Its not about that also, java has a big big community that can keep it alive for decades, these marketplace addons arent gonna last very long because they are limited, you must edit the main mc bedrock code to make Custom AI or you can make it with functions, but it is hard, so java wins no matter what.

Problem is if Microsol decides to yank the servers, not only will we have no skins and no authentication, but anyone who hasn't already downloaded the version of Minecraft they want to play will have to grab it from the High Seas.

​@@GSBarlev not sure about the other two issues, but people will definitely make custom skin servers. Just look at games like toontown online for example, communities will make things they love accessable again

I'd say if mojang got rid of java, some communities will make custom updates for it, and they would make it better than the mojang itself

​@@GSBarlev pirate java did solved all this long ago

A little bit Tiny Desk for me...

Yup so many better creators making free addons than the marketplace

hi

yeah

These are just the starter mods to set a starting point for other creators, these is not going to be the only mods (probably)

It was a map not a mod

I play both bedrock and java, one thing I will say is that java is the quality version, bedrock is the mass market cash grab version. So many of the minor things that you notice in java, that make the game feel better, so many of it's quirks, features, etc, are just missing in bedrock I don't know what it is exactly, but java is more fun for some reason. It could be that I have a different setup for my computer vs my PlayStation, or it could be that bedrock is too disconnected despite trying to be the same game. Maybe java reminds me of the old console editions I used to play before bedrock. I really don't know.

I once downloaded a furniture add-on and the stuff started walking away XD

@@jwalster9412 Bedrock is the GTA V for PS3, while Java has always been the GTAV for PS4 (because of higher processing power in general) but Java is not a good engine for how large minecraft is getting, or at the very least.. with how poorly they optimize their code.. then the large host of java related performance issues aside from code optimization

That's kinda funny actually

That protects us from shitty scam mods like you get on bedrock but it's a shame that legit mod creators can't get any compensation for their work

So your in favor of a marketplace on Java? because that is what it would come down to. Marketplace creators get ~60% cut, the other 40% to Mojang. Otherwise, creators can have their files behind a subscription to the creator, but in no means suggest that they're buying them through that process.

@@IIIllllIlllIIIIllllllIIIIII it is a very unpopular opinion for a marketplace on Java, everyone is fighting against it because they believe mods should be free. I like the access to free mods, but they've only ever been that way because it's infringement of the IP owner. I wish it would become a more popular opinion, because it also gives an avenue for mods being consistently updated as well.

@@outregis mods should always be free with an option to donate. Mod with money no one gonna use or buy, its unethical and just greedy.

are you this stupid mods should be free not paid mods

Agreed

Another thing is that I got scammed by a size changing mod because you have to be in 3rd person and it's not fun also all the good mods cost money

@@SeverenR-du9bl You can just download mods from websites for free just like you can in java. If you play on console though, then idk what you can do

Fun part is i can't even download free ones it's stuck on 0mb...

And the mods break completely after the next minecraft update because they don’t get updated.

Actually true, granted they very visibly see it this way but ta least they're not doing it to java (*yet*)

That's a view I never thought about. Nice!

who is gosh and why are we thanking them

That's quiet literally just mod page but supported by mojang, you can still download addons outside of markeplace for free just like mods in Java

Evil josh ​@@nonwibb

They don't need to turn into EA to be an evil corporation. They're already Microsoft.

mojang was never an evil corporation, its just that it was sold to microsoft like 5 years ago, and microsoft has slowly been corrupting mojang, pulling strings to make more profit...

​@@Forthakinemojang has control over the game. Bedrock is microsofts brainchild, Java feels different because jeb took over development when notch sold and he has a different view for the game. Thats literally it. Its just jeb for java

@@funky555 jeb is the sole reason the mc community isnt just 100% brainrotted ipad children.

​@@nixel1324 all Microsoft needs to do is abbreviate and they are evil.

