List Of All Active Aircraft Carriers That Are In Service (2021)

Рет қаралды 2,035,286

2 жыл бұрын

Check out the Military playlist from the Buzz: • 10 Most Expensive Mili...
------------
Video description: Aircraft carrier is considered the most valuable sea-based asset, and offers an incomparable military instrument with its ability to project tactical Air Power over long distances. Yet only few countries have them and there are only 22 Active Aircraft Carriers. This video presents a list of all the Active Aircraft Carriers of the world that are in service.
Enjoy watching. Cheers!
------------
Credits:
free3d.com/
www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/...
www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/...
www.globalsecurity.org/milita...
grabcad.com/library/aircraft-...
www.the-blueprints.com/bluepr...
military.wikia.org/wiki/Queen...
www.valka.cz/ESP-LHS-Juan-Car...
www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/... by Omegavision
www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/... by Infinite3dfx
www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/...
www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/... Omegavision
www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/... by Omegavision
www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/...
www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/...
www.turbosquid.com/de/3d-mode...
www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/...
------------
FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
* Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
The Buzz does not own the rights to these videos and pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com.

Пікірлер: 2 200

@Roset595 2 жыл бұрын

Other countries: "Yay I made the list!" USA: "I am the list."

@royinglemon3654 2 жыл бұрын

FUCKING "A"

@onlythewise1 2 жыл бұрын

all roads lead to new York thanks to great whites or Europeans

@williamsupinski64 2 жыл бұрын

America...Fuck yeah! Coming agian to save the mother fuckin day yeah!

@onlythewise1 2 жыл бұрын

@@williamsupinski64 ya right

@williamsupinski64 2 жыл бұрын

@@onlythewise1 um, it's a joke. Have you ever seen the movie'Team America' its funny as hell.

@patrickfinnegan9106 2 жыл бұрын

So I will note that multiple light aircraft carriers or amphibious assault ships were noted for other nations outside of the US. The US not only has 11 active supercarriers (all of which have an air wing twice the size of the next nation's largest), but also an additional 16 light carriers/amphibious assault ships that carry 25+ aircraft, including the VTOL, F35-Lightning II and Harrier.

@dreadfulbodyguard7288 2 жыл бұрын

US isn't preparing for war with other countries. They are preparing for alien invasion.

@cascadesouthernmodeltrains7547 2 жыл бұрын

@@dreadfulbodyguard7288 for that we need the Iowas back in service. Didn’t you see the movie?

@RealHank1791 2 жыл бұрын

@@cascadesouthernmodeltrains7547 Don't forget the South Dakota class. 3/4 the length but faster without compromising armor or armaments.

@cascadesouthernmodeltrains7547 2 жыл бұрын

@@RealHank1791 that gives us 2 more ships.

@maolo76 2 жыл бұрын

A hypersonic missiles from a Mig31 and everyone would be sunk

@filippomunari8147 2 жыл бұрын

fun fact: after WW2 italy can’t have aircraft carriers, we overcome this problem calling them “navi a ponte lungo” (long-deck ships) this is what is called a pro gamer move

@giuliomachiavelli3414 2 жыл бұрын

O portaeromobili

@taotao98103 2 жыл бұрын

I guess the UN just look the other way otherwise people can use their eyes.

@thelitsquad2718 2 жыл бұрын

I believe it was recently announced that Japan was going to have an aircraft carrier

@aflyingcowboy31 2 жыл бұрын

@@thelitsquad2718It's not classified as an aircraft carrier, after WW2 a similar thing happened to Japan as with Italy. Under the Japanese constitution "land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained" so to get around this the Japanese have labelled their "aircraft carriers" as Multi-Purpose Destroyers even though for all intents and purpose it is of course an aircraft carrier.

@jdb47games 2 жыл бұрын

The Royal Navy in the 1970's initially classed the Invincible class carriers as 'through decked cruisers' as the British government had taken a policy decision a decade earlier to build no more aircraft carriers.

@Rockhound6165 2 жыл бұрын

I had never seen an aircraft carrier before. Until one night we were driving past NY Harbor and one was anchored there. I was simply blown away how massive it was. It was as tall as a skyscraper.

@Lemurion287 2 жыл бұрын

I used to live near Bremerton WA, and I remember driving past the mothball fleet and the reserve carriers were so big it felt like they were towering over you. Just stunning.

@tuftyterror983 2 жыл бұрын

Live in port orchard just across the water from Bremerton. They still have one or two mothballs, but over half of em got scrapped recently.

@Lemurion287 2 жыл бұрын

@@tuftyterror983 yeah, this was almost 20 years ago, and I was living in Port Orchard at the time.

@tuftyterror983 2 жыл бұрын

@@Lemurion287 yeah. Thats cool. Port Orchard is still, well, Port Orchard. Just a small-ish town with lots of antique and thrift stores.

@larryoneill7432 Жыл бұрын

That’s the USS Intrepid. It’s a museum now

@misterboot6682 2 жыл бұрын

As a Canadian I don't like war but I'm happy we are friends with the Yankees 😅

@MacTac141 2 жыл бұрын

Hopefully Canada finally starts investing in our military. We have more coastline than any other country and we can’t even protect it ourselves, let alone project any semblance of naval power If Australia with an economy hundreds of billions smaller can afford 2 aircraft carriers, what’s our excuse for being so weak?

@Justin-ui5ti 2 жыл бұрын

@@MacTac141 I suppose because Canada has considerable protection with the US military. Alaska is to the North so Canada has Northern support from there to ensure that Russia doesn't get any ideas. The defense of Canada is in the best interest of the US because if Canada is ever attacked, the US is in grave threat of getting attacked. Australia doesn't have that luxury, hence why they have to be a bit more investing into their military defense.

@starwarsfannumber Жыл бұрын

And us veterans are also proud of our candidan allies and we are not Yankees that was a baseball that had no players go to the war when just about every other American sports teams did

@cpa2132 Жыл бұрын

You guys are the best neighbors, you better believe we'll have you backs when needed 🍻

@sachithkn6512 Жыл бұрын

Just wait.., don't over happy... U Have khalistan society and Muslim society

@meme_thunder 2 жыл бұрын

"The Boeing AV-8B Harrier" As a Brit, that sentence hurts me.

