Learning Lumatone: Episode 17 - "Lumatone + Pianoteq"

  Рет қаралды 2,404

Lumatone Keyboard

Lumatone Keyboard

2 жыл бұрын

When it comes to playing microtonally on Lumatone, Pianoteq is one of the most popular virtual instruments available. Dave walks you through how to set it up. Visit www.lumatone.io for more.
To download a demo of Pianoteq:
www.modartt.com/pianoteq
In the coming weeks and months, we'll be diving into more specific explorations of the features, uses, and capabilities of this beautiful new instrument.
...................
Learn more and order yours now:
www.lumatone.io
.....................
Follow us:
/ lumatone.keyboard
/ lumatone.keyboard
/ lumatonekeys

Пікірлер: 28
@PetMei00
@PetMei00 2 жыл бұрын
THAT really answered all my questions re. my Lumatone together with Pianoteq - thanks a lot!!
@lumatone
@lumatone 2 жыл бұрын
Happy to hear that :) Happy Lumatoning!
@tirelat
@tirelat 2 жыл бұрын
Instead of setting the diapason in Pianoteq, I use Scala .kbm files (keyboard map). You can set any MIDI note as the reference note and specify a frequency for it.
@nylonius
@nylonius 2 жыл бұрын
Below is a .kbm file (save this as .kbm in a text editor) that tunes MIDI note 60 to Middle C (262Hz). No need to check or calculate the diapason value for Midi note 69 etc. You can simply drop the .kbm file on the Pianoteq window and it does its job. -Always save your Lumatone tunings from the popup menu on Pianoteq's tuning page. The .kbm (or diapason), Full Rebuild, stretch settings and the Extended Layout settings are saved with the tuning preset. ! Size of map: 0 ! First MIDI note number to retune: 0 ! Last MIDI note number to retune: 127 ! Scale degree 0 is mapped to MIDI note: 60 ! Reference MIDI note for which frequency is given: 60 ! Frequency of the above MIDI note: 261.63 ! Scale degree to consider as formal octave: 0 ! Mapping:
@lumatone
@lumatone 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this Juhani! Very helpful
@mr88cet
@mr88cet 2 жыл бұрын
Go Dave! The Lumatone-Pianoteq combination has been absolutely amazing for me; I strongly recommend it for everybody. I have historically found more affinity toward woodwinds and guitar/lute. Keyboards never really “got me going,” so to speak, beyond just their historical and compositional prowess. However, Lumatone-Pianoteq really clicks in my brain and my hands. It’s a game-changer combination!
@amandacole6711
@amandacole6711 2 жыл бұрын
Brilliant video. This is exactly the info I need right now to set up 31 EDO with Pianoteq. Thanks
@mr88cet
@mr88cet 2 жыл бұрын
Oh, regarding your 311.13Hz for Diapason setting for 31TET. I've been using ~307Hz instead. Why? Because *that makes middle-A 440Hz* ! 311.13Hz may make sense for C, but it puts A at closer to 445Hz. The equivalent number for 19TET is 366.5Hz, for whatever it's worth. Absolute pitch is not a huge deal compared to relative pitch, of course, but I perceive that A=440Hz to be the International standard, so...
@cgibbard
@cgibbard Жыл бұрын
I usually map C to 261.62 myself. It doesn't make a huge difference, but it affects which keys your instrument in 31edo will be able to play along with instruments in 12edo. Maybe the most equitable choice would be to tune to D, since it's right in the middle of the naturals on the circle of fifths, but I find it slightly more intuitive somehow to be able to slightly prefer the flats as acting like the black keys on a 12edo keyboard, since in 31 equal you reach flatward for the more familiar minor intervals, and sharpward for septimal things anyway. Whatever you tune to, the discrepancy between the corresponding notes in 31edo and 12edo will be 1200 log_2(2^(18/31) / 2^(7/12)) = 1200 (18/31 - 7/12) = 100/31 = ~3.2 cents per step on the circle of fifths. So probably if you're playing along with other instruments in a serious way, you'd ideally tune to the tonic of whatever song you're playing, but I've found with any of these, you can usually find something close enough to jam along in any case.
@mr88cet
@mr88cet Жыл бұрын
@@cgibbard, of course A is only one P5 away from D…
@mr88cet
@mr88cet Жыл бұрын
