The comparisons you do are by far the most helpful/informative side by sides I've seen. No gimmicks, no BS, just informative and very easy to watch/listen to. Thanks mate! Am picking up the Sigma 50mm Art second hand, so help you out by buying through affiliate link so dropped you a few $$ via the support link. Appreciate you work!
@MatthewGore8 жыл бұрын
Thanks Nathan :-)
@ienjoicomics1018 жыл бұрын
bro this is how you do a review. You killed this shit man, appreciate the time you spent on this!
@AllgoodthingsTv2 жыл бұрын
This was an exceptionally good comparison/review, and I say that having watched all of the major KZfaq photography channels. You even made the resolution and focus analysis technically engaging without a test chart with all those patterns on it. That Sigma ART lens is a winner.
@michaelgong2148 жыл бұрын
This is the best lens reviewer I ever seen! So informative!
@JBanchiere5 жыл бұрын
Him and Christopher Frost are my favorites.
@PatricPuola4 жыл бұрын
I'm somewhat new to photography but I've watched a lot of product reviews and comparisons. This should be a textbook example on how to do a short, concise and very informative review. A joy to watch.
@ohworldgirl8 жыл бұрын
The most comprehensive, straightforward and sensibly conscise video comparison on these two lenses out of the other five vids I've seen. Nice job. Thanks.
@tomrose20865 жыл бұрын
Superb. No annoying talking heads or funny mannerisms, hairstyles, T-shirts. No showing off the expensive studio and it equipment, no name-dropping, no poorly disguised allusions to how great and successful you are. No bias to any brand (i.e. no fanboyism!). Just good, useful information, presented in a clear and interesting way. And although the Sigma lens seems to be the winner on most of the things tested we can still decide in favour of the Canon (lighter, weather sealed) when what we want most is a beautifully blurred background and maximum subject-separation. For landscapes and cityscapes, we can use a slower (and cheaper!) lens that is better corrected at smaller apertures but that would be necessary only if it made any difference at the sizes we print or display.
@antraxxslingshots3 жыл бұрын
Good Comparison, thank you very much. My thoughs as i own the 85mm 1.2 and use it 85% of the time, at least: - Noise: doesn´t matter - Resolution: my 85mm 1.2 is cristal clear in the center, anything else doesn´t matter. Maybe i was just lucky. If you spend the extra buck because of 1.2 instead of 1.4 you (should) use it at 1.2 nearly all the time...if you use it at 1.4 mostly you bought the wrong lens. - Sealing: Matters! - Weight: Doensn´t matter - Vignette: lol i even like that, i add more in post - bad borders: doesn´t matter, this is no landscape or architecture Lense after all...and if you want to use it for that Stop 8 and Tripod are mandatory anyway. For my style it even helps if the center is the most importend section. - Bokeh: Next to sharp center the most important point. - Price: Does matter!
@channelforadifferentrecome6635Ай бұрын
Wow! it's 9 years later and you blow most lens review channels out of the water. This was a breath of fresh air, most lens reviews are just weekend cheer leaders for what ever lens they found on ebay recently that they can write a review about. I swear you could put a trash kit lens from the 2010 in front of them and they would celebrate it and pull buzz words out their ass like film-like and "it has character".
@garyyarber67118 жыл бұрын
Your review was spectacular. Most camera reviewers read spec sheets and press releases or discuss strengths and weaknesses without concrete real world examples. Your video is extremely professional and well produced and I learned something having watched it. Thanks for taking the time to create valuable and stimulating content. Being a Nikon user, I would like to see you use your abilities to talk about what you see as the advantages and disadvantages of the Sony, Canon, and Nikon systems as well as the mirrorless Olympus and Fujifilm offerings.
@davidecapri3 жыл бұрын
I have the sigma since three years and used it for a lot of jobs, extremely sharp lens, but it's too heavy (I use 50mm as my main lens for 95% of my pictures) and often has an unimpressive rendering, lacks a lot of pop and micro contrast. It's an old lens and everything but I find the Canon 50mm 1.2 to have a lot more character and microcontrast, I'm going to switch between the two. Then, if your main purpose is shooting landscapes wide open ok maybe sigma is a better choice, but for portraiture (and shooting people in general) there's no competition between the two. And, sigma 50mm is often inconsistent in focusing, at least my copy but I read that it's a really common issue, more likely than not.
