BBC is Fake News and push the Globalist Agendas - just look at the Planned Scam Demic - 2020 had the 18th LOWEST Death Rate over previous 30 years !!! Office for National Statistics and ZERO Talk about the EXCESS DEATHS from the Poison Juice etc etc etc

​@@mrmensa1096lowest death rate?? So did the lockdown save lives or did it not?

No thanks.

I’d like for you to explain what the meaning of woke is because I don’t think you actually know.

@@bigtwit799 No me neither.... Not one bit bitter is he the 107 year old Lawrenson.

Spot on!

He sounds like Alan Partridge moaning about being taken off the TV 🤣

I never met anyone that liked Lawro as a commentator pundit when he was on MOTD but suddenly he calls out the 'wokes' and every gammon in the country pretends he was brilliant. Do people ever think it might be due to the fact he retired 30+ years ago and just mightn't have that much insight into the dynamics or tactics of a modern team anymore? No, it was definitely the wokes!

All no doubt true. It becomes a question of whether you want a BBC. No adverts and some integrity to what it does. I do as degeneration is so much easier than re-generation. It's cheap publicity to just keep pushing at the barriers of decency like say Piers Morgan has done - along with much more of our media. In fact when news is scarce they feed off themselves. At the moment its photo manipulation by HRH Princess of Wales. Photos have been "manipulated" since its invention. What is posing and one's best side otherwise all about. We haven't got to the smoke & mirrors yet. And who has done more to alter photos than the very media now kicking up all the fuss. They have spoiled Cate's hobby as she convalesces, in such a spiteful and opportunistic way to behave.

I can see how the wording on their letters actually scares people there’ll be some kind of legal prosecution, those letters can be horrible. But, you’re absolutely correct. More people should take note.

@@RichardHodgson-wb9lk Absolutely, the way TV licencing use wording in their letters is clearly to cause fear and stress to the person receiving them. It's totally unacceptable that the BBC are allowed to continually send threatening letters out to the same address every month with the intention of getting the addresse to pay out of fear for something they don't want or don't need.

Its also illegal to do what the TV Licensing do, threatening court action like they constantly do. But because the BBC is the mouth piece of the Government they are allowed to get away with unlawful conduct like this. Its illegal to send threats of court action in this manner unless there is actual intent to do so. TV Licensing do it as a matter of course, and constantly, with their default letters which begin "we believe you may be watching" (e.t.c), then cycle through automatically to "we will prosecute", and finally "we are sending someone round and will prosecute". Then it begins all again from the start. There is absolutely NO REASON why this State enforced channel is a legal requirement, other than without forcing everyone to pay for it the Government know they would become irrelevant and no one would be listening to their constant lies, brainwashing and social conditioning agendas. The Bullshit Broadcasting Corporation could be an encrypted pay to view service just like every other one of its "competitors" is. But its for the reasons above that's why it isnt. I DONT WANT THE CRAPPY BBC! Nor will I pay for it either. I had TV license once.. just the once, for one year. Dont want it. Not paying. Never will. @jason I'm fairly sure they closed the loop hole you talked about, about not watching live tv. Fairly sure they made it illegal to watch even via stream some time ago. (but there IS another loop hole... although not useful to most people works for me)

He comes across as being quite thick.

Its because the top 4 people who run the bbc are tory donors.. Not that i think labour would change anything for the better but the facts are those who run the bbc are Conservatives. Anti religion also.

One small step at a time mate - Lawro is awaking slowly.

Because Tories are vile

I wish a Labour (or indeed any government) would

The expiry of a fixed-term contract is treated as a dismissal, for unfair dismissal purposes. www.gov.uk/fixed-term-contracts/renewing-or-ending-a-fixedterm-contract

If a contract comes to the end and is unexpectedly not renewed, it's emotionally equivalent to a sacking. I suspect presenter orientated ageism is the main drive.

No it isnt. ​@tim40gabby25

@@basicfilmblog yes it is.....top of the woke league....lol...

Crying like a right snowflake.

Also why is that Fara on it every week alongside Alex Scott about men’s football. It’s completely ridiculous & irrelevant now..

world has gone mad because the ones running the show are crazy

@@gavinmillar461I think that Fara Williams and Kelly Somers are the only two women who make intelligent comments or ask interesting questions. The monosyllabic Alex Scott is appalling, trying to constantly make jokey comments rather than focus on the subject in hand. Having watched Football Focus for decades it is now just a vehicle for wokeness and inclusion, at the expense of in depth reporting and analysis.