@davidrussell8783 2 жыл бұрын

It's OK if you want to refer to it as McDonnell Douglas )

@vergulli12 2 жыл бұрын

Wait until that Harrier lands on the USS George Washington 😛

@jbloun911 Жыл бұрын

Brits made junk as usual so the US had to make it actually work. Sorry Redcoat

@meme_thunder Жыл бұрын

@@davidrussell8783 No. The Harrier is a British plane made by Hawker Siddley. The design was sold to Macdonell Douglass a few years later. I want to call it the Hawker Siddley Harrier because that's it original name.

@meme_thunder Жыл бұрын

@@vergulli12 Still an origonal British plane that the US just bought the design off.

@crispyglove 2 жыл бұрын

I think it would be more accurate to say that HMS Queen Elizabeth was named after the super-dreadnought HMS Queen Elizabeth which was named after QE I.

@albertocastoldi9951 2 жыл бұрын

Actually US Navy has 10 more carriers: 8 LHDs and 2 LHAs, each capable of carrying up to 20-22 f 35Bs....Anyway one of the LHDs (Uss Bonhomme Richard) has been decommissioned last year due to a big fire while was in a naval base...

@fredjones7705 2 жыл бұрын

Shame about the Bonny Dick. I used to see her in San Diego when I was making bicycle deliveries.

@kyleaugustine6886 2 жыл бұрын

I remember that fire. Shame what happened to her.

@tunnel598 2 жыл бұрын

7 lhds now that lhd 6 is gone

@RB25luv 2 жыл бұрын

🇺🇸💯🇺🇸💯🇺🇸

@erikahl7180 Жыл бұрын

🤓

@saltyroe3179 2 жыл бұрын

Besides the Wasp Class and America Class the Japanese have what they call Helicopter Destroyers. The latest are bigger than IJN WW2 carriers and have operated F35 fighters.

@rakisuzuki-burke4148 2 жыл бұрын

The Izumos are also being converted into actual carriers.

@frankd.4528 2 жыл бұрын

I like to think I am a partial owner of those Nimitz class carriers every time I pay my taxes!

@khaccanhle1930 2 жыл бұрын

Nah, those boats are a reminder, "We own you"

@neilmanhard1341 2 жыл бұрын

You are. Every captain of every US Navy/Coast Guard ship knows who paid for them and treats them accordingly. USS is short for "United States Ship" - no question on who owns it.

@neilmanhard1341 2 жыл бұрын

@@khaccanhle1930 Ah, another person that believes the US military is a force of oppression. Well, don't expect us to come and rescue you anytime soon (or ever).

@mitchlesinski7803 2 жыл бұрын

@@khaccanhle1930 based on ur name … we actually own YOU bud.

@waynemerlo7448 2 жыл бұрын

Your not!

@themarqq 2 жыл бұрын

Russia: We have a Carrier, we are military power. USA: Hold my beer..

@Tonyx.yt. 2 жыл бұрын

US: we have the most powerfull armed forces in the world Taliban: hold my rusty ak...

@jayscott8583 2 жыл бұрын

@@Tonyx.yt. Blame politicians.

@Tonyx.yt. 2 жыл бұрын

@Andy Mills russia never claim that and ukraine gets foreign weapons, without them they would get fucked, and anyway they had far superior equipment and numbers than taliban "army"

@billyhgunn 2 жыл бұрын

@@Tonyx.yt. Russia we have never lost a War Taliban: Hold my hooka Ukraine: Hold my Chernihivske

@billyhgunn 2 жыл бұрын

@Andy Mills Ukraine No, you used to have one of the most powerful Armies in the World

@7thsealord888 2 жыл бұрын

Unmentioned here, but the Royal Australian Navy has HMASs Canberra and Adelaide, which are based on the design of Spain's 'Juan Carlos[ (which WAS mentioned). They only carry helicopters at present, but do have the "ski-jump' for operating STOVL aircraft.

@ghostpants6661 2 жыл бұрын

I don't think they are counting the Heli carriers

@andresmartinezramos7513 2 жыл бұрын

But since they don't operate fixed-wing aircraft, they don't fit the definition of a conventional aircraft carrier. Otherwise, one might argue that a frigate capable of deploying helicopters is also an aircraft carrier.

@johnhoward4397 2 жыл бұрын

@@andresmartinezramos7513 The video is about 2021, today. The Spanish have 15 Harrier II Plus like USA marines LHD, may be Australian in the future could buy 15 or 20 F35

@andresmartinezramos7513 2 жыл бұрын

@@johnhoward4397 Precisely, as things stood in 2021 the Canberra sub-class did not operate fixed-wing aircraft.

@andrewcraig5689 Жыл бұрын

@@ghostpants6661 They are not included as the US runs 8 Wasp Class and 3 America Class Carriers that were not mentioned including the Boxer which was deployed in the against the Somali pirates as seen in the movie Capt Phillips.

@sws5833 2 жыл бұрын

As a Canadian I wasnt aware of the size of the U.S carrier fleet and the number of aircraft they all can carry, DAMN thats some serious firepower, id be proud if our navy had even a tiny fraction of that strength

@alsmain794 2 жыл бұрын

No need for all those ships my Canadian friend, the US has got your back.

@Chpow01 2 жыл бұрын

@@alsmain794 You're not wrong... well, at least as long as a Republican is not in the Whitehouse.

@donnieb2000 2 жыл бұрын

@@Chpow01 Really ? Biden has only HURT and DIVIDE the USA. Trump put america 1st while democrats Incite 4 years of riots , a phony russia hoax, 2 sham impeachments, left americans behind to die, a wide open border as 2 mill illegals pour in with Fentynal killing more americans then covid, 40 year high inflation, sky high crime and murder as they DEFUND police, sky high gas, food, energy prices, vaccine mandates as Biden FIRES 1st responders, and now war in ukraine ALL Bidens FAULT as he stood by and did NOTHING until it was too late, but actually gave putin the green light when he DESTROYED american enery independence giving putin the leverage as he now fuels europe, not to mention this CREEP is caught LYING to our faces daily and the Doosh bag was HIDING in his basement all during covid putting himself 1st while TRUMP BROUGHT the WORLD A VACCINE front and center like a TRUE LEADER even catching covid while Democrats prayed for his death.. Never in my life seen so much evil and destruction to America and i once was a democrat. So get educated dont be a dumb ass follower of fake news..

@cameraz99 2 жыл бұрын

@@donnieb2000 -- You funnier than Chris Rock. Lol!

