazards; charge him (in one of our courts) with murder, convict him, and hang him* . *If he should call upon his neighbors, or any others who, like him, may be disposed to resist our demands, and they should come in large numbers to his assistance, cry out that they are all rebels and traitors; that “our country” is in danger; call upon the commander of our hired murderers; tell him to quell the rebellion and “save the country,” cost what it may* . *Tell him to kill all who resist, though they should be hundreds of thousands; and thus strike terror into all others similarly disposed* . *See that the work of murder is thoroughly done, that we may have no further trouble of this kind hereafter* . *When these traitors shall have thus been taught our strength and our determination, they will be good loyal citizens for many years, and pay their taxes without a why or a wherefore* . *It is under such compulsion as this that taxes, so called, are paid* . *And how much proof the payment of taxes affords, that the people consent to support “the government,” it needs no further argument to show* . *Lysander Spooner (1870)*

*"formerly we suffered from criminals and their crimes, now we suffer from laws and their coward costumed rapist, thug coproach "enforcers"* ..." -

You can't make this stuff up

So many people wouldn't believe it if it wasn't captured on video

If you don’t pull over right way, of course they would pull a gun on you. They don’t know why you’re fleeing. You could be an armed felon. The cop tells him the reason for pulling him over which is what he’s supposed to do. You sound very uneducated.

@@changsterville And you sound like a jackboot thug ..Go live in NJ..You would change your perspective fast.

@@changsterville That's stupid there is no law that says you have to pull over immediately. You are allowed to drive to a place that you aren't obstructing traffic and feel safe. People like you making excuses for bad policing are the reason bad police continues to exist.

You noticed that too? That car was is great condition for as old as it was. I mean dressing that snazzy, gotta have a ride to look good in too.

Lol

Lol

Lol

😂

Just watch other clips of cops crying over dead officer that’s always soothing and healing lol. Hating them isn’t a crime yet.

Same but I think everyone should be watching and learning about the huge problem in the US. Also, at first glance at your name I thought it was Mia Khalifa 😂

Same. I realized I have to pace myself and quit when I feel it starting to make my insides heat up.

​@@operationlull3742 do you realize how fucked up that is!? Those video's ARE PEOPLE it's not even the same cops from the videos you hate so much! Who the hell raised you to believe it's ok too watch someone mourn AS ENTERTAINMENT! I honestly don't even know what else to say... Do better...

@@JacobJones2148 lol no amount of mockery or laughing at these pigs would equalize the amount of power they have and all the injustices done by these pigs who CHOOSE to be part of a violent enforcement job for the ruling class. Calm down even if I hate these pigs and this country it won’t have an impact on the lives they ruin or the people they beat, kill and rob.

No, he pulled a gun because the guy wasn't stopping. Not because of the seatbelt.

@@vvrathhps You are right that it wasn't the seat belt, but if driving a couple of unnecessary blocks gets an officer that teed up, I have a few questions about the officers fitness for duty.

🤣

The cop wanted to kill Mr. Black…it was painfully apparent!!

Hey either individual with vision or inability to process thought issues, he pulled the gun because the motorist kept driving for 1 minute with blue lights on. If 1 minute is too much time is disputable but that is the reason... I dont expect you to understand that concept but I do expect you to seek out help.

My thoughts when watching this

You never stopped immediately thats is why

@@punchigames1965 so he did stop. Right?

@@punchigames1965 words matter it’s always amazing how when a person says it everyone’s like well he admitted to it. When a cop says something (well you understood what he meant)

I wonder how many Mississippi’s you have to count before it’s fleeing?? I mean, ONE MINUTE gets you a gun to your face! God forbid he turn a corner!

This is ultimately rooted in the fact that almost anyone might be carrying a gun. Cops wouldn't need to be so fearful if we had sensible gun laws.

@@fdm2155 facts

You would too after a few were pointed at YOU/ fired when you stop them

​@FDM 215 2nd amendment is reasonable. Everyone has the right to carry. Government shall not infringe on that right.

