I hope that increasing hunting accident chance is a joke to show that this trait is very good

it'd be very funny if they decided to change the name of the game

I think the expert scholar stands for Saint Stephen of Perm (1340-1396) a Russian Orthodox bishop and missionary, who converted the perm area and created an alphabet for the people living there, and beacame the first bishop of Perm

Also, sending characters into convents might not be just about making them "disappear". It could be a tool to put someone of your dinasty in the Papacy.

In Hungary the fleeing Cumans got settled down in the middle of Hungarian Kingdom (together with some Jasz people), they got completely assimilated, but we still have many names of towns, villages which have the name Kun (Cuman) or Jász in it as a reminder they were living in those regions in bigger numbers. Fun fact in Hungary the last man who still knew the Cuman language died in 1750 and the Cuman language also influenced Hungarian so we use some words of Cuman origin.

Johan is pulling a Thanos and collecting the best features from all the other Paradox games like infinity stones

Watch it be Crusader kings IV instead of Europa universalis V 💀

"the expert scholar" and "the mighty knight" could be some dynamic titles based on government. like highest ranking knight is the ruling house because it is no dynasty. An example is "ahi's" in anatolia. they are not quite a republic, but there is no real dynasty like osmanoglu house either.

I want an achievement called "Best-Arab": as a Basarab dynasty ruler, form the country of Arabia.

My laptop just shit its whole self.

Today is the first day of 7 days of exams i have to take. (Sorta like GCSE). The result will determine which university i go to. I wanna go to med school, pray for me people, wish me luck

"La crème de la crème" J'adore, c'est très bien utiliser; rire et surprise. Approuvé 😀

I think that keeping track of where they are born and where they are living is important in the case a country conquers his home location. He would be elegible to become part of the other country, in that case. This makes me think: What if France does not own Corsica during the age of revolutions? Would we see the rise of Napoleon Bonaparte in, Italy or Spain, instead of in France?

The attention they pay to the details amazes me for real. You can see the blank spot in the center of Anatolia, right next to the Ottomans. The state present there is Ahiler, as we know from previous Tinto maps. This state is not a beylik like other Turkish states in Anatolia. Ahiler was an organization which is based on Bektaşi sect of Islam. They sped up the process of Islamization of the Anatolian peninsula. They consisted of primarily artisans of Alawite-Bektaşi Turcoman origins and they had a republic for a brief period of time around Ankara, the capital of modern Turkey. The fact that they knew and implemented this on their game makes me definitely more hyped about EU5. I think and hope that some kind of merchant-artisan republic right next to the Ottomans and Byzantine will bring a great flavor to the upcoming game.

Kinda excited to play the house of Piast, and have a possibility to keep the throne of Poland

Historically, de Valois, Burgundy, Anjou-Naples are houses of one dynasty : Capet. The Aviz (Portugal) are Capetian too

im liking the UI's look

Great video as always!!

Thanks for the video and your time and work covering all the info about project Caesar!! I have the feeling that this EU5 will be something between EU3 and Victoria2. And I love the way it sounds!! Also it explains why Vicky 3 is so different to Vicky 2. Something like... EU5 more oriented to trade, politcs and conquest and Vicky 3 more society related.

Portugal starts with "de Borgonha". This means in a couple of years from the start of the game, there should be a sucession crysis: João de Aviz vs João de Castela This means Portugal should have a really badass General at that time: D. Nuno Álvares Pereira And should have a very dificult battle for independence. Playing as Castela should have an event to claim Portugal during that crysis.

If i am not mistaken, the 2 Burgundy dinasty's are different. (Forget it, Portugal has a junior branch of the burgundy dinasty, i've searched.)

9:24 I think it was a priest in like the 1400's who just wrote a list of Swedish monarchs, starting literally thousands of years ago with Oden and through like "Bogusking XXVII" until he reached actual historical people in around 980. Dude was like the OG "My source is that I made it the f up". Basically he thought it was embarassing to not have a cool history so he made it up. I think this list is somewhat related to the fact that the first king named Karl (Charles) was the 9th as there were eight fakes before him lol, we're currently on the 16th Carl and half of them totally lived at the same time as the Pyramids were built and definitely ruled half the world, trust me bro

I'm really liking the graphics. Such a beautiful map. Glad to see they are putting a lot of effort into ensuring historical accuracy

The dinasty of the Crown of Aragon at this time is actually called "The House of Barcelona", and they ruled for more or less 500 years, at first just Catalonia and since mid 1100 also Aragon.

Great video ludí! I love ur history input

The Luxembourg dynasty in Trier: Balduin was archbishop and elector of Trier from 1307 until 1354, an impressive rule of 46 years. He elected his own grandnephew as King of the Romans, Charles IV. (who was later crowned Emperor by the pope) in 1346.

