Marcos to Diaz: This is highly irregular at the very least. At worst, it is violative of the Civil Code
Пікірлер: 82
@mervingonzales56634 жыл бұрын
Shame For the 20 Senators Voted to Impeach SC Corona
@thatadanday12 жыл бұрын
we need brilliant senators like defensor-santiago and marcos....
@angeldelacruz81152 жыл бұрын
nakakalungkot na, na impeached ang CJ. Kahit na mali-mali ang mga ebidensya laban sa kanya.
@marcelinadeguzman5797 Жыл бұрын
Ngayon ko lang napanood ito. PBBM is such a brilliant & articulate judge
@jcsteeph881312 жыл бұрын
my gosh, he is indeed very articulate.
@jcsteeph881312 жыл бұрын
indeed he is very brilliant. i like miriam and bongbng very much
@carljonathan38044 жыл бұрын
That was the stupidest answer I've ever heard in a court. Rules are not applied on an impeachment trial? How did this person even get to handle a government office?
@loidanellas92572 жыл бұрын
He he he he he he he!
@daxnicolas81262 жыл бұрын
10 years ago i was 12years old. And now I realized the kind of politics that we have.
@Fidel672012 жыл бұрын
for me as if Corona wins here by having Senator Bongbong in his side...
@10skyluv11 жыл бұрын
If only we have more brilliant and intelligent senators like Miriam and Bongbong
@jacobrason37086 жыл бұрын
HULI NA PO ATTY. DIAZ BUKING NA KAYO NI MRS MIRIAM SANTIAGO REMEMBERS WHAT SHE SAID IS YOU ARE INCRIMANATING AN INNOCENT PERSON TO THE BRINKS OF CRIMINALITY. CORRECT.
@elleinadoj12 жыл бұрын
Brilliant... Just like his father...
@AkoToMarjon2 жыл бұрын
I can't imagine Leni Robredo giving state of the nation. Look at how BBM speak
@a.taurean22962 жыл бұрын
True
@denvercalonia9255 Жыл бұрын
You know what BBM lacks at this moment, he should have used the tactics of Miriam Deffensor which is to voice out with greater frequency the incompetence and pompous of a person. 😂But yeah BBM is a Decent man so never mind.
@yuushagaming1643 Жыл бұрын
He tends to be a stoic, calm and a measured person, just like his father in my opinion
@popoyRon12 жыл бұрын
kahihiyan ka diaz, magkano kaya bayad sau ng prosecution?..
@jimvillph5112 жыл бұрын
BBM for President! Nakakatakot pag si Miriam ang lalim lagi magsalita
@juamu11322 жыл бұрын
At yun nahuli ni marcos.so much for ateneo.
@dakoimo12 жыл бұрын
MARCOS has the point! buti pa just ACCEPT ATTY. DIAZ na NAGKAMALI KAYO sa OFFICE nyo!
@christianmacapayag2 жыл бұрын
Isn’t atty. diaz subject for perjury about his contradicting statements as a witness?
@johnmarionaraneta37632 жыл бұрын
Hindi matanggap ng witness na may pagkakamali siya rito. Obvious na obvious na. I miss Ma'am Miriam Defensor Santiago.
@jpdp75422 жыл бұрын
First of all, those are public records. Anyone can request for a certified copy of a title or other supporting documents. Registration in LRA/RODs are merely notices to the world about the circumstances of a certain property. It is not the business of the office/agency as to where/how those certified copies or information are going to be used. If the person who requested those certified copies used the information to destroy someone else, then it is his/her fault alone. LRA is only minding his own business when they produced a list using the name search as requested by the client.
@quinndelcarmen1384 Жыл бұрын
Yet diaz discontinued this method of providing documents on the grounds that he had "reservations about the vetting and potential use." but only after providing them in this one case for the prosecution. that in itself is very telling. vetting and rules are not inapplicable on the excuse that something is "sui generis". if that were the case, it would set dangerous precedents and even diaz admits to that except prior to it his own judgment was overruled by the pressure to accommodate political expediency.
@BobieRuiz2 ай бұрын
BBM President na Yarn, Bravo sir PBBM
@TheVlahdiVahstard8 жыл бұрын
Diaz continuously contradicts himself and basically applies only his moral judgement or lack of at this point. @12:16, if you look at his facial expression and body language, Diaz finally realizes that he cornered himself. Ignorance or playing coy at this level is inexcusable.
@TitoKamoteTV2 жыл бұрын
That's why he was cited about his violations of the civil code
@jacobrason37085 жыл бұрын
HAHAHA ANG TAWAG NITO HULI SA BIBIG ANG SINUNGALING..... IMAGINE ATTY. AS SUCH , OUGHT TO DISPENSE WHAT IS RIGHT,JUST AND THE TRUTH.... BAKIT SUPER LIER ANG DATING MO ATTY.DIAZ.... THANKS
@almoreno32315 жыл бұрын
He’s a liar!