@DarkstarDarth Жыл бұрын
My R6 and the canon 50mm 1.2 L really gives unique pics. The bokeh is legendary.
@MatthewGore Жыл бұрын
It's an awesome lens for bokeh, no doubt about that, and it's actually better on mirrorless, IMHO, since the direct focusing is more reliable with that shallow depth of field.
@Zwiesel669 жыл бұрын
Your comparison of image sharpness and quality is very nice and clear. I really appreciate that. Great video.
@GravityHazard9 жыл бұрын
You forgot to mention the main selling point of the cannon at least for me : Weather Sealing
@hmshs96838 жыл бұрын
This is one of the best lens reviews i've ever seen. I am a Sigma fan. I am now glad to see that Sigma beats Canon with most of the conditions and specs including much less price. I just discovered your channel but i will also watch other reviews in a short while. I can simply say i will recommend this review to all my friends who are insisting Canon is much more better than Sigma. I use sigma 35mm 1.4 art and 35mm is incredible lens for weddings, landscape or Daily Street photography. Once again thanks for this helpful review.
@carthik868 жыл бұрын
Best lens review I have ever watched, technical and evidence based. I usually don't comment on videos but had to let you know. Cheers,
@kaanaksoy25999 жыл бұрын
Matthew, your comparison is flawless! It is just another perfect review of yours. Thanks a lot.
@UTubesNameIsAShit4 жыл бұрын
It seems that I've just watched the best and all-round lens comparison in my life! Thank you, Matthew!
@MatthewGore4 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it :-)
@andreybessolitsyn20552 жыл бұрын
Now, in 2021, Canon 50mm 1.2 focuses just great with R-cameras! And its picture is better to my eyes.
@hudsoncaceres68203 жыл бұрын
The age of watching reviews that absolutely suck has ended. Thank you for this review, it definitely determined what I am going to purchase.
@BabakAzarian7 жыл бұрын
ive watched a looot of lens/camera reviews but this was so far the best, in depth, on point review ive ever watched
@otoburkaplan8 жыл бұрын
Wouv... No shitting around, just pure necessary info.. Congrats man.... What a good review...
@kailuasurfing3 жыл бұрын
Due to videos like these, you are my go to guy for lens comparisons. Thanks for this!
@MatthewGore3 жыл бұрын
Thanks, John, glad you find them useful!
@douglauson6 жыл бұрын
Great review - I'm looking seriously at the Sigma (my first non-Canon L lens), so I was a little concerned, but your review clearly shows that the Sigma is better.
@johnnypopstar7 жыл бұрын
This was bloody brilliant. Have been trying to find a replacement for my nifty fifty 1.8, because it's softer than the results of a particularly spicy curry, and the detail you go in to has helped convince me (after my own in-store test shots with it too, versus Canon's ~£300 1.4) that the Sigma is definitely a good deal at the price it's at now. Thanks for being so thorough!
@Just4jeannette8 ай бұрын
Same!
@Harkescreative5 жыл бұрын
Your reviews are better than some of FStoppers. Great work!
@MatthewGore5 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@aaronwalker42022 жыл бұрын
Great comparison video, I own the Sigma and gave my nifty fifty away. Sigma 50 is an amazing lens but is heavy as you pointed out. Thought about changing to a larger 1.2 aperture but this video has convinced me to continue bearing the weight. Sigma garners quite a few compliments on it’s appearance and the magazine quality photos. They can make an everyday pic look like a professional photoshoot product.
@njekin8 жыл бұрын
Another problem many review forgot to mention, sigma is actually darker than canon at the same aperture ISO shutter speed, about 2/3 stops maybe. Probably due to its lens coating.
@JBanchiere5 жыл бұрын
Dxomark shows Sigma transmission at 1.8 and canon at 1.5
@jhs92573 жыл бұрын
The best comparison I have ever seen on these two lenses.
@entertayne9 жыл бұрын
thank you, this is the best sigma 50 1.4 art review video on youtube
@itsmoneytoday8 жыл бұрын
Great review. You have quite the presentation. I have a Sigma 1.8 which I love. Thinking of selling the Canon lenses I have and get this the 1.4 I appreciate your efforts here!
@kevincarver47599 жыл бұрын
IMPORTANT! The Canon is actually longer than 50 and the Sigma is a true 50. Most big brand 50mm lenses are actually 51.something millimeters because that's just one of those photography things handed down from the past when 50mm lenses weren't precisely 50.
