this like likely due to relative position between launcher and Barrel/ Scope. ATGM ends up having to dip down and to the right.

Because ATGM launcher is so far from the autocannon, you can actually make it do a smaller turn if you play sb/enable gunner's optics as your sight

There is something stramge with tows they really dont like turning a bit of turn can get the missile sway like crazy

The first tow is just garbage now every time you fire at close range it spin for 5 minutes then if the targets too far it starts to spin again it can hardly turn aswell, it just suck

Shooting in third person helps, easier to aim point blank, helps to avoid obstacles, and you can use your scope for longer ranges

ATGMs are so fucked on most vehicles rn, it's so frustrating to use them closer than like 500m, but even at long range they just wobble so much it's always a gamble where you'll hit.

The game kinda sucks now 😕

you know its bad when the ROBLOX warthunder has better TOW mechanics

the bradley is fine is equalt to any 8.3 IFV, if there is one IFV that is the worst than everything else would be the warrior, bur bradley fine, and I don't think BMP2,Marder,Warrior etc, have better survivability than Bradley, I mean survivability on IFV is something that doesn't matter since is not their role in game.

​@@ragnarokinfall8565Ironically enough I've won point-blank encounters with the Brad due to most people trying to shoot it center mass which usually ends with their shells being eaten by the frontal engine leaving them open for either a serving of 25mm APDS fries or a double-TOW sandwich.

8.3 Bradley is ok. The 10.0 Bradley is when the suffering truly starts because you’re essentially playing the same exact thing except you get the better Tow2 As and can use the commander optics. That’s it.

@@cuhyotepowered1201 they both are fine, and bruh A3 doesn't only gets that, you get 3gen thermals both gunner and commander, APFSDS,TOW2B, and IRST, and slighly better armor. and spall liners.

@@ragnarokinfall8565 Gen 2 thermals, and the spall liners only cover the crew compartment and a random section of the side near the driver, so don't expect them to do much. Bravos are also extremely unreliable, and ironically in my experience, tend to perform better against Leopard 2s than Ts. Overall, though, not unplayable even at top-tier, you just have to be very campy and use defilade.

Frrrr. But we need some abramses also

😂😂😂 right

My condolences

Me thinking usa above 7.7 will get better

That was quick

bro is waiting when malzi posts

Dang Bros menacing 💀💀💀💀

Day 2 of me asking you to get professional counseling

Bro, you ain't at 216. There's no way you're ahead of me.

Not a Russian lover but uh.. They had to bombard that T-90M with so many rounds before a lucky shot hit the turret ring

A reminder that around 100 Bradleys are currently smouldering in Ukraine

@@venvapingcatcult7052 It was also hit by an FPV drone. A true testament to the T90's survivability, I say. (Plus those two pesky Bradleys were destroyed later + T90 crew escaped and said T90 was repaired) Edit: No TOW’s

@@m16-a2 It wasn't hit by TOW missiles. The Bradleys and the T-90M unknowingly met each other and the battle was somewhat one sided when the T-90M missed its shot. The Bradleys smothered the T-90M in 25mm HEI (?) for a while and eventually one round jammed the turret ring. The driver obviously panicked and hit a house and the crew safely bailed. An FPV drone then successfully permanently destroyed the tank. I feel like none of the vehicles should be praised for what has happened. Vehicles like the Bradley has fast firing autocannons that can easily damage the turret mounted electronics of tanks at close range. The T-90M was already at a massive disadvantage and i doubt it could've won anyways. They are lucky that they didn't meet a pair of CV9040s though. That would've been a very bad time for the T-90M crew.

@@venvapingcatcult7052 True. Its funny to see people criticise what happened to the T90M and say ‘RUZzIa BAd!”, but forget that any tank can be “blinded” by an autocannon. I’ve heard that ground mounted ZSU-23 and 37 AA guns have stripped Abrams of their electronics and sights (in Afghanistan and stuff)

Theoretically shut up

Pentagon wars is reformer propaganda garbage it sounds funny the first time you watch it but its trash sadly

bait

What the first guy said

I love Malzi, but I rolled my eyes at his camping comment in the video. Dude finds a good defensive position and kills Malzi. Malzi was just mad that the other guy killed him by having a different playstyle.

This isn't top tier though.

Especially with US tanks at 7.7+, that's like the only good thing you can do since they can't really brawl.

8.3 bradley is fine, 10.0 bradley is the worst

@@BarryAllen__1A23 warrior,or any other british IFV do infact exist-

there arent that many.

Cope lmao

Bradley ended up in Moscow,but there is a nuance

@@Daleko_ne_Vladimir... "But here's the catch!"

​​@@Daleko_ne_Vladimir Yeah, IFVs do indeed get destroyed in a war, that's a pretty normal thing to happen. You know what isn't normal? Having a state of the art tank miss an IFV point blank range twice, and then lose its turret to a burst from an autocannon made in the 80's

@@Daleko_ne_Vladimir 1 Abrams. What accomplishment is that? Tens on tens of T-90s are burning.

Like a rat. You just feast off of light vehicles and a few ATGM kills on heavier tanks. Pretty good AA too since the cannon can elevate pretty high and has a good turret rotation speed.

Tows are absolute garbage

@@leprianto4930 at least it has 12 of them

​@@suzanarubi9254 12 useless shots because Gaijin doesn't know physics.