Save 50% on a Keeper personal or family plan, plus get 30 days free at bit.ly/3OscPl5
@sweatycommenter Жыл бұрын
yo linus why did you make this video isn't this widely known
@kaisersolo76 Жыл бұрын
Just use a Tablet and keep a single display - best of both worlds
@novicracker1980 Жыл бұрын
Linus try this. take your Gaming Monitor to your Gaming GPU, then a second GPU but its a really Low end card like a 4 or 3 gig variety for a second monitor. Then test to see about gaming quality then. I bet this will fix the issue and give GPU makers a new market.
@Flooberjobby Жыл бұрын
Why didn't you add miss matched monitor resolutions? That has a larger impact on FPS.
@ZboeC5 Жыл бұрын
We need more testing. How about using the iGPU for a 2nd monitor? What is the effect on input latency? There is so much more...
@Cy12237 Жыл бұрын
As a multiple monitor guy: I’m just gonna ignore this
@krazhmatik13 Жыл бұрын
Same
@hiddenguy67 Жыл бұрын
to be honest it's fine for you probably because you have a gaming pc
@mrdaxtercrane Жыл бұрын
Yeah I'm just gonna buy a more powerful card, I ain't alt tabbing
@launebaer86 Жыл бұрын
Exactly
@evanstreittmatter7397 Жыл бұрын
Same
@Seed Жыл бұрын
Thank you linus, I will run my other monitors in 240p now :)
@tombi_106 Жыл бұрын
open up a rgb gif on your displays for more performance
@Seed Жыл бұрын
@@tombi_106 Never thought of that, thanks :)
@Sn00ky128 Жыл бұрын
That's what i did for years, since i lose around 20% FPS with 1080p Videos with my crappy Laptop.
@pandaclysm205 Жыл бұрын
You don't have to ignore. You can choose whatever you want. You are just now informed of those decisions. Better than not knowing, yeah?
@DeckDive Жыл бұрын
@@Seedbro are u not a bot i looked u up on social blade and saw u on seytonics vid
@bradradb5076 Жыл бұрын
Ill save you 10 mins, you only really lose 1-2 fps
@axzaust5 ай бұрын
We need more people like you O7
@TheDestroyer7024 ай бұрын
Thank you so much, the grandeur behind a simple question was just way too much
@lohikaarme4 ай бұрын
But spending that 10mins is the point... we all know already it's not meaningful.
@firebirdsreality14123 ай бұрын
Thank you good sir 🫡
@TECKTECHBones2 ай бұрын
Thanks
@SteeleIT Жыл бұрын
This is the stuff I am stoked to see more data of. I have 3 monitors and a few follow-up questions related to this subject. If I have an older high refresh rate monitor with g-sync does that hurt my performance on my primary gaming monitor since the GPU is trying to sync with more than one g-sync module? Would it be best to disable G-sync in the monitor? If I set my IGPU to run other applications like Chromes hardware acceleration, discord, etc. How does that affect things? How about If I have extra monitors set to a higher fresh rate? I have a 60hz tv, a 144hz side monitor, and a 175hz primary monitor for gaming. Is it best practice to set the monitors I am not using for gaming to 60hz? Does it not affect it? How about color depth differences, mixing HDR and non-HDR, 10-bit color, etc? I am very excited for more lab data.
@ph0ax4973 ай бұрын
Its kind off disapointing, but the answer is it all depends on your system health, and CPU you are using. GPU doesnt really care if it is rendering to the 1, 2, 3, or 10 monitors. Most of the work in rendering pixels is done almost instantaneously., G-sync is just a buffer, so it is not so different performance wise than v-sync. You do need to have a good install of drivers though. Every rendering queue, starts with your CPU. CPU sends information needed to your GPU about what is to be rendered, in what resolution, and orders which data goes where. So the answer is, Get yourself better CPU.
@dennisheusschen72733 ай бұрын
@@ph0ax497this video is 9 months old
@JarrodsTech Жыл бұрын
Interestingly, you can actually get an FPS boost with a monitor on a gaming laptop, as most HDMI ports connect directly to the dGPU and bypass the iGPU. Many screens with optimus go iGPU > dGPU, so the integrated graphics act as a bottleneck. This is less important these days with the MUX switch becomming more common, but it's still a nice trick.
@prysma2057 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely true, but only usually apply to laptops without a MUX switch for the GPUs which aren't that much of them nowadays
@_minzez_2926 Жыл бұрын
On a side note to the MUX switch, on fallout 3. On some laptops (specifically AMD) it does not switch from iGPU > dGPU on the built in screen automatically, like with most games. You must manually switch to a higher power mode through AMD Software Adrenalin Edition otherwise the game wont start. Not really sure why but, Bethesda breaking games before you can even play them is impressive tbh. I'm sure there's more games that do this, but I don't know of them. edit: I know why it won't start (not enough power on iGPU), it's the GPU not switching I don't know.
@Mythicalgoon Жыл бұрын
@@PeterKane379hdmi port goes directly into laptop big graphics card. Gaming laptops generally have two graphics cards, for ease of explanation a "small graphics card" and a "big graphics card" the bigger one being the faster one. Normally laptops use a small graphics card to send the signal to the big graphics card which adds "latency" reducing performance. Plugging the hdmi into the laptop thus directly into the big graphics bypasses this issue (as long as you turn off the laptop display as per the reasons listed above). Hope this helps you understand!
@nexuhs. Жыл бұрын
You can always disable the laptop monitor and get the igpu benefits without losing the 2 fps from having a second one
@TheDemocrab Жыл бұрын
@@_minzez_2926 I bet if you try other older games that won't place a huge load on the GPU that this will still happen at least from time-to-time, it's probably related to the game being so light relative to modern hardware that the driver doesn't realise it's a game. Also, any modern iGPU should play Fallout 3 just fine given I was able to keep playing an FO:NV playthrough when my GTX 275 died back in the day and I had to temporarily use an HD4200 iGPU.
@daponagegoogenburg807 Жыл бұрын
I actually thought a second monitor would have a far larger impact on your in game performance, it’s really nice to know in most cases it’s fairly negligible.
@antikommunistischaktion Жыл бұрын
Just have a secondary laptop next to your monitor, or two laptops.
@lupolinar Жыл бұрын
Depends on the PC. If I play Factorio on my NUC and I just open a browser on my 2nd monitor the frames drop from 60 to 45 and lower.
@smokyz_ Жыл бұрын
@@antikommunistischaktion Monitor would be cheaper or better quality for the price of the laptop. If you'd buy 2 worst laptops just cause of small price, their screens gonna be much worse if you just spent the same amount on monitors itselves.
@atryhardguy Жыл бұрын
@@smokyz_ yeah you're absolutely right, but I think that guy did not care for facts. he just said something extra just because he is an internet guy who will comment whatever he thinks will make him sound cool
@reaganharder1480 Жыл бұрын
I also am a two monitor guy and a pretty casual gamer. Half my games I play i've locked the framerate at 60 and with my current build and those games it never dips below that. But having that extra screen for things outside of gaming is huge for me. The option to have a chat open on one screen while watching hockey on the other, as one example. Also, i do some music production as a hobby and having a second screen for that... I couldn't go back. My first two screen experience was just connecting a monitor to a laptop and since then I've refused to daily a single monitor.
@ImOnMy116 Жыл бұрын
the twitch / kick joke at around 6:50 absolutely destroyed me, soo funny
@wojciechszeler25 ай бұрын
nice!
@Success3012A5 ай бұрын
nice!
@TheNotoriousG2 ай бұрын
didnt laugh
@punky27 Жыл бұрын
Most people nowdays use 2 monitors, the second monitor beeing a cheap 60hz. Running 2 monitors at different refresh rates creates major stutters and jerky motion when both monitors are simultaneously displaying motion. Now I heard an windows update partially fixed the problem. You can make a video about this issue will be very interesting seeing the results
@TheWipal Жыл бұрын
all 3 of my monitors have different refresh rates, ahhh
@seegee97 ай бұрын
I would think having the second monitor running off the igpu would fix this
@KremsonKhan7 ай бұрын
120hz main & some un-branded cheap 60hz second monitor and yep everything(games browser) lags/stutters on main monitor!
