Absolutely this. Joe Rogan content has changed so much from what I knew and loved. So grateful for Lex and his coverage science, space, AI and UFO’s.

I prefer Lex too, once Joe sold out it has never been the same

I don't have any issues with the Spotify platform, I prefer it for commutes and it's functionality has always been fine for me. Downloadable episodes so I don't need to waste data, can skip the ads...... I just miss the comments section, and I miss topics like this. We are all awaiting the jre episode on the new disclosures from dod and pentagon

@@stevencoardvenice apparently their numbers exploded so I think they are very happy. But I'm not sure if its only due to Rogan. It could also be because people are spending more time online during the pandemic.

@@stevencoardvenice if the deal didn't make sense to their bottom line, I am not sure they would have done it. Their share price jumped on the news of the deal, and it is still up above that level even after its recent drop in value from its highs. I doubt they would ever release the actual data but they have said that they got more traffic because of JRE than expected. I'm assuming some people are signing up as premium accounts as a result. I'll try and see if I can find anything concrete.

I have 1 pen and I've had it for at least 2 years🤣😜

Ravens can be scary smart

@@benparrish672 Exactly! I've seen them solve some completely new puzzles so quickly!

@@FuriousImp This is an added 60 million years of evolution to modern birds, so I suspect instinctively they're a bit smarter than dinosaurs 250 million years ago

@@jonathanbatista6135 From what I've understood from evolutionary biologists, high intelligence is a luxury. That's why it hasn't happened as frequently.

When you compare them to humans, its completely different. If humans go to another planet and find birds, no one would be as surprised as if they found other creatures similar to humans.

Lex-Highly intelligent Frank-Highly intelligent and lived longer....To your point Louis it did go over Lex head that the answer can't be more precise than the question.

The laughter you hear from lex is him thinking what a bullshit phrase that was said as if it's some universal law. The guy has obviously used the phrase before . You can come up with examples of why that type of thinking is ridiculous. What's 2 + x = 4? Not very precise....answer? 4. Precisely .

@@NoflectioN My assumption for Frank point is the if you give a broad or vague question than it has multiple answer which than can cause confused...But the process the question, and the understanding between both parties of the question being asked gives a prices answer or you could come to a conclusion that you don't have enough information to give an answer either which is an answer in itself.....

@@NoflectioN also your function understand of math or that subject matter alllows you to give that answer...But if your talking if subject you don't understand than you probably want to ask a precise or clear question to have an answer you can understand in your level

@@SkeemingforaBillion It's not a vague question. We *do* have a definition for "life." If memory serves (from high school biology class): - Can reproduce - Can grow - Is aware (can respond to its environment) I forgot a couple, but it's not true that "we don't have a definition of life." The question is as precise as any other.

Lifeforms in the Sun cannot comprehend us because they can't see anything.

a few hundred years ago, his ancestors had big feathers...

James Bond Weapons!

It's 2021 and the government is admitting that UFO's exist. We live in crazy times friend.

@@grindcoreninja6527 Do you think it's a smoke screen to hide new tech military aircraft?

@@humamumtaz2719 i think its unlikely to be a smokescreen to hide new tech. If anything this becoming public could increase other countries researching and spying into this matter.

@@humamumtaz2719 I thought that at first, but no, which makes me even more uncomfortable. If it was our own technology it would be hidden safely away around groom lake, I also can't imagine it's a foreign weapon as we spend more on our military budget than our two "advasries" and allies combined. I'm not saying it's alien's, but holy shit it could be.

Too many people (in my opinion) are approaching the question incorrectly-from a philosophical perspective. There are 10^22 (or 23) stars in the known universe-and there are good reasons to believe the universe is vastly larger than what we can observe. That’s a 1 followed by 22/23 zero’s. They say to themselves there could be millions of civilizations and many billions of exoplanets with primitive life (many will say far less) However, that would still make up an exceedingly small percentage of life harboring solar systems. This conclusion is reached on a bad assumption in my opinion. And that is that life is a result of chance (accident ). I believe life is not a result of chance, but an inevitable consequence of the governing rules/forces of nature. I will provide you with a philosophical argument for why life exists in the vast majority of solar systems. When we observe the known universe we see uniformity; it’s a real lot of the same things. The universe is governed by a specific set of rules/forces, which we can label natural laws. These natural laws govern matter/energy causing it to take on specific forms, e.g. quarks, protons, neutrons, elections, atoms, elements, molecules, amino acids, proteins, moons, planets, stars, galaxies, etc. All of these systems of matter/energy do not emerge by chance (accident). Instead they are an inevitable consequence of the natural laws of the universe at work Let’s take an atom, the building blocks of larger systems including life. The strong force (or strong interaction) takes quarks, which are the smallest forms of matter we have observed and binds them together to form protons and neutrons. On a larger scale it takes these protons and neutrons, binding them to form the nucleus of atoms. The electromagnetic force takes electrons and binds them in orbit around the nucleus and the result is an atom. Two distinct forces are operating here together to produce a highly creative effect, the formation of atoms. Other forces/rules of natural laws then work upon atoms to form larger systems of matter. Why then should we assume that life,-the most sophisticated system of matter-which is actually comprised of these smaller systems of matter I mentioned, a chance event (it happened accidentally). As a matter of abductiive reasoning (inference to the best explanation) the best conclusion considering all of the current data is that life is also an inevitable consequence of the natural laws of the universe. And is part of and not distinct from the uniformly we observe all throughout the universe. As a result, life exists all throughout the universe as does all the other mentioned systems of matter. Science is teaching us that rocky exoplanets around other stars exist in abudance. Mars is believed to have had a thicker atmosphere and rivers of water on its surface. The evidence for my hypothesis is growing over time.

