Oh nice thank u. I need these ? I was gonna go over every ? And write them down myself but u sent it to me thanks 👍

Thank you so much for all you do. I know I need to email my mom's friend so I think I'll start with a couple questions and if she seems interested then I can show her the video.

Answer to your last question, the "temple rituals aren't secret but they are sacred" *insert eye roll to the heavens here* (I looked up the rituals they do in the temple and I walked away feeling icky.)

@@christopherfoote4643 if we aren't supposed to know what's going on in the temples, why hasn't the LDS church done something about the videos on the Internet? Because anybody can look up what goes on. And don't tell me that there's nothing that they can do because the LDS church does have ways and the power to take them down

@@christopherfoote4643 wow someone who claims to be a man of God you sure are judgemental to those who don't have the same beliefs as you. I am married so I wouldn't be interested in you. Even if I wasn't married there is no way in hell I'd ever date you with how judgemental you are. I get that it's a breach of privacy so I'm asking why doesn't the church do anything to take the videos down? They could hire lawyers and have them taken down and whoever put them up prosecuted. Why don't you just leave this channel alone, and go about your marry way.

how exciting. they way you talk, i can almost sense new life like like a fresh cool breeze, with every breath you take. 58 years and born again. that doesn't happen much either. i was a late bloomer too @40 years.

God has such incredible things in store for you. His Truth will set you completely free from all the years of hard experiences. Praying for you 🙏❤️

Shalom Lisa, what about reading the original scriptures, the bible is a corrupt book, a mistranslation of the original scriptures, with lots of words and names changed by the roman sun worshippers. Research the real name of our creator, our father who talked with Moseh and gave us the ten commandments. Although the bible is corrupt, you can still read the context and message, so you can study and ready it. The name of our creator is not god, but YAHUAH, Hebrew I WAS, I AM, I WILL BE and His beloved son Yahusha (Hebrew for Yah is our Deliverer) and not the pagan name Jesus. Remember Yahusha is not Greek and not Roman, He was Hebrew. Research the letter J... it did not exist until 1478-1550, so the name Jesus was never written in the bible before that time... so why is this so important? Because the original names has a very very important meaning and message. Read Isaiah52:6 and remember the commandments You do not cast the Name of Yahuah your Alahim to ruin (in the bible KJV version Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. So even though it was written, still the enemy changed it, because truth is in the scriptures... that's why those sunworshippers started the catholic church and honour many pagan feasts like christmas and eastern, they wear dagon hats and use occult symbols in their clothing and buildings, you have to ask youself why is that? It is time for christians who believe in Yahusha the Son of our creator YAHUAH, who died for our sins, so that we have eternal life to research and pray. All those who seek the truth read Deut 4:2 and Matt 5:17

Or you could wake up and be rational and logical

I'm 58 & was a mainstream Catholic for 38 years. The last 20 increasingly traditional Catholic & REFRESHING! Give traditional or Maronite Catholicism a try.

I'm so glad you've been researching! Just because Mormonism is false, don't give up on the Bible! God is real. The LDS version of god is not. I pray you'll find truth in the Word of God! Mormonism distorts and corrupts Christianity but true Christianity offers all the answers to life with verifiable evidence. Josh Mcdowell has a book called "Evidence that Demands a Verdict" and it's a powerful example of evidential and verifiable truth found within the Bible. Praying for you as you continue to seek truth!

Don't get me wrong. They're plenty brainwashed. But this video uses a lot of falsehoods

I know right! so glad you're out of there

@@bookofmormonanswers whatever it's worth, they probably just learned that certain things were being kept secret from them. For example, you don't tell anyone what the covenants in the temple are before they are endowed. Sometimes finding it out and finding out it was withheld from you is a game changer.

@@bookofmormonanswers What do you say to the person that says that they have prayed and the holy spirit told them that the book of mormon is not true? It seems to be based of off feeling not actual proof or evidence towards truth. There is a lot more evidence proving Mormonism wrong than proving it right. I encourage you to do your own research on these things on a non Mormon website. God is good and will reveal himself if you truly seek him! I have a lot of love and compassion for you in my heart!!

Yeah. Mormonism is a tragedy. So many people who think they know God but they don’t.

What is it about God you know about that LDS don't? Just asking. I believe in the New Testament Jesus and I am LDS. I don't think I'm off my rocker. Thanks.

@@stanleyhall8951 I love the LDS church I was raised in the LDS; the difference it changed for me is dispensationalism rightly dividing the word the difference between the Old testament and the New testament, salvation in the Old testament was different than salvation in the New testament

Thanks. I'm sorry for your difficulty.

@@amazingcolorizing4975 _"God is not a Man who was "exalted" to become a God."_ God is not a spirit. Before you try to misquote John 4:24, you are misquoting that in 2 ways. First, In Greek there is no equivalent for the English word “a” so the translation can be interesting. Meaning that “God is spirit” and “God is a spirit” are technically both correct translations. However, If we compare to other scriptures of similar structure then we clearly see that it wasn’t not meant to be a literal description of God being but is describing one attribute of God. For example, in 1 John 4:8 it says that “God is love.” In 1 John 1:5 it says “God is light.” Deuteronomy 4:24 and Hebrews 12:29 says that God is a consuming fire. Is God literally love? Is He literally light? Is he literally a consuming fire? No, Those are attributes of God not descriptions. Second, the context of this verse is talking about the worship of God and again, not a literal description. God is spirit in that He is holy and pure and they that worship him must worship him in holiness and purity. Interestingly, This debate over whether God is a material being, or an incorporeal, immaterial being was a highly debated subject in the early centuries of the Church. In fact, for a time John 4:24 was used as evidence that God did have some kind of material body because the Greek word that is translated as “spirit” (Pneuma) can also mean “air” or “wind”, which is a material substance. Origen, who is known as the most important theologian of the early Greek church and who believed that God was incorporeal and immaterial, defends his views by arguing that John 4:24 isn’t meant to be interpreted literally. Now, if God was once a mortal being it is in no way inconsistent with the fact that he now has all power and all knowledge and possesses every virtue, grace, and godly attribute that the Bible, Book of Mormon and Doctrine and Covenants have said God has. Irenaeus, a highly respected and influential early church father, stated "How, then, shall he be a God, who has not as yet been made a man? Or how can he be perfect who was but lately created? How, again, can he be immortal, who in his mortal nature did not obey his Maker? For it must be that thou, at the outset, shouldest hold the rank of a man, and then afterwards partake of the glory of God. For thou dost not make God, but God thee" (Irenaeus Against Heresies 4:523, Ante-Nicene Fathers 1:523-524) Here Irenaeus, an early church father, argues that how can we become a god, if we were not once a man. Using this same line of argument, how could God become a God, if He was not a man once? John 5:19 says The Son can’t do anything that He hasn’t seen the Father do. Would that mean that God lived as a spirit in a pre-mortal life, was born and received a body, died, and was resurrected and Jesus imitated what the father did? We are also made in the image of God, pretty heavily saying God at the very least looks like a man. We believe God has always existed for eternity too. D&C 93:29 “Man was also in the beginning with God. *Intelligence, or the light of truth, was not created or made, neither indeed can be.”* I think it is safe to say God has intelligence so therefore He was not created and has existed forever in our theology. Throughout the scriptures God is called Eternal or Endless, including in the Book of Mormon and Doctrine and Covenants. God is Endless and Eternal because his power, kingdom and dominion are Eternal and Endless. God has no limits to His power. He is from everlasting to everlasting because His power continues, having no end. Also, saying God is a man isn’t a unique idea by Joseph Smith. It was said by Jesus in Mark 10:18 in the 1611 edition of the King James Version which reads "why callest thou me good? There is no man good, but one, that is God". The phrase ‘no man’ was removed from every subsequent printing of the King James Bible even though the same Greek word (oudeis) is also translated ‘no man’ in Revelation 7:9 and 14:3 (and yes if you were to look it up online the Greek Bible then the Greek word oudeis is there in Mark 10:18). _"God took on flesh and dwelt among us (John 1:1)"_ The trinitarian view of God (3 persons 1 being) is not found in the Bible. No verse describes God as 3 persons 1 being in the Old or New Testament, if God was like that then wouldn't you think it would have been explicitly mentioned? It doesn't say that and no honest reading of the Bible would lead you to conclude that God is 3 persons 1 being. The Bible claims Jesus Christ is Lord (Romans 10:9, 1 Corinthians 8:6, Philippians 2:11) and the Son of God (Matthew 3:17, Matthew 17:5, John 10:36, John 20:31), He is our mediator with God (1 Timothy 2:5), who said that God the Father is greater (John 14:28) and that God was his God (John 20:17), He wanted us to be one with Him and God as they are with each other (John 17:21-23). Paul very clearly tells us that to us there is one God, the Father and one Lord, Jesus Christ. (1 Corinthians 8:6). There is no verse in the bible to back up your pagan belief and to explain it you have to use sources that came centuries later. John 1:1 does not support your pagan belief. Jesus Christ does the Father's will and His (Jesus Christ) will is subjected to the Father and has the authority to speak and act on the Father’s behalf making him the word of God. Jesus Christ is the example of the fulfillment of God’s word of providing a savior for mankind. Through Jesus Christ can our words both reach and be fulfilled by God (1 Timothy 2:5). When in John 1:14 the word became flesh, the Words of God took life in Jesus Christ and to show people that you can live a life free of sin through Jesus Christ being that example (John 13:15, 1 Peter 2:21, 1 John 2:6). Jesus Christ is the fulfillment of promises made to us before the foundation of the Earth (Ephesians 1:4-5, 2 Timothy 1:9, Titus 1:2). Jesus Christ is the word and the word is God the Father because he speaks on behalf of God, the words of God made flesh, through him does communication with God exist, is the fulfillment of promises that God made from before the foundation of the Earth and is the messenger of salvation. _"God did not have physical sex with Mary."_ We don't believe that either. _"There are not unlimited Mormon Gods equal to our God) in the cosmos."_ That is debated and most don't believe that either. _" God doesn't have multiple wives - nor ANY wife"_ If there is a father and a son then logic would dictate there is a mother. Oh wait, your so-called "god" isn't logical and you can't explain it or make sense of it so you "live by faith". _"There is no marriage in Heaven. "_ You are severely misquoting that. All three places this is said in (Matthew 22:30, Mark 12:25 and Luke 20:35) makes it very clear that it is talking about the resurrection. The Greek word there is "anastasei" which translates to resurrection. If they wanted to use heaven then they would have used "ouranō". They didn't, which is why it reads as "For in the resurrection (anastasei) they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven (ouranō)." How you equate Jesus talking about no marriage during the resurrection, an event, to meaning no marriage in heaven, a place, is beyond me. If you read our own scriptures then you will find it actually agrees with these passages. It says that if your marriage isn't by God and that if these marriages aren’t made before the resurrection then when you are dead you will not be married and be appointed angels in heaven. (If you care to look it's D&C 132:15-16). In Greek, the language this was originally written in, the expressions “marry” (gamousin) and “given in marriage” (gamizontai) translate forms of the related Greek verbs gameō and gamizō, which have to do with the act of becoming married. The first verb is used here to refer to men and the second to women. If Matthew, Mark or Luke had wanted to say that Christ had said something like “Neither are they now in a married state" (because of previously performed weddings) then in Greek they would have used a perfect tense (gegamēkasin) or a participial form (gamēsas) of the verb. They did not, so that cannot be what Jesus meant. Jesus said nothing about the married state of those who are in heaven only that there isn't marriage during the resurrection. The source of the story the Sadducees told Jesus comes from one of the books in the Apocrypha, Tobit. A woman was married to seven men, each of whom died on the wedding night but then had an 8th husband, Tobias the son of Tobit (because she belonged to Tobias by right of inheritance), that was decided in heaven and she would be his in the hereafter. (Tobit 7:10-11). Raphael (the archangel) was even sent to marry the woman to Tobias. (Tobit 3:17). Jesus probably had this account in mind when He told the Sadducees "You are in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God" because they had neglected to note that the woman had married an 8th husband and that God had sent an angel to marry them so that there marriage was recognized in heaven and she would be his in heaven.

