2024

Well said 👍

Hahaha good your Turkish😅

Christin Hesse du hast Geschmack

Simon Sebastian 🤭😬Dankeschön...🎈viel Spaß noch...🙋🏻‍♀️

Do u belly dance tho?

müsic ne lan :)

Hungarians are the old Turks. Their roots reach to Atilla. Thats why they are called HUN. It is an ancient Turkish empire. We love Hungarians.

I think the producer is aware of the reference since it's on the cover art.

learning history on YT comment section ;)

Well the Hun aren't proven to have been a Turkic people. The Ottoman rule over Hungary probably explains the Turkish connection still seen in Hungary (like in use of words) more than ancient potential common ancestoral links. Also the name latin Hungaria, came from the Russian word Ugry for Uralic people. Hungarians call Hungary "Magyarország" and their language isn't Turkic aka not in the same language family, which often is a huge clue into if people are (distant) potentially related or not, even though their language also isn't Indo-European. So claiming that Hungarians are old Turks is false and also most people in Turkey are just a mix of Russians, Kurds, Persians, Arabs and Greeks. If you would look how real Turkic people look, you'd see most Turkish people resemble more their immediate neighbors more also in their DNA, most have little genes in common with Turkic people. Only the language is pretty much the same, but their appearance most often if very different. Most Turks from Turkey share regional diseases with Armenians, Mizrahi Jews and Greeks like FMF, which is not a Turkic disease, but prevalent in Turkey, though very rare outside of the Mediterranean region. It's just funny how most Turks feel Turkic though most were just indoctrinated to think they are, whilst it's obvious most aren't.

Actually, at that time, and most of the time, Central Asia is mess of ethnics. There are lots of hordes looks like same people but they are not. Such as Mongol tribes, Hun tribes, Tatar tribes, Turkic tribes etc. Ofcourse the campaing to the europe, persia and middle east has mix of that ethnics (cuz relations, similar culture and same religion) but mainly army has their own ethnic. This is like cursade army, there are frenchman, britishs, germanic people, etc. but there is one goal under religion. Pillaging, subjugate etc. and gaining influence. Gaining influence... Ofcourse the first big campaing to the Europe continent by eastern horse archers(Huns) touched not only the romans, germanic peoples, and frenks etc. but also that touched the other tribes and ethnics at central asia. So... There are Turkic tribes, mongolic tribes are minorly atacked by the side of the main power(Huns). That was great campaing cuz that gave direction to the history. And i write this in my viewpoint, and you write with ur own. So.. Turks that u you mentioned looks like they are looking at my viewpoint or similar but not same and some disagree with. Well, in history never can be decisive fact. cuz we wasn't there. So as a Turk... which lives in Turkey. I can only say sometimes we should make reasoning not just reading sombodys writings. I write this with reasoning. İn internet.. there are lots of c*nts that they think they are historian experts who knows pure truths. Just i said, i write my fact with that reasoning methot. And i agree most of your comment. in Turkey, history lesson in schools not only mention about ottoman periot. They are mentions about centeral asia, Orhun inscriptions, Oghuz tribes and their cultures, Talas battle, adopting İslam, Seljuks and anatolia lands, invasion of mongols, Beylik period, Ottoman period, Balkan wars, WW-1, War of independence and reforms. And infos are very basic, without details. İf u have good school teacher who is knows his history well and u search at books, internet etc. u can then u can get the details. İf u encounter a turk that says "Huns = Turks, so Huns are great warriors.. so my ancestors are badass" he is ignorant and just leave him alone. This is not just about Turks, this is a mass that every faction has. Serbs has, Bulgarians has, Britishman has, İrishman has, Dannishman has etc.. İn our history there are lots of glory, and every country has their own glorious moments. Prideful people... That is good but with ignorace that makes it the false. That is long writing... And lots of redundant explanation about that issue. Have a nice day ok?

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hrh-aryarqrJZ5s.html

arabic acid house?

Yeap, I looked it up just now

not a bad statement but please don't presume arabs and turks are the same. you could simply said "turkish acid house"

We are all people

I'd like to call this genre and many others I've recently enjoyed listening: Either Ethnic House, or Oriental House.

How can you identify music's nationality so precisely?

leftenant_turk the sound is specific to typical Arabic music, actual Turks are of Turkic descent and have a different musical tradition as well as instruments. Turks were of 'nomadic' and shamanic origin so their "music" sounded typical to that of the Native Indians, centering around folk tales. Perhaps you should consider researching instead of vaguely asking; I hope my answer helped.

Sounds like you simply know nothing of Turkish music. It's been a good thousand years since we left the steppe and our music changed a lot since then. Turkish music sounds nothing like Indian music or nomadic.

leftenant_turk I was referring to the shamanic culture-- NOT the sound of the music. Actual Turks are Central Asian and this comment is coming from a Turk. Sounds like your reading comprehension sucks and lack critical thinking. If you knew how to research you would've done some and seen that the music catered as Turkish is a result of cultural fusion. You can NOT delegitimize a culture as old as several thousands years simply because it is no longer honored or celebrated, thanks to too much intermixing and cultural inferiority felt by the newer generation.

leftenant_turk speaking of which.. I will no longer entertain you and disable your ignorant comments. Bye Felicia