@DariarVisuals6 жыл бұрын
Seriously the best review I've ever seen. I wish all reviews were this good
@davidsovereign49583 жыл бұрын
This is the cream of reviews Matt. Thank you for not wasting our time. Subscribed for that fact alone! One question - in the later comparisons, you’ve listed both sides as Canon. Was that in error? You have Canon 50mm f/1.4 on the left and Canon 50mm f/1.2L on the right. Just curious. Thanks again for a STELLAR video. - David
@MatthewGore3 жыл бұрын
Hey David, Glad you liked it :-) Yes, this video was my first attempt at using chunks of previous videos as templates to speed up production, and it led to all sorts of errors like that. I fixed some of them and re-published the video (which is where the (fixed) part of the title came from, but I didn't catch everything. Back when this was published, KZfaq had a feature that allowed me to overlay the correct camera names, so I didn't need to upload a new copy, but that feature has since been disabled. Oh well :-) You probably got the general idea.
@davidsovereign49583 жыл бұрын
Matthew Gore - Thanks for answering back so quickly:) Yup, got the idea right away! I’m sold either way. Please keep the content coming if you can. Between you and Mark Bone, I’ll be up and running in no time. Thanks again Matt!✨
@CoyotePark6 жыл бұрын
Takes a soft portrait lens, tests it on sharp cityscape and forest :D I'd take the canon 50 1,2 any day for portraits and people! )
@babalyma8 жыл бұрын
Nice review but weather sealing forgotten (pros for cannon)
@photographybyjagadeesh98357 жыл бұрын
i think canon 50mm1.2l is for portrait not for other things don't you aware of that????
@kenjiyamamoto4235 жыл бұрын
its not for landscape
@tonyren68979 жыл бұрын
Thanks buddy. Really detailed comparison. Couldn't wait to see your next 1635IS review.
@joshlobel81117 жыл бұрын
just purchased the Sigma 50mm, thanks for the great review!
@MatthewGore7 жыл бұрын
Hey Josh, glad you found it useful :-) Enjoy the new lens!
@sujitmohanty28508 жыл бұрын
Very nice comparison. Really appreciate. But a lot of people use 50mm for indoor portraits where the sharpness matters in the subject area only. It would have been great to see some indoor portraits comparison. But thanks a lot for the nice comparison.
@DecvsJapan Жыл бұрын
So glad you included night shots mate.
@danmatthewmanphotography69199 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this excellent and detailed review. I like your systematic approach the review, a good pace to the commentary and clear crisp graphics on screen. The only thing I would change would be to see the vignetting examples individually rather than both at once, it's hard to focus on the detail on the two screens. This video is the best lens comparison of these two lenses I have seen. Thanks again!
@kairinaminemix6 жыл бұрын
the reviews you do keeps everything real and authentic to the lenses!
@dansuper61037 жыл бұрын
i can see the difference at 480p. how sad
@TheWarriorSolution4 жыл бұрын
You just saved me hundreds of dollars!!! Thanks for putting so much time and effort into your reviews, they really help make it very clear that "L" might just stand for "Loser"
@elijahmant2855Күн бұрын
Hey, Matthew. Nicely put together and presented video. Thanks, Man
@raksh94 жыл бұрын
Years ago, I bought a 50/1.2 but it had bad backfocusing problems. The shop went through another three and they all misfocused, so I got a 35L instead. The new EOS R and R5/6 will give those backfocusing EF lenses new life.
@ReggieABrown9 жыл бұрын
You and Christopher Frost make the best lens review videos!
@starbase2189 жыл бұрын
Reggie Brown I actually think Christopher Frost's testing of resolution leaves something to be desired. He takes one frame at a certain focal length and f-stop, and judges both center and corner sharpness from that same image, without refocusing for the corners. So if he tests a lens that has field curvature, that lens may actually be capable of better resolution than his results show.
@laszu71377 жыл бұрын
wrong
@photogenic20104 жыл бұрын
Yep.. most useful, perhaps extending the sigma tests using M43 (gh5) for filming (popular in many countries) both native and ef via adapter. That would be a unique presentation. Thanks for a very comprehensive (and surprising ) result.
@TeamAPS8 жыл бұрын
Excellent comparison! Very informative and well-produced. Earned a subscriber in me! :)
@captainkuijt Жыл бұрын
I was torn between one or the other, but I was sold on the Sigma right when I saw the sharpness results. I don't mind the extra weight so much, I always have battery grip on my 6D to counter it becoming front-heavy with heavier lenses anyway. Cheers mate!