Seriously!!? Woh!

Basically a team full of nonces.

Yes boring & people would rather see younger ex footballers from 1 generation before than 65 year old

Apparently, by default, speaking out against the BBC woke machine ruining MOTD is racist and sexist. (see my last sentence though which sums this current state of nonsense up though). at least he knew what he was actually talking about though? People respected his opinion having actually PLAYED at the highest level and IN THE VERSION OF THE GAME he was talking about. I agree with you to some degree, he wasnt the most interest pundit, but it should ALWAYS be the most qualified, best person for the job that gets the seat. Race and gender should be completely irrelevant in this decision (but now they are the primary focus to the detriment of the programme). Give me Gabbi Logan over the god damn awful Alex Scott et al. (cant even remember the names of the rest because I've never heard of them before). Wrighty, Rio, Micah, Thierry over Owen. BEST PERSON FOR THE JOB! Dont care what colour or gender they are, so long as they're the best at the job. Ditch the woke agenda Lineker, , Dublin (this guy actually makes Homes under the Hammer even more boring!), Jenas (he's like a social conditioning machine on steroids with his Government scripted bollocks) and the all rest of the current priority hosts/pundits. Gimme, Gabbi, Ian Wright, Shearer, Danny, Micah, Robbie Savage every time. God forbid we should actually have the best talent on the programme rather than BBC tick boxing moronic puppets.

100%. He got progressively more cynical and negative as the years went by. He's not wrong about the wokeness at the beeb, but his time was definitely up. His 'analysis' was hardly worth listening to by the end.

Add them to a long list. Sky are just as bad and the problem extends far beyond broadcasting.

They’re busy trying to cover over the fact they’re a peodophile ring

No, no it’s not.

It's been there a long time, Martin, we just didn't notice before.

And we pay license fees for what.

I agree. The BBC are a Labour supporting company. The Conservatives had an 80 seat majority and I voted for them to do two simple things. Defund the BBC and stop the boats. They had no intention of doing either.

DON'T BUY LICENCE...I NEVER HAVE!!! FCK EM!!!!

Labour will pour money into the BBC

Labour are a mess too

@@David-bs6fq Get used to them - 4 years in power coming up! Can't wait!

It is something akin to a sacking as not renewing a contract is basically stopping people from working.

Says you? pipe down

@@jimbo6059 He worked there 30 years and if you heard him just once you'd realize he worked there 20 years too long. Man was miserable and hated football. Now he's bitter he lost his pay-check, he gives me big freeloader vibes.

Ditto!

Same here , I’m not interested in ladies football , and don’t want a woman talking about the men’s football , it’s a different game , as for question of sport they killed that show , by going woke

Melodramatic. Drama queen! Really!? Most presenters are white males . Mark was dull at commentary. As if he didn’t want to be there. Let’s not pretend he was full of life, enthusiasm and articulate when commentary matches.

Logan finished MOTD for me. Unfortunately...grew up watching it. They have destroyed rugby 🏉 aswell. High heels,handbags and hi lites....

So you never watched the white, make pensioner, Mark Lawrence, share his pearls of wisdom?

@HakonOdinson ",people will only treat you how you allow them to treat you" I completely agree 👍🏾

People say that now

The people coming into the BBC are from a different era, the days when things were done right but tough are gone, the new people have only known the world a certain way and pander to all kinds of nonsense. A wake up call may come when their soft easy life ends.

Unlikely considering the future population

I’ve been saying that for years and now the situation is irretrievable. It’s worse than sad

Neither

A young girl in school who's into football probably looks at Alex Scott. An old man looks to Lawro. Both are needed to give everyone a fair crack at the sport.

@@markob53 Old men have no place in the game. I should know, I am one.

​@@AllyLamontI want to hear interesting opinions about football. The most interesting thing about Lawrenson was his sodding moustache. He'll blame the woke BBC for making him shave that as well. Mans well past his sell by date.

@markob53 I was being facetious. I have no problem with Alex Scott, she seems a nice person and knows what's she's talking about. Eni Aluko on ITV is good too. I have never liked Mark Lawrenson. Always negative, generally not a very pleasant presence, quite dull and desultory. Happy to get rid. Maybe he could take Martin Keown with him?

Nice one John.