Watch dan Vogel on KZfaq for a detailed history of the church. Read the CES letter for a good list ofvthe issues. Part Native American here so the whole dark skin is a curse thing in Mormonism is a big deal and very racist. Never turned white and delightsome myself

@@shawnbradford2243 ty for your response

@@calebschmidtyay is FairMormon lead by the prophet of god?

@@bryonnajones hey the church is true, feel free to join. We love u.

The missionaries job is to bring souls to Christ to teach the first principles of the Gospel. They bring a simple message, pray about it with real intent

Sadly, they are.

It's great you started asking questions. Truth does not fear questions. May God continue to open your heart and mind to His glory!

@Hale Hafa To answer both of your questions: Who is Jesus Christ? According to the Bible, He is the Father's Son, as much Deity as the Father is Deity, the promised Messiah. What does it mean to be born again? According to the Bible, in John 3 it states that one must be 'born of water an the spirit'. In 2 Thes 1:8 we must 'obey the gospel of Christ', in 1 Cor 15:1-4 we find the gospel of Christ is 'the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus'...so we must obey 'the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus; in Romans 6 we read that we do that through full immersion/baptism into water which, according to Acts 2:38, is where we receive the Spirit of God. That is the literal act of 'being born again', but there are deductive ways to understand it as well. Romans 6 also tells us that when we raise from the waters of baptism, we are raised 'with Christ into new life'. That is the moment we are 'born again'. We are urged in the NT to abide in Christ in this new life so we can maintain our relationship with Yahweh.

@Hale Hafa Good morning! Yes, Jesus is God's Son. Yes, the Bible makes it clear we must be immersed. What would I say to those who don't speak of it? It really depends on their reasoning, but the answer is always in scripture. Immersion in and of itself is simply a bath or a jump in the pool. But when we seek God in faith and sincerity, we cannot escape the scriptures (ok, we can, but it just means we forsake salvation). One of the most popular reasons for ignoring baptism is because people take a single verse -either Jn 3:!6, or Acts 10:17 (i think)...belief or confession... and use that as their entire doctrine for salvation. Neither of those verses provide the full picture, as is so often the case in scripture. We need to take the WHOLE picture scripture paints for us and then make our doctrines from the comprehensive sum of them. In the case of salvation, there are a tremendous amount of scriptures on the topic. All the other essential parts of salvation...faith/belief, confession, repentance...are linked to baptism. So why knit pick? I will always bring someone to Romans 6 because Paul does such an excellent job of explaining how immersion is the manner by which we die to the law and sin. It is only when we've died to the law and the sin it highlights that we can actually live in grace. That does not happen in prayer, confession, or upon our faith - it happens through the faith that has grown from the moment we believe Him to be God the Son - but our death to the law/sin does not happen by it alone. I hope that helps.

In terms of that verse in Galatians what does “gospel” mean? What’s the same as the gospel in the Bible and the gospel in the plates? What’s different? I highly doubt you understand what that verse is trying to say.

Mormonism is a false religion and that can be proven with historical facts.

Fsrd you can’t prove the Bible as the word of god either. Lots of historical texts conflict with the Bible. You believe in the Bible because of faith.

@@Tom-vg5nb Actually I can in fact historically prove The Bible as being correct. Look back into history, look at prophecies which come out of The Bible and the fulfillment of these prophecies. Look in the book of Matthew, what Jesus prophesied would happen to the Jews came into fulfillment within the generation he prophesied it would. There are many other examples on top of this as well. We have over 5,000 texts of original manuscript pieces. There are over 20,000 translations of original text into other languages that can be compared to one another to get a true and accurate account. There are ample amounts of documented history in support of The Bible. Not only is there written history, there is also archeological and Geological support for it. There is always a point at which someone must have faith but that does not mean we are void of historical, archeological and geological documented facts which support The Bible as being a true and legitimate text.

Lazy retort with significantly no evidence to back it up.

m.kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ppaTf66lt5vPlnk.html&feature=share

Check those "refernces" she misquoted the 1st chorinthians chapter 7 verse 1.

Are you aware that Jessie changed the wording on the quotes or hyped them up in quite a few places? I checked every quote. This is deceit. A noble Christian trait, right?

She changes the quotes when she can. See the post above.

Congratulations! So happy for you!! ❤

Praise God!!! Study diligently. There are false doctrines in the Christian church too.

She had fooled you too. Her sources are altered when she can and she makes an opinion into doctrine. That's deceit.

@@misssue1824 Deceit is perverting God's word. Joseph Smith was a false prophet and led many lost sheep astray and his teachings are still causing many to stumble. Heres a quote I'm not sure if she mentioned but this quote the vary character and fruits of the Mormons false prophet. Source: Histories of the Church, Volume 6, 408-409 " God is in the still small voice. In all these affidavits, indictments, it is all of the devil -all corruption. Come on! ye prosecutors! ye false swearers! All hell, boil over! Ye burning mountains, roll down your lava! for I will come out on the top at last.

A true prophet is always 100% accurate. A true prophet does not mock God and say he is an exalted man.

You wait for 5 minutes in to answer a question? Answer them all

No they didn’t. If you read the Bible in Hebrew, the cities and towns were very specific.

Another person who didn't check Jessie's sources. She changed words and took opinions and treated them like church doctrine. Let's see. Who uses deceit?

@@misssue1824 I didn't watch this video all the way through but if Youd like to see a more accurate video I'd suggest checking out Mike Wingers videos on the Mormon belief.

Yes, let me get a link for you!!

I'm taking notes, its very difficult as its hard to keep up, I can post them, if Jessie doesn't.

@@itsmejessie me two beloved sister in Christ Jesus 🙏 amen sister

@@sallypeterson3171 me two please let me know? Beloved

Yes, I agree!

Yes! 😭 I'm sorry. I had to re-upload it because KZfaq messed up the sound really bad.

Another person who didn't check Jessie's sources. She changed words and took opinions and treated them like church doctrine. Let's see. Who uses deceit?

Another person who didn't check Jessie's sources. She changed words and took opinions and treated them like church doctrine. Let's see. Who uses deceit?

I’ve just been ex Mormon for 8 months, I’ve been Mormon and living in Utah my entire life, and It’s so hard to unsee everything! 😭😭😭 It’s like a PTSD or some MK Ultra remnants that you can’t get out of your head.

@@Pikachufps3 the term you're looking for is Complex PTSD, or CPTSD. It's a more recently studied issue, and many of us exmormons do fit the criteria for that diagnosis!

@@aileenmcintosh2162 As someone who actually has PTSD from physical and emotional abuse from my childhood, it is an insult and mockery to me and anyone else who has PTSD to sit here and say the Church has given you PTSD. Sorry, but you don't fit the criteria. Nothing the Church does is abusive and there is nothing you could say that the Church does that would ever compare to real traumatic events. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is God's and Jesus Christ one and only true church here on earth. While you should rejoin, you don't have to but you need to get out of the Exmo hate cult you are in because it is poisoning you mind.

Another person who didn't check Jessie's sources. She changed words and took opinions and treated them like church doctrine. Let's see. Who uses deceit?

​@@misssue1824well I have all the LDS books and they are false. LDS "jesus" is Not the true Jesus of the Bible. not even going to "debate with you or any LDS person. been there done that because your ears are closed and your eyes blind com the True gospel, the Bible. we all die and will face our maker. we either choose eternal life or eternal death. I choose eternal life. p.s. most evangelistic churches are wrong also. so far away from actual Biblical truth it is laughable.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jJ-qopCiyMXceYU.html

And Jesus said this is how you are to pray. Our Father short in heaven.......lds must be calling Jesus a liar then

@@ebear6555 You know the Lords prayer is in the Book of Mormon right? We wouldn't dare call Jesus a liar.

@@stevenpictures1 yet LDS claims the Bible to be corrupt. The BOM is though. A FALSE gospel/ book/ scripture what ever you want to call it. Blasphemy!!!

@@ebear6555 Yeah well, that's just like ... uh ... your opinion man.

Such as what did you find unappealing that cause you concern

Yeah me too! Because in reality they don't really want answers. They just want to live in their delusions that answers don't exist.

Jeffrey Smith Yeah. It’s unfortunate. Oh well! 🤷🏽‍♀️

@ChicHulaGirl But would the answers be consistent and logical though?

John Lombard I don’t think there’s much about the Gospel that can be considered logical.

@ChucHulaGirl In context to your first comment on this thread, it is relationship to having an answer that is actually true. If you have an irrational and illogical answer, given which God created those concepts of rationality and logic, then you ought to have answers that are in fact rational and logical.

Another person who didn't check Jessie's sources. She changed words and took opinions and treated them like church doctrine. Would a Christian do that?

How about deceptive? She changed words and took opinions and treated them like church doctrine. Christian behavior?

Potterlover713 i didn't seek her videos out either. I was watching conference talks... goes both ways

Adds are all based on your own personal searches across all your media and apps and internet searches. It has nothing to do with me.

@@itsmejessie oh I wasn't blaming you, I'm sorry if you took it that way. I was just thinking it was ironic mostly, and frustrating lol. I took a college class on Mormonism so I guess I visited the lds website for research too much 🤷‍♀️

@@pottterlover713 Oh okay, yeah, I understand! My recommended videos are often LDS channels and Mormon topics. Obviously I spend a LOT of time on lds.org with my channel. 😉

@potterlover713 Ohhh yesss We as the church of jesus christ of latter day saints are complete aliens who hack every anti mormon video so that they have our ads. It couldnt possibly be a coiencidence!!! Ok honestly bro you are very desperatly grasping at straws

I thought your 2nd up load was perfectly fine. Sound was good.

@@prayingpatriot8018 I used a copyrighted song in the last upload and once KZfaq removed it, the sound was horribly distorted. You probly saw it before the music was removed. I missed your first comment, unfortunately.

Do you have a link to a list of all of these questions? Would you mind making a PDF and making it publicly available?

It's Me Jessie oh yeah...well I have 48 (that’s right forty-eight) questions a Neo-Evangelical Sectarian such as yourself couldn’t answer. So now what?? Hahaha. See, I can do the theological juvenilism thing too👌🏼. I recently came across your videos and I have to tell you they are...well...this is how I would best describe the overall presentation/delivery method of your content: First, you add an outward shell of Mary Tyler Moore meets Martha Stewart. On the inside however you add some snide, cryptic, underhanded conjecture mixed with a BIG heaping tablespoon of hyperbole and over/under reaching contextualizations of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints...and then...batta bing badda boom, you have itsmeJessie👍🏻🤗. Even though she has never spent ONE single day as a faithful member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, she definitely is the “one true Scotsman” when it comes to our faith. You see, even though someone like me could give a comprehensive, contextualized, and faithful response to all of these “questions” it doesn’t really matter because Jessie (and all those antagonistic to my faith) are the only ones that have the “REAL” answer rubric. Yes, you see, MY responses could ONLY be the result of the constant “brainwashing” I receive or purely because gosh darn it I am just sooooo “deceived”. Isn’t that right Jessie? I mean, I just have not yet reached the theological and intellectual Zen that you and your followers have reached so I should just realize that YOU guys are the only ones with the acceptable answers to these questions....not a knowledgeable/believing/faithful member of the church 🤔 On a serious note Jessie, I really think you have some major theological tunnel vision. Without going into my credentials let’s just say I know a thing or two about theology and history. I am sure you have little to no clue about the history of the early church following the death of the Savior all the way to the various offshoots of “Christianity” that formed after the reformation. In my experience, most evangelicals/born agains have absolutely no clue about the muddy process that was the canonization of the Bible you currently hold in your hand. I love the Bible and believe it IS inspired of God, but anyone with ANY theological/didactic integrity should realize that it is NOT infallible. The Book of Mormon is NOT infallible either, but I believe it to be inspired of God as well. The transcriptive and translational errors are man’s doing not God’s. I would like to see you give the same textual criticism to the Bible as you do the Book of Mormon. I would like you to delve into the corruption that surrounded the various ecumenical councils that spanned hundreds of years in order to try to create a credal totalitarian launching point to justify the eventual slaughter and banishment of millions of “heretics” and “non-believers”. Trust me, there is no history more corrupt than that of pre and post reformed “Christianity”. Whenever you make videos engaging in historical mudslinging towards my faith, I laugh knowing that there is an absolute litany of historical mud that could be thrown right back at you 1000 fold. Yet, due to your severe theological tunnel vision, you will continue to sling mud at my faith while failing to give any attention to the heaping mound of theological and historical corruption surrounding your faith system. I could easily create a video called “47 questions evangelicals/born-agains can’t answer” with ease. I could create a video with 247 with ease...but I won’t/wouldn’t because it would perpetuate the same circular argumentation that you seem to enjoy engaging in. Bottom line here is that Christ spent nearly ALL of His ministry telling people to “come follow ME” rather than “don’t follow them over there”. If there is anything I have learned from your videos it’s that if you are having toilet problems don’t call the plumber, call the pizza delivery boy who “claims” to know everything about plumbing.

