Even worse, the bad things come to you, and getting rid of them is tough.

in China you have freedom of speech, you won't end up in jail if you say something wrong. Social media platforms will delete your comments.

@@leeway777 If you attract bad or negative things it can happen in China too

😂😂😂

@@amberp.4517 🤔

And if someone has a knife like those four American teachers came across they cannot defend themselves

Gun deaths are considered an epidemic in the United States (which leads the world in civilian gun ownership) by many people, particularly those on the left side of the political spectrum. In 2022, there were 45,222 gun deaths in the United States, which per capita is significantly higher than in other industrialized countries. By 2023, 43,163 people died in the United States from gun related injuries. Between 2010 and 2020, gun-related deaths rose by roughly 43%. Every day, on average, at least 327 people are shot across the US, including roughly 23 children and adolescents under the age of 17.

Thousands of young children were killed by guns in school every year , others on the streets. You don't want your family and loved ones to fall victims of gun-related deaths. So tell me, which is more lethal? Guns or knives??

@@Red_United combine that with hammer attacks, machetes, swords, many less lethal objects that you can get from your house are very deadly and are utilized. People use cars to intentionally run over people You can run over 8 to 12 people at one time in the matter of seconds. So should there be no cars, should we remove knives from everybody's house? Your argument is stupid

@@Red_United I lived in Chicago for 30 years. Never once had I seen a gun, heard of anyone use a gun, none of my friends or family have ever been a victim by a gun. You are misled. It is a very small fragment of the population here that is affected less than .01% but people like this video and the media wants to make it seem like they're shootings everywhere every moment all day long. And that is total bullshit

In the USA, if you support Palestine, you will be arrested by the police. Look at their college students!! But in China, it doesn’t matter which side you support.

Say what

you are right.

People should be held accountable for the misinformation spread on social media. Every country has its own laws against this kind of behavior but many people forget this.

@@ramonkroutz say the fact not say fake thing to mislead people.

​@@Gamerzombiepro1You have to understand that China is a country with 1.4 billion people. Is it interesting to compare two mini countries?

​@@Gamerzombiepro1 correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Sweden the r*pe capital of Europe ?

​@@Gamerzombiepro1 correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Sweden the R*** capital of Europe?

​@@Gamerzombiepro1 actually Sweden is the **** capital of Europe.

So much censorship here, can't write anything about Sweden....

Moms are profound by default.

There's a fine line between freedom and chaos. The West is clearly in chaos.

Freedom always under frame of laws, rules,mainstream public opinion and moral requirements Even primitive people can not do anything they want without considering naturel conditions

There is no freedom and democracy in western countries, it's an illusion

Well put!

Chiina is Not safe anymore.