@donnieb2000 2 жыл бұрын

@@cameraz99 Funny you cant debate what i said that wasnt True. Fact you mentioned Chris rock tells me you support physical violence which makes sense your a Trump Hating democrat, RIOTS, HATE, VIOLENCE is what you value. Tell me what again Biden and the democrats have done for thre american people again. Come back when you have facts and a grown ass mature response. Typical Democrat response. lmao

@DrDre-ps4sd 2 жыл бұрын

I like how every country with an aircraft carrier is like a Nickel size with maybe 1 or two. Then the US is like hold my beer, I got 13 nuclear carriers

@ovrwrldkiler 2 жыл бұрын

And this video didnt even include our assault carriers that use VTOL aircraft and helis (despite inculding other VTOL only carriers like Italy's). There's another ~10 of those too.

@Cutieplus 2 жыл бұрын

Japan, the Izumo-class multi-purpose destroyers is currently converting into Izumo-class aircraft carrier. A few months ago, F-35B already tested take off and landing from the modified aircraft carrier.

@maolo76 2 жыл бұрын

@FEC Multimedia yes they should. They got the largest stockpile of plutonium.

@marcviej.5635 2 жыл бұрын

@FEC Multimedia bullshit

@user-qk7gk4ni5w Жыл бұрын

他们承认了就是航母，他们是准备侵略我们，我们不会再让悲剧重演，这次我们要保卫自己的家园。开战吧！

@jonfklein 2 жыл бұрын

Wow! This puts US naval power in perspective. The USA has 11 of the 22 total aircraft carriers in operation in the world and all of them are far larger than the other country's carriers.

@wstavis3135 2 жыл бұрын

As others have pointed out, the US also has 10 or 11 "amphibious assault carriers" which also have a standard air wing of either 6 F35Bs or 22 F35Bs when configured as purely CVs. This makes them as capable as the British or French CVs and more capable than any others in existence.

@jonfklein 2 жыл бұрын

@@wstavis3135 What's the saying, 'Speak softly and carry a big stick'? They have the big stick part down, that's for sure. But the speak softly part, not so much - would help them in their foreign policy I think.

@starwarsfannumber Жыл бұрын

Put this into perspective the USA navy ls the only force of this planet that would make our airforce break a sweat seriously if war broke between our navy and air force alot places will sank from all navy vessels and aircraft laying at the bottom the ocean the f22 raptor is king and our airforce got and answer for the world's navy the only force

@Axispaw1 Жыл бұрын

@@wstavis3135 Maybe you need to do a bit more research before commenting. The QE class can carry over 70 aircraft in a time of war, 50 of which would be F35B. Combined with the increased range, and far better sensors make the QE far more capable than a WASP class. The CdG can carry over 40 aircraft in wartime including 30 Rafale and E-2 Hawkeye (far better AEW than anything the WASP carries) and also has VLS for Aster 15. American amphibious vessels are incredibly powerful by all means, but lets not disparage the French and British carriers just because you love America.

@anonymous-go1tq Жыл бұрын

@@Axispaw1 I’ve only met British people online and most of them where pretty mad about that war 300 years ago still so I have no issue flexing Americas military power to them now the French part I agree with

@gunnyboone9079 2 жыл бұрын

the United Stares has 11 carrier groups on station ar all times, With 4 in reserve.

@imperatorsteve Жыл бұрын

Just goes to show why the USA is almost bankrupt

@enoughrope1638 2 жыл бұрын

The HTMS Chakri Naruebet is open for tourists. The ship has no operational fighters left and lacks the funding for maintenance/fuel. It is claimed to leave port once a month and travel under its own power. I genuinely think the Royal Thai Navy should dock her in freshwater (up a river perhaps) and keep the ship in reserve. Sealing off unused compartments, a handful of dehumidifiers, and they will save a ton of money.

@sergiom9958 2 жыл бұрын

That would be a smart move. Spain made her and also her sister (an original) ship, the AC "Príncipe de Asturias" (Prince of Asturias). Unfortunately, because the obvious lack of apreciation from the spanish political class and average Joe / Jose; the ship was desmantelated for lack of founds when it could had been stored for better times. The dumb ass policiticians considered that the money they could get from the scrap metal was worth the loss of it (and they sold it when the metal price was at its lowest).

@thibautmallet1194 2 жыл бұрын

nickname of the ship is the THAITANIC :-)

@dougmahone Жыл бұрын

Not open for all tourists. Only Thai nationals can go onboard. Foreigners are not allowed.

@jerski14344 2 жыл бұрын

U.S.Navy's Wasp-class (40 tons) and America-class (45 tons) should be in this list as they can carry and operate F-35 and Harrier jets, even Helicopters are technically a type of an "AIRcraft", Wasp-class is even heavier than the No. 1 (Chakri Naruebet) and No. 2 (Juan Carlos I) on this list, COMBINED!..

@RoKenX2 2 жыл бұрын

i was going to post this =P but you said it better than i could anyways =p

@ginge1394 2 жыл бұрын

But they aren’t aircraft carriers. They are amphibious assault ships.

@ginge1394 2 жыл бұрын

@fuckyoutubepolicy staff however they are not classed as aircraft carriers. They are amphibious assault ships.

@ginge1394 2 жыл бұрын

@fuckyoutubepolicy staff this is where you’re wrong. An aircraft carriers main purpose is to provide air superiority and its primary usage is that of aircraft. The wasp and Americas Maine purpose is spit a fuck load of marines and their equipment on a beach somewhere. The jets are a third or fourth tier of operation on the ship. What’s the point in calling it an aircraft carrier when it doesn’t function anything like an aircraft carrier?

@KVZ55 2 жыл бұрын

@fuckyoutubepolicy staff Not easy for the US carries get close to Taiwan when war broke out because China has hypersonic missiles that can sink the US carriers.

@jameskee2412 2 жыл бұрын

good job including the 11 Nuclear super carriers of the US but completely forgetting about all our amphibs. They were certainly good enough to be included for Italy.

@slappy-chicken 2 жыл бұрын

I'm proud to have served in the US Navy. Ironically, I never set foot on a ship since I was attached to one of the Navy's few expeditionary ground forces.

@kitkat47chrysalis95 2 жыл бұрын

Wtf?

@kitkat47chrysalis95 2 жыл бұрын

I need to know more about this weird phenomenon

@slappy-chicken 2 жыл бұрын

@@kitkat47chrysalis95 Look up Navy NECC

@naverilllang 2 жыл бұрын

@@slappy-chicken we can't expect the marines to do all of the work, now can we?