@IamWeezyHD5 ай бұрын
I have a 4070gpu and can't game and watch one youtube video or it lags
@fallenchief5 ай бұрын
@@IamWeezyHD make sure any game modes/optimizers within windows are turned off
@dazkid33 Жыл бұрын
It's worth mentioning that having a multi-monitor set-up doesn't REQUIRE you to use all of your available monitors in tandem. Sometimes you can just turn on only your main monitor and chill that way.
@KroLeXz Жыл бұрын
Having it plugged in does add input latency. Wish they had done test to explain why
@sukitoru- Жыл бұрын
@@KroLeXzso if having multiple monitors even if you’re only using the main once the other monitors are technically on too which means it will use some resources and add latency. Is there a way to like fix this would having to unplug unused monitors all the time?
@kylianthehylian Жыл бұрын
@@sukitoru- hook up your secondaries to their own power bar and just flick the switch when you don't want them using resources
@palmtree5489 Жыл бұрын
@@KroLeXz its probably so minimal that you dont even recognize it in 99% of games.
@martindag1413 Жыл бұрын
You can have a multi-monitor setup but you don't have to use them both all the time - is that really worth mentioning, or is it totally obvious?
@kagex5426 Жыл бұрын
I believe it would be interesting to see how much difference using iGPU or a second GPU for secondary monitors would make.
@diedrichg Жыл бұрын
Wanted to make the same comment. What about the iGPU for monitor 2 with monitor 1 on the GPU?
@jalkarna Жыл бұрын
Yeah using processors with integrated graphics for such things is what I do, i have 3 monitors and yes it didn’t make difference in performance
@Bert4ceasar Жыл бұрын
A lot, I'm using secondary GPU's or IGP's all the time for second and third monitors. On my main it would take +10 C in heat and a performance hit.
@arcciel9776 Жыл бұрын
I as well would like to see if a additional graphics cards help with multimonitor setups. In an streamer scenario it would be interesting to know if a dedicated gpu for streaming, another for gaming and another for monitors could increace the performance, or ven just one for gaming and a second for stream + monitors
@gavinlarson4520 Жыл бұрын
@@diedrichgI was using one monitor plugged into my motherboard using the integrated GPU and one plugged into my dedicated GPU for a while and I noticed watching videos on the second monitor caused lots of stuttering and it fixed when I plugged it into my dedicated GPU
@SethanderWald Жыл бұрын
1:20 Lol, I was literally just watching Viva la Dirt Leage right before this. 😂
@LazerAimFireАй бұрын
honestly, I feel like two monitors is necessary nowadays, especially when games don’t let you dashboard to go into like discord or something without breaking the game to a point where you need to restart it
@zironemegeaz Жыл бұрын
Would like to see a deeper dive into this kind of testing. HDMI vs DP, 60 fps refresh vs a higher one etc
@willy92wins Жыл бұрын
Yes, also they didnt specify if harware acceleration was on/off (i suppose on) and if turning off helps or not
@TwiztedMannix87 Жыл бұрын
I've tested 2 multiple monitors, and I highly recommend one monitor when gaming. The less stuff ON the better, especially with older gfx cards. Steam overlay cost me performance also, super noticeable on older gfx card. If you want dual monitors, keep it on slim usage on 2nd monitor like a website/tab/app but it will hurt the fps maybe under 10% ??? That's just my experience 😊
@WayneMcCormick Жыл бұрын
In a deeper dive, what about monitors that are different resolution and/or refresh rates? I’m sure most people use identical monitors for their 2nd, 3rd, and 4th?
@TwiztedMannix87 Жыл бұрын
@WayneMcCormick they should do more monitor testing, I'm interested to see the legit results. I recommend identical set up as much as possible.
@Rocky712_ Жыл бұрын
@@TwiztedMannix87Watch the stuff at 5:20 and you might realize it doesnt matter if you don't do anything on the 2nd screen. Also, you must have a really old card, like 7XX or prior from Nvidia or an AMD equivalent to have such performance issues.
@djtlh7335 Жыл бұрын
im suprised you guys didnt test to see how much the input lag gets worsened for each monitor getting added, and to see if plugging the main monitor into the gpu for gaming and all the secondary and so on monitors into the integrated gpu for non gaming tasks will help with the peformance. i hope you guys will make another video addressing these issues.
@carlosgarcia1165 Жыл бұрын
they made a very easy video to earn some cash, nothing serious..
@HerbaMachina Жыл бұрын
@@carlosgarcia1165nope just a limited scope. They were trying to answer a specific question. There's no reason they couldn't do a follow up looking at latency. However I doubt it will add much to the story.
@ShadowWolf936 Жыл бұрын
@@HerbaMachinaagreed, I mean this is computers we're talking about can't get into everything. Half the time I get a game that won't start all because I have my controller plugged in before I start it
@CarlosManuelGv Жыл бұрын
@@HerbaMachina this topic is too broad to talk just about some simple stuff. I think they are creating more desinformation than actually helping
@oso1165 Жыл бұрын
It should work if you have an iGPU built into your cpu. Plugging extra monitor into that should negate the performance hit. But I agree they should have shown this
@lochsloy217 Жыл бұрын
Everyone should Unsubscribe from this channel until they release an apology video about gamers nexus and hardware unboxed. I just unsubscribed and you should do they same if you value honestly in your product reviews. Quit rushing your content willingly making errors and still releasing it to the public. Very disingenuous numbers and takes in LTT videos we the content consumers must hold them accountable.
@PatSmashYT7 ай бұрын
If your computer is having performance issues from having 2 monitors, I'm pretty sure your computer has much bigger issues
@jetjitten6632 Жыл бұрын
The high end system was used and while the results were surprising to see how minimal this impacts the performance I would also how loved to see how the effects are with the mid and low end system. But those who buy low or mid range pc might not be using multiple 4k monitors since 4k monitors do cost a lot and depending on the GPU they might have to opt for display through igpu and not through the GPU. This could have been a longer video with more variation in setup as this is a interesting topic to know about more.
@vadnegru Жыл бұрын
I hope they are just testing the waters
@mikkelens Жыл бұрын
Yeah I wish they covered scenarios more people actually use, eg. secondary 1080p monitor on their low/mid end PC, using Wallpaper Engine etc.
@theyruinedyoutubeagain Жыл бұрын
Yeah, testing solely on a high-end system was truly a donkey-brained decision. Not only it addresses the smallest portion of LTT's audience, but it's the kind of system where the additional GPU load matters the least.
@brianm.595 Жыл бұрын
Its one of those things that they could probably do an 8 hour video with all the variables. I dont know about low end parts. Its not really worth testing because you can probably work out the pattern from mid and high. like an igpu or video card with less than 8gb of vram isn't really worth testing. You got 1080p and adding in more 1080p monitors to your already stressed system is going to be slightly worse.
@SpartanArmy117 Жыл бұрын
This would've made more sense but at the same time this is exactly what I was worried about for them with LTT labs. This might be the most useless video I've ever sat through and I'm not joking. You're telling me the computer playing back 3 videos hits my performance slightly! Thank god I had hard data to back up the obvious lol. Also the "twist" of a monitor not doing anything not impacting performance is just very odd. Duh guys, you're not drawing anything new.
@milan0abc Жыл бұрын
Would've been nice to also include the test on lower end hardware, maybe something like a 2060 to see what the difference would be there
@PinHeadSupliciumwtf Жыл бұрын
Yeah curious about VRAM limited cards.
@photlam9769 Жыл бұрын
I had 2 monitors on a 2060, wasnt a terrible hit at all but still preformed better on my new 6700xt
@milosmarkovic2204 Жыл бұрын
Indeed. Also curious about games where the CPU is the bottleneck. For example on an i3 where there are no extra cores for background tasks
@photonboy999 Жыл бұрын
@@PinHeadSupliciumwtf I doubt VRAM will be much of an issue unless you're really close to maxing out the VRAM. You probably only add a couple hundred MB's at most if you have two extra monitors open for really basic web tasks or whatever. So on an 8GB card that would be maybe 3% of the VRAM?
