Let’s talk religion is an awesome channel for information, they have a great video on Kashmir Shavism but it’s pretty long

Hindutva spreads humanity with all nature 👏

That’s why I like RamaKrishna he was an enlightened being who actively showed all these ways work advaita and Bhakti with Kali. Yes it may seems contradictory but never let the differences of language create fear or dogma against other ways. The truth is the same and beyond differences it’s our job to find it however we please. 🙏

🇮🇳Adi Shankaracharya, Ramkrishna paramhans, Vivekanand, J. Krishnamurti, Acharya Prashant, Rajneesh Osho, are my favourite People. I seek Advait Vedanta philosophy. 🕉️🙏

Om Namo Bhagavathe Vasudevaya. Hari Sarvothama, Vayu Jeevothama. Hare Rama Hare Krishna 🙏

Jay Hari Mauli 🙏❤️🌻

I am Madhwa..Proud to be. Shri Madhwacharya is avatara of Sri Vayu Bhagawan. Dwaitha philosophy is realistic. Many powerful saints came in the lineage of Madwa philosophy. As a Indian, I respect all the thoughts of School.

You guys are amazing. You’ve reached the stage where you can listen and appreciate these highly highly sophisticated theologies of Hindu Dharma. 👏

There are no multiple paths...... there is 1 path and everyone is on it......... The only difference is how far has the seeker come........

Om Shiva Hom Song REACTION!! | Naan Kadavul

In Sanatana dharma there is no absolute reality . Reality is subjective to the seeker .there are different ways to reach the ultimate merging with the light.

u both are just amaging and roger is such a bundle of knowlege ,luv u both so much.

Oh,beautiful painting of Madhvacharya by my teacher, Rajam sir.❤

His explanation is very simplistic and a 5 mins crash course to teach a PHD thesis still with many inaccuracies.

Shakara charya told "Shivo ham" which means we all are Shiva Himself 🙏 Shivo ham 🙏🚩

Awesome discussion Roger! That was very fun and I was looking forward to it considering the repeat dualism argument from Madhava in the video :)

Bhagwan vishnu and all his avatars, it is different from abrahmic religions, Bhagwan vishnu will take form for sake of his bhakta Even in bhagwat geeta, bhagwan says leave all confusions of different paths , and be solely dependent on him alone , he will relieve a jeeva from all bondages

Conclusion: thinking is dvaita and over thinking is Advaita ENjoying is vishitaAdvaita .

The Hare Krishna movement aka the "Brahma Madhva Gaudiya Sampradaya" philosophical school of thought is: Achintya-bhedabheda-tattva refers to the inconceivable oneness and difference of the Supreme Person and His energies. This is one of the key points of theistic philosophy taught by Chaitanya Mahaprabhu. As parts of God's energy, we're also equal in quality with God, but there's a vast difference in quantity. We're each infinitesimal sparks of spiritual energy, and the Supreme Person, Krishna, is the infinite, supreme source of all energies. Some parts of the Vedas say that all beings are one with God, and others say that God is different from all beings. Vedanta philosophers have long argued back and forth about this, but Chaitanya Mahaprabhu taught that both statements are simultaneously true. One and different at the same time, Hare Krsna!

1 - The seeker of knowledge finds devotion and the devotee finds selfless knowledge. Adi Shankaracharya himself wrote a lot many phenomenal devotional hymns. Ramakrishna Paramahansa remained a great devotee of the Goddess in spite of having mastered non-duality. Swami Vivekananda preached the path of knowledge but he rested his devotion entirely on his Guru who insisted he learns Advaita Vedanta. 2 - The difference in interpretation is more in the technical than in the experiential. The word Vishnu in itself means all-pervading. Similarly, the word Krishna means the most spiritually attractive and desirous. The Brahman itself seems to be taken from "Brahmand" - the universe, so may be taken to mean all-encompassing. So, the word in itself is a qualifier to the ultimate non-dual concept.