@@cgibbard, I’ve been pondering this in the back of my mind. I personally don’t mix tuning systems much, but in that scenario, on the scale (😂) of entire compositions, does it really make a whole lot of difference whether any particular pitch is the same? Obviously, if you look at any one single isolated chord, yes, the differences will be significant. However, over the course of whole compositions, will it be any more specific and descript than just a feeling of “general blurriness” in the tuning? I guess it depends upon in how much detail you plan out the composition. If you compose every track with precise attention to the interrelationships - “here, we have a 31TET E with a 12TET G, so…” - then, that’s one thing so to speak. However, if you have one track freely improvising in 12TET and another “doodling around” in 31TET, then I’m inclined to think it won’t make all that much difference whether your Cs match or your As match. It would sound somewhat like playing one part in 12TET and another in QC Meantone.
@cgibbard
@cgibbard Жыл бұрын
@@mr88cet Yeah, it's more about avoiding really dissonant commas where you don't want them. A few cents won't usually be an issue, but if you're 20 cents out in a way that's not contextually appropriate, that can be grating. Usually if you're in tune enough with yourself and you're in tune enough with the tonic, you'll be fine, but of course it's possible for small errors to stack and become noticeable. Also the speed of the wobbling of not-quite-aligned harmonics depends on the absolute pitch, so it can be really timbre and pitch dependent how noticeable things are.
@mr88cet
@mr88cet Жыл бұрын
@@cgibbard, roger! It’s probably also fair to say that it depends a lot upon the texture of the music you’re playing. If you’re playing two monophonic, contrapuntal melody lines, one in 12 and the other in 31, with typically an octave of space between them (kinda like the Bach Two-Part Inventions), then it’s probably not going to make a whole lot of difference whether their As match or their Cs match. That, especially if it modulates around a lot. On the other hand you’re playing dense, homophonic block-chords, then the whole setup is probably “more sensitive” to those sorts of cumulative errors - more opportunities for such errors to come up. Well, but then again, in the two-part counterpoint scenario, in the comparatively-rare cases when they do come up, they’ll probably be more exposed…
@mr88cet
@mr88cet 2 жыл бұрын
Aha! I was not aware of the multichannel-mapping option to get a 5-octave range. Seriously cool! I’ll have to try that this evening. To make the middle A play A=440, I’ve been using the frequency setting right next to the mu button, rather than the Diapason. It seems to have a similar effect.
@lumatone
@lumatone 2 жыл бұрын
Good call Gary, that will definitely come in use!
@cgibbard
@cgibbard 2 жыл бұрын
What I do with the diapason stuff is always to set middle C instead: set the diapason to 261.62 Hz (which you can just make the same for every tuning if you want), and then since midi note 0 and other multiples of n are usually mapped to C in n-EDO Lumatone layouts (at least that's how I do it), all you have to do is, using the dropdown, set the top note in the list of note tunings to some MIDI note number which is a multiple of n, (usually 2n is good) and click the left margin of that box, next to the little dropdown widget, and you should see it draw a line connecting that note to the diapason box. It's a pretty sneaky user interface, the thing you have to click to set which note the diapason corresponds to is invisible. But this saves you from really having to calculate anything tricky, and it means that if you're playing in keys near C on the circle of fifths, you can often play along with other instruments tuned to 12 equal without sounding out of tune. (If you want to really optimize that, I would recommend picking whatever the tonic itself is in the song you were playing to tune to.) It's also worth pointing out that depending on which multiple of n you pick to tune the diapason to, you get different octaves of course, so you can make a "baritone" or "soprano" version of the same tuning to have on hand in Pianoteq, if you want a different range.
@lumatone
@lumatone 2 жыл бұрын
Great tip Cale!
@nylonius
@nylonius Жыл бұрын
Which dropdown menu are you referring to? Where is "the list of note tunings"?
@cgibbard
@cgibbard Жыл бұрын
@@nylonius If you go to, say, 2:27 in the video, on the right side of the user interface there, there's a sort of list that starts out like "[C3] [- +] [ #0 ] 1/1", each row represents a MIDI note, which scale degree it's mapped to, and what interval that scale degree is as a just ratio, or in cents. That [C3] is clickable and drops down a list of MIDI notes. In anything but 12 divisions per octave, you should ignore the traditional letter names for the notes in it, but pay attention to the MIDI numbers which appear. Picking one will just change where that listing starts without affecting the tuning. But then, for instance, if we're in 31edo, you might pick MIDI note 2*31 = 62 in the dropdown, and then click the left margin of the box, just to the left of the button that once read [C3] and now reads [D3], and you should get a line that connects that note to the diapason below (you can see the line I'm talking about in the video, connecting the A3 note to the diapason -- clicking the left margin of that box will change which note the diapason is connected to). Then you can set the diapason to 261.62 (which is the standard tuning for middle C), and assuming that your mapping is like most of them, and suggests MIDI note 0 should be C, that'll make sure it's tuned correctly.