FYI. Here is a timeline of India's annexation of South Tibet to become today's Arunachal Pradesh. 1912: In the first full year of the Republic of China after the fall of the Qing dynasty, the United States National Geographic Magazine dedicated an issue to China. Accompanying the issue is a large and detailed fold-out map of China. The map clearly shows that Dirang Dzong (德讓宗) and Tawang (達旺) are within the boundary of China. 1943: British India likely calculated that dealing with the Lhasa government was easier than with the Republic of China's Nationalist Government in extracting land concessions and proposed to the United States to recognize Tibet's right to exchange diplomatic representatives with other powers. The Americans rejected this proposal: "The Government of the United States has borne in mind the fact that the Chinese Government has long claimed suzerainty over Tibet and that the Chinese constitution lists Tibet among areas constituting the territory of the Republic of China. This Government has at no time raised a question regarding either of those claims." 1944: British India annexed Dirang Dzong (德讓宗), a Tibetan-settled area. Dzong means fort in Tibetan. The Chinese Government (the Nationalist Government of the Republic of China, seated in Kunming at the time because of World War II) protested to the British. So did the Tibetan Lhasa government. 1945: British India intruded into the tribal area of South Tibet. February 1947: The Chinese Nationalist Government lodged a complaint with the Indian mission, which was by then newly established in China, on British India's border intrusions into Chinese territory. August 1947: Britain left South Asia, and India was created as the successor polity to the departed British. India's creation means that a country that historically did not exist suddenly appears on China's doorstep. October 1947: The Tibetan Lhasa Government dispatched a formal request to New Delhi, asking the newly independent Indian Government to withdraw all its predecessors' intrusions into the territory between the McMahon Line and the traditional border beneath the foothills and return a wide swath of territory from Ladakh to Assam, including Sikkim and the Darjeeling district. 1949: When the defeat of the Nationalist Government in China's civil war was imminent, the Republic of China's ambassador in New Delhi reminded the Indian Government that China did not recognize the McMahon Line and held the Simla Convention invalid. October 1949: The CCP (Chinese Communist Party) took control of the mainland, and its civil war rival, the Republic of China, retreated to Taiwan. December 1949: India recognized the People's Republic of China as the legitimate government, effectively cutting off the diplomatic channel the Republic of China used to deliver its protests to India. February 1951: India annexed Tawang (達旺), the birthplace of the Sixth Dalai Lama and home to the four-hundred-year-old Tawang Monastery. The Tibetan authorities in Lhasa protested but were simply informed by the Indian political officer that India was taking over Tawang. The Tibetans protested again, accusing the Indian Government of 'seizing as its own what did not belong to it.' The Tibetans went on to ask New Delhi to withdraw its forces from Tawang immediately. The protests were ignored. The Republic of China (which had already retreated to Taiwan by then and had no diplomatic relation with India) also vehemently denounced India's territorial travesty. Curiously the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) made no noise. 1954: India published a new map showing South Tibet as part of India. The map also shows the two neighbors of China, Sikkim and Bhutan, as part of India. Sikkim has been a neighbor of China for many hundreds of years and has enjoyed good relations. In the 18th century, Sikkim was briefly overrun by the Nepalese Gorkhas, and the Sikkim king fled to China seeking help. The then Qianlong emperor dispatched an expedition to Sikkim, expelled the Gorkhas, and restored Sikkim's sovereignty and independence. Sikkim remained unmolested for the rest of its history until it was annexed by India in 1975. Bhutan is another neighbor of China, and their proximity is evident simply by comparing the flags of Bhutan and the Qing dynasty of China. January 1959: The CCP (Chinese Communist Party) commented for the first time on the issue of South Tibet when Zhou Enlai, in a letter to Nehru, offered to concede South Tibet to India. However, India rejected the offer, as it also claims Aksai Chin as part of India. Aksai Chin is located in an area that is very hard to access from the Indian side due to difficult terrain. This is evidenced by the fact that China was able to build a road there over two years without India even noticing, and India only became aware of it when reading an article from China describing the construction project. This clearly indicates that India not only has no control over the area but also lacks visual access to the region. 1960: India started establishing posts (border markers) north of South Tibet (north of the McMahon Line) and proclaiming that it has the right to unilaterally 'improve' the McMahon Line as it sees fit. October 1962: After years of warning, China attacked India's position in South Tibet and recovered Tawang shortly. Three weeks later, in a second wave, China recovered the whole of South Tibet. November 1962: China unilaterally withdrew back to the north of the McMahon line. 1975: India annexed Sikkim. 1987: India made South Tibet a state and renamed it the so-called Arunachal Pradesh. The Republic of China (Taiwan) put out a statement denouncing India. Here is the statement: "In regard to the issue of the Indian government's illegal occupation of our country's territory and the establishment of the so-called 'Arunachal Pradesh,' the foreign ministry of the Republic of China issued the following announcement at midnight: India's illegal occupation of our country's territory has been repeatedly stated by the Government of the Republic of China as something it will not recognize. Recently, the Indian Congress unilaterally passed the establishment of 'Arunachal Pradesh' to the south of the so-called McMahon Line. The Indian Government also made it a state. The Government of the Republic of China once again solemnly proclaims that the Government of India intends to legitimize its illegal occupation of Chinese territory. The Government of the Republic of China regards this as illegal, void, and absolutely not recognized." 2008: With the return of Hong Kong to China, Britain effectively withdrew from its colonial involvement in Asia, and Tibet lost its utility as a potential bargaining chip in British negotiations with China concerning Hong Kong. With no remaining interests in Tibet, Britain could afford to be forthright for once. The British government issued a statement acknowledging China's sovereignty over Tibet (previously recognized as suzerainty, not sovereignty). This statement, endorsed by both the Conservative and Labour parties, is notable for its candor in admitting Britain's past territorial ambitions in Tibet and adopts an almost apologetic tone. Here is an excerpt: "...But our position is unusual for one reason of history that has been imported into the present: the anachronism of our formal position on whether Tibet is part of China, and whether in fact we harbour continued designs to see the break-up of China. We do not.​​ Our ability to get our points across has sometimes been clouded by the position the UK took at the start of the 20th century on the status of Tibet, a position based on the geopolitics of the time. Our recognition of China's "special position" in Tibet developed from the outdated concept of suzerainty. Some have used this to cast doubt on the aims we are pursuing and to claim that we are denying Chinese sovereignty over a large part of its own territory. We have made clear to the Chinese Government, and publicly, that we do not support Tibetan independence. Like every other EU member state, and the United States, we regard Tibet as part of the People's Republic of China. "​​ 2014: A Tibetan Chinese named Nido Tania from Arunachal Pradesh (occupied South Tibet) went to Delhi and was beaten to death because he 'looked Chinese.' 2024: In the 1990s, India subtly probed the People's Republic of China (PRC), leading to the inference that China's position on South Tibet had hardened, despite the PRC officially maintaining ambiguity on the matter. It has become evident that China's earlier offer to cede South Tibet is no longer available, as China has explicitly stated that South Tibet is part of its territory. This stance mirrors the positions of both the Tibetan Lhasa Government and its civil war rival, the Republic of China (Taiwan).