@andresmartinezramos7513 2 жыл бұрын

@@naverilllang Yeah, that's what the army is for

@mat3o557 Жыл бұрын

This was a great US navy video 👏

@dangernoodle7700 2 жыл бұрын

When people don't realize that the rest of the planet's definition of "Carrier" is our definition of an Amphibious Assault ship (US has 10 of them), whereas our definition of "Carrier" is the rest of the planets definition of Super Carrier (US additionally has nearly 13 of them plus to our Amphibious Assault ships).

@TravelwithPavel 2 жыл бұрын

Yeah all the other non US carriers look cute compared to US ones.

@Regunes 2 жыл бұрын

@@TravelwithPavel Charles De Gaulle?

@TravelwithPavel 2 жыл бұрын

@@Regunes yeah and? Charles de Gaulle is pretty small compared to Nimitz class, its just only other nuclear powered one, but thats it, but its leas than half the size.

@pougetguillaume4632 2 жыл бұрын

@@TravelwithPavel france has a larger carrier in the works for a decade or two named PANG (porte-avion nouvelle génération), it's quite a bit bigger than the current one but still pretty small when placed next to a super carrier. CDG load displacement: 42 000 tons PANG: 75 000 tons nimitz/Ford: 100 000 tons quite a decent chungus and a CATOBAR too

@TravelwithPavel 2 жыл бұрын

@@pougetguillaume4632 I know

@elbanoleon1037 Жыл бұрын

Really good

@bob_._. 2 жыл бұрын

If you're consider Spain's assault ship "Juan Carlos I" an aircraft carrier, why not include the world's 29 other assault ships? They all have full length flight decks and conduct aircraft operations.

@aceisto2268 2 жыл бұрын

The Juan Carlos I its main purpose are fixed wings aircraft operation, most of the rest of those shops CAN operate aircraft but they are mainly amphibius ships or helicopter carriers

@bob_._. 2 жыл бұрын

@@aceisto2268 I see. Thank you.

@crazyjds 2 жыл бұрын

Also the surface may not be rated to handle the heat of sa a landing harrier/f-35, which may require modifications. I think the Japan did that to thier helicopter destroyer.

@kitkat47chrysalis95 2 жыл бұрын

Because if those ships where classified as aircraft carriers then several countries would be breaking international laws, for instance: aircraft carrying assault ships may pass freely through Turkish waters into the black sea, but assault ship aircraft carriers may NOT. Also Japan is bound by international law to not operate "aircraft carriers" but aircraft carrying assault ships are A'Okay

@kitkat47chrysalis95 2 жыл бұрын

Surely several governments would object to this video if she included them, and it may even be taken down at their request.

@williambowling8211 2 жыл бұрын

One important distinction in assessing the power of these carriers is that all non-US carriers, except Charles de Gaulle, are STOBAR (or STOVL) which significantly limits their fuel/combat takeoff load.

@jamesevans938 2 жыл бұрын

however unlike most STOVL carriers the queen Elizabeth carrier was designed to have catobar retro fitted if the need arises

@inwedavid6919 2 жыл бұрын

@@jamesevans938 sadly this will never happen as the price of the retrofit is too expensive.

@simonpinkerton4905 2 жыл бұрын

Or alternatively, the steam/electro catapult puts such an enormous strain on the fighter jets airframe, that the US carriers need to be so big that they need to carry a huge inventory of spare parts. After a typical 8 month deployment, on average only a third of those fighters are able to be flown. The US Gov't doesn't tell you that, but as an engineer, I will.....

@jamesevans938 2 жыл бұрын

@@inwedavid6919 I know plus we don’t have any aircraft capable of catobar carrier operations the only way I see it happening is during a war so US navy aircraft have more options as to where they can land and take off from or if something catastrophic happens such as if America loses most of their carriers. But I’m sure the reason behind why they designed the class to be retrofitted with catobar is because good to have that option available in case it’s ever needed

@eagle_rb_mmoomin_418 2 жыл бұрын

STOVL increases the fuel/combat load back up from STOBAR 🤦. The lift to get off the carrier is generated by the ramp and the lift fan. The F35B off QE is comparable to an F18E/F without range extending tanks in range and fuel. The landing procedure in the QE doesn't require extra fuel for bolters. The SRVL landing mode is the reverse of the take off to increase fuel and bring back.

@nowar6697 2 жыл бұрын

very informative

@carlocalo3364 2 жыл бұрын

Italians carriers now have F-35B onboard.

@spicetrade8839 2 жыл бұрын

Solo la Cavour o anche la Garibaldi?

@carlocalo3364 2 жыл бұрын

@@spicetrade8839 solo la 550 Cavour, poi non lo so se ci sono anche sulla Garibaldi.

@joey_ramone_96 2 жыл бұрын

@@spicetrade8839 si utilizza "il" per le navi della Marina Militare Italiana

@stephenparallox 2 жыл бұрын

If there is anything I have learned from Italian history... you don't f#ck with Garibaldi.

@kabouterwesley83 Жыл бұрын

Isn't garibaldi being decomissioned as soon as the new ship trieste is in service?

@ryangiesbers 2 жыл бұрын

The absolute power and superiority of the US Navy is insane.

@johnhoward4397 2 жыл бұрын

If you consider marines LHD with Harrier II plus like Spain, 8 more. The most powerful navy and very far of the others. But there are many tactic and solutions applied for example by navantia in LHD juan Carlos primero as multipurpose ship that americans and marines learnt for apply too.

@johnhoward4397 2 жыл бұрын

Marines working with Spanish LHD learning operations and tactics with multipurpose misions kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gJ-Uiql43sqVZ6M.html

@JInfinity7 Жыл бұрын

Yup...I don't get free healthcare bc of those carriers. ...edit: relax, it wasn't literal commentary. I'm well aware its more complicated.

@rkfan101 Жыл бұрын

And the undersea navy is nuts too

@kd8opi Жыл бұрын

@@JInfinity7 you don’t get free healthcare for a lot of reasons.

@randomwalk5095 2 жыл бұрын

4:30 please correct it now Nave Cavour C 550 is updated to carry F-35 15 are expected to be on in early future

@ramonsanchez6903 Жыл бұрын

Great video and research review

@bobboberson2024 2 жыл бұрын

Love you, Kimkim!!!

@sergiom9958 2 жыл бұрын

The LHD 1 "Juan Carlos 1" has three sister ships (all of them made in Spain). One made for Turkey (the TCG Anadolu) and two made for Australia (the ALHD Adelaida and ALHD Canberra).

