@@basilboluk nice thing

Q

T

@@basilboluk widow kg d

Basil Boluk ك

i was thinking the same thing that we should have one of each of this full set up in the rural town for when fires happen

MrDK0010 but in case of a wildfire say the fire burns out of control they wouldn’t have time to grab the equipment and run away

This is smth you build up far, far outside the immediate danger zone.

kbkbk

เดกกกกเฟฟฟฟกตไไำพะัwrhjgtqqqqwei2212124433yyytttstsffgfffffgfffffttt555u5555tu4443335?

🛺🚑🚐🚎🚍🚌🚋🚋🚞🚞🚑🚉🚈🏥

@wout kwanten 15-30 minutes plus an additional 15 min to fill up the hoses depends on the number of people you have available. In germany we have a system that is more efficient and faster. Just look for Hytrans Fire System (HFS)

Юг юг э4 юг

Is this not in Germany?

@@Luke-no3dg when I saw it right it is austria

@@1999Cheker Yes it is Austria. In some scenes you can see the name of the city. I looked it up and "Rankweil" (the city) is located in Austria.

Kkkggijfc, I ebu

Kadjhykkk

@@hareshgohil6977 I agree

😂😂

Kjgg🇮🇳🙈📣🤔📣🙂🙂🙂😚😚😙😐☺️🙂🦓🦓🦓🦌🦌🦌🦌🐷🐃🐃🐃🐖🐗🐽🦒🥑🥑🍑🥔🥔🥔🥦🥦🥬🥒🍅🍎🍏🍊🍒🍒🍄🥯🥒🥔🎗🎗🎎🧨🎆🎆🎄🎃🏀🏉⚽️🧱🌎🌏🗺🏜🏝🏘🏥🏤🏪🏪🏭🥁☎️🎹📣📢🔉🔉🔈🔕🎤📠🔋🛄🛄🏧↗️👭🙏👌👍👏🤝🇮🇳

Tfw you like a good comment on a video you’ve watched before and you realise it’s you who made the comment,

Qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqwwwwwwwwwwweeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

Would you like to drive a firetruck over that hose and possibly burst it?

Slightly over engineered, for sure. It's like they designed it with clearances for an F1 car's approach and departure angles, looks like their trucks could have driven over one made of railroad tie cribbing.

@@kevinvermeer9011 You know it went like ..... The system is 14 million dollars. How much is the little bridge? $14,000.00 Throw in two...no like I'm paying for it.....

@@charliebingaman571 Carry the Car by muscles... that would be faster than that

It has to handle 30ton/62000lbs fire engines so it has to be tough. Plus it has to be safe. 150% of max load shouldn't be a problem for it.

BBC vfv mz Ch BN.

0⁰llĺl

There is actually something simmering in my area that collects rain water and then is loaded up and taken to farmers where there is a drought

@@carterthreatt9681 p

@@ismailayhan8473 MMO

Բարե

Ոնցես

عفنفنقت

تبنبنفن

they can still supply nozzles which can flow 14,000 gpm

Thats what the pump is for.

It's like the kind of music that plays when a crappy superhero is getting ready

Fuck you that music slaps

@@averymarkow3815 Music was dope indeed

actually it's done quite quickly with its modular layout ...

@lee rice nope, not really; Of course it's not as fast as simply deploying a hose from a hose cart or hose bay, but it's not like it would take hours to set the system up and get it going

@lee rice no-one stated that this would work for every location... however in fact many large industries are alongside or nearby rivers and canals, and also commercial and residential areas are often next to lakes, canals and rivers of all sizes. Within a 10 mile radius around my village there are 2 rivers and dozens of lakes, with several lakes already being within 1.5 miles ... and my area isn't quite dominted by lakes; There are some areas which are clearly dominted by lakes or canals throughout a greater area. Btw there's the very same issue with long distance water supply when you take plain normal hoses and apparatus, often with multiple Portable Pump Vans / Trucks serving as booster

6 guys reloading in the back of truck

Aaron Vallejo huh

@@timothyshibu3098 just watch to end bud

there are hose recovery units on the modern pods like this

many fire departments can roll up with some good manpower. In my home town they had a station crew of at least 21 fire-fighters at a 47 bay fire station. Many Engines at volunteer departments are staffed with a crew of 9. Last year I was able to film a full house response of 18 units responding at once ...