Yes but the problem is you're essentially encouraging slavery and/or functional communism. Those creators get nothing back from those unless people support their Patreon (They've done studies to test that type of system on no matter what the context is, a money pot can never and will never work because people are just too selfish, and when they see that nobody else is supporting, they don't either), yet the masses demand more and more and are outraged when they don't get their way. When you're the most downloaded game in the entirety of human history, you're not going to make ANY money by catering to the people that already own the (on time purchase) game, and you'll eventually go out of business. This is why Mojang sold themselves to Microsoft. This is why Geometry Dash v2.2 took 8 years to come out. This is why Terraria ended yet failed twice to make a sequel game that the devs felt would satisfy the Terraria playerbase. This is why the garbage that is Call of Duty MW3 exists in the first place, to make something that requires continuous purchase rather than a 1 time thing, because less people will buy a new game then people that will spend money to get more of the game they already love. So many games, (not just mod creators), and even full studios completely go under because people demand so much that the effort required to keep the game afloat becomes more then the income made from it. No I am not supporting Mojang's decision to introduce Add-Ons, by the way. It's corrupt and greedy by all means, yet it wouldn't exist if people weren't willing to be a part of it. I'm explaining why creators are forced to flock to it despite its flaws anyways.

My biggest problem with bedrock cosmetics is that changing models (eg, fox ears) is limited to that marketplace portion. The mods/maps/texturepacks are more more complicated and much MUCH worse, as it will encourage spamming with content that does not have to be good, only popular at the moment, and people in the MC target age will pay for it. It's gonna be a matter of time before repeat of Faithful drama, with someone porting a mod to marketplace they had no rights to monetize. Honestly? As long as Java edition will still be available to download, it will only result in the ultimate version to port mods to, the way it happened with KSP for example. most of the advancement in modding was not because the game is advances, but because people put more time into it. Oh and don't listen to the other guy. While yes, making mods quickly becomes a second job, No modder I know mods for the money, but to make the game better. Hell, even having your mod closed source was frowned upon, and those few payed mods (before they were closed) were complete taboo.

the issue they don't understand is that 99%+ of people will not be staying for bedrock only, because Vintage Story already exists. If microsoft wants to learn how to have a viable business model in 2024, they should learn to make a product, instead of stealing from taxpayers.@@autistic_potato1037

I'm so tired of this perception that Java is somehow empirically more loved 🤣 The VAST majority are on Bedrock, and aren't as hyper concerned about it potentially being their main focus down the line (We're talking way down the line, because there really is no issue with having both at the moment. It just depends when Java Coding becomes to complex or the software kicks the bucket) but above all, you really think that if there was a push to only Bedrock, that there wouldn't be a massive community that rallies behind makin free Bedrock mods viable?

@@outregis people like Minecraft in general, and becasue MS is pushing bedrock version for both PC and consoles, it is understandable that there are more players there (tho it's not "vast majority"). This artificial seperation is arbitrary, as the whole point of java is that it can run on basically any device (with leading theory being that it was corporate decision from the start to seperate EULAs of those games). If Minecraft was the way Bedrock was from the start it would not retain my interest for this long. And yes, I do believe there would not be a push for bedrock mods even if MS decided to completely stop selling Java edition. My reasoning is two fold: 1) Bedrock modding is limited to datapack-like structure and API, which is fine for simpler blocks or entities, but falls short when you want to change more about your game. Hell even chairs showcased in video are actually entities not blocks, and apparently this is typical for those mods, and I would fear for the performance of a any type of factory build as entities. 2) Java will continue to exist as you can't kill it as a game that doesn't rely on central server to run. So all those modders that already put a lot of work into their mods will be unwilling to move to Bedrock even it it was technically possible. This is showcased by the fact how mods are really unwilling to change modloaders and some mods will just die on version change. You may argue that Bedrock would have only one modloader and better version compatibility but you won't get old java mods for bedrock AND EVEN if you don't care about old mods, the quality of modding will not come as easy. Java mods are so great now because people were constantly trying to out-do each other, where Bedrock modding is on the level from like 15 years ago, the beta days of MC.

There's a furniture mod on bedrock that has usable things that are also blocks and not entities

​@@sirmonkeyton2166name?

I remember playing a free map on bedrock a few years ago, it was an official free map by Minecraft, and the one thing I hated was that they added details like lamp post and signs to the map, but they were literally just frozen entities you couldn't kill unless you went into creative and killed them with /kill. Alot of the maps on bedrock do this and it's very crude. Also 90% of them you can break and go into creative just by setting the random tic speed to 0 and removing the command blocks under the map that set your game mod to adventure. I did this several times and found out that the free maps are usually thrown together messes with a lot of broken and unfinished bits. If that's the quality you get from the free maps you can't expect any better from paid ones.