The Movilesti were a precursor house/dynasty to the Bogdans, which were the the first rulers of a united Moldavia.

Borjigin is actually not a dynasty but one of the branches of Qyiat tribe. It is quite different from regular dynasties, since the Qyiat tribe was considered as noble tribe among nomadic folks.

For Moldova, I think there should be the descendants of Dragoș, the first founder of Moldova. Bogdan, the second founder, came in Moldova in late 1300s and killed the son of Dragoș (called Sas). Until Bogdan, Moldova was a military march loyal to Hungary.

I think, the place where the character lives would impact his/her religion and culture. A lot of Russian nobles spent half of their lifes in France and then spoke French better than Russian.

A little bit of CK in my life, a little bit of Vicky by my side, a little bit of EU is all I need, ya merging all my games in one big beast 🎵

The ruling dynasty in Aragon should be "el casal de Barcelona" because of the union between the ruler of the county of Barcelona ("Ramon Berenger IV") and the queen of Aragon "Peronella d'Arago" in 1150, so the male's dynasty should be the one, and if it was the female's one it was "la casa Jimena". Correct me if I am wrong

To be fair, it always was very important to have some kind of marriage between houses in Europe, even in the 18th century. Only that by the 1800s almost all the royal families were already related to one another. Thats why the the queen Victoria was basically related, through parents and children, to all the monarchies in Europe (mainly: Prussia, German states, Spain, Denmark, Sweden, Russia) the thing was to try to strike a blance between marrying the local nobles and marrying other monarchies. The only other way monarchies entered in alliances was through shared causes like coalitions or religious leagues.

Have to say this history book is dynamic.

Just a couple of ideas in case paradox devs are looking, and if you are this all looks pretty good can't wait, also Ludi great content as always keep it up and definite yes to royal marriage WC! It would be cool if we had a way to set up peace deals like the one that led to the Surrender Of Maine event at the start of eu4 for France and England - maybe a way to peace out with land being promised in 20 years or when your current ruler dies sort of thing. I'd also like peace treaties to be a bit more diplomacy based, maybe something turn based like HOI4, but also with the surrendering enemy having a place at the table. If they've still got something of an army left/they occupy territory then historically they should be able to counter offer or even try to claim some land of their own as part of the peace deal - sometimes even a losing country gained some land in a war. War being less generally map painty would be cool as well, slowly blanket sieging to win a long war is never fun - some sort of cross between CK3 and HOI4 would be cool with distinct victory points (but more dynamic because we will be able to build places up over time more than HOI4) and also taking advantage of the new character mechanics to make things like capturing the heir or spouse of your leader a massive chunk of war score. HOI4 idea again, but ship designer! There were all sorts of cool and interesting ship designs around in the age of sail and it would be fun to be able to create a hybrid merchant/heavy ship or a long range speedy circumnavigation machine for instance. I've not checked every dev diary so maybe this is confirmed, but tech tree? The linear path of tech is kind of lacking, it would be fun to have the ability to level up cannons, muskets or formations in military, or focus on architecture, currency or education for admin, for instance. That's 5 for now, and if any one of them was implemented I would be very happy, kind of expect some form of the third and fifth to be part of the game already. Oh wait the ability to make your own religion/form your own form of an existing religion during the reformation years!

Ludi’s videos on dev diaries are my reasons for living. Thank you for your content❤

3:58 maybe if the location they’re from rebels, the character also rebels, for example, if they’re a general, they become a leader of the rebel army

The fact they put Olivença in the hands of Portugal 😯

Hoi4, Victoria 3, EU5, CK3 making a collab game would be amazing too.

Honestly, the ADM/MIL/DIP reminds me a lot more of EU3 than it does EU4 what with providing something besides just... mana.

Not sure where to post suggestions for eu5, but here goes one: There should be a function for a unit (army or navy) that prompts an event bubble and pauses the game upon reaching the units final destination. In addition to that, the bubble should give a 'go to' option. This would simplify wars that span the entire globe and make life a lot easier imo. I have thousands of hours being subdued in life because of eu4, but this would help my condition.

They need to allow England to restore the House of Artois to the county of artois. Also does Scotland own a tiny slice around the Loire valley? If so thats cool because its what the de Bruce held in exile.

Oh look Paradox trying to portray Ludi as a king in EU5 lol the likeness is pretty good.

Actually, the more I learn about this game, the more I think it's Imperator Rome 14tth century.

10:19 you made my heart pit a pat. Cheers to Blackadder !