@jameswang16052 жыл бұрын
u just got a new subscriber! best comparison video I have watched
@MatthewGore2 жыл бұрын
Thanks James! It was a fun one to make :-)
@Taimoe9 жыл бұрын
This is the best comparison of two lenses I ever saw...very helpful statistics! Thanks a lot !
@HarvVideoAudioStuff9 жыл бұрын
Really great video, seriously man.. fantastic
@K9malinois_dog_love3 ай бұрын
One is an artistic lens with tons of characters and the other one is sharp lens for landscape you shoot at 5.6-9f
@tinathelenphotography78897 жыл бұрын
thank you for a very informative and precise review of these two lenses!
@RyanHicks4 жыл бұрын
Really phenomenal work on this review. Continue on with this format, please.
@maskirovka778 жыл бұрын
thanks for posting this: I had been mulling buying the Canon 50mm F1.2 for dance photography, but I think I will be taking a serious look at the Sigma 50mm F1.4.
@NakeanWickliff8 жыл бұрын
You do a fantastic job sir! Thank you for sharing! I've been on the hunt for a good 50mm going from Canon's 1.2 to the 1.4 for faster focus, then the Tamron 45mm and I'm getting my 1.8 fixed this week. I think I might have to try out the Sigma. Every photog needs a good, reliable 50!
@NakeanWickliff8 жыл бұрын
Oh and I'm from Seattle as well! www.nakean.com
@marknongkhlaw16749 ай бұрын
Sigma usually have a micro usb port for updating the firmware. Not sure if this has, but that's another thing to keep in mind. As far as APSC goes, it has the "holy trinity" with 16mm, 30mm and 56mm, how would the 30mm compare with the nifty fifty? Thanks for the very scientific and methodical review
@RollingShutter3 жыл бұрын
very well done comparison.. I was already set on the Sigma, but the high weight and large formfactor kinda throw me off.
@ikoknyphausen198 Жыл бұрын
Thank you. Can you throw in a nifty-fifty into your comparison?
@kevleverenz9 жыл бұрын
Respect, this video is all I ever wanted. You keep at it.
@Dngrov2577 жыл бұрын
You are demonstrating relative sharpness across the frame, which you want in most landscapes. However, one would generally not use a 1.2 or 1.4 lens for landscapes at any aperture because such lenses are generally across apertures than say a 50MM f2, which a is better everyday 50MM than a large aperture lens. One buys these lens to shoot wide open with a primary subject in the center third of the frame to get that blurry, dreamy, drawing effect in the out of focus areas. I just find the images from the Sigma to be clinical compared to the Canon. I would say the same about the Zeiss Planar vs the Zeiss Otus, which is similar in design to the Sigma. In the end, I do not mind some vignetting or chromatic aberration to avoid the clinical feel the Sigma imparts to me.
@MatthewGore7 жыл бұрын
I see. It looks like this is something that I'll need to explain in a future video... my fault. There are several reasons that I use landscapes for testing sharpness. First, it's more interesting than using a test chart (and the subject doesn't matter for sharpness as long as there is detail to compare). Second, models move. This makes comparisons impractical for a couple of reasons: first, they can introduce motion blur into the image, and second, if they've moved it makes the images different in composition, and thus harder to compare. Third, many lenses exhibit field curvature to some degree or another, so different parts of the image may be sharper with different lenses, and it's not always obvious to people who are comparing the images whether a particular area is blurry purely because of its resolving power or because of field curvature. Consequently, I shoots test shots that are beyond both lenses "infinity" focus setting, where field curvature is not a significant issue. If I were focusing on a model who is much closer, then I'd also run into the problem of matching focus points. If I were to focus on the near eye of the subject but in one case the focus is perfectly on the eye surface and the other case it's on the eye-lashes (or somewhere in between), and we're talking about the depth of field that you get at f/1.2 or 1.4, then this can cause a significant difference in the appearance of sharpness in the rest of the face, and again, the cause for that may be unclear when simply viewing the images. So, these are a few of the reasons that I shoot landscapes for these tests. Ultimately, some people will prefer some lenses for reasons other than resolution, contrast, distortion, vignetting (etc.) characteristics. I frequently hear people say that one lens or another has a certain ineffable quality to it... a magic or emotion or whatever. Those things, however, are subjective by nature, and I can't reasonably compare them... so I'll compare what I CAN compare. And of course it makes no difference to me which lens people prefer... I'm only here to show you some information about the lenses, I'm not selling them, and I have no stake in the matter. That said, it's much easier to add a bit of barrel distortion and softness into a sharp image than it is to get more resolution out of a soft one.
