Thanks nilok, but so can any of us! Head over to today's sponsor Qiskit to get started on YOUR OWN Quantum Computing adventure! qisk.it/jabrils

@@Jabrils Thanks, I'm not that confident in my programming, but I'll give it my best!

@@Jabrils I Hate Scientist that doesn't use Quantum computers to simulate Fusion Waves in a Fusion Reactor if you did that we would have Unlimited Energy Quick. If you simulate an AI on the quantum Computer think about it it could learn from itself and make a better version of itself to help us. Btw Your Videos are really great. Where can you find Scientist to ask Questions to???

@@Drefar If it were that simple it'd already be done. Let the scientists do their thing.

@@uiomancannot7931 I haven't heard anyone actually trying to do it so I hate them till they do Because it seems Logical to actually do it.

hi :0

Yeah, this is pretty epic

pog

Dani

I fuckin see you everywhere how do you do this

And those living at the bottom of a revine

Hmmmm

And those villages _just_ above the ocean with their semi underwater towers

I had one generate in the ground

He said "Hmmmmmm" if you're curious

Pretty much actually

Galaxy brain

Cheche, thanks for the joke :)

Lmao

Well yes, but actually yes, but actually no, but actually yes, but actually no

Relatable, have a nice day.

Does he have enough for the class is the real question

Oh shoooot

lmaoo

Lol

Whot u here m8

Whot u here m8

Whot u here m8

Whot you here m8

Stop saying the same thing. Edit: am here m8

I would say 50’s

@@kolmercm That's fair

Yeah but progress is 100 fold

Keep dreaming in sci-fi world Quantum computing can never happen I bet Edit-flat earther will keep dreaming and will then start trolling internet threads with their wet ass

@Guy Panzerboss • There is a world market for only 50 quantum computers. There is no reason anyone would want a quantum computer in their home. We’ll never see the quantum computer equivalent of the Apple II home computer. Apple will never come out with a quantum computer. 640 qubits ought to be enough for anybody. Who the hell wants to hear a quantum computer talk, play music, view images and videos, or engage in a video chat or playing porn in 4 k? Every useful quantum computing feature that can be invented has already been invented. Quantum computers will never run at room temperature. There is no reason that any small business would want a quantum computer. There is no reason that any small or medium size enterprise would want a quantum computer. Quantum computers will never be used as desktop computers. Quantum computers will never be used as laptop computers. Quantum computers will never be used in handheld devices (tablets, phones, wearable computers.) The idea of a quantum computer in your pocket is a pipe dream. Your car (truck, bus, train, plane) will never contain a quantum computer. Quantum computers will never completely replace classical computers. Quantum computers will never cost less than $1 million. Quantum computers will never be able to do everything that classical computers can do. Quantum computers won’t be practical for at least another decade. Today we haven’t got a full-fledged quantum computer. Some companies suggest to test many prototypes with the quantum “logic” imitation, but in fact, all of them are emulators The fact is that algorithms that can run on today’s quantum computers aren’t much use. One of the main algorithms, for example, makes the quantum computer churn out random numbers. That’s great for demonstrating quantum supremacy, but for anything else? Forget it. Quantum computers will never fully replace “classical” ones like the device you’re reading this article on. They won’t run web browsers, help with your taxes, or stream the latest video from Netflix or opening your account in pornhub(isn't bad?)

He probably doesn't though. He probably records his voice lines and then plays them back as he films himself so that he can match all of his facial expressions and gestures to what he is saying.

@@kadeonines5178 ok but imagine sitting in a room listing to yourself talk while makeing gestures at a camera

@@timelordwarrior4394 Yes but that's not strange.

@@timelordwarrior4394 i hate it it almost made me want to stop watching

@@hlundy9997??

Lmao 😂

Through our screens

First Jabrils vid i saw i was too noncomittal to click the video, so it just played muted in the thumbnail with closed captions. Made the whole separation of voiceover and facial expressions he does even more surreal

You have a quantum computer?

oml

lol binary dna creepypasta

@User we but they didnt make it with cpu WHY

@User its slow

That’s if we are all alive in 10-20 years and or society isn’t collapsing from the brutalization of humanity and the planet.

@@ZI66640 That is a possibility

@@ZI66640 Lmao. Humanity is not ending in 10-20 years guaranteed. So naive loool

@@edenbeats I mean, if it does we won't know or care. So that's an easy stance

@@edenbeats i mean maybe it is going to end pretty soon i think of that

its called voice overs?