Dr DLehrsch32 such a long reply, but nothing positive came out of it. Why don’t you answer these questions before attacking her?

I'm not feeling the love.

@@lindalds Why not?

@@LadyMaria lying is not live. Trying to destroy someone's faith, and not giving them any alternative is not love.

@noneya bizness \\// \ Live long and prosper.

@@lindalds the alternative is the true living God. That Jesus is Saviour and Lord, and that He took our punishment for sin on the cross.

hi. i’m not a mormon, but i never had this question as it has always seemed clear to me. all people on earth can feel and enjoy the holy spirit from time to time. when you read the scriptures, pray, go to church or do something nice. the holy spirit can also touch your heart when you watch, read or see something really beautiful. art, music, anything. however, only after getting baptised you receive (note) NOT the holy ghost, but the power of holy ghost. you are given the power of holy ghost that (as it is promised) from now on will ALWAYS be with you. it will become like your part, it will help you and give you more blessings and make you understand things better

This question of yours can just as easily be used against the bible as Jesus himself says that the Holy Ghost testifies of the truth. And yet the bible also speaks of people receiving the Holy Ghost after being baptized. Acts 19:2-6 The answer of course is simple. The gift of the Holy Ghost is not the same thing as the testimony of the Holy Ghost. Of course one can receive a testimony through the Holy Ghost before being baptized but the fulness of it cannot be attained until after baptism.

Yes, I wonder although I did baptize looking to leave myself

@@marinadavis8607 I left the church after reading the Bible...too many discrepancies between the true nature of God and practices of the church. Mainly, God says to walk in the light yet their are secrets in the church and I read the CES letter and their are too many lies that were covered up. Humans aren't perfect of course, but God is clear how He feels about liars...they have no place in heaven. I go to the Seventh Day Adventist church now. They're not perfect either but they teach out of the Bible and don't have problems trying to answer tough questions. I recommend going straight to the source...God. if you truly seek Him, you WILL find Him. That's His promise not mine. I've had so many miracles happen since I found God and I'll never let any religion come between us again. I believe there are true disciples of Christ all over the world in many religions. If you love God, keep His 10 commandments. Even the 4th one keeping the 7th day Sabbath holy. God never changed the Sabbath to Sunday, the Catholic church did that and they don't have the power to change God’s directions. No one on earth does. Trust God and His word, the Bible...no one else. God bless you 🙏

never heard of the light of Christ?

Good work! Find something they can easily understand to show them the difference. Maybe doing a Bible Study on the Book of Galatians. I'm hearing that is a good book for understanding that Salvation comes through Faith and not works. Soon after Salvation the works come out of a changed heart and mind. This is possibly the most important point to understand about Gospel since people have a tendency think they have to earn or do something to deserve things no matter what their beliefs are.

Of course knowing the Biblical Jesus Christ is the most important thing, however Salvation through Faith and not Works is oftentimes difficult for people to grasp. And is it something very important to know for that light to come on.

Besides just "dumping" the information on them, pray for them. Pray that the Holy Spirit can reach them and give them insight. Pray that God will save them. While Jessie's list is a good thing, remember that people can only manage so much and will fight against change.

@@leef_me8112 Yes good point about prayer. Remember to pray the Holy Spirit keep them from being mislead by the Mormon Missionaries.

@@Ben-pk4cv We aren't a works base gospel, anyone who says that is ignorant of what we believe. What we teach is that Jesus Christ dying on the cross is what allows us to be forgiven of our sins and is the gateway for us to be resurrected and have eternal life. Without that, no matter what we do, we wouldn't be able to save ourselves from our sins without the atonement. We believe that we are saved by grace through faith but that faith isn't just professed belief and is also expressed in our behavior and/or works (Matthew 7:21-23, James 2:14-26, Titus 1:16, Isaiah 29:13). Or put simply, works are outward manifestations of faith in Christ that allows God’s and Jesus Christ’s grace to increase and affect our lives more abundantly (Ephesians 2:10). However those works are not what save us, it is Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ paved the path to God with his blood when he was crucified and you have to follow the path that was laid out for us to walk in to get to God. The path we must walk to live with God again and to have His grace grow in our life that the Bible (and Book of Mormon) has said to do is to 1st have faith in Jesus Christ (John 3:36, John 6:29) 2nd keep the commandments (Matthew 19:17, Luke 11:28, John 14:15, John 14:21, John 15:10, Hebrews 5:9, 1 John 2:3-4, 1 John 5:3, Revelation 12:17) and not to purposefully sin and/or repent when you have made a sinned (Acts 3:19, Acts 17:30, 1 John 1:9), 3rd make and keep the ordinances that God has asked of us like baptism (Matthew 28:19-20, Mark 16:16, Acts 2:38, Acts 22:16, Romans 6:3-10, Titus 3:5), 4th to serve and love others (Matthew 20:28, John 13:34-35, Galatians 5:13-14, 1 Peter 4:10-11) and 5th faithfully endure to the end (Matthew 10:22, Matthew 24:13, 2 Timothy 2:12, Revelation 2:26). To deny this is to deny the Bible.

#48 is false, he never denied practicing polygamy. #49 You're grasping straws, doesn't matter what we use for the sacrament, wine or water, as long as we focus on the Savior and his Atonement. #50 it's because Joseph Smith was human. Of course there will be mistakes and errors. God works with imperfect people. You think when the Bible was translated into English centuries ago, that there were no grammatical errors and corrections? Let's be real now.

@@goingtothetop55 In History of the ChurchVol. 6, p. 408-412 it records an “Address of the Prophet” on Sunday, May 26, 1844 where Joseph Smith states: “What a thing it is for a man to be accused of committing adultery, and having seven wives, when I can only find one.” Except for by this time he already had over 10 wives! That doesn't make any sense. If you are translating something then you would know how to spell the words in English ESPECIALLY when you are looking right at them. Also tell me if Polygamy was to take care of the widows of the Church then why did he marry a 14 year old GIRL?! Also if the book is supposed to be the most correct book then why would it need revisions and changes. The Book of Mormon claims that the Lamanites were the ancestors of modern day Indians/Native Americans and that their dark skin was a result of them turning away from God. If that is the case then 1. Why does DNA evidence contradict this with the fact that there isn't a drop of Semitic blood in Native Americans? And 2. Why hasn't the skin of those members of the Black Community and Native Americans that have joined the Church turned White? After all original copies of the Book of Mormon claims that they will become White and Delightsome? And my last point is since when is staring into a hat at magic rocks a method for translating ANYTHING?! I HIGHLY recommend that you either watch this video yourself or the "Top Ten facts that the Mormon Church doesn't want its members to know"

@@goingtothetop55 the difference is that when the Bible was translated it was being translated from Aramaic, Ancient Hebrew, and Greek and then from those languages into Latin and then into German and then finally into English. Where as the Book of Mormon was straight from "Reformed Egyptian" to English. So there is no excuse for the errors

oliver cowdrey was excommunicated in 1838 for insinusating that joseph smith was adulterous. the adultery had to come before 1838 because fanny alger left kirtland in 1837. the mormon church officially recognizes that joseph smith was doing fanny alger. he was doing her. it was adultery. he was doing her and oliver cowdery called him on it, and oliver cowdery was exed in 1838 for his troubles. the mormons recognize louisa beaman 1841 as joseph smiths first polygamous wife. polygamy and bigamy and adultery are not recognized by any state. it's all against the law. some mormon is going to tell me that polgamy is in the bible so it's okay. now i'm going to talk simple so any mormon can understand. the bible is a record of god's dealing with man. or god's dealing with sinful man. man is sinful so i just said man. the actions of man are sinful. the actions of god are not sinful. how can god who does not sin and cannot sin interact with sinful man? that's another topic. so we have instances where men are blatantly sinning, but they are in the bible. polygamy is such an instance. shall we also commit incest? i can show you clearly in the bible where lot committed incest. it's in the bible. will you use that instance to promote incest in your church? i hope i haven't given any of you mormons any ideas.

David Jensen I do not know the answer to #48 but as for #49- the wine/water is symbolic. It is not really the liquid itself but what it represents (Jesus’ blood). As for #50, Joseph Smith had only a 3rd grade education. Though he could read the translated words perfectly, he and those who helped him translate were subject to error because people aren’t perfect. Hope I could help :)

And still another person who didn't check Jessie's sources. She changed words and took opinions and treated them like church doctrine. Let's see. Who uses deceit?

Another person who didn't check Jessie's sources. She changed words and took opinions and treated them like church doctrine.

Some things may not be church doctrine but obvious contradictions within Mormon scriptures and teachings from apostles and prophets. King Follett discourse by Joseph smith taught a lot of Heresy, unbiblical, unchristian and following his way leads many zealous Mormons down the wide way (which says heaven) but to find yourself in Hell because it was the false, counterfeit way.

@@misssue1824 Some things may not be church doctrine but obvious contradictions within Mormon scriptures and teachings from apostles and prophets. King Follett discourse by Joseph smith taught a lot of Heresy, unbiblical, unchristian and following his way leads many zealous Mormons down the wide way (which says heaven) but to find yourself in Hell because it was the false, counterfeit way.

@@Dearmormon No, the King Follett Discourse simply clarifies what is in the Bible. We are children our Father in Heaven, just as Jesus Christ says. We are not some creation of a God that is unknowable and is very different from ourselves. Jesus Christ showed that we come to earth to get a body and be like Him and our Father. Why is that so offensive? We have a God who understands us and wants us to be like Him. This is what Romans 8:14-19 tells us. God is eternal. What does that mean? The Hebrew word is quedem. It means "that which is before, the east, ancient." That is not the same meaning we use in English. He is from "everlasting to everlasting." Everlasting is olam. It means "what is hidden, and beginning or end that is not defined, ancient as well as perpetuity." Read the statements of the early church fathers like Clement, Tertullian and Justin- all used philosophy to explain God in Platonic and Neo-Platonic concepts. By the time of the Nicaean Creed no one had the right understanding of God and there was no one who could reveal it.

@@misssue1824 Thank you for your reply 🌸 But the God of the Bible is knowable and he wants a personal relationship with his creation which is possible with the right God. It’s not possible with the God of mormonism. John 14:7 “If you had known Me, you would have known My Father also; from now on you know Him, and have seen Him”. 1 John 5:20- “And we know that the Son of God has come and has given us understanding, so that we may know him who is true; and we are in him who is true, in his Son Jesus Christ”. John 17:3- “This is eternal life, that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent”. BUT the omnipotent, omnipresent, and omniscient God CANNOT be completely understood by our finite minds. And that is okay, God made it that way. Is 55:8 “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, declares the Lord. As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts”. Job 11:7 “Can you fathom the mysteries of God? Can you probe the limits of the Almighty”. Is 40:28 “Do you not know? Have you not heard? The Lord is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth. He will not grow tired or weary, and his understanding no one can fathom.”. As for the King Follett discourse which you say “clarifies what is in the Bible”, you are mistaken because I know my Bible and I know what’s in it and what’s not in it. JS taught another gospel which Gal 1:8 warns us about “But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, he is to be accursed!”. The teachings of JS and the LDS church do not agree with essential christian doctrine. Here’s an example that is not biblical and a “real” christian would not agree with these mormon beliefs: the essence of God: God was once a man like us who progressed to Godhood. Or that Jesus is God’s literal firstborn son (thus making him created- like his brother Satan). So if you believe those LDS beliefs about who God and Jesus is then we believe in two different Gods. And only one of those god’s (the God of the Bible) can only save. All other gods can’t.