@Dngrov2577 жыл бұрын
Matthew Gore , perhaps I have been more critical than I intended. For that, I apologize. I realize that you and others that do these lens tests are just trying to help people and there is probably no good way to set up the perfect test. I just get a bit frustrated with the focus on sharpness (not just you as most lens reviewers do so as well. For example, the Canon 24MM-105MM f4 ver 1 has a reputation among lens reviewers as not having the best sharpness. When I take a portrait with it, the person's face is plenty sharp. If it were sharper, you would see every pore and minor blemish on the person's face. I read an interview with a Nikon optical engineer in which he discussed the challenges in optical design and trade-offs that much be considered. To a question about vignetting, he said he could design lenses without vignetting, but there would a trade-off somewhere else, such as color saturation, contrast, price, etc. So, in the end, one's preference will depend on what you value in a photograph. As far as that Sigma is concerned, I would not buy it even if I liked the images it produced. A 50MM lens that is about 5 inches long is just wrong!
@markharris57718 жыл бұрын
Brilliant video with plenty of examples, thank you. Although I don't think you mentioned it I think the Sigma also had better colours. Time and time again 3rd part lenses seem to outdo the Canon version.
@danncorbit362310 ай бұрын
For a super fast prime, nobody wants to shoot at f8. In fact, if you are at f8, chances are you should be using an ND filter. Their core reason to be is for portraits or other similar concepts where you are isolating the subject at all costs. IMO, YMMV. Of course there are exceptions, but at f8 why choose the Canon f1.2 L over the f1.8 STM? There is no logical reason. On the other hand, the reasons for choosing these lenses over much cheaper options are really art reasons. It is incredibly difficult to measure such things. So we focus on the measurables. But ask Julia Trotti why she loves the Canon f1.2. And she's no dummy. And the usage also comes into play for specialty things like astrophotography where the Sigma atomizes the Canon into lens dust. Having barked and complained and whinged like a petulant child, I still enjoyed your review and found it useful.
@falcaomiami4 жыл бұрын
Btw.... because of your review I ended up buy the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 used over the canon and I love it. Thank you!
@lifelimitless17106 жыл бұрын
One of the best video on lens comparison. To the point. Thanks.
@mbvideos44489 жыл бұрын
Found your channel through /r/photography. Fantastic, to the point, lens comparison/review. Thank you.
@stefanoantonucci12453 жыл бұрын
Am I wrong or.. The Canon has slightly more saturated colors? look at the sky in the first picture..
@rombcorp869 жыл бұрын
hi Matt, waiting for rewiev of Tamron 15-30
@madebyitself7 жыл бұрын
this is so cool! thanks, mate! very useful! couldn't understand if I should buy Sigma, but now the decision is made.
@fredsbloggs6568 жыл бұрын
Very competent and complete review, well done!
@MarkNakib9 жыл бұрын
Your stuff is very helpful and I really appreciate it! Keep at it, for all of our sakes!
@MatthewGore9 жыл бұрын
Mark Nakib Thanks Mark! You're one of 8 people who have supported my channel since I've started accepting fan funding. It's an elite group :) And it's already been a big help... I'm working on my next video now. All my gratitude - Matt
@MarkNakib9 жыл бұрын
Well, personally, you've had a hand in 3 lens purchases already for me. You've saved me probably over $1000, so it's the least I can do. I wish I had more than $5 to give but I'll try to keep it coming in the future as long as you keep putting out such quality stuff.
@angelsepulveda69527 жыл бұрын
Thank to your comparizon I will now decided to buy the Sigma lens.
@artiest56 жыл бұрын
You should do more of these. It would be great for us more low budgeters, if you explore some of the Vintage Lens's. I'm really interested in purchasing an Olympus 50mm 1.4 lens but a review like this would help a lot
@MatthewGore6 жыл бұрын
Hi Vincent, I'd love to do more of these... they just take a long time to make, and since I don't really make any money from them, it's hard to justify spending all of the time :-) I am making more, though... just generally have to stick with more popular lenses. I'll see about starting a Patreon page or something, maybe I can expand a bit.
