My grandpa was a machinist for Ball can. His job was manufacturing replacement parts for the assembly line and later for the fully automated can press that replaced the assembly line. When they got a CNC mill, he kept his job by showing that he could make 10 parts in the time it took to program the CNC. Once they had all the parts coded and saved to 5.25" floppy disks. His job became making parts to fix the CNC mill.

I was taught by old machinists from way way way back in time. I wasn't allowed to use digital readouts. I learned more about the work itself that way and I had a deeper appreciation for it.

We had a old Milwaukee #7, dragged out of a retired carrier, from WW II. We keyed 30' heavy shafts on it. It was a beast. Tight all over, could probably cut straight, during an Earthquake. Bored out engines on it. If you worried about vibrations, that was the mill.

I have been making chips for 40+ years. There is a time and place for everything, EVERYTHING. One thing he mentions is true, companies/engineers that over complicate parts to justify a much higher price is common place and it has been so for a long time yet it is so wrong. Long live the Axleson lathes and Bridgeport mills.

Writing simple programs is dead easy and fast with most conversational CNCs. I think that it is very rare for a fully manual machine to be the best method. I learned on manual machines and ran them for a while. I think everyone should start manual because it teaches a lot of basics but CNC capability almost always compliments a machinist's skill

ProtoTrak has been a lifesaver for me and 1,000's of small job shops. A happy medium between full on cnc and full manual.

Knowing how to do it manually, makes you a better CNC programmer and machinist in general. When I need to make a replacement part for one of our other machine tools, i program it as if i were making a thousand of them. I want to have the majority of the work done in one clamping, to minimize errors. Of course, if it was designed / programmed wrong in the first place, then the problem is me, not my machines. I pretty much grew up in the machine shop. We had Strippit punch presses, Wysong shear, lots of welders, a basic Bridgeport mill . My first cnc was a Weideman punch press in 1985. Later i got a Fadal machining center then the Mori Seiki turning center. You pick the process that makes sense for the part and quantity.

When a level headed machinist absolutely calmly dunks from the 3 point line on engineers. 🎉 🎉

As an engineering student i completly agree with you. There are so many parts and things today that are overcomplicated for no reason at all. It's some thing that really isn't beaing tought that to be a good mechanical engineer at any point of production is the try to make things as simple as possible. Most things made today are complex just for the sake of beaing able to say they are doing somthing new, but i think most people don't realise that we have been using processes made and thought of 50 year or more ago.

When asked about this I respond with something along these lines - manual machines are great when you make a wide variety of parts but not a whole lot of each at a time, CNC takes over when you have a lot of one part to make, not enough people to make the parts, or the engineer designed something they can fap to instead of a practical part.

Edit: I should say first that I'm not a machinist. I'm a millwright, and we delight in mucking around in everyone else's trade, so of course I do machining. I've only watched about 4 minutes of the video so far, and I totally get what you're saying about the programming time, but I will say (and I expect you would say the same) that there are circumstances when CNC is waaaaaay faster. At work I have one machine tool (other than a small saw and hardware-store drill press) and that is an ancient Mori-Seiki SL-15 CNC lathe. On that lathe I occasionally produce tiny parts for our machinery by the thousands. Once every 6 months or a year I have to power the thing up and try to remember how to use the antiquated Fanuc 10A controller on it, and cajole it into making 7 or 10 or 15 thousand parts for me using a bar puller. We don't have a bar feeder, mind you... I have the aluminum rod cut to 4' lengths so that it won't propeller in the machine, but I can get fifty good parts out of every rod, and over the course of a day (24 hour production) we can make about 1800 of them. There is no feasible way that I could make that happen without CNC. The guys operating it at night are temp workers... they're not trained machinists. They take a part to QC to have it checked for size, and other than that they just put in a new stick of material and push the green button. Having these parts made would cost $3 per (I've had it quoted) and I can make them for about 12 cents a piece on this lathe that cost us $5K and still holds tenths (if you keep the temperature consistent... I get smaller parts at night than I do during the day). Still, you can't argue with a situation like that. I spend two or three hours writing a program and testing it, and from then on it's a few minutes to get the lathe going (clear out the coolant channels and refill the way oil) and it's off to the races. On even a thousand parts the time spent programming it dwindles to near nothing. The last run was 7000 parts, so the programming time *per*part* was about one second, and the next time I run them it will be zero seconds, because the programming is already done. Also, this machine thrives on neglect. I like that in a tool. :)

