S .b she could play Bat-Man.

Meryl is op haha

She is actually a lesbian. I've seen the tv series and the old woman had an attraction with another girl in her early days but everyone assumed they were best friends.

Facts

@@justthink7242 Aunt March wasn't a lesbian. Not in the book she wasn't!

I am so sorry to be this person but Important*

@@sparksfly5877 I'm the same annoying English major so I don't mind the correction 😂 Don't know how I missed it

Meyra I’m surprised I picked it up at all! I swear my spelling has gotten worse recently! Along with my memory haha Like what even happened yesterday? I have no idea! It’s great!

Meyra oough

Agree

Lady Bird was a great film ! Kudos to Greta.

Who wouldnt they both have so much innocence and talent omg laura dern and meryl streep as well wtf

just like i did

TBFH

I honestly don't think Lady Bird was that great... it was ok...

I got that reference 😂

Lol I love friends.

YAAAS FRIENDS

Sem Pabion omg😂😂😂 FRIENDS

Sem Pabion 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Haha, nice! ...was hoping someone would post this comment. 👍😁

Friends people where u at? :)

Courtesy of Joey Tribbiani.

5'6" tops

I think it's better for Joey to just read the book about Zelda and The Vicar who sweeps the chimney.

RIGHT?! THIS LOOKS AMAZING!

You forgot Meryl Streep

Wonder when that bichi Hermione Gender would be satisfied with all the money she had from Harry Potter movie series , she is one of worst females of current times , well she sold her self to old fat long ago at age of 13-14 . So she should not spoke about love

@@KW-tx6er Is everything okay at home?

Emma Watson is beautiful but crappy actress

Exactly!!!

But I’m so. So glad she’s not.

Uh no She is too sophisticated to play Jo. She ain't Hermonie anymore.

Sameeee, I was kinda disappointed

Me too

Yeah, at some places but still not evrywhere.

Star Struck Alas and alack, it is true. Perhaps, someday, it will get better everywhere for many more.

Same and the times have changed but some people just stay small minded and the same but there are people who have changed and became wiser .

And women are now more unhappy than ever... Truly progressive

Yes, now you have cats and wine and endless regrets.

Same!! I was disappointed they chose Winona to play Jo and not Meg back in the 90s cause I felt in appearance she was SO Meg. Eldest was supposed to be the prettiest one and not Jo ffs. No offense to the actress that played Meg back then ofc. She was pretty as well. Just the facial characteristics didn't fit at all. But now it seems they got it right. Finally!!!

I think Emma was perfect for Meg as we see that Meg enjoys balls and flounces and pretty things like that I think Emma was perfect because she holds a natural grace as Meg does, an elegance which allows her to fit with Meg

Winona was never a good fit as Jo. She was way too pretty and Feminine for the role.

Katharine Hepburn

Me too!!!! Wino forever

Me too, Winona will always be my Jo.

Same here but I was kind a hoping that Emma Watson was going to be in that role when I saw that she was one of the stars in this movie now that I know she’s Meg I’m not sure if I wanna watch the movie at all

Obsessed Potterhead It's not bad just a bit annoying. Of course Harry Potter wont be forgotten but Emma Watson isn't just Hermione Granger. Emma is a great actress with amazing movies and people should appreciate her acting skills without comparing or mentioning it with Hermione

Gryffindor***

I don't think so! She will always "be" Hermione to me!

same but without the robe Oo

I do lol

100th like

Somebody already put this with thousands of likes sooo

@@mimilils9335 so?

@@sallys2892 hmm

Lmao. Also the person that commented in here? Friends had MILLIONS of fans and still do. You think only one comment is about Joey reading the book?? Internet commentors really take everything so seriously nowadays wtf 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️ Besides I haven't seen the THOUSAND LIKE comment. KZfaq is weird like that. Algorithms and all.

However, remaking it means the story will continue on into a new generation, not everyone can see the play when it's put on, a lot of people (including adults young and old) don't read much, and both the 90s and 40s (and probably others that I don't know of) version is difficult to get or mostly unknown by a wider audience. If this is incredibly successful then the story and the message can continue on. Disney does it to make money mostly, but here I think it's really to keep the story and message alive.

Or maybe todays generation needs these types of stories

No actually we have run out.

@Anon yMous That one was a remake as well, the original was made in 1949, but yeah they need to leave it alone. One remake was enough.

The goal of these movie makers are to make (financially) successful and "popular" movies. To make movies that people want to pay to see (obviously). In order to do this, the potential viewers (arguably) need to care about the movie/topic/actors. If you make a remake then people already care about the film because they liked the original. Unfortunately, new movies are too much of a risk these days. Remember that the primary goal of these creators currently isn't to make a good movies, but rather to make movies that a lot of people will watch. (and probably be disappointed by.) The quality of the film doesn't matter, the advertisement for/of it does...