Om

Just to clarify the Hare Krishna movement is based on the philosophy of "Achintya Bheda Abheda" which is an integration of the dualist (dvaita) philosophy of Madhvacharya and the qualified monism (vishishtadvaita) of Ramanuja. Achintya Bheda Abheda is the core philosophy of the Gaudiya Vaishnava tradition which was founded by Chaitanya Mahaprabhu (1486 - 1534 CE). 🙏

Dvait is path which lead to Advait. Everyone starts with Dvait, but Ultimately only some can achieve Advait. God is not worshipped in Advait,because there is no "two" left in last. There is nothing called you and me. Everything becomes ONE. whom to worship. There exist only ONE.

n Hinduism, there are four main paths by which a follower can reach moksha, or liberation: Bhakti: The path of devotion Gnana: The path of knowledge Karma: The path of selfless service Raja: The royal path of meditation and out of these four krishna said bhakti yoga is the easiest way to liberation. i hope you guys understand because this is from geeta

That is the beauty of the Hinduism sanatan dharma

What Madhavacharya said about Maya is very true that the 'Samsara' or creation itself is not Maya. The definition of Maya(illusion) is anything that takes us away from God or the ultimate reality. And how can the world be an illusion. For better understanding, air conditioners, delicious foods, cars, bungalows, etc are not Maya but our attachment to them takes us away from God. So here 'attachment' to these luxuries is Maya or illusion. We cannot simply say everything around us to be Maya. Because in this world itself there are many saints, pure devotees, pilgrimages, Tulsi Devi etc., but they are not Maya as they take us closer to God.

Hyperquest did a video on these three schools of thought its really good.

Great Sage of Kanchi (Sri Chandrashekarendra Saraswati) - Documentary

Perfectly said by Roger sir.

Hari sarvottam Vayu Jeevauttama

Please do react on Visishtadvaita as well. One of the most unique Vedānta I've ever read

Great video, hyper quest did a similar video on vedantic philosophies you should watch them too. The main reason why both Vishishta advaita and dvaita refuted Sri Shankara's view was that Brahman is not attributeless because experiencing anything is an attribute. Something that has no attribute cannot be experienced itself either. If Brahman is pure and attributeless how it falls under maya and then liberate itself to be with itself. These are the main points they disagreed on.

Greatly informative video

When we look at the overall dharmic schools which includes Bhuddhism, Jainism along with Hinduism (which has several schools) prominently thought moksha as the objective and even there they tried to differentiate one from the other. But all of the schools accepted to Karma theory and that is considered as the bonding factor to a limited body. Essentially what is very key to note is only the karma and getting rid of it is the key message from all these schools. If you start looking at them deeply, every one is actually proposing a workable framework for the practises associated with their school of interpretation. Every path will work as well. Essentially what we have to do is take one school seriously and spend our lifetime and that will lead to a moksha state as defined by the preceptor of that school. The Uppanishads are discussion between sages who actually perceived. But rest of the Acharyas like Sankara, Ramanuja, Madhva etc interpreted that based on their understanding. There will be logical flaws in each arguments as it is all proposed with boundary conditions. When the boundary condition is obliterated then they will fail. But greatness about Dharmic school is none of them would advocate violence for converting others into their school of thought unlike abrahamic schools (which are adharmic schools)

I personally believe in advait vedanta and adi shankara.

Please next video on Vishishtadvaita of Ramanujacharya.

I think Madhava saint saying about this physical form of earth always there it’s not maya. However situations which are happening with us is Maya, Maya like Anger, Lust, desires these are illusions

Let me make certain things clear from my learnings and understandings. 1. Sanatan Dharm is not a religion. The Hindi word for religion is 'Panth' meaning path. Sanatan Dharm is the root and base of the entire existence and not just a way/ path/ religion. So anyone who opposes the Sanatan Dharm opposes the ultimate reality and not just a religion. 2. Siddhartha or Gautam Buddha is not same Buddha who is mentioned in the scriptures as an incarnation of Vishnu. So Buddhism even though originated from Sanatan Dharm does not fully accept the Sanatan Dharm. 3. The 'saar' or the ultimate conclusion of all the scriptures is Vishnu as also stated by the Lord himself. So anyone who is the knower of the Vedas and all the scriptures but does not accept the supreme authority of Vishnu has actually failed to comprehend the scriptures. 4. It is very much okay to worship any god as supreme as per your faith but it is not okay to deny supremacy of Vishnu. For example, in history there were many demons who worshipped other gods as supreme and this is not where they were wrong but they opposed Vishnu which led to their destruction. 5. Moksha or salvation is definitely related to Vishnu because moksha itself means attaining the highest abode(Vaikunth) of Bhagwan Vishnu. Attaining any other realm is not moksha because after living in that realm for a certain time period(based on their merits) they have to rebirth. But on attaining Vaikunth alone, one gets free from the cycle of birth and death. All the scriptures loudly says that moksha can only be attained through devotion or name of Shree Hari. It is true because who else can grant entry to Vishnu's abode except Lord Vishnu himself. Jai Shree Hari 🙏🏻❤