@@haylanhead5820 But he is doing a voice over of his own commentary

@@superfire6463 it’s weird fs but it adds some comedic value to it

More like acting his voice.

​@@killertrill8020 it's a very interesting video style. I approve

He couldn't afford the mouth animations. So it's PS1 style speaking.

Because he's voiced by a white man

he has ascended in the quantum world in which he could speak without open his mouth. he both speaking and not speaking. Schrodinger's mouth.

@Kris dear god what has he done

@@dihydrogenmonoxide6748 lmfao schrodingers mouth. i actually laughed out loud. underrated af

I thought they we're just theoretic

@@atonedudeatsnotsubscribed8313 Yeah right, well last I heard countries were sharing their quantum computers so I assumed they were still in the phase of football field sized computers :P

@@Perseagatuna right now they are pretty big, and I bet the same thing is gonna happen, making them smaller and smaller!

quantum computing won't ever become mainstream in the way you think. a quantum computer will never replace your conventional desktop

@@plsdontbanmeagainyoulibtards well yes thats true the only network we have right now uses ground cables to communicate with other computers, it wont be conventional probably, but it may still replace the desktop eventually with enough work

@@gidgids hold up

oh hi joel!

@@gidgids Nice

Yes! i still can't believe how little attention this fact is getting. He got sponsored by a quantum computer company!

That is huge

@@Doomroar the company knew that he is a freaking genius

Lmao he got sponsored by ibm a few(?) videos ago

@Woofless CDQ really? making fun of someones spelling on the internet? thats a new low my guy :/

You should have been here when he had the AI making it look like his mouth wasn't moving when he was talking in videos.

@@MinistryOfMagic_DoM I laughed from that, it's his iconic style

I didn't notice. Huh.

No, but I really want to talk about how he hasn't finished that bag of snacks at the end of the video

HFY be like.

some TierZoo reference. appreciate it

lol

It does still need something to train on, so builders that are designing something to train on are still necessary in order to actually start generating things

years of academically training wasted

Builders: Years of academy wasted

Does it run Doom?

technically, if it is compiled with right tools, probably

God dammit

Nope

*make

The Blacksmith In a ravine:

And a ravine blacksmith house

The library 60 blocks up the side of a cliff:

Hes telekinetic ?

99.9% of things run best on classical computers, but we may have a small dedicated quantum chip in future CPUs to handle specific situations (like random generation etc)

@@alibyte at the moment yeh. You could say the same about multi and single core cpus when everything was made for the single core. It will change over time.

“Carefully he’s a hero”

Or a github

Imagine being ab;e to explode a 10 x 10 x 10 chunk of TNT WITHOUT 1FPS lag spikes for 5 minutes!

100 blocks is only 6 minecraft chunks. Minecraft can already far exceed that render distance. This is already possible today! Also, a recent update to java made exploding TNT much more performant. Lag spikes for 5 minutes? Try 5 seconds

minecraft is not a good game to represent games of our time when it comes to performance. can’t blame them though. even though its technically a AAA game, everything from the deeply embedded core parts of the engine to the very decision to use java instead of something not as terrible was made by a single guy that was bored on his lunch breaks. no one (especially not notch) expected the game to come far at all, so i can see why performance was probably not notch’s number one priority.

@@albingrahn5576 I wonder if Infiniminer would've been more performant, had it blew up instead of Minecraft

@@albingrahn5576 which is why Java runs slower than Bedrock in most cases. Java Edition uses mostly one core, while Bedrock Edition uses multiple cores, therefore increasing performance. Still though, that doesn't make Bedrock Edition a better version of Minecraft lol. Also, a good company to represent current games is Rockstar imo. I have no clue how Rockstar makes such good looking games run on low-end machines.

That reminds me of how computer programming was described as being in the 60s and 70s for classical computing...

They will make compilers then all will be well.

How do you even debug a quantum algorithm ?

@@DistortedV12 You rewrite the whole thing lol

@@DistortedV12 With fire

Yes extremely fast! However, to make it viable for mass production or commercial use, we are still far behind the curve. I feel as space brings more engineers and more startups support the industry it may be faster. There are still many technical restrictions we'd have to face like error-correction is number one on the list. I am hopeful we'll have commercial ready applications built on QC in 10 years.