Reported

Having a TV License is literally paying for your own brainwashing. Government agenda woke conditioning channel. Its like paying to have a lying corrupt politician in your living room 24/7. Without it they couldnt brainwash the population to believe their lies. Why else are the BBC the ONLY mandated tv service in the UK?! Encrypt the BBC, like every other TV service, so its only visible to those that opt to pay for it. Government would lose their hold and manipulation of the public, hence why they force you to have it with threats of court, fines and imprisonment. Fearmongering liars.

Absolutely

You don't want to add stupid people are discriminated against too?

@@neillynch_ecocidologistWell you DID take the experimental c0nvid jab no one actually needed. Didn't you? If that doesn't illustrate utter stupidity I don't know what does.

No he didnt he was a terrible presenter.

65 should be retired.Stop playing the victim

what like Trump?

It’s from California where all these American tech companies are based as there’s no wokeness in Italy as Farage correctly observed.

We can't blame America. We saw what was happening and decided to follow anyway. That's on us

It's not America. Is the people behind it. George Soros literally funds it.

Ban American social media that would massively reduce their influence outside the United states

Some of us do a adopt a tricky persona. A lot comes with ones accent. Brummies sound amazed at everything, Yorkies want a fight, Scots are confrontational, And Londoners always right.

Easy pleased

Even at the time I thought Clarkson may have got in trouble with the BBC for that sketch. Although in some ways he did as it's clear many at the BBC behind the scenes got their knives out for Clarkson not long after. Everything he said or did was picked apart for what felt like ages and I bet they couldn't believe their luck after he hit that guy. He gave them the win they had been waiting for because Top Gear was never getting axed due to how well it was doing at the time.

S- how much of the item do you think had been set up in advance? JC in the car? Check. Empty filmable corridors? Check. Room full of laughable "woke" stereotypes. Check. Gullible viewers. No need to set them up, they set themselves up.

@@PeteCarlton I didn't think it was genuine for one second. C'mon! Satire - the point is, he say the way things were going at the Beeb.

saw

Crap pundit/commentator. Try and find a comment online praising him before he was dropped and it turned into some nonsense ‘woke’ hard done by story.

@@krispyai4229 you sound like a teenage child where you can only feel in the extremes. He wasn't the best, he wasn't 'crap'. But he was definitely better than a lot of the box ticking pundits moved in to replace the old guard, who can barely string a sentence together and who's tactical analysis is akin to 'I just hope both teams have fun'.

​@@dannymorgan4839he was shite, hated him on Motd.

Mark, Matt and a few more are straight talkers.

So do you want all these older pundits to be employed until the day they die?

Really!? Most presenters are white makes. Mark was dull at commentary. As if he didn’t want to be there. Let’s not pretend he was full of life, enthusiasm and articulate when commentary matches.

Really!? Most presenters are white males . Mark was dull at commentary. As if he didn’t want to be there. Let’s not pretend he was full of life, enthusiasm and articulate when commentary matches.

You're trying to turn and stir this up into a race thing when it isn't, he told us why he was sacked. The big clue was the one year short term contracts. It's more to do with his age and money, nothing to do with his colour. You're talking like ethnic minorities don't get sacked or made redundant from jobs like everyone else or something. They're not some protected class, I don't know where this idea is coming from.

Why would you even pay it in the first place

because its the law. If you operate any device that is capable of reproducing a tv signal, you need a licence. It is a licence for use of the device. Nit to watch the BBC.

Yeah, right, he was awful, just a miserable git that moaned about everything; you must be thinking of Alan Hansen, who was an excellent pundit.

@@Vipa567 Alan was the same personality. Boring with it

Great player for Brighton,Liverpool and Ireland.

⁠@@myaphextwin807. You don’t like anybody by the sounds of it Lol. How can you hate mark lawrenson..you don’t even know the guy lol. he’s a alright guy

do you really sit and wait for the guests to talk about the match tho really ? he's 66.

You gave up watching jugs?

I am offended by this video.

@@barrygeorgeisabenefitcheat8287 Good

Another saying for Mark: "Money for Old Rope". He should know because he's been selling it for a quarter of a Century on the BBC...

Could you retype that in coherent English?

John I was wondering...

i write thing's similar all the time and instantly shadow banned, how aren't you?

Just lucky this time, I have been shadow banned plenty of times. @@dalebaker5030

Derrrr no way - really?, wow, you're quick !

FACT 🤣

And didn't lick Lineker's arse.

Nope, you're wrong, you don't need a licence for a radio, even to listen to BBC radio stations.

They should have told him a good year in advance to help him adjust mentally for it .