Pramana means "Evidence" its not Knowledge ( Shankara Acharya is the Avatar of Lord Shiva & Ramanuja is Avatar of Lord Vayu 🙏🚩

Very nicely presented in the true form of their respective theosophy. Congratulations and thank you for your efforts in bringing out these Indic philosophies. Yes Brahman is the creator in infinite sense and we are co creators in the finite sense of the world

From Madhavacharya's commentary indirectly points to bramhan which is oneness (Lord Vishnu is ultimate in his case). Once you achieve moksha ultimately u became part of Vishnu. At the end the goal is oneness or nothingness or union or bramhan or non duality or Shiva or Vishnu or Shakti. ❤

React on Acharya Prashant view on Advait and Dvait.❤️

God is called "Brahma" in the Upanishads, who is Brahma? Acharya has given an answer to the question of what is the relationship between him and us? The first of these was Adi Shankaracharya, whose doctrine we call Advaita Vedanta. Shankara says "Brahma satya, jagat mithya" means nirguna brahmin is the only truth except him all mithya and atma and brahma are one and the same. All that remains except the soul is Maya, meaning there is no otherworldly existence or in English it can be called "illusion". Lord (Saguna Brahma), beings, and nature are all illusion, Nirguna Brahman is the only truth. Moksha means union with Nirguna Brahma. Shankara said "Everything is one". The second one is Ramanujacharya who said: Lord, Prakriti and living beings are not illusions but real but living beings and nature are elements of God. "Chit-Achit Vishita Brahma" is his theory that soul (Chit) and Prakriti (Achit) are aspects of Lord Vishnu, there is an eternal distinction between the three things, but both are aspects of the Lord. Moksha means serving Vishnu in Vaikuntha The third one, Madhvacharya, said that like Ramanuja, Vishnu, living beings, and nature are truths, but living beings and nature are not aspects of Vishnu. He declared that Vishnu or Brahma is an independent principle and Prakriti and living beings are independent principles and not an aspect of Vishnu. He said that Pancha Bheda and Discrimination is truth. Shankaracharya said salvation is through knowledge of Brahma, Ramanujacharya and Madhvacharya said salvation is through devotion to Hari. Madhusudana Saraswati, Ramana Maharshi, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa, Swami Vivekananda etc. were followers of Advaita Vedanta. Nathmuni, Vedanta Desika, Pillai Lokacharya etc. were Vishishtadvaita Vedanta followers. Vishvesha Theertha, Vadiraja Theertha, Raghavendra Swami, Vyasa Theertha, Bannanje Govindacharya etc. were followers of Dvaita Vedanta. || Shri Krishnarpanamastu ||

Guys ..HANUMAN trailer is out....please give reaction to it.... literally getting goosebumps

Great channel...I enjoyed the analytical philosophers all from the south . But I still think the Vedas are far into the past and the application of an analytical mind to the revealatory, illuminative and symbolic content of the Upanishads. The Upanishads don't cut up the One reality by calling one transactional and the other Ultimate. Instead it deals with this ordered,regulated consciousness which we call the universe...their light lights up n does not blind.

🙏🙏🙏👍

Hanuman trailer reaction 🎉❤waiting

This is Philosophy war between Lord Vishnu and Lord Shiva Bhakts

According to vedas,upanishad lord vishnu is supreme.