Horses for courses. First thing is to give your manual machinist equipment that produces round, parallel and square parts. Lathe or mill. Give them dro's, suitable chucks, vices, clamps and tooling. Good lighting and work space but of number one consideration should be drawings with a layout that matches up with how something is made. Dimension from outer portion if it sticks out of a lathe chuch etc. So sure, have a part finished drawing but give them a " construction drawing" toleranced, surface finish requirements, straightness and concentricity details. Let them get on and make it instead of spending time making drawings.

I am a retired mechanic and in my home shop I have a very old Logan turret lathe, from 1941. I have worked in the machine shop as an apprentice using the newer machines, including the CNC and I can say honestly that I prefer the old machines. It's a slower pace of life and is more enjoyable than the ultra fast paced get it done now pace. I should point out that I just turned 50 years old, so I am old enough to know what the fast pace is and never really knew the slow pace from years prior. We are missing a lot because things are going so fast and everything is in such a rush.

I admire your philosophy. You are a true inspiration. If you're ever in Northwest Ohio you'd fit right in at our place

Look, there are many fair points here. When you have a hammer, everything is a nail. But dismissing the capabilities of CAM design and CNC fabrication is shortsighted. I'm 100% on board for simplicity, repairability, and integrating the design+build cycle. Designers should understand how things are made. But it is absurd to ignore the true capabilities and efficiency of CAM+CNC. There are indeed new components, assemblies, and systems that truly could not be fabricated without CAM+CNC, and that solve real problems that analog fabrication cannot. I have a background in architecture, a masters degree in architecture, and currently run a university fabrication lab with CNC routers, plasma cutters, laser cutters, and 3D printers, AND analog woodworking, metal working, and composit fabrication machining processes. Often I'll make a component by hand, because it's faster and easier. Often I will design a part using 3D modeling software, build a toolpath, and make a part with a CNC machine, because it is appropriate. It's all about the right tool for the right job. Both analog and digital tools have their place. But dismissing the truly new capabilities of CAM+CNC fabrication is self-limiting. Plus, a lot has changed since 1976. You can't solve problems using the same mindset that created them in the first place. And it's also about how you are participating in the world. If repair, maintenance, and day-to-day fabrication is your bread and butter, CAM+CNC may not make sense. If prototyping, experimentation, cutting-edge research, and problem-seeking is your focus, CAM+CNC is another essential tool in the toolbox.

I love working on the manual lathes and mills, and use them fairly often. I totally agree that in some cases, the manuals can actually be faster than the CNC. Especially single features involving one tool. Eg; counterbores in a number of parts. There is a certain kind of zen feeling I get working on the manuals. They also make the work day fly by. However, there are parts we make (robotics industry), that absolutely have to be made on a CNC. It's not that you couldn't do it on a manual. It's just that given the quantities, and features that involve interpolating holes or surface milling, etc...they just have to be done on a CNC to expect any kind of productivity. On the flip side, if your shop is mostly repairing large shafts for the mining industry, that sort of thing? I could totally see a large manual machine being the way to go. It really just depends on the kind of work you're getting, I think. I really don't think it's an either/or scenario. They're both great, and they both have the purpose.

I did a research project on the history of CNC machining when I went to trade school ( industrial technology- sort of engineer-y, but also sort of trades-y ) and the biggest advantage that was touted by the people that created this technology, was the repeatability factor. They were just trying to engineer the “human” out of “ human error “. I have to agree with you, there are reasons for CNC, and there are reasons for manual machining. I think it comes down to the engineering, and the lack of production sense that asks the question “ Just because we can, SHOULD we?”. Keep up the good work 👍.

