Dr. Hanson, you are an amazing teacher especially-especially for those who wants to know why instead of just the formulas. Thank you!
@bradjohnson90883 жыл бұрын
Freedom units gets me every time
@philipcardines14934 жыл бұрын
You are now my master!
@manuboker1 Жыл бұрын
Wonderful Lectures ! Thanks.
@Adam_mohammed_3 жыл бұрын
Great examples!
@ryanisaacson1183 жыл бұрын
i really enjoyed this
@oussama_lb Жыл бұрын
Thank you a lot sir!
@coohjay3 жыл бұрын
i see you with that 4k camera
@mohammadabdulrahman8291 Жыл бұрын
“Freedom units” 😂😂😂😂
@angeloumagboo88483 жыл бұрын
thank youu!!!!
@ishajak94523 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your videos professor! Are you using the Mechanics of Materials book by Goodno and Gere?
@1234jhanson3 жыл бұрын
No...Hibbeler
@CaptainMoroni94 жыл бұрын
Legendary
@harirusamiru28366 ай бұрын
thanks very much you are us sensei
@snorreleretpettersen83113 жыл бұрын
When finding strain in DE, arent you supposed to divide the displacement .0417 by the full length of 60"? Not by length AB as shown. Please correct me if I'm wrong!
@jackbaer64013 жыл бұрын
He was dividing it by the original length of DE which was 36", I know it was weird because AB is also 36"
@multipleorganfailure34492 жыл бұрын
Great
@zachrosedahl281310 ай бұрын
Jeff is my hero
@user-cn3zt6zd3i5 ай бұрын
Thankyou very much for the video professor it really helped a lot, however I have a doubt: at 2:24 how did you know that rod AD rather than bending in a parabolic shape at point B, point D also had a displacement and whole rod AD went down?
@pabloarmijo99742 жыл бұрын
When I divide the force 112 kips over area 0.002 in^2 I get 56000 ksi and the ksi goes away with modulus 29000 ksi to get unitless strain to be 1.93… I don’t understand how Jeff cuts it down to 56 for the stress BC, can someone explain pls 🙏
@deannam1981 Жыл бұрын
it's 112 pounds divided by .002 inches. not 112 kips. 112 pounds/.002=56,000 pounds/in^2 which is 56 kips.
@quangduongminh86982 жыл бұрын
can we just find the strain of BC by using delta (.025) over original length (48'')
@aidtheneedy46402 жыл бұрын
Am having the same question, please if you have an answer to the above question, reply here, thanks :)
@jaguirre91762 жыл бұрын
@@aidtheneedy4640 The (0.025) is the deflection of the beam. not cable.
@enggurux3986Ай бұрын
@@aidtheneedy4640 no becouse all bar moved down including bc cable if the bar didn't move and cable alone stretched we can use delta 0.25
@rrg.r24565 ай бұрын
Why would BC develop strain?
@aungyeoo2753 Жыл бұрын
Sir, May I know what is the book name that you were showing to us?
@wsnekk3290 Жыл бұрын
Mechanics of Materials by Hibbler
@jaguirre91762 жыл бұрын
What if you assume the beam is sagging. Then, the change in D won't be 0.0417.
@deannam1981 Жыл бұрын
sagging goes away with the force of W. you could make the problem longer and calculate the sag before a weight gets put on.
@abdullahal-asmari58473 жыл бұрын
is it ok to not convert to inches?
@rabahalishah5124 Жыл бұрын
yup its totally fine.
@likjjj5849 ай бұрын
When solving for the strain in BC why cant u just do 0.025/48 to find the strain?
@DrChaos-wr2my9 ай бұрын
Because. 0.025 was because bc was lowered because of the weight. Not because it stretched.