If you want to follow legislation OR simply call TV licensing, remove their implied access to your property, tell them to stop sending letters and then stop paying. Done.

What counts as a live broadcast?

Ridiculous

Is that true?

@@anthonycarr8828 Nope. But some random said it on social media which I gather now counts as truth😂

Mate what else can they. Tax us on your right I have never known the British people be txt so much I hear they want to put a txt on us for having sky TV and broadband internet at home now because they said in business they have to pay a tax on it so should all of us it's a joke

There’s other taxes which are “invisible”. Spending on war decreases spending on roads, housing, hospitals, schools, police etc. Fix the problems at home, then poke our noses in elsewhere. Labour, nor any of the others will fix it. They’re virtually all “noses in the trough types”.

Don't pay it then. I promise you, nothing had will happen to you if you just stop giving them money. Throw their letters in the bin and politely tell their salesmen "No thanks" if ever they knock on your door. There's nothing they can do about it.

Worked for me, except they never came to my door, had they I would have just closed it in their faces or told them to fuck off, depending on the mood they caught me in or how polite they were! But just to touch upon and add to your advice, best bet is never give them any details which they will then use to harrass and intimidate you, maybe with court letters etc. NEVER let them in, NEVER tell them your name, treat them like rapists basically! And enjoy not being a slave to the BBC scam@@cshartley101

Move to Haiti. There are no taxes there like in this stupid democracy in the U.K. You might love it. And when you watch telly there, you don't get annoying messages along the lines of "Do you have a T.V. licence". The tax-free utopia.

Retirement age!

You are right, but the license is still wrong.

Try buying a new TV with cash. Card and name required.

Live *UK* broadcasts/stations

​@@peterobbo7512doesn't matter nobody can enforce you to buy a TV licence or deny you the purchase of a TV without one

it's not required for anything, just say no

How expensive is that freedom though? How much money do you pay to subscription TV? Is the quality better than the BBC? Are the shows just American imports, or licenced from the BBC or ITV? If you only use a TV to watch KZfaq, or dvd movies, then I would agree that no licence is required, but in actuality you are paying for a service, either way.

@@wolfen210959 I don't use the TV for anything. I watch KZfaq on my laptop. Or, maybe watch an old dvd movie through the TV. Life's good. I don't miss the propaganda box.

​@paulhank7967 I totally agree with you. Now I can watch the REAL news on alternative media streams, that don't proliferate a state of unnecessary fear within the population.

​@@Redman680 Excellent satire.

You don't get locked up for not paying your TV license.

Chance of them proving it.....zero...not paid it in years

@@ColDaxx-ki3ul there are plenty of women who have served time in prison for not paying the fine for not having a TV licence.

So..? Do you work for nothing..? Why should he..?

MM, whats that i hear ? oh, its the green monster !!!!

He hasn’t done anything you wouldn’t do in his position yourself, and you know it, work on that bitter hypocrisy simmering in you, you might enjoy life better

He does come across a bit Alan Partridge. The BBC doesn't owe him anything he was just talking about football FFS.

Would have earned far more working for the BBC than as a Footballer

I'm 50% sure Lawrenson doesn't have those kind of things on his computer

AND THAT MY FRIEND GOT HIM NAILED IN THE END, EVEN GARY KNEW WHAT WAS GOING TO HAPPEN TO HIM. GARY HAS A TOP AGENT

No, but you do if you're watching anything other than streamed content that's not live, and that includes iPlayer.

Correct, but if you watch Black Belt Barrister, you will learn that the BBC demands you to have a licence if you watch LIVE broadcast channels of ANY ilk. The harassing letter they regularly send out seems to infer that if someone does a live stream on YT, it falls under that legal requirement. The barrister believes that no court of law would uphold that, however.

@@travelbugse2829 tbf the whole premise of a needing a “licence” to watch TV is on extremely dodgy legal ground in general. If you know anybody that’s paid a £1000 fine I’m all ears, but I haven’t. It’s basically a shite protection racket.

@@arthurguitar Yes I'd be curious to actually hear of such a situation myself. I'm being told off on another comment thread for mentioning that neighbours of mine (unnamed obviously!) are receiving such letters (and tearing them up and leaving them in the communal area in one person's case) and ignoring them. Now, I find the licence requirement as barmy and frustrating as the next person, but venturing an opinion on people's decisions to not pay and thus break the law, well, they've got nothing to complain about if they get caught out. Apparently I'm not allowed to air that view in public though, because it's "only their business". I just hope the government give this fee some serious thought in future, but then I'm also hoping for a £5 per hour rise for the minimum wage.