Full disclaimer: I'm still working on my degree and have very little experience in the machine shop, but I like to have opinions on everything! As far as why the constant bias towards CNC/3d printing, I think its because thats what more accessible in terms of cost and space. I mean, even up at the university, most of the guys I know spend all their time in solidworks, then 3d print it becasue its so much easier to set one up in a dorm room. If thats all you end up working with, it just becomes what you know, so it becomes the hammer and nail problem. The other thing is that learning how to work with G-Code on a 3d printer has a lot of cross over with CNC Mill or Lathe programing (so I'm told), so its an easy way to start getting familiar with it without having to invest the money and space into a full machine shop setup. Furthermore, the CAD programs we are taught typically contain a tool path generation function, often with a companion simulation function to run that tool path on the computer before it gets run through a machine. This makes visualizing the entire processs easier, along with giving a very flashy animation to show off to everyone who needs to see it. Again, when thats the perspective that you visualize the entire process through, it makes every part look like a CNC'ed part. It also doesn't help that companies like to advertise "machined from a single block of aluminum". Sure sounds flashy, but that does sound like a lot of wasted material! I wish we had more classes with a hands on learning without using computers all the time. Not even as the whole class, but just one or two more hands on labs per class. The only reason I kept going with an ME degreee path was because of the machine shop lab for Industrial Processes! Its staggering how much you learn about production when you actually have to build the thing yourself, and it just makes you appreciate the time and effort of going though each class that lead up to that moment.

I have no cnc machines in my workshop. I don’t tend to make ultra complicated parts but what do make I enjoy the machining process. But like Ford vs Ferrari. Both have a place in their market. One is mass production nice products the other is bespoke hand made. One sells 100 million the other sells 100 thousand. End of the day both sets of customers are happy and staff at both enjoy their jobs. No matter cnc or manual machining just enjoy what you make.

The right tool for the right job. The people who won't give you one off work because you dont have CNC's are probably looking for some place that can also pump out larger runs.

The first NC mill, I ever had to work with, was bigger than my bedroom, about fourteen feet high, with a table, about the same as a Bridgeport. Tape ran, had to climb a few steps, to operate it. I couldn't see how it could pay for itself, in my lifetime. Ran a tracer mill, too. Modern CNCs, are made for production, some, have gantries and robots, that seem to have disdain for humans. Kinda like what some women, think of men. As I was running a Kitamura, twenty second cycles, and three tools. Face and plunge with an endmill, drill through, and ream. I designed a machine, to cycle them through, in half the time. All I needed to do was sand off the flash, and feed them into the tube. Now that was for the four different cams in the Ford transfer cases. Not all cycles are twenty seconds. The 5th & 6th, and reverse forks, for Borg and Tremec, had three ops, and over three minutes of cycle time. Most of the in-between time, was getting the forks parallel. The coolant was aimed so as to allow fixture changes, while running, so it wouldn't stop. Because there was always a truck, waiting to go to Mexico.

I have a small manual machine shop that can make about 30 p/n's of the product that a major client once made. The volume is low- 6-20 pcs per run generally. It's not a very juicy job for a job shop, and the logistics of getting me the parts is an outsize cost at that volume. Gotta write a PO, pay for delivery or go there to pick up, etc. Might even have to negotiate or clarify the job to the machinist. Or I can order 6 feet of material from McMaster-Carr, and consume it making a p/n. Under this scenario, I won't be tempted by CNC until I want to make their more sophisticated p/n's. But that can wait. Currently installing DRO's and good places to keep everything at hand to minimize excess movement during an operation. I am sure that the DRO will close the gap to the CNC throughput significantly.