@airy6867 Жыл бұрын
I can assure the performance of games can be really, really strong... As my poor old PC is running on GT 640 3GB and 8GB DDR3 RAM, with i5-3350P I sometimes have troubles viewing a video on FHD (even tho my monitors are both 60Hz 1366x768, but the video is way smoother) and playing something demanding for my PC, like Genshin Impact or GTA V... But I second this idea, would love to see benchmark results there
@darkclasher9949 Жыл бұрын
What would be cool is seeing this effect on laptops as many of may use gaming laptops to work or complete our school/college qssignments and then come home and plug monitor(s) in to play using additional accessories. I also think that this will vary a lot based on the gpu for lets say a 3060 or a 4060 or whatever other gpus are currently in use by the gaming community
@yuxuanhuang3523 Жыл бұрын
I am wondering if my dedicated graphics card in a laptop directly displaying the game on my main display while the integrated graphics running voice chat interfaces will hurt my performance. ( not taking account of the CPU hit since I would could also run voice in background)
@HowToArter9 ай бұрын
Actually plugging your laptop in an external monitor in 90% of cases will boost your performance (if you have a dedicated gpu, that is). That's because you internal display routes the dedicated graphics card trough the integrated one when you need more performance (say gaming). By doing this your laptop saves power as it uses the IGPU when light tasks are being done and switches to the Dgpu only when needed. However this rerouting (known as Nvidia Optimus) causes latency and performance loss. The Dedicated GPU however in most cases is directly connected to your HDMI/DP so connecting an external monitor would actually increase performance and reduce latency. This is for Laptops with Dgpus ONLY and not in all cases.
@kaishajacobye9 ай бұрын
@@HowToArter This was the case on laptops before 2021. Now they come with MUX switches so you don't need another monitor to gain extra performance, as mux switch can just disable the igpu.
@Alias_Anybody7 ай бұрын
@@kaishajacobye Question is if this applies to all laptops with a dGPU or just the GAMING laptops.
@kaishajacobye7 ай бұрын
@@Alias_AnybodyMainly gaming laptops, but some work laptops can have a mux switch. though theres no point because they are mostly spent moving to place to place, so having optimus is necessary to keep their battery life if they do have a dGPU.
@MrCalie8 ай бұрын
I don't watch this video willing to remove my other monitor I am just watching to see how bad my performance is effected.
@darthbonobo Жыл бұрын
Having the extra real estate is worth more to me than a couple of FPS. BTW - I love that you had VLDL on the lab's monitors
@Pro_Triforcer Жыл бұрын
Give me the gold or i'll mug ya!
@davilinkicefire Жыл бұрын
@@Pro_Triforcer - What are we ? - We are Mugger. - What does mugger do ? They muggle people - (both) SO ...... LET'S .... MUG HIM !!
@LyokoisGreat2 Жыл бұрын
Nice little touch adding the video title above one of the monitors too
@rebuiltHK47 Жыл бұрын
Hey. There's a gamer over there. He's probably got a lot of FPS on him. Let's mug 'em and take all his FPS!
@JW-452 Жыл бұрын
@@LyokoisGreat2 lol, i had not seen that, thats even better
@Seikushim0 Жыл бұрын
Would be cool to test response time with different monitors connected (diff. refresh rate and resolutions) to see if having something like main 165hz 1440p with a 2nd 60hz 1080p would alter performance or response time.
@robpet198 Жыл бұрын
This is exactly what we needed the most! Even though the average frames were only slightly affected, the overall render spikes and response times do feel different with different monitor configurations. Would LOVE to see a follow up video :)
@Joehirst Жыл бұрын
I got you. I run a 165hz 4K panel for my main display, and a portrait oriented 1080p at 144 next to it for reference and multitasking windows... Response rate (though not scientifically measured to the capabilities of LMG) is not noticable.
@Skyhausmann Жыл бұрын
Or the effect of adding a low tier secondary graphics card. Like pairing a 3080 with a 3050 to run the extra monitor(s).
@robpet198 Жыл бұрын
@@SkyhausmannYES YES YES!
@LoggerLuke383 Жыл бұрын
i have this setup! and i can tell you atleast on my setup playing a game i lose like 40% of my fps if the 1080p monitor is playing any video at a different refresh rate. edit: i also did try a 1440p and 1080p at the same rates, and that doesn't make a noticeable difference in fps, for me at least its the difference in refresh rate that screws me over by like 40%'ish
@tito_me_doe6766 ай бұрын
One thing you didn’t mention is multi device setups. I have 3 laptops, none of which is particularly powerful, but a combination of software like Synergy, networking, and a video capture device make them feel like one quite capable multi-tasking monster. And also it’s cool that I have Linux, Windows, and MacOS all working together and each typically does what it’s best at. The MacBook Air records, streams, and edits, the HP has midrange AMD graphics and a ton of RAM, and the touchscreen goes between being a streamdeck-like launcher and a dedicated SSH terminal. Plus it also runs servers on the local network. Maybe it’s niche, but it seems like people should know it is completely viable to have a streaming / recording setup where one machine is the multi tasker running most of the monitors and handling the stream, while another machine just handles gaming. This is even nice that you can have a separate keyboard and mouse for say like chat without leaving the game and potentially bugging out the cursor
@donatedflea6 ай бұрын
theres a lot he didnt mention what is your point.
@dustraider2940 Жыл бұрын
You didn't mention the additional VRAM usage that comes from additional monitors. Even if you're not running anything on the other monitors and they are just chilling on the desktop, their additional VRAM usage can be significant if you're trying to play one of the newer VRAM hungry games on an 8GB GPU. This is the main reason I started turning off my 2nd monitor while playing heavy games and not the FPS loss.
@kathleendelcourt8136 Жыл бұрын
It might also eat up a bit more PCIe bandwidth. If you're decoding or encoding video that data must be streamed through the PCIe bus to the GPU.
@Nordland_74 Жыл бұрын
I got a 3060TI. In the game Diablo 4, 8 GB of VRAM is not quite enough and becomes borderline insufficient for running ultra textures, unless I remove the second monitor. Less stuttering with only 1 monitor.
@ngocquangnguyen736 Жыл бұрын
@anunoriginaljoke5870 it will matter in the details and also the FPS of the game. I using 3070 and it's sometime exceed my 8GB ram in the last of us, when it happend the game look terrible and fps start stuttering
@ngocquangnguyen736 Жыл бұрын
@anunoriginaljoke5870 i'm not the author of the main comment. I just want to answer your question. It will depend on the game you play. Some affect some not
@AT-yu2op8 ай бұрын
Laughs in 3090
@DatBisa Жыл бұрын
I would've loved to see an exploration on how this impacts lower end systems. A few years ago I used to run triple monitors off an RX 480 4GB and the performance increase I got from removing one of my monitors was SIGNIFICANT. I don't remember any exact numbers but there was a big jump in less demanding games like Minecraft, allowing me to finally use shaders, and heavier games went from noticeably stuttery to very smooth, sometimes even almost doubling FPS, like it did in R6 Siege, where I went from low 30s to high 40s and even 50s.
@Charlymander Жыл бұрын
VRAM usage is the most affected when you run multiple monitors.
@juniorcalisthenics8474 Жыл бұрын
Yeah I used to have to constantly unplug my 2nd and 3rd monitor to consistently hit my 144FPS. I got like a 40FPS difference I think (from memory, might be wrong).
@eneg_ Жыл бұрын
You could hit win + O (or was it P?) and switch to single display mode to avoid physically unplugging them.
@guhbe385 Жыл бұрын
Same I had worse specs and honestly I'd get less frames with discord up let alone the extra monitors. I had to turn everything off often on harder games
@snailswrath Жыл бұрын
My thought exactly.
@arithex Жыл бұрын
Viva La Dirt League! Nice.. Thanks for finally covering this topic -- I once asked some former engineers who worked on DirectX at MS, and they didn't seem to have a high-confidence explanation of how things like v-sync and g-sync work, with multi-mon (and potentially with monitors fused together at the driver level, via Eyefinity/Surround). And how it intersects with things like the Win10 "FSO" (fullscreen-optimizations). There's a lot of confusion, and it's very hard to measure display latency, with any certainty or precision.
@dahahaka Жыл бұрын
Which is why I would have expected LTT to so exactly that research in this video...
@Peregrine101 Жыл бұрын
The whole point is that Microsoft shouldn't be aware of those issues. Although optimizations on the OS-level got to be a point, the basics are that the OS is not responsible for that kind of technique. The drivers are not Microsofts business. The OS delivers an anchor point with Direct X or straight into the OS, and getting a particular proprietary technique to work is on the origin company.