@@wb1291 The only time a cop should unholster their gun is when there is an imminent lethal threat. The only time they should point their gun at another human being is right before they pull the trigger. The amount of times I've seen US cops pointing their guns at other people willy nilly, when there was no reasonable threat, much less an imminent lethal threat is crazy. There is no excuse for it. If a cop is at the point where they're so terrified from prior experiences that they start pulling out their gun and pointing it at people at unreasonable times, they need to have their badge taken.

Dude Jesus Christ, so sorry that happened to you. Glad you got that settlement though

Ironic right! These psychopaths just don’t see their hypocrisy

The officer tried for over a min to get the guy stop and he didn't. The officer had the gun out incase he tired to get away or attack him

@@MTFL007 It's far easier to judge the officer negatively after the incident. However, as you said, in the moment the unidentified driver was "fleeing" from the police. Fleeing isn't something an innocent person does. That is why the officer expected the worse. i.e. he wouldn't be having dinner with his wife and kids.

Jason G right. Just another example of a video edited which shows the viewer no context; or better yet, edited in a way to better push the narrative they’re wanting. Smh

May we politely suggest the following de-escalation for remedy? THE TRUST IS COLLAPSED....in other words, your company is no longer granting them any more credit. If the policeman is not lawfully investigating the crime on behalf of the male/female victim and is entering YOUR company jurisdiction without you summonsing them, then would it not be advisable to be politely placing YOUR public-servants/trustees under your notification that your company is charging $707 per hour/part-there-of for YOUR company time and also $717 for YOUR company performance?....and that any further communicating (verbal) and/ or corresponding (written) with your company, is with them accepting the terms & conditions of the commercial contract IN THE PRIVATE (the cop and their CHIEF and their POLICE UNION is now with PERSONAL liability.... because Notice-to-Agent-is-Notice-to-Principal....and also through JOINDER....and they also lose their qualified immunity) This way, you are NOT resisting/refusing to obey/comply with their orders/demands/policy /questions, but instead, you are now willing to perform WITH THE CONDITION that payment is with your company immediately, because you have NO CONFIDENCE with them administrating YOUR company trust! THE PUBLIC TRUST IS COLLAPSED...Why is YOUR company issuing them extra credit! Are YOU not the executor and the beneficiary of YOUR trust?...making them the trustees, whom are with their fiduciary obligation and duty-of-care to be NOT causing you injury nor damage nor loss nor harm. Is THEIR job YOUR job? Is THEIR company policy YOUR company policy? not unless and until they are PAYING for your company time & performance THE CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST IS COLLAPSED...YOUR company is no longer performing free-of-charge! You may be willing to pursue the matter through the small-claims-court and/or through arbitration which is held in-the-private because PUBLIC court is only for the PUBLIC servant. YOUR TRUST FUND IS NOW WITH RESTORATION....YOUR company is now making money from every encounter with YOUR public-servants because the days of doing something with your trustees for free are over. PS-Be the BUSINESS man with the public-servants.......NOT the victim.

And this KZfaq channel gave the cop a B? Cop is a F!

That’s how stupid these people are

The reason they stopped him is Pensacola has to pay for a new jail after they blew the last 1 up with and electric fan placed in the doorway of a natural gas leak.

Shit imagine if he was speeding

Pulled out a gun and detained because he fled from a police officer. The police officer had no idea who the driver was or whether the driver had a weapon stashed within reach of the driver's seat. Innocent people do NOT flee from the police.

I pray dufour gets it back in spades ... him and the families who trained him to be a RACIST and who joyfully encouraged his behavior. May KARMA strike those he cares about!!

Word are just semantics, you can’t base how someone reacts based on words

​@@ellareece4172I don't think the officer was racist he never said anything along the lines of white power.

@@rivernunly1764that’s not the only racism

@@zThaRipper7 you are correct but my argument is when did he say something racist or trying to do anything that "proved" racial superiority

Wrong. Police have to deduce your future actions by the actions alread witnessed and they do this with great caution for their own safety. It happens quite often that cops get shot at by people who have no reason and the cops know that. So if somebody does not pull over it can mean that they are trying to get away - that can indicate that they might be up to no good. A cop cannot read your mind. Follow the instructions.