“That seems very, very, very easy just to conquer the world by marrying everybody” So basically there was this family called the House of Habsburg- 7:26

Regarding Moldova: Before its appearance, the East Slavic tribe of Ulichs lived on these lands, who disappeared under the onslaught of nomads and fled to other tribes and were assimilated.

Progression of Neighbor States ---> Gain Claim --> Go to war --> Force Vassal State ---> Force Vassal State Religion ---> Force Vassal State Relative to Throne. There! Those are the steps. All Dynasties going forward are my Dynasties!

Blackadder seasons 3 and 4 are the funniest imo. You have good taste Ludi.

2:00 Another thing taken by Imperator. I like with the amount of stuff they take from Imperator. I hope they also take the missions and ambitions system from it.

Fun fact Castille its most likle going to have a Civil war disaster or something if they change the disaster mechanichs, because is in 1350 when Alfonso Xl current monarch of Castille at the start died of the black plague traying to take Gibraltar, event that started a civil war betwen Pedro l the cruel or the just only legit son of Alfonso, and Enrique (future Enrique ll) one of the many bastards the King had and the count of TRASTAMARA 🧐🤔

Maybe place of birth could influence e.g. a general's skill in a certain environment (e.g. they are familiar with cold climate)

For the Capet in Navarre I think this has to do with Charles "the Bad" wich was a cousin of the king of France, as well as the king of Navarra and the count of Evreux, and tried to press his claim to the throne of France

Project ceaser salad looking great! 👍

I propose that paradox calls this project EU 5 and call the game Caesar to troll ludi

My only problem with what we have been shown so far is that the game mechanically is increasingly encroaching on Crusader Kings, when for me, I wish to see the later portion of Europa Universalis's timeline be explored. In Paradox games as the game progresses from the start date, the world increasingly becomes detached from anything resembling our actual timeline, which means that moving the start date backwards makes simulating things that occur later less plausible without additional start dates. I want to see the timeframe of 1600-1800 looked at more, and for cool and momentous historical events like the Seven Years war sometimes dubbed World War Zero in the game, but what I want looks increasingly out of scope for this project.

14:15 Denmark did exist, it just didn't have an "owner" 1332-1340 in Denmark is called "Den kongeløse tid" (The kingless time) most of the kingdom was pledged (mortgaged) to Holstein counts. yes mortgaged then Valdemar IV Atterdag (the epithet meaning "Return of the Day"), was to simplify a long story chosen as king. his daughter Margaret 1. would unite scandinavia under the kalmar union

It would be great to have a gradient map mode similar to the development map mode in EU4, which, when you click on a nation shows which nation you have a distant marriage/claim on. For instance, a cousin (under a different family name) that sits on the throne of another nation would be a darker colour and a distant great-grandfather would be a lighter colour

Every time I watch a ludi vid I get native deodorant ads

The house ruling aragon was the house of Barcelona

the way this game has been described and whats been showing has created a hypetrain on steroids

Cant wait to see the itsly map

maybe a ruler with a high badboy score would be more likely to have a "hunting accident"

9:18, speak for yourself, minmaxer. I look at the history stuff in ck3 and ck2 all the time. It help me find potential claimants, lets me, yes, admire the rulers, and also lets me bask in the wonder of the pre-game start history that they've bothered to include, which is an awesome attention to detail and worthy of your respect.

Im very excited. But really hope they do something about the way this map shows. There's just so many weird little countries and corners. Kinda hard to look at. I really like EU4's map, easy to look at. CK3 is also more chaotic but still okay. If they make it more like that then its a bit better i guess with multiple layers :)

The map of Vic 3, the characters of CK3, and the foundation of Eu4. This is the Frankenstein I always wanted. Now if you could draw front line commands like Hoi4, this game would be absolutely insane. 💯

I want to point out that while he was focused on Denmark, I noticed the part of Denmark he said was sold to Sweden in one of the other map videos was under the Swedish dynasty on this map. Which means the Denmark being divided thing may already be being represented.

One thing many forget that will be in EU5 is rise of timurids and Timur

I hope that the where the ruler is living could be tied to some bonuses, like if they are living in an urban centre there would be some bonuses to admin efficeny or even trade. On the other hand if ruler is on the countryside you could have some nobility bonuses. You could even tie this to some monuments like Versailles...

Please dear God let the launch of this game actually be good. Nothing would make me sadder than this game launching and being a buggy awful mess only to be patched up and completed 3 years later.