We have 7 stations in the county I work at we are lucky to get 5 guys on a county all call​

قطه اطف

!skdfofgmfir

I think the fire would have burnt its self out bu the time they have it all rigged!

Rdr. Let

00

Graham Scobell usually this kind of equipment would be used in big fires (which could last for days/weeks) without a large enough water supply near the fire. And it also works great if you need a lot of water for those water cannons.

Do not forget you can pump away water from a flooded area too!

It's based on a stock truck chassis. And it might be a swappable bed. Also it's Germany.

there are some apparatus which are used like once in a decade but the equipment still HAS TO be provided for the case that sth happens. I know an Aerial in a German museum which never ever (!) went to an actual emergency call. In the city where I grew up the FD have a nitrogen vaporizer with an estimated call volume of 1 per year; In the town where I studied the chief told me "I've never seen that Pod Carrier on an actual emergency call before" after I filmed it responding to a fire call.

Night Fury Those are Austrian firefighters.

FDNY used to have something similar called the Superpumper system. I think the real use for this is a situation where the municipal water system goes down and you need to supply massive fire flows. Is it worth it? They think so.

@@Cthippo1 it definetly is; And while these systems can flow even more than the former SuperPumper, the FDNY runs a few of these things today as well

Huseyin

Kjsksjdhdhdi

Amen Adrian. Unless this is something for long term use, i.e. temporary water main replacement, what benifit is it? That has to be 8" or better hose. How much water does it take to fill this let alone start water movement?

large structure fires are one scnearios of course, but also keep in mind that there are other scenarios where you have to be able to flow large amounts of water, e.g. floods; Try to empty a flooded area by using the average supply and attack hoses and the average pumps on Engines and Tankers ...

@@EnjoyFirefighting Hmmmm in 35yrs on the job we never had to do that. But makes sense!

@@Wa3ypx I know two century floods and several other sometimes severe floods; Some of them lead to mutual aid convoys which basically involved departments from the entire country; Also after hurricane Katrina, apparatus from the German Federal Agency for Technical Relief went to the USA with several high volume pumps trying to empty flooded boroughs; It sure isn't a common scenario happening every year, but when it's necessary I guess department and people are happy that they exist; I've also seen a 1st person video from a Dutch FD responding to a structure fire in a warehouse; THey set up this kind of unit right from the beginning to have a great water supply from the nearby canal

Carl Loar California has similar systems in use, although the Cal Fire usually uses fire retardant, fire lines, and air support to fight most wild fires, they have used very similar set ups for massive industrial firws

lee rice “long distance water supply” it’s not designed to go up a mountain, it’s a supply line. It’s designed to bring water along a long area that lacks a hydrant or a static source to draft off of, allowing firefighters to have water without using a shuttling system with drop tank and lots of tankers. Misusing a system for something it was never designed to do is no reason to write it off

lee rice no. No one ever said it was, is California one giant mountain? No. There are flatter areas and large roaming hills. Wild land tactics change between them. If I need to set up a forward supply location to fill up a helicopter to allow it to more effectively do it’s job, I can use a long supply line to do that. If we’re utilizing rolling pumpers I can set a fill point much closer to the location of attack, if we’re trying to hold the line at a series of houses, we can use multiple long supply lines and boost pumpers to set up 1 1/2 attack lines with combo nozzles and create a fog cover to keep the fire back. There’s tons of ways you can utilize a system like this, although I don’t expect someone who doesn’t fight fire to understand the massive utility a system like this could offer the teams in the fields. There’s no way in hell someone’s dragging this line anywhere, supply line weighs enough dry, trying to haul any more then 500 feet with multiple people becomes an extremely difficult task, hense the truck deployment method shown in the video, alleviating the need for someone to drag 10,000 feet + of supply line. This is quite obviously designed to be used to extend my water source not being water up a mountain.