That's not the law...@@spackomcspack7103

@@juanld87 yeah. @SpackoMcSpack is most likely a cop. They always act like their inept training supersedes law. I wrote my response in a way that the avg low IQ cop won’t understand.

So true deb, most citizens need to know that cops are just REGULAR men and women off the streets put on the force with no type of training and nor type of understanding of the basic laws. That is why we see so many videos on yt because it seems the chief in every department in every state don't give a chit about their tyrants knowing the law and just rather have them go wild on innocent citizens as in beat, harass, intimidate and be overly agressive. 🤷🏼‍♂️

@@spackomcspack7103 Quit sucking the blue kool aid.

In Virginia, a driver cannot be pulled over for not wearing a seatbelt. If the driver is not wearing a seatbelt while pulled over for an actual infraction, the seatbelt issue can become a citation.

Failing to wear a seat belt, when it is required by law, is reason for a stop. Turn in your KZfaq law degree, you failed.

It's for your own safety.😉 But our children's (the future) buses and city buses don't have seatbelts. You right. A way to generate revenue

@Robert Slackware L.O.L.

Depends on the state. In PA, they must pull you over for a different reason

RIGHT😹🤣😂

The PTSD is REAL!! He should be suing for $2million minimum!!

100% TRUTH!!! Thank you for posting that.

YOU ARE SO RIGHT!!! I can't imagine just being a young black man in the US - never mind that they are a profiled target. This poor, dear young man. Terrified to begin with and then treated as less than human. I cannot pray long enough, hard enough or loud enough for physical retribution for his sake against this vile thing.

Good for him

Scared for what? Cops were 100% in the right. He should get the ticket for the seat belt and be charged with felony evading.

@@XH442 lmao look, a bootlicker

@@XH442 instead he got an apology with a $200,000 tip. 😮‍💨

@@factsbykidd4765 You can sue for anything doesn't mean he will win. Felony evading is what it's called when you refuse to pull over for police. GL on him getting a dime.

Maybe by counselor, the cop thought he meant lawyer?

I was hoping that he was a lawyer.

Reminds me of City Slickers: "Yesssss... we're black, AND we're dentists."

@@Fister_of_Muppets ? 🤔

Cop probably thought that "conselor" meant that Mr. Black was an attorney.

Exactly.

They could see in it anyways, why didnt he explain why he wasnt comfortable stopping?? Weird

@@andrewchapman5659 I would say he was stressed out and could not think clearly, but this small detail doesn’t take away from the situation as a whole, I think this is troubling. But I do agree, it may have helped but so don’t think these officers really cared

He's at work.

Florida is the state where the cop was caught planting evidence.

@@andrewchapman5659 he did explain if you watched. He said he wanted to stop at a place he felt comfortable and safe

I love that story, except for the not apologizing part....

Boom! Ownage. Good job. Waiting for him to bury himself before revealing what REALLY happened.

I just wouldn't mention the dash cam until after he has stood up in Court and sworn on oath that you were not wearing a seat belt. You saved his bacon by telling him about it and he really didn't deserve the favor.

@@c2757 agreed. That would have been awesome lol

Post that if you have it! Put the link in a reply??? :)

Do you think that might possibly have to do with the level of violent crime and the difference between those two communities in that regard?

gun pulled for fleeing, not seatbelt.

@@DaveDepilot-KFRG 🤣🤣 There is actually something wrong with you.

Be very careful in giving a badge and a gun to somebody who can take your life "legally".

@@DaveDepilot-KFRG 👅 🥾

Pigs will be pigs.

F is cops grade. The city get an F too. Racist cops. Racist Laws.

Yep this guy grads 2 high for the cops. Way 2 high

Audit the audit frequently rates police way too high when they have violated rights like crazy.

Uh… the person refused to stop… that’s not normal…. You people are dumb af really. Totally biased…

you would too if you just pulled a guy over after he didn't stop for the past 5 minutes.

Read the beginning of the article , he fled the seen.

@@patdalager2598 did you not watch the video?

@@QuasiRandomViewer the cop said he drove for 1 minute. The narrator was talking about a different case in which someone drove for 5 minutes.

@@baileywilliams5419 Oops, 5 minutes was from the 7:26 discussion of State vs. Kirer. At 0:53 we are indeed told "Mr. Black continued driving for approximately one minute before pulling over." Thanks for the correction!

@@QuasiRandomViewer yeah its np 👍

Exactly...

So funny as that's exactly what they expect and they get really pissed when you don't acknowledge their authority.

Ironically the video shows the man removing his seatbelt.

On the money

You hit the nail on the head!!!!

plus he was at work! lil feller was nervous too

Mr. Black keep driving for 5 minutes after the sirens is on. There are 5 minute windows to put seatbelt on. Edit: 1 minutes

@@goodking9799 1 minute

@@goodking9799 in the United States of America, in order to prove someone is guilty, you must have evidence of wrongdoing or a crime occurring. We are not required to prove our innocence to the police and courts. It is their jobs to gather proof and true testimony to prove any one of us guilty of their accusations.

@@goodking9799 you can’t even edit a comment right😂

@@goodking9799 *kept *minute *his *were *were *his

*Understandable, have a nice day.*

@@manuelpatterson8002 That would be the case if the police operated under the law they are supposed to uphold.

Not funny bro

@@jamiewashington1053 it is funny😂😂😂

☠️

I thought the same thing when he said that. I really wanted Mr. Black to say "if I never stopped, how are we talking?"

😂🤣😅🤣🤣😂

Same here. You know how police have different definitions for words everyone uses.

I had a state cop threaten to have my car towed for running from them....bear in mind I was pulled over by a city cop at the time. You can imagine how well they took it when I pointed out we wouldn’t be talking if I had ran from them. Naturally I was being “hostile” which became reasonable suspicion to search my car.

Because he isn't having a pedantic argument with an anonymous Internet commenter. He's in police custody after not pulling over for quite a long while. Snarky comments will only harm his cause.

Yeah he reached to unfasten it , you can hear the seatbelt retracting

I did!

it's possible that he fastened the seatbelt after the sirens

@@nonetheless11 lol even if that is true. There is no evidence of that so it's pointless. The law does not and should not work based on assumption.

That’s going to be a disputed fact in the Section 1983 action. It is possible that he was wearing it the entire time and it it is also possible that he buckled it after he saw the sirens. That it is disputed generally helps the reasonable suspicion for the stop to not qualify for a determination of qualified immunity on that particular cause of action (4th Amendment Detainment). However the fleeing statute kind of raises the possibility of qualified immunity or even simply a dismissal on that cause of action since the officer then had reasonable suspicion for the stop and as the statute and litigation of the statute is described in this video that’s going difficult for the plaintiff to challenge a qualified immunity defense. The search of the vehicle is more problematic. Personally I think they should have ticketed him for fleeing and impounded the car and gotten his documents during the inventory. I think the search is the only thing that will survive summary judgment in the sense that was most likely an unlawful search. I apologize if that’s TMI.

I had a cop imply I was possibly reaching for a weapon when I TOLD them I was reaching for my ID after they asked me to. Almost like the entire system is setup to make sure the average person loses.

you can't say every cop is bad you can cherry pick but your point is invalid

it is their job to intimidate

Remember these people are former slaves . Remember the USA police culture was born out of slave catching !

@@secretmessage9130 True not every cop But 99% of the pigs are unbelievably below average intelligence, and rotten to core

Dude. Watch Brazilian cops and then you can write that comment lol

That is not why the weapon was drawn. It was drawn because the motorist did not immediately stop as required by law, and was therefore fleeing, which is a felony in Florida. Standard procedure for a felony stop is to approach with weapon drawn.

Wow he read him his rights on a seat belt violation

You have a right to stop at a safe location. The fact that this man is black is why the pig drew his gun

Police are waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more likely to get shot at by black men than any other demographic.

@@riner9 bullshit

He fled from the police according to the letter of the law.

Same!

@@HarrDarr anti-coppers mad

An F is too good, F minus.

In Australia we would be shocked by such police behaviour and the cop would lose his job. I know this because it happened in my state recently. It's on KZfaq. Then again, we don't have a gun culture.

the seatbelt is the fake concern excuse the real concern is for "officer safety" so we see a gun, handcuffs and confrontational cop attitude.

That's their dirty excuses 😤 always

Lord Tony Did you watch the video? The gun and handcuffs were for trying to elude the cop - not the seatbelt infraction. In they end they let him off for the eluding charge although under Florida law they could have charged him because it states he must stop immediately.

@@karagi101- I'll have to remember that "immediately" part. The instant the lights and siren go on I'm stomping that brake pedal to the firewall. The car may refuse to stop immediately, skidding a few yards, so I guess I'll get a gun brandished at me anyway.

Al Grayson Yeah, the narrator did point out it’s a stupid Florida law but Florida’s courts have upheld that immediate means stop now (braking distance doesn’t count).

May we politely suggest the following de-escalation for remedy? THE TRUST IS COLLAPSED....in other words, your company is no longer granting them any more credit. If the policeman is not lawfully investigating the crime on behalf of the male/female victim and is entering YOUR company jurisdiction without you summonsing them, then would it not be advisable to be politely placing YOUR public-servants/trustees under your notification that your company is charging $707 per hour/part-there-of for YOUR company time and also $717 for YOUR company performance?....and that any further communicating (verbal) and/ or corresponding (written) with your company, is with them accepting the terms & conditions of the commercial contract IN THE PRIVATE (the cop and their CHIEF and their POLICE UNION is now with PERSONAL liability.... because Notice-to-Agent-is-Notice-to-Principal....and also through JOINDER....and they also lose their qualified immunity) This way, you are NOT resisting/refusing to obey/comply with their orders/demands/policy /questions, but instead, you are now willing to perform WITH THE CONDITION that payment is with your company immediately, because you have NO CONFIDENCE with them administrating YOUR company trust! THE PUBLIC TRUST IS COLLAPSED...Why is YOUR company issuing them extra credit! Are YOU not the executor and the beneficiary of YOUR trust?...making them the trustees, whom are with their fiduciary obligation and duty-of-care to be NOT causing you injury nor damage nor loss nor harm. Is THEIR job YOUR job? Is THEIR company policy YOUR company policy? not unless and until they are PAYING for your company time & performance THE CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST IS COLLAPSED...YOUR company is no longer performing free-of-charge! You may be willing to pursue the matter through the small-claims-court and/or through arbitration which is held in-the-private because PUBLIC court is only for the PUBLIC servant. YOUR TRUST FUND IS NOW WITH RESTORATION....YOUR company is now making money from every encounter with YOUR public-servants because the days of doing something with your trustees for free are over. PS-Be the BUSINESS man with the public-servants.....NOT the victim. Please be directing your city/county council by letter to implement immediate police cut-backs because of the appalling waste of resources.

@@mccabeianenator look at countries without police or corrupt police. notice they're all ran by the mafia. do you want that where you live? back in late 80 and early 90's it was ran by gangs. look at the police change that happened to put the gangs in hiding.

@@jetah50 the mafia doesn't randomly pull over and harass innocent people for no reason.

@@andrewroberts1123 instead they harass shop owners, and local businesses.

@@mccabeianenator [The masses are not ready for the truth @mccabeianenator.]

He could have put it on after he saw the cop trying to pull him over. Not saying that’s what happened, just saying lots of people do that.

Stands for B. Itch

if the cop chose to do his initial action and did not call his supervisor he would have been given a D+ most likely. Sometimes just a single action can save a persons career.

​​@@pauls4522 I think ur right he should get a D+ the+ should be at least 9" or more

If he just left a client, he could be one of those put it on while ya start driving type of people.

He was so disappointed on that police officer

He saw first hand the evils committed by police many had tried to convince him of that he refused to believe. That cop made a believer out of him.

Yes, and then he dealt well with the cops. He not only asserted his rights, he convinced multiple officers that his delay in pulling over was based on legitimate concerns. That takes iron will. He is the example I look up to.