I’ve always hated it, the way bedrock pretends to be open and better for creators but ends up being limited. Everything is just entities

There was a time when it was possible to modify the game thanks to the Blocklauncher

I firmly believe the Forge/Fabric APIs are infinitely better than anything that Mojang could officially release.

The Java what.

I mean at least we got something now 🤑

If we give Microsoft control of our mods things are gonna get bad

the modding api has been dead for at least 6 years man its time to let go

GTA lmao? You could download Car add ons and Gun add ons when there out bc worlds you pay for already do this, also wth you wanting GTA specifically on fucking Minecraft did gamestop tell you that you were to young to buy GTA V?

@@entertainmentgamer1992 Can't people just do what they want? Last time I remember there had The Walking Dead mods with guns and zombies, was I supposed to play COD Zombies?

@@captatech8081 cod zombies and walking dead arnt even the same man, did you forget Walking Dead has games to?

@@entertainmentgamer1992 Does that change the point? Was I supposed to play TWD games?

@@captatech8081 no but comparing COD Zombies to Walk Dead shows lack of intelligence, only similarities is Zombies and Guns

There is actually a "Another Furniture" mod by Starfish Studios for Java, and they confirm the bedrock version is theirs in the curseforge comments.

are you really going tinfoil hat on this? has there been anything actually deceptive, or are you just calling it that because you're on the bandwagon that instantly hates it?

Is this meant to be a conspiracy theory or something.

it's the same group pal

​@@marcopaulo_the issue is that their name is deceptively similar to 'crayfish', which is liable to make people mistake it for mrcrayfish's furniture mod

_oh but what of you could give us some more money??_

Then dont give them any, its not like they're forcing you at gun point to buy stuff from the marketplace.

​@@Pigness7 So we should just let it happen and not be allowed to express our disliking of this practice because, well they ain't forcing it in our faces are they? I guess we should also let activision make a dlc into a 70 dollar standalone barely content filled game because, well we don't have to buy it therefore it is okay for them to do that kind of practice.

​​​@@Pigness7Yeah, lets ignore the fact that Microsoft and Mojang are tricking clueless kids into wasting tons of their parents money on stuff from the Marketplace that most of the time are illegaly copied from popular mods or texturepacks on Java edition or content made from popular Minecraft youtubers without asking their permission like the Dream skin packs, which are very scammy. Brainless people like you are the reason why triple A games publishers and their products are greedy, scammy, souless, and bad.

@@jeremyhearne ok. I wish i had the power to end you. I do not. Oh well. Cya(nide)

Of course, it's only correct if they can take a cut of the revenue for themselves, which for a long time they couldn't do, only forbid anyone else from making any money directly through it. It's Really just a case of "If I can't make money from mods, then No-One can".

As much as I’d like to agree, it’s an EULA for a reason. End User being the key term; Microsoft/Mojang aren’t end user, so they’re allowed to do whatever they like

cope

Alas, that does not apply to Microsoft. Now buy the 37th unauthorized Dream Skin.

This is effectively Marketplace content, which functions very differently from mods

they did

nothing got done tho in the end

@@marcopaulo_ yes it did. physics mod pro had to become free because mojang doesnt want third parties to make money from the game without a cut of it, and obviously the creator didnt want to give the multi-billion dollar company more money so he made it free, and eventually TOS came out where it said "yeah nah no paid mods fuck you"

Mod authors just need to call them Add-ons now, then they can use the same ToS workaround to make money

that actually happen. At least twice. Once it was even with a mod that's author works in mojang currently (Aether). The other one was iwth faithfull resourcepack

This doesn't happen anymore (tho it has in the past) and Microsoft doesn't approve projects that do this now because they dont want to be seen as sanctioning theft

@@Adrian-ov6tr ether dimension is still on the marketplace (but is no longer called aether), but it seems that some of those stolen creations (like faithful) were actually removed.