I mean it kinda has been. People have been thinking about this long before being able to build them. The first recorded use of the word qubit was in 1994.

were at about the 50 60s point so expect 10 years before we get to reliable qx86-64

​@@EternalDensity Theories of quantum computers date all the way back to the 60's. So although the first use of qubit was in 1994 people have been talking about the same concept but with different wording for decades prior.

Truth

Tooth

*anger*

**angrey**

He has quite a lot of subscribers, 391k is nothing to scoff at.

this.

It's not even assembly, it's like using punch cards

@@ishdx9374 Give it 10-20 years. We'll be writing in Quantum Python

Microsoft has already made a programming language for quantum computing called Q#. It looks similar to C# and F#.

@@NikorasuChan Cool.

Pog

He didnt explain how a quantum computer will speed up this algorithm tho. He just said its based on collapsing wave functions.

@@tomatenbomber8830 it's because you can do those various tasks in parallel

@@btoiscool but does he want to parallelise generating chunks? Or does he want to parallelise the block subtraction for different blocks? Maybe im just big stupid :D

@@tomatenbomber8830 its because you can entangle the state of each block, so once one block collapses into a state all the other blocks will collapse with it, hence giving it a "parallelism". It's kind of like an instantaneous domino affect, instead of checking the state of a block and then changing it's neighbor classically

I checked out your profile. Amazing content

Nice hills, I’ve always felt like the scale was off in Minecraft, but you nailed it :)

copyright strike this fool and then extort $10,000 out this homie

@@MrLiquidxIce your the problem of humanity

@@thefirstandlast5739 It's a joke

Maybe the water would look normal

@@gamertardguardian1299 idk what water you seeing but of thousands of planets I've visited the waters fine

@@potto1488 On Xbox it is horrid, the surface of the water just looks horrible

Lol by the time Quantum computing is a threat to blockchain, we will have Quantum resistance algorithms for the blockchain. Check out QRL to learn more how they are leading the charge with it

@@Mt.Trashmore Yes. Not necessarily your password, but you can reverse engineer getting your private key from your public key in the matter of minutes or even hours wherewith today's classical computer the chances to crack it is less than 1/1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. Even if current computers can crack it, it'd take thousands or tens of thousands of years.

@@tycooperaow You’re Right, there is a lot of work on quantum resistent hashing going on. If it ever becomes a threat, hopefully there will be a quantum resistent fork of the blockchain.

@@edsanville absolutely! Quantum computers of today can barely run proper to-do list applications let alone be used to brake the world’s most common hash functions like md5, RSA, or SHA-256.

if you are scared, it's time to sell, take your gains, enjoy life.

actually , it was did You see minecraft on a quantum computer ? cause i didn't ...

@@ThermaL-ty7bw it would be such a waste to use procedure generation on a quantum computer. People need to learn that they are not just improvements on regular binary computers, they are their own style of computing that is not compatible for gaming. They are useful for predicting outcomes to situations, aka you put one input into the computer and get 1, or 2, or 3, or... solutions. See how that doesn't work for games? If you were to shoot a man in CoD the computer would have to calculate every situation in which you didn't and did hit him just to then compute the most likely result and display that one instead of a simple: did player 1 point at player 2 with no obstruction when trigger was pulled?

@@generalbandege1184I mean that’s CoD. Something simple like Stardew Valley would not be that complicated.

@@SavonSays You're missing the point. At the moment, quantum computing is significantly less efficient at things like games than classical computing is. The reason is exactly what the previous guy was talking about with CoD, but he simplified it like crazy. It's not only calculating the various probabilities involved in you shooting at somebody, it has to calculate *everything.* Every texture, every mesh, every player interaction including every frame of movement of the rigidbody, collisions, camera, I mean *everything.* Stardew Valley would be the same problem, it would be far less efficient than using a modern classical computer, and that's not even to touch on *cost* efficiency, so why not just use classical computing? This is because quantum computing operates on two states at once, and it has to calculate *all* of those probabilities to settle on one of those states before it can execute. Classical computing operates on *one* of two states at any given moment, and these states are nearly always explicitly decided during development and that's what loads on execution. Unless you're using procedural generation or some other RNG sort of system, there is *no* probability crunching in classical computing. Quantum computing would be very effective for highly advanced and varied procedural generation, but you'd still hit that brick wall the second you tried to implement the rest of a game with quantum computing. Now what makes quantum computing cool isn't that it's the next level for gaming, because getting to the efficiency we have now with classical computing for that kind of use is a minimum of a few decades off, and classical computing is still progressing too so by the time it catches up to current classical computing power, that classical computing power will be far ahead again. No, what makes it cool is that quantum computing comes with its own advantages that DO far outweigh classical computing. A lot of GPS type software uses cloud based quantum computing to calculate route now. Why? Well with classical computing, your choices are that it can either only crunch one path at a time fairly quickly, or swap between calculating multiple paths one "chunk" at a time. E.G. you can calculate one path 100% of the way through quickly and move on to path two, or you can calculate one path to say 1%, then calculate path two to 1%, back to path one to 2%, and so on. With a quantum computer it can calculate both of those paths at the exact same time to figure out which one is the fastest route, because of the superposition state they operate on. Quantum computers are MUCH faster and more thorough at calculations like this. Another example is in the medical field, decoding proteins. A quantum computer can do so much faster than a classical computer could, because that superpositioned state means it's calculating all probabilities at the same time.