lee rice fire equipment is pricy, always has been and always will be. The fire department I’m on just finished paying off a 1.2 million dollar 100 foot ladder truck, the tax payers pay for their own safety, how much their willing to fund us will directly affect our ability to keep you safe. You should talk to your local fire department and see if they have the money to keep up with what’s required of them, the personnel, or anything in general. Unless your in a large city everyone is understaffed, underfunded and under equipped. I’m a tax payer too and I know my taxes go to necessary equipment. Btw that truck costs less than a fire engine, so mr tax payer, would you rather help your state buy a new engine at the price of 750,000 dollars or buy one of these for 300,000? To be honest I think it’s pretty shit of you to say something like that, how would you feel if it was your house or your property and the fire department didn’t have something they needed, what if they have to wait 30+ minutes to get water because of the shuttle distance, your arrogance and misunderstanding of the fire service is astounding since you think your opinion means anything at all, instead of being useless waste of oxygen how about you actually volunteer and do something

California could use this or Lake Tahoe

You need some other things FIRST !

Are your guys wild fires still going on?

@@elizabethridenbaugh7731 hey... no they are out now witch is great.. alot of homes lost and wild life hurt or burnt alive and some live stock hurt as well

It has been around for about 35 years, so what are they waiting for........

Robert Chinnock they gotta start expanding their airplane fleet to fight fires, it looked to me like they lacked a bit on this.

Well .. Call the Dutch . . . :-) Basically, it's a Dutch invention from the 70's and one of the main manufacturers is based in Holland (Hytrans). Over here, every district has several of these standard hook-pods, which can also be transported by civil trucks like those of construction Cie's Not only used for Industrial/Forest fires, but also for large normal fires, where the hydrant systems lacks capacity. In most districts, there called by protocol in case of 'Large Fire' (3 pumps) or worse. Typical deployment time from call to water approx 30mins

I was wondering the same thing.

The pin locates in a central hole on the ramp

Реально, так медленно, мне кажется у них недавно был сончас, такие медленные и соные

Вы не поняли маленько, это плановая тренирова/профилактика по наполнению прудов водой во время засухи. Так как мелкие водоёмы высыхают изза отсутвия осадков таким образом в Германии пожарные части их заполняют

HTFS: 3.000l/min @ 10bar & LUF: 11.000l/min @ 12bar... just a little difference ;)

@@danieldorr7517 sorry but the HFS HydroSub 1400 delivers 45000 lpm / 12 bar

Ouch... I didn’t even know that it exists. Shame over my head and thanks for the input. 😄👍

Well I think Firetrucks with built in tanks would arrive to the scene first and immediately start putting out the fire while this system sets up and then it can take over for much longer, because it doesn’t have a small built in tank.

I want to tell you that if you have 2,5k litres on firetruck, you will be out of water like just in one minute or so

The great distance that the water is moved is what makes it useful. All the water in the world is useless if you can't put it on the fire.

It's made to be stowable. And no "outside ridge" will stop a vehicle from driving off the edge of a ramp.

Also remember, nobody knows on which terrain they have to use the bridge. Keeping it simple/flexible might be a advantage here.

It looked like those were hydraulic operate pumps they floated out with the hoses.

@@kenmeinken8115 That is new to me, and something I haven't seen. I am use to seeing a hard suction hose hooked up to a pumper.

@@MatthewMello The units in the water are floating//semi-submursible waterpumps indeed.

@@MatthewMello I could use some hard suction

They are not sucking; the large machinery in the water are pumps (hydraulically powered via the two black lines connected to each) they force water into the soft tube

That was pretty awesome.

and then there are situations where mutual aid responses from abroad (!) are necessary to deal with the events which hardly ever happen but definetly will at some time ... Concerning your statement "very expensive, limited purpose vehicle" ... look closely at the video. It's a Pod Carrier / Roll-off container truck / hooklift truck: that equipment pod is special and purpose-built, but the truck can be used for dozens of different special equipment pods (containers), so this is far from limited purpose. It's not an entire truck built for only one purpose, but a carrier truck designed to handle all kinds of rarely used special equipment pods. They can range from Heavy Rescue to foam tanks, tanks with frozen carbondioxide and to nitrogen vaporizers, hazmat, decontamination, radiation protection, collapse rescue, crane equipment, basically any special operation you can think of

I'll bet CALIFORNIA is wishing they had at least one of these right now...

