Clearly, based on history, all american presidents are above the law.

indeed the argument when one party does this, the other will do it too is useless, it all comes down to the judges, did he really do something illegal or not, you can try to sentence a president as much as you want, if nothing happened, no punishment

@@patrickvangelder3349 Well, I don’t believe for a second that judges are impartial. But the fact remains that someone who breaks the law should be held responsible (especially if it was egregious). The outcome, actual justice, may be beyond our control, but that shouldn’t play into the decision to seek justice.

Carrie needs to put her empty head to use and snag a gig at MSNBC. She brings nothing to the table. And Mark needs to stick to economics because anytime he strays outside of his expertise (foreign policy, mass vaccination, etc) he comes off dumber than Carrie.

Agreed. It's basically like repossessing some overdue library books, that Trump should not have still had on his property after leaving office. (HIGHLY sensitive/top secret "library books", of course). Whether any actual prosecution (and for what offences, if any) arises out of this afterwards is unknown at this time.

Rationalizing not holding anyone accountable for wrongdoing. It's the American way.

Astro turf creates an awful heat island effect. Do not recommend unless you want a giant lava patch! Just rewild it to native stuff - help bees and butterflies

@@Life_as_Game That is how I feel ..pocket the money and let nature take over, for that natural look.

@@stephenphillips6245 It's intermittently beautiful, as the wildflowers go through their natural cycle. The occasional clip/clip/clip, step the deadhead flowerseeds into the soil, far less work than a lawn.

@@buzoff4642 Lawns are overrated

After the "Patriot" Act... After the "Defense of Marriage" Act.... After Operations "Just Cause" and "Iraqi Freedom"... Christ, I'd say the name of this bill is almost an exercise in understatement.

A lot of folks are under the impression that it’s coming out of their paychecks to pay for worthless education, history, and liberal arts degrees. Or are in the “I served and suffered so you should too crowd”.

And yet nothing - NOTHING - can compare to giving up meat and dairy in terms of water consumption. Look it up. You'll be astonished. Yet no one wants to talk about it... A bunch of young Maori made a documentary about how "sustainable" dairy is sucking up and polluting NZ's water that came out this year. It's called Milked and it is free on KZfaq.

“There’s lots of stuff and other stuff that affected some stuff.” Now back to you, Mark.

Case in point "LatinX"

That's because she's a groupie for big brained men. She's an idiot, but wants to exist in intellectual circles in the hopes some of it might rub off on her. It hasn't.

I've had a long think about this and you are overthinking.

No such thing as "CCP".

@@stavroskarageorgis4804 It'll sure come as news to its tens of millions of card-carrying members that the Chinese Communist Party is a fiction.

Cyber Slim: Your theory makes sense, only if your posture is itching for war.

@@Vanderearden No, hate war, will run away, never participate! What I think and will do, does not change the fact, that a lot of commi officials think war is coming, because once the economy is in tatters and the people are super fed up with gov, the only way to stay in power is with a massive distraction: war.

@@cyberslim7955: The U.S. has been distracting with war around the globe for over a century. And who are these "Commi's" you speak of?

Never?

As soon as Russia and China finish signing up the majority of the oil rich nations to the BRICS economic and security pact. So very soon. Death march is playing and the west are crying and fighting hard to stop them.

Unlikely in our lifetimes. Won't happen unless the US government collapses which could happen but most likely is still 100-200 years away.

Never.

Sorry to disappoint you, but likely not for a long long time.

remind me which fossil fuel industry you work for.

gees you're a muppet

One thing's for sure that we don't need a peer review for- you've been freeze-dried for quite awhile.

The dust bowl was also man made.

@@scriptguru4669 My checkered career intersected climate science a couple of times in stuff I knew about. 1. You can't solve the Navier Stokes equations in 3D, owing to 3D fluid flows (atmosphere) cascading to shorter and shorter scales, so any numerical grid spacing is inadequate. But the shorter scale motions feed back strongly on the larger scale motions, so you wind up with no solution. The sub-gridscale motions act as an ersatz viscosity for larger scale flows (transport of x momentum in the y direction, so I suppose it would resemble a tensor, not even a scalar). Nevertheless simulations include it only as a term like "effective vicsocity." This isn't physics any longer and the model is garbage. You can solve the Navier Stokes equations in 2D pretty easily since a quantity called vorticity is then conserved. Where it breaks down in 3D is that vortices kink and break up. It takes a couple of days for large 2D weather vortices to kink and break up, so that's how long weather forecasts work. 2. You can't distinguish a long cycle from a trend with data that's short compared to the long cycle you're wanting to eliminate. A long cycle of course isn't man-caused, so it's wanted to be eliminated. The mathematical reason is that the eigenvalues of the linear system blow up, think ten to the thirtieth power or so, so any noise in the measurement immediately swamps the signal and you get no information. So you don't know that there's a trend. (1) says there's no model, and (2) says that there's no data. Me? Just a science guy. I ride a bicycle to work, have no air conditioning at home. No fossil fuels except 3 in 1 oil on the bike chain.

The dollar index is the highest its been since 2002.