@Datsnice97 2 жыл бұрын

The two Australian ones actually use the prefix HMAS instead of ALHD

@yakamoooo 2 жыл бұрын

Navantia Company is the one builds those ships..and as I know, LHDs are not technically "aircraft carrier" even though they are carrying aircrafts.. maybe this list based on "the ships that planes land and take off".. because HAMS Canberra and HAMS Adelaide and TCG Anadolu has the same point that they are not suitable for fighters or bombers to land and take off..

@jiukam 2 жыл бұрын

Anadolu is Juan Carlos's sister thats true but a little different and Turkey building her in its own docks.

@jiukam 2 жыл бұрын

Btw greetings to dear Spanish friends from Turkey!

@Scorpanian Жыл бұрын

@@yakamoooo They are built for planes such as harriers and f-35's, the ramp is retained on the Australian ones, no doubt to facilitate possible use by British and American aircraft.

@CS-np2oo 2 жыл бұрын

If you've never seen a US carrier in person...these pictures do them no justice. They are HUGE and a sight to behold. Saw one in San Diego when visiting and caught it in Port by chance. You'll NEVER forget seeing one in person.

@justpat1420 2 жыл бұрын

i wish i could see one of these giant ships and the USS Missouri in a fleet, a endless dream to see these 2 Super ships on open waters.

@logawinner 2 жыл бұрын

Yes

@Krucifus Жыл бұрын

They're basically floating cities with a population of 5500+ including the airwings when out on deployment.

@sachahector5674 9 ай бұрын

I can only imagine. The Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier looks like a behemoth of a ship when in person, and it is dwarfed by all the other US aircraft carriers.

@kimberlymonte8849 8 ай бұрын

I was on board the USS Midway ( decommissioned and turned into a museum), saw the Carl Vincent when it was in dock during the same trip, 2000’s. Also saw the Enterprise in doc during the early 1980’s. They are indeed huge ships!

@FlashPointHx Жыл бұрын

The Italian one looks like a WW2 era ship. Its also cappuccino colored - so adorable!!

@SamuBlackeart 2 жыл бұрын

Juan Carlos One. You killed me !!

@sergiom9958 2 жыл бұрын

Spain made the HTMS Chakri Naruebet and also her sister ship (the original) ship, the aircraft "Príncipe de Asturias" (Prince of Asturias). Unfortunately, because the obvious lack of apreciation from the spanish political class and average Joe / Jose; the ship was desmantelated for lack of founds when it could had been stored for better times. The dumb ass policiticians considered that the money they could get from the scrap metal was worth the loss of it (and they sold it when the metal price was at its lowest).

@dcanmore 2 жыл бұрын

too small and out of date, if the Príncipe de Asturias was still in service it would be 40 years old and a useless relic. Juan Carlos I is the replacement and much better ship able to use the F-35.

@ernstschmidt4725 2 жыл бұрын

why spain needs a carrier anyways isn't like they still have colonies to take care of.

@johnhoward4397 2 жыл бұрын

@@ernstschmidt4725 Because Spain have Canary Islands, African Cities Ceuta, and Melilla, and Chafarinas Islands. The S80 Submarines can operate Tomahawks misils.

@romnix9000 2 жыл бұрын

Really impressive carrier force from the US, happy to be in NATO !

@SpookyFow Жыл бұрын

It's crazy that our Navy has 6-7 more Ford class Aircraft carriers in the queue to be made and launched within the decade.

@NahFam13 Жыл бұрын

Aircraft manufacturer: "How many aircraft carriers do you want?" US: "All of them"

@loodwich 2 жыл бұрын

"HTMS Chakri Naruebet" was made in Spain with the design of the previous Spanish aircraft carrier "Principe de Asturias"

@lexluther3337 Жыл бұрын

Vikramaditya was made in Russia (USSR). As a matter of fact it is soviet carrier "admiral Gorshkov", that was in service since 80-s and then in 2000-s it was modernized and sold to India.

@johncronin7875 Жыл бұрын

Not active…essentially a Royal barge

@edlee8949 2 жыл бұрын

The US is still the No. 1 when it comes to tonnage, numbers, technology, crew experience, and also the jet fighters it carries.

@foxyawayfox8547 2 жыл бұрын

number 1 when it comes to Tonnage but nothing else

@gamewizardks 2 жыл бұрын

@@foxyawayfox8547 LMAO. Wrong. If anyone wants to pick a fight if they think they are better, why haven't they? Yeah, it's called Force Projection. Our mothball fleet of ships is bigger than almost any active Navy, btw.

@derail6996 2 жыл бұрын

@@gamewizardks hell our museum ship fleet is larger than must active navies!!!!

@foxyawayfox8547 2 жыл бұрын

@@gamewizardks most other countries sell or scrap thier unused warships, Why would countries want to go to war with america? theres no gain in it. An Australian and swedish submarines have sunk an american carrier in war games. The technology that america use is also used by many other nations. Yes america has a massive fleet but that doesnt help when faced off with nations that have the best anti ship skills

@foxyawayfox8547 2 жыл бұрын

@@derail6996 most active navies sell or scrap thier unused warships

@b2tall239 2 жыл бұрын

Would the air wings on the Chinese carriers be known as "People's Liberation Army Navy Air Force"?

@emintey 2 жыл бұрын

It's reported that the carrier carries a small battalion of Chinese helicopter borne marines which makes them the "People's Liberation Army Navy Airforce Marines".

@meejinhuang 2 жыл бұрын

That air wing can't carry weapons and take off on the ramp, so its the Democratic People's Liberation Army Navy Air Force only for show air wing.

@hwg5039 2 жыл бұрын

@@meejinhuang The J-15 fighter cannot FULL LOAD its ammunition when taking off, your comment is just stupid

@jerryumfress9030 2 жыл бұрын

@@emintey 😆very true sir

@BlackEpyon 2 жыл бұрын

I can't get over them using the term "People's 'Liberation.'" Given the context, it's a contradiction in terms.

@floralwallpaperenthusiast6631 2 жыл бұрын

I never realized how many carriers the US Navy had! Great video

@davidb3155 2 жыл бұрын

The US navy is the world's largest airforce. The US Airforce is the second largest 😂

@L0rd0fLight1 2 жыл бұрын

@@davidb3155 other way around

@MrKobus-rz4qy 2 жыл бұрын

@@davidb3155 other way around

@davidteer80 2 жыл бұрын

We also have 9 Amphibious Assault Ships which carry F-35B stealth fighters.......

