Marbury v. Madison, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Required Cases]

Рет қаралды 338,556

Күн бұрын

GET FOLLOW-ALONG NOTEGUIDES for this video: bit.ly/3XMSawp
AP HEIMLER REVIEW GUIDE (formerly known as the Ultimate Review Packet):
+AP Gov Heimler Review Guide: bit.ly/3rfXr2Y
Additional HEIMLER REVIEW GUIDES (formerly known as Ultimate Review Packet):
+AP US History: bit.ly/44p4pRL
+AP World History: bit.ly/46rfHH1
+AP European History: bit.ly/3PCPyiw
+AP Essay CRAM Course (DBQ, LEQ, SAQ Help): bit.ly/3XuwaWN
HEIMLER’S HISTORY MERCH! / @heimlershistory
Tiktok: @steveheimler
Instagram: @heimlers_history
Heimler's History DISCORD Server: / discord
In this video Heimler walks you through Marbury v. Madison which, in addition to being a required Supreme Court case for your AP Government curriculum, is probably the most important case in Supreme Court history.
It was this case, decided by the Marshall Court, that cemented the Court's power of judicial review which is the power to rule on the constitutionality of laws passed by Congress (in addition to other actions of the federal government).
Though it began as a case about William Marbury suing for a judgeship, it became a far larger and farther reaching case about the jurisdiction and power of the highest Court in the land.

Пікірлер: 129

@gabe9452 2 ай бұрын

AP Gov exam at 7:30 in the morning tomorrow. Figured it was about time to start studying.

@combine8269 2 ай бұрын

3 hours earlier to it than me

@gabe9452 2 ай бұрын

@@combine8269 just in spite of you I am gonna stop studying, I take it as a challenge.

@cyceryx 2 ай бұрын

ayyyy same

@CsoCool259 2 ай бұрын

Same here, just reviewing this case specifically, because it's confusing asf

@TheCarGuyy 2 ай бұрын

💀I just started

@colindalangin2925 2 жыл бұрын

Absolutely carrying me through this class. Not trying to read the text book, my ADHD mind learns way better from this type of fast fun teaching

@artfimbres576 Жыл бұрын

Me too. My ADHD learns better through these videos. Couldn't read books very well...

@ClarkPotter 2 жыл бұрын

This dude's the AP Gov teacher you want. If school were taught at this pace and with this enthusiasm I'd have been invested a lot more.

@middleway1885 Жыл бұрын

Imagine the possibilities that can arise if people actually found out what they passionately enjoy doing, and not be limited by the financial aspects... you know that pesky 'adulting'... Can you believe we follow a broken system because others said it is needed to be that way... lol Or because it's been done for this long... sad days are coming faster and faster; when many more will lose their ways of living the way they did... I'm for people to have a safe and comfortable home, people being more self-reliant in their food stuff by planting freely food forests everywhere... it's crazy we still have to pay crazy high prices for the basic utilizes... when it can be just at: maintenance fees, material costs (which they would get discounts on), and donation based to support those that bring more streamline services... plus, this retirement plan is crap... people think they will have any money left after they break wall street... lol, What a trip... how about people creating NFTs so others can support their mentors/ people that brought them Blissful experiences... easy fix... Education wouldn't be this broken system but from the mindset of; what brings one interest (passionate people sharing 'Show and Tell') Shadowing professionals and having people record for those that can't be live, there... everything is top quality... Easy fix for this reality...

@sunshinewing5517 7 ай бұрын

agreeee

@knewyoudhauntallofmywhatifs Жыл бұрын

i'm in law school and while i generally understood this case, i didn't understand the significance. this video helped me fully understand it. thank you!!!

@Jacob-pv8sr Жыл бұрын

maybe you shouldn't be a lawyer..

@knewyoudhauntallofmywhatifs Жыл бұрын

@@Jacob-pv8sr lol come stop me coward

@cyceryx 2 ай бұрын

@@Jacob-pv8sr what are you gonna do, sue them?

