Came here after watching your written and voiced video on space dock. Great job! Enjoyed both videos and appreciate your efforts!

These videos are some of the best I have seen explaining sci fi ships

I think it's quite clear - Mars 1 left the bulk of the ship in orbit and only the command pod landed. The pod was damaged and without computers, couldn't make it back to orbit for rendezvous. After leaving Mars, the combined crews aboard Mars 1 ERV docked with the rest of Mars 1 and returned home.

I hope you'll discuss about the Alexei Leonov from 2010: The Year We Make Contact.

I forgot this movie existed. Thankfully. There were a couple out at the time, one of them used ESA's logo since NASA refused to let them. Of course the film-makers didn't bother changing the script so had American astronauts and American references, they just slapped ESA badges on things.

I'd like to know why the centrifuge needed to spin independently from the rest of the craft. It'd simplify construction to just rotate the entire vessel around its long axis as they'd need to halt rotation to perform any serious maneuvers anyway.

Space dock Sent me and boy am I glad he did. Your content is amazing dude!

what about the Hermes in The Martian?=v=

That movie is great

Nice video and well explained

I get this is a 3 month old video but im curious, would there be any chance you could do a breakdown of the Endurance from Interstellar or the Hermie's from The Martian? Also that your channel is willing to break down realistic hard scifi spacecraft is a really cool, seeing as most other channels like this only focus on stuff from starwars startrek or halo

The whole spinning portion of a spaceship bugs me. Why put up with all the added challenges of a spinning and non-spinning portions? Just maintaining a pressure seal between moving and non-moving parts is near impossible. Undoubtably there would need to be electrical connections too. The only realistic spacecraft I’ve seen recently was in Netflix’s Stowaway. The entire ship was spun for gravity. Far simpler inter-connects and way larger diameter requiring far lower RPM. The diameters portrayed in 2001 A Space Odyssey, The Martian and even Interstellar would cause problems for the astronauts’ inner ears.

Oh, your hooj. the new guy on spacedock. Not gonna lie I'm finding your voice more and more enjoyable.

Great video

Probably not thoroughly taught through design, but still a nice one. For the backtrip from Mars to Earth, i can immagine RECONNECTING with the rest of ship (and possibly have in there some much juice to GET to Earth. Me personally prefer the design of two tethered spaceships, instead of one humongous drumm. The drumm I would agree with would be much bigger and probably on much differently oriented starship (more like Nauwoo/Behemoth/Medina station from expanse franchise).

ah voice id great way to hijack a spaceship like data did to the enterprise when he copied picards voice and codes.

Wow. your video makes me realize this movie wasn't thought through very well.

Make videos about ships from the movie Oblivion

4:15 I didn’t realize Major Lorne was in Mission to Mars.

Could you do the Messiah from Deep Impact?

This isn’t the one from that horror movie was it? Red Planet or whatever?

these special effects are from 2000????? what???

KZfaq: hooji has replied to your comment. Me: "...what? My comment seems to have been deleted." lol but no I'm not on twitter. I'll just check back more. I tinkered with the notification settings though so I SHOULD see all your videos now.

Everyone knows that water on mars can only be bad news

The Martian + aliens - planetside perspective.

the MARS II spacecraft is actually a viable design for a real MARS manned spacecraft . . .

Is it just me or is "Mission To Mars" a little too similar to "2001: A Space Odyssey"? The Mars II kinda has basic design similarities to the Discovery and the space suits on both movies look the same.