By making accessible the treasure of knowledge to whole community of learners, you hv demonstrated how a dedicated professor can realise his essence!
@gopikantha44606 жыл бұрын
Historical materialism at 25:40 Alienation at 35:50.......
@DS-4-ut4 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@akkysexy5 жыл бұрын
This is how a teacher in this digital era gets respect which is not very common for online teachings.
@gaibuanlunggangmei8397 жыл бұрын
Nice lecture sir
@Thamu63 жыл бұрын
Tq sooooo much sir.... Greatly helpful for UPSC👩✈️👩✈️
@swatisingh41667 жыл бұрын
very nice explanation.
@mohdilyas74736 жыл бұрын
Very very useful sir
@debabratadey9232 жыл бұрын
Grateful for your lectures
@asish6236 жыл бұрын
Good speech
@Toadwizard8657 жыл бұрын
YO U GOT HELLA JUMPCUTS FAM DOPE VID
@rsrandhawa7868 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir
@Enlightenwithshubham5 жыл бұрын
Great lecture thank you sir
@nehabharti60553 жыл бұрын
Thnx sir for the clear my all douts
@riteshtiwari7312 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Sir 🌸🙏🙂
@umabhardwaj69104 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for wonderful explanation of Marxist philosophy
@sunwado3 жыл бұрын
Very good lecture
@KaisarasAR6 жыл бұрын
The best explanation of marxism I've ever heard!
@franciskm41443 жыл бұрын
Alienation is explained in Paris manuscripts 🎉
@sureshpatra6724 жыл бұрын
Very good sir
@DS-4-ut4 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot, Sir!
@anushavp76353 жыл бұрын
Anusha VP
@angeljacob99363 жыл бұрын
ANGEL JACOB
@areenanfee77673 жыл бұрын
Areen Anfee
@semeenavj6333 жыл бұрын
Semeena vj
@heberpelagio71614 жыл бұрын
The success of Stalin - the man who used to boast that he conquered the United States "from the plow to the atomic bomb in just a generation" - compared to Gorbachev's failure shows that a socialist economy is unable to function with a minimum of efficiency without requiring a massive dose of political violence. In an attempt to reform a decadent regime, Gorbachev moved faster with the process of economic opening in the hope of removing the predictable resistance that the Soviet bureaucracy would create to economic reform measures, as CABAL proved with the failed attempt. coup d'état in August 1991 - which ended up precipitating the final crisis of socialism and the dissolution of the USSR itself Its Chinese parallel - Deng Xiaoping - adopted a logic diametrically opposed to that of Gorbachev: it prioritized the achievement of economic prosperity (adopting in practice capitalism) precisely to delay any attempt at political opening, as was evident with the acceleration of the economy. reforms after the Tiananmen Square massacre. It is important to note that it was Karl Marx himself who, in his Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, discerned the scenario in which the conditions for a social revolution process are formed, describing it as follows: "At a certain stage in its development, the material productive forces of society contradict existing production relations or - which is only their legal expression - with the property relations in which they have been active until then. From the forms of development of the productive forces, these relations are transformed into fetters of them. So, it is a time of social revolution." (Reproduced according to MARX, K. Preface to the Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, organized by Florestan Fernandes and published under the title K. Marx: Theory and historical process of the social revolution, In Marx & Engels, Great Social Scientists Collection, History, vol. 36. São Paulo: Ática, 1983. p. 232. Commemorative edition of the centenary of Karl Marx's death) By rejecting the pursuit of profit maximization as an instrument to stimulate innovation, socialist countries ended up condemning themselves to obsolescence. Thus, they lost the chance to incorporate the productivity gains made possible by technological progress. That is why the capitalist countries managed to provide a greater rise in the standard of living of their population, even without pursuing the egalitarian ideal. Therefore, until the “final crisis of socialism” (to paraphrase K. Marx's own definitions once again), it was only a matter of time. But religious fanatics do not give up on their faith, even against the indisputable proof of the facts, which completely refute it!
@ongobongo83333 жыл бұрын
socialism is far more efficient than capitalism, what the fuck are you talking about?
@ongobongo83333 жыл бұрын
>By rejecting the pursuit of profit maximization as an instrument to stimulate innovation, socialist countries ended up condemning themselves to obsolescence. Thus, they lost the chance to incorporate the productivity gains made possible by technological progress. then why are they the world leaders in innovation? why did the soviets win the space race?
@ongobongo83333 жыл бұрын
pursuit of profit maximization is an instrument not of innovation but of stagnation, look at the USA
@06_me_soumyajyoti_ghanti322 жыл бұрын
1. You have the wrong concept. For the fall of the soviet union, I recommend you to study Collapse: The fall of the Soviet Union by Vladislav Zubok. 2. You cannot blatantly claim China to be a capitalist economy. It needs to be studied over a period of time. The introduction of capitalist forces in the Chinese economy, as you have mentioned was just a phase (You can draw its parallel from the New Economic Policy (NEP) by the Lenin administration in late 1921).