Louis Garrel, which is kind of a strange option I think....

The "Hellboy" Guy? maybe

According to IMDb it's Louis Garrel, and John Brooke will be played by James Norton.

why not edouard baer xd ?

Idk

It's good marketing though? Most popular (though not most accomplished of the three) catches your eye and make you watch the trailer. It did throw me off though because she's not Jo and Saoirse I thought would be recognizable enough from Lady Bird?

I click the video because I see emma but I am going crazy when I see saoirse ronan

@@hilary3219 Saoirse Ronan and Meryl Streep are both accomplished actresses, though, with a wider variety of roles under their belts.

DigiDestined13 yes that is why I made that point?

Why are you sad about this? She deserves it, and everyone have your moment...

WOWWWW. ANOTHER Little Women?? The last one came out, like, 2 years ago? Oh, I'm sorry--make that ONE year, the one with Sarah Davenport came out LAST YEAR. You know it's totally unbiased of course....despite the fact that it won't come up as a suggested search on Wikipedia....and despite the fact that rotten tomatoes critics gave it a 29% while viewers gave it 76%. I guess they thought no women would be "woke" enough to notice. Hey feminists: the virtuous women cutting in on your territory? Huh? Had to "fix" the movie because--God forbid--people might see the one the Christians made and....get the wrong idea about feminine virtue? Pay attention, ladies: they're trying to manipulate you. Feminazis are the WORST.

I don’t get the point of this reply to your comment lol

@@puregoodevil1084 ya that comment above makes no sense. Its just an insane person ranting

@@horacepthompkin talking about you you illiterate lunatic

@@djm6211 You're the one whose being illiterate here buddy.Its pretty clear what he meant. He starts off commenting about how another film was released last year on this.Hes possibly a fan and doesn't like that it got bad reviews.And he/she thinks the critics were biased against that film.Thats it.Its pretty obvious what he meant. You can disagree with him on this topic that the critics weren't biased or the reason for their bais doesn't make sense in your opinion. But that hardly makes him insane or a lunatic. The only thing insane here is your attitude.

Just on the video title. She's got second billing in the actual trailer.

That's how Hollywood works buddy.

Bigger star. There's another trailer (Goldfinch or something like that) with a kid from Stranger Things as the main billing. He may as well be making a cameo appearance for the trailer.

She’s so trash though

They have released more trailers with other actors shown in the thumbnail and given top billing in the video title, it's to attract more people into watching it. Just search "little women 2019" and see what pops up, it's smart marketing.

anD I *OOP*

literally

vsco girl alert

I like how this went from Harry Potter to VSCO girls

Awesomesauce 659 lmaoooo ya lol XD

Overall, their accents are American. I hear small hints of British accents when Meryl and Emma talk, but they seem to be doing an American accent. The movie is set in the U.S., so yeah.

@@leonsfilmsonig it's set in the 1800s, so their accents were obviously different from modern American accents...older people would have more of a British-sounding accent, as would 'posh' people i guess...it's not that inaccurate.

A.V.D Oh, I didn’t know that. Thanks for clearing that up.

in the books and earlier movie they were british, but i also am confused as emma and meryl sound british whereas the others do not.

@@gm83958 they're from New England in the original book

Saoirse Ronan-lady bird

Watson is the least talented actor is that cast.

Recency bias much?

@@TheRishijoesanu Stop repeated the same meme garbage, she's extremely talented and has shown more actual range in Harry Potter and the bling ring than saorise has playing the same character over and over again

@@crarfraizer9721 That is not what the other guy's talking about. It's clear she's a good actress but she's also the weakest link. I mean they literally casted Meryl Streep!!

Jo

It depends what you mean by "best"! :) She was the gentlest, most sensitive and kindest. I've always been fond of her character.

That's a spoiler right? :'(

Наталья Возняк oh i don't know. I hope not.

@@mienyue9349 oh gotta watch other adaptations, so im not as clueless as im now

Наталья Возняк hehe I recommend you wait for this version first. Maybe we'll have surprise, maybe not.

@@mienyue9349 so i went to Wikipedia, opened "plot". Screw me. Will still watch it

we never do. its so sad that there's no more originality

True. Winona was perfect for Jo

Watson is the least talented actor is that cast.

Only U I totally agree

+Only U I get what you're saying but you don't need any movies, yet they all exist. It isn't about what, you, me or anyone else needs.

Yes, in the original 90s film. And Susan Sarandon was the mom

That wasn’t the original. But.. yes she played Joe

Winona Ryder was Jo and Kirsten Dunst was the youngest (Mary?)