@janus3555 Жыл бұрын

@@davidb3155 Other way around. (Source: I'm a USAF 2W1 on F-16s, F-22s and taught on F-35's for a year)

@georgesmith4509 2 жыл бұрын

You omitted the two aircraft carriers in the RAN HMAS Australia and HMAS Adelaide. They were purchased new from Spain and are similar to the Spanish Juan Carlos class. They are capable of carrying jfs 35 aircraft.

@arjunparameswaran6740 Жыл бұрын

Indian Navy INS Vikrant is the new addition to the list

@destroyerinazuma96 Жыл бұрын

You forgot every kid who launches paper planes.

@larryoneill7432 Жыл бұрын

I served on 3. USS Midway, VF-151. USS Carl Vinson VS-29. USS JFK AIMD.

@Addy46725 Жыл бұрын

I also served on the USS Midway, S-7 Div, USS Carl Vinson, VA-196, and USS Boxer LHD-4, Comm

@trevorlewis847 Жыл бұрын

I served australian army in early 80s,in Qld and Us navy visited every year ,I got a cigarette lighter from a yank sailor and it was the Carl vincon and back then it was a cruiser, unless me memory going,actually writhing this the uss Carl vinscends comes to mind🤔😂

@TheFlyingZulu 2 жыл бұрын

Do you know who has the second most powerful Air Force in the world? The US Navy's aircraft component.

@RogueMenacegaming 2 жыл бұрын

My dad served on the Eisenhower (And George Washington), makes me happy to see them both on this list :D

@Simonb1977 2 жыл бұрын

Oh, I misread your comment. I taught he served under their command.... I made me question, how...

@RogueMenacegaming 2 жыл бұрын

@@Simonb1977 lol

@Ansardianti 2 жыл бұрын

@@Simonb1977 lmao mans a time traveller

@stephenodell9688 2 жыл бұрын

i was on the Ike pre-commissioning crew and nine years later she was the last ship I was on, also Nimitz.

@typehyuga607 2 жыл бұрын

I am currently on the ship

@ExMachina70 Жыл бұрын

In 1942 Japan had four fleet carriers. The US was nice enough to decommission them.

@PSY2.0848 2 жыл бұрын

Go Buzzz go

@kristianmolloy8622 2 жыл бұрын

they should also mention that russian Carriers come with a Tug on top of there aircraft complement just in case

@opieg7333 2 жыл бұрын

More of an aircraft barge, than carrier.

@fallenicarus2685 2 жыл бұрын

If you consider the amount of light carriers the US has. And the old carriers that are museums now (can be reserviced) the US has almost 25-carriers

@DarrenMalin Жыл бұрын

almost 25 O.O ? 1/2 a ship is sunk 😄

@devinheiner5692 2 жыл бұрын

Fantastic. We'll continue to our secure nation & it's allies. 100%.

@aryanyadav3690 2 жыл бұрын

*INS Vikrant* soon gonna join the list within just 2 months 🇮🇳 Now in Sea Trails 😘

@frankmueller6522 2 жыл бұрын

Go forward, America and India! Long live the Nato and its allies! Long live freedom! Down with all dictatorships and terrorists all around the world! Best wishes from Germany!

@tforaodg 2 жыл бұрын

@@frankmueller6522 😆

@Mr.someone777 2 жыл бұрын

@@tforaodg why are you laughing

@thelitsquad2718 2 жыл бұрын

@@tforaodg It's not like Russia or China using crappy Russian carriers could ever hope to compete

@jayscott8583 2 жыл бұрын

@@thelitsquad2718 unless they produce better steel then what they export it will rust and sink in 3 years

@fernandomirandilla9088 2 жыл бұрын

WOW, now that's a lot of US aircraft carrier.

@lisaroberts8556 2 жыл бұрын

Imagine there use to be even more of them in the early 90’s. At times during the Cold War. 20 US Carriers use to roam the Sea Lanes around the World.

@jonathanbair523 2 жыл бұрын

And we got a few more smaller carriers that can launch a full marine unit that has its own battle group from ship to land...

@ChandranPrema123 2 жыл бұрын

Wasn't INS Vikramaditya an Ex-Russian Carrier that's what I've heard

@Chickenworm9394 2 жыл бұрын

It was a modified Russian ex-Kiev Class aircraft carrier

@SUNNYSTARSCOUT365 2 жыл бұрын

Nó vốn là một tàu tuần dương hạm mang máy bay được sửa đổi lại của Liên Xô.

@littleregrets8810 2 жыл бұрын

Yes it was... it has served us well

@anguswaterhouse9255 2 жыл бұрын

same with the indian nuclear subs but not for long they're jacking up their defence because of a certain northern nieghbor

@theindianagenda5819 2 жыл бұрын

The Indian INS Vikramaditya is so heavily modified you'll hardly recognise that it was originally the Baku. THe Baku was a hybrid carrier which carried not only aircraft but a whole lot of anti-ship and anti-surface missiles as the Russians intended it to be able to operate solo as they could not build so many carriers plus the escort ships to protect them to be able to challenge American aircraft carrier numbers. The Baku had a smaller flight deck because of this and it operated VSTOL aircraft that can land and take off vertically like the Queen Elizabeth does. THe Indian NAvy wanted a full blown aircraft carrier and because of the lesser number of carriers needed could have proper escort ships for each carrier so the missiles and guns were removed from the Baku and that whole front section was also made part of the flight deck and a take off ramp was added so that aircraft may take off more easily. So now the Indian NAvy uses normal non vertical take off planes off of what is now a much more conventional carrier. As a matter of fact, the Indian NAvy has been operating carriers since way before the SOviets. India has been operating carriers since 1961, way before the Soviets or Chinese had them but we usually just bought foreign carriers and just recently did we build our own carrier called the INS Vikrant which is very similar in size to the VIkramaditya, the ship is currently in sea trials and will join the force soon. THank you to whoever took the time to read that long string of info.

@pyro_097 2 жыл бұрын

this is just art....

@radoslaw715 Жыл бұрын

The speaker is killin me !

@Robert-ex2qp Жыл бұрын

I went to the Intrepid Aircraft Carrier Museum in NYC and after seeing all the dents in the steel plating, paused and thought about what it was like in WW2 on this ship in battle. The living quarters in the decks below were cramped and all steel, gives me a better perspective of what they all endured.