@@NexuizIncarnate1 I’m not gonna look at the essay but I was exaggerating as well. I already know that it’s not really made to code games and you’re better off using something else.

The effect doesn't work for me tbh

short anwser: probably no Long Anwser: if you recreate entirety of minecraft and all the mods in python i thing you could do it

@@vladimirvikentije5202 its a joke nobody said its possible

@@vladimirvikentije5202 you don't recreate mods in python

Yesn't

@@vladimirvikentije5202 but python's s l o w

omg that's going to be so fun

We could install nintendo emulator and other stuff like

2050 is too long. Maybe 2030s at most

@@riennn2 Would that mean that a quantum computer would have to have a specifically written algorithm to force it to act like a classical computer? That would be the dumbest, stupidest, and most awesomely cool use for a quantum computer I've ever heard....... I LOVE IT! XD

what's plausible (but requires some technological leaps) is that you'll have a classical computer with a normal cpu, but just like it has a gpu chip, it'll have a quantum chip with a few qbits for the things you can write a better algo in quantum than in classical.

You can do that with normal computer. Creating games is fun. The only limit is your imagination

@@MidnightBloomDev well yeah obviously, quantum computing just makes the process way faster and easier

Qiskit Summer School?

@@tycooperaow No its an 8 month thing through The Coding School

@@nodoxplz ahh I know what you talking about. Is it the one that start at the beginning of 2021?

@@tycooperaow It starts sunday and goes until May lol

@@nodoxplz I applied but I did not get in.

Pretty sure he is accessing a cloud of sorts that runs on a Quantum computer

He did not run a quantum algorithm on a regular computer. He ran a quantum _inspired_ algorithm on a regular computer, and is _working_ on converting it to an actual quantum algorithm to run on quantum computers, which would do it significantly faster. And the main benefit of quantum computers is other functions that aren't as accessible classically.

Its like CPU vs GPU, they are simply not the same (quantum does and will eat ass at things that classical excels in)

Nothing. Regular computers and quantum computers can compute the exact same things. Only that a quantum computer can do some things enormously faster.

They have! & its called Qiskit qisk.it/jabrils

LMAO

@@Jabrils qiskit isn't a language it's a library ahah

Silq and Q#

no

yes

yes AND no

facts!

"If you think you don't understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics." - me

what.

yes, becuase you could have a map one third the size that is still just as enjoyable?

Python probably works as the scripting language while C++ takes care of the engine side of things. This allows you to get projects out the door as fast as possible without having to sacrifice performance by much since you’re using lower level language for your engine.

the quantum computer is fast, the computer interface that let the user feed datas to the quantum computer tho is a regular one, it has to be very simple and reliable, as quantum processor don't work like a classic one, so whaterver language you use on the computer controling the quantum computer is irelevant (here they use python cuz open source and a lot of people know it)

@@arixfurette7310 That's one of the main reasons why they are using python. There are talks to use Julia, or Silq as a quantum computing programming language later on once more development comes of the space, but that won't be for a while.

Richard Feynman

@@NMPWN thx bro

@Etg Sur KZfaq he still not fully understand that tho

God:

Obama

among

Actually, this is a really good idea

@@Jabrils Appreciated, brother 👌

As far as my limited understanding of quantum states goes it probably is. As I recall you can have multiple states at once when dealing with quantum computers and with music you can play multiple notes at once on some instruments. So a music sheet is just as good as any other method for visualizing multiple states in my opinion.