Because most Chinese people don't care about politics.

I live in the USA and I walk at midnight and I never have to worry. This is fear-mongering propaganda opinion piece. It depends where you live in the USA

@@joshw7812 They walked in downtown city area. You should try doing the same, downtown, film it and post it.

@@blackknight4996 I was just downtown Chicago last weekend at 10:00 p.m. . Zero issues except for a few people who had a little too much to drink and were loud in the street. No physical violence no issues. Why do people like you want to keep pushing this bullshit propaganda

Facts don't care about feelings and fears.

@@blackknight4996 kzfaq.infoFbK47b4fZE0?si=-PiObLyryColPNbu

Be careful that your wallet is emptied, because you can't stop eating.🤣

Wise choice. I live in the west and the public safety is getting worse and worse. I plan to move to China🇨🇳 such a nice, advanced, safe country.

@@DareDevilMinecraft Remember to keep exercising. Otherwise you'll be a fat man

Not exactly, we have KONGFU culture also. Rugby is not popular, but boxing and MMA is getting more popular.

​@@Gamerzombiepro1An Arab country where women have no human rights?

​@@Gamerzombiepro1An Arab country where women have no human rights?

​@@Gamerzombiepro1You actually compare it to an Arab country? Do women in Arab countries have human rights?

​@@Gamerzombiepro1You can go there, if you want..

@@DDDrumpf kk

yup the best in faking products!

And the best at closing banks and having people lose their money

@@joshw7812 例如硅谷银行

​@@user-ux8jv6hs2nhahaha.. hahaha.. hahaha.. Yes, sure. But, you keep buying.... Hahaha.. hahaha.. hahaha..

​@@joshw7812hahaha.. hahaha.. hahaha.. People lose money?? Well, you are lied to, old kidd!! People's deposits are protected, just like anywhere in the world!! If what you say is true, then, no people stupid enough to put their money in the banks, no, old kidd?? Hahaha.. hahaha.. hahaha..

😂

The Truth.

没这么夸张吧？

German cities are also safe, though not as safe as China.

I live in the suburbs in the USA and I can walk at midnight safely and not have to worry. You have a scared mindset

@@joshw7812 highly depends on where u live. but in china in most places u are safe

@@joshw7812 because you walk with your gangsters and M16s with you

@@joshw7812 There is not much side walk for you to walk on in the suburb of US... stop lying. Usually long distance between point A and B, not walkable at all.