@mochabroka 2 жыл бұрын

I have a quiz with this tomorrow, but for APUSH!! This video is a miracle 0-0 Thanks for carrying me through APWH!! I was bound to fail the exam but watching your reviews and livestreams helped me pass with last minute study

@heimlershistory 2 жыл бұрын

I remain, your humble servant…

@mochabroka 2 жыл бұрын

@@heimlershistory hahaha!!

@nerdbot6450 2 жыл бұрын

Taking my AP Gov test tomorrow thank you for this!

@nexongn 2 жыл бұрын

Yeah me too 😔

@YoungKingAK 2 жыл бұрын

Same🙏🏻

@laineeh.7569 2 жыл бұрын

Bruh completely same

@eligarcia4981 2 жыл бұрын

These cases are the first review I have done lol AND I have chem tmrw!

@laineeh.7569 2 жыл бұрын

@@eligarcia4981 I'm so glad someone else is going through my pain.

@eliasschock6571 Жыл бұрын

Your energy makes me actually interested so thank you for really putting your heart into your teaching

@rubyguan7974 Жыл бұрын

YOU KNOW HOW MANY VIDEOS I WATCHED TO TRY TO UNDERSTAND THIS CASE BEFORE I FINALLY WATCHED YOURS AND YOU EXPLAINED IT PERFECTLY

@liawengert8784 Жыл бұрын

Thank you Heimler this case has always been confusing to me but you explained it so well and in an engaging way :')

@PCAMY 2 жыл бұрын

I partially understood these cases but these videos connected the dots for me. I also love your sense of humor lol

@mariaconstantino08 Жыл бұрын

I watched 3 videos prior to yours, and your video made me understand the topic. Thank you!

@MrJoeybabe25 Жыл бұрын

WOW! Great simple explanation that I've been trying to wrap my head around. I think I've got it now. Thank you very much! 😀😀

@carly2518 2 жыл бұрын

thank you, this video really clearified every thing I needed to know :)

@cocoa7295 2 ай бұрын

See yall on the other side after the exam in 7 hours, WE’RE GONNA GET FIVES RAHHHH

@zavierwiley571 21 күн бұрын

What did you get? (I didn't take it I'm here because I'm taking gov online over the summer to get it out of the way)

@LloydBryanMolanderAdams 2 жыл бұрын

Great breakdown of the IRAC here - well done, best video out there!

@seanowens01 2 жыл бұрын

Been a few years, thanks for the quick refresher.

@Kaitlyn.Ashby04 2 жыл бұрын

I am in fact using the term “Ol’ sneaky Adams” to remember what case this is haha

@scholarwork6060 2 жыл бұрын

Adams Hamilton and Washington were heroes, Jefferson was a radical Jacobin that pretended to promote "equality."

@gradychapman3511 Жыл бұрын

Thank you, very helpful. Good definition of writ of mandamus

@najma-honeyyusoph5082 11 ай бұрын

Very well explained wow. i hope you continue making contents like this.

@chelseab4870 Жыл бұрын

I see your Landscape of History by John Gaddis poster! Excellent book. Thanks for everything Heimler!

@heimlershistory Жыл бұрын

Good eye! Yeah, that’s one of my absolute favorites.

@madelinevlogs5898 11 ай бұрын

Thanks for this! I’ve been out of high school for a while but this is great for my constitutional law class

@cynthialeveque6606 11 ай бұрын

Thanks for explaining that so well.

@LiyaGuerrero Жыл бұрын

Thank you so much for this video!

@Jaja-rt2ux 2 жыл бұрын

Oh my gosh thank you, this is the only video I could understand

@taureanbelle9769 Жыл бұрын

Thank you! Have a better understanding

@Mc_Logic 2 жыл бұрын

Damn, I just had a quiz on this today! I had to watch the one from 3 years ago! Where did the old intro go Heimler? 😂

@anzatzi 2 жыл бұрын

Well presented!

@marijav9557 2 жыл бұрын

I needed this vid, thanks

@heimlershistory 2 жыл бұрын

Yep. Glad it helped…

@zainy_inc154 9 күн бұрын

That sneaky Jefferson bit was funny asf 😂

@darelbutler3953 5 ай бұрын

Wonderfully said!