@dumbnewyorker7379 Жыл бұрын

She actually was hit by a kamikaze and nearly sank during ww2. 1 plane nearly did her under

@brentsrx7 2 жыл бұрын

I like how the narrator forgot to mention that the Liaoning is an old Kuznetsov-class carrier... Considering the R's and L's of the matter, Winnie the pooh would not approve.

@violetsther3739 2 жыл бұрын

How is that relevant?

@oliverhoffmann1335 2 жыл бұрын

How many Carriers you want? USA: yes!

@billfulgenzi2287 2 жыл бұрын

It's interesting that the narrative omitted giving the gross tonnage of the US Navy Aircraft Carriers. Also forgot to mention that each carrier comes with a complete strike group designed to settle any dispute. The USNs carrier fleet are all capable of being at sea for and unlimited time. The rest of the worlds Carriers rarely if ever leave port. Now, let's talk about the USNs 10 assault ships...

@Krucifus Жыл бұрын

The carriers cannot stay out for an unlimited amount of time. I'm not sure where you heard that. They need periodic maintenance and rehauling, which is why deployments rarely last over 7-9 months followed by 18 months in the shipyard. They can, however, go very long periods without refueling of the reactors.

@dougmahone Жыл бұрын

@@Krucifus They don't do 18 months in a shipyard after every deployment.

@chrispontius4325 Жыл бұрын

@@Krucifus They CAN stay out indefinitely. They can receive everything out at sea called under way replenishment, which includes fuel(for the planes), food and spare parts. They supply planes to ports to swap out crew and mail. The Carriers have near unlimited fuel because of their reactors. The ships have water distillers for fresh water and has air filtration systems to keep the air clean while the ship is locked down during combat.

@sierp13pl 2 жыл бұрын

Italy: we have an aircraft carrier UK: we have 2 AC USA: you're sweet 😂😂😂

@JuanGarcia-ig4zl 2 жыл бұрын

Dont you mean: USA: your cute 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@Ryu-hx5yy 2 жыл бұрын

Japan operates two aircraft carriers the JS Izumo and JS Kaga Now its technically specified as a multipurpose destroyer but if the other non-aircraft carriers are there, why not these ones.

@Aron-ru5zk Жыл бұрын

They don’t operate with fixed wing aircraft, the list would be twice as long if they included helicopter carriers.

@Ryu-hx5yy Жыл бұрын

@@Aron-ru5zk I guess that is a valid point. But the thing is that this video was titled All Active Aircraft Carriers. (But I guess this video is just a bunch of inconsistencies in general as non-aircraft carriers were present as well.)

@PancakeBoi Жыл бұрын

Because up until recently, under law japan isn’t allowed to have “aircraft carriers” so they just operated what they called “defense helicopters destroyers”

@Auror37 Жыл бұрын

Juan Carlos = giant floating 2x4 design. It's brilliant.

@dbyers3897 Жыл бұрын

This is an inadequate list. There are many other vessels capable of fixed wing VSTOL, tilt-rotor & rotor-wing operations. Starting with the US Navy's LHAs, LPDs & LSDs. They have around 45 large vessels, out of a total fleet of ~500, which are capable of operating multiple aircraft for military purposes. More vessels are always under construction as replacements or to expand capabilities. Many nations have built vessels in recent years which may be modified to operate 5th generation VSTOL aircraft. Japan has four DDH "helicopter destroyers" which are in fact light carriers with full flight decks. F-35 fighters & V-22 tilt-rotors are changing the way naval & marine forces with operate as I write this.

@virgilio6349 2 жыл бұрын

Brasil and Australia: "What if we told you we where once in the list aswell?"

@johnhoward4397 2 жыл бұрын

No planes on board 2021, no Harrier Plus II and Skip Jump platforms only for helicopters.

@llamudos9809 2 жыл бұрын

Prince of Wales and Queen elizabeth can carry 72 aircraft each. So the info on here is way out. It can launch and stow a jet every 2 minutes and complete 100+ sorties /day. Only a US Nuclear ACC can do better.

@Axispaw1 Жыл бұрын

@@jbloun911 actually no. The US carriers can't launch in certain weather, the British ones can ;)

@Axispaw1 Жыл бұрын

@@jbloun911 the US relies on money to be superior. Your forces in general are terrible. You marines are barely marines 😂 The SAS/SBS alone could take out half your forces 😂😂

@jbloun911 Жыл бұрын

@@Axispaw1 I don't speak to our vast subordinates...😂😂😂 Betas. SAS use M4s and buy American night vision that we invented 40 yrs ago that all our forces use. Brits try to copy but can't...😂

@Axispaw1 Жыл бұрын

@@jbloun911 Either way, they'll still knock out half your forces. Anyway, what about the vast majority of everything military related that the yanks copied from the brits? We invented the aircraft carrier and everything that goes along with it. The tank, the machine gun, the list goes on. You wouldn't have the jet engine if it weren't for us and you wouldn't have nuclear bombs without us. You wouldn't have rockets without the Germans. Is there anything you guys actually invented?? It's actually pathetic 😂😂😊

@Axispaw1 Жыл бұрын

@@jbloun911 oh and speaking of pathetic, stop liking your own comments 😂😂😂

@joshuademoraes 2 жыл бұрын

Sea: How many Carries you want uncle Sam? uncle Sam: No problem son.

@SmilingIbis 2 жыл бұрын

We sure do have a lot of aircraft carriers!

@amirardalan1903 2 жыл бұрын

Other Countries: Overcompensating for something USA? USA: Yeah weak allies

@lucadesanctis563 2 жыл бұрын

Weak allies didn't invent friendly fire tho and didn't get their ass beat by few Vietcongs/Muslims

@greyembrey1964 2 жыл бұрын

@@lucadesanctis563 please tell me your not French... The US had to bail France out of Vietnam.

@Aron-ru5zk Жыл бұрын

@@greyembrey1964 and France is the reason the USA exists as a country.

@thomascatty379 Жыл бұрын

@@greyembrey1964 he isn’t French, he’s Italian

@xPhoKingAznx Жыл бұрын

@@lucadesanctis563 As oppose to the "enemy." Global super power Russia is getting smoked by a country the size of Texas. Ukraine doesn't even have jungles.

@taotao98103 2 жыл бұрын

when you introduced the Russian carrier, you showed the Liaoning carrier in the photo, when you introduced the Liaoning carrier, you showed the picture of the Shandong carrier.

@mubbles1066 2 жыл бұрын

You can always tell the Russian carrier by the thick black smoke it’s oil engines use,that’s when it’s not actually being towed by tugs….