What I'm about to say might be very weird. But... The main menu felt lonelier in the old Java days. It didn't feel like you were being bombarded with microtransactions. It never changed. It was familiar. Maybe that's it.

I still don't see bedrock as minecraft. Just a cheap nock-off cash grab.

​@@notknownlogic4161that's what I'm saying! I still can't take bedrock seriouslu

@@notknownlogic4161 it's innovative in some ways, but also just feels like a shell of Java. Really feels like you're just playing an approximation of actual minecraft in a way.

I'd like bedrock better, if they had taken creating a modding API seriously and stuck an LUA backend into it, or something. But no, they still want to use java mcpack tech/formats for some odd reason.

I dont see bedrock as minecraft, java is still the only version i respect.

​@@notknownlogic4161 bedrock sucks compared to java but its still MC

I mean Java seems more retro and bedrock seems much more refined, just look at the ui

I mean it's owned by Microsoft it's just good business

​@@SoggyChickenNuggets.Thats like the only thing bedrock has going for it, meanwhile with the amount of corruption problems, weird logic (redstone) and plain glitches makes it look like a beta version

Bro really said: Gun? sorry. Gun? sorry. Gun? sorry. Gun? sorry. Gun-

so we have tourettes@@neonotterpop2528

It always has been, they're getting desperate now, idiots!

I read this as soon at it happened

Im so mad that he didnt say what it accually was but that is typical of him for obvious stuff

Might have thought it was an UZI 😂

​@@chairocchiyeah I think so too is the only gun I can see in it

@@AnimeGamerCreater ya me too

Mojang and Microsoft makes this to milk parents wallets.

Console players are crying about this comment

There are ways to get free mods, skin packs, texture packs, and worlds even while on console with no other devices like a phone or computer. I've done it before, however I can't account for every individual console.

I use realm to transfer addons over to console btw just download the map

@@okOne_that’s not gonna end well is it..

Mojang has decided to go with the 90/10 split so yeah, there's that.

I knew that VRC will take some cut, but this is absurd. With every in game marketplace that appears I feel that stuff gets worse. Companies see that Roblox is a money press, and then try to catch a bit of that market. Also, beyond paypal fees Ko-fi is free if you don't have anything there beside one time donations, and then for subscriptions you can choose between 5% or 8$ a month flat.

I don't think this makes the point you thought it was going to make. Kinda irrelevant.

​@@xX_MC_OvU_PvP_YT_Xx my point is that it would be insane to pay that much to play RLcraft. I would love for you to explain your viewpoint.

@@glleesqwerty6402 you can still get mods for free on bedrock marketplace is just a way to support creators if they make content free you can still download and install it anyway.

@@xX_MC_OvU_PvP_YT_Xx The point is that it just that it's impossible to get a similar experience to java modding in bedrock without paying loads of money for it.

To be fair, you probably need the 377 pounds for a good PC setup to run RLcraft

This is why I advocate so hard for piracy. At least when I pirate something I've bought, it can't be taken from me due to being unsupported.

You can still play the game if you've bought it what are you on about

​@@frankmckenneth9254 Literally every company sees the entire world as the same as america and it's crazy They'd stare at a 3rd world country and say "they can definitely pay 1500 pesos for a single game that requires a subscription to play!" edit: to whoever just said "just don't buy games then".. I don't think you got the message of this comment 😅 I'm not complaining about the prices I'm complaining about how they're just allowing that to be so.

@@Zyrdrakyll Losing ur Microsoft account:

​@Zyrdrakyll they own the rights to s digital online download. They allow you to use it.

Where did you post the mods, I wanna play them.

​@DODOPLAYZ013 mcpedl probably

@@k90v85 yeah but name

How do you install them or get them to work with realms, I have been trying to work it out for weeks, my kid found a whole heap he wants but we can’t get them on the bedrock realm

@@Silath01 just download the mod, go to the mid file. If it is in zip, remove zip write ".Mcpack" Click on it and Minecraft will automatically open and important the mid. Then you can apply the mod in your world

No that's just wrong. On the surface I guess I can see the similarities but the BE modding API is so much more easier and quicker to use. I'm sorry but when you have to make animations using separate models for each frame or you cant add custom particles to the game or anything like that addons are better by a long shot. Don't get me wrong I love datapacks. There cool and fun and all but really hard to get into and actually make good stuff with especially considering that most datapacks that are high quality are pretty small content wise Addons Are Better.