Listen Dammar daak all 5 music video by Aghori muzik it's called Dakla is a traditional form of music which is all about invoking the Almighty Durga Maa in Human body

the wise doesn't argue for dvaita or advaita only one thing which a wise should do is to transcend from dvaita to advaita and then realization

That is not complete information.all these 4 are given title of jagadguru and all you know they have different philosophy and the 5th jagadguru summarize all those philosophy telling all those are true and where it leads and not only he was given the title of jagadguru but jagadguruttam. You have watched his videos and cried and he is also the guru of mukunananda

Please watch HANUMAN TRAILER ❤❤🙏🙏🙏

krishna Kans Vadh movie review please 🥺

Advaita vedanta..was not Shankara's school. .... It was revived by shankara

Pls make a video on Bhavishya Purana ( The future book)

thank you❤

Advaita creates multiple paradoxes, and from those paradoxes arise multiple loops and question marks that cannot be solved by Advaita. Also, if you have deep knowledge of Sanatan Dharma, you can understand that it is somehow disrespecting the core teachings of Vaishnavism, Shaivism, and Shaktism.

🌸

❤

Guys guys emergency new Hanuman trailer was released I think you guys definitely love it in last there is a lord Hanuman will be shown I want to see your reaction please watch it ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

Adwait Is the best . ❤

It's just plato vs Aristotle they both argued against each other as they were disciple guru too these two also argued for no reason as their experiences were limited god is god no vishnu holds it god is above vishnu and he is just a role player too like us for maintenance of this uni

Hey Roger and sebrina .... Do you want to read some notes on indian philosophy. As you know reading books on philosophy can be really challenging because of their complex nature . But I can send you some small notes that can help you in a better understanding of indian philosophy. In general there are 6 orthodox and 3 unorthodox philosophies that are mostly talked about.

Please read "Shakthi Vishistaa Dyvatha" by Shree RenukaCharya

🙏🙏🙏❤️

*

You seems to create doubt after hearing advaitvad and davaitvad ( non duality and duality)..pls go thorough properly because both are same Vishnu or Krishna or one Almighty is same ...you seek him by gyan yoga or bhakti yoga...you can be one with Almighty or you can choose to be independent with Almighty and serve him in transcendental way also.. It's individual free will what way he want to choose...this unique philosophy in santan dharam...

Madhvacharya does not say Vishnu is the One Supreme God in the sense of Abrahamic faiths. He says Vishnu is One Supreme God only because of the definition of what Vishnu means. The main definition is "All Pervading". And this characteristic is of that of the One Supreme Brahman. Similarly, Madhvacharya breaks down the Vishnu Sahasranama (1000 names of Vishnu) that was chanted by Bhishma to Emperor Yudhishtira wherein he explains each and every word signifies Vishnu's greatness and how it is an attribute of God himself. Then he goes on to say that every word in the Veda is glorifying Vishnu himself and proves that through various Pramanas. The video, though good in making a broad point on Tattavada/Dvaita Vedanta be known, was very much incomplete. The only way to understand Dvaita Vedanta/Tattvavada is to study the book "Philosophy of Madhvacharya" by Dr BNK Sharma. It is also false that it Dvaita Vedanta is not as scholarly as Advaita. Rather, for it to demolish Advaita, Madhvacharya had to be extremely scholarly, more so than regular Advaitins. Because all converts to Dvaita were top most Advaitin scholars only. Whereas you won't find any case of Dvaitin converting to Advaita. And the person who made the video also got another fact wrong: Madhvacharya did not have disagreements and "leave" his teacher/Guru. Rather his Guru and Madhvacharya had a long debate on the flaws of Advaita, with the Guru (his name was Achyutapreksha) accepting Dvaita and rejecting Advaita. I feel there is a lot of bias among Advaitins (or people who like Advaita in general) who either don't present facts as is or tend to twist facts. I mean these are recorded events. How can one get this so wrong??? Anyways it doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things. Just wanted to make you aware that the video does not do full justice to Dvaita Vedanta. Saying this as a follower/practictioner of Dvaita. Lots of issues in the video but it did an okay job.