What are you- an ophthalmologist?

He’s probably a very compassionate man because of his chosen profession. It’s time that we peasants do something more than just complain about these pigs.

You must be thick…. While not stopping, he could have been loading a gun… there are lots of videos of traffic stops where people open fire on the cops.

@@lumpenomewr I've heard better arguements from dying fish, come back when you've got more IQ points then teeth

@@lumpenomewr it’s takes like 3 seconds to load a gun. He could have stopped straight away and still had time to load it

@@lumpenomewr He won his case

​@@lumpenomewr "I'm getting pulled over, better load my gun for the next 60 seconds."(sarcasm)

This is what I mean about Florida Police Officer's. They are very Corrupt.

Same thing happen to me in SOBE ( south bch ) in Miami . The lit me up on 7th and Ocean drive and was surprise that I did not "pull" over immediately. Anybody who does not know ocean drive, your not pulling over anywhere with a big truck on ocean drive at a 8pm Saturday night. I had 7 cop respond by cars, bike and on foot. ;(

The guy drove for at least a whole minute before stopping. If it is unsafe to stop there, the police officer has a PA and can instruct you to pull into the next parking lot/side street. Fleeing, by definition, is moving away from someone or something. So if you are signaled by police, signal your turn and slow to a stop within 200 ft.

Low IQ cop.

He wanted him to say unemployed

He wanted him to say he's a drop out who sells weak ass weed.

Right, “you’re more productive than me?”

@@manuelpatterson8002 lol

The way I the guy is talking, I was surprised to. The dude said "I'm at work" like 100 times. Came off like he was on drugs.

If i was a cop and asked someone to pull over and they proceeded for another 1 minuet to a street, I'd be expecting to be ambushed.

@@-JonnyBoy- So, you'd stop _immediately,_ regardless of _where_ you were, even if that meant stopping on the roadway (there isn't always a shoulder or other good place to pull "over").

I drove for 60 seconds while the cops tried to pull me over to get to a safer spot since we were in rush hour traffic on the main road. I actually had 3 of them by the time I made it to where I stopped. I at least slowed down and used my hazard lights to acknowledge the cops. I also didn't try opening my door like this idiot driver, I rolled down my windows, and I kept my hands on the wheel so the officers could see them. The cop was pissed at me for continuing to drive but let me go with a warning since I did everything else right.

@@-JonnyBoy- Not to mention he tried opening his door immediately after stopping.

I've seen no statute that suggests you must only pull over once you personally feel safe to do so. It would be unreasonable to write that into a statute, too. Every person fleeing/eluding would attempt that defense, but that's not even the main issue with it. The main issue is that the court cannot reasonably measure whether you felt safe. They could measure whether a reasonable person would feel safe potentially, but that still likely wouldn't absolve Mr. Black of what he did. I'm saying this as someone who, at least morally speaking, finds it justifiable what Mr. Black did, according to his own reasoning.

You can tell he is a good counselor. Much respect

He was too calm

He voice was shaky

👏👏👏

Unfortunately he's probably experienced it before.

🤦🏾‍♂️

Exactly what I noticed. That should make the stop invalid.

Yet he gave him a b!🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️

yea that minute that he was driving before he actually pulled over, that was him putting on his seat belt. Jeez every black person now that gets pulled over can just pull the race card. I was pulled over recently by a spanish cop and he gave me a seatbelt ticket. Was he being racist? Do i get to sue him court because he was a different race than me?? Holy christ the stupidity today.

@@stus2159 literally the most stupid comment I’ve ever read in this entire comment thread of this video.

If the driver started opening the door without being told to do so then it was totally justified. We'll never know since the audio didn't start until after he started opening the door. Had he sat in his seat with his hands at 10&2 on the steering wheel then this probably would have been a relatively chill stop.

@@JoeMac1983 Not true. There's no way they would've done this to a white person.

He doesn’t need proof. The fact the the driver didn’t stop immediately is reason enough to approach the vehicle with gun drawn.

Because he didn’t stop for a whole minute.

Mechanic - So you don’t want any police?

