hahaha

shchzheams? even for me that is unpronouncable

*Szczrymmsz*

I tried this unit to flank an armored swordsmen, while a main unit attacked them frontally, the Woodsmen killed less than 20% of the enemy but the enemy routed my woodsmen. My main unit stood their ground. I even tried a 1v1 of the Woodsmen against a Town Militia and still lost. Meanwhile the Hungarian Croat Axemen performed much better than the Woodsmen against the same Town Militia.

@@ericairlangga2955i used dismounted polish nobles as the anvil and hammer with woodsman until i can free up cav to finish off

Except they don't in this game... 😭😭😭

Winged Hussars were 16th-18th cavarly, that's why they are not in the game.

@@DartVejder1 Game ends in 1500s. Also, that wouldn't be the worst offender for historical inaccuracy. May as well have them because why not?

@@huntclanhunt9697 Imagine a 16-18th century armed hussar charging the knights of the 13th / 14th century. This would create too much of a contrast, the armament of the winged hussars was adapted to later times when there was no knighthood and warfare was completly diffrent. The armor itself was masterfully made in terms of metallurgy and stopped musket shells without any problems even in the 18th century, such looking armor could not have made it in the Middle Ages. Hussars were also using pistols and lances that were 4,5 - 6,2 long, then much longer than in medieval times. The look itself would not fit at all, the armament was completely different at that time. It's like in Rome 1 there were Egyptians modeled on those from the Bronze Age (that was awful for me). That's my opinion. I just like accuracy. Winged hussars are much more suited to the Empire: Total war

I don't like Polish faction because all the interesting historical units are not in this game. I want good late heavy cavalry and wagons. For similar reason I can't make myself play Turks too. I want okayish horse archers early on,(horse archers are always op against infantry) which will be outdated (other countries must start to get better horse archers) compared to mid and late game. I want okay mid game infantry, and great late game gunpowder units. What I basically want is a little more mediocre version of Scythians with late game musketeers. And I don't even want to talk about HRE. Oh, the HRE 😬😬😬

focus on Russia first, since you can fight them as much as you want without getting in trouble with the Pope and try to make allies with Hungary's potential enemies like Venice or the Byzantines, Hungary is tough to fight against as Poland because Hungary has waaay better infantry, so sieges WILL be a massive pain, so I used some Mercenaries to even the odds

@Krzysztof Cieszyński nie zapominaj, że ludzie wciąż są tam zajebiści. Rządzi nimi pupilek Putina. Tak samo jak Kartoflany Imperator.

@@hannibalburgers477 The Turks are surprisingly good. Great mix of troops.

I wish if the IA Poland had the same opinion when I play as Hungary. Whatever faction I play Polish just begin WAAAAAAAAAAAGH as soon as I border them!

Accurate af

Urban_Hoplite moors! Don’t forget the moors.

@@Gremlin_Wizard Moors are not European, they just occupy European territory.

Lord Alex I wasn’t making a point about moors being European, I don’t know where you get that idea from. Also even if I was, what constitutes as being European? Don’t most European nations today have ancestors who invaded Europe, just way back? I think what makes moors not European by your standards is the fact that they couldn’t get a foothold in Iberia.

@@Gremlin_WizardThey are not European the same way Turks are not European.

Lord Alex How do you count one country as European?

Thanks for the pronunciation help!

I just wish they had more heavy infantry

bullshit, you have to pronounce the - rz - in the word..

Doesnt that mean shooters or something?

@@ZecaPinto1 archers actually

It's an amazing unit. One charge could kill half of an armored swordsmen unit. The Polish Retinues delivers the same result too. They're amazing cav.

Yeah, from our point of view, it's quite simple, but I guess it is hard for them, just like this word from german: Fünfhundertfünfundfünfzig

@BlewndziorMLKV because you have Halych as recruitment center and Thorn is relatively good money maker if turned into a town. Furthermore it is in no immediate danger of being attacked if you expand into the baltic region and into western pomerania where Stettin and Magdeburg is although you need to be lucky to snatch it before the HRE.

This comment is an eye opener for me bcs it made me realize that it's more profitable to convert coastal castles in to a city. Other examples would be between Bordeaux and Toulouse, now I tend to convert either one that has less profit if there were more than one coastal castles in the same range. Also I won't convert it if it was my only frontline castle in my territory like Nottingham (facing against Scotland), until I destroy Scotland, I often convert it in to a city.

Thanks man

dismounted polish knights can do this job.

Hussars are better anyday. 1 less defense than Feudal knights but more damage cheaper and way faster.

Scotland is worse

White Eagle pikes suck, and most of their troops have low armor and get rekt by missles, and they only have like 3 missile units that aren’t even good

Best Catholic Faction