I Love my manual machines... its where I started and prided myself with the quality of work I could produce. Fast FWD 20+ yrs... I run CNC machines at Work and in my buddies shop... I have manual machines in my garage... being a Tool and Die guy... we do a lot of one off parts with relatively decent tolerances... .0002" - .001", some of the butter jobs are called out to a .003" - .005" tolerance... 😂 Anyway, My manual mindset runs strong so I run the CNC mills like a manual machine. Most of the time I have programs i.have wrote that i keep in the log where i can pull up and change a few things... example: bolt holes... all i have to do is use the probe, let it find center, open my program change the tool, Z depth, my 'I' and 'L' hit go/green. Lol If i were still in the Navy at the base shop, I'd be using a Bridgeport with a DRO, and it would easily take twice as long to do a simple part as such. There are parts that I do that need to be done on a manual machine... typically those jobs are relatively large and are too big for pur CNCs. If i had to choose between having a cnc mill or a manual mill in my garage... for argument sake a HAAS VF2 or a Bridgeport with a 52" table with auto feed on The x, y and z... I'd choose the VF2. Cost savings the manual machine wins hands down... long term money made the cnc will handly win against the manual machine.... the cnc has more to offer for jobs, faster turn around times, and trust me when i say, I dislike saying that because I'm still a manual guy at heart. The cnc eliminates a lot of the costly tooling required to make manual operations effectively efficient. The biggest issue i see, are these kids from college that have an engineering and design degree, they come into the shop and start designing stuff that is impractical and in some cases impossible because they dont understand machining practices and the shops capabilities... they have theory but lack practice.

I really like your videos I met you in fairbanks last year you always have really good advice

CNC is the better option because 1 person can run multiple machines. There is a serious shortage of qualified people in the industry. Automation is where it's at in 2023 and in the future

Times have changed with designing parts in the 70's-80's. Parts aren't just flat, square or rectangles. Most parts do multiple things. less assembly and hardware needed. They can be made (fancy as you say) to reduce weight. So, machining on a cnc makes more sense. Been machining since 1983, So I did a lot of manual machining. Now own a shop with cnc mills & cnc lathes. Manual yes, I have still. Bridgeport is the best drill press in the shop. Manual lathe mostly for polishing and occasional government job.

Well sure, CNCs are but tools, no? Proper place and situation in utilizing them. I think anyone who views manual vs CNC as opposition and one being better than another, is in foolish thinking. I enjoy using both, utilize them in thier proper situations, and don't understand the vs. mentality. *shrugs*. Great video as always!

One of the things I like to do with manual support machines for my VMC is stock prep. I'll cut my stock and then mill one edge of it to establish a true surface and then that edge gets butted up against a stop in the vise of the VMC. Sometimes simplifies things when I have a part that just needs brought to size from stock and some features machined into it. The alternative is putting in soft jaws and doing both ends in the CNC and sometimes it's faster to prep the one edge on the manual and then use parallels and regular hard jaws in the VMC.

I do almost exclusively one of parts (Tool and Die department), we have thrown out all but one manual lathe and a mill that gets used maybe 2 hours in a week, all other machines are CNC. IF you have your cnc speced and setup for one of parts then it is hard to find a job that would be quicker on a manual. To take the flange part as an example once that is clamped into the machine it would take less then 30s to probe the center of it then i would go to my computer next to the machine and open the cad/cam and click make hole circle, select 8 holes and a diameter. Then select the thread size from my macro list and click on one of the holes, change how deep i want to drill and tap hit calculate and send program. This is less then 2 minutes for a ready program and now i am drilling with a high hp spindle, through coolant carbide drills etc so those holes would be drilled, tapped and chamfered in no time. All this requires that you are setup for one of parts with both the right machine and cad/cam software. I have 60 common tools ready in the machine and prob 30 "less common" outside the machine that i can insert manually in the spindle. All of those tools are also in my tool list in the cam program with cutting data etc ready and in my cam macros. The Jobs were a manual would be preferred are stuff like repair/modifications on certain old parts with no drawings available (especially irregular shaped castings) and where you have to take of some material by eye and maybe shim the part into a weird angle. The last job i sat up in the manual mill was ironically a rather large batch with stamped parts. A single hole needed to be countersink and after machining the fixture in the CNC i moved it over to the manual.

I’m not a machinist by trade, I’m an electronics engineer. But if I need less than a handful of simple mechanical parts I’ll just machine it on a manual mill and lathe and I design mechanical things so I can manually machine it easily. If I need more than maybe five or ten parts, I’ll send it out to a shop and let them decide if they want to do it manually or on a CNC.