Well that's not anecdotal at all. Such statements do zero to help. So just don't make them.

Freedom of speech. Don’t listen to comments against it.

@@Mark-sn6kh neither is yours

@@Mark-sn6kh yours sucked a lot more!!!

I've visited Florida a few times, my folks go there during the winter months. There are plenty of elderly people in their area. I witnessed a person drive for a few minutes before they realized the lights and sirens were on behind them. After they pulled over, the police officer casually walked up to the car. The law with regards to evasion is obviously not practiced uniformly thought the state. There is no provision on the books for elderly drivers who have no clue what's going while being pulled over. The video that was released does not show how long the officer behind the vehicle, when he turned his lights or siren on or any radio communication. It will be interesting to see how this case plays out when all the facts are laid bare. There are certainly many more facts regarding this traffic stop that are not yet on public record. The fact that a lawyer is taking this on as a case leads me to side with you Mr. Griswold regarding this matter.

Yea but if you drove for 1 minute after they put their sirens on in the UK you’re in handcuffs

@@pwners4u not at gun point

@@Juandongduck no but that’s because our police and citizens don’t carry guns, unless the armed police are called for a traffic stop or house raid

I think that the police in the USA have to show that they are working otherwise they will have problems with the boss. This is the only way to explain why so many people are stopped by the police for reasons that are not reasons

@@pwners4u no hour not I've done it many times

Lol people continue to drive so they can reach or hide objects in their vehicles. Not unheard of. The officer’s perspective is that he was fleeing which is considered a felony if proven, so it becomes a felony stop.... all if proven.

Right and he has no business as a “peace officer” if he hadn’t profiled him from the get go they wouldn’t be there

@@MN-ub7gl You assume he had PC to pull him over. The video clearly shows the man removing his seatbelt. Absent video showing he put it on after the officer attempted to pull him over. I would say the entire stop was unjustified. Before you tell me this is unlikely. I have on no less than 3 occasions been pulled over for not having a seatbelt on even though I did. Each time I was wearing dark clothing and it was in full daylight. Officers make mistakes and it is up to the officer to not commit perjury to justify their actions.

@@MN-ub7gl thats also true. What a mess.

No, he actually pulled a gun because he thought he was running from him. Still wrong but that is the reason, not the seat belt.

Change always start with one person.

Hear hear

Thanks for sharing that. Best of luck to your friend. I'm sure she will make a great officer. Cheers!

I've been saying this for a few months. These and many other auditors should be part of LEO's continuation training. Think cities have liability insurance for police. What would be interesting is if someone talked to the insurance company and then they made the cops watch these videos.

Since I've started watching this channel, I've said this should be shown to officers regularly. And they should have to take tests regarding the videos. It's also helpful for me and other private citizens. I've learned so much!

I had to watch that part again, you can see the shoulder belt move before he got out of the car. The cop put his car in park after he opened the door so he was rather excited on cuffing the counsellor.

@@steveboverie9432 @ 1:03 the cop repeats get out of the vehicle...guy says i have my seat belt on..reaches over and unlatches it

@@mattf49006 I had a hard time seeing the seat belt but seeing it move showed that he was wearing the seat belt.

F-

He could have easily put his seatbelt on while he was still driving. Didn't think of that?

Agreed.. maybe it was his training as a counselor... he's probably been in a lot of crazy situations and could keep his cool

Yes, he says this every video...

This is why i tell by black brothers to remain calm and in control when dealing with cops, Even when you are in the right. Know your rights, state them assertively and confidently but not aggressively. And after all of that if a police still wanna fuq up at his job, let him. Why are you stopping him? It’s your duty to let him fuq up. Just make sure to get it on camera and sue him in court.

Maroxa LosesWeight u r simply dead wrong. The problem is cops shooting people just because they get butthurt.

I agree but sometimes it still dose work out

Another you tube lawyer. In Florida, fleeing from police is a felony and procedure is to approach with a gun drawn.

@@cartrack730 shit man i guess we treat people who drive an extra 60 seconds the same as we treat people who go 120mph down a busy street? That's not very cool

​@@cartrack730 fleeing from the police for a minute or so?