Probably there is no life elsewhere in the universe let alone intelligent life

@James Buck It’s hard for people to come to terms with the fact that there is so much humanity doesn’t know. Heck, just go back 100 years and look at what life looked like compared to life now. Think of the jumps that we will make in the next 100 years. “There is no life elsewhere” In the future this comment will be similar to when people thought the earth was flat and the center of the universe.

@James Buck looking at the problem backwards and assuming the universe wasn’t purposefully designed for life to emerge. For a self replicating unit to emerge from a system of rules depends on how conductive that system of rules is to producing such a unit. I’d argue that the vast majority of rule system configurations will not be very conductive at all to producing a self replicating thing, however with enough time and space a self replicating unit will form somewhere in such a system so long as the odds are not zero. It seems to me that if you are a sentient self replicating thing and 1) you identify only a single origin event behind you 2) the universe around you looks silent/empty 3) you are having trouble fathoming an easy abiogenesis pathway based on the rules of your system, that: You are most likely in a case where what you know as life emerged as part of a very very very low probability event in a very very big amount of space and time and the next place it happened is so far away as to effectively be outside your visible universe. Could be wrong but it’s an intuition.

Where's the proof that there are billions of planets and billions of stars? There is no proof...that's just something that you have been told. To think that we are the most intelligent life would infer that there is other life in the universe. Where's the proof of that? There is no proof. You can come up all the equations you want to...that's not one thread of proof. What makes us so arrogant is the fact that we spend trillions of dollars on Space exploration while ignoring the problems we have on planet Earth. What difference does it make what's out there? How's what's out there affecting anyone's life on Earth? It's simple it's not.

@@kennethcraig8410 lmao

I agree . Also think pressure is a big factor too for humans . I really believe intelligent creatures can exist under the craziest extremes .

Life can exist in the relatively small "habitable zone" portion of the galaxy. If life exist it would be inside the10,000 light year radius from earth. - could intelligent life evolve the same way in earth? - of the 50 billion species that had appeared on earth, only one specie - the homo sapiens rose with consciousness, to build his cities and his technology.

This is human ego, case and point. We always think we are the best and anything else must be like us.

@@lebowskiunderachiever3591 humans have been part of the universe on terms of this planet for only a blink of an eye, maybe there are other human like species out there but in a world where truth is often stranger than fiction I would say expect anything. Imagination and humbleness and forget the usual arrogance of man who seen to believe we are the only intellectual intelligent life in the cosmos.

😂😂😭

It depends. I think, once a advance thought appears, he quickly needs to form the words and colour in writing in order to fully understand the sweeping thought. That's wise thinking if it's the case.

Yes.

@@iced3263 you make a solid point

@@mdarey13 - a solid ball point

William! You should be ashamed of yourself lol! 😂

Damn homie 😂😂😂

That's a good one reminds me of my first one LOL

I’ve just given you a like

@@bl1398 and I disliked

Until we set up the James Webb Space Telescope! :)

@@tinman652 An exoplanet atmosphere does not necessarily prove the existence of life.

Certainly not definitively, but detecting methane and nitrous oxide, or chloromethane gas would be very interesting potential biomarkers.

@@tinman652 I agree. I guess my broader point is that some people see a video and assume it is an alien spacecraft. Some people say that there are billions of planets, so aliens must live on some of them. But that is not really how scientific facts are proven.

@@deanalbertson7203 yeh. As far as we know and can to date assume we are alone in the universe until proven otherwise. It is interesting though that plant life can live inside spacecraft and Tardigrades, the Only Animal That Can Survive in Space.

Which movie was that? MIB?

@@TheJeremyKentBGross Ad Astra

@@iverstim He didn't find any, brother.. that was the entire point of the film

Shabbat shalom and also Israel is forever 💖

Yes and no. You will have a better understanding but also if you truly understand and open your mind then you should let the ego go and realise we really don't know shit

@@sheshd have you watched any of isaacs videos on the fermi paradox?

@@mikeunleashed1 absolutely have. It's exactly as I've said. We don't know shit

@@sheshd then you should realise there is no ego going on here

@@mikeunleashed1 ohhh nah you mistake me. I'm not talking about your comments I'm talking about those who claim such possibilities are fake etc

My guess is as good as any Intel ectual because nobody knows and nobody is ever going to know so stop the guessing

That can be negated with a thicker atmosphere or shell worlds such as europa. Life can also evolve to live in radiated environments.

@@mikeunleashed1 Perhaps evolve to survive, but to begin in that environment? I don't think so. An atmosphere thick enough to protect itself from the solar winds, and charged particles would be so heavy it would be uninhabitable.

Yup. But successful so far

Distance is only relevant if you have a finite life span. If you are immortal then distances and travel time have little influence over you. It's likely any space traveling aliens have solved the aging problem. You would have life like VR for entertainment as you travel or just set yourself to coma with your smart watch and "skip" the travel time altogether. 1000 years at half light speed would feel like a nights rest. We just don't know what could be possible.

For all we know they can take wormholes right into our galaxy