I really hope they rename Gediminid to Gediminaitis or Gediminaičiai (plural). Having Algirdas or Vytautas Gediminid feels so wrong

My hopes for the game that I haven't seen mentioned before (although I didn't dive that deep for it so sorry if somebody told it already, and i wasted your time): I know it probably requires a great amount of work, but I wish that the interface will reflect at least the current age you are in. In-game menu backgrounds, character portraits, any kind of 2D or 3D art you see in the interface (maybe music as well but that's probably too much). For me that would be great for immersion. I know Johan told in today's Tinto Talks discussion that the characters themselves would change over time (like getting funny wigs after a while), but i hope that extends to everything else as well, and we don't get things like tricorne hat advisors in 1350, like the commandant in EU4, which is only immersive in the second half of the game.

They need to make Timur and Napoleon important characters in this game.

This character/dynasty system is gonna be awesome for Anbennar I’d like to see the election system for republics if it’s just an event again or something more in depth

5:15 how can restoring the Roman Empire not be the greater good though?

A ruler or heir that was born in Stockholm should have a morale- and movement bonus when leading an army in battle in the Stockholm area. You should also be able to pick who is going to be your number two in PU subject's lands. And that choice should impact how the subject develops.

Ludi uploded the video faster than i could make dinner to watch it.

The Capets in Navarre was a woman, Joanne II of Navarre, who couldn't inherit France from his father, Louis X, but was allowed to inherit Navarre as its not male only, unlike France. Thus the personal union between Navarre and France ended with the death of the last male Capet king. She, however married Philippe d'Évreux (Philippe III of Navarre), a grandson of Philippe III of France, his 1st cousin once removed, and their son Charles II 'the Bad' of Navarre was a scheming figure, who, if we were to recognise the english claim that altough women can not, but male descendants of women can inherit trough the salic law, should've been the rightful king of France. He leveraged this position of his troughout his political career as well. However, it is important to note that the legitimacy of Joanne II was always a question, as her mother, Margeret of Burgundy (once again another cadet branch of the Capetians, just as in Portugal btw), was exposed of cheating on Louis X of France, which is why got locked up in a castle in Normandy, where she was ultimately, most likely, murdered, to make Louis X eligible to remarry (just for the sake of it, I have to mention that his new wife, Clementia of Hungary was also his relative, coming from the Anjou-Naples branch of the Capetian dynasty, the one that ruled Naples (and Hungary). In reality, the politics of France in the era preceding the 100 years war is so complex that, along with the War of the Roses, it served as one of the main basis for GRRM's Game of Thrones bookseries. (To be fair, these three are very much built upon each other in reality too, there's no 100 years war without the unfortunate and unlikely extinction of the Capets, and there's no War of the Roses without the events of the later 100 years war.

Imo, the admin, diplo, and mil sounds a lot less like EU4 mana and a lot more like CK3 martial, stewardship, learning, diplomacy, etc.

Can't wait to dominate as the ruler of houses 'The Mighty Knight' and 'the Expert Scholar'!

It seems like when a character is lets say in Avignon they might be give bonuses to there like production taxaction etc. But also when that city got sieged by the enemy, probably they will be taken as hostage or worse get themselves killed.

Rurik did not found the city of Novgorod. By 862, when Rurik got there, Novgorod was already a major trade city between the Norse and the Russians.

I hope we have the history map as in the EU4 on launch. I don't want to wait for simple map mods like religion map mode to come in updates 2 years later just like in VIC3. Also, hope they improved the history/battles recording mechanic, in line with their attempt to improve and make the rulers or characters more alive.

I need to find a NASA super computer to play EU V

“Project Caesar”, or whatever….lol

I have 2.5k hours in eu4 and did not know you could check previous leaders...

nah this is "Crusader Kings: Into the Future"

first mod I'd love to subscribe to: remove character's icons - only text

cool, gedimind all the way

17:56 Charles II « The bad » of Navarra has entered the chat.

I really hope that cultures are malleable, maybe not modular like in ck3, but maybe a system that takes stats into consideration to create bonuses or malices. High professionalism speeds up mil tech, yet one cultures pop die off disproportionately during conflict and they become more pacifistic. You have a high income and pops are more willing to invest, but in underdeveloped lands the pops are more susceptible to wasting their income. Starting and event flavor added in would be a massive plus as well

You think we'll be able to play as Timur the Lame in EU5? Loving that new Gurkanid formable in EU4

I click that ruler history button every single playthrough

You said that there should be a limitation on marriage between two rulers, I think it already exist in that most rulers are already married .

I can’t help but feel this isn’t actually *technically* an EU game because they’re going to split 1337-1836 into two different games covering roughly half that timeframe each and that’s why they’re still going by Project Caesar

Prepare for Lucemburgs all along the Europe 50 years in the game.

God i hope denmark can make a come back

2:46 Certiified bruh moment

March of the Eagles 2 right?

looks like eu4, ck3, and imperator rome