You really explained this in the most simple way. Thank you so much You literally saved me I have my micro exam in 2 days. Thanks again

Thanks, you explained it the most simple and quickest!

Big thumbs up man. Everything that was needed is in this video. Clear and simple explanation. Thanks!

awesome explanation. short, simple, and informative!

Very easy to understand with your graph and explanation.

Very very helpful thank you! Simple and straight to the point.

Thanks, informative and thanks for drawing the examples. They really help to visualize

So easy - Thanks you helped so much :)

thanks bro you explaine it so simply than my book .

Thanks, very helpful!

This is really good.:) feeling a bit more confident about this section... beeeeeg thanx

thank youuu. This is v helpful

clear and nice explanation

really helpful, thanks!

Thank you, sir!

thanks very much.

Tq it's very helpful😊😊😊

Thank you!

Thank you very much

short and superb

Hi! Does this mean that the long-run average cost curve will always be equal to or lower than your short-run average cost curve for any given combination of labor and capital? And to ease diseconomies of scale i will just have to decrease production? :)

You should probably explain that short run average costs only intersect with long run during times when capital is frozen and changes in labor are made only. By definition, a SRATC is when capitol is frozen and labor is not. And LRATC is when neither capital or labor is frozen. So, by freezing capitol at any given point, we could have a specific SRATC and that cost curve would intersect with the LRATC (assuming that the capital would be unfrozen later on).

omg!!! thank you!!!!!

thank u~~!

thank you

OOOOOOHHHH I get it now.

Thanks

You just saved me

Thank u sir

thank u

Are economy of scale and returns to scale the same thing

perfecttt ;)

tysm ✌😘

Thank you 🤧😭

Thanks so much for this lol, just saved my grade 😂

please give a substitle. so everyone easy to understand your explanation

Gud explain sir.......👍tq

🤗👍

so is this why LRATC is u shaped

Hey it will be mc curve not tc

true, true, but once I take the exam is presented in a totally diff. way and i fail it.

Not true. You are mixing the concepts of economies of scale and Returns to Scale. The equivalence between both only applies when inputs are used in a constant proportion. You've used the definition of increasing returns to scale to refer to Economics of scale (idem for Diseconomies of Scale) BUT this need not be true. When LRATC reaches its minimum there are neither economies of scale nor diseconomies of scale BUT you can't say there are constant returns to scale because that might not be the case. Just consider a firm with constant returns to scale (a doubling of inputs leads to a doubling of output) which experiences an improvement in its technology process. In the meantime (while switching its technology towards the use of more sophisticated machines for instance) the firm might be able to reduce its average costs and thus experience both Constant returns to Scale and Economies of Scale (output can be doubled for less than a doubling of costs). They are not mutually exclusive because input proportions can be INDEED variable.

Really disgusting!

An add came before your video that was profanity ridden. Just to let you know.

thank you

Thanks