No video

Microsoft Access A to Z: Start Here WHY and when should we use Access in the first place?

  Рет қаралды 6,181

Lisa Friedrichsen

Lisa Friedrichsen

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 18
@aweescotsdog8358
@aweescotsdog8358 4 жыл бұрын
A really good wee video about Access. I've been using it for almost a quarter of a century! I was a COBOL programmer back then (as we were known at the time - developer being the preferred term nowadays). I was then seconded into a team that was not under the IT umbrella for a couple of days a week to write extracts of data from our Data General Mini-Computer (a small scale mainframe) and our larger ICL Mainframe (ICL being the UK's answer to IBM at the time). The extracts were to populate end-user applications written primarily in Excel and Access (and some legacy DB2 applications to a lesser extent). The team flattered itself that it was following RAD (or Rapid Application Development) principles (an early precursor of Agile if you are to young to remember). In reality, it was more like rabid application development. They had secured "hero" status by the time I joined the team part-time but it was starting to wane as the support burden of rushed, poorly developed code increased exponentially. As the business had become somewhat dependent on this house of cards, and as I was already a part-time member of the team, I was moved into the team full time. By this time, apart from the occasional contractor, me and my new boss (who had also been in the IT department originally) were the only ones who regularly coded the Data General. Others could do it, and were probably better qualified and more experienced programmers, but the bulk of the work was on the ICL and in new technologies that were intended to replace the legacy systems. As someone who had originally worked in the business in a clerical capacity, rather than having an academic background in computer science, I had been left in the boiler room of mainframe support and it had dawned on me that my career needed a change of direction. While I wasn't going to get to play with all they shiny new toys, moving to a team that wrote things in Access and Excel did seem more interesting than mere COBOL. At that time though, Excel was only on the cusp of adopting VBA. So many of the Excel macros were written in Excel's own macro language. Anyway, this was when first cut my teeth on VBA and SQL. I was taking some Open University courses at the time too, so my awareness of things such as object orientation and relational databases was expanding. Initially, I was very impressed by what the team had done. These guys were geniuses I thought. Well, they'd have to be to understand the truly appalling code that they'd written! It was a downright liability! It was good for me though. I got, what is to this day, my best ever bonus when I saved the whole damned edifice from breaking down. We had five million pounds worth of business riding on what was a complete shambles. It sat on an Access database on a single PC. Supposedly, it was being backed up to the Network every night ... but it wasn't. The disk on the PC crashed and died and we were left with nothing. Except, that we had a copy taken a month or so previously that we had been using for test purposes. From this and recovered data extracts, and others that I created from scratch to plug the holes we were able to restore the situation - but it was a close run thing. I think it is for reasons like my story above - the appalling liberties taken with Access, poor management, the fact that it was often used by gifted amateurs, but not in accordance with sound principles, that Access has acquired such a bad name amongst developers. But I have a deep affection for it. As a now Senior Business Analyst it has been a most faithful friend for a very long time. It is a wonderful and much maligned tool. Of course, as you point out, it has its limitations - although I did once encounter a contractor (who wrote some very elegant code) who claimed that it was perfectly possible to create a system based on Access that could service up to fifty users. I have no idea if this is correct. I mean, surely it all depends on how frequently the users access the system (if you excuse my pun). Anyway, I was mainly a fan of it for what it could do for me, rather than to build applications with. I mainly use it to data mine. Often a SQL server database connected via ODBC using access queries or SQL server queries (stored as pass through queries in Access). Combining the data available from enterprise sources with local data from wherever can be very useful. I do also, on occasion attempt a partial prototype to make a point about what could be although as a BA I gave to tread carefully lest I am accused of stepping in the toes of the solution domain that developers tend to claim for their own (with a certain degree of justification to be fair but that is the problem with BAs who have a background as a code monkey such as me!).
