It sounds like a motorbike

@@audioamateur lol

@@ranchu8385 not saying it's necessarily a bad thing ;)

@@audioamateur yeah ik, it actually does sound like 1 lmao

@@audioamateur oh and lol means laugh out loud

Aston Martin amr-1 is louder have you heard that

C9 one of the greats, C11 the greatest group C racing car ever conceived. The 767b sounded great but that's about it.

SpocksBro I would say the jag xjr-14 is better than the c11 as it won the world sport car championship

Peugeot 905 is better than both.

Mazda its a guitar and Sauber its a bass!

Extreme reliability absolutely could have gone for another 24hrs but terrible fuel economy these things guzzle fuel for the displacement

That's a myth mate. In truth, it was killed by Bernie Eccleston, because apparently Group C cars were more popular for privateer teams than Formula 1 was. If, you claim that the 26B Wankel was "Banned" from Le Mans, then you also have to claim that the Porsche Type 935 twin-turboed Flat-6, as used in the 956 and the 962 was "banned" from Le Mans. Truth is, Group C1 cars got new regs that mandated engines be 3.5 Formula 1 style engines, and Group C2 got shut down. It wasn't the 787B in particular, it was the Mercedes-Dauber C9 and C11, Porsche 956 and 962, and Jaguar XJR-9 that got "banned", because all of their engines weren't legal in the new regs.

@@NotProFishing well its a +7 liter engine, thats why they got banned

@@ShadowFalcon Yes the rule changes were what killed this car but poor mileage was not myth. A rotary engine produces a combustion cycle on every crank rotation therefore twice as often as a "standard" four stroke engine layout.

@@matthewmoilanen787 Well, I doubt the Wankel in the 787B had any worse fuel economy than the engine in the Mercedes Sauber C11 (a 5 liter, twin turbo V8, running silly horsepower). Also my point was, it wasn't the 787B specifically that was killed by the rule changes, but all the great Grp C cars. The only one that soldiered on was actually the Porsche 962, but that got relegated to a class of its own, thanks to even more restrictive rules, (basically, they weren't allowed in FIA's WSC, but they were allowed in the Interserie championship, and therefore the ACO allowed the 962s to compete). They were privateer teams though, and couldn't compete with the works teams (Peugeot, Toyota and Mazda) running in the new 3.5 Formula Grp C.

Yes it does look different. 767b??? Is it a replica the exhaust shield and A few other odds and ends looked different.

miller chassis no. it was the predecessor to the eventual 787B. It’s not like the 787B was mazda’s first attempt at this; it was an evolution, so to speak, from this car

@@millerchassis6119 787B's predecessor

@@woodenhoe not a rotary engine not a mazda

@@millerchassis6119 767B IS a 4 ROTOR racecar build by MAZDA. It's successor, the 787B is built with the 767 as the base platform.

Sigma Projects There is but they race with 13B since Rotary are so light already.

Mazda RX-7 FD Oh coo, is it a league that only uses cars like the 767?

Sigma Projects No 13B engines

Mazda RX-7 FD Ah ok, yea I was thinking more like purpose built race cars that used rotary engines.

its called formula mazda, they race em at bondurant, u can rent one for a day for like a 1000 dollars

This would be the sound of F1 if it was cool

R P NOF1 YES787B

Have you been to F1 race? The cars still sound really good, especially the red bull and force india

@@phill4337 They really don't anymore, let me know when blown diffusers are back. Until then I'm sticking to LMP lmao

@Béla Bá yeah he's actually Martin Brundle

You can like both

why would you even start to like teslas?

Père Grégory maybe because they are fast, secure, easy to repair, reliable, semi autonomous, and comfortable af to drive.

@@vico4981 your wallet is too underrated to even afford one, so your opinion really doesn't matter.

Nicholas Tesla kills cars like these

Bedankt

Cai Allen true! this 767B and the C9 are amazing!

@sw4gr1d you mad bro? What's the point of doing something lik.... oooooh, I get it. Just a hater and lonely dude on the internet.

@sw4gr1d the point of video games is to have fun. I have fun on GT Sport. I dont have fun on Asseto Corsa. Everyone has their preference

Thanks mate !!

other race cars: I constandly win 787B: I was lucky to win 24h of LeMans because all other favorits struggle with accidents and technical problems in the same race, in the rest of the season I did not woi a flower loosing against privat raced old Porsche 962...but the JDM fanboys hype me today not knowing that i was a unreliable slow race car with one day of great fortune

@@nagmashot to bad because mazda made a comeback big time making the Le man's change thier rules about this race, JDM always wins in terms of displacement and reliability

@@dragking9735 I have to laugh my ass off... endurance racing is were JDM fail the most ...were reliability is King..and their they are the worst in the world...

@@nagmashot 3:51

@@nagmashot cry more please

Bedankt,ben blij dat ik ze gekregen heb

Dat vind ik ook sjiek

Bedankt !

might be wrong but I believe the 767B was just a 3 rotor.

@Béla Bá technically, its 2×2 Rotor.

mazda has confirmed the new rotary will be a tiny capacity and used for electric generation

Check out the sauber c9 onboard, that car is like a racing DEMON

Firing order and revs are what make an engine sound great after all

Lok-y Musik 😂😂😂

767B*

@@togera77 I'm sorry you r right

@@LokyMusik no worries :) here's a little trick to differentiate the 2: the 787B used the number 55. the 787 used the 56. and the 767B used the 77 :)

​@@togera77 Ok, thank you I thought the only difference was that the 767 seems to look a little bit smaller, windier or more aerodynamical :) But dont let us pick eggs :) the C Monster 7 Series from Mazda are far off its time :) in Sound Skills and Speed :)

this isn’t a 787B and I believe it only has 3 rotors. Could be wrong on the second point.