Yea, it is funny. You can get some code stubs, but you can do that by googling too. But it is actually funny to ask for uninteresting facts and puns. It obediently produces puns that it has found on the net.

Only for improving the clarity and grammar of my sentences. 🤪

Yes quite a lot

I am deliberately trying not to use it directly. But I think everyone is using it indirectly. Eventually it will be normalised, but maybe some aspects of it will be forbiden?

I've been using it a little, just for curiosity.

That’s just sad. Sorry to hear this

Once they realize AI needs constant data to train they will need you guys back, and fire all the AI developers

And the cycle starts over again

​@@uwu.-.5873 was going to say the same thing. AI is just not the be all end all of programming. These companies jumping on the hype train are going to regret it. Some already are.

i have a dream, that microsoft get what they deserve some day.

Boss comment.

The clue is in the title. Artificial means 'not real' not real intelligence doesn't work...

​@kutto5017 that's not what artificial means

@@monguskooklord7867 Do tell...

His tree bears many fruit 👏

As Stallman would remind you, what you're actually using is correctly called GNU/Linux.

And yet the Linux fanboys are so toxic that decades later you can't give Linux away for free, because it's still deliberately difficult and "support" is basically insulting you for now already knowing, and telling you that it's not Windows. Thanks, but no thanks.

@@jonah1976 exactly, I'm surprised for a somebody who has been using Linux for two decades to say it is all thanks to "just one guy"

Linux OS? ... Just to be clear: Linux is a family of Unix-like distributions and the kernel that these distributions are built on top of. So far we don't even know what distributions you've been using.

Lol. Well, that's the way marketing has been working for decades, if not longer. The only difference is that now it becomes more obvious I guess.

So your system is better then xD

Even static rules may be called intelligence. In the end, they are solving a problem or at least partly.

@@nthwied1164 I understand what u r saying but I am very sure this isn't what's being marketed.

Pretty standard lol. I mean technically I guess you could call linear regression “AI”

But Market share doesn't really say that.

@@FunNFury You're shocked because big companies aren't eager to invest in a system that "does not cater to the average user"?!

​@@FunNFury The Linux market share is number one by far. It runs every Android smartphone on the planet, almost every "smart" electronics (TV sets, smart cameras, smart watch, etc), every server in every cloud on the planet (including Microsoft and Apple's), every network router, every super computer, every electric car entertainment and control system, etc.

@@lolilollolilol7773 Android is again a different ball game, it's not really linux

100%

WIth halucinations and outright wrong answers, how would you know that what you get is even accurate though? This "time saving" that you talk about is the biggest issue because you leave the "fact checking" to someone else, basically. But that also means, it makes it harder to know if what you get is actually a good source.

@@CrniWuk when you have experience you sort of tell when the LLM is accurate or not. i dont deletegate fact checking to the LLM I fact check myself or test the code I write with help of LLM. regarding the sources the gemini app does list the sources it used to generate the answer.

@@DavidCalderonNJ But if you fact check your self, then why do you need LLMs for? And how would you know if they are right or not? Again. If you let the algorithm do the "heavy lifting", how can you be sure that what you get is correct.

​@CrniWuk hallucinating only happens when you ask it something out of blue. For standard questions like, "what function is used in c++ to read a line from input" or "command to redirect stdout to stdin", these work pretty well. You kind of know with experience when to expect hallucinations and when to not.

How to install discord from the command line in arch linux?

One of the most unstable distros.

@@Flavor_Flav If you don't update everyday.

Thanks I didn't know you were using Arch, old man. Neat distro.

​@@rouxgreasus not really, whenever you update, you will still get the latest packages at that moment, many of them with undiscovered bugs. So better update it as often as possible to make full use of the reason you are compromising stability in the first place. Or get nixos if you don't mind the additional difficulty.

Linus would be nowhere if not for Dennis Ritchie.

Interestingly, some of the first tasks we have seen that thing called "AI" to excel at, are those that have been largely considered "emotional, creative and uniquely human", such as poetry and visual art.

@@Juan-qv5nc But THAT'S the point - because AI does not have what we call a SOUL - an expression of The Creator of the Universe!