@lfriedrichsen
@lfriedrichsen 4 ай бұрын
You are welcome! See a listing of all of my KZfaqs at learncs.w3spaces.com
@geekmeee
@geekmeee 4 жыл бұрын
Wow, right on time. I needed this review in this day and time of endless apps. I am a 20 year Access enthusiast that needed this review.
@lfriedrichsen
@lfriedrichsen 5 ай бұрын
You are welcome! See all of my KZfaqs organized at learncs.w3spaces.com
@ralphlewis4350
@ralphlewis4350 11 ай бұрын
Hi Professor Lisa, Thankyou so much for this very well explained video. I find your voice and diction great. I am looking forward to watvhing your other videos. Kind Regards Ralph from Australia
@lfriedrichsen
@lfriedrichsen 11 ай бұрын
What a nice message to wake up to this morning, thank you! All of my KZfaqs are organized at: learncs.w3spaces.com
@SmartLearningAI
@SmartLearningAI 10 ай бұрын
Hi Lisa, Where can I get your book from this video?
@lfriedrichsen
@lfriedrichsen 10 ай бұрын
Amazon or cengage.com should both have it.
@TimSmith-df2gz
@TimSmith-df2gz Жыл бұрын
Hi Lisa Great depth of knowledge! I am old school from VisiCalc days. Any one good book for Access you might recommend. Just too many out there for review. Thks
@lfriedrichsen
@lfriedrichsen Жыл бұрын
For Access I'm partial to Illustrated Access by Lisa Friedrichsen. For relational database design go for my Database Concepts textbook. Both are published by Cengage.
@TimSmith-df2gz
@TimSmith-df2gz Жыл бұрын
@@lfriedrichsen thks Lisa I will take a peek
@geraldteigrob2683
@geraldteigrob2683 Жыл бұрын
Hi Lisa. Is there any way you could post a summary of the key points in each video as well as access to the files used in these videos so we can work along with the steps in these videos. I need to have a way to remind myself and remember what each video is about. I will likely end up with an ebook to review this comprehensive study.
@lfriedrichsen
@lfriedrichsen Жыл бұрын
For this i would recommend purchasing my full Access Comprehensive textbook from Cengage, the publisher. It comes with key points, exercises, and data files. Good luck!
@geraldteigrob2683
@geraldteigrob2683 Жыл бұрын
@@lfriedrichsen okay...thanks!
@geraldteigrob2683
@geraldteigrob2683 Жыл бұрын
@@lfriedrichsen I received my book today. Where do I access my data files?
@daxadventure
@daxadventure 2 жыл бұрын
The CENGAGE online books are horrid! They only use serif fonts that are impossible for people with visual impairments to read! On top of that their text looks like it was photocopied because it's blurry. Not to mention their search box is useless and the read to me voices are monotone robots that put you to sleep in minutes. So, thank you for doing a good job teaching it because I wouldn't have learned well from this book!
@lfriedrichsen
@lfriedrichsen 2 жыл бұрын
I agree. Almost all computer textbooks, if moved from print to screen, just don't work very well. The Illustrated Access textbook that I have authored through the 2019 version was always designed to be a physical book because of it's masterful "two-page layout" in the printed version. That layout gives you instructions for a particular task on the left and figures on the right that go with those instructions. So the physical book, laid in front of your keyboard works extremely well because it's like two more screens that your eyes can easily scan between! Ebooks that force you to break up your screen create a mental nightmare because you simply cannot get it all on one screen which means that you lose the tremendous advantage of being able to easily glance at your screen to compare it to the instructions and figures at the same time. Two screens help a lot, but the best solution for the Illustrated Access textbook is to get the physical book. E-books CAN work well, but they have to be designed for that from the beginning, not converted from a book that was designed for paper. To see a great example of a well-designed e-book in another subject check out javascript.info, the Modern JavaScript Tutorial.
@geraldteigrob2683
@geraldteigrob2683 Жыл бұрын
@@lfriedrichsen I see what you mean. I will pay a little more for the actual book for peace of mind.
Microsoft Access A to Z: An overview of what Access can do
8:50
Lisa Friedrichsen
Рет қаралды 101 М.
Microsoft Access A to Z: Relating tables
11:46
Lisa Friedrichsen
Рет қаралды 10 М.
Pool Bed Prank By My Grandpa 😂 #funny
00:47
SKITS
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН
白天使选错惹黑天使生气。#天使 #小丑女
00:31
天使夫妇
Рет қаралды 14 МЛН
SPILLED CHOCKY MILK PRANK ON BROTHER 😂 #shorts
00:12
Savage Vlogs
Рет қаралды 49 МЛН
Microsoft Access A to Z: Creating tables
7:34
Lisa Friedrichsen
Рет қаралды 9 М.
How to use Microsoft Access - Beginner Tutorial
31:07
Kevin Stratvert
Рет қаралды 3,1 МЛН
Is Microsoft Access Still Viable in 2024?
21:19
Advantage Applications
Рет қаралды 40 М.