Eh. The first Sinister was ok at best.

The Happyman A fellow Okie! 😁

Same. Loved it.

yep, he looks very much like the mask of mick thomson, the lead guitarist^^

+thescaredshadow the moment i saw the trailer i knew that it was going to fall apart... at least the guys behind john wick did the action for hitman... its something

George Pearson of course they did! Just watch the trailer .

yeah, that's ... like .. mmmmm.. not greatl But seriously, why make an action movie based on a stealth game?

Wow shitty to MEGA SHITTY MOVIE bummer

The first time I watched Sinister what struck me and caused laughter was the fact that the demon creature looked like he belonged in a mayhem cover band as his makeup looked exactly like the corpse paint makeup that their first singer Death used to wear on stage.

@@Hammerhead547 oh yeah the one who shot himself and a photo of the suicide used for a album cover

Easily. You call out the stupidity of the plot and the script

***** to be fair most modern horromovies are remakes or gore bath torture porns. or found footage. some time they are scary

HoboJoe83 Who cares? They make money like nobody's business.

+HoboJoe83 Anytime I see a horror movie TV ad where all they do is show the audience reacting to it, I just know it's gonna be jump-scare reliant crap.

+HoboJoe83 Nightmare on Elm Street 2 and Friday the 13th part will graciously disagree.

+The Great Red Dragon 87 Elm Street 2 sucks big time

There's a reason you feel uneasy in settings like that. Never know what you could run into- insane homeless person, rabid animal, or just fall through the floor because the building is derelict. Things like that are the deep psychological fears we all share that horror movies target by using spooky isolated derelict houses. It's immediately uncomfortable on a deep level.

Thank you for your thoughtfulness and kindness. But those old buildings do creep me out. That are abandoned and look gross from being worn. That it just creeps me out seeing them. I don't watch horror movies, I'm not a fan of shitting myself in fear or getting a rush from fear. But I do enjoy the Cinema Snob (and co.) review such movies. Those abandoned, worn buildings as always scared me and I never been in one ever! It could be dangerous so fuck exploring one of them! It's like a ghost town. It doesn't have a purpose so it should be taken down. That's my logic at least.

buzzcrushtrendkill lmao

I mean this is probably more entertaining

+TheRealConcertKing When they said costume death metal band, I thought of Detroit Metal City.

+TheRealConcertKing I just remember the RedLetterMedia review where Mike just summarizes it with, "Ethan Hawke and his family are being menaced by a member of Slipknot" LOL

+theblocksays well, i thought the killer in american horror story: Asylum looked like a lost member of slipknot too...the bands comes around

+theblocksays He really does look like one of the members of Slipknot

Roy wore a jumpsuit in Part V.

cool im glad hes got his own channel hope it does well and he sticks with it .

***** do you no why blip demised in the first place ? i dont think everyone knows he has his own channel at the momment he only has 15 thousands + subs ive been looking for his videos a couple of months now . i just thought he had taken a holiday or something .

***** ok thanks for the info

its his new channel

culwin You mean Sinister 2: Electric Bughuuluu?

@Amariie Maerthos I'm waiting for the sequel where Bughuul tricks Deputy So and So into moving into the wrong house so he can attack him. Sinister: The Revenge

+BadAssMutha006 We know it's John Carpenter. We were talking about the writer. That we actually got wrong, it was Drew McWeeny that wrote it.

Ah. I see. Heh. McWeeny.

*pat pat* Sure they are.

Your opinion was childish and not worthy of being seriously engaged.

You're entitled to your hilariously awful opinion. Carry on.

Sinister was for me a tiring exercise in showing over telling that relied too heavily on the snuff films for exposition when they could have easily worked them into the story in a more creative way like using the sons night terrors as a window into the horrors of the films, sinster 2 was trying so hard to be Hellbound: Hellraiser 2 by filling in all the missing lore from the first movie. The problem is that the lore they came up with was tedious and uninteresting which makes the villain nothing more than a pedestrian boogieman who does things for reasons that amount to "well it's that time I guess I'd better find a child to terrorize and possess so I can feed on their soul" as if it's an act of contractual obligation rather than an act of horror.

+Seargent363 Me too.

***** Saved me 13 dollars where I'm at.

thescaredshadow Damn! That's how much I had to pay to watch Rifftrax Live: Sharknado 2 in Houston!

ackbarfan5556 I live in the Houston area too and at places like the Edwards, it can cost 12.38 a ticket (ordering online at least).

***** HOLY! THAT'S WHERE I WENT TO AS WELL!

+SN4K3EATER64 Rotten Tomatoes and sites like it are just A form of RECEPTION. They do not nor are intended to actually gauge the success of films, financial or otherwise, it's all about collecting reception from any who contribute. Any sensible fan of movie critics knows that it's best to watch the movie for yourself and make your own opinion and not go to critics just to conform your opinion to the critics'. That said, that doesn't mean you can't refer to the opinions of others to compare or contrast, and a site like Rotten Tomatoes is just a place to do that. There have been times where Brad and friends have disagreed with what Rotten Tomatoes has put out, so they do not see it as a end-all, be-all source.

+SN4K3EATER64 Given how we're bringing it up to say that "when I think 4% bad, I think of things way worse," that technically is us saying that it doesn't matter. Rotten Tomatoes is simply a source for what a majority of critics think about something. If we weren't saying the term "according to rotten tomatoes," we've be saying "according to critics," since that's what we're talking about. We disagree with it all the time, but that doesn't mean we have to completely ignore what a critic consensus on the movie is. I think given how many times we disagree with what a majority of critics say proves that we DO go to the movies just to watch them and not simply march in lockstep with what critics think.

...they do watch the movies.