DrinkwithaMexican calm down

@@Malaika924 Amy

Exactly

Honestly it’s a remake of the one on nexfilxs and I like that one better

Emily Shubsall l have to check that one out!

And Meryl Streep will be the absolute perfect Aunt March, just picture her from "The Devil Wears Prada" lol

k

OMG Emma Watson in those old timey outfits. I feel like her dirty panties in those outifts would smell sooo damn good.

Lily Caple That’s not even what the story is about.

@@rupertmurdoch4750 Creep

@@zee3929 Your anti-Trump right? And publicly tell his supporters they shouldn't support him right?

Probably won't be as good as the 1949 version

At least the 1994 version had young girls not almost 30 year old women

@@jeanloux7563 That's true! Although the girl who played twelve-year-old Amy in the 1994 version was pretty young.

@@jeanloux7563 june Allyson was 30 yes...the other 3 were age appropriate. Elizabeth taylor and Janet leigh were in their early 20s. Margaret O'Brien about 12. Plus even in today's movies, people in their 20s would play teenagers.

@@reesesnpieces1 in what modern movie a 12 and a 13 year olds were played by actors twice their age

It's All Okay With CJ!! Omg I was whattt when I saw 1949 but now I realize that you meant 1994😂

@@savannahheard9976 ...there's quite a famous 1949 film of Little Women with Janet Leigh, June Allyson and Elizabeth Taylor. There's also been film adaptations made in 1917, 1918 1933 and 1978.

They had no acting perspective then so they acted with love. That's why these films are so pure.

@@stingraytingvideo how can I get the 1917 one you think? It'll be interesting to watch the pre war vs post war versions.

It's All Okay With CJ!! Didn’t they switch the ages of Amy and Beth in that version?

Is there any movie she doesn't? 😁

Desu Dokuton same! I love that one!!!

Desu Dokuton that’s how I feel about this version and I haven’t even seen it yet haha. I’m scared to watch the 1994 one, I want this to be the first version I see

I wish they just made Little Men with Winona Ryder in it again especially now that she is older! I would love to see her with Dan, Nat and Tommy!

And dunst was a child as amy should be

I feel like I won't watch it either. I just watched the 1994 movie today and it is one of my favorite movies ever....I just don't want to be disappointed 😂

I don't find it distracting, but confusing. Are they all supposed to be british or american or something? Aren't they supposed to be playing siblings?

zhenyilani Yes, they’re supposed to be siblings. And they’re supposed to sound American. 🤷🏻‍♀️

Jessica M. Yes but it’s a period film so keep in mind that wouldn’t necessarily sound like a current American accent

@@ediesongbird3163 but they wouldn't have the accents they have now either. Also what makes it most distracting is all their accents are different from each other.

I think it might also be that Emma Watson is not very good at the American accent. As the trailer progressed I kept hoping that Emma would speak American but alas that was not what happened

Its novel as well with the same name

Two of the actors from Ladybird are in this film. The characters are from the novel Little Women.

@@yosoyconsuela lol that's what I meant, I just worded it wrong

Pumpernickel Jam lol WHAT

Three actors actually. Tracy Letts , who plays Lady Bird's father, is also in this.

@@thetramp123 wow that's really weird

HUH? Mel didn't direct Hamlet. The great director behind 1968's Romeo & Juliet directed Mel's Hamlet. And I think Mel was WONDERFUL as the title character.

What traditionalists are hating on this version of Little Women?

TheFlair4thedramatic It’s too bad the costumes aren’t all too accurate tbh

Your Lungs 😂😂😂 he makes you laugh so hard...😂😂😂

🤮

Dont worry, he prefers dick

Christian Bale was a great Laurie.

honestly tho

Lulu R my thoughts exactly

Well there still original ideas like the next phase of marvel films

Art Fun with Blake Lane - ha ha very funny wise guy

Lulu R my mistake

Yeah they acted like she's not a big actor. Ffs she has way more start power than anyone in the movie

Earthly Fireflies, get a life mate.

@Earthly Fireflies *eye roll* Your repeated posts here of the very same comment would seem to indicate that you actually don't have a life.

@@serenevil so much hate ? Why? Has your mum stopped feeding you.. spread love ♥️

There was one in 1933 with Katharine Hepburn as Jo that is my favorite~!

keithrichardsgirl That's right!! Absolutely gorgeous!

Elizabeth Taylor was in that. Yes I loved that film.

Yeah, it just feels like they are setting themselves up for failure.

Yess

SHES CALLED JO sorry I'm obsessed and I've only been reading this today and I'm like halfway through it

Well she got Oscar nominated for it at least :)

Love Winona but Katharine Hepburn in 1933 was the best!

