Yipee

Awesome!

Gay pfp

​@@user-kc6qr5eo1k bro's crazy, how can a chess piece be gay ?

Ah ok. I thought it seemed like a reupload

Light Infantry carries everything on their backs.

Same way a normal rifle platoon does, distribution

There's nothing "Light" about Light Infantry. I bet each soldier carry more than the one in mech infantry.

We shared the load , it was pretty crappy in the mountains of Afghanistan. 2/75 01-04 I personally carried 15 30rd mags plus one in the rifle and 3 mags for the crappy pistol , that was the minimum I would carry

Unpopular E1s, I'd imagine.

You can thank CAG for that. I don’t think there’s an official designation for that setup, but it’s outside of normal SOCOM issue due to the Department of the Army denying the issuing a full size pistol other than the M9/M17. Jeff Gurwitch of Modern Tactical Shooting discusses some of the issues and politics around the Glock 17 in SOCOM. If I had to guess, those were Battalion purchased outside of the procurement stage.

75th Bn. has three times as many pipe hitters as CAG and ST6 combined. They were also continuosly deployed for twenty years straight. Last but not least, they conducted raids on their own, with partner forces and other SOCOM/JSOC teams. It's only natural they have the highest tally on enemy combatants killed in the entire USSOCOM. That and the fact that their success rate is one of if not the highest in the entire US military. Let's not forget that even during Gothic Serpent they completed their mission and extracted the HVTs.

I did 3 year long deployments with 2nd Bat during GWOT in 4 years, we were very busy during that time and I got out during the beginning of the surge in 08. Then I went on to become a contractor

lol. They are only the most lethal to each other. And no. They are not the most lethal DA. Which if you knew anything DA is not the term used since about 2017. But I digress, 75th is a bunch of kids that did 19days of PT. They are the kings of fratricide and failure.

I've never seen any AOB, SOTF, CJSOTF, or SOJTF tally kills. 100% Rangers are legit, but plenty of dudes out there putting them down. I've also seen 75th guys sitting in hangers waiting for QRF call while everyone else in the streets.

@@tigercub2468 I never said the 75th themselves tallied kills. But when GWOT started goong South, particularly in Afghanistan, all combat troops were ordered to report enemy casualties as the old Vietnam War mentality of "We're killing a lot of them=we're winning" started to be used to continue the war. Truth is, they conducted more raids than everyone else, hence they got more insurgents than everyone else.

yep

Couldve been the ultimax if they actually improved it instead of sitting on their asses and waiting for new constant recoil guns to hit the market

​@@thetigerii9506Ultimax is drum or mag-fed, not belt-fed, so harder to carry rounds for it. Great for short duration mission profiles if you can hump the drums and have compatibility with AR mags.

@@LRRPFco52 they finally made the newest one belt feedable, but it is a bit heavier than the old versions, which somewhat defeats the purpose of being a lightweight lmg

@@thetigerii9506 I've been following the Ultimax100 for over 30 years. Which model are you referring to?

ALL THE WAY

AATW

"RAMIREZ, PROTECT THE BURGAH TAWN!"

*Proceeds to grab Private Allen and shove him towards the firefight*

Sua Sponte

NSW and 75th have actually just upgraded their Mk48 Mod 1s to Mod 1 mk3 standard, as of 2023. They got the FN Mk3 furniture now.

Rangers also dedicate a lot of effort to door-kicking and other direct action ops, in close quarters like that the speed advantage of a red dot/eotech over an LPVO is definitely a factor.

@@robbell3217 exactly

There are plenty of dudes with magnified optics to handle distance and overwatch, while assaulters take down an objective. Ranger Regiment has been ahead of the power curve in this respect since the early 1990s.

Lol you can piggy back an RMR or T2 on a vortex Razor or any scope for that matter. So you don't necessarily have to just stick with a T2 on a unit mount for an EOTech on a riser.

is that really you?

I agree 💯

Because they are a bunch of infantry privates with shiny gear and no common sense.

@@user-wc8lu7qd2m But... but ... they have a cool patch.

​@@user-wc8lu7qd2m they are a sof unit

@@user-wc8lu7qd2m Still more useful than 99.9% of so-called “special” forces.