You did not ask a single one of these questions as a child.

@@loqutor well since you don't know me. You would not know. Yes I did. I asked a good many questions in cry class.

Oops ctr class

@@miriamcooper1320 Funny, I asked a lot of questions too, and never got in the slightest bit of trouble. Probably because I was willing to accept what I'd gotten wrong instead of just looking for an excuse not to be faithful.

@@loqutor so you have decided that you know my level of faith from one comment. Well I can say your Mormon judgement game is on point. Please enjoy judging my level of faith without learning anything about me first. Also thank you for the reminder. May God bless you. I hope your fourth of July is a wonderful day.

James Wines, I have an answer for this question although I’m not sure how you’re going to take it. My answer for you is that the Bible takes place in the Jerusalem area of the world and is referred to as the “stick of Judah” and the book of Mormon takes place in America referred to as the “stick of Joseph.” I also want you to know that the book of Mormon is a sacred record of people in ancient America and was engraved upon metal plates. The book of Mormon talks about the “brass plates” which were brought by the people of Lehi from Jerusalem in 600 BC. These contain the “five books of Moses and also a record of the Jews from the beginning down to the commencement of the reign of Zedekiah king of Judah and also the prophecies of the holy prophets” (1 Nephi 5:11-13) many quotations from these plates citing Isaiah and other biblical and non-biblical prophets appear in the Book of Mormon. Now you can believe what you wanna believe but I just want you to know that what I have said is true

You think the Bible is going to mention America by name? I think it's obvious that America has been a chosen land, but now I am worried that we are now facing God's wrath due to wickedness and corruption. Ether 2:8

@@heyman537 Not at all, God is with us, and satan is flipping out about it. Trump 2020 for world peace ✊🏻✊🏼✊🏽✊🏾✊🏿💖💗💙

Whether or not america is the promised land, there's no reason for the bible to mention america. It wouldn't have made sense to anyone then. And saying "america is the promised land" would just lead everyone to name their place america.

That’s because the church doesn’t tell true history of itself. Maybe you should get information from sources outside the church.

I can judge it straight away copy and paste.

Stop saying false accusations about the church of Jesus Christ of Latter. saint. The church is True it's the people who do wrong and blame the Church.

I am sure Jessie could get her answers. The question is would she be happy with them.

@@stanleyhall8951 1. Is there only one god, or are there multiple gods? If multiple, how is a person to choose which deserves obedience? 2. Would you agree that before anything can exist, something has to create it? Did your god create everything? If yes, who/what created your god? 3. Is your god infallible? 4. Is your god omnipotent? 5. Is your god omniscient? 6. Is your god benevolent, or malicious? 7. If your god cannot make mistakes, then it follows that everything it creates is either perfect, or that your god intentionally makes things that are flawed. Would a benevolent god intentionally create something likely to suffer because of its flaws? 8. If your god can do anything, and it created the universe, why didn't it simply create a perfect world inhabited by perfect beings? If your god wanted obedience, and god is not malicious, why did god make disobedience possible? 9. If your god knows everything, does it already understand every thought and feeling you have? Does it instantaneously know everything you say and do? If yes, what is the point of religious rituals, such as prayer? 10. Why would an omnipotent and omniscient god not communicate directly and unambiguously with individuals, with no need of books, churches, prophets, signs, miracles, etc? If a person is not intelligent enough, or not "worthy" enough to speak directly with god, whose fault is that? Who made the person in the first place? If a person is unworthy or incapable of directly communicating with god, how can that person be capable of recognizing a valid spokesperson for god? 11. Think about the person/people who convinced/persuaded/ordered you to believe in a version of god. Are they infallible? Is it at all possible for them to tell you something they sincerely believe, but for that thing they tell you to be actually incorrect? 12. Are feelings reliable tools to guide actions? Suppose I hear a person in my neighborhood talking a lot about the presence of violent break in robberies nearby, and I get apprehensive. I am convinced by the passion my neighbor puts into this story, even though I've seen no tangible evidence. That night, I hear a noise. I FEEL certain that it is a robber breaking in to harm my family. I get out of bed, pull a pistol from the bedside table. Without opening the bedroom door, I shoot through it to get the robber. When I open the door, there is my son, lying dead on the floor from my bullet. I was sure. I relied on my feelings. My fear of a robber. My hope of being a defender father. Feelings, not facts. Was that a good way to live my life? 14. Do you deny that religion (superstition, irrational behavior) is the root cause of most human conflict in history, that for centuries millions have been tortured and murdered "because god told me to do it"? 13. Suppose a person has a book full of maps to guide a group journey. They rely upon it, but the group is perpetually lost. You question the book, but your friend insists that the book is accurate. "How do you know?" you ask. They reply, "I know that this book is accurate and perfect, because it says so in the book." Your friend insists that the book is information from an expert, the best map authority who ever lived.....but some other people wrote the book, based on their interpretation of the map expert.....but that is okay, because of how passionately they shout about their version of the maps, and how strongly it makes your friend feel. When you show your friend hundreds of self contradictions in the book, they get upset and say that you are just not reading the book correctly. Which person is messed up? You, or the book fanatic? How do you justify cherry picking which parts of the bible to follow? 14. If the point is to die and go to heaven, why not simply commit mass suicide and get it over with? Christ was quite literally a kamikaze; is that what you preach should be emulated in daily life? 15. Why is it necessary to use superstition and irrationality to justify your practical principles? Why treat humans like a donkey in need of the stick of hell and the carrot of heaven? If you want positive secular behavior, why not justify that behavior in practical terms? Perhaps because you know that your principles are utterly impractical, that altruism is literally suicidal?

You have good questions. Could anyone answer them to your happiness is the question from me. See the LDS missionaries and ask them. I don't think I could answer your questions satisfactorily.

@@stanleyhall8951 I have met with missionaries, and they literally RAN out of my apartment when I asked these questions. What it boils down to is: "Dont you want to feel nice? I promise you will like it. Just hold still and accept it while I put JESUS up into your asshole, accept it with obedience and humility the way I did" Religion has NO ANSWERS THAT MAKE LOGICAL SENSE because they prey upon the weak, the desperate, the lonely, the stupid. It is a FAIRY TALE.

John Lombard why is there no explanation of how Adam and Eve had grandchildren without incest?

Shawn Bradford well, if no other people existed, it was the only way :/

Because Joe Smith didn't have a perfect grasp of the old dialect he was trying to fake it with..

This from the all-believable internet: The Meaning of YE YE means "Yes, yeah" or "You"

I caught Jessie changing words to make her arguments better and taking unofficial opinion and making them sound like doctrine. Sure, that's the Christian thing to do.

Kris Vilas www.google.com/shopping/product/1?q=encyclopedia+of+bible+difficulties&client=safari&hl=en-us&biw=375&bih=559&tbs=cat:784,pdtr0:956061|956063,vw:l,init_ar:SgVKAwiQBkoKUggIna06IJ-tOkoHsgQECNupIA%3D%3D,ss:44&prmd=sniv&prds=num:1,of:1,epd:17482245720084069789,paur:ClkAsKraX-gGMDNyz_GamXmTEmGeSg-MrYJdPCUPyYaS1hs5-_OmaStdIrcv7BgmVlxyLUKK2OhMjNxoDRlSZeJ3H8ds067E0a9rBRTGKrEuEpPHPXxaF4shFRIZAFPVH73oNCJVlX6KFGVoS-Rf2FNXy6QQqw,prmr:1,pid:17482245720084069789,cs:1

Hey Sally! I got this specific list from a Christian source and I posted the link in the video description above! Through all of my research, I found this list to be so excellent!! I actually have compiled another list, like this one, that goes even deeper into LDS teachings and I'll share it in a future video. The list in this video mentions subjects of many of my past videos and also covers big questions that are presented in the CES letter, among other places, and I just love that. I left out a couple of the questions from my source that I didn't like but overall, I found it to be so helpful and necessarily and had to share it. 🙂

www.oneplace.com/ministries/abounding-grace/read/articles/50-questions-to-ask-mormons-13705.html

They are questions that have been around for almost as long as the LDS church has been around.

What bullying, and what church leaders?

Right on about Abraham. Its unfortunate that so many people chose to leave the church over someone being rude to them. The title “Bishop” or “Stake President” doesn’t somehow magically change flawed people into perfect angels. I think we can all agree that Jesus was the only perfect being to walk the earth and with that knowledge we would all be ignorant to presume that church leaders would be perfect. They are not. Nor am I. Neither is anyone.

@@davislarsen7132 I think you’re perfect 😍

It is certainly not the unpardonable sin. Being married to an unbeliever can be one of the most difficult challenges in a Christian’s life. Marriage is a sacred covenant that joins two people together in one flesh (Matthew 19:5). It can be very difficult for a believer and an unbeliever to live in peaceful harmony (2 Corinthians 6:14-15). If one partner becomes a Christian after the marriage, the inherent struggles of living under two different authorities quickly become apparent. Often Christians in this situation will look for a way out of the marriage, convinced that this is the only way to truly bring honor to God. His Word, however, says the contrary. It is very important not only to be content in our situation, but also to look for ways to bring glory to Him out of our challenging circumstances (1 Corinthians 7:17). The Bible specifically addresses those who are married to unbelievers in 1 Corinthians 7:12-14: “…If any brother has a wife who is not a believer and she is willing to live with him, he must not divorce her. And if a woman has a husband who is not a believer and he is willing to live with her, she must not divorce him. For the unbelieving husband has been sanctified through his wife, and the unbelieving wife has been sanctified through her believing husband…” Christians married to unbelievers will need to pray for the power of the Holy Spirit to enable them to profess Christ and live in the light of God’s presence (1 John 1:7). They should seek God’s transforming power to change their hearts and produce the fruit of the Holy Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23). A Christian wife is obligated to have a submissive heart, even toward her unbelieving husband (1 Peter 3:1), and she will need to remain close to God and rely on His grace to enable her to do so. Christians are not meant to live solitary lives; they need to find support from outside sources such as the church and Bible study groups. Being married to an unbeliever does not alter the sacredness of the relationship, so it should be the priority of every Christian to pray for his or her spouse and set a good example, allowing Christ’s light to shine brightly (Philippians 2:14). May the truth found in 1 Peter 3:1-that an unbelieving spouse is “won over”-be the hope and goal of every Christian who is married to an unbeliever. www.gotquestions.org/married-unbeliever.html Have you read the book, Unveiling Grace, by Lynn Wilder?

@@strongtower9237 when i became a christian it was only a matter of months until my wife divorced me. family means nothing at all to the bishop/stk pres./grand poobah. they found her another. she remarried within a year to another mormon. i was called to freedom and never remarried praise god. mormonism is a satanic cult. that's what they are, that's what they act like.

@@longnamenocansayy I am so sorry to hear that. God bless you.

@@strongtower9237 thank you for expressing kindness. but really i was not aiming for that. divorce seems like an earth shattering event when you're going through it. but it's not that earth shattering. think about trading a mud puddle for a big pile of gold. that's what being called by god and taking a stand for him is like. i just didn't want to preach to lauren about what he should do. that's a personal choice. swallow years of insults from his non believer wife in front of the kids, or take a bold stand for god--let the chips fall where they may. or don't choose, which is a choice, and accept the results as they come. actually, my comment was suppose to be directed at lauren but i agree with what you said 100%

So you don't believe in baptism for the dead, prophets or the word of wisdom for example? That we don't need them any more?