Do forget one point! It can be a supply hose line *to the fireplace* but it can be a *pump water from a flooded place* back into the river or sea too. Some hazard fire places are far away from water or broken supply hose lines build in earth or flooded places or repair/renew a channel or over flooded dams ... It is use here on a fire apparatus but can do so many more.

Yes. It locates in a hole in a lug on the ramp to stop sideway movement either way

Next one who didn't understand when this water supply is used

Correct

No, semi submersible pumps in the water for drafting.

" Setup time is horrendous considering the results" which result? Being able to flow large amounts of water with only one truck instead of numerous trucks on one line or running as shuttle. Of course this isn't what you use every day or once a week, but there are definetly scenarios where large capacity pumps are necessary ... not only large structure fires, but especially during floods. Guess that's why the German Federal Agency for Technical Relief came as mutual aid to the USA after Hurricane Katrina

It's definately worth the effort. German fire engines flow around 2000L per minute, so this system can supply around 5 engines. It'll take at least 5 engines to supply 1 engine over 2 km's. Basically, this thing does what 25 engines normally do. Simple maths: it takes time to set up, but compared to the alternative it's cheaper and easyer to set up. EDIT: I just now realised we are talking 12 km's, wich make the numbers even more ridiculous.

Love it. Also during that storm we needed help. But that’s also why the US has pumpers, tenders and tankers. But Germany’s fire Departments are a lot better then the USAs.

you can grab equipment easily from a lower level ...

🤦🏼‍♂️ its not that they are not extinguishing while setting these up 😂

Liam sels but what are they extinguishing with all the equipment needs each other if one part fails your screwed 😹

Ninja Drags why do you thing there are two pumps? Think before you speak

system was invented in the Netherlands, but the video clips right here are from Austria

@@EnjoyFirefighting Oh ok I appreciate your response , thanks my friend !

@Nutan Singh não entendi...

Tank trucks can carry 20.000 to 43.000 liter. This system can transport 11.000 liter per minute. Let's assume you need the water in a distance of 6km, a tanker can travel between these two points at 50km/h and holds 30.000 liter. So just to deliver the same amount of water this system does with 2 trucks you would need 5 tankers. (and that doesn't include the time it would need to fill the tankers) And on top of that, after the LUF system is deployed both trucks can be used for something else (both are swap-body-vehicles)

The pins fall into a little bracket that is midline to each section. At 5:05 there is a decent view of the brackets. The smaller sections on the ends of the ramps do not seem to have the same bracket though. Which seems odd

Patrick m I see it thanks for the info

Вы не поняли маленько, это плановая тренирова/профилактика по наполнению прудов водой во время засухи. Так как мелкие водоёмы высыхают изза отсутвия осадков таким образом в Германии пожарные части их заполняют

@@Wolframcarbid85 с трудом верится. Так как там насоса как такового нет. Бандура почти контейнер занимает а еле качает. У меня шахтный насос 60кубовый 3 кВт по серьёзней будет.

Quarter? Like 1/16 of the time. Lol

@@powereddragon2093 it takes my department 1:30 for a hydrant and 3:47 for pond drafting

so two Engines flow more than 14,000 gpm?

@@EnjoyFirefighting no. 7 of our ladder trucks do. And it takes like 30 minutes plus it's a lot better than having 2 useless ass trailers

@@dawsont933 trailers? I don't see any trailers here in the video; That container / pod system is mutlti-functional for all kinds of special operations and definetly more cost-effective than purchasing complete seperate trucks for all special operations, especially as some of them are used only a coupld of times a year: tanks with frozen carbondioxide, heavy rescue, nitrogen vaporizers, radiation protection, remote controlled robots etc That flow rate wouldn't be common for municipal fire apparatus here, rather for industrial apparatus. Take a flood scenario: do you really want to keep an Aerial stuck with it for several days, not being able to do it's actual job and run emergencies where the ladder is needed?