Yea and the buggy whip manufacturers were real mad at Henry Ford. I ran some of the first NC machines in 1978 and they were clearly a game changer. I also ran tracer machines. Wire EDM machines were also a huge improvement.

great video. I just started machining school and I needed this video

The difference between a machinist and a machine operator, is that the machinist can still do accurate work on an old, worn, manual machine.

the most annoying things I watched freshmen 3d print when I ran the college 3d printing lab were - flat plates with holes in them - gears - spheres or hemispheres - sticks would have loved an actual machine shop class honestly, took me until doing a student racecar club to realize how to actually design things practically

this guy needs to experience the joys of a mazak sqt 15 with live tools and the old conversational control. programming is so easy once you get used to the language

I’m really good at programming manually. I’ve done it for 20 years. That said we do keep a deckel around and a manual b-port, but generally I can do one offs faster on the Mazak or the old V2xt. But, I do a lot of other crap other than making parts while my little Mazak is running.

CNC is good for mass production when you don't have to change the program for various different parts. The only thing is regular maintenance is still required. A manually made part is better for many different parts that require precision machining

My shop has both because we can run the simple stuff on the manuals while the CNCs do the more complex or involved jobs and not need to keep track of that many extra programs. I don't get the rivalry, I think it's important to know both so you have that many more tricks for when you can't do it the way you would have preferred.

I've pretty much spent my career half on manual and half on CNC, on large Horizontal borers and vertical borers On the big machines I'd much rather run a CNC. There's no replacement for learning all the how to and why to's on a manual Though. Most of the lads I've worked with that only ever done CNC usually end up lacking alot of the foundational stuff you just learn organically on a manual

I have an almost brand new Cnc mill with the probe and tool changer. I have a new Prototrak bed mill as well. I do prototyping for aerospace. The Prototrak is the best of both worlds. If it had an automatic tool changer it would be perfect. You can use it manually or as a cnc and programming is easy thru the conversational control. I like that it’s open and you can get right up on the part with a loupe if you need to to really dial something in. That being said, these are $140,000 worth of machines. And the software is $3000 a year.

programing is way faster than it has ever been and yes a good cam software is faster from scratch than a manual machinist with everything laid out ahead of time.

3d is important for foundry production tools. The tooling that makes castings cab be very complex, and they used to do it on a bench with wood. Now it’s done on a cnc, and it’s super fast compared to the old school. Bench guys are very valuable still, probably paid more than cnc guys. The bench guys are masters of the manual trade in pattern work

The way I see it. CNC is more for product production, not one offs . Or possibly complex jobs. Where multiple processes are required. It's like using a micro controller to flash a light, a simple flasher will do the job!

I only run manual equpiment at home (for a hobby) and my work is nothing to do with machining at all (though I have done a little CNC a long time ago). His last statements say it all (taliking about self driving cars) - he says he doesn't want a computer driving for him and also that "it's no fun". But self-driving cars are vastly superior to human drivers. They still occasionally crash and they're not perfect, but you're more likely to have a crash if you're in control manually. So even when something is demonstrably better, the 'old ways' are still preferred. This mindset is why he doesn't want to consider CNC - and they've come a long way from the film he talks about. Making a 3D drawing in CAD is a lot easier and faster than it used to be and depending on the designer your 'drawings' may even come as a 3D file ready for the CAM software. Good CAM software is also quick and easy to use. For the CNC run it doesn't matter that there is a (possibly) unwarranted complex curve - the CNC will produce the part to the original spec just as well and just as fast whether it has a complex curve or a simple step so why not create more aesthetic pieces? Finally, regarding how many pieces before CNC is better - I'd much prefer to pay labourer rates to keep stock up and replace/sharpen tooling to CNC equipment that is cranking out product while my machinist does initial setup/CAD/CAM for other work, than paying machinist rates for manual repetition that a mindless machine could do faster. It's just good business (alhtough a bit sad for machinists admittedly).