@joostrove44409 ай бұрын
If you feel you need the extra performance in certain games or whatever else just temporarily turn off the second monitor and turn it on when you need it again.
@MarcusTL12 Жыл бұрын
I would really like to see them test this, but have the side monitor plugged into another (presumably older and less powerful) gpu. Thats how I run my setup and I feel that it works quite well.
@Dreska_7 ай бұрын
it would be an interesting test but may I ask why you use that setup? Is your gaming GPU not very powerful so you're trying to give it every advantage possible? I wonder if there are driver overheads etc that hurt performance having multiple GPUs
@SavergnАй бұрын
Feel like it would be more realistic to do the testing using the iGPU since many newer CPUs are including them and many aren't utilizing them.
@chaos.corner Жыл бұрын
The thing is, if you have a second monitor, you don't have to use it all the time. It's just amazingly useful when you do need it.
@keyonlewis7574 Жыл бұрын
i have 3 monitor when i working. but when i playing game i turn off the other 2 and keep one on. have to keep all that FPS
@JamieReynolds89 Жыл бұрын
must be sooooo useful to be able to have discord open or youtube on anothe rmonitor.... not. 90%+ of people dont need these extra monitors and do it cos everybody else does it.
@planefan082 Жыл бұрын
@@JamieReynolds89As a laptop user: When you're doing nearly anything productive, they're really useful
@blarghblargh Жыл бұрын
@@JamieReynolds89 guessing you've never held a 40hr/week office job. come back when you grow up, kid
@Neatherback Жыл бұрын
As a gamer, I despair at knowing I'm sacrificing performance. But as a person that watches LTT on my second monitor, AIN'T NO WAY I'M GIVING THAT UP!
@KutsugeMindUrmoks Жыл бұрын
Yes. 2 I have used 2 monitors for the last 3 years, and just the possibility of having messages/youtube on my other screen while im playing something is so useful
@madmike159 Жыл бұрын
You need a 3rd monitor with LTT store open
@SaberWLF15 Жыл бұрын
😂I actually noticed the performance drop cos I'm using a laptop that had a 144HZ refresh rate and my external monitor is only 60HZ
@PirateOfTheWastes Жыл бұрын
Do you guys not have phones?
@Ornateluna Жыл бұрын
The performance drop just isn't large enough to outweigh the convenience of having a 2nd monitor
@mattloveless3542 Жыл бұрын
I wouldnt put too much stock in most anything these guys say. They routinely make errors while testing and seem to be more concerned with selling 75 dollar plastic screwdrivers than actually being a consumer advocate.
@troik Жыл бұрын
just watched this with recent events of accuracy issues fresh in my mind and I found the "Why" section very much lacking.The Labs data is nice, but was unfocussed. We already know that a powerful PC can take the hit of a few FPS and nobody cares, but what Labs should have been looking at here is if the Game is running CPU bound, or GPU bound and draw conclusions based on that. And most troubling for me, you didn't mention or look at VRAM usage at all. If you look at recent titles like Diablo4 or others, that can fully saturate your VRAM after extended play, this will impact your performance VERY significantly. You should have looked at how a 4k Wallpaper has to be stored in Video Memory uncompressed, easily adding up to 200MB to the memory, which is almost a Gigabyte in your 4 screen scenario. In conclusion, I would love if you could spend a bit more time on this in a future video and test with and without 4k/8k wallpapers and have an eye on the Vram in general. I personally do a lot on my machine, not just gaming and I regularly see my 16GB VRAM fully used and yes, I have 3 4k displays that are busy with chats and stats and websites that aren't static. That will impact systems with only 1 monitor as well of course, but that is actually testable by Labs. Thank you for trying to be better.
@mrdzin1209 Жыл бұрын
1:21 HOLY CRAP THAT'S VIVA LA DIRT LEAGUE ON THE TEST SCREENS (Epic NPC Man series) 😂 I'm so frickin happy 🤣
@MysticMylesZ Жыл бұрын
Same
@montecorbit8280 Жыл бұрын
At 1:55 You have Viva La Dirt League up on three monitors!! Nice!!
@kmoecub Жыл бұрын
I can't imagine how any future reviews of Noctua products can be trusted coming from a business that has partnered with Noctua to sell a cross-branded product. "Trust me bro." just ain't gonna cut it.
@dight_ Жыл бұрын
another thing about multi monitor setups (on windows) is that borderless full screen applications can have frametime issues due to the dwm only having one compositor for all monitors. before i think w10 version 2004, it used to be even worse. if there was ANY activity on your secondary monitors, the frame rate of your differing refresh rate monitors would suffer. these issues i brought up happen only if the refresh rates of your monitors aren't exactly the same as far as i can tell.
@mrcomment6035 Жыл бұрын
This was quite unexpected, I never thought some games might affect the multi-monitor setup that much. I would also love to see this experiment on Linux with a few more variations (e.g. Proton and native titles, Wayland/Xorg etc.) Keep up great quality!
@denis2381 Жыл бұрын
I had a similar Problem. 240hz wqhd Main Monitor and one 60hz 1980x1200p Monitor with vega 64. When I use both in same time I can't utilize 240hz mode. It just doesn't work. Look into it. I always thought it hast to do something with the 60hz Monitor because it has only vga and dvi (I use dvi hdmi adapter) Edit: I forgot to mention, that the 240hz Monitor is only possible to run 144hz wqhd when both Monitor connected
@ShimmerismYT Жыл бұрын
@@denis2381 the refresh rate being locked to 144hz is a limitation of xorg I think
@concernednewfie Жыл бұрын
My main is at 144hz. But when I start games, the TV video, aka 4k KZfaq streaming does stutter for a few seconds.
@denis2381 Жыл бұрын
@@ShimmerismYT what is that
@ailuros_ Жыл бұрын
up
@dixie1993 Жыл бұрын
Out of curiosity, how does the performance change if the secondary monitors are connected to the IGPU (integrated graphics) of the CPU?
@tyranus1111 Жыл бұрын
Or any second gpu for that matter.
@Sn00ky128 Жыл бұрын
It's not the same, but if Taskmanager is correct then Videos on my second Monitor are Played through the iGPU during gaming on my dedicated GPU but i still lose quite a lot of Performance with 1080p Videos on my Laptop, which is unfortunate
@JoaoBarbosa1996 Жыл бұрын
I'd really love to know!
@thorcall Жыл бұрын
I actually was wondering that lately. Benchmark where basicly the same with igpu enabled or disabled so I tought, why not put the secondary monitor and decode video on the igpu? Howether I quickly ran into issue, firstly I couldn't get the igpu to do 100% of the work (the impact of a 1080p video on the second monitor was at best halved, there was always a few % of gpu usage no mater what). And more importantly, while running benchmark I noticed that my cpu performanced plumetted by 15-20% in short test (ryzen 5600g). After more test, I noticed that the power usage of the cpu was lower when the igpu was doing something, at least at the beggining of the benchmark, slowly ramping to the normal usage after ~20s. I'm not sure how that would work in real world effect, but short spike of cpu usage are pretty frequent, i'm not taking that risk, so I disabled my igpu. Not sure how a different cpu would act.
@tonyjohansson8395 Жыл бұрын
As default in windows it will use your dedicated graphics for graphics acceleration/encode/decode. Doesnt matter which physical connection the monitor is connected to. What you can do is go to Windows Settings -> Display -> Graphics. You can then set which graphics card you want a certain application to use. This will impact gain back a small amount of performance if you like to game on one monitor and watch video on the second.
@Dawid_The_Man3 күн бұрын
0:27 NOT HIM PLUGGING IT INTO THE MOBO😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
@bakaata Жыл бұрын
Data is incomplete and inaccurate monkey testing
@vintagemotorsalways1676 Жыл бұрын
I feel like its important to clarify that it's not because you have more monitors plugged in but what you are doing on those monitors - having a windowed game along with a video playing on a single ultrawide will have the same effect. If your GPU is slow/old enough you will notice a performance impact just from having multiple monitors attached due to limited bandwidth. When I want to be immersed in a game I just turn my 3 side monitors off.
@on99kfc Жыл бұрын
I thought those 3 videos were always playing/running in the all the test? even 1 monitor test also have 3 video running in the background?
@timwood70 Жыл бұрын
glad some one said this, this just seems like a case of if you do more with your computer its more performance hit on it and not actaully anything to do with the number of screens!