@@Juan-qv5nc It doesn't, though. "Generative" AI is nothing of the sort. If you examine the data sets on which it's trained and compare that to the output, you'll discover that it's not creating anything. It's making minor edits to poems, songs, paintings, etc., and presenting them to you, while counting on you never to be able to find the reference image or book. It's just a way to digitally whitewash plagiarism.

AI is incredibly creative, that was one of the biggest surprises for me when I first used it.

@@manticore4952 True creativity is essentially a reflection of your EMOTIONAL MINDSET - something that cannot be programmed! 😁

I am the end of Linux.

A glorified macro

Not many people will be replaced by AI in 2024. But what about AI in 2028? Many technologies tend to get better exponentially once the ground has been built but AI could be different

I am a Data scientist and trust me AI will replace you and me 😂

@br0ken_107 😂😂 im a data scientist who isnt afraid of the truth its all bs

Meanwhile, Elon is developing human microchips and brain implants. AI is so safe. Read Revelation 13, which is an accurate 2000 year old warning about AI, in the Bible. It isn't about religion, but about IT controlling all of humanity. Old John on Patmos had more common sense than the average software engineer 2024 years later.

"He doesnt care about AI, like he said" He didn't say that.

It's just obviously a lot of hype. Statistics has been rebranded as AI like "cloud native" instead of server-side

@@adammontgomery7980 "AI" today isn't statistics, and even though it's not "real" AI, just calling it statistics is just as misinformative.

He's right though. AI has been massively overly hyped and expectations have become outlandish. A lot of it being bandied around by people who are clueless.

​@@RazumenIf it's not statistics at the core then what is it in your opinion? It kind of is, isn't it?

"Mixture of experts is what you use when you've run out of ideas" - Geohot (paraphasing)

It's a fundamental limitation of the way it's trained. It requires *massive* sets of data to train on, and it would require exponentially larger sets to achieve marginal improvements. At some point, it's just not possible for it to have enough data in accessible memory to achieve any further improvements, and you can only then make trade-offs.

I have a feeling this comment will be really funny in a year.

@@Cryptic0013 While true....I recommend you look up Nvidia Foundation Agents. Still in the research lab but if Nvidia can be believed, it is "wild" and might get "wilder".

What you're going to see is big improvements with each generation of hardware. Bigger models generally mean better AI. Each new generation of hardware allows bigger models. The new hardware is rolling out Q4 of this year and Q1 of next year.

While it is true that AI systems today are based on statistical computing and pattern recognition, it is important to recognize the advancements and capabilities that these systems have achieved. AI models, particularly those using deep learning, have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in tasks such as image recognition, language translation, and even creative endeavors like generating art and music. These models do not just mimic data; they learn complex representations and relationships within the data, enabling them to make predictions and decisions that can sometimes surpass human performance. Furthermore, the development of AI continues to evolve, with ongoing research focusing on improving their understanding, reducing biases, and enhancing their ability to generalize across different contexts. While AI may not think like humans, its ability to process and analyze vast amounts of information at high speed and accuracy offers substantial benefits in various fields, from healthcare to autonomous driving. Thus, dismissing AI as merely statistical computing overlooks the significant and transformative impact it is already having on society. - AI

Except it costs a billion times more to run and if everyone uses it, a data drought will come where no more info is produced for the machines to learn from causing them to get dumber and dumber. And incentive structures are messed up if you don’t generate clicks and ad revenue because a machine plagiarises and republishes elsewhere.

Well junior devs should know it because the are almost gone 😅

​@@Alex-hu8gjNot really.

Can Google Search get a Silver medal at the International Math Olympiad. Answering in 2 mins, what takes genius-level Math students ~4 hours? Or can Google Search be the best chess player in the history of the world? It's not equivalent.

google got worse cuz of spam, if ppl gonna find a way to reverse engineer AI so what they want popups to AI answers then its gonna happen again and again and again, just like books now a lot are filled with spam, well generated from google search and ai lol

Bingo.

