Hold your exaggerated views. Vital became a metaphor

@@adrianfanaca9169 thats all you have to bring to the convo is she talks to fast and other ppl shouldn't be excited by her

Mariana Mazzucato is an endless recourse of word-salads. It is a niche market occupied by others too.

It’s the exact opposite. The private sector’s main goal is profit, not well-being of the people. Why would they be the “good guys” in this scenario, and why would we give them unfettered control over situations when they have repeatedly demonstrated that they are willing to let everything else go down the toilet to feed their greedy obese shareholders?

This would only work in a democracy. The CCP and Russia for that matter, are not democracies. In both cases there is no responsibility to the governed - power to govern does not come from the people. You can't have a public/private partnership unless the public sector is a willing participant - and if that fails then what Dr. Mazzucato spoke about is irrelevant.

So goolge is deleting all honest comments?

Mariana Mazzucato is an endless recourse of word-salads. It is a niche market occupied by others too.

its a put up or stfu approach, its to fight money pit project that lead nowhere. IE: the development of a certain us jet fighter i wont name. Or white whale Like the Reagan; Star War ICBM defense system. US gov is notorious to line up pockets of bad actors. I don't think Mariana imply a ticking time bomb deadline of your project i assume delay would be extended on a progress basis. Has for the details I believe she meant permanent position IE: employ directly by DARPA. or ARPA w/e entity. So your liable to you employer.

A socialist dictatorship would take care of all that. Like Venezuela. No elections for at least a couple of decades.

@@Safe-and-effective Yeah. Or maybe another 10 years to add onto the 50 years of neoliberalism that delivered the exact opposite of what is promised will fix it. Maybe when there is two classes again, it will be fixed.

You think there should be no government?

@@gallectee6032 That's not what I meant, I just haven't heard any good arguments against the Milton Friedman's and Ayn Rand's of the world who say government intervention in business and our personal lives, beyond enforcing peace, is counterproductive.

@@colemclain3563 I disagree. Monopolies are a very good example of why government is a necessity in business. There are tons of other unethical business practices that are rampant that do not support the free market system, proving regulation to be necessary.

@@gallectee6032 Right but then the idea is that the big businesses will have more power to manipulate the government into doing what they want allowing them to become bigger. Aren't people suspicious of the government? Why would we want some strange, massive thing full of shady individuals getting in cahoots with some other shady individuals?

Good governance should be a facilitator, also a check post to weed out negatives.

lol what theres alot to say i guess

What a small comment from a limited mind. Go away.

@@KZfaqUserCMXVIICDI what's not true in the "small comment"?

@@dom2555 Insinuating that academics are rent seekers. That people just operate for self gain. The fact you think she's going to congratulate governments, or governments will listen to her, when theyre in the pockets of capitalists. I mean, the whole thing is just a ludicrous fantasy basically...

@@botchedmandala5197 look at how many roles she has/had as advisor, because of what she preaches, she says what they want to hear, it works like horoscope pretty much. Entitling goverments to do more, as if society and economy is a washing machine that needs to be fixed constantly. Look at how governments enlarged during the time, how they control directly more and more assets and what are the results. What are negative consequences for academics? And teachers? Do they pay if their students end up working at McDonald's with a Master degree and defaulting over student loans? I don't think so (and btw you know why and because of who the problem of student loans started in first place?). They have positive asymmetry, same as policy-makers and many other categories. About self gain, I'll quote Adam Smith: It is not from the benevolence of the butcher. the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. Miss Mazzucato at the question: "why your WHO commission is composed by all women" once answered quote on quote with: "why the fuck not". You think that's an analytical and objective mind? A serious economist? If science (even human sciences) falls into propaganda we're all screwed. No thanks.

@@dom2555 I don't know if you've read all of Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations but he also mentions "Such regulations (financial regulations) may, no doubt, be considered as in some respects a violation of natural liberty. But those exertions of the natural liberty of a few individuals, which might endanger the security of the whole society, are, and ought to be, restrained by the laws of all governments, of the most free as well as of the most despotical."