@user-zx9nh4mg4h 10 ай бұрын

How did you know some of us needed to watch it more than once? Great explanation

@Crosseyedhero 2 жыл бұрын

This helps a lot. Thank you.

@nanasakvarelidze9148 2 жыл бұрын

I mean... Singlehandedly THE best explanation of this case.

@momoelmeligi3478 Жыл бұрын

1L law student here and this video was essential for my understanding of the case. Thank you!

@user-pe7qb8bo8r 5 ай бұрын

Can't believe somebody could make it all this easy thankyou for the help with my studies 😍 **subscribing**

@Call_Me_Rio Жыл бұрын

Thank you. This was a very educational video.I enjoyed every 18:15 seconds of it

@ogunsheadeyinka9661 2 жыл бұрын

good job. best video ever

@armandoperez8761 2 жыл бұрын

Do you have a video on Plessy v. Ferguson case??

@SandwedgeMon 5 ай бұрын

Thank you!

@user-uf8yw4hy7v 2 жыл бұрын

Man, you are amazing

@FollowerofDuck Жыл бұрын

i love ur energy

@averagehooligan620 Жыл бұрын

you know it's a good vid when the explanation is better than chatGPT's answer

@-paul-2191 Жыл бұрын

Man, thanks to you I'm #1 in the class. Appreciate it man

@gloriaflomo4838 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you for the Unstanding

@oakus8503 2 жыл бұрын

Great video! It’s too bad these videos are only getting a few hundred fews on each, though.

@heimlershistory 2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, but this is a new subject for my channel. I’ve got to earn my space like anyone else. We’ll get there. In the meantime, let any AP Gov-ers know that the videos are there for them…

@stankyt5882 2 жыл бұрын

@@heimlershistory oh dw I'll be back next year for AP Gov but I'm catching up on APUSH, my schools on period 6 and we're about halfway through

@uraveragepianist7566 4 ай бұрын

@@heimlershistorythis aged incredibly well. Thanks for everything!!!

@Yodakaycool 6 ай бұрын

@madeleinedombrowski9913 6 ай бұрын

even as a law student this was really helpful :) thanks for the video

@strawhatchoji2535 2 жыл бұрын

possibly the most difficult one was on my argumentative essay. Nice 🤦🏾‍♂️

@aidenjoly639 7 ай бұрын

Your the goat fr

@MrJoeybabe25 Жыл бұрын

Did the Court also rule as it did, and not order the writ because Madison would have ignored it and they would have looked foolish? Or is it simply not provided for in the text of Article Three in which Section 2 gives the Supreme Court original jurisdiction when ambassadors, public officials, or the states are a party in the case, leaving the Supreme Court with appellate jurisdiction in all other areas to which the federal judiciary's jurisdiction extends. Could Marshall have reasonably ordered Madison to deliver the Writ of Mandamus?

@xforce3648 2 жыл бұрын

So the Supreme Court ended up giving itself more power of judicial review from this case. That’s both interesting and terrifying!

@tunaXD_ 2 ай бұрын

So because Justice Marshall found a law unconstitutional due to it colliding with Article III, therefore putting it out of their original jurisdiction, and declared it as so, despite it being part of a law once passed by Congress. Marshall said it was unconstitutional despite no power being given to the Supreme Court to do so. But no one really came to argue with that so Chief Justice Marshall pretty much gave the power of judicial review to the Court based on what the federalists were arguing in the Federalist Papers on the idea of checks and balances, and more specifically Federalist 51 and 78. And no one has really came to argue against the power (and they really can't do that either because that was the idea the federalists had for the judicial branch in Federalist 78 and by extension Federalist 51). I think I got it?

@aK-qi9lp 28 күн бұрын

Question: Was the ruling because Marbury's case shouldn't have technically fallen under original jurisdiction and therefore Marshall couldn't issue a writ of mandamus? Or did Marshall just rule that the writs of mandamus portion of the Judiciary Act of 1802 was unconstitutional and get rid of it?

