Lindbergh Baby Case Aka The Lindbergh Kidnapping

No video

Lindbergh Baby Case Aka The Lindbergh Kidnapping - Reel 2 (1935)

Рет қаралды 44,904

10 жыл бұрын

Unused / unissued material - no paperwork - dates unclear or unknown. 1935?
New Jersey, United States of America.
Title reads: "Lindbergh Baby Case - Scenes at Hauptmann's Trial at Flemington, N.J."
Mrs Hauptmann on way to court. Colonel Charles Lindbergh goes into court. Bruno (Bernard Richard) Hauptmann into court. Top view of court. CU Clerk of the Court calling all to rise. CU Gavel hitting desk. Shots from court room. Jury led from court.
Title reads: "Further Scenes of Hauptmann's Trial at Flemington Court, NJ"
Court room hearing case about the kidnapping of the Lindbergh baby. Court reporters take notes. CU stenographer's machine. Pressmen at work. Colonel Schwarzkopf of Police. Ann Lindbergh and Colonel Lindbergh. Betty Gow, baby's nurse. Mrs Hauptmann. Bruno Hauptmann. Shots of Jury, named by voiceover. Hauptmann talks to wife. CU Edward J Riley, defence lawyer. CU clothes of Lindy baby. Shots of Hauptmann. Pressmen at work. CU Morse code sender. More pressmen. Adla Rogers St John (sp?) sums up the trial.
Title reads: "Hauptmann Trial - The State's Case."
David T Willins, New Jersey State Attorney. Shot of Hauptmann. CU indictment paper. Aerial shot of Lindbergh home in Hopewell. Shots of Lindbergh baby. Shots of mother and nurse in court. Views of ladder outside house. CU of notes. J Clarke Sellers about the handwriting evidence. Dr Schulhoff, handwriting expert.
Title reads: "That Is The Man."
Hauptmann into court. Judge into court. Jury shots. Witness - Joseph Peron. CU Hauptmann. Another witness. Recreation of part of the evidence. Condon.
Title reads: "Further Scenes of Hauptmann's Trial at Flemington Court, NJ"
Courtroom scenes. Defence lawyer Riley speaks to the camera. Jury shots. Prosecutor Willins speaks to camera. Shots form court. Hauptmann smiles for camera. CU His wife.
Title reads: "Hauptmann Found Guilty - Closing scenes of America's most thrilling trial."
Courtroom scenes. Shots of accused and witnesses. Shots of cross examination of Hauptmann.
(Spellings for search purposes - Lindburg, Lindberg, Lindburgh)
FILM ID:464.12
A VIDEO FROM BRITISH PATHÉ. EXPLORE OUR ONLINE CHANNEL, BRITISH PATHÉ TV. IT'S FULL OF GREAT DOCUMENTARIES, FASCINATING INTERVIEWS, AND CLASSIC MOVIES. www.britishpathe.tv/
FOR LICENSING ENQUIRIES VISIT www.britishpathe.com/
British Pathé also represents the Reuters historical collection, which includes more than 136,000 items from the news agencies Gaumont Graphic (1910-1932), Empire News Bulletin (1926-1930), British Paramount (1931-1957), and Gaumont British (1934-1959), as well as Visnews content from 1957 to the end of 1984. All footage can be viewed on the British Pathé website. www.britishpathe.com/

Пікірлер: 47

@sue4245 3 жыл бұрын

It struck me that the jurors were shown and their names given. These days jurors remain anonymous during trials, and even after the trail is over it is up to the individual whether to go public, or not.

@Melissa0774 3 жыл бұрын

This case and this media coverage is the reason why it became illegal to have cameras in court rooms for such a long time, isn't it? I think they felt like the media coverage gave the prosecutors an unfair advantage, didn't they?

@martineshamzin7535 3 жыл бұрын

Perhaps. It was already not allowed in the court room. In fact a judge said anyone bringing in a camera would go to jail during this trial. .

@Melissa0774 3 жыл бұрын

@@martineshamzin7535 I don't think it was actually an official law yet, until after this case, though. Maybe the judge just decided that he didn't want it for this case, and then they decided to make it an actual law, after the fact, because they realized they needed to.