@@amazingcolorizing4975 _"Paul wasn't calling "baptism for the dead" the will of God - and it isn't."_ Paul was most sensitive to blasphemy and false practice's. Multiple times he says not to be deceived by false teachers and doctrine (Romans 16:17, Galatians 1:6-8). He said that circumcision, a practice that was part of the Jew religion for centuries, is no longer needed and means nothing now and to stop teaching that it is needed (Galatians 5:2-6). Hell, the whole reason Paul wrote all of his epistles in the first place was to correct those churches when they started to go astray. There are probably other things in the Bible that I am forgetting that reflect his dislike of false teachings. Now with that being said, what makes you think Paul would have included 1 Corinthian 15:29 if he disapproved of baptism for the dead? There is nothing in the text before or after to indicate that he disapproves of the practice, even in greek. _"The Bible is clear that once you die - then comes the Judgement"_ Uh No, it doesn't say that. In fact, the Bible talks of multiple Resurrections. The Bible says that the Final Judgement will be after the 1000 years of Christ's reign on earth and after satan is loosed for a season. Revelation 20:4-12. Christ preached to the dead (John 5:25, John 5:28, 1 Peter 3:19) that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit (1 Peter 4:6) and that preaching is still happening today because every knee will bow and confess Jesus is Lord (Philippians 2:10-11) on judgment day. To live to God in the spirit is to follow Jesus Christ and do what he has asked of us. That doesn't mean that people get a second chance (or in our theology, will get to the Celestial Kingdom) if they were sinners and multiple of our prophets have said as much. We are told not to procrastinate our repentance from our own scriptures (Alma 34:33-35). We are judged on our works (Romans 2:5-6, Colossians 3:24-25, Revelation 20:12, Revelation 22:12), meaning those who did evil shall inherit evil and those who did good shall inherit good (John 5:29, 1 Corinthians 6:9-11). _"The Law and the Prophets were FULFILLED in Jesus Christ"_ No, the Law was fulfilled, Jesus was the last sacrifice for the sins of all the Earth. No where does it say that there will be no more prophets or the need has gone away. _"Nowhere to be found in the Bible. The life-style practices are fine, but it isn't doctrine in Biblical Christianity."_ Actually, the Bible very clearly warns not to drink excessively. Romans 13:13, 1 Corinthians 6:10, Ephesians 5:18, 1 Timothy 3:3, 1 Timothy 3:10, 1 Peter 4:3. Either way, who cares? We don't believe the Bible to be the only scripture so if something isn't said in it then it doesn't matter to us.

Ok thanks for straightening me out on that. It makes sense to me now. I have misunderstood that. I finally learned the story of Jesus and the Canaanite woman recently.

@@stanleyhall8951 i will have to look that up. Thank you for your reply.

​@@amazingcolorizing4975 Buddy, only type one comment out and post one comment with everything on it unless you run out of comment space. It's annoying to be spammed. _"You're incorrect about the Bible not saying "And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment"_ When most of you guys say that you mean that immediately as soon as you die you are judged, of which I was saying is not in the Bible. The Judgement happens all at one time at the end of the millennium, or 1000 years after the second coming _"You are living in a False Reality"_ LOL No, I am not. I am living in the true Church of God and Jesus Christ. _"are you calling the Word of God insufficient? Tell Him so when you come face to face"_ Uh are you claiming the Bible is Jesus? Because Jesus is not the Bible and to equate them is idolatry. The Bible is a book about Jesus, not Jesus. I am not calling Jesus Christ insufficient. I am saying that the Bible is not the only word from God. _" None of us has a 100% understannding of God."_ You may not but that is because your God is really confusing and illogical. My God is pretty easy to understand. _"His Word will ALWAYS be 100% True."_ I agree. The Bible, Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price will always be 100% true.

Death ends marriage. There is no marriage in heaven, except for being married to Jesus Christ. Are you looking forward to being married to Jesus Christ? Rev. 17

*_same with widow with 7 dead husbands - none were 2 living husbands at once_* There is nothing that says a brother of a dead husband must be single to marry his brother's widow.

@@fayelewis5476 *_Are you looking forward to being married to Jesus Christ?_* So Jesus Christ will be a polygamist?

@@lindalds - I always appreciate your comments - but she was married to 7 brothers and never 2 at once - - you also didn't even answer why Paul said a woman is "free to remarry when her husband dies " - LDS teaches a woman is free to remarry anytime - John Taylor's wife sure did - were you going to deny LDS polygamy or admit it has no basis in Scripture ? Hagar was sent away and not for adultery = NOT a wife - that would have been forbidden to put her away because of jealousy - proof is Ishmael as Firstborn had no Birthright - thx again

@@lindalds Let us rejoice and be glad and give the glory to Him, for the marriage of the Lamb has come and His bride has made herself ready.” 8 It was given to her to clothe herself in fine linen, bright and clean; for the fine linen is the righteous acts of the saints. 9 Then he *said to me, “Write, ‘Blessed are those who are invited to the marriage supper of the Lamb.’” And he *said to me, “These are true words of God.”

Which quote? The one that takes Brigham's opinion (which was the norm in his day) and then judges him with our racial understanding of today? Or the one stated before the Civil War when slavery was causing a hotbed of pre-Civil War tensions? If you like this stuff, read Martin Luther's book, "The Jews and Their Lies" where he rocommends driving Jews from their homes, synagogues and schools, burning their stiff and even exterminating them.

God bless you. Jesus said, "Follow me." Jesus is the good Shepherd. Jesus will never let you down. John 10:27-29 My sheep listen to My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me; 28 and I give them eternal life, and they will never perish; and no one will snatch them out of My hand. 29 My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father’s hand.

have you reached out to ex mo support groups, they might be helpful

Have you broken away?

@cherylburnett2014 I have broken away as in, I don't attend the LDS Church, but there are aspects of the indoctrination that still sit with me. I'm constantly striving and trying to attain perfection, which could be seen as a good thing to some, but it's very hard for me to surrender my desires and will over to God at times.

@@UNUmusic kzfaq.info/get/bejne/b9xyp5yGy8y2n4U.htmlsi=ogkBPyuS60pkuzHT

"Gotcha" questions with perfectly clear answers for one willing to seek them out don't disprove anything. One simple example from this video is the question referencing Isaiah 29:4. The video claims that the Church holds that this verse speaks of the BoM. That is simply not true. The Church holds that verse 11 thru basically the end of the chapter is a prophecy about the Restoration of Christ's Church in this dispensation. Does the maker of this video present this evidence? No... The maker of this video is not interested in a fair debate which weighs the actual evidence... Consider that fact while you weigh whether a person engaged in such dubious methods has pure motives. And if impure motives, then how are we to trust anything she says?

You can't prove them wrong, just as we can't prove we are right. That's where FAITH comes in.

I felt really sad reading your comment. I do hope you pray sincerely about it and by the intent of your heart, receive an answer and bring back that peace from the Spirit that indeed, this church is true.

@@nateypecks your leaders use you by tribalism. Don't you gave to donate money to them periodically or something

@@edgaraf9411 Um.... How would donating money make the organization or group tribal? Every organization accepts money... If I give money to more than one, then by your logic I'd be a member of two tribes which contrary to the definition of tribal.

Every man.Not a singular word.Sorry.

@@elainebeard1320 In contrast to the Mormon Church's teachings, the Bible has quite different things to say about priesthood. First, the Aaronic priesthood was limited to Jewish male members from the tribe of Levi who were descendants from Aaron (Ex. 28:1; Num. 3:5-13; Heb. 7:5). The priesthood was inherited by descent from Aaron, not received through ordination. It was never supposed to be practiced by Gentiles (non-Jews). There is absolutely no teaching about this doctrine of the Aaronic priesthood being practiced by Gentiles in the Old or New Testaments. Furthermore, the Aaronic priesthood was done away with through Christ as the final priest (Heb. 7:11-12) who fulfilled the Law as the eternal Priest (Heb. 7:11-28; 8:6-7ff). The Old Testament priests were mediators, but now Jesus is the only Mediator between men and God (1 Tim. 2:5; Heb. 7:24-25; Jn. 14:6). Therefore, there is no need for this Aaronic priesthood authority today. Finally, the High Priest in the Old Testament would enter the holy of holies once a year to make a sacrifice for sins of himself and others (Ex. 30:10; Heb. 9:7, 19-22). However, Jesus completed the work of salvation by being the High Priest and the sacrifice (Heb. 3:1; 9:11-12, 25-26)! Since Christ's work is finished (John 19:30), there is no need for a High Priest on this earth. Christ is the only mediator and High Priest in heaven (1 Tim. 2:5; Heb. 8:1-6). Melchizedek Priesthood Second, there is absolutely no mention in the entire Bible about a special class of Melchizedek priests. Melchizedek is mentioned briefly in the Old Testament in two places (Gen. 14:18-20 and Ps. 110:1). In Genesis 14, Melchizedek is a king and priest who blesses Abraham and to whom Abraham gives tithes. Psalm 110, a royal Messianic Psalm, applies this priesthood of Melchizedek to Jesus who is also a priest and king (cf. Matthew 22:44; 26:64; Mark 16:19; Heb. 5:5-6). However, nowhere in the Old or New Testaments do we see the practice of ordaining males to the office of the Melchizedek priesthood. Jesus alone is mentioned in the New Testament as a priest after the order of Melchizedek (Heb. 5:1-4ff). The Priesthood of All Believers Instead, the Bible teaches that all believers have priesthood authority (1 Peter 2:5, 9; Rev. 1:6; 5:10; 20:6). Even in the Old Testament, the nation of Israel was to be a kingdom of priests (Ex. 19:5-6). However, Jesus is the unique High Priest (Heb. 7:23-8:13). Each believer has the authority to preach the Gospel, baptize, and govern the kingdom of God on this earth. It is not something that is limited to males who are above the age of 12 or 18. carm.org/mormonism/priesthood-authority-and-mormonism

KEEP UP YOUR GOOD WORKS!

The link to this source and all these questions is found in the description section of this video and also many of my videos! 🙂 Then you can read it all for yourself or print it off, etc.

So you believe the bom is historically accurate and the boa is a false translation of common Egyptian funerary papyrus?

She has fooled you too. check her sources. She had changed words and is using opinion as doctrine.

Jesus said, "Except a man be born again he cannot see the kingdom of God." How would LDS's attack the clear teaching of Christ? Mormons are lovely. They are greatly deceived.

@@fayelewis5476 To those who have separated themselves from the Church, I say, my dear friends, there is yet a place for you here. Come and add your talents, gifts, and energies to ours. We will all become better as a result. Some might ask, “But what about my doubts?” It’s natural to have questions-the acorn of honest inquiry has often sprouted and matured into a great oak of understanding. There are few members of the Church who, at one time or another, have not wrestled with serious or sensitive questions. One of the purposes of the Church is to nurture and cultivate the seed of faith-even in the sometimes sandy soil of doubt and uncertainty. Faith is to hope for things which are not seen but which are true. Therefore, my dear brothers and sisters-my dear friends-please, first doubt your doubts before you doubt your faith. We must never allow doubt to hold us prisoner and keep us from the divine love, peace, and gifts that come through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. Some might say, “I just don’t fit in with you people in the Church.” If you could see into our hearts, you would probably find that you fit in better than you suppose. You might be surprised to find that we have yearnings and struggles and hopes similar to yours. Your background or upbringing might seem different from what you perceive in many Latter-day Saints, but that could be a blessing. Brothers and sisters, dear friends, we need your unique talents and perspectives. The diversity of persons and peoples all around the globe is a strength of this Church. Some might say, “I don’t think I could live up to your standards.” All the more reason to come! The Church is designed to nourish the imperfect, the struggling, and the exhausted. It is filled with people who desire with all their heart to keep the commandments, even if they haven’t mastered them yet. Some might say, “I know a member of your Church who is a hypocrite. I could never join a church that had someone like him as a member.” If you define hypocrite as someone who fails to live up perfectly to what he or she believes, then we are all hypocrites. None of us is quite as Christlike as we know we should be. But we earnestly desire to overcome our faults and the tendency to sin. With our heart and soul we yearn to become better with the help of the Atonement of Jesus Christ. If these are your desires, then regardless of your circumstances, your personal history, or the strength of your testimony, there is room for you in this Church. Come, join with us! - Dieter F. Uchthdorf