@@cartrack730 ok bootlicker

​@@cartrack730fleeing from cop rule needs to be properly defined

Yeah, what was he thinking 🤣. I think he said it twice. To be fair, I imagine he felt stressed though after following this man for a minute wondering if something bad might happen.... Even though I despise many cops, they aren't robots, and it can be a very dangerous job. My respect to any cop who is doing it right and I hope the rest get fired ASAP!

@@FreedomExperiment not a single one is doing it right though so I think you're crazy

@@GetCarelessNonsense! as someone who has been falsely convicted of a crime I can assure you the only thing that has been said that is crazy, is what you said. Police are absolutely necessary, otherwise there is chaos, wise up

@@FreedomExperiment Armed citizens are absolutely necessary, then we wouldn't really need cops.

@@scottmerrow7617 What about when some armed citizen kills another person wrongfully..? I understand the current system of policing in America is terrible but that doesn't mean that we don't need some form of police. The police obviously need a massive and sweeping overhaul of all systems in the US at minimum for sure

Your snowflake opinion doesn’t matter. The rating for cops is based on how well the law and procedure was followed. Regardless of the encounter. And regardless of your emotions.

I agree with Victor. There was no threat, therefore the police officer drawing his gun was unnecessary. Not wearing a seatbelt is not enough of a reason to assume threat to an extent that you feel your life is in danger. I guess the uploader didn't take that into account

@@AnjewTate whoa! He's just expressing an opinion man. Why so belligerent? I agree with him as well. A firearm being drawn when it wasn't called for, by anyone, not just cops, is not justifiable. He was obviously acting with prejudice which he blatantly displays with his reaction to the driver stating he was a counselor. Many times this channel has stated that an officer's attitude and interaction as contributing factors in the grade they were given. So, you are mistaken when you say grades are only based on how well the law and procedure was followed. Racism displayed by any cop is an automatic F. Or perhaps you haven't been paying attention to our cities burning because of racist cops.

unfortunately he was fleeing the cops in their eyes so hence the gun

@@trevorjosephoneill345 fleeing ?🤣🤣😀😀

How about a C for having a dickhead attitude

Umm the narrator is clearly white so he’s biased

Exactly, a B is defending this officers actions which were at most highly unnecessary because the man obviously did not posse a threat or show any signs of anger so that cop really asserted his legal power to justify pulling out his gun on a obvious shaken innocent man

It’s called search incident to arrest no warrant is necessary to search the vehicle

@@usmc1812 No! You can tow the vehicle and get a warrant. There is no chance that while the police have a vehicle, someone can come and remove anything from it. You should need a warrant and its all mute since the arrest was illegal anyway

The cops seem to assume people are always lying and don't believe anything people say unless there is absolute proof.

The thing is he had his seatbelt on..

@@slowanddeliberate6893 Because they're legally allowed to, I always assume the cops are lying. So I guess that's fair

Exactly!!! B for pulling a gun over a seatbelt?!? Are you kidding me??

I 👍 agree

Gun was pulled for fleeing, not for a seatbelt. When cops engage in a pursuit, they are trained to stop the vehicle under a gun point because there is a high probability of a weapon being inside of a car. The speed of a vehicle is NOT important. I know it looks stupid, but if the guy had a gun, it wouldn't look stupid. Cops were actually very polite and professional during this interaction, I've watched the whole body-cam footage as well, you can find it somewhere. I don't know how many of these videos you've watched, but the editors would never give the officer that high of a mark for gun being pulled, unless it was completely lawful in that situation.

I disagree. When someone appears to be fleeing from the cops they are FAR more dangerous than your standard pull over. In this case the cop did the right thing.

@@perasima6533 He didn't flee , that's speeding away. WOW!!! It's his right to feel safe. Had no weapon , posed no weapon. Fleeing is not ever stopping. The world is in trouble if people use your logic.

I feel that would either work really well or you'd be laughed out of court

Love it.

no shit, florida's legislature and supreme court are failing its citizens in this instance.

LOL I love it

Nice!