@qanzap3313 Жыл бұрын
El presidente!
@roldanbarot39143 жыл бұрын
What an insult thing “Enhance your communication skills”😂. goodbye Diaz
@j12torts12 жыл бұрын
if all the evidence of planting evidence are here then why did most (except 3) senators foudn corona guilty
@takayanagi-senseissurprise21044 жыл бұрын
j12torts Some says they were paid by Nonoy but there isn’t any proof to support this statement.
@diocre74462 жыл бұрын
@@takayanagi-senseissurprise2104 the proof is when Revilla, and Jinggoy convicted. They admit about the payment.
@RealNayl Жыл бұрын
@@takayanagi-senseissurprise2104hindi pa ba sapat na patunay na umamin si jinggoy at revilla na binayaran sila at hinanapan na ng butas ng partido ni noynoy at pinakulong. Halatado naman. Sintido kumon lang ang kailangan.
@deejoy29122 жыл бұрын
galing ng presidente ko
@jacobrason3708 Жыл бұрын
The late senator miriam santiago already explain your actions that its not aacceptable hence all their evidences are hearsays
@josedor12 жыл бұрын
there was no need!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@renrenxapiko20402 жыл бұрын
MR. PBBM😍😍😍
@kaitokimura5172 жыл бұрын
DIAZ KONSENSYA MAY DIYOS AT KARMA TANDAAN MO MGA BOSS MO SAAN NA NGAUON DI BA
@animeneweablet2 жыл бұрын
I didn't know Marcos is part of the defense panel. Daymmnnn
@daigonaticsgulapanatics25562 жыл бұрын
nope. its impartial, the act of the sen. judge is to clarify the vague claim and ensure that there is no violation of equal protection clause. (e.g. u were accused of owning 10 cars but u only owned 1 , then the J itself assert particularity over the claim)
@lav307144 жыл бұрын
it was ah it was ah its was ah! NGA2 teh!
@ReejeeIligan Жыл бұрын
Walang sala ang CJ, nag-desisyon na ang Sandiganbayan. Its all about personal interest lang talaga ng past administration (2010-2016). So tama lang na acquitted siya kina dating Senador Miriam Defensor-Santiago, Joker Arroyo at PBBM. Isa itong panalo ng Korte Suprema!
@ruthgrace2286 Жыл бұрын
What a waste that All these 3 Great People no longer Alive😢😢😢 THEN: SEN MIRRIAM DEFENSOR SANTIAGO SEN JOKER ARROYO CJ RENATO CORONA HOW I WISH FOR THEM TO BE STILL ALIVE🥹🥹🥹😭😭😭🙏🙏🙏to this very day🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭
@ruthgrace2286 Жыл бұрын
CERTAINLY THEY ARE SMILING FROM HEAVEN🙏🙏🙏😊😊😊
@nicopelomiano243010 ай бұрын
Why isn't this kind of BBM that became President today?
@georjienefrancisco34424 жыл бұрын
Lo
@ciprianodefrancisca2392 жыл бұрын
ginago nyo si corona..ayan..bumawi sa lahat pinoy..dinamay pa buong mundo!!!
@TheFlorida7212 жыл бұрын
panindigan mo na Diaz!LOL!
@stevearellano22352 жыл бұрын
Diaz stands for Double Standard. Ha ha ha! Yari!
@agent101ize Жыл бұрын
Marcos here was a pro. Sunog yung lra admin haha
@allancabatbat71374 жыл бұрын
5:47 tulog si Drilon hahahaha
@adriangumbahali37382 жыл бұрын
i notice also hahaha he always sleeping while in front of trial court impeachment
@vauntace262 жыл бұрын
San si drilon don?
@adriangumbahali37382 жыл бұрын
@@vauntace26 nasa tabi ata ni jinggoy
@vauntace262 жыл бұрын
@@adriangumbahali3738 asan si jonggoy
@scoutbaudelaire78732 жыл бұрын
@@vauntace26 sa tabi ni drilon. Hahaha
@lloydaaronmenioria44472 жыл бұрын
May corona virus na ung 2012
@nuttkeg20099 жыл бұрын
Mr. Marcos is misconstrued with the facts running along the good line of judgement apparent to Atty Eulalio Diaz III. Atty Diaz cannot be grilled with incriminating actuations just to convince him to side up on the losing end. It appears clear that Atty Eulalio Diaz III is sane & in his right mind & he's fully aware about his moral integrity hanging at stake along the trail of deliberations he had to face. It's somehow amazing to see Atty Diaz well intact in his composure throughout the blame-calling. In my opinion, he had something right to say in almost every point and thru that it plainly spells out that he executed his job in good faith.