@nicholassmith7359 Жыл бұрын

Speak softly and carry a big stick, we don't do well on the speak softly part but damn that is one hell of a stick we got.

@theEVILone0130 Жыл бұрын

As an American I don't like war either. But I'm glad that we can call Canadians our friends.

@pranavtripathi6336 Жыл бұрын

I love how the aircraft carrying capacity maxes out at 90. I guess they figured that's the most number they could fit while retaining the general structure, maneuverability and combat capacity. That is still extremely impressive, being able to deploy 90 fighter aircrafts in the middle of the ocean and engage in anti aircraft and anti ship warfare itself while acting as a command centre for the naval strike group. Absolute badass ship

@jon-unicorn-doxxer Жыл бұрын

prob so that it can still pass the panama and suez canal

@ricksterallain Жыл бұрын

Yup, pretty much it. They need to fit in those cannals.

@rad4579 Жыл бұрын

The plural of aircraft is aircraft. There is no such thing as aircrafts.

@sloopypotato Жыл бұрын

USA ships design got limited by panama canal unlike IJN if they survived till now they probably have twice the size of that

@TheGalahad78 2 жыл бұрын

In fact, the name of the Spanish carrier should be "Juan Carlos the First", not One.

@jimsquire9048 2 жыл бұрын

Hey you forgot the Canadian carri, Oh that's right. As you were. :P

@Titanium2344 2 жыл бұрын

Can you make a video list of modern naval gun

@jaanushiiemae2164 2 жыл бұрын

Kuznetsov is not active since 2018 and will be again functional maybe in 2023. Knowing Russian realities it is more probable it will be decommissioned or sold.

@sputnikalgrim Жыл бұрын

The carrier battle group just might be the most intimidating military flex ever.

@DarrenMalin Жыл бұрын

one nuke and it is all gone.

@tlxatom7004 Жыл бұрын

@@DarrenMalin 1 nuke isnt enough. Even our WWII carriers were able to withstand multiple warheads

@Webi Жыл бұрын

@@tlxatom7004 The carrier could withstand a WWII nuke for sure. A modern nuke? 1 shot kill. Tsar bomba? entire fleet gone.

@odysseusrex5908 Жыл бұрын

@@Webi Tsar Bomba was just a demonstration device. It was not deployable as a weapon. Well, I don't know, it would have made one hell of a land mine.

@Webi Жыл бұрын

@@odysseusrex5908 yeah but that was 60 years ago I would be surprised if something even stronger hasn't been theorised or even made by now.

@jamiematthew4986 Жыл бұрын

America- "Awe. .you got two little carriers. That's cute....."

@rickyvito84 2 жыл бұрын

You forgot the new italian Trieste's class!

@senorelroboto2 2 жыл бұрын

2:25 I thought this was a video about aircraft carriers in service, not aircraft carriers being serviced

@josephwoodard9885 2 жыл бұрын

Burn...

@timopkokko 2 жыл бұрын

To be honest, I was an engineer and would try to enlist if I got fired from my current science and software engineering job. I love those carriers way too much. I know, I would be just one

@timopkokko 2 жыл бұрын

That is so immense infrastructure. There have to be thousands of people just to keep one of those American carriers operating. The Americans can take care of 50. Russians cannot take care of one. Instead, they start killing their own kind, while their total capital production is less than that of the Netherlands. The Russians think they are super-power by killing children. Well, that kind of does not work at all. It will backfire, badly.

@RandalColling 2 жыл бұрын

World forces; "we have air-craft carriers"! US; "hold my beer"

@Popebott34 2 жыл бұрын

Are the stats for the HTMS Chakri Naruebet right? Because everything I read online says a maximum of 20 or less aircraft

@417jumps3 Жыл бұрын

Fun fact - the total flight deck space of all 11 US Super Carriers is over 4x greater than all other operational carriers listed in this video..

@jbloun911 Жыл бұрын

Need more space

@cabriskus4700 Жыл бұрын

And the Ford class carriers are even bigger!

@jesseabrams5054 2 жыл бұрын

The Russian government should turn the admiral Krustchez into a floating smoke house! Literally add water wheels and a house blues band!

@saschawagner5167 2 жыл бұрын

Kuznezov and the Chnease variants are very diferent. while the original ones are not clasifyed as Carriers but Aircraft caring Missle cruisers since teh Montreux convention prohibits CVs from coming in or out of the Turkish controlled black sea acress. They carrie a lage number of very large Anti ship missles while the chinease versions did drop thease missles entirely giving them a very diferent mission profile. Also arguably Anfibius asault ships care no Aircraf carriers while some can operate aircrafts they canot long term suport them. By that Metric some of Japans Helecopter Destroyers are more of a CV since their primary role is aircraft/helecoper opteration.

@M_Ladd Жыл бұрын

US needs more aircraft carriers!

@alexanderzippel8809 Жыл бұрын

I am surprised how many countries possess carriers

@johnholt9399 2 жыл бұрын

They should be rated by displacement not length. QEs are bigger than pretty much anything non US in the world today.

@graveperil2169 Жыл бұрын

sort them by crew size and then the QE's will be on the bottom they are very high tech ships

@FunBobbyMarley Жыл бұрын

There should be a BIG asterix next to the Kuznetzov for a number of reasons, primarily that is has been in dry dock for years and reports are that Ivan has given up trying to repair it.

@nkj3985 4 ай бұрын

Thailand, japan, South Korea,Brazil, Egypt,and Turkeye have Helicopter Carrier not Air craft carriers. Helicopter carriers have a similar appearance to other aircraft carriers but operate only helicopters . But Air craft carriers are those that not only operate helicopters but can also operate fixed-wing aircrafts mainly. They have both on dack short runway and helipads. Runway is equipped with catapults and arresters.

@theutgardianchannel1952 2 жыл бұрын

first half of the video: multiple nations, the other half: next the USS...

@leonardo718 2 жыл бұрын

Italy 1)Cavour 2)2018(Trieste) F35 A- F35 B Out Garibaldi 1985!

@SeveralWeezelsInaTrenchcoat 2 жыл бұрын

Trieste isn't in service yet

@quantomic1106 2 жыл бұрын

How many carriers do you need? USA: "Yes"

@berges104 Жыл бұрын

Practically anything that compares Military ends up being "USA getting out of the chair, looking at NATO and saying Hold My Beer. Stepping up to everyone else and asking which muscle they want flexed."