Hasn’t he ever

I think it's more because he's cut his hair. Used to wear it much longer, which tends to make men look younger, also helped disguise his balding.

He is nearly 70 you 🤡

@@imonlytellingthetruth6562 I hadn’t seen him on telly for a while, hence my comment about him ageing you CLOWN

@@NoxiousRobshort hair makes men look younger 😂

He was one of their own. He organised all their party's.

So did the Tory party and the boomers

​@@davidthomas7738look up elm guest house and Cliff "kitty" Richard

Same old excuses, im middle aged white man. So did he want work till he dies on BBC. The same way he was employed and someone lost their job so please stop talking nonsense and make it out as a race issue

@@JJbyo I'm a middle aged white man who's best mate is a black Jamaican. I'm not in the least bit racist but he's 💯 right and it's not just the BBC that are doing this, it's thoughout the media, TV and Hollywood. How many movies do you see now where the strong masculine archetype hero is white? Very few. They're either playing the single alcoholic dad, gay, man with mental health issues, etc and the strong family unit is played by a black actor, white actress with mixed race children. It's social conditioning from the same people behind the trans agenda and introducing drag queen story hour into schools...United Nations. Look into Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi while you're at it. 👍👍

we try to tell em - but do they listen? also you cant watch the BBC catch up iplayer thing

Booooooooring.

You can't watch BBC iPlayer, you can't watch ITV or the itv app. I haven't had a licence for a decade now.

wrong :)

@@SloofmanTV No it isn't..

Give Super Kev my regards. Legend.

Oh no! Scary women!

Hanson just disappeared. I think he was sick but Mark was dull at commentary. As if he didn’t want to be there. Let’s not pretend he was full of life, enthusiasm and articulate when commentary matches.

@@miamitten1123 You miss the point back then he stated strong opinions critical of the players etc. Now you can hear reticence in their remarks, to be careful what you say, be nice and not inflammatory, and check if it contravenes any guidelines - as he said he had an earpiece with don't answer that etc -boring as hell.

@@miamitten1123 Alan Hansen said he quit because he always got nervous. Maybe he was just fed up with the way the BBC was going like a lot of us.

UTFT!

Completely irrelevant what team you support. "Ooh look at me, I support a rival football team, but I'm giving a complement to one of our rival teams ex players"

How do you know? I’m interested?

@@Nttmf he says so. Watch video

Would you do that to someone after 25 years service?

@@tuckasamms whether they were loyal enough or not doesn't change the fact he wasn't sacked. It happens all the time in media & 99% of those involved don't say they were sacked. When a footballer's contract is up the player is free, but no-one says they've been sacked

@@Nttmfhe says so

What would be the point in being behind the camera? You wouldn't be on the telly. LIKE MARK LAWRENSON ISNT

@@BarryRerack147 LOLZ Not sure you understand TV/video production. Some of the magic happens behind the camera, you know. 🤣 As for Lawrenson, he's been on TV and done that. He's a very old man now and I'm sure very happy with his life's achievements. What have you achieved? When have you ever been a sport's star or invited to be on TV because people want to hear you talk on anything? I think we both know the answer to that question. 🤣

@mosesrocco6614 Yep. I was interviewed on TV (Eurosport) less than a month ago. And I'm not black, gay, disabled or anything. But you go off on one and assume.

Precisely mate, if that long! They are on here quicker some times. Giving up a Saturday evening for MOTD is bonkers.

I can't stand Lineker.

Me too.

ahhhhh the old "DVD's" that old chestnut

​@@mrsalvatore1234ah touche

and how do you suppose they'll catch you

​@@Vipa567by using the nasa level technology of the TV detector van. Or peeping thru your window one or the other

How about if it was a Penny?

So you don't pay a TV licence? Do you watch live TV or Freeview channels?

@@Nightopian1982 nope, gaming and Netflix, Amazon Prime

@@michaelwhite2393 fair dos, as long as you aren't streaming live content. Sorry, I'm not being the licence police, my uncle got fined for watching iPlayer without a TV licence.

@bobbyjenkins4476. Tell @Nightopian1982 to mind its own business what you watch.

Moore and Motty were great but for me personally Barry Davies was the King of commentators. He was incredible.

@@mosesrocco6614 Yeah I liked Barry Davies too, very much - he was special for me because he commentated on our FA Cup Semi win v Woolwich when scored the bullet.... My Dad met Barry Davies too - said he was a very likeable chap.