@vintagemotorsalways1676 Жыл бұрын
@@on99kfc Even if they were, when the window is not visible modern browsers and up to date video drivers generally stop rendering the video portion and only play the audio, you can test this yourself by opening a performance monitoring program and playing back a video then completely blocking the video with a static application like notepad. When using a slow enough system I have personally witnessed the video player canvas being blank when it has been covered for a while and then it shows again after a couple of seconds.
@on99kfc Жыл бұрын
@@vintagemotorsalways1676 Windows will continue render the video in the background. Just play a KZfaq video and open task manager to see the GPU video decoding utilization. I tested this with 1 to 3 video playing, video decoding utilization go up to 10%, opened discord and full screen the discord windows, GPU utilization didn't go down at all. The video is being play regardless of it being view or not because the audio is playing. The decoding of the video is handle by the GPU, so even playing the video on the background with sound only, the video is still being decoded by the GPU.
@vintagemotorsalways1676 Жыл бұрын
@@on99kfc I did - that's why I said it. It is also dependent on your browser and what enhancements you have installed/ enabled. I believe you but it doesn't make my experience incorrect.
@Just_a_commenter Жыл бұрын
Even if I lost upwards of 5% of my game's performance, there's no way I'm giving up my triple monitor setup. I'll sooner add a fourth screen, a big 4K TV for media viewing, than I will discard a single monitor! >:U But, it's fun to know what the difference may be anyways, inconsequential as it may be.
@leonidas14775 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, suggesting people "give up" their monitor setup is completely senseless. Just turn them off when not in use.
@Just_a_commenter Жыл бұрын
@@leonidas14775Yep. I can turn off a monitor if need be and I've got GPU horsepower to spare. Multi-monitor setups is the way
@carlosgarcia1165 Жыл бұрын
i have 9, search for PCI ADT-LINK to M.2, I have two of those with AMD cards and 8 monitors that way, it takes the load off the CPU thanks to the two and cards and the chipset. I am using and cards because it is very hard to have mixed generations nvidia cards ;)
@Sohzy Жыл бұрын
@carlosgarcia1165 why do you need 9 monitors 💀it doesnt even sound _that_ useful tbh
@Hadeks_Marow Жыл бұрын
3 is the limit. At 4, you are better up with a Dual PC setup, usually with some cheap laptop.
@VitisCZ Жыл бұрын
If you're someone struggling with having a short attention span and you use dual monitors try switching back to using single monitor. It personally really helped me at getting back the ability to focus on just one thing for longer periods of time without constantly checking discord or some other crap every 3 minutes
@Odah_ Жыл бұрын
If you're going to play competitive games, having just 2 monitors with something running in the background will make your input lag go up very much. You want the minium input lag you can have while playing these games.
@_aullik Жыл бұрын
Rather have a little lower performance than not having 3 monitors. That being said, i wonder if i can just add another small grafics card that handles the other 2 monitors
@micobugija6284 Жыл бұрын
You can. Best would be from the same manufacturer so you don't have to install 2 drivers
@adsads196 Жыл бұрын
I'd have personally used my igpu for the second monitor for watching vids etc if I had one.
@iommu426 Жыл бұрын
@@adsads196 This. I use my IGPU for my secondary monitor and configured my browser to always use the IGPU to get the decoding / 3D load away from the main GPU. Works great :)
@Pasi123 Жыл бұрын
I used to run a cheap GT 610 with a GT 660 for half of the monitors in a quad monitor setup. That was on a HEDT platform so it had enough PCIe lanes to keep both cards at x16 A bit later I used NVIDIA Surround on the GTX 660 for 3 of the monitors and the GT 610 for the extra monitor. Tbh the difference wasn't that big so at some point I stole the GT 610 for a different system and ran all 4 on the GTX 660. Nowadays I'm still running 4 monitors on just a single GTX 1080, though I don't use NVIDIA Surround anymore because of the inconvenience of 3 monitors showing up as one.
@micobugija6284 Жыл бұрын
@@deano1699 that is not how things work
@KenS1267 Жыл бұрын
I've used a 3 monitor setup at work for a very long time and now that I mostly work at home that setup has come home. I did some searching for a monitor that could easily handle switching from landscape to portrait as reading code for debugging is one of those times portrait is wonderful. There are some games, looking at you Elite Dangerous, that natively support multiple monitors and it makes immersion so much better.
@bradysimpson Жыл бұрын
3 27” 1440p monitors and an iPad for E:D; an ultrawide in portrait for inara, discord, and the dead site😢; and a 42” for KZfaq. I have a short of my setup, if you care.
@opmanzano Жыл бұрын
racing and flight simulators in general also can support multiple monitors, I use 2 screens in MSFS2020 and Xplane12 and it increases immersion a lot.
@johnguy8571 Жыл бұрын
I can't be bothered to spend 10 minutes watching this. I'm just going to follow my belief, since I've not tested this, that using multiple monitors has no impact.
@Fire32Ball Жыл бұрын
Yeah it’s pretty unnoticeable. From 1-5% fps difference (according to the video), where one percent is 4 monitors at 1080p and 5% is 4 monitors at 4K.
@GrugGaming5 ай бұрын
Not to mention the power... Lol wtf monitor out there using 80 watts of power??? My main one only uses 50 max and the second monitor is 10 watts... Ya heard me mf 10 watts pulling from the WALL. Lol
@samtherat6 Жыл бұрын
Yooo, love that you guys were streaming VLDL! They’re really underrated!
@Bluepixels8 Жыл бұрын
I don't know why I'm surprised at this point... Seeing VLDL videos playing on the monotors was something I did not expect to see. Cool!
@robpet198 Жыл бұрын
Love your recent tests, LMG, though I find the conclusion here to be a bit incomplete. It would be nice to see more in depth how extra monitors affect the overall system delays like input lag and render consistency. Personally I've always noticed that something was off whenever using the second monitor. Even though the frames are very similar, the feeling is way different. Examples of tests: Timings + fps consistency when only 1 monitor connected to GPU Timings + fps consistency when 2 monitors connected to GPU Timings when 1 monitor is connected to GPU and 1 to integrated graphics Try to add more monitors to the mix. 1, 2, 3, 4 with same spec vs different specs.
@DaddyFrosty Жыл бұрын
Yeah I was also dissapointed that it wasn't tested, not sure if it's placebo, but I did "notice" that when I upgraded to my 1080 Ti and couldn't use my 2nd monitor cuz no DVI port.
@cjbtlr Жыл бұрын
This is more of a Gamers Nexus type analysis and not the sort of "tip of the iceberg" that LMG does. If you haven't noticed, the primary point of the video is to sell the monitors linked in the description below.
@robpet198 Жыл бұрын
@@cjbtlr Not sure if you've noticed, but LBG Labs is partially up and running. If they find a way of automating the testing method, they can gather a ton of data about latencies and stuttering
@theocramez Жыл бұрын
100% agree on this. "2 screens on a tower PC" and "2 screens on a laptop (which means one integrated screen and one external screen)" is a completely different deal.
@rustyshakelford1466 Жыл бұрын
Is it? more monitors is more system resources used, which will lower your game performance, same as running multiple programs while you game. This has been known forever, and frankly shouldn't be an issue unless you're running a very under-powered machine. Overdriven monitors causing unintended clock behavior and effecting power consumption is a much bigger rabbit hole.
@CarlosDeLosMuertes Жыл бұрын
I was hoping you would expand testing a bit to show if you get any performance hit on your main GPU if you have your extra monitors on a separate one? My guess would be no hit since those tasks should now be done on the other GPU, but maybe there is a surprising answer?
@frabb602511 ай бұрын
As a long-time multi-monitor user, I have been wondering for a long time whether it really makes a big difference if you use static images on the second or third screen while gaming. I have recently been a user of a Ryzen 7000 system and have now connected the second and third monitors to the mainboard via the CPU and the main monitor is still connected to my nvidia GPU. Works perfectly, even with VMs and Citrix Workspace across different monitors. I just haven't been able to determine the difference in performance yet. Maybe something for a follow up? thanks for the video
@doctorz73056 ай бұрын
I was looking for a comment like this. I have 3 monitors right now (Have a 4th, but I need an adapter) I was curious if it'd be better to have just the 4k on the gpu and the other 2 on the on-board
@samowen-hughes561 Жыл бұрын
You had Viva La Dirt League on the monitors, I love them so much
@boastyy Жыл бұрын
Would be interesting to see how having a second monitor connected effects the latency when playing games.