@tapir rider To those who have separated themselves from the Church, I say, my dear friends, there is yet a place for you here. Come and add your talents, gifts, and energies to ours. We will all become better as a result. Some might ask, “But what about my doubts?” It’s natural to have questions-the acorn of honest inquiry has often sprouted and matured into a great oak of understanding. There are few members of the Church who, at one time or another, have not wrestled with serious or sensitive questions. One of the purposes of the Church is to nurture and cultivate the seed of faith-even in the sometimes sandy soil of doubt and uncertainty. Faith is to hope for things which are not seen but which are true. Therefore, my dear brothers and sisters-my dear friends-please, first doubt your doubts before you doubt your faith. We must never allow doubt to hold us prisoner and keep us from the divine love, peace, and gifts that come through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. Some might say, “I just don’t fit in with you people in the Church.” If you could see into our hearts, you would probably find that you fit in better than you suppose. You might be surprised to find that we have yearnings and struggles and hopes similar to yours. Your background or upbringing might seem different from what you perceive in many Latter-day Saints, but that could be a blessing. Brothers and sisters, dear friends, we need your unique talents and perspectives. The diversity of persons and peoples all around the globe is a strength of this Church. Some might say, “I don’t think I could live up to your standards.” All the more reason to come! The Church is designed to nourish the imperfect, the struggling, and the exhausted. It is filled with people who desire with all their heart to keep the commandments, even if they haven’t mastered them yet. Some might say, “I know a member of your Church who is a hypocrite. I could never join a church that had someone like him as a member.” If you define hypocrite as someone who fails to live up perfectly to what he or she believes, then we are all hypocrites. None of us is quite as Christlike as we know we should be. But we earnestly desire to overcome our faults and the tendency to sin. With our heart and soul we yearn to become better with the help of the Atonement of Jesus Christ. If these are your desires, then regardless of your circumstances, your personal history, or the strength of your testimony, there is room for you in this Church. Come, join with us! - Dieter F. Uchthdorf

@@fayelewis5476 In spite of our human imperfections, I am confident that you will find among the members of this Church many of the finest souls this world has to offer. The Church of Jesus Christ seems to attract the kind and the caring, the honest and the industrious. If you expect to find perfect people here, you will be disappointed. But if you seek the pure doctrine of Christ, the word of God “which healeth the wounded soul,” and the sanctifying influence of the Holy Ghost, then here you will find them. In this age of waning faith-in this age when so many feel distanced from heaven’s embrace-here you will find a people who yearn to know and draw closer to their Savior by serving God and fellowmen, just like you. Come, join with us! - Dieter F. Uchthdorf

@tapir rider In spite of our human imperfections, I am confident that you will find among the members of this Church many of the finest souls this world has to offer. The Church of Jesus Christ seems to attract the kind and the caring, the honest and the industrious. If you expect to find perfect people here, you will be disappointed. But if you seek the pure doctrine of Christ, the word of God “which healeth the wounded soul,” and the sanctifying influence of the Holy Ghost, then here you will find them. In this age of waning faith-in this age when so many feel distanced from heaven’s embrace-here you will find a people who yearn to know and draw closer to their Savior by serving God and fellowmen, just like you. Come, join with us! - Dieter F. Uchthdorf

Oh, I'm glad to hear this. I have about 55 videos all concerning Mormonism and Biblical Christianity so I hope you'll give the rest of my channel a look. God--the One, true God of the Bible--loves you and cares about your eternal soul! You are precious and loved. Please don't give up on God because Mormonism taught a false version of Him. 💞

I sincerely hope you don’t go down the path of so many other Mormons I know that have left the church. I know you’ve found some answers to a lot of questions that you had, but be prepared because you just lost the answers to questions you never had before. The answers you had don’t corespondent to mainstream Christianity and you are going to have dozens of questions that can no longer be answered. Please please PLEASE don’t let that lead you away from God. Just because you might not have all the answers doesn’t mean that He doesn’t exist. He does exist and He loves YOU. He knows your heart and He knows you are only doing what you truly believe is right. Just keep in open mind just incase later on down the road you find something that leans you back towards the LDS church. I hope your family understands that you’re only doing what you feel is right. 👍

@@davislarsen7132 thank you. It was being introduced to some Christian preachers that I enjoyed and then reading the Bible with new eyes that led me here. I am closer to God. I definitely have things to unlearn and relearn the correct doctrine, but I’ve been surprised at how much sense the new answers have made to me. It has made the transition easier.

We still must meet God someday soon so please consider Jesus. Don't forget to ask God to show you what He wants you to know, ask Him to show you in His Word the Truth, and then read the Gospel of John and Romans and if God has not spoken to you through His Word when you have read through those Books. Then again ask God to show you, God must see that you are sincere and that you have a contrite heart, when He sees your heart is humbled and you wish to know His Word more than anything else on Earth, He will open your minds eye so you will be able to see more clearly what the Truth is. I am not saying to wait to have a burning in the bosom because the Bible does not say that at all. You will know because He promises if you believe in Him, He will give you His Peace. Jesus finished the work on the cross and all we need to do is believe that and give God Thanks for sending His Son to die for you.

I caught Jessie changing words to make her arguments better and taking unofficial opinions and making them sound like doctrine. Beware!

As listed in the description of this video as well as the top pinned comment, these questions were compiled and listed by Pastor Taylor and I've shared the source link. I've done plenty of research on these specific questions and doctrinal problems within Mormonism but I don't take any credit for compiling this list. And no, I'm not ex-Mormon.

Yes, read The Creator and the Cosmos by astrophysicist Hugh Ross or go to Reasons to Believe at Reasons. org.

@@davidjanbaz7728 I'm a believer. But you didn't understand the question. Do you think Genesis 1 is describing a spinning ball in outer space?

Nice. I have asked them who created their god who was once a man. Nobody knows.

If you mean the 10 commandments they would say Moses wrote them. Jesus quoted the Old Testament to give the two great commandments, but later added one not found there, to love one another as I have loved you.

@@PhdAAA Moses didn't create the Ten Commandments. He translated it according to what God told him. I guess poor word choice on my part but my first question still stands....if God was once a man of flesh and bone and became "God" by following the Gospel (as the Book of Mormon states), then who created the Gospel? How can he possibly become God when in the Bible (specifically Old Testament) it states "there will be no God before or after me, I am the one and only. I am eternal". It's odd that Mormons say the Book of Mormon is more accurate than the Bible yet no archeological evidence has ever been of the Book (the Gold Plates) AND many archeologists have said civilizations during the time when Jesus visited "America" prove the Book of Mormon to be false.

@@ferg9401, are you sure archaeologists discovered proof that the Book of Mormon is false? Most people that jump to conclusions about archaeologists disproving a faith, wouldn’t have a need to ask people of that faith about their deep doctrine because they would not be open minded enough to believe in it. It wouldn’t benefit one knowing the deepest doctrine, if they aren’t willing to learn about or keep the simplest commandments, by following the example of Jesus Christ. This could also be applied to any other faith or religion. The Book of Mormon actually doesn’t teach that doctrine, but it does hold water in modern revelation, as taught in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I imagine there are many LDS like me who know the answers to these questions you have, of where did God and the commandments come from. However, from the claims and conclusions you already made, If I gave an explanation, you would likely make fun of my beliefs (Matthew 7:6) and ultimately it wouldn’t do you any good (1 Corinthians 3:2). It just doesn’t seem like you sincerely want to know, or would be able to apply this knowledge to improve your life, if you found out. Please let me know if I’ve misread your post or misjudged what you are trying to say here about my beliefs.

Maricela daini I didn’t say archeologists have found evidence to prove the Book of Mormon to be false. I’m saying there’s a lack of evidence to proof it’s a true doctrine. Numerous archeologists have said the “historical” landmarks and tribes and people that are spoken of in the Book Of Mormon didn’t exist during the time of of the supposed person Mormon. I am less likely to believe a religious text is accurate or even real if there is lack of evidence or no evidence at all of said people and landmarks in that religious text. As for you saying you have the answers I seek, I am genuinely curious. I’m not going to mock you but I will correct you if your answers have already been debunked by others

You are mixing up doctrine. Christ is the ultimate judge of every person who has ever lived on the earth because he is the one who suffered for our sins. He knows us intimately. I don't know if Journal of discourses is completely correct because it is not an official church document, but if Joseph Smith is standing at the head of the celestial Kingdom I personally will give him a hu for restoring the amazing gospel that I have today

@@misssue1824 Not mixing up doctrine, just pointing to the flawed doctrine of the Mormon Church. JS was a wolf in sheep's clothing, leading many people astray. Study your Bible, and it will shed a light on all the additional writings of men, including JS.

@@rwd2213 Do you believe in the Holy Spirit? If so, what does that Spirit do for us?

@misssue1824 But the anointing which ye have received from Him abideth in you, and ye have no need that any man teach you. But as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in Him. 1 John 2:27

@@rwd2213 Have you taken the time to actually study those additional writings and see how beautifully they mesh with and clarify the contradictions in the Bible? For example, I see people still arguing over the nature of the Trinity. I haven't met a Christian yet who can explain salvation without ignoring Mark 16:16 and all of Acts; John 6:28; 1 Cor 13:1-14; etc.

it's not my place to comment on this subject, but i'm going to anyway. debate people, are people who are willing to set up the event to "go for the juglar". in all honesty, does jessie seem like the kind of person who wants to crush her opponent, and then not only crush him but go for the juglar? really? or don't you really see her as a person who woud be more inclined to extend a nurturing hand to someone in need? if you want to see a mormon completely crushed, and then splayed out on the floor, with nothing left to defend against the juglar attack, watch the kwaku debate: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gLKEjJqjstm5k4U.html that's really not jessie imho. i don't know why people challenge her, when that's just not what she's about. of course i only see her as she presents herself on video. i could be wrong. she could be a wollf in sheeps clothing thirsting for blood at the first sign of weakness. but i dont think i'm wrong in this case.

the 10 commandments say i am jehovah your eloheim. but mormons have at least 3 gods. one called jehovah and one called eloheim. you see it in their temple. they're pagans. what can you say?

Elohim is not God's name. Joseph smith simply didn't study enough Hebrew before having that "revelation". It's the Hebrew word for "gods" plural. "El" is "god" as in a god, a divine being. Not GOD as in the name modern day Christians give to theirs as if he's the only one ever. The God of Israel's name was Yahweh. Even "El" is a borrowed word though from....Sumerians I think? Ask a rabbi. But Jehovah isn't god's name either. That's a Germanic version of Yahweh. As already mentioned Jews wouldn't say god's name so they wedged in Adonis sometimes. The Masorites even stuck... Heck, it will take too long. But look it up. Jehovah is a made up word from a few centuries ago that people have mistaken for god's name. In the case of Mormons they think it's Jesus' name. But it can't be. Because someone made that name up as part of the attempt to hide Yahweh so people wouldn't read it out. So yeah. It's worth a quick read. Apparently even the Jehovahs Witnesses have accepted Jehovah isn't the right name and that is a made up modern word. But they don't want to rebrand. So much for inerrancy...

you may have to beef up your question. i don't understand it and i'm sure other people don't understand it. short answer: mormons used to believe that adam michael and ancient of days are names applied to the same person. D&C 27.11. they kind of still believe it today, but kind of definitely are ashamed of the old style doctrine and disavow it. adam was named adam by god. meaning god pulled adam's strings, adam didn't pull god's strings. adam named all the creatures of the garden, meaning adam pulled the strings over wild beasts. what is in a name? jacob and israel occupy the same body. jacob is weak carnal corrupt. we speak of the blessings of israel not the blessings of jacob. there are also name titles in the old testament i.e. jehhovah jireh. adam is not a name title.

@@longnamenocansayy The Bible doesn't make it clear that Adam and Michael the Archangel are the same person. But the bible does make it clear that Michael the Archangel is God. He is the voice who resurrects the dead. He is the man that Joshua bowed down and worshiped before the battle of Jericho.

@@miked9405 thanx for the reply.

​@@longnamenocansayy Ofcourse :) By the way I love the Devil.

@@miked9405 a lot of people do. i don't

Another person who didn't check Jessie's sources. She changed words and took opinions and treated them like church doctrine. Let's see. Who uses deceit?