We’ve had jobs come in that, in the past would have cast in features, that they want fully cnc’ing from standard stock (flame cut plate and whatnot) not realising how long that kind thing can take. For the sake of saving money on the castings. Saying that our shop has several millions on cnc machine tools, but we still have a load of manual machines and in my humble opinion manual machines are irreplaceable

This was a great story … we were just having a manual , CNC discussion today …

My uncle owned the largest shop in my city he built it from scratch He had manual machines from the 1940s up to cnc machines in the late 70s so yes i worked in the shop. On big jobs you keep making the same part for an industry cnc machines are the way to go Smaller jobs manual machines are the way to go. You get a million part order you might find your doing the parts on both manual and cnc machines at different stages. One type of machine is faster. We used a horizontal mill on part of the job then it went onto a vertical mill to do 5 more operations then out to plating and back to a 3 head drill press to assembly finish work and inspection. Each order was a million parts we over all made 10s of millions of them. As far as i know they all got used up during the gulf war.

The game changer with CNC is repartition of item...also it reduces subsequent setups because of ability to store the parameters.

To me this boils down to: how long does it take one person to to set up end produce X number of part( s) versus all the the time to write the program set up the CNC, prepare the raw material for the CNC and run X number of parts. Some times an assembly line set up of different machines is faster than one CNC. If all depends on what the part is ( complexity) and efficiency.

I completely agree with everything you say in this video. Especially about poor engineering. I guess I'd say im 50/50 you want CNC or Manual get a prototrak. We sold our 2 bridgeports for 2 traks and they are awesome. Go I to DRO mode if you want to go old school, but you have the option of CNC for curves without a table.

Howee fears no engineer. Great stuff

The rapid release of internal stress in the material will always be the cnc machines down fall, plus a computer can not compensate for unforeseen conditions. I was building a mold for a simple sink plug and they had a call-out for +/- .0001" on a corner radius. Their tolerance was higher than the expected shrinkage of the material after the molding process and it was completely pointless, that radius could have been +/- .030" but the technology is there so let's take advantage of it. Cut the tolerance in half and you double the production time, so keep that in mind.

I love repairing antique motorcycles, designing "reliability improvement parts" or just all around piecing them together. Its hard to beat a well built manual machine with good tooling/work holding for what I do. Saving my pennies for the digital threading upgrade for the lathe though. I could do without messing with those gears 😂

With modern controls, especially conversational with a probe and tool setter i think you could program and run a part quicker than a manual machine

CNC’s are great for parts with precision curves.

A foundry guy came in with a job of making two pipe flanges. Inch thick, Procut hotroll, for a two foot pipe. I made the first one, two key slots, four holes. Had a DRO, without the bolt circle calculator, so I used my calculator, clamped it once, drilled and machined it once. The lathe guy is making the second one, the mill doesn't have enough travel to just drll the holes N,S,E, and W. So being a lathe guy, math is taboo, he dialed it in three times, and clamped it down, three times, to drill four holes and two notches. Math can mean the difference between profit and loss.

0:55 That would have been a lot more interesting if they gave a CNC programmer and journeyman machinist the plans at the same time and had them make a few copies of the part. Regardless of who finishes first, you'll be able to see the difference in preparation time and time per part once you're up and running.

Amen, John.

Sort of the part you speak of if you were serious you would have a fixture for that holds 2 or 4 or more on a tombstone that holds multiple fixtures and have a pallet system on the machine to swap out toomstones and each of thoes flanges on a machine with adequate power and a good cam programer should be down to less than 30 seconds on somthing that simple and it should be compleatly finnished and de burred

As a machinist and Ingenieur (as its spelled in german) i learned " form follows function", today its "proprietary form for functioning a certain time span". I hate that. But a company selling long lasting easy repairable items will bankrupt itself after selling the item to everyone that needs it...and i agree, the designing process was never easier than today as you dont have to worry how to machine that part, cnc will be able to, or wire edm, or whatever. Poor design became popular, no need to pay for good design when you can machine a poor designed part cheap.

yeah its complexity and and quantity that could determine which would be better.

I’m about to start mechanical engineering at university and I’m really glad I watched this video. It’s so true that many parts these days are over engineered making them overpriced and inefficient to produce, and then all of that is masked as ‘good engineering’.

CNC machines can produce a lot of good products, or a operator can create a lot of scrape. We had a whole shift of over bored shifting forks, because the guy, didn't try both ends with the No Go. I checked the Go, all the way through, and both ends, on every single cam, I machined, like a habit. CNC machines are fast, and that can be a bad thing. I noticed slop in the table, when cleaning out the chips. The thrust bearings had worn out. I guess the coordinate machine, was showing it for awhile, and the quality control guy, would come out, and make small adjustments, over time, and not addressing the real issue. When I could push the table, back and forth, 3/8ths of an inch, it was time to order bearings. CNC machines, need maintenance too. Not micro adjustments. Communication is key.