@artiest56 жыл бұрын
Matthew Gore I understand.
@ttt0877 жыл бұрын
The best review of Sigma Art 50 ever .. thank you !
@shovelrocker71025 жыл бұрын
Nice comparison. But i can say about my Sigma 50mm Art that the AF performance while using Canon 5dmk4 is sometimes quite bad, but at f2 you can somewhat overcome the issue. The focus goes from being front to back, even if you happen to have decent amount of light around you, so you pretty much can't adjust it to be accurate. Even though i do like the images you are able to get with the lens, if the plane of focus happens to be where you put it :D
@stevofoo7 жыл бұрын
All of the reviews are super accurate, will done!!!
@soumyapatil21149 жыл бұрын
Brilliant take. All plausible doubts answered. Thank you.
@jbs9917 жыл бұрын
Photographers do not buy a lens with aperture 1.2 to take a remote view, this test is irrelevant and does not emphasize the beauty of a lens shot with a reduction of 1.2. Because a sharp drop on the sides or slightly less sharp on the sides, really irrelevant to a lens that is considered a lens for street photography or portraits, you should do the same test with the photographs for which these lenses are intended
@lorenzomartin62179 жыл бұрын
great information. stuck between these two but i've come closer to a decision thanks to this.
@panyiaxiong828 жыл бұрын
wow!!! very nicely done!!! very informative and helpful!
@patpathinayake35867 жыл бұрын
Hi, Matthew, Brilliant, succinct and clear technical data encompassing unbiased opinions. Thank you so much. As a favour, would you be able to do a Video on a Sigma 150mm-600mm Sports lens to be fine tuned by using a Sigma doc? This process uses Free Sigma firmware and it is tedious and long drawn one. The clips I watched relating to this process, do not cover much and not clear. Many thanks.
@mr.goodtv7 жыл бұрын
got my 50art because of this review. thanks matt :)
@dannyklesh4 жыл бұрын
At the end of the day people shoot fast primes at 50 and 85 for the DOF and blur. The canon is obviously the winner in that aspect hence the winner overall.
@dia-mandt57125 жыл бұрын
I think it depends on what you are going to shoot. For portraits, i would go for the canon. For landscape, the sigma would be the first choice.
@Canoneosmiami8 жыл бұрын
Very informative about the distortion ,very nicely explained !
@SuperRambo19852 жыл бұрын
Still a nice & clear review
@DionSiswadi6 жыл бұрын
Great quality content. Im looking forward you doing comparison between Canon 85mm 1.4L IS and Sigma 85mm Art 1.4.
@EmadAbbas898 жыл бұрын
I'm Iraqi . I wanna say that you're the best in reviewing lenses.. about sigma it's amazing but it is not affordable for most amateurs photographers😳
@hagarthehorrible13918 жыл бұрын
curious as to why you felt the need to state where you're from.
@EmadAbbas898 жыл бұрын
+Pradhyumna Gupta I wanted to tell him that his channel is familiar for people all around the world 🙂..
@thiruu66985 жыл бұрын
Truly appreciate your effort. Thank you. I'm glad to buy a sigma after watching this few days ago
@GodsHermes9 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Matthew! Good job!
@joeblow99318 жыл бұрын
would love to see a comparison done of the art vs voigtlander 58mm nokton
@ralphmendoza8 жыл бұрын
Very in depth, thanks. Glad I stuck with Sigma.
@Hshjshshjsj727273 жыл бұрын
I felt I could expect good things when you even included a sound test :) I am interested in it for portrait photography so I would have liked some more portraits w bokeh Thanks it was helpful overall
@elegeephoto34127 жыл бұрын
I'm in the market for a new lense and this review was really helpful. I appreciate it.
@DigitalSamTV7 жыл бұрын
fantasti comparison. the problem is the sigma is too large to justify carrying around either on the camera or in the bag... its a shame since the quality seems so high.
@midnightbangkok7 жыл бұрын
Hey man, that was a great review and very helpful. Thanks for helping me decide.
@MatthewGore7 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@shang-hsienyang12845 жыл бұрын
I wonder how the Sigma holds up against the R mount version of the 50mm f/1.2
@MatthewGore5 жыл бұрын
From the weight/size of the R-mount, and the new design (not to mention the price), I'd guess that the Canon will be markedly better. Better for bokeh, anyway, and better in overall resolution, but I don't know if anyone really cares about better resolution in this case :-)