Because office fire controlled demolition only works under a certain set of circumstances (namely the manner in which a building is constructed). Fire is also extremely unpredictable and you need a fuel source, buildings condemned to be demolished rarely have tons of jet fuel or fully furnished offices in them. Think critically.

KZfaq "nist foia 9/11" for the latest declassified video evidence from September 11th, 2001.

This is a surprisingly inept intervention on Mr Shermer's part. It is indeed pathetic if you consider his praise for Pop Mech as a beacon for skeptics. This is particularly disturbing for me, having, on more than one occasion, appreciated his ability to use skeptical analysis on subjects other than 911. I can only hope that Mr Shermer will someday wake the F%@& up and apply his own method more honestly than he has thus far. It's obvious that he simply hasn't done his homework. To help him along, I would strongly recommend that he view the documentary by Massimo Mazzucco called 911: The New Pearl Harbor. It's 5 hours long but that's what is necessary to cover the range of available information concerning the events of that day as it gives a great deal of space to the debunkers' before demonstrating how, once again, they only succeeded in making themselves a little more ridiculous every time they opened their mouths.