Mike is smart and gutsy. His temple videos are wow

His temple videos are voyeurism

@@matthewchamberlain2953 They exposed what needed to be exposed.

another big one is, you're not spiritual enough. also, they are not spiritual enough for example, the reason you can't understand how the book of mormon preaches one god, and the D&C preaches plurality is because you're not spiritual enough. ask an institute of religion teacher "why don't we just translate the rest of what joseph smith had for the book of abraham, and we'll prove to the world that joseph smith really was a prophet" the short answer is, " you're not spiritual enough to understand the ways of the bretheren. if you were spiritual enough you would see their ways are always inspired of god." also "they're not spiritual enough to be able to discern the things of god. that's why they can't translate the book of abraham properly." alternate route: " do you believe the church is true, or are you testing the prophet? translation: "are we going to have to hold a bishop's court for you?" you say, "oh yes oh yes i definitely believe the church is true." translation "no, i'm really not looking for a bishop's court." " well okay what need do we have to challenge the world. we know what it'll lead to." translation: "they challenged us at mountain meadows and lost (lost because god was not with them) and then they had to resort to unfair practices to win, and god doesn't expect us to sacrifice unnecessarily ". also implied, "you won't like it as a gentile, believe me, you wont like it as a gentile. for one thing your family will disown you. i'll see to that myself." why do some people accept the gospel but others can't see it. answer: "only the most spiritual on earth accept the gospel. we were all spiritual in the pre existence, but we're further tested on earth. only the most spiritual accept the gospel on this earth, with the expectation of blessings in eternity." translation: "we've been watching you and we are watching you. don't make trouble or you will find yourself in a bishop's court." expectation of eternal blessings, means yummy sex. "if you want to live for eternity as a celebate drone just keep asking questions." "no no i'm fine i'm fine. just a passing thought." note" just the threat of life without sex for a sixteen year old boy is enough to pull him up straight right quick. i don't know what they threaten a 60 year old man with. no viagra? no more free feelys at the curtain in the temple? no more personal interviews alone with teen aged boys and girls? i hazard to guess.

Asking questions is allowed and we know what is false or not. God gave us basic intellect for a reason.

1, false prophecy concerning the temple in Independence. D&C 84 You should know all prophecy is based on an if, if you do this then this will happen. Our example would be Jonah, everyone repented and the city wasn't destroyed. In our case the Saints did not repent and the city was not built. However I think you are reading the passage wrong, it was given in Kirtland Ohio and not in Independence Missouri. Kirtland was one of the gathering places. D&C 82 "For I have consecrated the land of Kirtland in mine own due time for the benefit of the saints of the Most High, and for a stake to Zion" see also sec 37. Now look closely at the wording of sec 84, given Sept of 1832 ....the city of New Jerusalem/Zion Which city shall be built, beginning at the temple lot, ....in the western boundaries of the State of Missouri,....Verily this is the word of the Lord, that the city New Jerusalem shall be built by the gathering of the saints, beginning at this place, (Kirtland) even the place of the temple, which temple shall be reared in this generation. For verily this generation shall not all pass away until an house shall be built unto the Lord, and a cloud shall rest upon it, which cloud shall be even the glory of the Lord, which shall fill the house." The actual command to build the Kirtland Temple was given a year later on August 2 of 1833, and is found in sec 94 . It was built and the Lord appeared there. But what of the city of Zion? Technically it does not say the city will be built in that generation but the early Church members seemed to think it would. In sec 63 there is a command to purchase the land where Zion will be built and this prophecy is attached to it; 30 And if by purchase, behold you are blessed; 31 And if by blood, as you are forbidden to shed blood, lo, your enemies are upon you, and ye shall be scourged from city to city, and from synagogue to synagogue, and but few shall stand to receive an inheritance And that is exactly what happened. Instead of raising a white flag and trying to negotiate a peace David Whitmer and group armed themselves. They confronted a mob and the shooting commenced leaving several dead. Blood was spilled Zion was lost and the church was driven clear out to Utah. Both Prophecies fulfilled.

If I was absutely convinced that Mormonism held the truth and it was logically and systematically consistent and coherent, I would 100% accept it. But because I know that's not the case through study, research and testing it against the Bible, I have to reject it as a false religion.

2, life on the sun and moon This is typical of anti Mormon propaganda, it's out of context. In the first place "I rather think" is not a "Thus saith the Lord" kind of statement. He wasn't proclaiming a prophetic new revelation but giving an opinion, through a glass darkly. "So it is with regard to the inhabitants of the sun. Do you think it is inhabited? I rather think it is. Do you think there is any life there? No question of it; it was not made in vain." His pondering never made it into canonized scripture, it never ended up being taught at his own University, BYU. No one ever took his musing seriously. The concept of photosynthesis wasn't understood until the late 1890s. Except for giving us light and warmth Young would not have understood it makes our oxygen possible, thus it wasn't made in vain. Secondly his point wasn't really about that. He was saying with every new idea in science and philosophy no matter how true it is, it will first be rejected by the establishment. He used Galileo as his example, the man was imprisoned for his new truth. Brigham goes on to say he would want to know if an idea he had was wrong, even his religion.

3, yep he said it. 3, Adam God First, the Journal of Discourses is not canonized scripture. They've even found some big mistakes in it, so not real reliable. But Young did have his own pet theory, which wasn't scriptural at all. I've read nearly everything I can on the subject and what I noticed was, not too many others were teaching it. Even Heber C Kimball who people like to quote wasn't teaching exactly what Brigham Young was. John Taylor the next prophet was writing books saying the opposite and Parly Pratt was openly opposing Young. Willford Woodruff kept a diary where he wrote it all down but he never publicly said how he felt about it until Young was dead. He didn't believe it. So why would God allow his prophet to believe something not true? I try to keep a Bible standards for judging. Jonah thought he could run away to some other nation and God wouldn't be able to find him😮. If Brigham did something wrong God will judge him, not me.

@@itsmejessie I was witnessed to by a very nice lady many years ago. I realized I really didn't know my Bible, oh I knew the stories but I had never studied it like I should have. So I bought a Strongs Bible Concordance and started at, "In the beginning". I went pretty much word by word looking up the meaning. I know the Bible better than the Book of Mormon. I'm still learning new things like what the Greek word Pistis/faith really meant in 50 AD. The difference between us are the Christian Creeds and prior assumptions which we both make. I read the Bible more literally than you. If I read God made man in his image and likeness, then I can believe that. You have to filter it through the Creeds. The Creeds have turned God into an invisible genderless immaterial incomprehensible substance so you have to assume we aren't in fact made in his image. You have to invent some other meaning to the words Moses wrote. Even Strongs has its problems because it looks at words through late Christian meanings, 300 ad rather than 50 AD when Paul and James were writing. The Greek word pisteuō means to believe in something however the Greek word pistis means to make a vow, to pledge allegiance to something. One website I went to says it means to make a vow in a covenant relationship. That totally changed what Paul was saying in Ephesians 2. Go read it and replace faith with vow. "One Lord, one vow one baptism

Your prayers are in vain because many Christians have finally realized the inconsistencies and divisons within Christianity, even regarding critical doctrines, and have come to a saving faith with the one and only true Jesus Christ, and have joined his one and only true Church, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. Miracles never cease!

@@goingtothetop55 God will be the judge of my prayers - not LDS doctrine. Tell me, which of the over 100 Mormon splinter groups do you belong? Do you follow the unaltered teachings of Joseph Smith? If so then Warren Jeffs is your living prophet. Is it LDS doctrine to be a perverted child molester? Also, would you kill for your LDS god, if your prophet told you to? The fraud of the Mormonite faith never ceases!

@@maxwellsilverhammer9233 *_Do you follow the unaltered teachings of Joseph Smith? If so then Warren Jeffs is your living prophet_* Joseph Smith never said to marry as many women as you can, and put all your children on government welfare and turn your wives and children into virtual slaves, then kick out the healthy teen age boys so there's no competition for the young girls. Joseph SMith never put beds in the temple so that he could have sex with every women who got married there, no matter who she got married to. *_would you kill for your LDS god, if your prophet told you to_* No LDS prophet ever ordered anyone to kill anyone.

lindalds www.utlm.org/onlineresources/sermons_talks_interviews/jofdvol4p215_221brighambloodatonement.htm Brigham young says to spill their blood on the ground. I would call that killing. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigham_Young_and_the_Mountain_Meadows_massacre Might call that murder en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danite en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nauvoo_Legion Murdered people there

lindalds en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Smith_and_the_criminal_justice_system Also arrested for conspiracy to commit murder several times. You can read his statements on telling others to kill someone and saying it’s justified by god. Also lots of banking crimes where others lost all their money and Joseph got rich hmmmmm. Prophet of god and banker/land prospector (he happened to have land for sale by “Zion” when god told him it was Missouri) shop owner/steam boat operator. Joseph also had people destroy property of those that opposed him.

Well, that would never happen, even if plural marriage were re-established. Besides, what's with the "spiritual babies"?

@@lindalds What's with everything else?

@@diarrheadan8088 That's what I said. Even if plural marriage were re-established, what he said would never happen. And there's no such thing as "spiritual babies".

that is not how it has ever worked...

@tapir rider some of these questions were worth considering like I said. That's kinda one of them. However, it's kinda silly to base whether or not you believe in a religion exclusively on archeological data.

@tapir rider I dunno. I can say similar things about the old testament

@tapir rider either way, that's something to consider. but that doesn't suddenly make the other 30 questions that were stupid suddenly valid

@tapir rider I was eating either way that the archeology thing is a genuine critique of the religion. A lot of the questions were either untrue, misinformed, outdated, or out of context. However the archaeology thing is a decent critique. So please get your panties out of a knot cuz I was agreeing with you.

@tapir rider my critique was over the overall video. Not on mormonism. So if doesn't matter if one of these questions was really good. That's twenty minutes of filler crap that makes people think untrue things about the religion. I'm fine with judging mormons but don't make up things like God had sex with Mary.

💕💕💕

Their only tough questions if your ignorant.

I get a burning in my bosom when I watch Jason Mamoa on screen, but I know its not meant to be. Funny how that works. 😉

The gospel of Jesus Christ is that the only way to be made right with God is through Jesus Christ and the blood He shed on the cross through Calvary, not by temple work, ordinances, commandments, tithing, doing good works, going to church, baptism, facing Mecca, lying on beds of nails, fasting, etc.. Romans 3:28 For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law. Titus 3:5 He saved us, not on the basis of deeds which we have done in righteousness, but according to His mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewing by the Holy Spirit, Galatians 2:16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified. Eternal life is a free gift. Romans 6:23 For the wages of sin is death, but the FREE GIFT of God is eternal life through Christ Jesus our Lord. Romans 3:24 being justified as a GIFT by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus; Eph. 2:8-9 For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the GIFT of God; 9 not as a result of works, so that no one may boast. Jesus Christ canceled the record of debt that was held against us. All you need to do is accept Christ by faith. It isn't because of who you are and what you have done for God. It is because of who He is and what He did for you in sending Jesus to be the sacrificial offering for your sins. To be your substitute on the cross and to satisfy the demands of God's law that stands against you. Christ has done the one work that was necessary to reconcile you to God. Christ has done the one act of righteousness that could bring justification and life to all men. All Christ is asking with open arms is for you to lay down your religiosity and works at the foot of the cross and allow Christ to take it. Salvation is quite simple. Luke 18 And He also told this parable to some people who trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and viewed others with contempt: 10 “Two men went up into the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. 11 The Pharisee stood and was praying this to himself: ‘God, I thank You that I am not like other people: swindlers, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. 12 I fast twice a week; I pay tithes of all that I get.’ 13 But the tax collector, standing some distance away, was even unwilling to lift up his eyes to heaven, but was beating his breast, saying, ‘God, be merciful to me, the sinner!’ 14 I tell you, this man went to his house justified rather than the other; for everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, but he who humbles himself will be exalted.” I know that my sins have been forgiven. I already have eternal life. I know for sure that when I die I will be with my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. "Absent from the body, present with the Lord." I have the Holy Spirit living inside of me testifying of these truths. Eph. 1 :13 In Him, you also, after listening to the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation-having also believed, you were sealed in Him with the Holy Spirit of promise, This is my testimony based on the word of God. I challenge you to read your Bible as a child.