@blaness13 Жыл бұрын
There's no reason why it would affect latency, any sort of latency would be seen as a drop in FPS, not how fast those frames get to the screen. Using more screens and having pixels move on them obviously uses GPU power, I don't honestly know why this video made it seem so shocking or unexpected,
@MrGrannyStylez Жыл бұрын
and power draw
@OGPatriot03 Жыл бұрын
@@blaness13 I have to assume a bunch of multi-monitor users said "There's no downside" and that must've been a running myth.
@zachc4451 Жыл бұрын
@@blaness13 For a long time, people said it was no issue. No downsides. 1:1 performance. Even today, you can see that this wasn't true when you search back to days past and look at the driver issues Nvidia used to (and, in my experience, still in some cases do) have with mismatched refresh rates for example.
@blaness13 Жыл бұрын
@@OGPatriot03 I guess it depends on what you consider a real downside, If they dropped FPS just by being plugged in and turned on then sure, thats a downside, but i don't consider losing 1 or 2 frames for active content on them a downside when you can just stop the content, its a common sense trade off, like getting a higher res monitor,
@r3kop6 ай бұрын
BUT LINUS, HOW WILL I EVER HAVE MY TENTACLES HENTAI AND NARUTO ANIME RUNNING WHILE I PLAY HELLO KITTY WORLD AT THE SAME TIME WITHOUT THE EXTRA MONITOR???
@ilyaklimenko5666 Жыл бұрын
- What are we? - Maggers. - What muggers do? - They... mug people. - Sooo... LET'S MUG THEM
@mattthemouse1 Жыл бұрын
I want to see Linus and the team do a sound setup using a home theater receiver hooked up via HDMI
@Seed Жыл бұрын
So happy I ordered 2 new monitors today. Couldn't you have released this 2 hours ago?
@olibobs1411 Жыл бұрын
Mate the benefits outweigh the problems you'll be alright 👍
@ThePgR777 Жыл бұрын
Just turn them off when playing
@krazhmatik13 Жыл бұрын
Who needs a screen while playing anyway fuck it let engine owning take over 🤣 🤣
@Erik-mn5zc Жыл бұрын
enjoy your monitors! as a purely laptop user for everything I love having 2 monitors, or in the case of my macbook/iPad setup, I love that I can extend my display onto iPad to have a second monitor. it’s great for productivity, when Im making designs, taking notes, studying, researching, etc. even if it’s so I can have Apple music playing with its cool color changing thing with the music or lyrics it just feels nicer and a quality of life improvement. it’s not for everyone and I do get distracted at times but overall it’s helpful to me and is helpful for many others, given I also don’t need such extreme performances most times and when i do typically the second or third monitor don’t seem to affect me much but I will plan to not have them connected with heavier loads having watched this video
@Suwawako Жыл бұрын
Weird verified channel
@julianmoney9956 Жыл бұрын
*looks at my single monitor* “perhaps I have judged you too harshly”
@ScottFive Жыл бұрын
You can rip my extra monitors from my cold, dead hands. lol
@Moonclan0 Жыл бұрын
Would be nice if he talked about having multiple monitors with for example in the case of 2 monitors, have main gaming monitor plugged into GPU, and second monitor plugged into the Motherboard. Would be curious to see the comparison between 2 monitors in a GPU and 1 in each.
@Bureaucromancer Жыл бұрын
A look at what happens if the monitors are on independent GPUs would be interesting, especially in terms of what happens if you use an iGPU for a secondary display. For my part, doing the gaming VM in a NAS thing it’s been an easy path to enabling multiple VMs when I actually want a second seat.
@rockking1379 Жыл бұрын
I liked the idea of arc, not for a gaming Gpu, but rather to handle the workload of second and third monitors.
@milescarter7803 Жыл бұрын
I too want to see this. Intel back to third gen has 3 monitor output. 12th gen (maybe 11th too?) Has 4 monitor outputs. Also a second card with multiple outputs is $15-20. NVS510, FirePro W4100 or W5100 etc.
@det_tf2 Жыл бұрын
I'd love this, I've got a spare 1050 hanging out in my computer from my old build and would love to see if running my second monitor off it would help. My CPU doesn't have integrated graphics so that isn't an option unfortunately.
@tylerkulchinsky2167 Жыл бұрын
I put 2x 1080 Ti in my gaming PC but had one going to my monitor and one going to my TV. It worked shockingly well, but I couldn't control the RGB on the second one, and using one heated up the other because they were literally stacked on top of one another
@Galiant2010 Жыл бұрын
This was my original plan for my 12600k and 4070ti build, but I only found out after buying that the BIOS on the Z690 platform doesn't allow you to enable the iGPU if you have a dedicated GPU enabled. It's one or the other. Which is pretty stupid. I check the BIOS updates occasionally to see if they've changed that, but haven't seen it yet.
@alpaknan21894 ай бұрын
0:42 he just turned into a Nokia 3310 for half a sec
@DaggerStyle Жыл бұрын
If LTT says it, you know it's most likely incorrect. Their test results are as accurate as Stewie Wonders dart record
@flamingscar5263 Жыл бұрын
Note: this performance loss can be entirely circumvented with either a 2nd GPU or iGPU handling the 2nd display, this is as easy as plugging the display into the other GPU and then anything on that display should run on the 2nd GPU, and if not you still always can force it to in windows settings It is a bit overkill to have a 2nd GPU for like 2 fps average, but if you already have an iGPU, why not
@mehmetariftasl8277 Жыл бұрын
How do i plug it to my igpu
@PhantomCrestTV Жыл бұрын
@@mehmetariftasl8277Plug it into your motherboard. But only do this for secondary displays.
@Druggerrnaut Жыл бұрын
@@mehmetariftasl8277 Usually the display port (hdmi, dp, vga, etc) on the motherboard instead of the gpu itself. Depends on your CPU too.
@stoney202 Жыл бұрын
That doesn't work, the workload is still taking by the primary GPU it's just shunted through the seconds connector. Even with SLI this is how it was done. It's been quite a few years since I ran a multi GPU setup but even after the death of SLI the best you could ever get the second GPU to do was physx workloads.
@JordanPlayz158 Жыл бұрын
@@stoney202I'm sure that depends on config though? I do know if you set your primary gpu to x, I think it would make sense for it to go through primary but if not, don't know why they'd assume you want it to go through a second gpu automatically
@Loop_Kat Жыл бұрын
Would be interesting to see another video like this involving a similar multi-monitor issue, that being the fact that having multiple monitors with _differing_ refresh rates can sometimes cause inconsistent frame timings or even actual refresh rate drops with a faster monitor trying to match a slower one (ex: 144Hz briefly dipping down to 60Hz) While I've never experienced the refresh rate drops myself, my frame timings have always felt inconsistent (even with G-sync) and the only way I can get a valid result on the UFO test is by setting my 144Hz monitor down to 60Hz to match my secondary monitor (the test always stutters or fails to sync at 144Hz). So I'm very curious to know if the labs team could produce any helpful information about all of this
@Xenoray1 Жыл бұрын
i use myself 144hz 1440p monitor for gaming and second 1080p 60hz one for video while playing, i had zero issues so far with frame drops on my amd gpu for like 6 years
@Forlong21 Жыл бұрын
I run a 240 Hz HDR monitor and a 60 Hz for my secondary. The only real solution I use is to use Borderless Windowed mode and it seems to help out a ton though I do sacrifice a few frames to make it work like that. Ideally all the monitor's should be the same spec.
@leonro Жыл бұрын
That's why it's highly recommended to use multiples of the same display for a multi-monitor setup. You get the same refresh rate, same resolution, size, and no weird behaviour when moving windows from one display to another (or if it's on multiple monitors!).
@tiemenscholten3755 Жыл бұрын
This is still a thing? Good lord
@gamingbud926 Жыл бұрын
I have the opposite problem. Strangely and occasionally, my secondary monitor (60Hz), will drop to something like 10Hz on startup. Turning it off and on again does the trick. Might actually just be a problem with the monitor itself, because I seem to remember that unplugging it form and replugging it back into the GPU does not fix it.
@Kaziklu Жыл бұрын
Those Monitors were Mugging Performance...