LLMs did, but nothing beyond that

Chatbots that spit out generic things. they still cant go into more details because of privacy. you still end up talk to humans

Some specialized AIs already have made some important contributions: the AIs that help detecting breast cancer on radios are more accurate than human experts. Some AIs have been used to accelerate the search for efficient medecines, or new chemical reactions for better batteries. These are not generative AIs nor LLMs.

Too many didn't, as I did, learned COBOL or CP/M-80. That's before the PC and DOS. My first computer only had two floppy drives, no hdd and a whopping 4k RAM. My second one ran MS-DOS 3.3 and had 1MB RAM. Wow, so advanced ...with 20 MB HDD! Twenty megabytes! Now ordering a laptop with 96GB + 4TB and 12GB GPU. All in one lifetime.

That's why Torvalds cursed them out to one of their reps, and instead of being better, they just gave up on consumer Linux based ARM personal devices. (Nintendo Switch runs a custom Horizon microkernel IIRC)

What? What a dumb interviewer

That is actually a very good question.

Yes, you can use the tool that finds bugs on the tool itself. This is like saying you can't use drills for the process of making drills.

You took the words out of my mouth. The halting problem cannot be solved. That is the difference between a "machine" and human thought - we can easily see when an anagram wont end.

Yeah. That is something they do right now.

@@denjamin2633 what is something they do right now?

Interesting....so how far back did that mindset orginate, in your experience?

“Finally” 😂😂😂

NON GMO. o r g a n i c. Source of 400b parameters.

nah, you´re thinking organic. Gluten free is a fucking boon for us who actually need it. not a fad. i´m in hospital if heavily contaminated.

They should add it to AI also, 0 calories, organic, gluten free, may contain some alcohol

@@katgod I literally saw water advertised as all natural (because it was spring water, not purified water)...

Right before seeing this comment, I got an email from Trello informing me that they had added AI to the system. It's a Kanban board. It's literally just a bunch of digital post-it notes you move around to track tasks, and they're claiming it's somehow "Powered by AI" now.

Yes, but I’m not sure about quantum computing as I don’t see how it is impactful currently

Yes, but Artificial intelligence is still artificial i.e. fake, false, intelligence, more super smart parrot.

Fusion might make it by 2050 if at all.

Sarcasm switch = ON

LMAO

Didn't they also think it would take decades (if not ever) for AI to defeat a human Go player? I think they said there are way more Go board configurations than atoms in the universe. But I think we will still need humans to guide AI coders and come up with the ideas and plans. At least in the near future.

"A more effective web search" does not sound to me like a bubble that will burst.

I think it is more than web search 2.0, it's more like a private tutor or an expert that's just sitting around 24/7 waiting to help you. If you use it as a learning TOOL, I think it can accelerate learning because, let's say you don't quite understand how something is worded in some technical book you're reading, the llm might be able to help you. Like if you're studying programming and you want an example of a function pointer, or a real world idiomatic use of unions, an llm could provide a better and also much faster result than traditional web search.

@@daxramdac7194I use ChatGPT regularly to learn NixOS. I’m quite new to the Linux world and just asking the llm is way more convenient than skimming through the web (or the NixOS documentation😂)

@@daxramdac7194 It is not an expert. If you don't understand something and take the words an LLM spits at face value, you will not only not learn, you will also take on bad habits, echo its falsehoods, and consequently make it harder for yourself to grasp a concept. For anything more complex than the most common questions you could have about programming, an LLM quickly becomes useless, and a hindrance moreso than any kind of help. An LLM cannot understand, it only repeats and transforms. It doesn't learn concepts, it knows what words seem plausible when put together. The biggest mistake everyone is making during this "AI" craze is believing the LLM always generates truths. It does not. If you are using it as a learning tool, how are you supposed to know when it feeds you some fantasy?

@@daxramdac7194 I think the opposite is true. LLMs can be used as a replacement for Google's first page of results. It makes way too many mistakes to treat it as an expert, and if you're using it as a tutor, you're making yourself a disservice. You need to be an expert already to validate if results of LLM query are correct or not.

Literally on the video description!

Not yet.