@coltx1513 2 жыл бұрын

Heimler I have a test tomorrow you think I can ace it?

@heimlershistory 2 жыл бұрын

Heck yes. 100%

@kckcmctcrc 2 жыл бұрын

Excellent, wish you would have explained who Madison actually was before the very end.... Madison was a Cabinet Sec...got it.

@bugscranks7605 2 жыл бұрын

Brilliant explanation. Was Marshall purposely trying to expand the power of the Supreme Court?

@heimlershistory 2 жыл бұрын

For sure

@ethangc081 2 ай бұрын

This is kinda confusing. Which is it? Can the supreme court not do anything about the writ of mandamus because the Judiciary Act 1789 expanded their power beyond the constitution or was it because this was an original jurisdiction case so a writ of mandamus couldn’t be issued?

@antonygodinez8060 Жыл бұрын

Is marshal with the supreme court?

@0n3gam3 2 ай бұрын

If only marbury went to a district court before the supreme court

@katep7141 2 ай бұрын

ap gov exam in 2 hrs😅

@5ammy1205 2 ай бұрын

I got mine in like 40 mins

@skandasringari2370 2 ай бұрын

good luck mines in 30

@NorvilleRising 3 ай бұрын

I'm no AP Gov Major, I'm just a curious American, but isn't it unconstitutional for a branch to empower themselves? wouldn't Potus or Congress be required to allow the Supreme Justice's the ability to interpret the constitution?

@izzy9436 2 жыл бұрын

Hey Heimler, how does this case support federalist ideals?

@katierice9382 2 жыл бұрын

Hey, not Heimler, but a junior Political Science major. John Marshall (Supreme Court Chief Justice in this case) was a federalist appointed by John Adams (also a federalist) before Thomas Jefferson (a democratic-republican) took office. By ruling this way in Marbury v. Madison and establishing judicial review, it gave more power to the federal government, which is what federalists were for, whereas anti-federalists wanted the majority of power to be reserved for the states. The power of judicial review gives a MASSIVE amount of power to the national government through the Supreme Court, therefore supporting federalist ideals!

@minetime6881 Жыл бұрын

What’s the difference between anti-federalism and democratic republicanism?

@tpstrat14 2 жыл бұрын

this is one of the most important supreme court cases? Who was wronged? Or who would have been wronged if it went the other way? Seems like a bunch of boring technicalities that couldn't have made any difference in anyone's life besides William Marbury's.

@duckingcensorship1037 2 жыл бұрын

I'm still a legal novice, but I'm learning. What this case established was Judicial Review. Essentially the SC can declare any law that goes against the constitution as null and void.

@juniormichel1255 4 ай бұрын

Bruhhh, I was literally about to write "Sneaky Adams" down 🤣🤣

@Sks_julie21412 2 жыл бұрын

PM shout out

@imenmdemagh8692 2 жыл бұрын

Me being a foreigner learning English in her first year: 😫 Me understanding this sh*t: 😌

@Hornblas189 6 ай бұрын

so....The constitution held for only 14 years?

@Real_2Phase 2 жыл бұрын

So the Supreme Court gave itself a power it didn't have?

@Chaaaengstan 8 ай бұрын

WOW

@thelawfus 5 ай бұрын

This is one of the worst decisions in judicial history.

@WarriorBane 2 жыл бұрын

Old sneaky Adams adams again

@averagehooligan620 Жыл бұрын

umm..easy subscribe

@dari3nn 2 жыл бұрын

anyone else watching this in law school?

@toony9986 2 жыл бұрын

Do not remind me bad memories from U.S history lol

@jonathanhaas8342 2 жыл бұрын

To each there own but this is so boring

@lisadeanedemandzero9457 5 ай бұрын

Just wish he spoke faster. Don't understand why it's such a landmark case. Bunch of gobbledygook to this CJ student. God bless all of you who understand this. Choosing good ole' Miranda v. Arizona for assignment.