@vdo3000 3 жыл бұрын

1:16 Colonel Norman Schwarzkopf Sr., the father of Stormin' Norman.

@robertn800 2 жыл бұрын

And Schwarzkopf Sr. had exactly 0 experience in police detective investigation ⭕

@robertn800 2 жыл бұрын

Recent books & information show Hauptmann did not have a fair trial. The new book “Suspect # 1” was actually Lindbergh himself.

@jacquelynjones7345 2 жыл бұрын

I read that book " Suspect No.1" Good book!

@vincentzack Жыл бұрын

I think Hauptmann was the con-man who extorted the reward money from Lindbergh. In another documentary I learned Lindberg followed NAZI ideology and Eugenics. Lindbergh's son had rickets. I think the Lindberg's maid witnessed something in that household. Lindbergh himself is a prime suspect.

@williekellerwhitaker1531 2 жыл бұрын

Blessing

@cadillacbluez 2 жыл бұрын

This is undeniably an inside job, and I am one of those who believe Lindberg was involved. Whoever took the baby was clearly informed of the whereabouts of the family that night. I live just a couple miles from the scene which is to this day very remote not visible from the small country road that passes in front. Lindberg was known to display despicable treatment of his son because of his racist eugenics' beliefs and the little guys imperfect health.

@Drummer81able 2 жыл бұрын

What's the address of the scene?

@rickdack1197 2 жыл бұрын

I was just on the Lindbergh property a few days ago. I wasn't able to go any further because it's a detention Facility. I don't think Lindbergh had anything to do with it. And inside job perhaps. People need to be careful of conspiracy theories. They will never be solved because those who enjoy theories like this will not profit off books, DVDs, public appearances Etc if it is solved. Just like the JFK conspiracies. It's very profitable. Undeniably Hauptmann but had help. Sometimes events simply occur. Not that there's some extravagant plan or conspiracy it just occurs that way.

@cadillacbluez 2 жыл бұрын

I think you need to look a little more closely at the facts if you are truly interested in the story. It's very easy to come to your conclusion because what is out publicly about the story is based on the Adoration of Lindberg himself. There are many stories as I said about Lindbergh abusing his child because the child had rickets as well as Lindbergh being a eugenist devoted to some perfect white race thing. When you put all of that together with the fact that the guy was never at that house with his family on a Tuesday night it was their weekend home that he missed an important speech that night for no apparent reason and since you were on the property you know that nobody just stumbled across that scene. If it was an inside job meaning it was someone other than lindenberg himself that would have been pretty easy to determine because there was only two other people there. I would not accuse a father of murdering their child unless I believe there was a plausible Theory there I am a father myself. The fact that Lindbergh was a racist is disgusting but not material for my thinking on this issue.

@KarmaKamala-2024 Жыл бұрын

@@cadillacbluez Parents may kill their children but they don't dump them like the way the Lindbergh baby was dumped- Former FBI profiler, John Douglas, "The Cases that Haunt Us"

@cadillacbluez Жыл бұрын

@@KarmaKamala-2024 I don't believe he intended to kill the child I think the ladder broke and the child was killed or badly injured at that moment and others disposed of his body. I think Lindbergh's intention was to have the child taken away somehow let enough time pass that people would forget and the child would end up being raised by other people. Again I don't believe the death of a child was part of the plan.

@kevinbergin9971 2 жыл бұрын

Did we actually get to hear what the defense had to say?

@marysolcruzii8414 3 жыл бұрын

Un circo, y ni siquiera, es más verdadero el circo.

@awalkthrustorms 3 жыл бұрын

The music is so dramatic.

@emi6099 3 жыл бұрын

Was it ever proven he killed the baby?

@hellosweetheart3350 3 жыл бұрын

Nope. I believe they just needed a answer to the question so they painted a picture of houghtman

@emmabovary1228 3 жыл бұрын

Yes. The timber used in the ladder matched his attic floor, the money =(1/3) was from the ransom.

