Thanks man. Heads up, me and Oliver have done a podcast on Furiosa and Mad Max as a whole, I will be uploading it today, so I'd you like, once you see the movie, feel free to check out the podcast where we discuss it more and where it fits into the Mad Max world. Cheers.

Thank you very much for you comment and continued support of the channel.

Cheers. Enjoy. Once you see it, you can come back as I will be posting my first podcast today discussing in detail the movie and talk about the franchise as well.

@@MFPMapFilmProductions nice one

Thank you very much. Cheers.

Thank you very much. Much appreciated.

@@MFPMapFilmProductions Do you want to join my group chat?

What you are saying makes about as much sense as saying you only listen to a band's first album and that's it because anything else seems like skinning a fox more than once. Miller has been writer director producer for all the Mad Max movies. It's his "world." He's said he'd be happy to make Mad Max films for the rest of his life. It's his thing. This is not like a case of Disney milking Star Wars. Choose any of the others over the original? ...Uh...Yeah. I love the first one but I'd probably take Road Warrior over it, especially when I was younger and first saw the movies. But why do we have to choose any of the others over the original? We have all the ones he has made. If you don't want to see a movie, fine nobody is forcing you to but your "justification" is just nonsensical.

@@AveragePicker You can have your opinion and have all the right to tell it, so do I, there's no problem with it. But if you argue with me I'm going to defend my opinion, because I can. 🤭 1.) "saying you only listen to a band's first album" a.) Bad analogy, because band=director and I didn't say anything about the director. I was talking about a franchise where anything comes after the first movie's success is nothing just skinning the fox again and again and again. The analogy could be correct if the band'd play the same song's different variations and you prefer the original. b.) Bad analogy, because there are plenty of fans of plenty of bands who say their first album (earlier albums) was (were) better than the new ones. So, "your justification is just nonsensical". 2.) "Miller has been writer director producer for all the Mad Max movies. It's his world." True. So? It doesn't mean that ALL of his movies are great. Same thing with Lucas with SW, or Spielberg with Indiana Jones, or Wachowskis with Matrix. Just because it's their worlds, it ain't guarantee that all movies of the franchises are brilliant. Just because the original creator(s) made the new movie it won't automatically be as good and/or as revolutionizing as the original. So, "your justification is just nonsensical". 3.) "This is not like a case of Disney milking Star Wars." The prequels has nothing to do with Disney, it's - using your phrase - "Lucas' world". Still, those three are the worst of the franchise. And I bet my life that the main reason of making those movies was the studio's hope to milking SW again. Literally what my point against the thing called franchise. So, "your justification is just nonsensical". Alien, Predator, Shark, Rocky, Rambo, Psycho, Halloween, The Exorcist, The Omen, Ghostbusters, Transformers, Terminator, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Poltergeist, Tremors, Jurassic Park, Friday the 13th, Scream, Karate Kid, A Nightmare on Elm Street, Hellraiser, Die Hard, Home Alone, Matrix, Saw, Fast & Furious... The way I see it, all of these franchise have something in common. There was a good idea, they made a good movie, but unfortunately they (mostly the studios) felt that they could make more money out of it, so they keep making movies with the same names, sadly with less and less value. I don't care how many views and/or money can franchises make. Only time could tell if any of them is a "classic" or a useless junk; I remember how everybody was drooling over The Phantom Menace back then and we know how it's treated today. When a movie is overhyped, lot of people (mostly "premier-junkies") want to see it and very few of them dare to admit (or worse, CANNOT realize it) that the movie wasn't THAT good (or downright bad). So they tell others how great that movie is and other go to see it, and the hype continues. IMO, Mad Max has joined that group. Many people talk about (and occasionally watch) Mad Max even today, and if I say "I'm a fuel injected suicide machine." or MFP, most of those people know what I'm talking about. Will "Fury Road" or "Furiosa" manage the same? I doubt. If you're disagree, let's come back to discuss it in 2069.