The channel "Peahix" has/had a lot of 16mm film he saved from a college dumpster. He has posted a 16mm film from the films he saved that was made in the 50s by the Monarch Machine Company. Might be worth reaching out to him to see if he still has his 16mm stuff left (he said in the description of the film i mentioned that he might donate everything to a public archive for digitalising as it would involve a lot of effort and that was roughly a year ago). Would be cool to find the original film they showed you in school.

A man whose word is worth something

Well I would 100% agree with you because as a cnc machinist I ONLY have cnc at my disposal I would love a mill over here for quick operations. That being said I cut features on the daily that are smaller than 1mm we use 1mm cutters and 3/32 cutters daily and there's no way youre gonna make any features with that size cutters on a manual mill.

I’m seeing too many it’s either this or that here. Whether to CNC or not is a more comp,ex question=ion. It’s not just the comp,entity of the part, though sometimes it is, or the number of parts, though sometimes it is, but rather the entirety of the operation. For a small shop, such as Howie’s, or something similar, it may be that they will simply not do certain jobs. But large shops it may be a different story. Of course, Howie is talking here of simple CNC. Many modern machines are five or even more axis’s and that work is almost impossible to do manually, even with dividing heads, hydraulic or otherwise, combine that with large numbers of parts and CNC is mandatory. Modern CNC also tends to be more accurate. Programming time can take several days for some highly complex high accuracy parts. But once it’s worked out the results are worth it, again particularly if there is a fair number needed. But all that’s in favor of CNC. There are many reasons why it’s not the best solution, or at least, a necessary one.

I'm of the opinion that the CNC machines are prefered by the corporations mainly because they eliminate the need to properly train and pay machinists. We see the same thing happening in the millwork shops. Eliminating the need to train people also eliminates a lot of their competition.

been operating a lathe and shaper for around 6 years now , one off jobs , repairs , and modification jobs are just alot better suited to manual machinign as well as jobs with poor material quality (like porosity hard spots and welding)

Sure, until you have other jobs to run on other machines. Maybe this is true in R&D and job shops you have low volume. Parallel vs series argument. I don't wait for my laundry to be done before I do the dishes.

Meanwhile my cnc machine with a pallet changer and 71 tool pockets is running a bunch one off parts all night while I'm at home asleep. We've figured out how to do high mix low volume work on cnc machines in the 90s. Manual machines are only really profitable when machining very large parts now days imo.

Agree totally. Poor or mislead engineers have so many items cost so much more than they should

of course cnc and manual will always have their pros and cons, i cant help but think about somthing like a swiss machine when it came to your pin example, even a cam driven swiss machine i feel would be able to do 10k parts more efficiantly then a drill press. of course the specs of the part do matter and not everyone is going to have access to a swiss machine or the expertise to run a cam driven one (i certainly dont).

Manual machinist here with cnc experience. I perfer the old ways... but i do use the cnc for my race car stuff. I have both in my home shop. But i am leaning towards selling my cnc lathe

We have a Makino A71 with a 500 tool magazine.

45yrs in the trade, ran many manual machines back in the day. The parts are far too complex to machine without CNC today. We have been programing at the machine w/computer and powermill software since 1997 and never looked back. Programing is simple and once the machine is running you are programming the next operation. Wouldn't have it any other way. Yes there is still room for a manual lathe and small mill for repairs, other than that, no.