@paul_sanchez7 ай бұрын
this has got to be the best sponsor sideway ever hahaha
@Neko2394 Жыл бұрын
The vram usage will also increase as you add up monitors. Also, it's a bit of a niche case but I noticed that running two displays on different GPUs (e.g on a laptop, the built in display running on the igpu and the second one running on the discrete gpu) will also increase the driver overhead
@SwitchTalkChannel Жыл бұрын
I have a bad random laptop and running Acer monitor from that. I run into some issues, possibly caused by this. But, the laptop is bad and needs to be cleaned, dust-wise, too. But, everything works fine most of the time, just not for gaming, and it sometimes turns itself off recently (though this is likely caused by some other issues I've not yet fixed, haha).
@Joe-Dead Жыл бұрын
running two monitors on different cards, both nvidia but different generations, previously it was a single gpu driving two monitors. even with two drivers essentially considering different generations performance is better with the two gpus one driving each monitor. as to why this, so i can game without a performance hit and watch stuff on the other monitor and nvidia iray which doesn't care if gpus, cards, generations or memory matches as long as they're nvidia it will use them to render.
@jupdown Жыл бұрын
A year ago I had a 5 monitor setup on a Radeon RX580. They were all 1080p and arranged in two rows - the top row having two monitors and the bottom having three. At IDLE with NOTHING open on Windows 11, it was consuming ~3GB of VRAM. Because of this arrangement, I had a virtual resolution of 5760x2160 with dead space on either side of the top row of monitors. I’m not sure if that contributed to the VRAM usage or not, but I did want to second your statement - that more monitors = more VRAM usage.
@Ajyia Жыл бұрын
Honestly, the last point hits the hardest for me. I used to have videos running on a second monitor, or an active chat or whatever, but somewhere along the line I remembered how much more enjoyable the gaming experience is when you actually focus on it.
@quandrixtwincaster57389 ай бұрын
Don't care. I will gladly sacrifice some performance to keep my extra monitor. After using two, I don't get how people can use less.
@cameronmoerer62446 ай бұрын
Bro that Kick joke thrown in killed me.
@siberionhusky9225 Жыл бұрын
Question. Is there a reason Labs didn't run the same tests with secondary monitors connected to CPU integrated graphics? Since current gen CPUs from both teams now have integrated graphics (basically across the board), I feel like this might have less of an impact on FPS as (especially at higher resolutions) more load is on the GPU vs CPU.
@SkyblowDK Жыл бұрын
most gaming intels dont have a intergretaed gpu
@TAP7a Жыл бұрын
@@SkyblowDKonly the F models
@Masterblack1991 Жыл бұрын
The igpu "steal" memory from the ram you have and use as vram. So it's better to use the dedicated GPU to run the second monitor. When i connected the second monitor to my motherboard (using the igpu) my ram go from 16gb to 12gb.
@potatoes5829 Жыл бұрын
@@Masterblack1991 only as much as you set in the bios, and generally by default its 128mb to 256mb, so it should be nothing to be concerned about
@jarnea.7988 Жыл бұрын
This is exactly what I do, gaming screen runs in GPU. Secondary screen of integrated graphics
@Zeet1 Жыл бұрын
A video about best vertical monitors would be awesome. The viewing angle on the 27 inch I flipped vertically isn’t the best but not sure what to look into for a replacement 🎉
@martinsung7280 Жыл бұрын
you should try using an ips or va panel, they have great viewing angles
@givemeyourmangoes5040 Жыл бұрын
Rtings has good statistics for viewing angles and which monitors can be rotated vertically without a vesa mount
@neothermic1 Жыл бұрын
Sounds like your 27" is a TN, so the viewing angles are asymmetrical. A good IPS screen should do you for 178 degrees in both directions (meaning it'd be totally fine for vertical flipping), rather than TN's atypical 170/160, with horrific off-axis colour shifts.
@bobito3861 Жыл бұрын
you ALWAYS always always always (seriously always) wanna use a curved monitor for portrait mode, even if you dont like them in landscape as a main monitor. i swear its like curved monitor were actually created to solve this exact problem.
@x-shift89378 ай бұрын
That sponsorship transition is probably the e smoothest I’ve ever seen
@genkagmiregaming Жыл бұрын
single monitor pc + a laptop on my desk for twitch chat is the golden method
@Crantic Жыл бұрын
6:50 Kick 🔛🔝
@officialsawzer Жыл бұрын
0:57 Oh look, an ACTUAL segue for once
@lowercvse Жыл бұрын
0:58 The writers have become too good at transitioning to an ad read.
@Gaskinmoo794 ай бұрын
The first person to ever use two monitors on a PC must have felt like they were inventing the wheel.
@Sperrus Жыл бұрын
Could you do a video on running multiple displays at different framerates? This should be quite common with many people buying a new high refresh rate monitor for gaming and using their old 60Hz as a secondary. Apparently windows really does not like this. In my case plugging both monitors into the gpu completely kills gsync and there are massive framerate drops on the main monitor whenever something was moving on the secondary. My only fix for this was plugging the secondary 60Hz monitor into the mainboard to run on the iGPU
@root_path Жыл бұрын
I sometimes use my old 60hz display as a secondary to my 165hz main, and I don't have these issues. Plugged into the same GPU and all. Performance drops and/or stutter when video on 2nd is playing sure - depends on how heavy the game is since I'm using an old GTX1060. But VRR on main display works fine in this scenario and I have no massive FPS drops. However, my 2nd monitor is plugged in via DVI while main is on DisplayPort so this could be the reason why.
@softxpandguest708 Жыл бұрын
I suspect this is one of those issues that's been known about for years and companies will shuttle the blame back and forth between each other. I've absolutely seen this issue before - a friend's computer which otherwise ran flawlessly would hitch down to ~20 fps in 3d games, if his (older) secondary monitor was plugged in. On the other hand, I've built and used plenty of setups with multiple monitors *without* Windows having a problem, including using g-sync with both monitors plugged into the GPU. It just seems to break on certain hardware configurations, especially with older GPUs / monitors.
@vadnegru Жыл бұрын
I have a problem with different scaling, it's just blurry on 100% monitor. I also have projector with hdmi switch, one input is PC and another is Android TV stick. So if switch is selected android, PC stutters and frameskips, even if im not using the projector. Also if i use the projector and pc is turned off, fans will glow dimly.
@CanIHasThisName Жыл бұрын
This has already been fixed in Windows 10. If you're still experiencing that, there's some other issue you're experiencing.
@saurabh_tanwar Жыл бұрын
8:39 just skipped a heartbeat there 😅
@ArjunSureshtheman27 күн бұрын
Exactly 😂😂
@boodi1170 Жыл бұрын
hmm how much of those numbers are acurate?
@Cormyre11 ай бұрын
Ran into this issue a handful of years back, running a 144hz 1080p gaming monitor for main, and two portrait 60hz 1080p IPS monitors on either side of it (web dev / DBA) on a GTX 1080, everything seemed to be ok. Picked up a 4k monitor for my Playstation, had it above my main PC gaming monitor, figured "it's just sitting there during work hours, I should just hook my PC up to it and watch videos during the day on it instead of the portrait monitors". My poor GPU had a meltdown with the added load and was running sub 30hz just existing in that config. Nowadays, the PC is on a single 244hz 1080p gaming monitor, with a LG DualUp hooked up to my MacBook. PC is much happier since I'm still running that GTX 1080, it's given me a few extra years out of this system without a hit to my productivity.
@DerrekOlson Жыл бұрын
I feel it would have been interesting to see what running secondary displays does to performance when running those displays on a second GPU for example using integrated graphics for secondary displays and then your GPU for the single primary display.
@JA39785 Жыл бұрын
I run a second video card connected to my second display to watch streams while gaming and it removes a massive amount of in-game stuttering. No need to even run any benchmarks it's so painfully obvious. If you do this you have to make sure to set your secondary display as your main display in windows or else the gaming GPU will still be decoding video.
@auricksuess8743 Жыл бұрын
Yeah I got a cpu with instigated graphics for that reason. Pls talk about in next video!
@HazewinDog Жыл бұрын
that's what I used to do. I could notice the difference in performance, and would highly recommend it. it's one of the reasons why I think you shouldn't buy an F-series Intel CPU.