@@CyberSan7054 The west has fallen. Billions must AI

I got a coin I could sell you 🤣

What do you mean by "just like crypto?" I first bought Bitcoin at $600 and it's currently trading at $66,000 on massive, massive volume. It has a marketcap of $1.3 trillion and millions of investors now hold it as part of their investment portfolios in the form of ETFs. Same for Ethereum. Even frothier projects like Solana have done very well over the years. As for AI, only the people at Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta, etc. know how far the technology will go. Assuming it will continue to improve and preparing accordingly is the optimal game theoretical move here, as opposed to just hoping and praying it fades away.

⁠@@guanxinated what inherent value does bitcoin have? Why does its exchange rate keep fluctuating? What makes it different from a game where the outcome solely depends on your luck (presumably)?

@@turolretar I) I'm not sure anything has 'inherent' value, but for me the value proposition for Bitcoin is as follows: a) It has a mathematically well-defined supply that cannot reasonably be inflated. Gold is like this to a certain extent, but more of it can be mined from less accessible deposits (at the right price), and I feel an abstraction like Bitcoin suits our purposes better in the 21st Century. More specifically, unlike gold, Bitcoin cannot be forged and is easier to transfer. b) It's portable, international, and outside the purvey of an one government. This appeals to me because of my trauma as a Portuguese citizen during the European Debt Crisis of 2010 -2012. I like the freedom of having a store of value - as defined by a) - as opposed to currencies exposed to inflation and political risk. If something akin of Argentina's corralito/corralón had taken place in 2010, my family's savings would have been wiped out. I doubt my parents would still be alive if this had been the case. My paternal grandmother turns 90 years old next week and I very much doubt she would have made it exclusively on her widower's pension. There are other smaller nuances that make Bitcoin attractive, but I think a) and b) more than justify my interest in Bitcoin. II) The exchange rate keeps fluctuating because of supply and demand. Presumably, if it ever reaches gold's marketcap the variance will go down, but even then I'm not sure. (Note that gold was trading at $400 (IIRC) in 2008 and only then jumped up, so even gold isn't 100% stable). III) The outcome doesn't depend entirely on luck: it depends on interest from retail and institutional investors, countries like El Salvador, and a willingness on the part of governments not to ban ownership of the asset (as has happened in China and Russia).

How is it like Crypto? Crypto is just a currency that doesn't have huge potential consequences. AI does.

I would agree that AI is a convenient tool in your kit and has the potential to be a force multiplier correctly applied but it's also true for bad actors, not to forget what is the majority of the market is all VC surfing on hype and corpo BS solving no real problems (not even the ones they made themselves), for the rest of the population is (as always) taking the path of less resistance, making AI no more than a data laundry machine or some easy scheme for crypto snake oil salesman capitalising on FOMO. This generation of AI for now is a bubble full of hot air, maybe once the next AI winter has weeded out all the superficial nonsense it will grow something from the core or (less likely) it will just shrivel and fall into obscurity.

It may become sentient but only at such a scale where it is extremely impractical. Human intelligence is effective combination of many "sub-intelligences", such as spatial reasoning. It comes from visual cortex which is "3D aware". Now imagine the amount of text required to produce such an intelligence. Perhaps you need a couple hundred million descriptions of spatial tasks and their outcomes, and maybe then you get something. Where do you get these texts? It's more practical to try to develop a visual cortex independently and integrate it with higher level thinking.

@@antonlevkovsky1667 i like how you think

@@antonlevkovsky1667 You are missing the point, language describes existence it does not nor will it ever create existence. Because A.I. is limited in communicating and existing using Human words ...

I think if you tell it to forgo it's so called ABDUCTIVE REASONING then one can cut down on the hallucinations. Ask it how it does its "reasoning", including adbuctive, inductive, deductive and you will see that abductive is the one leading to hallucinations.

More like Leenus, I should think.

@@larsnystrom6698 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mZlphLN1uarIiIk.html

Link for the full conversation is in the description

Lol

@@SavvyNik Seriously. Tighten up those stops on any AI related positions.

More like Bogus Science.

AI is not intelligent. Intelligence is an out come of a biological entity.

Well that would require basically having a windows kernel running alongside the linux one, which will never happen. Some level of emulation will always be necessary

Nice.....so it helps you understand the code better?

you joke about that, but people are trying to get VC funding for it.