Singles or small batch vs production? No comparison. I'm still using programs on production parts that are 15yrs old. (I have an old cnc and loyal customers.) Also, I have basic programs that I can change a few measurements for basic shapes.

please do a video on lathe tracers

10,000 TOOLS ? You need a computerizied inventory system to find the correct tool for the assigned job (unless your Howee after a couple cups of coffee) ! 😅

Even with multiple drills on a manual machine, it would be a close race with stupid fast CNCs like Fanuc Robodrill or Brother Speedio, running modern carbide drills with 70bar TSC. Those holes look pretty close to 16mm (5/8"), that would give you around 4-4.5k rpm at around 2800rpm at 1750mm/min feed, holes are about 10-12mm deep, that gives you 0.5 second to drill a single hole, so 4 seconds to drill all 8 holes, plus some rapids, on robodrill it would take 2-3 more seconds... Also, the spindle load would peak at around 17-18kw, how much power do those old machines have? Dont get me wrong, manual machines still have their placr in a machine shop, but high volume production has moved on years ago.

Thing the CNC sufficants forget, to write a good program for even a relatively simple program your looking at an hour or more just to write the code, another hour or so to set up, but you save 2 minutes in cycle time... For short run stuff or simple second operations can't beat a manual with a competent machinist. (I've worked with plenty of "programmers" that couldn't write even a simple program in less then 8 hours...) A lot of the programmers I've worked with, were simply good at bull shitting the owners, cause they could navigate microsoft windows or MS-Dos... didn't know a damned thing about machining but they could prattle on about Ram and gigibytes

Nice chat. Engineering obsolescence has taken over the world.

I will add that I sometimes wish that I had some manual machines, because using the CNC lathe that we have as a manual lathe is really horrible.

Most DROs will have a function for walking off a bolt hole pattern. Dividing head is too much work for a simple bolt hole circle

It's as if engineers get paid by the complexity of the part versus the function. They also adjust their speech. For example: The plural for axis is axes. Engineers say: axessees The plural for process is processes. Engineers say processees. I can go on but you get it.

I’ll say it again and again. You choose your machine, I’ll choose mine. Bet I’m quicker, and my choice will be CNC.

Grazie…. Thanks! Great explanation!

This should be described as human engineering vs corporate engineering

Is this Scotty Kilmer's brother?

Oh for the days when motoring was fun, in Britain there are a disproportionate number of traffic enforcement cameras and disproportionately slow speed limits that motoring is no longer fun but a chore.😭😭😭😭

I totally agree with you .

Explorer drill head or Commander drill head ? --Doozer

True craftsman

Yessir preach on. Love it

Threaded bolt patterns is one case where, if doing even just four, it would be super easy to write a code, set up the machine and tools, and blow through the job. And the code is there if you ever get the job again.

Anyone run a machine shop in florida?

same old BS cnc vs manual bashing. I own 2 shops, since 1963. bought 1st cnc mill & lathe in 1999. we use both. manual & cnc. CNC makes us more $$ because 1 man/hour can tend 3 cnc machines making many more parts than 1 man/hour making 1 part on a manual machine. Even with a qty of 1, it is usually faster to program with today's CAD/CAM, and let the cnc make the part unattended, at night while we're closed (aka running lights out). whether cnc or manual, making 1 part takes time - with manual a skilled machinist has to stand on a hard floor in a noisy, cold /hot sometimes dirty shop, close to a dangerous machine spitting hot & sharp shaving or spraying coolant versus a skilled cnc machinist sitting in a clean quiet climate controlled programming the part then loading the mat"l a letting the cnc make the part while he goes to lunch or programs another job... both take about the same time, with cnc churning out a higher quality part 9 out of 10 times. most of my years in the biz were spent on manual machines; we used turrets, indexers, gang drills, special form tools to boost productivity - each is just a progression toward automation, no different than progressing for pen to manual typewriter to electric typewriter to word processor. folks who wish to bash cnc should drag out a manual typewriter, then mail in their complaint, instead of simply sending it via their smart phone. 😂 my company makes high performance cylinder heads for Harley Davidsons. I can manually port & work up a set of heads in about 6 hours. with 1 five axis cnc, including programming, I can produce 5 sets of heads, at a much more affordable price to my customers. cnc vs manual argument has been around since the first NC tape machines were developed for the air-force... it's like arguing about a horse & buggy vs a car. both have their 'place', but there's a reason more people drive cars than buggies...

He looks just like my old chemistry professor ... Dr Doug McIntosh

We have one (cincinnati) that still runs at work today

8:51 well we can just go back to square wheels and round tires. We don't need all that fancy curvy stuff.