Exactly

just me you should watch the Elizabeth Taylor version that one is my favorite

"Loved the old version"?... You have no idea how many versions of this story there's been since 1917. If you include the TV adaptations, it's double figures.

@@Ddog666 when i mentioned "Loved the old version". I meant by one of the many older versions of little women. My point is that i don't have the need to watch this one because i believe i've already seen the best version of it. N from my point of view, i just think no one couldn't play a better Jo than Winona.... . The trailer, cast for this 2019 version looks amazing ngl.... But i'm not too eager in watching this... i don't see a point watching this when i believe the best is from the older versions of little women...everyone has their own preferences.. so there.

Katharine Hepburn was a great Jo

The old one is actually with Katherine Hepburn to be more accurate. Its understandable if its confusing, they've remade this movie so many times!!! I swear every ten years or less!!!

Lady Pinkymoe heck yeah! The 1994 little women with Winona and Christian is way better!

Not to mention the 2nd movie,3rd movie ,4th movie, 1st tv show,2nd tv show and cartoon.

Thank you I was thinking the same thing - I read the novel and this simply does not convey the sense I got at all - another feminist rewrite. I am so bored with feminism

@@hannahdavia8791 thank God I am not the only one sick and tired of all this feminism. We are not all like that!

@@francescasole7300 thank you! Thank goodness I'm not the only one. I half expected a feminist attack. I grew up and spent most of my life feminist. I hereby formally renounce it! (and I embrace authentic femininity!)

@@francescasole7300 yes we are not like that at all now,may be in that time period...... But not all were, Joe was different ...... She was a dude 😎

@@hannahdavia8791 I was thinking the same thing. Where, in the novel, speaks Jo about women's rights? It's just another butchering of a great classic that serves for the creator's political agenda and preaching of how we have to think. God forbid we don't believe every woman or we think men (sometimes) have it harder than women.

Christos Psihogios no, it really doesn’t.

@@DivinityFallen Well our opinions are different then. I personally love Greta's take on it and this cast looks insane.

Thank you, I agree - a feminist revision - Loiusa would turn in her grave

What is the "point" of the book?? I am honestly curious, because I intend to read it and I should know what to look for.

@@hannahdavia8791 what is the "point of the book"?

bet you didn't actually watch the movie lol

thanks for the suggestion! i’ll check that adaptation out.

C'mon Timothée looks pretty good😄❤❤

He was brilliant, and will always be our Teddy.

@Ice 77 I don't think so, I mean, when I read the book, I thought in Laurie having a soft face, with delicate factions. Timothée is just perfect!

True! I can only imagine Christian Bale as Laurie! Maybe because I watched this in the late 90's as a kid. He and Wynona looked amazing together and Laurie was feminine yet bit masculine as well. Timothee is my favourite as well but he's not Bale..he still looks bit more feminine. But well..at least he also has great chemistry with this Jo (Saoirse Ronan). But nah..Bale would always be Laurie.

No...peter lawford

You won't find originality here now, It's hollywood. All originality is now in Independent low budget film-making.

It's not like movies were original back in the day either. Little Women was adapted 4 times before 1950.

Hey, A new little Little Women adaptation is alright in comparison to the overflux of Disney remakes. If it's a literature classic, it needs revival once in a while.

@@mermaidscooter no, but in proportion to previous decades had a lot more originality. Today, the biggest movies releasing are all remakes, sequels, or movies based on historical events or books (though I dont criticize that necessarily).

@@triplea7536 Idk. I think there are just more movies released per year than there were before so it may seem that way, but I grew up watching old movies and A LOT of them were based on books, plays, historical events etc. There were plenty of sequels and serials as well. One of my favourite comedies of all time, The Thin Man (1934), was based on a novel by Dashiell Hammett and is the first in a series of six 'Thin Man' films.

Hahaha first thing I thought of was how sad this movie is.

We didn't need a remake of it in the 90s either, but it was made nonetheless and many people loved it and grew up with it. That same thing can happen with this Greta Gerwig adaptation as well.

@@thetramp123 the 90's movie was a remake

@@annekeo.1706 That's what they said in their very first line.

Lonell Fletcher a tv miniseries, otherwise it’s been 25 years

Joshua Howard I’m speaking of the updated 21st century film released last year with Lea Thompson.

@@lonellfletcher Who the hell watched that except you bro?

Kourosh Rm7 I didn’t watch it. It got made, that’s my point. I mean how many versions exist? How many different ways can you tell the same story? Oh, Hollywood. Do better.

@@lonellfletcher Hollywood is a business. They like to re-do winners and create sequels. Look at how many Rocky movies there are. Look at the number of A Star is Born movies get made. They like to make money.

Flare} Gemma} Midnight} where (?)

She's a muggle though

@@Harry-rh9qc I know she's a muggle born witch