@@CrazymodGD addons you mean Mods that we know and Love in Java right?

@@friendlyfire3412 This is probably going to start an argument but no im talking about addons for bedrock edition. Not the marketplace ones. The FREE and GOOD addons for bedrock edition.

@@CrazymodGDHe wasn't comparing the usability but the possibilities. Add-Ons have essentially only the same features as Datapacks because you can't add new or overwrite code. You can't even add real blocks or items, biomes, dimensions etc. It's not possible. Essentially the features of a datapack and the add-ons are the same even if the addons are quicker to setup and use.

@@umbreonben Yes you can add all of those things and they are not at all the same. First of all with data packs you cant make custom mobs. You have to tie a armor stand to a regular mob and do a wacky strange animation system of constantly making separate models for every frame. Second of all right click detection using data packs is INSANE levels of limited where you have to use a carrot on a stick instead of just making a weapon and adding right click detection to it. Third of all data packs and blocks are WAY more wacky and buggy than regular blocks as you have to use ITEM FRAMES so there will always be a problem with placing the block. They are nowhere near the same and the only thing datapacks have over addons is NBT which isnt needed at all on bedrock edition because of holiday creator features and dimensions which are still creatable with addons its just much harder. Come back to me when you guys have a real crafting system and a sensible animation system because you have clearly never looked at ANY actual addon.

I see this as an absolute win

ohgodno

Kids need to learn how babies are made 😊

Surely not, right? 👀

its for minecraft education edition

this is false. idk what addons you’re downloading but you can create your own blocks, as blocks and items as items

​@@sekretboiVery hard to do since Bedrock has poor modding support, people often take the easy route and make the blocks entity because of the entity interaction feature.

The aren't just gonna enable achievements on mods lol

Furniture addon did this but its not even dumb looking they have animations and all. Artic Snow Phoenix did not and when u hit the add on stuff they flashed red and made a dmg sound.

Java mods still have achievements because they're world specific

Pheonix just became Australian-American

Why do so many comments format their comments like this?

Or, alternatively not approving of add-ons that contain something they're planning to add later if it's too similar

Thankfully there is 3rd party loaders, but they are a pain to use

You wont *need* to encounter those issues though as its a mod system that doesn't work by modifying the games code. It uses an API mojang themselves keeps up-to-date. The assumption is that as long as they keep it up to date and functioning an older addon will still work. The biggest problem here is that we are not yet out of the era of the Addon API being drastically changed, not everything is figured out yet so this is probably going to lead to a wave of outdated addons very shortly.

Porting java mods to newer version when you are developer is just few clicks in mcreator. But on bedrock you don't need update to newer version.

@@villagecool6409 you don't need this. Just dowload addon and double click.

Bc console players cant use them and atleast these are safer for kids to use

@@entertainmentgamer1992 I’m a console user…I mod Minecraft everyday lol

Cause they’re young and weren’t around when addons were first released in 2016 and addons aren’t really talked about in the main bedrock community

@@skepabbas9400 tbh I only use the free addons

@@entertainmentgamer1992there is a way

Never has Mojang said it was impossible. It’s rather that they hated the easy access to the debug menu. As someone learning to game dev myself, I do understand, F3 can become a crutch and you often don’t want to give players crutches that change the experience the way F3 tends to. A debug menu is after all a developer tool. Java has it because it started out being developed with the community so players needed it to test for stuff. But that isn’t really the state of affairs today. It does suck that the developer version isn’t really accessible, though. Definitely blocks some ability to get started out, although I suppose that’s what sites like MCPEDL are for… Nah, who am i kidding, they’re just getting Java modders to join, it doesn’t really feel like they’re thinking hard about how to give new modders an in to start learning addon development.