Murder is not an unforgivable sin. Moses murdered two men and King David murdered Uriah. Murder does not limit any eternal future. God said that King David was a man after His own heart. Acts 13:22 God raised up David to be their king, of whom he testified and said, ‘I have found in David the son of Jesse a man after my heart, who will do all my will.’ Here is what God said about Moses. Since that time no prophet has risen in Israel like Moses, whom the Lord knew face to face, 11 for all the signs and wonders which the Lord sent him to perform in the land of Egypt against Pharaoh, all his servants, and all his land, 12 and for all the mighty power and for all the great terror which Moses performed in the sight of all Israel. Psalm 51 The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit; A broken and a contrite heart, O God, You will not despise. I John 1:7 the blood of Jesus His Son cleanses us from all sin. (including murder) ******** The unpardonable/unforgivable sin or “blasphemy of the Holy Spirit” is mentioned in Mark 3:22-30 and Matthew 12:22-32. Jesus said, “Truly I tell you, people can be forgiven all their sins and every slander they utter” (Mark 3:28), but then He gives one exception: “Whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven; they are guilty of an eternal sin” (verse 29). According to Jesus, the unpardonable or unforgivable sin is unique. It is the one iniquity that will never be forgiven (“never” is the meaning of “either in this age or in the age to come” in Matthew 12:32). The unforgivable sin is blasphemy (“defiant irreverence”) of the Holy Spirit in the context of the Spirit’s work in the world through Christ. In other words, the particular case of blasphemy seen in Matthew 12 and Mark 3 is unique. The guilty party, a group of Pharisees, had witnessed irrefutable evidence that Jesus was working miracles in the power of the Holy Spirit, yet they claimed that He was possessed by the prince of demons, Beelzebul (Matthew 12:24; Mark 3:30). The Jewish leaders of Jesus’ day committed the unpardonable sin by accusing Jesus Christ (in person, on earth) of being demon-possessed. They had no excuse for such an action. They were not speaking out of ignorance or misunderstanding. The Pharisees knew that Jesus was the Messiah sent by God to save Israel. They knew the prophecies were being fulfilled. They saw Jesus’ wonderful works, and they heard His clear presentation of truth. Yet they deliberately chose to deny the truth and slander the Holy Spirit. Standing before the Light of the World, bathed in His glory, they defiantly closed their eyes and became willfully blind. Jesus pronounced that sin to be unforgivable. The blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, specific as it was to the Pharisees’ situation, cannot be duplicated today. Jesus Christ is not on earth, and no one can personally see Jesus perform a miracle and then attribute that power to Satan instead of the Spirit. The only unpardonable sin today is that of continued unbelief. There is no pardon for a person who dies in his rejection of Christ. The Holy Spirit is at work in the world, convicting the unsaved of sin, righteousness, and judgment (John 16:8). If a person resists that conviction and remains unrepentant, then he is choosing hell over heaven. “Without faith it is impossible to please God” (Hebrews 11:6), and the object of faith is Jesus (Acts 16:31). There is no forgiveness for someone who dies without faith in Christ. God has provided for our salvation in His Son (John 3:16). Forgiveness is found exclusively in Jesus (John 14:6). To reject the only Savior is to be left with no means of salvation; to reject the only pardon is, obviously, unpardonable. www.gotquestions.org/unpardonable-sin.html

If anyone sees his brother committing a sin not leading to death, he shall ask and God will for him give life to those who commit sin not leading to death. There is a sin leading to death; I do not say that he should make request for this. 17 All unrighteousness is sin, and there is a sin not leading to death. These verses do not say that murder is unforgivable. The sin that does not lead to death that is, eternal death or damnation is any sin that we commit that we are, by grace, capable of truly confessing and repenting from.

@@christophergpark193 There is no confusion. Your testimony would sound great, except for the fact that the Christ you are trusting in is not the Christ that is spoken of in the Bible. The true Christ is an uncreated being who has always existed with God the Father from all eternity. He is our Creator and in fact created Lucifer. Christ is both God and man. He is 100% God and 100% man. John 1 1. In the beginning was the Word (Christ), and the Word was with God, and the Word (Christ) was God. 2 Christ was in the beginning with God. 3 All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being. Jesus Christ existed before Lucifer. John 17:5 Now, Father, glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory which I had with You before the world was. Micah 5:2 “But as for you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, Too little to be among the clans of Judah, From you One will go forth for Me to be ruler in Israel. His goings forth are from long ago, From the days of eternity.” John the Baptist, who was six months older than Jesus, said Jesus existed before he did. John 1 John testified about Him and cried out, saying, “This was He of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has a higher rank than I, for He existed before me.’” Christ created Lucifer Col. 1:16 For by Jesus all things were created in heaven and on earth, [things] visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities; all things were created and exist through Him and for Him. ****** President Hinckley, the prophet and revelator of the Mormon church, has publicly declared that the Jesus of Mormonism and traditional Christianity are not the same. "In bearing testimony of Jesus Christ, President Hinckley spoke of those outside the Church who say Latter-day Saints 'do not believe in the traditional Christ.' 'No, I don't. The traditional Christ of whom they speak is not the Christ of whom I speak. For the Christ of whom I speak has been revealed in this the Dispensation of the Fullness of Times. He together with His Father, appeared to the boy Joseph Smith in the year 1820, and when Joseph left the grove that day, he knew more of the nature of God than all the learned ministers of the gospel of the ages.'" (LDS Church News Week ending June 20, 1998, p. 7). In Mormonism, Jesus is a creation, the product of relations between god and his goddess wife who used to be people from another world (McConkie, Bruce, Mormon Doctrine, p. 192, 321, 516, 589). Jesus is the literal spirit brother of the devil and you and I (McConkie, p. 192, 589). Also, in Mormon theology, God has a body of flesh and bones (Doctrine & Covenants 130:22) as does his wife, and together they produce spirit offspring in heaven who inhabit human bodies on earth. The Mormon Jesus The literal son of god and his goddess wife begotten in the pre-existence. The brother of all spirits born in heaven in the premortal existence. One of 3 gods in the godhead. The Trinity is three separate gods. First one to receive a spirit body Atoned for sin on the cross and in the garden of Gethsemane. The Christian Jesus Not the literal son of god and his goddess wife. Not the brother of all spirits born in heaven in a premortal existence. Not one of 3 gods in the godhead. The Trinity is 3 persons in one God Was always spirit from eternity. Atoned for sin on the cross alone. This brief comparison should help you see the difference between the two view of Christ. Jesus cannot be both the literal sexually begotten son of god and not the literal sexually begotten son. He cannot be both one of 3 gods and not one of 3 gods. They are different. The apostle Paul warned of people who would preach another Jesus. II Corinthians 11 But I am afraid that, as the serpent deceived Eve by his craftiness, your minds will be led astray from the simplicity and purity of devotion to Christ. 4 For if one comes and preaches another Jesus whom we have not preached, or you receive a different spirit which you have not received, or a different gospel which you have not accepted, you bear this beautifully. You need to have the right Christ in order to get into the kingdom of heaven.

@@christophergpark193 That is quite a blanket statement. Basically no one has eternal life. Everyone who hates his brother is a murderer; and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him Who hasn't hated someone? I am sure John did not mean to say that no one has eternal life. We need to look at it more closely in context or even go back to the Greek. Here is the Amplified Version. John is talking to fellow Christians, not unbelievers. Believers should not be hating other believers. Non Christians/unbelievers could not be called, 'brothers' and 'sisters.' 'Believers' who hate other believers are really, 'the world' or unbelievers. They do not have eternal life. Do not be surprised, believers, if the world hates you. 14 We know that we have passed out of death into Life, because we love the brothers and sisters. He who does not love remains in [spiritual] death. 15 Everyone who hates (works against) his brother [in Christ] is [at heart] a murderer [by God’s standards]; and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him. The good news is that the blood of Jesus Christ cleanses us from ALL sin. Journal of Discourses Jesus' sacrifice was not able to cleanse us from all our sins, (murder and repeated adultery are exceptions), (Journal of Discourses, vol. 3, 1856, p. 247). The Bible I John 1:7 but if we walk in the Light as He Himself is in the Light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus His Son cleanses us from ALL sin. I doubt that most Latter Day Saints follow what is in the Journal of Discourses, but it does say this.

I definitely do not agree with you.

The English had already changed by the time the America rolled around they had to make a revised version to update the english. Making it in old English was only pandering to the legacy of the kjv which was quite old and still popular during the time period.

How does sociology relate to biological genes?

Race is made up by only 0.9% by genetics. The rest is a social construct. The tie to sociology is the problem people think race is a big deal when it actually plays a small role in terms of biology.

Explain some of the lies of the LDS Church.

What would you say to people from other religions who also have these warm feelings? Some other mormon groups who are not LDS, also have them. You can't all be right.

Trust in the word of God and skip the satanic feelings...

I hear you, fellow Saint! I caught Jessie changing words to make her arguments better and taking unofficial opinion and making them sound like doctrine. Sure, that's the Christian thing to do.

Yes. The devil can mimic that energy. I used to be in the new age and I felt that energy. I was deciceived. I would encourage you to study the Word of God. God didn’t need to create a new gospel. The gospel is the same gospel that was preached in the day of Noah. Repent of your sins and turn back to God and follow His ways.

@@cherylburnett2014 Satan cannot ever mimic that energy. Ever. Satan subs fun for joy, a mindless haze for wisdom, and babbling for the powerful but still voice. What I have is the same gospel Noah preached. It was repent and follow God. It is Christ-centered. I strive to repent daily and know God's will. I would again tell you that Jessie does not follow Eph 4:29-32. Get both sides and don't just hop on an emotional bandwagon of bashing what you don't really understand.

Does the Lord blesses deceivers? Jessie didn't use the actual quotes on a lot of stuff. she changed a few crucial words. She quoted a passage from Paul about not marrying that very few live today, including her. Sheesh!

These are laughably shallow and petulent replies. You are amazed by your own depth, yet don't realize you are in the shallow end with waterwings on. At least point to other links, to far more thoughtful responses. This is sad.

@@joshua.snyder Are you kidding me. Those answers made perfect sense to anyone who actually cares about the truth. You Mormon Haters will never be happy with any answer that is given to you. You guys are so delusional that you actually think that we don't HAVE ANSWERS TO YOUR BRILLIANT QUESTIONS BECAUSE WE STUPID MORMONS JUST ARN'T THE DEEP THINKERS THAT YOU ARE. I couldn't help but notice how you didn't even try to point out why his argument were shallow. Instead you just went straight to belittling him. Because that Is how you anti Mormons do things.

I’m happy for your wife and children.

@@jeffreysmith7542 you tell 'im Jeff! Love how he just ignored you.

@@jeffreysmith7542 If you can truly believe mormon teachings it's not a matter of being deep or shallow It proves your propensity to be deceived is clearly evident

Because she is a hypocrite. Just like nearly all other anti Mormons.

No need for name calling, as an ex-mormon, now atheist, I know the power of indoctrination and the inability to see the flaws in a deeply rooted belief. My intent was to plant a seed of self-reflection, not to be hostile.

@@jeffreysmith7542 God you're a dumbass!

@Randall Layman If they decide that the church is false and then decide to speak out against it because they think it is evil. Than yes. That is what anti means isn't. Or do you have a different definition?

@@poetman2472 Thanks that was really informative. If your referring to my comment about Christians who are anti Mormons as being hypocrites than what I said was 100% true based on what Ivon Young said. Almost every one of these questions presented in this video, save it be a few has a twin argument against Christianity or the Bible directly. But anti Mormons who think that these questions prove the BoM to be false will quickly change their logic when thrown against the Bible.

the jews had priests, but they rejected the priests. so god sent prophets to tell them what would happen if they didn't change their ways. the jews had a king but they rejected their king and replaced him with a man who was foible. who was of the earth. long story short: if you're putting your faith in a man you are on the wrong track. be it priests, prophets, or kings. the book of james says if you need wisdom (to cope with life's unfairness, poverty etc.) ask god. james does not say run to a prophet. the bible is not a record of man's unfailing goodness. the bible is a record of weak man, filled with sin nature, and the unfailing goodness of god who is righteous. if you're putting your faith in the arm of flesh you are on the wrong track. putting your faith in a prophet who does not prophesy should be a big red flag to you.