Please reaction #Hanuman trailer

He was the fanatic evangelical equivalent of India

Just to clarify these philosophies do not actually contradict each other as this body-mind we and god are completely different and we are his children as the jiva we are parts of god and he is the complete infinite But as the atman(the supreme self/brahman) we and god are identical

Sanantan Dharma is not a religion it is rather a university..where in Vedanta scholars researched on spirituality, ayurveda, mathematics, astronomy, cosmolgy etc. Just like modern day scientists write research papers and their research also gets challenged, our vedantic scholars are like them..ultimately we are santanis are the truth seekers and not some dogma believers

Hanuman trailer has been released please react to the trailer.thank you

Word "Vishnu" means "pervading everything",

if you see explaining by Shankracharya ji Plz do.. we dont want to read history from other foreign channel as here, u know people have BIAS.. Cant take all here in this Video as Legit.. No hate, keep going as strong guys..

Seems now you are on the real path - 'Seeking knowledge'- That is the Hindu/Sanatan way Now you see how there are different contradicting theories, philosophies, whys to seek knowledge and the ultimate truth (that no one knows) - Still Hindus learn to appreciate and accept all these contradicting ways to the ultimate truth (as per the Vedas, there is only Brahman - the ultimate truth and Atman or the one seeking that truth) Wonderful how democratic a religion (?) can be

Nothing is certain but death and God

Roger🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡 You got lot of knowledge man. Respect 😊 Agree with your thoughts 👍 keep it up

I loved VIshishtadvaita more than dvaita.

Hanuman movie officel trailer reaction ....please 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻 Jay Sri Ram

In bhagbat Gita Krishna already said what u want u will get. Madhavachary emphasizes more on baikhuntha. So only way in kali yuga is bhakti. Bc ppl doesn't have time. So pls don't compare with abhramic religion. 😊

Adhvaita and buddism are same with little different wordings.

This video explanation does a lot of disservice to Madhwacharya ji. He was not Abrahamic or fanatic by any measure. He never even mentioned Shankaracharya's name in his works. In fact, he said that diversity is a fact of life and that as long as there are thinking human beings, there will always be diversity of philosophies, sects, arguments, counter-arguments etc. And he said it is natural for a person to feel close association to the sect he is born into. What he also said is that Moksha is possible through the other paths. He never invalidated them. He just established his own Darshana. Madhwacharya also said that all the letters in all the languages of the world are epithets of Vishnu. So whether you call him Allah, Christ, Vishnu, Durga, Shiva etc. does not matter. The Madhwa sect largely keeps to itself. It has never proselytized or sought to convert anyone. It is just confined to a few South Indian states. Madhwa ji has always been very respectful.

Hello mam hanuman movie ka trailer is out now pls react on it

💙😌🫶🙏🏻

Advait seem more logical to me. So I am Seeker of Advait.

23:50 I also feel the same, dwaita vedanta is similar to abrahamic religions.

Full of False Information. First of all Shankara never made 'Advaita'. It's present in Vedas. On the contrary dvaita is not even mentioned in Vedas and Purnas. The video is made by a Madhva sect followers and thus contains many biases. The interpretation of the Upanishads are simple not possible and only Advaita philosophy of Braham is present in Hinduism. This interpretation business happened very late in 13th century. All other sects like Shaivism , Shaktism, Ganapatism , Suryaism are advait followers because it's the only philosophy. But only in vaishanav sect , people started to interpret the Vedas for their sectarian purposes. Beware of such interpretations.

Nxt kashmir shaivism

madwas worship all vedic gods but supreme is vishnu.

A spritual talk by non-enlightened being or a regular human being. At least learn spritual paths videos from People who are on path, gurus, saints or priests. They are our best bets.

Parbraham parameshwar ( Shiv , Sadashiv , Iswer ,devo ke dev Mahadev ) Godfather Parbraham Shiv om namah shivay.

You actually, misunderstood it to a very great extent. See, the only way to understand these complex philosophies is to talk to a Guru.

One think should be clear. In wholesomeness of parbhram (beyond infinite god), advait is only truth. Advait is essence of Vedas. Sanatan does not exist without vedas. Vedas are only truth. Ramanuj was ved virodhi and hence cannot be considered as vedic scholar. The sampradays are again not representation or divisions of vedic Shakas. Hence this video you watched is useless.

Both are the same actually, it's just emotions and knowledge.

Great Sage of Kanchi (Sri Chandrashekarendra Saraswati) - Documentary

the wise doesn't argue for dvaita or advaita only one thing which a wise should do is to transcend from dvaita to advaita and then realization