​@@WhatIsMyPorpoiseNah, it's an excuse. They could easily implement the extra F3 info as part of "allow cheats", so it would be a tool instead of a crutch, and many other ways, but Mojang is at a state where they do the bare minimum for free just to shovel all their paid content

you are all mistaken, mojang doesn't want to give f3 to bedrock players because babies don't understand it, remember mojang officially said that minecraft is a kids exclusive game that is also why they had beef with modders after Microsoft took over, Microsoft hates when people use their products in a way they are not suppose to and they slowly take away your ability to do anything on their systems

I'm wondering what the split between what mojang gets and what the mod devs get

People are not allowed to share nda content because it would cause damages to Mojang and marketplace. Think about it. If mojang told us things ahead of time, let's say a year or two, everyone would be complaining that its taking so long to come out.

you can actually just load cc content like a normal mod if you "acquire it" via some means since that's all it is

i thought valve greenlight was to fund mods enough to make them full games, at least until hdtf ruined everything.

People didn't like that Valve allowed mods on steam?

@@brayonyx14 Hes not talking about green light. for a moment around like 2014 you could buy mod on the steam workshop for skyrim (It actually worked a lot more like a donation system if I recall but people didn't really pay attention. they just heard "payed mods")

@@ashnambers tbh, given bethesdas obsession with making money it seems like that idea wouldve come fro them and not valve, though i understand the backlash

>- Mods are more curated They arent, have you seen the officially curated Minecraft Marketplace? It's packed full of stuff that i'd bet you is 100% illegal, or at best legally dubious, like using a person's likeness without their permission, pretty much entirely lifting someone else's mod and making money off it, etc You also forgot to add: They're now a monetary reason to make mods, which means many are going to be less "because i want this"/passion projects, and more "how little can i get away with to wring $5 out of you?", a bit like the Skyrim Creation Club "Mods". Like, say, the "guns" in CC which are actually just straight up Dawnguard Crossbows with a skin, with effectively nothing that makes them unique otherwise, compared to similar mods that do far more, or ones that arent limited to vanilla and do a total addition.

Minecraft since its inception was a purely educational tool. Java, Voxels, Redstone switches, blueprints of circuit diagrams and flat earth jokes revealing Top Secret Science. When it ran counter to State backed Education that is when Microsoft with its many military grants bought out Minecraft just to inflict its own indoctrination on any youth therein with a campaign of banwaves and censorship. Epstein did not kill himself. Learn2Code.

@@higueraft571 Curated just means that a third party gets to decide what is and isn't there, not that said third party actually makes good decisions.

Modders can still put their mods up for free if they want to (even in the marketplace, some stuff is free). The marketplace is literally just an option they have if they want to make money, and it's not like there aren't other ways to install addons. If they start shutting off non-marketplace mods, then that would be terrible, but it would also be a PR suicide, so I don't think they'd do that.

@@Cube-xm6vtDevil's advocate, but the easier you make it to charge people, the more likely people will charge. Not saying that they don't deserve recompense, but paying for something usually indicates a level of quality. (you'd hope) and from what I hear, the marketplace is not very high quality. Shockwaves effect if they choose to go back on the statement that modders may not charge for their mods on Java, with the added caveat they get a cut. Then we have it spreading even farther, and it will probably VERY quickly go to other games. How long til Steam workshop becomes a marketplace? This is setting a precedent that in the end is focused on making it easier to be a mod developer in some ways (but not really that much) which harms players and benefits the corporation. The fact that it helps modders is entirely sidelined. How much farther does it push til the marketplace becomes the only distributor of content like this? Maybe minecraft won't have that happen, with how frankly massive its community is and how bad that would appear, but that doesn't stop other games from doing it. This is what we can consider a erosion of the player=modder community that will probably ripple across every videogame, and only because it skips out that simple step to start a patreon. And again, I do get it, not every modder can be supported by patreon, or whatever else, but presumably many people already well understood that their modding hobby was not going to pull in a living, and the fact that they might get some money by selling on the marketplace isn't likely to really change that either.

Not to mention any gun mods being kicked off the store for not being "kid friendly." At the same time there are swords and bows in Minecraft, which realistically are far more gruesome that guns.

theres a seperate third party place where you can get addons made by the community for free :/ and alot of them are super high quality, even better than java mods at times

Not to mention, a bunch of stuff really cant *modify* the game itself, only add onto it. So stuff like Create is utterly impossible, you can never add Stress Units or RF or FE.