@oliviamartini9700 2 жыл бұрын

@@emmabovary1228 the timber only matched if another piece was slotted in. The money belonged to Isidor Fisch, who took off to Europe and died. It took him two years to spend any. Even if he was involved, he wasn't the one who killed the baby, especially when he had a son the same age. He was a thief in Germany, but he wasn't a killer...and clearly three men were involved.

@robertn800 2 жыл бұрын

CL put himself into leading the Investigation and the police were so in awe of him they deferred to CL & so no one investigated CL & one thing I’ve learned from true murder investigation shows is the 1st suspects are family members. 🤔 The prosecution held back exculpatory info from the defense & that info didn’t come out until after the 60s with the Freedom of Information Act. Hauptmann offered to take a lie detector test and truth serum but they wouldn’t let him. The judge was very Pro-Prosecution. Hauptmann was railroaded & from what I’ve read in recent books, “Suspect # 1” (CL) should have been put on trial.

@Dreamtime-Walker 2 жыл бұрын

Smoking in the Courtroom? Cute Baby !👼🏼

@travishaynes1180 11 ай бұрын

They called it "the trial of the century" but , in 1935 , that was a little premature. By the 19990s The O.J. case had overtaken it.

@susanb2015 3 ай бұрын

No way

@TheWoodland12 6 ай бұрын

I feel so bad for this babies mother . She probably know her husband got rid of their son because of his challenges and special needs. When the baby was alive Lindbergh wouldn’t let his wife show affection toward the baby in his presence.

@kathydethman7218 2 жыл бұрын

Lindbergh was a monster. Hauptmann was just a patsy.

@rickdack1197 2 жыл бұрын

Ridiculous

@vincentzack Жыл бұрын

@martineshamzin7535 3 жыл бұрын

The guy was 100% guilty. He had the ransom money. His explanation for why he had it was absurd. He had done similar crimes using a handmade ladder just like here, as he was a carpenter.

@gokaren420 2 жыл бұрын

Innocent man executed. That ladder wasn't useable. He was a carpenter and would have built a real ladder. No muddy shoe prints in nursery. Nobod new where baby room was except family. Ladder would have been deeper in mud if used. Charles missed a speaking engagement and didn't call to say he wasn't coming. Hauptman had witnesses that saw him at the time of alleged kidnapping. ..his wife and another gentleman. He explained how he got the $$$. Charles refused help from experienced FBI and threatened to shoot cops that went over his head. Cremated baby quickly. A racist nazi that believed in eugenics and was ashamed of the disabled boy. No pics of kid after the age of 1. He thought himself better than others and couldn't dare have a mentally and physically challenged kid.

@kevinbergin9971 2 жыл бұрын

Well, the case against him for extortion was incredibly strong. the case for the kidnapping not as much. His story, about someone-with German accent-leaving the money behind didn't help him much.

@sheilasalter9716 8 жыл бұрын

Yes

@greggprice3609 3 жыл бұрын

Poor Hougtman they just needed someone to blame

@paulamadden1766 3 жыл бұрын

More likely, poor baby, parents, Anne, his wife, and his son. He was arrested many times in Germany for burglary and using a gun for robbery. That is why became to USA. He had escaped jail and was on the run. He was a psychopath who ruined many lives including members of his own family. I have some sympathy for his ordeal, and that of his family. .

@notthisguyagain8557 2 жыл бұрын

They could've blamed anyone, but I guess it makes sense to blame the guy who had the money, jafsys address I'm his house, several witnesses identifying him, the ransom money, happened to live in the area close by jfsy, psychopaths do a great job of convincing people they're innocent. Even knocking on deaths door they'll proclaim innocence. Look at every serial killer that was caught, 95 percent will still say they're innocent

@robertn800 2 жыл бұрын

Poor toddler Poor Anne Lindbergh was an awful Nazi sympathizer & Hitler admirer. He was the one who took the child & was responsible for his death- the child had deformities & did not fit his views on Eugenics. The child had just had his hair curls, yet they gave the press photos almost a year old. He called his child “ IT “