He will upload a Thai cooking video next.

no worries wall building video dropping next week

Patrons got it early

@@BattleOrder noice

@@BattleOrder Cool!

Leading the way

@@BattleOrder could you please do SEAL teams next

That would be fuckin sick

Less likely he was infantry then. Officers are typically issued sidearms as they are required to qualify with them. Again, infantry typically.

That is false

no one runs scars

@@tristan4115 my homie def does haha

Rangers are a sof unit under socom, marines are just regular infantry which specialies in amphibious insertion methods as regular infantry soldiers. So yeah a ranger is better than a regular marine

They’re absolutely terrible.

@@PaulScunnion207 whats so hated about them? weight? accuracy?

@@jon5255 On paper everything seems great. You can explain it’s features one at a time and it seems amazing. But collectively they add up to be an inaccurate mess.

Ironically Boston FD ended up adopting it on a large scale first. The FDNY didn't want to look like they where favoring the side ventures of a member.

they are in the armory but only new guys get them when there are no M4s available

That's a UTM bolt... Universal Training Munition (bolt) Used for force on force training.

A lot of organizational info on them can be hard to find, or be conflicting.

They could be a Captain or a Major

Except for the Vietnam era (when they weren’t really an infantry force per se) they were always basically a mix of infantry and special forces (light infantry structure/capabilities and special missions)

They’ve been special since Rogers’ Rangers.

Modern Rangers have been apart of SOCOM since the 70s.

TL has the garmin and atak so he would lead out

TLs always take lead

Lmao if you have ever shot both you would know that the 203 sucks

@@johnflank8135 I have though... and the M32... and the M240... plus the M4 and M27. Never fired a Carl G/AT4/M72/or Javelin, but got to hold them which was cool, would look through the CLU again tbh, or ride in the gun turret of a JLTV with a M41 Saber system (that I had no idea how to work lmao, but thankfully the sidemounted 240 was there.) Worst was carrying 8 60mm mortar in my main pack which was kinda heavy, in addition to the medbag that I had to carry. 3 years attached to a infantry battalion, but that isn't really a great view on my credibility, because everyone can have shitty opinions due to different experiences. The argument isn't that the 203 is better to shoot than the 320. The 320 is cool if all you want to do is shoot 40mm grenades, but if you want to shoot a rifle in addition to grenades, it makes sense to have it be ergonomical and easy to transition between. The 203 does that, the 320 does not.

@Insanegorey you speak of ergonomics, but having a 203 rifle mounted negatively affects handling the weapon. The whole allure of the 320 is that it can be used standalone. (Yes there are standalone chassis for the 203, they suck) I have not once in my 6 years in Regiment ever thought that the transition from Rifle to 320 was slow or that it could ever benefit from being faster. It's stupid to encumber a rifleman, making him less effective for no good reason. To say that there are no good holsters for the 320 is not accurate. I would rather have a holstered 320 over anything underslung on my rifle, and so would anybody who has ever been a grenadier. But hey, you have 3 years of what seems to be USMC experience, so you must be an SME on everything, right?

@@johnflank8135 I’m not a SME on everything, I’m just portraying what experience I had and how that feeds into what I believe. I was unimpressed with the retention systems we utilized, but it’s entirely possible that you had different equipment for retention. Most of the time the guys had a Velcro secured holster that was too tight and made transitions on the move difficult. Some guys would just buy braided bungee paracord and use that to retain it with a simple Velcro thigh strap that worked better, but that was NOT the normal at all. Even still, I disagree, based on what I saw and experienced. I do have another unrelated question, did RR have a good whole blood program when you were in? I’m very fascinated with the usage of the RMHB in its training of 68W’s and personally think that should be the gold standard across the service for corpsman/medics.

Extremely well trained "special forces" starts getting killed by shrapnels and medical condition, no food or water will crumble the moral , movie every 100m will seem like a mile.

Is just a cult, they wanna put themselves everywhere.

@@V34035 lol cope

@@scaucymancannotdiebaby7034 womp womp

@@V34035 womp womp what? 🤣🤣 Cry all you want, you wont change his PFP.

@@scaucymancannotdiebaby7034 I wasn't trying to.

Who asked?

Okay… I don’t think that was the point of this video

If you read the note at 6:52 you’d know why there is footage of Marines