Meanwhile Advertizers are going to skirt all the rules, just all of them. Want drugs, guns, and sweet sweet sneaker deals sold by "insert pop star popular with the teen demographic now" in conjuction with adias or nike, then thats just fine for a game that is supposed to be kid friendly! They paid to be there after all! Who cares if it gives little timmy an unhealthy obsession with snorting his pixie sticks. They paid!

You do realize that you can download all of those on bedrock too? Maybe not exactly them but i only play on bedrock and i had a gun mod. Also what's unmarketable or unsafe about mo creatures and computercraft?

We need to normalize donating to mod authors

@@_BangDroid_ modding exist for over 20 years, and donating never worked very well, this will never happen sorry.

Java modders still do.

@@cola98765 java still do which is a good thing.

Ngl I think it kinda looks like a paint brush

It is a hammer

​@@Creeperstormer Yeah

Its a hair dryer

It's a door

that's because right now trying to create GUI is a headache on bedrock, they are constantly changing the code for it every hotfix for the new UI. You can definitely make chairs actually blocks though, i'm guessing it's only an entity so you can sit on it. You can also make basic world generation

yes I know that made me so annoyed when I was testing out some add ons, like why does it have to be an entity? Do you really need the little quirky animation?

soo bedrock modding never changed since 2016? Like, I remember as a kid I played a lot of MCPE (seven seas edition) and all mods retextured blocks or made entities, because they're probably easier to code in I think?

@@Gustoberg it changed a lot

I KNOW OK!

If you're on a PC or on mobile

​@@giratina6665También se puede en consola,solo que es más complicado,pero no imposible

No one forcing you

Addons are free to download on bedrock.

@@emilydavidson8844 So we should just accept shady practices?

​@@riztiz yeah, mcpedl. I don't know why but they just ignore it.

Microsoft isn't forcing anyone to charge or pay for add-ons you know

Yes! The physics are so weird in bedrock edition IMO and I don't understand why

Carm

Respectfully, as a Bedrock main who also plays Java (less frequently), I don't understand your perspective.

Unfortunately it feels more like a rip off of Java when it should be equal in quality

The friction is different? Huh? What are you java users complaint about this time?

yes

a very off-centre hammer

A HAMMER GUN!!!

thats the plan i guess, they force mod creators to sign up to bedrock's marketplace if they want to profit off their mods so that microsoft always gets a 30% cut of the revenue.

mojang doesnt do that, microsoft does.

Yea, whats your point? That mojang has the exclusive rights to monetise derivative works and you don't? This isnt a gotcha

@@reecesx the point is microtransactions are bad

Yeah cause selling other people's stuff is illegal. Glad we can clear this up.

Facts bro

there are addons not mods, and it was a community idea

Well the mods arent that bad If your a java player youre gonna obviously find something to rant about The bedrock mutants mod is way more lively but less iconic

​@@fldom4610semantics

even then for fortnite its just cosmetics and are completely optional (but they do exploit your fomo a lot though) but for this, these mods actually have a purpose and are free on java. and a lot of these mods could either be plagiarized or be extremely low quality and are selling them for stupid high prices, some are like 6 BUCKS

The huge potential? Yeah, that potential was already explored in curseforge and modrinth. That potential is filled by Java. Only someone who doesn’t use Java would have anything nice to say about this.

@@brendan5260 Bedrock and Java are distinct, if one has a need met, mods, it doesn't mean the other one also has that need met

​@@HydraKittten That doesn't even make sense, both are the exact same game, the only difference is that one version is basically "free for use" and the other has no interaction from the community, this "add-on" feature is just a cash grab, if they really wanted to help monetize modder they would have done that way before, curseforge exists as a hub for modding, why microsoft didn't help it to monetize the mods?

​@@PlayerUzUnot a priority. And I have a feeling people would not like MS touching and influencing such a big Java mod hub. even it it did bring about good things, people will always be paranoid of MS purposefully doing something bad to it. I understand why the bedrock marketplace exists, and I'm pretty neutral about it. It has its place, you don't have to like it.

