Collab of the millennium fr

Matty my man!!!

Ahh! It was you! Haha amazing, how fun-Andra and I absolutely love your videos by the way, huge inspiration! Keep up the awesome work!

knew it was you when I first saw you Lol

Hey there!@@JustineAprilJ

True

somehow i cant do it hav alot of bookmarks and opendtabs on firefox

I was looking for the words to express exactly that 🙂

They should have launched on win and mac at the same time. That way it would have actually change the web and would have been much more beneficial to me who uses, Mac for personal and Windows and Linux for work

@@rushabhchheda2582 their target audience mainly uses MacOS and delaying the launch for so long, just so they can make it for windows from the beginning on, wouldn't have made sense. They did everything right. If you're mad about it, get a mac. It's better in every aspect.

@@rushabhchheda2582it would of delayed it and would of had more bugs for the size of their team but I get your drift

​@@julius.2003I object that Mac is not good in games, Mac is far behind in customisation, Mac inbuilt antivirus doesn't work well, Mac storage management is disgusting and can't change RAM and SSD .... and lack of ports.

Same here!

They have a video about that

@@cartercrick oh great thank you

literally Bing chat, which has been around for about a year now, does pretty much the same thing - searches for you online. comparing with Steve Jobs query from the video, the only diffrence is that Arc opens links automatically, while Bing chat is just providing a list with links to KZfaq

@@cartercrick what is the name of the video? would like to check that out!

That's what I'm curious about, too. I feel like the MAX features are going to end up being a paid subscription. or very limited until you pay for extra credits to use it...

Arc explore = Browse for me, which is working on iOS, I guess they're scaling up to meet demand on macOS?

@@AdrianDemetrescu in the demo they show how the macOS version of Browse for Me is even more powerful, so it's understandable it will take more time

Can we use Arc Explorer today?

​@@SoyFaii Actually Instant Links is the current equivalent!

​@@megazine No in a couple of months! Rewatch the video mate ^^

I feel like this is breaking the 5th wall. Because 4th wall is the audience. Maybe 5th wall is the camera crew who is never ever shown in cinema movies.

Same thought here! I reallly wish they could bring this to Linux asap, they could really use a hand from the community

Idk, it was a feature nobody asked, and i don't really need it in my life at all. and i'm actually curious and come in with open mind and Why badmouthing other companies?, it showed that this "the browser company" are salty, passive aggressive and nasty. and in the future, they'll be as evil as companies they Badmouthed, they already shows the sign that they'll resort to defamation strategy as their core user Acquisition strategy. i think they're all isolated in their own echo chamber where badmouthing their competitor is the norm, but other people just didn't see it that way

@@Vivaildi It is ChatGPT native, but it knows well how to search... its better to overcompensate now and correct in the future, the alternative is horrendous. Its is not censorship, its a bias

I've been using Arc on arch btw.

@@balsalmalberto8086 How is the privacy on arc browser?

It shows. This is about as innovative as Apple's been post 2007, which is none whatsoever. For those who know how to use your average browser this doesn't change a thing. Just click your bookmarks and search for what you want. Takes about as long as it does for Arc to search it for you. Just like with Apple's products, this is overhyped.

There are already tools and extensions that do some of that. And companies have found ways to fit their content to developments in browsers, sometimes for better or worse. They will be just fine.

Average cringe ahh apple fans comment

Some of what you said is true, but I think Arc really is something else than just another browser. Yes, it does take a lot of time to search now and you can probably do it yourself in the same amount of time, but I think it is going to get faster and easier with all the improvement in AI and other stuff involved in recent times. Also, bookmarks are another way to get directly to what you're looking for but you can't have a bookmark for every single youtube topic, can you? As for the fact that google will eat them, it is true. But if they get enough support I think they can sustain. @@WolfHeathen

I agree with @atmosblack4366. For digital interfaces, saying "no ads" is saying no revenue. Saying "no pop-ups" is saying no engagement. Saying "just what you need" means a no experimentation. The internet is not broken, it is fractured. The internet has not stopped innovating, it has calcified around hubs. What TBC is building will yield search power from major engines to themselves. If they want to go back to web 1, they need to find a way to dismantle those hubs without destroying the ecosystem.

was a wanted christmas present for sure..

Spoiler: This future isn't sustainable.

100% agree with you. As Cory Doctorow puts it: "Here is how platforms die: first, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves." We're at step one with Arc.

@@bjrc I’m hoping we stay at step one

bing says hello.. google isn't the only one capable of search

gey

Bot

Thank you for this message helping me find this

Apple is gonna buy them.

@@YadoOrTAE stop

@@clins1994 why?

@@YadoOrTAE just hoping it doesn't happen

@@clins1994 same here !

In the beginning of the internet, you had no expectation a lot of people would see anything you put online. Much less that you would earn ad revenue with it. And yet, people came together and created and shared stuff. People create and share information because it matters *to them*. This will always be true.

@@FabioBrachtPlus Yes sure there will be a passionate few but it is no where near the colossal scale that we rely on today, 99% of it is driven by some sort of incentive

its a bit rough atm... It'll definitely get there but expect it to lose a good bit of the stuff that makes it reallllly good on mac. Can't wait for them to catch up to some of the functionality on mac, they've definitely got a good start so far.

The only advice i can give you is to switch to Mac. Not just for arc, but the general workflows are 10x smoother and there's no annoying spyware and bloatware.

@@amr1t_ Exactly this, as someone who's tried it on both Mac and PC, I was just telling my friends who are on PCs( to whom I've been espousing the amazingness of Arc for months now), not to be so quick to use that beta link I sent them, merely because I don't want them to think how rough the Windows Beta is now is representative of how it actually performs on Mac. I can't wait for the Windows version to catch up to Mac, but right now it is pretty buggy-definitely a stepping stone!

I mean windows is much better if you just play games, so it does have its uses as well. There is no solid answer to which os is better because it depends on the person

@@owentharp6906 true, i think mac is getting competitive there with the new M3 max tho

props for ID that track just off a kick and a 909 hi hat

So you want ARC, which does not create any content or provide any valuable information to the web, to scrape other people’s content and hard work, present it to you on a platter, and get all of the credit for for making your life easier. As someone who has spent tens of thousands of dollars (and tens of thousands of hours) creating valuable content for the web, I can tell you that the talk among most content creators is to either quit completely, or just blast the web with thousands of AI written articles per day (which many are doing) because it’s no longer financial viable to produce properly researched original content. No recipe blogger is spending hours in their kitchen and hundreds of dollars on ingredients to test and refine recipes, not to mention, stage and take professional pictures so that AI powered browsers, search engines, and summarizers can scrape their content and regurgitate it directly to searchers who never visit their websites. Running a professional website is also not free. So if no one is visiting websites, there’s no reason to pay for hosting, maintenance, or the time it takes to update content, create new content, etc. There will be no reason for those websites to exist at all. There’s still hope it doesn’t come to that but in the groups I belong to (we all use the same handful of ad management networks for example), it seems every day more and more are coming to accept that it’s not worth it anymore.

I mean, if it didn't run well in that machine...

​@@g.1771We all know he just wanted to show the world how small his pee pee is

Bot

*leaves*

It’s here!!

To be fair, the security may not be that great. Arc should make a video about their security features to let people know about what they do have in comparison to other browsers

Honestly agreed - especially if Enterprise-wide adoption is part of their long-term monetization strategy.@@goldbrick2563

They scared :)

security? There is no security since it's not open source. Your company is totally right about this choice.

@@aynehancer5959 Only open source software is secure?