Lawrenson and Hansen were better defenders for Liverpool playing football. Lineker against them was a bad and sad loser.

They were f√¢king horrible. You must be 120yo 😂

@@petergroverd6626Much as I detest most of what Loneker stands for, he was never a loser for Club, Country, or in his multi-million contract careers since. He recently had huge annual contracts at The BBC ( £41,000 per appearance) BT Sport(TNT) and Walkers.

Meanwhile I'm watching quality British TV on the BBC and you're watching Amazon Prime and Netflix, largely American crap. As for ITV!!! God help us if that's all people are watching, the dumbed-down nation we're soon going to become.

Not true. You need a licence to watch Amazon Prime, Now and even KZfaq. The reason is they all broadcast live content intended for mass consumption by a large audience at the same time. BBC are trying to corner the market.

😂🤣@@MrKeefy1967imagine trying to gaslight that the bbc has made anything of quality with our stolen money for decades

Just looked that up and you are spot on. Thanks for the tip 👍

​@@MrKeefy1967Ah yes. Quality TV. Doctor Who and the non-binary Daleks. Hilarious. The old doctor joined at the groin with the new skirt wearer. Got rid of my licence years ago. Not regretted it for a moment.

He should have added "and male"

Same here mate , it’s the only way to try and affect change ,,I’ve no license , never watch premier league , any competition England are involved in since the blm crap , (which means empty golf courses during euro and world cups , magic ) and get my football from watching lower league and non league matches , good , honest football ,

LicenCe.

2028, apparently.

At collecting unpaid tv licenses?

Couldn't agree more. A joke of a pundit. Not that the rest are brilliant either, but I won't miss Lawrenson

I did and I found Lawrenson’s curmudgeonly persona and general cynicism a welcome tonic to the feigned elation the likes of Robbie Savage typically excreted… 🙂

@@makara80 judged next to Savage anybody is tolerable

Agree. His co-commentary gave the impression of someone who was sat across the room looking up from his crossword every five minutes or so. The most bored and boring person in the stadium.

He was an awful pundit

The BBC don't care how many people switch off. They only care about pushing their woke diversity agenda at every opportunity.

A woman got a job? Poor little snowflake.

‘Do they expect to work forever’ - no, just not be disposed of for highly dubious reasons. What a fatuous question.

@@makara80 they are paid ridiculous amounts and treated like royalty, so what if they get fired, its life , life's tougher in the real working world , factories , warehouses, NHS, building sites , those people have a sob story. Grow a pair you drip.

@@makara80 Except he's just saying those are the reasons without evidence. He was 65, you can see he is looking older. Should be stay until 75 or 80? I dare say when he initially got a job as a pundit it was at the expense of someone else who BBC deemed surplus to requirements. He should be grateful they kept him around so long.

It's not fine and correct to have female experts on men's football. How are they an expert on the men's game ? They aren't qualified to be there.

Absolutely spot on mate...this is all one way street in favour of one gender bias

MOTD hasn't had a woman on it for 99% of the episodes this season. WTF are you talking about?

​@@MrKeefy1967motd live games

@@McaliAsot Are there any? FA Cup matches? euro finals? World cups? Doesn't amount to very much at all these days, not compared to the twice-weekly MOTD studio programmes. And not even all of those live matches have women pundits. I'll stick with my original estimate. You're seeing things where you want to and where they don't actually exist - obsessed and paranoid.

Yeah ..blasé …nonchalant…and awaits ending with some stupid joke that had no place …

I second that (from Meath) 🇮🇪☘

Don't forget Preston North End legend

Of course. Preston North End. He has a great fondness for them. They’re his favourite club. Apologies for not mentioning them as well. 🇮🇪 ☘️

@@hittitecharioteer Glad you agree. Up Meath ! From Dublin ! Happy St Pats. 🇮🇪 ☘️

@@ELal-rd1bk And to you. 🍻Sláinte ☘🇮🇪

🙄

They lost me when females took over.

Just like all the other shows now m8 sad times

Do women scare you? Did your Mother beat you? Why do you hate women?

Probably best you don't.

Effectively sacked ..you can't sack someone under contact under unless they have breached the contact

He wasn't sacked in the manner of being handed his P45 and being shown the door, but it's arguably constructive dismissal in how the telephone conversation went - "you don't want to do this, do you", as opposed to being asked whether he'd be up for going on the road week in week out at 65 years old. He was effectively being asked to sack himself.