@nylonius
@nylonius Жыл бұрын
@@cgibbard Oh, excellent, thanks. I wasn't aware of the connect-note-to-diapason switch, or had forgotten about it. I usually have MIDI Note 60 = 261.6 Hz for my Lumatone tunings and I've set that with a .kbm file but this is even more handy! (Like .kbm file parameters, this midi-note-diapason connection is saved with a tuning preset.)
@mr88cet
@mr88cet 2 жыл бұрын
Another thing regarding the absolute-pitch setting (Diapason): I wanted to make a high-range 31TET piano sound, so I set it to double the 307Hz I use (614Hz -- actually closer to 614.5Hz). That worked. However, when I tried to create a lower-range piano sound, it didn't accept 153.5Hz. That setting has a lower-limit of 220Hz. I asked Pianoteq if they could lower that limit, perhaps to 110Hz. They replied that they'd consider it, and mentioned some ways to work around it, like using a Scala file.
@mr88cet
@mr88cet Жыл бұрын
Pianoteq 8 does indeed now allow 153.5Hz for the diapason, for a very-low-pitched instrument.
@integralsonic
@integralsonic 4 ай бұрын
with Pianoteq 8 the work around for the highest octave doesn't work, very frustrating. any help??
@epiphoney
@epiphoney Жыл бұрын
Yes, I figure scala .kbm files to set the mapping and the frequency.
@jqdavid2300
@jqdavid2300 Жыл бұрын
Is serum compatible with the different tunings?
@lumatone
@lumatone Жыл бұрын
It is fully microtonal capable yes, that's another great synth!
@jqdavid2300
@jqdavid2300 Жыл бұрын
@@lumatone Awesome!
@mr88cet
@mr88cet 2 жыл бұрын
When I think of Physical Modeling, I imagine a super-slow-motion video of strings vibrating, like in kzfaq.info/get/bejne/lb5nZdKfm6m3fGQ.html. Of course, what this shows is just a hypothetical string. Pianoteq mathematically simulates these motions in real-time, for real-world instruments, based upon the known materials, weights, stiffnesses, and so forth of the strings, and other physical properties of the instrument. So Pianoteq doesn’t play back samples or simulate the instrument *sounds* . It actually simulates *the entire instrument itself* !
Learning Lumatone: Episode 18 - "Lumatone + Surge XT"
6:43
Lumatone Keyboard
Рет қаралды 1,4 М.
Exploring Pianoteq: From Demo to Stress Test
25:27
Red Means Recording
Рет қаралды 9 М.
Sigma Kid Hair #funny #sigma #comedy
00:33
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 37 МЛН
Женская драка в Кызылорде
00:53
AIRAN
Рет қаралды 491 М.
Задержи дыхание дольше всех!
00:42
Аришнев
Рет қаралды 3,6 МЛН
Nastya and SeanDoesMagic
00:16
Nastya
Рет қаралды 34 МЛН
No, 12 aren't enough.
7:30
Hear Between The Lines
Рет қаралды 16 М.
Learning Lumatone: Episode 1 - "Overview"
10:10
Lumatone Keyboard
Рет қаралды 30 М.
Learning Lumatone: Ep. 25 - "53-EDO Basics"
8:00
Lumatone Keyboard
Рет қаралды 21 М.
Is PianoTeq 8 A Buy In 2024?
42:15
SamTheBeardGuy
Рет қаралды 17 М.
How to Use Microtones in Your Composing Workflow
12:04
Saad Haddad
Рет қаралды 1,7 М.
Sampled Pianos Vs Modeled Pianos, which one is better?
8:50
Saucy Sounds
Рет қаралды 2,6 М.
PolyChromatic Music with the Lumatone
16:31
dolomuse
Рет қаралды 49 М.
Learning Lumatone: Episode 21 - "19-EDO Basics"
8:31
Lumatone Keyboard
Рет қаралды 10 М.
Pianoteq 8 - Is this the Future? (yes I think so)
23:38
Mikael Baggström
Рет қаралды 60 М.
Malohat
3:35
Xamdam Sobirov - Topic
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
akimmmich (feat. Turar) - UMYTTYŃ BA?| official lyric video
2:54
akimmmich
Рет қаралды 4,9 МЛН
IL’HAN - Pai-pai (lyric video) 2024
3:24
Ilhan Ihsanov
Рет қаралды 759 М.
KeshYou x Snoop Dogg - Forever Sunday (Official Music Video)
3:06
BM PRODUCTION
Рет қаралды 167 М.
Kenjebek Nurdolday & Baller - sokpe#сокпе#сөкпе
3:10
Kenjebek Nurdolday
Рет қаралды 89 М.
Dj Jack SpaRRow - Akbar Ghalta Bahiati ( Slap Remix Arabic ) #TIKTOK
2:21
Dj Jack SpaRRow
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
Munisa Rizayeva - Aka makasi (Official Music Video)
6:18
Munisa Rizayeva
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН