She’s a predator.

She practically smiles during the whole documentary. She is definitely missing a few bolts 🙄

I’m a nurse and work with people that have challenges like this young man. This woman ain’t right

Anyone who defends her should know the following - Her victim was having nightmares during the time she was “making love” to him - He was left with scars on his body from her - He is on medication to this day because of her - He repeatedly tried to move away from her when she first kissed him according to *her* testimony - He has been repeatedly assessed as having Severe Intellectual Disability throughout his life - It’s the consensus of the Scientific and Medical Community that FC is bogus Anyone who still defends her should be ashamed

There’s no remorse because she openly admits she believes “I committed no crime”. If Anna was a man guaranteed she would have punished way more harshly for this crime. She’s the definition of a predator.

I don’t believe she understands the gravity of her actions. You don’t sleep with a patient period! You don’t take advantage of others with disabilities!

I watched the Netflix documentary, and the first question I immediately had was: How did Derrick even know the alphabet, or how to put a sentence together. Nothing made sense.

I can't imagine how her ex-husband feels about this.

She only served 2 years. Just imagine if it was a man that did this to a woman 🤬

Anna is a monster.

What a weirdo! Just watched the documentary on Netflix. On top of everything else, she was a married woman. Yuk!!

They gave this women entirely too much time to speak during the documentary & failed to do the same for the mother or even D’Man for what it’s worth. They should have allowed the mother to explain how demonic & nefarious this behavior was, but the documentary sought to humanize the monster.

How did this sick woman get on Netflix.

Why is she smiling 🤢

This demon took advantage of Derrick and his family. I was sick to my stomach watching the documentary. I wish I had not seen the documentary because it made me so upset. The fact that she only served 2 years makes it even worse 😡

How can they let this woman who is not a victim to talk on the documentary Criminals are living better than us

I just came from watching the full documentary 😢

Smirking the entire time. Twisted devil

She is crazy she is a monster 👹

The mother and brother thought Derrick was able to attend college and get a degree??? Out of nowhere he could understand lectures, read and write?? Come on. Why was any of this allowed to happen? It is sickening on so many levels.

My only question is, who wrote the term paper? The girl hired to help him had no stake writing it herself, so who wrote it? Seems like her testimony was completely ignored! I believe the baby was thrown out with the bath water in this case! Now, no one is even attempting to communicate with him anymore, smh. . .

She does not even call him Derrick. Just dman ans she does not even say that right

Bonkers and her parents both psychologists I believe warped her mind into thinking she had like super mind powers !

Whyyyyy on earth does anyone think she’s sane when she’s smiling through this whole thing?? She is sick 🤢

It is horrible that she has not ever taken accountability for her behavior . This happened a few years ago and she still says she did "nothing wrong".... Ugh! I simply can not with her.... lies and more deceit . She clearly shows she has No moral compass and it's disgusting. She not only ruined a family that was seeking her help but she tore her own family apart as well.... her ex husband told the court that she is a narcissist and I would have to agree . The damage she has done to both families will not ever be undone and her children will grow up raised by their dad in a safe loving home knowing what their mother is capable of ....she knows No shame . If it were up to me she would not only have lost her teaching license but she would have to re enter society as a sexual predator . She is Very lucky that she gets to work at her home. She got off lighter than I would have been toward her but then again I am not her judge or jury . I just know right from wrong. Thank you for your channel

Sick stuff

She was a monster!!!

the whole FC debate: if you do the research you'll see it has been debunked many times over: it is the facilitator typing, every, single, time. why its still promoted i have no idea, especially when things like teaching people how to use AAC devices , sometimes with adaptive buttons, eye gaze, etc. to communicate spontaneous and autonomously.

Would you concede that if irrefutable evidence proving that Derrick is in fact aware, intelligent, and having agency, that he could then, also provide consent? This is the crux of the situation-is, or is not, Derrick an intelligent mind with agency? If yes, then the entire debate ends. If no, then we still have a debate-Anna’s true intentions. To be clear-if we could prove Anna’s intentions were indeed false, deceptive, selfish, and predatory, then she should suffer the complete consequences of such actions. The documentary however, provides much evidence to the contrary, namely Derrick’s papers and other revealed data messages from the electronic keyboard, the testimony of Devva Kasnitz, as well as the personal testimony of Anna’s herself. Let us remember also, that the family is refusing to release the entirety of the text data stored in the keyboard. Currently, there is compelling evidence showing that no, Derrick is not intelligent, does not have agency, and could not provide consent (as seen later in the documentary). It does not, however, prove Anna’s intent. It does not prove her to be a narcissist, “white savior,” seeking power and control over a severely mentally disabled man. It can both be true that Derrick could not provide consent, and that Anna could have believed otherwise (even if mistaken). In other words, Anna was perhaps well-intentioned, but gravely mistaken. This would imply that Anna’s, yet unproven, influence over the facilitated communications was perhaps subconscious and unintentional. This is quite a stretch. I concede that this seems implausible, but arguably quite possible, given the scientific consensus on the psychology of the human mind (namely bias, self-deception, illusion of Self, etc.). The documentary certainly provides compelling evidence that Anna was, maybe, well-intentioned. I believe the initial court ruling was the best decision possible, given the available evidence. The most conclusive being the testimony or deposition of Dr. Howard C. Shane. He met with Derrick, and Derrick was unable to demonstrate intelligence, beyond that of an infant, essentially. After the separation from Anna, Derrick was suddenly unable to communicate. He could no longer utilize the facilitated communication technique using the electronic keyboard. This is confounding. How could this possibly be, unless everything with Anna was falsified-unless Anna was in fact influencing his communications? Or perhaps Anna was outright in control of his every word, one typed letter at a time. Much evidence however, points to Derrick being the one in control; namely the actual, literal words used, the sentence structures, the perspective, and the fact that it wasn’t always Anna facilitating. So was this a conspiracy with the other facilitator? Doubtful. But again, why then could Derrick suddenly no longer communicate??? If he is truly intelligent, with agency, why wouldn’t he defend himself? Why wouldn’t he choose to communicate with his own mother and brother? This would also seem doubtful. So is Derrick intelligent or not? If Anna was so incredibly intelligent enough to fake all the communication data on the keyboard, and conspire with others, with ill-intent, why then would she be so foolish as to encourage Derrick to disclose the “loving relationship,” the sexual intercourse? How would that benefit her in any way? Surely she wouldn’t, as a predator, have willingly confessed to her crimes? This is confounding and so difficult to make any sense out of. Can anyone explain this, aside from asserting that she is a manipulative, narcissistic mastermind, with the desire to leave her marriage and openly continue a long term relationship with Derrick? How can this be explained? So how could this be resolved? Only one way-prove conclusively that Derrick is in fact an intelligent mind with self awareness and agency. How can we do this? By reuniting Anna with Derrick, under strict, clinical supervision, with the support of the family, and using a third party facilitator for the facilitated communication (the use of the electronic keyboard). This will never occur however, so the argument is moot. We will never know and therefore we must all remain agnostic. Any other conclusion, although seemingly reasonable, is unfounded and unprovable. The most frustrating component of this story is the fact (as shown in the documentary) that Derrick was supposedly, intelligently communicating via facilitated communication for a period of time, and then suddenly, apparently, unable to do so after revealing his relationship with Anna, and subsequently his mother and brother disowning and separating Anna and Derrick indefinitely. My theory is that, perhaps, just maybe, the mother and brother’s complete disownment and separation of Anna and Derrick was in itself a severe traumatic experience for Derrick, resulting in an unknown, and likely unknowable, cognitive and emotional response from Derrick. Imagine, please, if he really does have some form of advanced intelligence and agency, that of an adult, and he seemed to have, miraculously, found love, a loving relationship with a woman who cared deeply for him, and suddenly it was taken away from him. How could his mind respond? Would this be a severe trauma, to have this all taken away from him? Perhaps by shutting down and becoming further dysfunctional, regressing, perhaps rebelling against his family, perhaps by suffering from a special, or unique case of PTSD? How would this trauma impact his already unique mind? This is a theory, admittedly difficult for most people to understand, and perhaps quite esoteric, requiring a thorough knowledge of psychology, trauma, and mental illness, as well as an open mind. To be clear, I am not asserting this to be true, but only asking the question if it might be true. Might Derrick actually be an intelligent, self-aware mind with agency, hopes, dreams, and a chance at a better, meaningful existence? Sadly, we will never know. Certainly Anna made a critical misjudgment in engaging with Derrick physically. She made a serious mistake. Regardless, she must be, and perhaps already has been, held accountable for these grave errors. However, there is not enough conclusive evidence to outright declare that Derrick is in fact severely mentally retarded and unable to consent. What if Derrick is intelligent, but suffering from a complex case of PTSD from the trauma of losing Anna? Could this be possible? Unlikely, I admit, and moot, as we will never know, but there is too much compelling evidence that Derrick might actually be intelligent. I do not side with Anna. I do not forgive her behavior. I have compassion and sympathy for Derrick’s family. But I also have hope for Derrick, and tremendous fear and sadness that he may truly be an intelligent man, trapped in perpetual despair and unfathomable suffering, unable to ever defend himself or recover, unable to express himself, unable to even find any relief. What is his current quality of life? What would it have been if he were able to continue his apparently loving relationship with Anna? Was it so bad that Anna loved him? Was it so bad that Derrick was attending classes and, as shown in the documentary with a third party facilitator, able to write intelligent thoughts? I am an advocate for Derrick Johnson.

Gross

It's always women like this..,

Dman in the background just on another planet

What’s the documentary called? Where can I watch it?

Netflix should be ashamed of their documentary. They truly allowed her to speak about her abuse as if it were a love story. She is rapist and a sociopath.

She looks repellent.

I didn’t see remorse either.. if she was so bored in her marriage then she should have found another way to deal .. you don’t rape a disabled person

Insane

The case was overturned and to prevent Stubblefield receiving compensation she had to plead to a lesser crime to justify the two years she served.

No worries, his brother will never have sex again 😢

She was talking to herself, there is something definitely wrong with her

That’s one perspective.

It's to distance herself from her behavior on him

Her driveway does not go all the way to the end of the street! I know these seem like small matters but the fact that Anna changed the mother's radio and saying Dman loves wine "trust me it was all about CONTROL" so unethical to have a sexual relationship with a non verbal adult.

I just finished watching the Netflix documentary on this, with first person commentary from all involved. Well, all except for Derrick. Anna Stubblefield is a psychotic woman. She is so sick that she still, to this very day, thinks she did nothing wrong. And to hear that she hadn't even sent a letter to apologize even if it had to be through attorneys, just convinces me of her complete narcissistic and sick ways.

She’s not well. Delusional.

So literally did she give him the nickname DMAN or was that really true because no one use that as anything! And she literally calls him that through the whole interview. I am interested to know what they would say about that. Not much evidence about the nickname. 🤨

Idk man the whole situation is weird but very interesting. Definitely pros and cons to the situation. If he was able to type a whole essay about a book without help from Anna then maybe he was able to communicate on the Neo. It’s very controversial so that is all i will say.

So grown disabled me can never have sex? They don't have desires? No one could ever want to be with someone like him . If he didn't consent, why did aroused ? Why did he miss it ? They didn't show his heartbreak after mom separated them . Ppl are judging from their own perspective.. no one ever know those 2..

caso isolado

I do actually think the mother wants him to be disabled.It's her child she doesn't want to let him grow up.I've seen Mother's do that with sons.In prison they don't want them to have a girlfriend or anything.It's very strange

She doesn't look remorseful at all.but I had a girl force herself on me in Highschool and I wasn't scared by it at all.

There are many problems with her defence. Firstly love does not overcome every and any social or legal hurdles, buddhists like to categorise what true love is. She has no proof he loved her except claiming he used the FV accidentally which is very bizarre in case he cannot even articulate what love is. Secondly, even if she gains consent, verbally or written, sex act is a different matter, a paid sex worker can definitely do a better job than her??

I’m not defending her actions but clearly she shouldn’t have had a romantic relationship with him, but what if he really was talking thru the typing thing and could actually talk did they have other people help him with the typing or were they just saying he wasn’t capable so she could control him and have him to herself how do people know the mom wasn’t abusing him? She changed his diapers and took him a bath? He looked a lot different when he was with Anna acted happy and the mom took it all away so he could depend on her, and she didn’t like he was pleasuring himself I’m sure he was before she just never did it, I have 2 boys and they do that since they were 12/13 it’s a part of life, I think it was a major issue w her being of another race, if she was his same color bet they wouldn’t have had much of an issue, I feel bad for him that they took his Type machine Away and didn’t let him go back to what he was doing and just sent him back to being a child he probably rebelled and got depressed , she shouldn’t have crossed her boundaries and she should have gotten someone else to help him, now he’s back to square one poor guy I think they should give him something to communicate I’ve seen a young girl w very bad autism and was almost like this young man use it to communicate on Facebook and wrote her own book I don’t think they shouldn’t not allow people to use the FC

I find this situation to be sad and confounding. I am quite familiar with trauma disorders, through personal experience. From my perspective, I am wondering if perhaps Anna formed a special bond with Derrick that allowed him to open up and to communicate. There is a lot of convincing and compelling evidence indicating that Derrick truly is an intelligent adult with agency, deep thought, emotions, etc. There is also compelling evidence that Derrick is severely mentally retarded. However, I have a theory as to how these two seemingly contradictory conclusions can both seem to be true at the same time. I still have hope that Derrick is intelligent, and here is my case: the mother and brother’s disownment and complete separation of Derrick and Anna was in itself a severe trauma to Derrick, rendering him to essentially shut down. There is also a very simple way to prove this theory-reunite Anna with Derrick, under strict supervision, and utilize a third party facilitator to hold Derrick’s arm, and see what happens. Allow Anna and Derrick to repair and reforge their special bond, their loving connection. This, sadly, will likely never happen, and I cannot help but to feel terrible sadness for Derrick. His is a very sad, lonely existence. The most intriguing part of this documentary is this apparent failed facilitated communication once Anna was disowned and separated from Derrick. Why could he suddenly no longer use the keyboard? It seems as if he was never able to, and that Anna was, perhaps inadvertently, influencing his typing. However, it seemed, almost conclusively, that this was not the case-the best evidence being the papers written by Derrick during his African American Literature course. These papers were written with the assistance of a third party that was not familiar with the course subject matter. How else could this be explained, other than Derrick being an intelligent agent? Secondly, the records saved on the electronic keyboard, partially shared in the documentary, also (strongly) suggest intelligence and agency. It is quite interesting that this data transcript was not admissible in the original court case. Even more interesting, Anna’s conviction was overturned, because of this obvious mistake on the part of the court. The recorded data on that keyboard must be quite compelling, and I wish that it would be made public. Obviously the family is holding on to this tightly, as it would destroy their desired narrative and prosecution. Shame on the family. Shame. So why then is Derrick suddenly no longer able to utilize facilitated communication? As stated above, I argue that perhaps his mother and brother, disowning and separating Anna, was in itself, a severe trauma to Derrick, and his family was essentially saying “No Derrick, you are not a free man, you are not intelligent, you are not allowed to have your own life, you are not allowed to live and love outside of our preferred, benighted existence. You, Derrick, are simply retarded and unintelligent. No woman could ever love you.” This, I argue, could explain his sudden inability to communicate. Another interesting aspect to this story is that Anna, is clearly well-intentioned, and clearly she did (and perhaps still does) love Derrick. She loved this man, despite his severe disabilities. She did not groom Derrick. She did not encourage secrecy in any way. She has been, and still is, an open book. She encouraged Derrick to inform his family of the relationship. If Anna was looking to take advantage of Derrick, this would simply not have been the case. She would have encouraged secrecy and she likely would have denied everything and lied. How can anyone assume ill intent? Why would she tell the mother and brother about the relationship? Why? Someone, please, explain this to me. It’s nonsense. It’s devastating. Again, my argument is that the mother and brother’s decision to disown and separate Derrick and Anna was in itself a severe trauma. Imagine how this would affect his already feeble mind? It would be devastating. Enough, perhaps, to inhibit his ability to communicate via facilitated communication. I wish and hope, in futility, for Anna to reunite with Derrick, under strict supervision, and that perhaps once and for all we can discover the true ability and person that is Derrick Johnson.

I do like her hair.....and i think that he definitely was for it....but she knew good and damn well what she was doing

She like da muhdik!

This was as much about race. The brother mentions the colour of her skin in every other sentence. This case is shameful. They should have allowed the victim to demonstrate how he communicates in court.

My son is autistic, he met a woman that has shaken baby syndrome. Her family made it known I will pay for them to see one another, that they will always have custody, and I will never take away their 1,000 a month that they get for watching her. I would have had to pay them!!!! People do things for themselves. Derrick went from becoming intellectual to regressing? No. The mom and brother 100% told him what to do, say, and act. If the family could support themselves and not use him as a cash cow. They took away his only way to communicate! They are monsters. It is heartbreaking. Anna is nieve if she didn’t see this family was not going to give up any control, I have seen it personally. Money is the root of all evil. If you love my son, then move in with me and love him, autistic or not. That is how the family should have embraced her.