@THE-X-Force Жыл бұрын
How can I dedicate the integrated GPU (on the CPU) to handle tasks like that, please? (edit .. wait lol .. is it just as simple as plugging the other display into the mobo port for the IGPU .. or is there more to it than that .. settings, optimizations, etc.?)
@Kratosssferico Жыл бұрын
@@THE-X-Force connect the second monitor to the motherboard
@ibonitog Жыл бұрын
The worst thing is that both AMD and NVIDIA are seemingly unable to fix the high-power-draw bug for multi monitor setups! My 2070s uses 50-60W while my two monitors are connected. Sometimes there are tweaks and workarounds to get power draw back to 15-20W, but that doesn't work for everyone or every case. It’s insane how both of these huge companies have not solved these issues for years(!) now.
@northvalley067 ай бұрын
i legit cannot imagine being a Gamer and not having task manager open on a second monitor to always see your performances . Also having something to see your CPU temperatures ? and GPU usage ? i think i would be so anxious to play new games without seeing if my hardware is lowkey burning in the background. Because from my years of monitoring, it happens alot that a game looks fine on your monitor (with ok FPS) but its actually using 95% of your CPU and running on the maximum temperature "allowed" at the same time. 2 monitors is a must for me and my Anxiety problem :)
@jonjones99175 ай бұрын
i have not played on nvidia in awhile but surely they have some function similar to amd with a customizable overlay feature for games xD
@blu_vin2 ай бұрын
guys i have been waiting for a video like this for so long and i'm watching most of your videos for years now, how could i miss this
@simpson6700 Жыл бұрын
curious that you never mentioned refresh rates, they made a huge difference in frametiming for me. with a secondary 60hz monitor i had lots of stutters on my 144hz main monitor, but once i switched to a 144hz 2nd monitor those issues went away.
@alecpanic Жыл бұрын
I swear this has been something that's been hitting me for years whenever i tried to run games at high fps. surprisingly little converage on this issue, since a lot of people will use old cheap monitors for the second display that cannot matcht the high refresh rate of their main monitor
@VexxedSR Жыл бұрын
I use a 240hz s2522hg and a 70hz (old 1080p 60hz benq with a 10hz OC no freesync or gsync) and have no difference in stutters on my main monitor from tests were I was troubleshooting crashes and stuttering in a game and completely unplugged the 2nd monitor while also removing any windows drivers left over from it. I have an i3 12100f so no iGPU, both monitors connected to one GPU.
@VexxedSR Жыл бұрын
Forgot to add that I managed to solve the stutter/crash and tested again for curiosity sake to see how much performance I was losing and it was negligible, no stutters. PCs are wonderful but sometimes the random issues people can get with a combination of hardware, software, drivers and monitors can make you pull your hair out.
@VexxedSR Жыл бұрын
@@Xio_XDnow that makes me wonder if I was running my second monitor with the 10hz oc applied at the time that I was troubleshooting. I'll have to do some tests to see if running 60 or 70 has stutter problems but I've not seen any in csgo/battlebit all smooth for now running 240/70
@sorunaz Жыл бұрын
@@Xio_XDdoes the little variation have an effect on this? example my main is at 239.964 and my other is at 119.982. i just lowered it from 143.981 but its max is 239.757. would it be best to keep the second one at 120 or increase ot to match the main 240? i only lowered it for power consumption
@stealthgyro Жыл бұрын
Should also test mixed refresh rates, turning off/on hardware acceleration on various pieces of software, exclusive full screen vs borderless/window. mixed HDR. This headache has gotten better in recent years, but especially Vista to Win10 DWM with mixed refresh rates and window'd mode games would seemingly cause the game to stutter down to the lowest refresh consistently. EDIT: Also I do think layout can mess with it as well especially portrait next to landscape, which it does appear y'all did test. I think the "virtual canvas" has to be even larger, because of monitor layout.
@bdubs85 Жыл бұрын
I'm running into this right now. 175hz display paired with 2 60hz screens are causing micro stutters even if plugged into integrated graphics.
@ericmullen14 Жыл бұрын
@@bdubs85 I had the same issue wanting to run my 1440p at 165hz with another 1440p at 60Hz, dropping the 165*Hz down to 120Hz and no more stutter/hitches/tears. More recently I OC'd the 60Hz pannel to 72Hz and 144Hz is fine on the main, with the 165/72 combo it becomes way less noticeable than 165/60 but still present
@Sebaex Жыл бұрын
@@ericmullen14 So, in theory, as long as your secondary monitor runs at a refresh rate that's a multiple of your main screen, in your case 144/72, it should run the best rather than using more mismatches values Still, which OS do you have?
@jatoxo Жыл бұрын
YES. High refresh monitor + 60Hz second monitor is a super common setup and the source of so many issues. I'm running 144Hz + 60Hz and was getting around 30ms of lag every couple of seconds when discord was open on my second monitor. At one point my main screen would be capped to 60Hz when watching a video on the second monitor. A different 60Hz monitor amplified this problem so much more, having discord running on it would it make it (discord) super laggy and almost unusable, but only when the main monitor was set to 144Hz
@ericmullen14 Жыл бұрын
@@Sebaex windows 10, if it's half at least the initial logic to try it was the frame generation pacing would be equal between the two, the slower doubling frames but the frame pacing is equal
@corvoswsattano Жыл бұрын
All the people working and watching this on the side must have gotten a jump scare with that Teams notif.
@travisjackson-ey8zl Жыл бұрын
Really loved that transition into the sponsor.
@dwal3486 Жыл бұрын
This was a good video. a while back I tried to determine through benchmarks if my 2nd screen was hindering my performance. as far as i could tell it wasn't having an effect. but my 2nd screen always had idle apps on screen, now I better understand why this was the case. for me having extra utility is worth the minute performance hit. I appreciate what you guys and the other tech channels do, so I don't have figure everything out for myself.
@Winterwizzard122110 ай бұрын
Linus talking about notifications somehow triggered my brain to remember I had to buy a ticket to an event before the cut off. That just saved me from an angry girlfriend.
@maximecollet30 Жыл бұрын
that teams notification sound made my heart rate spike, please don't
@c0d3warrior Жыл бұрын
Thanks for making this video and clearing things up and quantifying the effects. My personal take from this is that having a browser or chat window open on the 2nd screen doesn't have that huge of an impact. 👍
@SteveDonev Жыл бұрын
Sure but a second monitor costs money and takes up space. I can do all my browsing and discord on my phone while gaming and it’s way more space efficient
@HaziqNR Жыл бұрын
I'm using one monitor straight from the graphics card and the 2nd monitor from the motherboard (yes Intel integrated graphics). From what I can tell, the 2nd monitor still uses the graphics card and does affect performance a little bit. I'll be interesting if the Labs team can follow up this video with this configuration.
@sja2095 Жыл бұрын
It will definitely affect performance, intel integrated graphics uses your ram and will heat up your cpu as the integrated gpu shares the same package as your CPU.
@LoyalSage Жыл бұрын
I didn’t do any scientific testing, but when I upgraded from a GTX 770 to a 1080, I put both cards in for a while to run each monitor, and there was a noticeable lag when moving a window across the boundary between displays that went away when I took out the 770 and ran both off the 1080.
@AlfaPro1337 Жыл бұрын
@@sja2095 Considering that 32GB are starting to become the norm, heck i have 128GB, a few megs being used by your iGPU doesn't even matter. Plus, considering that a non-F CPU still output the same heat output as a F CPU, it' doesn't matter. It's not iGPU costing you 100W.
@dustinbrueggemann1875 Жыл бұрын
@@sja2095 Some intel integrated graphics actually used to be hidden on the northbridge chip. I don't think they've done that in a while, but it is worth noting.
@AltonV Жыл бұрын
@@dustinbrueggemann1875 now the igpu is located inside the cpu
@orenders11 ай бұрын
*please test gaming laptop with internal display and through hdmi, its shocking results *
@TheInsaneupsdriver6 ай бұрын
"most people won't be playing 3 full instances while gaming" I beg to differ sir, I got 3 in 4k 72" main, 2 43" in portrait turned inwards at 55 degrees. LOVE IT! dual stick mounted directly to my chair with a tablet mouse pad and Razer Tartarus Pro mounted at 50 degrees for my hurt wrist. No desk at all. My question you didn't answer is how much of a difference when stretching the game across all screens.