@@JDReC100 I don't care about marketplace cause i don't play bedrock, i fear for MC future since it's possible it can be only option later. And imagine, every good mod you want being paid, not only that, no quality control. It's just not a good way to monetize mods.

bedrock mods suck anyways bedrock is not that much for modding.

@@fldom4610 there used to be bedrock mods but they are kinda trash and outdated (maybe not the chinese mods)

add-ons already existed since years ago, and there was in-game behavior and resource packs support for off-marketplace mods.

no they are good now lol @@fldom4610

Okay, so you don’t know this but marketplace developers have access to a developer version of Minecraft that allows them to mod and create freely. (which is unfair for normal independent modders) it’s clear they don’t have limitations if you’ve seen the stuff they made

Only 30 USD, but microtransactions still don't belong in a game you pay for.

This isn't lootboxes lmao. The marketplace is a platform for creators to host their work and earn revenue from it.

@@riztiz despite the fact phoenix said he makes content on there and doesn't get paid for it

@@riztiz also despite the fact mod developers have been doing amazing work for free for years

cough cough... call of duty... cough cough

welp thats minecraft bedrock to ya

You can blink, and Bedrock has animations in emotes that you can buy too, like waving

​@@malvadochefeme in the year 2040 having to pay to walk

@@malvadochefewaving is free, breakdancing will be like 10$💀

ha ametshers

Mods should not be monetized buts it ok to ask for donations of possible. That way they can get full price

Microsoft* pulling a *Microsoft

@@SpunkMayoBethesda added their paid mods long before they were bought by microsoft.

@@AutTheWizard which makes me wonder if it's not Bethesda people that suggested this idea for MC.

REALLY? thats insane bro i love pams to just building a house and cooking for days but they made it cost 31£? thats insane pams has like 5 mods 31 for 3 mods in just crazy

Pam's Harvestcraft only costs €4. You don't need to buy the two old versions, which are very different from the Java version, they're just still available for anyone who wants them.

@@tainttracker7556If that's the case then I'd look pretty silly. But I remember it differently, if it's cheaper then good. I vaguely remember the seasons mod and the temperature mod, which on Java are all on Pam's website and are meant to be used together, were separate mods with their own price tags.

aint no way anyone gonna caught me lacking buying a $31 addon. and btw its not mods its addons there no such thing as mods on bedrock.

It allows modders to make money from it. As far as I can tell modders can still put stuff up for free if they want, they just also have the option to monetize it.

@@Cube-xm6vt Fair enough, but you could also just pay them for the mods you curate. Or if one is insistent on charging for them, working on a consistent pack for sale as DLC with Modders. Bethesda hasn't added official support for Terry Wads as free DLC to my knowledge.

Addons are free on websites and mojang devs support it

It’s microsoft who is the problem

you always had to pay

​@@GenmDev-yb2mxye they just want to milk parents wallets.

I agree with you on this. It's nothing to get overly mad about. Yes, micro transactions are bad, but it's only really a problem as soon as people start abusing this part of the marketplace too. Once that happens, it's a much bigger issue, but I don't think we should just jump the gun and assume the worst.

Yes .

I like the idea that several of these first wave add-ons are either directly free or have a free lite version to play around with. If that is how they are going to handle things, I'd be much less opposed to the idea of paid mods for anyone who doesn't have a PC. However, I don't know if these freebies are actually a decision by the marketplace creators themselves or if Mojang is just using it for this first wave only as a marketing strategy.

Well obviously but ur talking about 3rd party addons from a cheap website that starts with a m and ends with an l I’m sorry but I’ll stick with better quality addons from the market place

​@@hehasnolips1371no, he literally says in the video it's been around since 2017

Yeah, we straight up have 3 separate definitions for add-ons in the Minecraft space now and 2 of them are official. 1) An add-on is a mod that specifically builds on top of an already existing mod. 2) An add-on is a datapack style addition you add while setting up a new Bedrock Edition world. 3) An add-on is meant to be the Bedrock Edition equivalent of a Java mod, capable of being added to already existing worlds. What's even better is that there is no add-on tab in the world creation menu, you are apparently meant to toss that stuff into "behavior packs" (correct me if I'm wrong) and Mojang failed to accompany the addition of the add-on category in the marketplace with the ability to filter for add-ons as a content pack type.